>player shows up to the first session dressed like this
what do?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>player shows up to the first session dressed like this
>player shows up to the first session dressed like this
what do?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
expect ripping off his dress and railing him on the table over all figures and dice
im sorry to say anons that person is not trans. just a normal woman
I'm deeply confused by what part of
led you to believe that I thought she was trans.
>them
>they
>them
>"why do you think I'm a lefty trans fetishist?"
The use of “they” as an indeterminate third-person singular pronoun predates whatever culture war brainrot you’ve been infected by.
Don't be a passive aggressive queen.
>The use of “they” as an indeterminate third-person singular pronoun predates whatever culture war brainrot you’ve been infected by.
By like 700 years also.
Not really
>They with a singular antecedent goes back to the Middle English of the 14th century[35][36]
Meds.
>wikipedia
Do you have autism? Genuine question.
>AXKSHUALLY there was a single example of this in an obscure esoteric church text penned by Delusionosius Rex in 1351
>therefore it's normative since then to use singular they unrestrictively in the year of our lord 2010+14
Tell us more about the trashcan of ideology out of which you eat.
Shakespeare did it so it's been normative for hundreds of years. Just not as long as anon thinks.
No, moron, the idiocy here is the idea that someone using something in a very specific and restrictive context somehow means that it's somehow in common unrestricted use.
It doesn't matter if Shakespeare used it a few times. It doesn't matter that some monk used it the first time 700 or 800 or 10 000 years ago. It's like me slapping my girlfriend, and then some morons show up half a millennia later and say that all women should have the shit beaten out of them non-stop, because anon slapped his girlfriend once so it's OK!
Fricking. morons.
>centuries old grammar is suddenly bad because someone I don't like uses it
Frankly, yes, that's correct.
So you're just moronic and willfully cede ground to people you claim to despise without a fight
Literally all my life I said singular they is moronic and I don't give a shit who uses it for what purpose and how long it's been around. It's an unclear turn of phrase with clearer and shorter and more often used alternatives.
Unclear wording is bad wording, any sentence where you could use a gendered pronoun would be improved by using it instead. I don't care about trannies and I still hate it.
you are objectively wrong and moronic
get over it
"Hey, do you know who's car this is?"
"No, I do not."
"Well if they don't move their car they are going to end up with a ticket."
A sentence where you do not know the gender of someone is not a sentence where you can use a gendered pronoun instead. Just like when talking about "someone" or "anybody".
Why are you misreading my post then getting mad at your delusion of what I said, anon? You seem very angry?
>Moves their goalposts.
You are dumb Anon. Very dumb. Your parents, they would be ashamed if they knew how dumb you are.
Perhaps they know.
A future wife you may have, they would be repulsed. Your future kids, ashamed.
So what is the "clearer and shorter and more often used alternative" to use in that situation?
Spell the words out of my first post, read what was written very carefully, then formulate your sentence more clearly.
>Your parents, they would be ashamed if they knew how dumb you are.
>A future wife you may have, they would be repulsed.Your future kids, ashamed.
Would my supposed parents be repulsed if I had a supposed future wife, my future wife be repulsed about me moving the goalpost, my future wife and my parents be repulsed of each other, or are you referring to my supposed future children from the next sentence, or actually all of my supposed extended family? Because all of those are grammatically correct interpretations.
Thank you for showcasing how stupid it is to use in a real sentence, you basically have to work around the pronoun to make it clear who or what and how many you're talking about.
Why are you confused?
You said there was a better word, a claim which I directly quoted, and I asked what it is
Surely you have an answer
Again, read what I said, frame your question more clearly. I am not confused, I just think you are too dumb to have properly read my post.
>Thank you for showcasing how stupid it is to use in a real sentence, you basically have to work around the pronoun to make it clear who or what and how many you're talking about.
Doesn't matter. Stop being a gay.
>This use of singular they had emerged by the 14th century, about a century after the plural they.[4][5][2] It has been commonly employed in everyday English ever since and has gained currency in official contexts. Singular they has been criticised since the mid-18th century by prescriptive commentators who consider it an error.
Based Medieval chroniclers > prissy Georgian homosexuals
>A sentence where you do not know the gender of someone is not a sentence where you can use a gendered pronoun instead
Singular they was first introduced into the dictionary during 18th century England...
