OH BOY ANOTHER REMAKE
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
OH BOY ANOTHER REMAKE
OH BOY ANOTHER REMAKE
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Why would that need a remake wtf?
So they can get as much money as they can while putting in as little effort as possible, duh.
Likely because they're riding the shanty tiktok fad, it was the last good Ass Creed game for many, and they likely want to pull the plug on the original's servers (it's literally next in line, Ass Creed 3's servers already got pulled and all we're left with is the inferior "remaster").
>assassins creed servers
Servers for what? Aren’t these all single player games?
You're exactly right, but they still have servers. Black Flag used the servers for various special events, such as a Moby Dick style whale hunt. It was nothing other than Ubisoft's attempt to "fight piracy" by punishing paying customers who had spotty internet connection. It is a practice they continue to this day, despite the fact their "online enhanced" singleplayer can be easily gotten around.
tl;dr The French are wine sodden morons.
the french are also big on unions and rights and such, so even the janitors at ubishit are paid a frickton. which helps to explain why they crank out shitty sequels again and again like there is no tomorrow. they literally can't afford to chill for a while and come up with a cool game idea,
they have multiplayer modes you absolute twat.
And they were quite fun in truth.
Brotherhood to BF all had multiplayer servers for the multiplayer mode, and then for the singleplayer of BF you had White Whale spawning events that randomly happened while online and only online where you hunted a White Whale and by killing three you got a unique outfit. It's the only way to get it as well without cheating it in.
There were also the social chests, which gave a bit of money and would unlock an outfit and weapons, and the royal convoys, which gave 10k if you sunk them (and could be captured for a max-stat frigate). There were also some community challenges once upon a time, but those didn't stick around (and they never bothered to make their items obtainable).
>the shanty tiktok fad
the hwat
How do you even know what that is?
>the shanty tiktok fad
That one was already over when they added the shanty easter egg to Dead Space 2023
Because it had black slave dlc
So basically they're just going to remake a modern game that doesn't need one and censor or remove all of the "potentially offensive" parts from it. Just great.
Because Black Flag is the last game they didn’t completely shit the bed on.
But they did. The Abstergo sections ruined the game completely. It was literally unplayable garbage with the constant shitty cutscenes interrupting gameplay. There was no excuse for inserting a forced walking sim when Asscreed gameplay is such boring/no skill trash already.
AC1 would be a better choice.
They’d have to put more work in for ac1. You know we can’t have that in the remake era.
seamless travel between locations, and all islands fully explorable like in Odyssey
the cities will probably be much larger too, since they were pretty barebones in IV
The gaming industry is creatively bankrupt but that won't stop from the average gamer buying the product because if you look into the comments of that tweet you'd see people cheer on of it getting a remake.
they're just not capable of making a new game
remakes are already made for you so you just have to copy them
diversity hires and foreign slave labor are almost capable of remakes and you can just throw a ton of clutter around and enable ray tracing to make some bullshots to justify their existence even when the original game is still very modern.
in this case it's extra blatant because they've got Skull and Bones delayed 7 times or something and still have nothing promising to show, they've clearly giving up and trying desperately to catch the last embers of the pirate fad before it fades completely.
This is the real reason.
The problem is they won't be able to do a 1-to-1 remake with improved assets. They will frick it up with gender-neutral pronouns and a troony pirate. They can't help themselves.
The ship minigame that gained you currency in game was too good to not go back and add micro transactions to
because every game will get REMADE and YOU WILL BUY IT
I'm fine with remasters where it's just a port with the graphics slightly improved. Not as good as backwards compatability but take what we can get I guess.
>diablo 2
is it worth it? i know they fricked up warcraft
To be fair, Rome Total War did need a remaster.
Honestly, I would not mind remastered fighting games with updated netcode, but it would mean splitting the community of the "current thing", so we wont see anything like that from big publishers
Their current plan is to remake every title and at least tripple the Black person count, pressured by investors.
you can say that about every remake
I assume they're not gonna want to waste Skull and Bones' assets so they think they are clever when they reuse them for the remake.
Won't believe it 'til I see it. They haven't even fricking released Skull % Bones yet
The same reason Dead Space or The Last of Us needed one
So they get more money from nostalgiabait for zoomers, they already are nostalgic for overwatch 1 no i'm not kidding. Zoomers should be banned from touching video games, they have never experienced something that could be called a good game they only experienced a dying medium full of mediocre products and now we have nothing but sequels and remakes, nothing new or original you can find with AAA studios.
That game is a decade old and was the AC I played. I hate how it took away killing npcs.
because it is a 10 year old game?
Game technology hasn't advanced far enough in the past 10 years to make a tangible difference.
you're an absolute moron.
