>RTX 4070TI 12gb
>I7 9700k OC'd @ 5GHz
>32gb RAM
And I still can't run this bullshit with max settings and Path Tracing at 60 FPS. It's even more egregious when you realise all this shit cost me like $2,500. This is why consoles are still superior to PC gayming
because your CPU doesn't even meet the minimum requirements you moron, how the frick do you pair a GPU like that with a 9th gen CPU, to back to consoles
yikes umm sweaty, this is a very take! Let's unpack this
>The game came out at the same time as the 9700k did
>My GPU has 99% utilisationon
>I'm running 2k resolution which means it's GPU based, not CPU based like 1080p
You need to learn more about PCs before you embarrass yourself with these posts
That game is poorly optimized, also 4K is a meme.
OP thought i7 meant it was immediately gonna be better than an i5
My father was a computer scientist; highly gifted in his work. I asked him what it would cost to build this today with 256MB of VRAM. I shall never forget his answer.
>We can't. We don't know how.
>i7 9700kf
I have the same CPU... bought it with a 2070 Super like 3 and a half years ago to build a PC as strong or stronger than the next gen consoles... it cost twice the price of a PS5.
Today my PS5 runs Cyberpunk better than my PC.
I am going back to consoles.
>Today my PS5 runs Cyberpunk better than my PC.
Sad as frick. FYI I built my 9700k rig specifically to play Cyberpunk when it came out. I had an RTX 2080 included. This was back when the only 'better' card was the 2080ti.
It's sad that $2000+ hardware struggles to run stuff on high at 60 FPS
>i built my 9700k rig specifically to play Cyberpunk
You and me both friend... there was very little fuzz going on about ray tracing and I could get 60 fps on Ultra in 1080p no problem... with the 2.0 update my performance went to shit.
Do you have RT switched on? Maybe 2.0 enhanced the game graphically
Nah
No, it is off.
Don't know what happens, I get dips into 50-43 fps whenever I am in an area with a lot of npcs or when I am driving...
Using DF's optimized settings, something close to Medium-High preset, 1440p with DLSS quality.
I don't know, it could be the CPU in my case.
>DLSS quality.
Swap to Balanced man it will help FPS. Maybe turn Frame Gen on. But idk if 2070 Super can do it
It is ok, I bought it on console after I saw some performance reviews... it runs at 1440p 60fps on the PS5, dips occur on a few heavy areas but it never goes lower than 50 apparently.
The PS5 is pretty cost effective all things considered. PC gaming is just a rip off at the moment
Yeah until it overheats from extended use and you have to do a warranty claim or just pay to have it repaired. Never had a single issue with my graphics cards overheating and breaking. The only exception is that one time in 2008 when Nvidia sent out a shitty patch which fricked up the fan on my 8800 GT and broke it.
>RTX 2080
>9700k
Damn, guess I won't buy this game until I upgrade to the 5000 series. I have the same CPU/GPU as you but I have a 1440p/144hz monitor if that makes a difference or not.
You can play the game with an I7 9700k and an RTX 2080. Just not max Ray Tracing. DLSS on Performance and mid tier RT will get you at least 40 FPS
Samegay
consoles do not run it on max you absolute moron
Then what do they run it on? PS5 runs excellent with RT too and costs like $500
Not path traced you moronic frick. Even a 4090 struggles to run it path traced. Run it with regular ray tracing, mixed settings and dlss if you want the PS5 experience.
The Path Tracing setting is literally listed as an experimental. It's not a sensible standard by which to judge current hardware. Even when running at a higher fps on a 4090 there's odd smearing around moving NPCs and faces
>on a 4090
Funny, even the 4090 can't do 4k @ 60 FPS with Path Tracing and DLAA. Imagine a literal $2,000 card not being able to 100 FPS+ the current games.
>it runs at 1440p 60fps on the PS5, dips occur on a few heavy areas but it never goes lower than 50 apparently
Imagine spending $120 on a game for slightly better reflections at 50fps when you could be playing it on 1440p 120fps with dlss 3.5
?si=KtfbTS5HLVzzd1JS
Literal turd world monkey lol. Stick to consoles and controller aim loser.
Yes. OP is one of the moronic fricks who actually bought 40 series.
Malding
I'm not the one who spent $2500 on a pc they don't even like lol.
Nah I'm chilling on high 1440p ~100fps with my 6700 xt because I don't need stupid lighting gimmicks for an already great looking game.
