Which are the best pokeclones? Starting with one of the best
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Which are the best pokeclones? Starting with one of the best
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
https://glitchwave.com/charts/top/game/all-time/g:monster%2dcollector/
DWM isn't a pokemon clone it's the other way arround. I still think the orginal DWM is one of the best monster tamers. The only other one I really play is FFX 13-2. Your third party slot is a monster and there are like 60 total. Not really a mon game but that's all I got.
DWM1 was released 2 years after Pokemon Red/Green. It's a Pokemon clone like many others that came out around the same time. I'm sick of you contrarians pushing this narrative that Pokemon did nothing original and just stole from DQ and SMT. Rid yourself from this planet at once.
wait, people actually tey to say pokemon stole from dw and...smt of all things? lol, the creator of pokemon very clearly stated that his primary influence on the rpg side of things was makai toushi saga, and it very clearly shows, but then again it's very clearly guaranteed that whoever is saying such things both never played saga 1 nor pokemon when it came out and are the same crop of people who 'love' earthbound despite never playing it and only played super smash bros. melee as tiny children, since earthbound came and went (to very little fanfare) before they were born
>wait, people actually tey to say pokemon stole from dw and...smt of all things?
Those are the go-to franchises people bring up whenever Pokegays say another thing is a clone of Pokemon (YW, Digimon, etc), usually just to point out that Pokemon didn't do monster recruitment first, not necessarily that it directly stole from those franchises.
wizardry 4 probably did monster recruitment first, at the very least it did it years before megami tensei 1 did, but of course pseuds don't know that
The thing is Dragon Quest and SMT have completely different gamelay and aesthetics than Pokémon, meanwhile YW and Digimon are just there to be Pokeclones for easy money
Got a source on this? The only one I can find is:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221015152551/https://www.nintendo.co.jp/nom/0007/taidan1/page02.html
And it seems to suggest the game merely informed him that it was possible to make an rpg on the gameboy. Not saying you're wrong, just curious and would like to see your sources. Also, I own SaGa1, its bad. (all saga games are absolute slop)
Oh and here's my copy of saga.
>was makai toushi saga, and it very clearly shows
Nta but In what exactly? I was looking at screenshots and I don't see it in the mon designs.
Dragon Warrior monsters and Devil Children were clearly a reply to Pokemon from Enix and Atlus
>DWM1 was released 2 years after Pokemon Red/Green.
but dqV came out four years before r/g and had monster taming as a side Hussle. Cut the crap.
all of the humans had toriyama eyes, cut the crap.
>graphical design is mechanics design
you're such a disingenuous piece of shit
dragon quest monsters joker
digital devil saga devil survivor
>t. only played pokemon red when it came out and nothing else after that
arc the lad 2
>released the same year as r/g
>had move tutor 7 years before pokemon
>better battle system
>can use ingame party members in battles aside from monsters
?t=78
take a gander.
DQM is not a pokeclone. DQM is based on mechanics from DQ5, which predates pokemon by several years.
Pokemon's concept was made years before DQshart5 existed, dumb fricking zoomoids.
don't you mean megaten-clones?
the bad one from my childhood
>Literally only 1 monster with 9 forms
What the frick were they thinking?
I never got the hype for DQM. I've played many JRPGs, and quite a few with "Monster Catching" mechanics, and none of the DQM games are more than 6/10s.
it's the eugenics