>it should get a remake because its ten years ago, nevermind the fact ghrapics are practically still the same
I fricking loathe you zoomers so damn much.
It was the pirate game that everyone wanted Skull and Bones to be. Since its just a rejigging they aren't going to cut all those tailing missions either.
It has some of the worst combat in the game and the underwater exploration is dated. That's all I can think of though. AC2 deserves a remake far more.
*in the series
AC2 is still damn fun to play, a visual update would be nice though.
they should remaster the AC's that have unskippable cutscenes.
I'm not really enthusiastic about remakes, but if you replayed AC4 you'll see that the game REALLY needed a couple more patches, specifically the parkour is fricking horrible in that game, constantly bumping into invisible stuff, constantly getting stuck, and getting shanties can be a pain because of this.
Most people only remember the good parts, but I've replayed it a couple of months ago and the foot sections are terrible.
And on top of that there's the fact that it has the most braindead iteration of combat in the entire franchise.
This is one of the few games that could benefit from a remake, but then again it's Ubisoft so they might make it even worse.
AC2 is perfect as is, it doesn't need any remakes.
to make money
this is why any remake exist
games that actually "should" be remade are complete shit ones that were not successful in the first place, because there is room to improve and make something goos
because they'll half ass it and enough people will buy it.
Less peoppe to hire.
More guaranteed money cause it worked at one point or nostalgia
Rewrite history and remove problematic shit
None of these games need a remake. None! Prove me wrong.
To be fair Black Flag was downgraded heavily to be able to run on WiiU.
It could actually use a remake with better shaders and better AI, but we all know ubishit is so incompetent the remake will actually look worse
It doesn’t fricking matter
How many times does it need to be stated no matter what you believe about remakes or how you justify them
The industry sees it sells so they will endlessly churn out this fricking garbage and I fully expect to see “it’s time to remake a game from just five years ago” at some point.
I just replayed black flag and it aged really well, obvious cash grab trying to get us moronic people to buy the game again.
There's always room for improvement.
>improvement
Black flag is better then the last few games they have released, I doubt they are going to improve it.
I've played some great remakes of classic games recently that improved upon what seemed perfect. Most developers are remaking their best games with great flair.
My worst fear is it being a glorified port because unimaginative people are like, "you can't improve it." Utterly pointless release if so.
>My worst fear is it being a glorified port because unimaginative people are like, "you can't improve it." Utterly pointless release if so.
That’s a double edge sword though, remaking a game is fine but changing a beloved game rustles feathers. I can’t think of any remakes that have been an improvement. They tried to improve ff7 but the remake was easily much more boring than the original.
FF7R, Dead Space Remake, RE4 remake.
To hype up Skull & Bones, obviously
Serious question.
Who the frick buys Ubisoft games? As soon as you see that logo, even as a publisher you know you're in for a really bad time.
They couldn't even do a SCOTT PILGRIM DEFINITIVE EDITION correctly because you have to sign up for UPlay to unlock Knives even on consoles.
Open world map-clearing games tickle my autism.
You are scum.
So what's the fricking point of a remake then?
they don't tickle your "autism", they tickle your dopamine receptors because you need games to "reward" you to feel any enjoyment.
> I play games that are unrewarding
wat
Soul. Compare this with Far Cry 6's map and the difference is night and day
I bought Far Cry, Assassin's Creed II and Far Cry 3
but rayman origins and legends tho
Far cry games are ubislop-kino, For honor is great, and the division games have dark zone which is surprisingly fun as frick. Ubisoft are capable of making competent games
>Who the frick buys Ubisoft games?
Goys who like slop. Simple as is. Ubisoft perfected the formula of mediocrity, a timekiller for normies.
Ok but oddyssey was really good
lmao
> I only play Bioware games! I like the extra gay penis mods. They really make my butthole red.
>Who the frick buys Ubisoft games?
I'm glad you asked this cause there was this black nerd in my high school who was a Clarence Thomas type conservative who would always say that Hitler made some salient points and I remember he'd get really mad if you shit talk these games
So did he completely miss the message of the early games or did he want to join the Templars
The Ubisoft game I own is No More Heroes 2 on Wii. I am free from the logo otherwise. I've been told the PS2 Prince of Persia games are good but who wants to play sandBlack person shit lol.
You're moronic. Prince of Persia was made in pre 2010. It's as white washed as it gets. I always thought the prince was white.
there are some pathetic specimens on this site who can't let go of 7th gen and still buy yearly Ubisoft and Activision installments
a d they feel ashamed of it, they're the ones spamming goyslop at anything but their AAA slop
zoomers.
Reminder: you are not the target audience anymore.
>Who the frick buys Ubisoft games?
Me I buy them.