Close, 17th century They was added and it was meant to replace thee, thy, and thou depending on context, it isn't until the 18th century when academics started to debate if they should be only plural or plural or single and the debate has raged on ever since...
Maybe to get over this gender bullshit we should go back to using thee, thy, and thou?
>It's an unclear turn of phrase
Yes
>with clearer and shorter and more often used alternatives.
Untrue.
>Unclear wording is bad wording
That is not how the English use English.
It's almost as if people not in your cult are capable of employing context clues over text-based mediums
Did you know that you can only kiss your reflection on the lips?
why would you ever kiss your reflection
If you did you could only kiss it on the lips
my reflection has good taste
Yes, but not in unrestricted usage. moron.
I find it very funny that chuds think calling trans people "they" is lefty talk and lefties think calling trans people "they" is chud talk
It's the centrist response. Not deliberately rude but also not feeding the delusion, while also infuriating both kinds of culture war idiot.
Very based.
>newbies don't know about pluralis majestatis
>idiot is confused about the English language
"Them" is perfectly normal to refers to a person who is either undetermined or whose sex you don't know, you absolute mongrel of a c**t
wtf
That's somehow worse.
still p rapeable
Lmao you think that will stop me? I'd frick her butthole while calling her a troony homosexual and slapping her breasts insisting theyre fake.
>go to /tg/ to escape the chasers on /lgbt/ coomposting about wanting to frick people like me
>immediately run into chaser posting hot degrading stuff
I can't win can I
>I can't win can I
No. You get two and only two options when you chose to be even remotely feminine. Suicide or sex object. Be a good girl and choose the latter.
>people like me
being gay doesn't make you abnormal anon
Yes it does. homosexuals and homosexualry is not normal, and it never will be.
There is nothing normal about her.
kek, this certainly put a smile on my face, thank you anon
call the local asylum and ask if have any escapees recently
>just a normal woman
normal women dont get about with a dead bird on their head you fricking homosexual
Seriously just look at the hands. Femboys have glorious long thin fingers and women have gross stubby fat fingers.
BASED
"to those who would equate the desire to lewd a dude till both perspire.
please expire."
Work with them to get more appropriate feathers for next time. It’s a cute look, but doesnt quite match any of the birdfolk in the setting. I also warn them that my husband has an insatiable lust for birdfolk and so they should keep an eye on that.
what makes you think he's dressing based on the game?
>The whole point of RPGs is to separate reality to a different, more fun, alternative world. Play someone else through our sheer immagination. Go back to your troony pride parade.
>The whole point of RPGs is to separate reality to a different, more fun, alternative world.
>separate reality to a different, more fun, alternative world.
>player shows up to the first session dressed like this
And what pray tell, do you think this person is doing?
Do you lack any self-awareness, or are you just pretending to be moronic?
>player shows up
Already top of the field.
While your commitment is awesome, don't think your character is above death. I'll give you a pass this time, but next time slowly build up your props.
No, I'll dress however I want. My clothing has nothing to do with your game.
I'd remind her Githyanki are not a part of my setting.
Put on my Inquisitor robes, and introduce this degenerate to the Emeperor's Mercy.
Is the Emperor's Mercy what you call your penis?
Prometheum is cheaper than Bolter rounds Inquisitior. Let them burn.
>I appreciate the enthusiasm but I thought I told you we're playing Vampire, not Changeling.
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
Put down tarp
I would rather frick tiktok goat than tiktok owl.
Also anyone who shows up in costume gets double XP obviously.
Depends on how convincing the goat legs are.
But, anon, fricking a tiktok owl would be a hoot.
autistic women are built for rough sex
I get it. There is just something really wrong about owl girl. I cringe just thinking about it
Long time ago a played a Lich who would regularly not move for hours, days or even weeks on end. Whenever i went out to get something i'd leave a plastic skull at my spot at the table. If i couldn't make a session the GM would put the skull there for me and tell me if anything happened that he would have bothered to pay attention to. Sometimes i'd get stoned and just sit at the table with a dollar store Halloween mask, sometimes i'd fall asleep and no one would notice..
did you mean to reply to a different thread?
A full costume?
