please let there be a PC release too, fricking please
https://twitter.com/RockstarGames/status/1688552977508806656?t=A8iIGRmvUShjdyTLvSIzDw&s=19
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Just emulate it via RPCS3 or XENIA
>b-but I can't my CPU is too dogshit!!!
ok just wait for the switch version to come out then emulate it on Yuzu kek
>no proper mouse support
Get the frick outta here
get a controller you frick
I have one and I dropped every single game that requires me to use it within like 2 hours because of how shit the controls feel.
>on a third person game
Why can’t you morons frick off, you’re like the people who complain about mouse controls on fps games.
here's the simple facts since you seem to struggle:
do you aim a gun in this game?
is it advantageous to shoot enemies in the head?
then the game is better with a mouse.
the exact perspective of the camera does not affect the above and you'd have to be some manner of moron to think it would.
more like:
Is the game one where you move and look around?
Then mouse is better
true if the camera control is properly implemented and the various action buttons translate acceptably to keyboard and mouse presses.
but some PC ports have really gnarly mouse aim with stuff like negative mouse acceleration where it's not always worth it.
nah my CPU is fine bit I also want to mod the shit out of this game and that's not easy with fricking disk images.
>Rockstar releases Red Dead on Switch before PC
its pretty fricking funny, haha. But PC will get the remake for 69.99$
yeah, not even a remaster, they want 50$ for it
Its just a straight port?
Jesus, they got so burned from the GTA demake they didnt even bothered with this one
It is, and it's 50 FRICKING DOLLARS
You can play the exact same thing on Xbox for 6$
LOL
I still have my old 360 copy around, would that work once I get an Xbox (planing to get one for Starfield anyway)
yes and it's probably more "enhanced" by the console than this shit, most compatible games seem to be
Xbox One X enhanced, so it will work best on that or an XSX. You're screwed if you have an XSS, since those can't run games in XBX enhanced mode.
>You can play the exact same thing on Xbox for 6$
I looked it up in my area and I can literally get an Xbox 360 WITH a copy of the game included for less than 50 dollars. This is a fricking joke, who is this meant for, the elusive Japanese Red Dead fanbase?
>who is this meant for, the elusive Japanese Red Dead fanbase?
Switch is not so surprising to me after Nintendo decided to port Skyrim and other old as frick 3rd party titles. The ps4 release is the confusing one, since it was once available on PS Now. I could understand if it was a remake for the PS5, but why waste development on bringing that game to the PS4 now?
>why waste development on bringing that game to the PS4 now?
long tail sales from poorgays stuck on generation old hardware
this is equivalent to those sudden, unwanted 360 and PS3 ports of GTA:SA they did
I'm happy not replaying the game ever again rather than spending money/hooking up the literal garbage that is the 360. If it comes to PC great, but I'm not bothering with old hardware.
RGH 360 exists dummy.
you're fixating on the "don't want to buy the game" part and not the "don't want to use ancient, fickle hardware" part
I mean yeah I wish the 360 had an internal power supply but it's way faster than the PS3.
>$50
holy fricking israelite
30fps still. Shits. Bet the resolution won’t even be that good on PS5 backwards compatability
Switch is the PC release.
>switch
kek can't wait to play this on deck
Lmao, no Xtroony port?
It’s already on there
MicroCucks beta tested.
>MicroCucks beta tested.
>PS4 version has no multiplayer or 4K but the xbox BC version does
30 fps, is the same thing
>PS4 and Switch
That's an odd as hell selection of platforms given that it pretty much skipped over the Xbox and PC
Just emulate it
It's not that great of a game anyway
2 is a better game, but both are pretty mediocre. I'm wanting to see how it runs on the Switch, and if they plan on downgrading the visuals, or making an attempt to keep it at 30 on that ancient tablet of a system.
pretty sure the switch is slightly more powerful than the 360 so I dont see why they would need to downscale it.
how easy the porting is depends on how ambitious your game is.
saints row games had a hard time on switch and ran worse than on 360.
conversely something like portal 2 is much simpler and blew the 360 version away
Won't happen because they signed a lifetime contract with consoles to not port it to PC.
It's hilarious taht people deny this. Everyone suspected it for years. No real explanation was given why they didn't just grab the millions waiting for them. "Muh they don't wanna do half-assed ports", "muh the code was spaghetti, the game is impossible to port." Always wrong answers. The real answer was obvious bribery, which was rampant in the 360/PS3 era.
> bribery
They’re called Contracts, anon.
thats not true
Wrong answer.
so they made a contract with nintendo 13 years ago ?
No, the contract meant wienerblocking PC only. Sony actually tried to own GTA at one point, and get it exclusive for a few months over Xbox, but since those didn't work, they figured the next best thing is to ban this one neutral competitor which doesn't have any big corporation shilling behind it.