>more time in New Dawn than Far Cry 5
>Far Cry 3 untouched
This is peak moron shit
New dawn looked nice.
Far Cry 5 looks the same everywhere. All forest. It became boring.
>Far Cry 3 untouched
Was gonna play it after Far cry 1 but 1 is outdated AF. I can't enjoy it as I was a kid. So I forgot about playing 3.
You're missing 7 AC games.
>300 hours in Valhalla
Explain.
He must have bought every DLC and collected every collectible on the maps. He also probably suffers from ADD.
How. I've cleared the maps and only have a few last missions to do and I'm just short of 73 hours. Does the DLC add that much content or do you guys just play slow as shit?
You've clearly not done everything in every single map outside of the story if you're only at that much time spent. You also have to
>Clear every single map and every single location in those maps.
>Get every single item from every single store since multiple stores now have unique armor and weapons in them due to the newest patch.
>Get all the equipment from the River Raids (Which alone takes about 60 hours bare minimum).
>Complete the Ireland DLC which includes maxing out the buildings and obviously clearing the map.
>Complete the France DLC which includes hours of farming missions with the rebels to buy all the items and upgrades in their store.
>Complete the roguelike mode, upgrade every single body type, upgrade all the skills, and buy out its entire store.
>Complete the mastery missions which mean getting gold on everything and then clearing the final area of it.
>Complete the crossover island which is at least 5-8 hours.
>Complete the epilogue which is like two hours.
At least 100 hours were also from logging in every week or two and doing challenges for exclusive items like the Adrestia and Jackdaw ship pieces, like eight different weapons, the AC logo tattoos, etc. They've patched those in now so you can just buy them at random shops. At least 2 hours were also because of the seasonal events which you can't do anymore.
>Rogue is the best one in the series dude.
It's bad, stop lying to the man. Every single character is garbage, Haytham isn't even remotely like he was in 3 despite the story taking place during 3, Shay is easily one of the worst written MCs outside of Eivor, The Eagle Bearer, Jacob, and Arno, the story can't even justify Shay turning in any way that makes sense and gives no reason why he should still be a Templar after 3's events, the Morrigan is weak compared to the Jackdaw despite the legendary ship battles being amazing, the Assassins hunting you is incredibly irritating, the Wanted revamp is awful, etc.
20 hours, not 2, sorry. Seasonal events took a decent amount of time grinding the archery game, the wave battle, or hours of consecutive battles in the arena on the lowest difficulty.
That sounds absolutely horrible and not worth doing at all.
That's the 100% requirements. I don't even know what Ragnarok entails but I know the new Divine and whatever upgrades are annoying if you want a full armor and weapon set of the stuff.
Was it worth it?
Outside of River Raids and the main story I'd say it was okay. The DLC and post-patch content was the best part of the game outside of the seasonal stuff. It's definitely not a great game but I enjoyed it more than Odyssey.
Hey, I have standards.
>Hey, I have standards.
>Says Valhalla is better than Odyssey
>Says Rogue is bad
You clearly don't have standards, dude. Do you have autism? Serious question.
Odyssey had a terrible story, terrible characters, pretended characters mattered when they appeared a whole one time, did an extremely piss poor job of Modern Day, completely ruined what AC is supposed to be which is a jack-of-all-trades game to focus on garbage builds, had absurd amounts of padding that even Valhalla only reaches with River Raids, and had so many areas that looked borderline identical it felt like you were going mental from the repetition.
Rogue I've already given you a plethora of issues. Why do you even think Rogue is a good game? Because they improved the islands compared to BF, the fantastic Legendary Ship battles, and Shay has a cool outfit? Great, that doesn't excuse virtually everything else being terrible. They didn't even attempt to make you like the Templars, they just turned them into Assassins with a very minor hint of them being bad via Haytham's bloodthirst and Gist saying he'd kill Shay, that's it. Monroe is basically a saint just to get you to try to like them. Shay can't even justify anything he does and the betrayal is the most hamfisted garbage possible that requires everyone at all times to be mentally deficient to have it happen.
>Rogue is bad
>I have standards
Well I guess standards are subjective.
It's not that hard if you're a 100%er. I don't even have the Ragnarok DLC yet nor have I gone to every general store to buy the stuff they added to them in the last patch.
You need to find yourself a girl mate.
>dude, have sex, just have sex, bro, just...because its totally related
lel, go back to your reddit blog
I was just making a joke... I'm sorry.
>Literally on a Gankerirgin board
Why would I waste my money and time on that? I can easily pay women for sex and don't have to deal with the relationship bullshit. It's a time/money saver.
You better post a review of Mirage when it comes out.
Need to know how much horse shit they actually put in it.
I don't buy these games until they're $20 and only buy the DLC when it's on heavy discount. What kind of crazy person buys Ubisoft games at full price?