As an adult it only happened once, I quit that game because it was boring and not because the person in cosplay was annoying, I guess it must suck to dress for your games only for no players to have any semblance of chemistry and a rather passive aggressive DM that expects too much from the players
My frame of reference is small, I was never surrounded by turbo weirdos growing up, worst offenders were
>a friend with an eye patch and his parrot, the parrot was funny since it interrupted the game a lot to call us "maricas" and said "nalgas" and "ora verga" a lot
>One guy with a bandana and a plushie for an animal companion
>One girl with a plushie for a familiar
>A shirtless guy roleplaying a barbarian
>Same shirtless guy now with a monkey mask that had to reroll two sessions in to another more normal character because he got vaporised by a trap
Just normal shit for a bunch of guys having fun as kids
Parrot called you a gay in your face and you were amused by it?
kek
Once we were having a pretty dull session so I made a robot hat out of a pile of discarded cardboard boxes in the backroom of the gamestore we were playing in.
I want to KISS that owl.
I haven't talked to a living girl in like 8 years. I wouldn't care if she was dressed like that.
>living girl.
I ment in real live. I'm not a murderer btw.
We got em.
The really worrying part of this sentence is "living".
I'm not murderer. Live girls just don't talke to me.
Holy shit dude.
?
but the dead ones do? what are you smoking anon.
I'm not smoking.
I'm not murderer. I don't know how many times I have to say
I can see why the living ones don't talk to you, you type like a serial killer.
THERE'S NO PAIN AND THERE'S NO PRESSURE, NO VERBAL HUMILIATION. THERE'S NO FEAR, THERE'S NO SHAME
THERE"S NO PULSE, SO IS IT SO STRANGE?
?
I see you voltairebro
SO HELP ME JESUS
>Live
Anon? Do dead ones do?
Anon please get rid of the dead hooker in your closet.
She's an escort.
How has the smell not gotten to you yet?
>anoooooooooon
>rooooooooll for initiatiiiiiiiiive
Hmm. It would be cool to frick her ass and make her makeup run.
I would with no hesitations or regrets
Breed her, she looks hot as frick and made for impregnation
Ask them why they didn't tell me they were going to dress up, it's rather surprising.
Ask why they are dressed like that, and then proceed to either run the game or ask them to leave.
Probably the latter, because dressing up like that is stupid, but I'll leave enough slack for then to convince me it was some silly joke and won't happen again.
sexually assault they/them into submission, and establishing they/them as the group catamite
That isn't me, and nobody else would be interested in my games.
But on the off chance someone actually would be, I would ask if they feel confident that they know the basic rules relevant to their character's abilities, and would encourage them to ask any questions they have.
Funnily enough this might be enough to break someone like her. E-thots will crumble the nanosecond they realize that they'd have to actually take the hobby seriously. Playing dress up, while fun, is not the experience anyone who actually plays the game wants to have.
Recently I seem to be gradually losing the ability to imagine fictional women. The behavior of real women keeps intruding into my imagination. I've avoided them as much as possible but they bring their bullshit brainrot demands into every hobby and my exposure has finally piled up to the point I can't even imagine women any other way anymore. I've started removing woman characters from my solo campaign gradually but I am not enjoying it anymore.
I've been thinking about just digging myself a nice deep grave out in the woods, way off any trails where no feminist will ever venture, making myself a nice little marker, rigging up the soil to fall with something like a torch burning through a rope, something elegant you know, and just leaving things here.
Since it will be just me and no one else in my lifetime will likely discover the grave or be troubled by it, I was thinking of using some sort of plants to be old-fashioned. I wonder if maybe a combination of "shrooms" and a lot of hemlock leaves would take me out of it enough to not have to experience the suffocation if I timed it right.
seek help
A therapist isn't going to change other people.
They literally will.
Let me elaborate. Standard modern therapy practices combined with psychological medications have manufactured and/or enabled the kinds of people I am tempted to kill myself to avoid since long before I was even born.
Big ups to my man Gert Postel.
An honest psychiatrist is a broke psychiatrist, psychiatrists currently grow successful and respected by flattering and enabling insecure narcissism without ever working on making the person more bearable, rather than working on "building confidence" (which 9/10 times actually just creates more aggressive insecure narcissists who will screech that anyone who is honest with them is gaslighting them and attacking their vaunted positive self-image).
Therapy resets people to be well-adjusted to a system of subjective, vacuous theoretical ethics centered around innate, unacknowledged, petty misanthropy and crybullying.
Therapy foments fricked-up young adults malnourished on a media diet of rebels-without-a-cause and rage against propagandized injustices with no time spared to verify or consider their emotionally mandated stances into wholly unbearable and unstable people who no longer act like people at all.