Microsoft also similarly paid for Skyrim DLC and exclusive Skyrim marketing. PC ended up being the biggest platform by faaar, yet somehow magically Xbox was constantly in the limelight for that game. What do you think?
console exclusivity means its exclusive on one console, theres no such thing that you can release on any console but not on pc
You can put anything in a contract as long as both parties agree to the terms.
The word exclusive means nothing. They say game is exclusive on Xbox, yet it's on PC. PC doesn't count because it's a neutral platform. It's easy to ban it under the table since it's not even anticompetitive - PC isn't a corporation primarily invested in gaming.
Rockstar wised up though, and realized that whatever greedy Sony/Microsoft could offer would not be more than RDR2 on PC, and they were right.
Since RDR2 sold so well, and they are now porting RDR1 everywhere, there's literally ZERO, NADA reason to not port it to PC, unless there was some clause still in effect.
>Since RDR2 sold so well, and they are now porting RDR1 everywhere, there's literally ZERO, NADA reason to not port it to PC, unless there was some clause still in effect.
PC and current gen PS and Xbox will get the high-spec "remaster" with more detailed graphics (pajeet upscaled graphics).
PS4 and Switch get the original because they'll be too weak to run the "remaster" (not inherently, but it saves Rockstar of David some effort to not have to optimize for them).
PC doesn't get both versions because they want you to buy the newer, "better" version, and they want to mitigate people pirating the original when the remaster comes out and sucks balls.
>lifetime contract
who's lifetime? Intellectual Property doesn't have a lifetime.
It was signed during development. Rockstar knew they made a mistake so that deal was never made for RDR2. There's no reason to think RDR1 wouldn't have sold well on PC. The fact that they now keep porting it everywhere further cements the idea that they deliberately prevented themselves from porting it to PC, which is bigger than all those platforms they are now porting it to.
Like I said earlier, wrong answers. The logic never made any sense. Just a bunch of excuses when the obvious answer was in front of us all along.
no reference to such a contract exists anywhere online. You're full of shit. Either post source or frick off.
There is no reference to it on any media of course, but people speculated on forums, and especially on Ganker. It just makes sense. You have just keep raising your hands and saying no no no the whole time, do you have better arguments?
But... if you do some Googling, you'll see that mainstream vidya media did quote Rockstar saying the game's code is "spaghetti" and impossible port, which (take the hint) is a response to the criticism why it isn't coming to PC despite everyone calling for it. Read between the lines. That was Rockstar's poor excuse for why it hasn't happened.
Little did they know people still keep a watch. I see this article, and I look back when they said "spaghetti code". Well, what came to the spaghetti code? PC release when?
>source Ganker
you fricking Black person
Yep, a better source than ESG-paid shills.
So no Xbox release because you can just play the 360 version via back compat right?
The Xbox bc version is already 4k 60fps
What else could they change?
are there any enhancements?
PC is more cancerous and Reddit than anything these days.
sent from your iphone?
My LG C2 web browser actually
>There's no online
WHO THE FRICK WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS? ON A SWITCH AND A PREVIOUS GEN SONY CONSOLE??? WITH NO ONLINE???
Who cares, the online was just the obligatory, generic "Team Deathmatch" and "Catch the Flag" that every SP game was forced to implement in the late 2000s and early 2010s due to Call of Duty's popularity.
>no PC release
kek at this point I'd even expect a Mac port before a PC one
Kinda interested in playing this on my Switch Lite.
I might consider getting it for Switch, but is the game pozzed like RDR2 is? Because RDR2 is simply unplayable.
>being this much of a zoomer
Stick to Fortnite.
It was made before they started doing that shit.
>Because RDR2 is simply unplayable.
*tips hat* m'lord. care for any more homosexual juice today?
It's not that great, anon
Good morning sirs!, I love you for telling me that Red Dead isn’t available on your PC because there’s no PC and AI coding for video games, and if you think otherwise, you’re an idiot. GTA IV comes with white women rewriting all the bad words that appear in video games played by white women, so enjoy! GTA 6 is coming soon guys!
>pc gamers expecting rockstar to not treat them like second class citizens
dude it's been like 20 years of rockstar doing this
can i theoretically just put my RDR1 360 disc into my SeX and play it that way?
hilarious how snoys claimed for years to not care about playing old games, but now that they are being given a $50 port of a 13 year old game for essentially full price they are slurping it up. why are snoys such bootlickers bros I don't get it. thank god for Xbox at least being semi consumer friendly.
yeah, it will just download the game and run it that way. can't install from the disc itself, the disc is just used as the drm
RD-ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ *cough* ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
If its on switch you can emulate it the quality will suck but its something