You'll play hundreds of hours of pure slop but paying full price is where you draw the line? kek
Fun. Also 70 hours is probably a friend playing it.
I've played them all on consoles. Only thing I haven't played are the worst ones, Liberation, Rogue, Unity and Syndicate. Rest I have.
>Only thing I haven't played are the worst ones
>Rogue
Rogue is the best one in the series dude. It's Black Flag but better and without the tailing missions.
What the shit? AC4 isn't even 10 years old yet. This isn't like Persona 3 where the game in question aged poorly compared to its sequels and was in dire need of a remake to bring it up to the latest game's standards.
My thoughts exactly.
>This isn't like Persona 3 where the game in question aged poorly compared to its sequels and was in dire need of a remake to bring it up to the latest game's standards.
Except Persona 3 is perfectly playable and fun as it is. There are so many other SMT games that should be remade because they are either mechanically broken or just shit. Hell, the only way to play some of these games are with janky translations like SMT2 on SFC
Dumbass remakes are only made to replace the original in the cultural memory, not for any artistic or technical reason.
>9 years isn't a long-ass time
>3-4 years till release
wow, thanks for the heads up
It was the last good game they made, I don't see a reason not to remake it.
Is it an actual remake or will it be a remaster like Ezio Collection/3 remastered?
That can't be real, unless image is switched?
It's real. In order to make a good remaster you have to do things like changing lightning directions in order to adjust this sort of shadow problem, but remaking whole cutscenes is expensive so they just swapped textures and lightening engines and called it a day.
It's real, the remaster of 3 is an outright downgrade in almost every way compared to the original. It only has a few quality of life improvements but adds more bugs, destroys the visuals, and ruins how everything looks on the characters.
did they really also changed the dialogues?
Nah, for some reason the remaster's subtitles have a bigger font so instead of giving you the full phrase it shows a few words at a time
No, in the remaster they made the subtitles twice as big and on top of that they're mistimed so you'll have lines that don't even have subtitles because it can't catch up at all.
this picture also highlights a really stupid issue which is how they changed the subtitles for no reason, remaster has the character names (probably because "think of the deaferinos") which already eats up an entire line and then the text is frickhuge which means they can't even fit more than 8 words on screen at all times
it gets even stupider when someone in the game speaks a foreign language, which also has its subtitles in BOTH languages so it'll look something like
>FRICKFACE MCGEE
>Honhon sacrebleu l'omelette du fromage! (Fricking english c**t have a nice day!)
which doesn't look bad right now but that shit won't even fit on screen all at once in the remaster
obviously i don't really need subtitles to understand what's happening in the game but when they frick up something this simple you know you're in for a "quality" remaster
>left doesnt look at the pesons he aims at
Right is better. Case dismissed.
Wrong. This is from my own playthrough a weeks ago.
Stacy Wasian vs Femcel Asian
Why does the 'remaster' look like absolute shit compared to the original? What was even the point?
because that's how remasters are done. they just frick up the lighting and re-model the faces a tiny little bit, maybe, but that's it. complete remakes are where it's really at.
>Ganker is once again bewildered at the sight of actual lighting and shadows in a game
I bet you are one of those posting "Raytracing is go-" threads
Smart move
It wasn't even a good pirate game. Crew was a lifebar.
Has there EVER been a good pirate game? Besides maybe Money Island if you count the first 2 of those.
Sid Meyer's Pirates is great for what it is
I'm probably in the minority, but I liked Sly 3's pirate section.
yeah, it was very realistic, actually.
Ubisoft had probably the most fun, accessible and engaging ship combat up until now, and did nothing good with it. They are braindead.
I was imagining something like star citizen on the seas, and we were nearly given skull n bones. I WONT BUY A LOW EFFORT REMAKE
Why the hell wouldn't they remake 1? It's gameplay is the one in most need of a overhaul with all 9 targets having the exact same set up missions
Yeah I was thinking the same. I’m planning on replaying all these games soon(I actually stopped right before Black Flag originally) and the first one is the only one I remember being kinda shitty
It's a shame because 1s story and the clash between thr enlightned but cynical Templars against Altairs well meaning but blind fanaticism coupled with the atmosphere of the setting is some of the best in the series.
Because you only remake good games.
1-3 were the only good AC games. Black Flag was a fluke.
1 was a bad game.
shit taste
>OH BOY ANOTHER REMAKE
Remakes are preferable if they don't change anything. New games are mostly gay.
How long till we get the first 8th gen remake? We have clearly run out of any notable classic left to resell.
Horizon 1 is getting a remake.