Modern therapy and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human species (industrialization on the other hand solved more problems than it created)
You are right about everything except the part about industrialization.
>bro doesn’t know about exit bags
Ngngmi
Also have you tried just importing from fiction? Plenty of non terminally current year women in the imaginary world (and irl too, but you clearly have way too many issues to see them)
That leaves a mess behind for other people, you missed the point.
I could try rereading some old novels for a refresher, I guess.
>Plenty of non terminally current year women in the imaginary world (and irl too, but you clearly have way too many issues to see them)
lol
(lol)
[kek]
{haha}
<jej>
I just think cosplaying is neat.
yeah idk what is going on with the rest of these replies but I feel like I would be happy someone is putting so much effort into a game of mine? I feel like this is the same as somebody who draws moments from the session and like art of the characters or stuff like they're putting in a ton of effort. Genuinely insane how people see someone put effort into something that isn't crunching numbers and think the person must not know the rules or is bad at the game or whatever, and im a number cruncher. Really makes me see how negative this board likes to be about random shit. It would be really extra if I hadn't met the person before though
based
The only people left on this board are joyless, pre-suicide depressives who are on a hair trigger ready to interpret anything they see in the worst possible light. I recommend bailing or you'll get infected with this shit. Ganker isn't worth it.
And go...where?
Rather than running, try being the change you want to see. Make quality threads. Engage in quality discussions.
nah, I'll just talk to people in real life, thanks. hopefully Ganker runs out of money to pay for its servers soon.
Pull her in close for a kiss, turn her around, pull down her underwear, and bend her over the game table.
I think she'd be pretty shocked that her TV/streamer version of DnD is not really how we play. But if she put that much effort in, I would be really happy and a bit sad that she did all that and nobody else did.
It would sort of depend how she acted from then on out. I don't think she'd fit in with our pretty beer and pretzels level play, but maybe if she had a few friends who were as into it as her I'd set up another game (because I'm secretly desperate for a more roleplay heavy game but my friends are not that sort of people).
Overall, a bit weirded out, but not something I'd immediately hate. Hate would come with behaviour.
She doesn't watch tv or streamers.
be absolutely stoked to have a passionate autsit play my game
sit around dumbfounded trying to figure out how a woman and/or gay man found its way into my game
reject the player from my table, the entusiasms is impressive, but my feather allergy wouldn't allow this
rape
Realize that this player is trolling and rise to the challenge by simply ignoring this player's obvious trolling and playing everything casually yet seriously.
instruct her to not perch or shit on anything, and that my pet rat and ferrets are not food.
>be me
>It's 1992
>be 11 years old
>sitting down for class.
>Forgot pencil again.
>don't want to walk to the teachers desk in shame and borrow the "forget me not pencil".
>ask to borrow pencil from the quite girl sitting next to me.
>she hisses loudly like a cat instead of just saying no.
>wtf jpg.
>entire class calls her cat girl well into high-school.
It's odd innit that girls like that used to be made fun of but now they can be ethots that men jerk themselves silly over.
Anon, it wasn't that long ago that playing DnD, video games, and anime was social outcast-tier shit.
I know anon. Just funny how things be ya know. We truly do live in society.
deep down everyone just wants a girlfriend who's a little mentally ill
All women are at least a little mentally ill, the difference is if you get to know up from what her particular derangement is or if it comes up as a surprise later on.
Those kinds of girls became obese kpop stan lesbians/trannies. The egirls are something else.
If not for having artho/theatre-kid personality I'd really enjoy their artistry and costume creativity. So assuming they keep their behavior chill I'll enjoy it.
Yeah I remember everyone, even the chud teacher, teasing or sideline-being-amused-at-teasing of the lol random girl. Frankly the pop cultural dominion of those artho/theatre-kid types is them taking their vindictive revenge on us.
troony Janny, removing shit you don't want people to talk about does not make it magically go away forever.
How weird that they cut out my post, did a LARPer rape the janny or something
You impugned his imaginary copslay gf.
>copslay
>tfw no cop slaying gf
Feels bad
Whag anime?
Elfen Lied
Elfen Lied.
I miss Dan Kim.
Isn't there a scene in Akira that's exactly like this but without the naked girl?
I get my breastplate and cloak.