How to spot poorgays who can't afford a new GPU
Woah, modern hardware can't do real time path tracing? No way!
>9700k
Don't make me laugh
>Don't make me laugh
CPU is still good in today's market, especially when it's OC'd. >inb4 some Reddit bottleneck shit
>path tracing
lmao is that the new gimmick to sell overpriced dog shit gpus?
PC gaming is mostly second class now. That you can actually do things like work on a pc is its only saving grace.
So second class that it gets every "exclusive" in existence less than 2 years after they release, either legitimately or via emulation. Meanwhile PS5 doesn't even have VRR for most monitors, themes, a web browser or working headphone drivers. Simply lol. Enjoy your second class experience and 3 month exclusives.
That don't work properly lol you certainly told me!
I must ask, do you pay for your sloppy seconds knowing the publishers are just milking their games as they no longer make money on the main platform or do you pirate your sloppy seconds?
>That don't work properly lol you certainly told me!
Citation needed [x]
>do you pirate your sloppy seconds?
I pirate them unlike you, homosexual OP, who buys them twice in a row for an inferior experience on console. LOL!
Actually I don't play games
>RTX 4080
> AMD 7700X
>32gb ram
90+ fps maxed at 1440p
works on my 4070 just fine, getting around 70fps usually with a R5 5600x. If you turn off DLSS with path tracing though I get under 10fps, shit is legit magic and the only real noticeable graphical issue is some weird thing I've heard people describe as "shimmering" on distant objects notably buildings
turn on DLSS you fricking moron
2700x and 2080
Have no problem running the game.
Ofc you are gonna get stomoed when you use path tracing moron, it literally warns you that it is basically a tech demo setting.
I olay on high, with raytracing enabled.
I have rt mirrors, local shadows, and sun shadows. But rt lighting disabled.
(Dogtown runs like crap though)
Atleast the game pays for its fps in looks, unlike starfield.
i enjoyed the frick out of this game on my 5 year old gtx 1080 on medium-high settings, i dont know. consoles are not superior, you are just a homosexual who wants to consooom and have the newest thing and thats where your happiness plateaus, you did the equivalent of getting a gf but you only jerk off to her
Funny because I have a rig almost like yours (mines is slighly better) and i can run this game just fine.
Maybe you are trying to run it in 4K.
I am a 1080p chad and run all the games just ok
>consoles are superior!
>to make the game look fricking worse than this and at a lower framerate
>bro just use DLSS
This is not an acceptable option. It just isn't. Sorry.
>moron fell for the "4070 will run everything at x res" meme
always go for the best homosexual especially this fricking gen when 4090 destroys everything with raw power
>I 12700k
>RX 6800
>32 GB
>79 maxed out @2k
and I'm legit miring on Nvidia bros that can run path tracing because I can't at all.
works on my machine
3080 (not TI)
7950x
DLSS quality at 1.0 sharpness
No raytracing (it is a meme)
100+ fps on 4k
Stop being poor
captain bottleneck over there, probably doesn't update bios either
>probably doesn't update bios either
Yeah, you're right. If it ain't broke don't fix it. BIOs is the easiest thing to break
>i can't build a pc
>i can't price compare
>i can't optimize settings
>i can't get over 60fps as a result
>therefore the better option is the overpriced box that isn't optimize and can't get over 30fps without path tracing at all!
i took your bait, well done op
>9700k
You are one dumb Black person.
>You are one dumb Black person.
why
You're pairing a 1000€ GPU with an old as frick CPU that gets mogged by a modern i3 that costs like 90€, that's why.
CPUs havent advanced that much and there is no bottleneck at 1440p
They tripled the requirements and everyone lapped it up. Now other devs are following suit so get used to it.
>This is why consoles are still superior to PC gayming
This is bait, sage.
12700 non k
32gb ddr4 3200
3060 215+/+1050
Runs max at 4k balanced.
Better than fricking consoles and my PC was only a 150 dollars more than a series x.
It is the first game where my 10700k is a bottleneck for 3080. 9700k is 5 years old, its just not enough for this game
>rtx 4090
>i9 13900kf
>32gb ddr5-6400
>3440x1440
>crank it to max with no dlss
60-80 fps
>with dlss on auto
160fps
>add AI frame generation bullshit
240fps
>dlss off+path tracing
still 60fps so either path tracing is a spook or it's a cpu issue
In any case this game is a great AI showcase.