>sony is still trying to make horizon a thing
>220 million dev budget
Don't forget the TV series
>it’s only updated graphics just to nicadofy her like they did in the sequel
What is there to remake? Making more npcs black? fricking insane
I AM-
I AM GONNA-
I AM GONNA RECOOOOOOM
AC4 would need a frick ton more sea content to even make a remake worthwhile. If they want easy money they should buy/licence sid meters pirates! IP and just remaster AC4 assets for it.
I'm so sick of remakes. I hate the modern gaming audience.
The series deserves a third piracy-era sailing entry.
AC4 was one of the best looking 7th gen video games, why the frick would it need a remake?
Betting on stuff that sold well in the past is better than doing something new and risking a failure I guess
>7th gen
ok boomer
Hea not wrong, it was cross gen
No joke I play this shit on the Xbox 360 and it was one of the better games I'd tried despite how demanding it was. And I even played it on an original 2005 Xbox 360.
Amazed why it'd need a remake. Pretty sure it's just Ubisoft french tactics.
Good, it's time to buy it again and create a counter culture movement around it
Isn't this a new game??
this is what i was thinking. what happened to the new pirate game they were making based off AC4 popularity?
Skull and Bones got delayed like five times and everyone that played it says it's boring as shit
literally how could they frick that up if they already had a good foundation for a pirate game in AC4, all they had to do was take away all the dumb assassin shit and thats 3 quarters of a good game right there. what exactly did those who played say?
Starting to think these companies just don't have the money to make anything new.
Dead Space showed them you can see success with a remake of a perfectly playable game.
If they record another shanty/seafaring folk music album and release it separately, it will have been worth it.
I don't care, a remake of this would be great if they went with the RPG stuff from the later games.
We STILL don't have a good open world pirate RPG.
INB4
>Ubishit
>Good
At this point I'll take what I can get.
>putting in the shit that made AssCreed worse
>a remake of this would be great if they went with the RPG stuff from the later games
Ah, yes. I love being unable to kill someone because I didn't previously grind my sword to Legendary Davy Jones' cursed skullcrusher +420
Super engaging gameplay
I hate you.
>Wanting the very shit that ruined nu AC
I'll kill you homosexual.
>Wanting the shit mechanics and gameplay formfrom NuAC
(You) are not an Assassin's Creed fan.
>don't care, a remake of this would be great if they ruined
kys zoomer
>he wants MORE of the generic RPG lite Open World bullshit that has not only been plaguing this series but the entire industry for years now
fricking have a nice day
odyssey almost captured a bit of the 4 magic, but it only had 3 or 4 shanties that got so repetitive you just had barnabus tell the crew to shut up every time you got on your ship.
>Makes the one female pirate acting as a man a troon
Hell no.
It's just going to be like the 3 remake/remaster, frick all will be changed besides a few shaders / textures that will somehow look worse, throw in some extra pre-order / dlc shit, nothing of consequence will be added.
Just a reminder they have 21000 employees and a net worth of $3.55 billion
>Want to get into the remake grift
>Immediately decide to remake the FOURTH entry that's not even a bad game
They're desperate as frick kek
>FOURTH entry
sixth* seventh if counting Liberation eight if counting Bloodlines
>Ubisoft thinks they're one of the cool kids who get to remake their games
Didn't they already remake it once?
I DREAMED A DREAAAAAAAM THE OTHER NIIIIIIIIGHT
On one hand, the game's not perfect and there is room for improvement. On the other hand, I don't trust modern Ubisoft to do that.
literally reheated slop
>Remaking a FRICKING AC GAME
Jesus, this is like remaking fifa 15
>this is like remaking fifa 15
but they did exactly that, after just one year even, and the year after, and the year after
Aren't they already making a pirate game? In fact, aren't they making 2?
The pirate game was in development hell for almost 10 years, so I doubt Ubisoft is expecting for it to even break even, let alone make profit
It's funny because they still haven't released that pirate game which is just black flag's boat comabt
Why not just make a black flag sequel?
>playing as Edward as an actual fully fledged Master Assassin in London
>the final mission is his last stand in his mansion where he dies and Haytham is turned into a Templar
Modern Ubisoft would frick it up. Remember the last two games where you visited England were Syndicate and Valhalla, and neither were exactly good
Finally, Edward will be a lovable Black swashbuckler dismantling the ebin patriarchal Templars! Kino alert!
i only ever played AC1 and AC Black Flag , gotta say I enjoyed Black Flag (but obviously I didnt have AC fatigue ), sometimes I would walk on the coast of those small islands with treasure chest and look at the sea and sky horizon , it was during hot summer
Why the actual shit is THAT the game they've decided to remake and not AC2 which would've actually benefitted from it?