I'd be flattered they went through the trouble for my game. Maybe a little nervous it wasn't going to live up to their expectations, since they are clearly pretty invested in things.
Ask him if he got a cloaca. Whatever he answer just call him a homosexual and kick him out.
>him
where do I begin to learn makeup and cosplay like op's image?
Would not give a shit, as long as they're a good roleplayers that's all that matters to me.
Do the legs go all the way?
Buddy, this is a cyberpunk game, if you're going to dress up at least do something fitting
What system?
sex
Bit weird but I appreciate the enthusiasm
This tbh. It would make me uncomfortable but I'd appreciate the effort. Assuming it wasn't some weird fetish thing anyway.
Kick them out for being a furry prostitute.
A woman does not put this much effort into something unless its a fetish or they believe it will benefit them directly in some way.
>A woman does not put this much effort into something unless its a fetish
Well in that case I am intrigued
>they believe it will benefit them directly in some way.
She's a LARPer and a regular at a fantasy based costumed ball. Her potion seller outfit here has always popped up in an Aussie DnD themed YouTube channel.
Same.
>What do?
Be happy the player showed up at all.
I don't recall allowing anyone to play a Gloura
I think it's cool that some people love tabletop games so much and get into that they'll show up to a game dressed in character.
I ask how far down the feathers go.
Absolutely BUILT for cosplay sex, even if it's a girl.
>You will never have sex with a femboy with tons of deer makeup on.
>use them or they in a sentence.
>troony troony REEEE LEFTIST troony
You homosexuals are peak tier morons.
run the game if you're the DM, create a character if you're a player.
>implying any of you losers got game
And I mean that in both ways.
No female will show up because there isn't a session. "World building" your autistic magic system and drow/orc variants and alternatives hasn't yielded a single piece of rule framework or stat block.
Instead she is in my place and we play Catan and then she sucks my wiener after getting drunk. Yeah she can keep the makeup on.
i am literally going to frick you
people seething about they as a pronoun is made even more funny when you realize that there are a number of languages that use it as the default to this day
>coward non-replier pretending he's not the one seething
I'd applaud her commitment while glazing at her almost transparent shirt
Its cute that she is presumably dressing up as her character, but I hope she doesent expect everyone else to do that sort of thing themselves.
commit romance
I never thought I'd have that moment on Ganker where someone would post a picture of a person I knew IRL, but here we are.
So did you clap those owl cheeks or what?
No, but I have slapped her breasts with a foam hammer if that counts.
I'll allow it.
They say such terrible things about a friend I grew up with, and considerably worse about his wife. I'd get so mad, even though we drifted apart. It's mostly just surreal that he's made it as far as he has at this point, though.
What friend? I want to talk shit about him to you.
Ask her how she plans to pay for the Exotic bioscuplting considering 90% of her budget went to covering her weekly kibble and Zetatech Neuralware implant
Kill the obvious fae
DEATH TO THE FAIR FOLK
Chainsaw my balls off while my players watch and throw darts at bare chest
The headdress on this costume is neat. I don't know how she controls the horns, but they add a lot to the theme.
>I don't know how she controls the horns,
Watch her hands. It's just a bit of string.
Why are you all so obsessed with this owl woman
Fluffy cloaca.
Spitting out feather pubes like a cartoon character dreaming about food and eating his pillow
My GM and I (when I GM) practice a strict vetting process so this is icing on the cake. They are clearly excited about the game and passionate about the hobby without the baggage that would have filtered them through the vetting process. I probably feel a little bad for not dressing up myself.
>hey are clearly excited about the game and passionate about the hobby without the baggage that would have filtered them through the vetting process. I probably feel a little bad for not dressing up myself.
It's pretty clear here their actual hobby is cosplay, then after that it's roleplaying (they'll try to be freeform), then somewhere down the bottom they may be interested in the game.
I would still enjoy playing with them, but would not expect them to be genuinely interested in any of the crunchier aspects.
barring the fact if they really didnt enjoy crunchier games, they wouldnt have made it past vetting, people can have more than one hobby that they are very passionate about. hobbies arent zero sum.
>barring the fact if they really didnt enjoy crunchier games, they wouldnt have made it past vetting
Yeah ok. Except you're describing a unicorn, and I'm presenting what this player will actually be like at the table.
I described no such thing. OP did not specify what this person is like, my interpretation of this person is exactly as valid as yours.