I don't understand why so many companies just can't make good products anymore, and then get surprised when everything is failing
because ac2 doesnt have boats in it my guy
nobody wants the first iteration of "LE EPIB DOUBLE HIDDEN BLADE KILLS!!!" again in better fidelity
tell me what ac2 would benefit from a remake
>AC2 which would've actually benefitted from it
Already got remastered alongside 3.
The "Remake of 4" is going to be a remaster
Because everyone's been asking for a pirate game forever, and Ubisoft knows that Skull & Bones is going to be absolute trash, so they're doing the easiest and quickest thing by just crapping out a remaster of the existing pirate game for guaranteed sales.
I have never played a single one of these games. If I were to only play one, which should it be?
AC2 or Black Flag
First game is decent, despite what some people say.
Depends, what are you looking for? If it's an actual Assassin's Creed game then don't listen to anyone else and go with AC1: it's the purest one in its formula. If you're looking for whatever Ubisoft open world then go with the one that has the historical setting you like.
ELDEN RING REMAKE WHEN????????
Fromsloppers should just remake dark 1-3 instead of making new game every year
They don't make new games every year anyway
I thought they had remade 1 but have been sitting on it
Finally true king of game industry is back with a bang, gaming is saved
Everyone will be black, ugly and a troony.
REMINDER
At this point, I'd prefer an Amerindian to an AmeriBlack person.
It's two white guys. I don't understand.
Connor's a mutt
shit. it's like watching the evolution of the united states in real-time. all went from regal-looking aryan kings to simple flat-nosed Black person mutts.
Black gay probably has the nicest, juiciest, wettest-looking water I've ever seen in a video game.
I always disliked how he jumped into the water with his bulky ass clothes. I usually wore the shark/whale hunting gear for that reason.
It's wild how badly Ubisoft fumbled the success of Black Flag. All they had to do was copy Pirates! with the same engine and BOOM: solid gold. Instead they do frick all until a competitor comes out 5 years later, then you decide it's time to enter development hell with your new pirate game and you STILL don't know what made Black Flag good.
That's why they want to remake Black Flag, so it can do well again and they can have another attempt to capitalize on its success.
>another demake
ok who are they turning black and or a troony?
or based things they'll remove
predictions
>who are they turning black and or a troony?
The latter for Rackam and Mary
>based things they'll remove
?t=3
Can't have an adult conversation regarding race in our historical fiction game
They are going to butch that conversation
This shit doesnt matter, you can give re4 demake a troony paint job but if it played like a sequel to 5 instead of Last of us it would be far superior.
Mechanics matter MECHANICS
Why didn't they ever make the straight pirate game they said they were going to make
They've been trying, anon...
>"The game began development in 2013, being initially envisioned as an expansion of Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag, then an MMO spinoff title under the name Black Flag Infinite. It was then spun off as an independent project, in part due to its initial technology becoming outdated"
>"It was revealed during Ubisoft's press conference at E3 2017. It was confirmed for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One"
...for a long fricking time
I dont mind it because blackflag was really good so this is actually great news
Frick 3, 4, and Rogue for their shit awful combat and terrible collectathons
>shit awful combat and terrible collectathons
But enough about Brotherhood
I kind of like collecting things in these games. It's a cheap and easy way to make players explore the world, but it does the job. Though going to all the little islands to get a chest or animus fragment in Black Flag was a chore. A few was fine, but it gets old fast.
This makes no fricking sense to me
>Dead Space Remake
Easy proof of concept to see if people wanted more Dead Space and was a great opportunity for a new development team to get their beak wet on their first solo project.
>REmake 4
Resident Evil but you can walk and aim now pretty much sells itself.
>FF7
Again, Final Fantasy 7 but with Kingdom Hearts gameplay sells itself
>Demon Souls
no one played the original and its stuck on a console from two gens ago
But what the frick can do you with a Black Flag remake? Make it an RPG like the new ones no one likes?
>might live long enough to see remakes of remakes
We're already seeing that with the Doom 2016 remaster.
>Doom 2016 remaster.
Huh?
It's only a matter of time before we get a re-remake of Resident Evil.
so Last of us ? they remaster it and then remake it
Nah like, full on remake of a full remake.
christ. i'll never forget that one. left=cute as a button. wholesome and innocent. righ=fugly as frick. evil demon!!!! burn in hell, b***h!!!!!!
Does FF1 count?
I have remake exhaustion.
>AssCreed remake
hahahahaHAHAHAHAHA
We came full circle
I guess I'm glad Matt Ryan gets more work, but it's such an inconsequential AC, it's so weird they chose this one of all of them.
>Reusing Skull&Bones stuff
Yeah, that's probably the reason.
I wonder why nautical settings are so underutilized. The lasting popularity of this game and the Master and Commander movie's cult following shows there's a dedicated audience.
funny how all the good games nowadays are remakes. not that this ubi trash will be good
Far Cry 3 remake when?
>Sexy ladies are now ugly
>No more destructable foliage
>Jason no longer plays white savior
>Physics replaced with that of the new ones
>Looks worse than the original
Thanks for posting the link homosexual
zoomerslop back on the menu
>people buy remasters
>they make more remasters
>people buy even more remasters
What did you guys expect? Modern gaming is so bad people prefer to buy old games, and companies give people what they want.
Where the frick is that actual pirate game they were making even at
AC4 graphics are still good. Remake it is fricking stupid
add random troony characters, sanitize the script and any spicy moments the original had, and use the anti-fun, imprecise climbing system that's been in place since AC origins without improvements? no thanks
>add random troony characters
really anon? are you forgetting a certain famous female pirate that spent half the game posing as a man?
Mary crossdressed (at first) because female sailors were a ridiculous idea, but she wasn't a troony. She was a woman posing as a man for gain. That said, I could totally see them doing that.
I was more thinking of random side characters, quest givers etc. And let's not forget obligatory race-swapping. Also does anyone know if "blind" used figuratively triggers sensitivity readers already? The level of sanitation going on in the production of modern triple ayy games has got to be pretty high at this point
>obligatory race-swapping
Of all the AC games, Black Flag would be the strangest choice for that. So many of the side characters (and crowd NPCs) are already not white, and the main characters are mostly historical figures. They could do it with the British and Spanish sailors, though I don't know how diverse their navies actually were at the time.
Meanwhile Dark Souls is on it's third version.
Rogue is better than Black Flag.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
you shouldnt legally be allowed to remake a game that was released less than 20 years ago
i actually just replayed this recently, really does not need a remake at all lmao.
people forget but this game was a launch title on ps4. It also ran on previous gen but not well.
why are we remaking games from just the previous gen? Are they gonna remake God of war as well now lmao
>spend so long fumbling the follow up that you can just now do a remake of the original
Incredible.
>remake
>AKA the AAA industry has zero new ideas please buy our rehash shovel-ware made by plugging modern UE with soulless higher res assets created by pajeet sweatshops.
Black Flag is 8 years old
i cant wait for all the pirates to be trans Black folk and obese women
the shanties can all be songs by lil yachty
Kpop girl!
what's her fav assassin's creed?
FFFFFFFFFRICK YEAHHHH god I fricking hope they dont suck dick thos time, like with 3rd remake
>ubi remakes black flag
>they will undoubtedly make the combat, parkour, characters and sailing worse
What's even the point?
Literally impossible to make the combat worse.
>another 2013 game remake
So what's next?
GTA V Remake?
Tomb Raider 2013 Remake?
Bioshock Infinite Remake?
Battlefield 4 Remake?
Man, these 2013 retro games just play and feel radically different from modern games. And the graphics! So outdated that a remaster isn't enough anymore - we NEED remakes!
>Metro 2033 Redux Remastered: Definitive Edition (2024) 2
At least metro guys are good at it. Exodus is the only game on consoles that has rtx on and 60 fps on series fricking s
>At least metro guys are good at it.
Lol dude have you played the first two remastered metro games? They run like garbage even on higher end computers that should be able to max out their settings no problem.
not the guy you're replying to but they run at 1080p @ 60 fps even on a base xbone
Infinite remake with the story reworked by someone not moronic would be great.
ive never played this game before but I heard its like the best assassin's creed game. Hope it gets released on the PS5 too
It might well be the best game in the Assassin's Creed series, but if you're after an "Assassin's Creed" game for everything that the series is best known for, it falls a bit flat. It plays like one, but there's only one really proper city and like half the main missions are tailing some butthole or walking along while someone spouts exposition. Fine pirate game, though, and honestly most of the Assassin's Creed stuff is to the game's detriment (though it is worked into the story well).
The only reason I could think of for a Black Flag remake is if they fix they godawful optimization issues where it runs like ass on high settings even if you've got a PC that far exceeds all of the requirements. And maybe updating the ship combat so it's actually more like AC3 ship combat instead of the dumbed-down shit that Black Flag gave us. Other than that I don't see any reason for a remake since the visuals are fine not amazing or anything like Arkham Knight but still decent.
Knowing Ubisoft they'll just make everything worse and more woke.
>STILL can't sail bigger ships
dogshit game
Peak remake culture
>Adewale is now a troony because of ayy machine
>Edward fricks Adewale
>Adewale gives birth via chestburst
>new asscreed storyline featuring other Kenways other than Haytham
>implying it won't sinply let you choose Edward's sex (but it's now canon Edward is a woman) and she gets Adewale as a lover
>Edward and Adewale get together
>Adewale, being black, leaves Edward once she's pregnant with Haytham
when Jedi: Survivor remake?
If they're gonna remake anything it should be either AC1 or 2 not stupid fricking overrated Black Flag, frick this gay earth
AC multiplayer was kino why did it die so fast?
Because it got worse with each game adding in horrible features like Contested Kills, constant buffs to the Pistol while they constantly nerfed stuff like Smoke Bombs or Charge, focus on balancing for the worst game modes (The FFA kill ones and the CTF ones) instead of the ones that multiplayer is clearly designed around (Manhunt), maps that got so bad you could barely even hide in them without instantly starting a high profile chase or immediately getting spotted, and more.
The only good multiplayer was Brotherhood's, as soon as Rev came out it went down the crapper because the Pistol was already getting buffed to high heavens, and then 3 and BF made it even worse with their maps and buffs for rooftop runners.
>go into the multiplayer expecting stealth kino
>get codkiddies just running and gunning everywhere
🙁
I played it this year and thought it held up fine.
I'm happy for other people getting to play it though.
Better get rid of the ugly ass blowpipe
Friendly reminder that the profit margins for Ubisoft are so thin that if you wait until the first discount you can both legally own and play the game while causing Ubisoft to lose money if you absolutely need your Ubislop. Valhalla had a 30% discount on PC and 25% discount on playstation after less than 40 days.
sure, but these games often sell enough during the first month that they recoup their costs and investments on them. any money after that is just good old pure profit. and they also sell a lot of complete editions for up to 30 bucks or more a year later when all the dlc has come out. and that's also something a lot of people buy. so again, that's just pure profits on ubisoft's part. don't believe the hype, they've got enough moolah, they're not hurting for money. and if they are, it's because of stupid shit like skull and crossbones and other crap games that should never have been allowed to be made.
You NEVER play an Ubisoft game upon release. Always wait 6~12 months because it will be a glitched buggy mess upon release, has been the case since AC3. Especially more so if you wait for 1 year because they'll release a version with all the DLC for a lower price than the day one price.
You are correct, my post was aimed towards the people who are desperate for an ubisoft game on release.
>Always wait 6~12 months because it will be a glitched buggy mess upon release
Valhalla still has bugs that were present from launch despite two years of support and bug fixes. The promised New Game + feature was also never delivered. Ubisoft is getting worse.
Remake? Really? Whats the point when every AC plays about the same?
Aren't you glad you baught your shiny brand new PS5 to play new games such as Demon Souls, GTA5, Resident Evil 4, The Last of Us 1, Dead Space, Assassin's Creed 4, Red Dead Redemption?
lel
its time
why the frick don't they just remake all the games starting from the first one? and then also fix the fricked up story and continuity errors and such, while they are at it?
Ubisoft is never ever gonna touch AC1. There's a reason it's the only game that hasn't been remastered or re-released or anything. Ass Creed as it exists might as well have started with AC2, AC1 is such a different beast it doesn't align with Ubisoft's goals since 2009. They'll milk Altair's appearance for all it is worth but they'll never touch the game itself. And that's a good thing, leave the good first game alone
They also never even bothered to give it achievements/trophies unlike all the others.
No Assassin's Creed game needs a remake yet, not even 1.
You know what completely and utterly ruins this game? The long, unskippable, pointless and demoralizing IRL segments.
Based
I wish AC just fricking get rid of them already. They've been pointless since 3
>They've been pointless since 1
Fixed that for you.
They had some reason to be there at least back when ac actually had narrative to tell, but now its just the equivalent of filler
1 was the only game where they made the most sense. And the whole conspiracy shit helped make it more interesting. It's clear that after 2 they stopped giving a shit when they booted the original writer guy.
But those were interesting because we got to see the internal workings and propaganda of Abstergo and the Templars. We also get to see IRL dev shitposting in the datalogs.
They weren’t interesting at all. The only time that shit has been interesting was when Desmond was around and everyone learned their lesson about being interested when Ubisoft killed him off because they know having a conclusion to their stupid story kills the cash train.
At least it's a game that everyone actually liked.
Kidd is no longer a woman in disguise, but is now directly called "trans" in the game.
Enjoy your remake.
Who're you kidding? They'll learn more towards the "possible relationship" between Bonny and Read rather than being trans.
All Ubisoft had to do was make another pirate game that was like Black Flag without the Assassin's Creed lore. I don't know why they are being so fricking obtuse and releasing shit like Skull and Bones and now a Black Flag remake.
Will they fix the horrendous dogshit ground combat?
They should make the story not shit for starters. But seriously when the frick are they going to bring back ACB online? What the frick was even the point of pulling the servers offline if you didn't have a replacement?? game was fairly active on PC.