RE2 and RE4 fans now can unite and talk shit about both Demake 2 and 4.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
RE2 and RE4 fans now can unite and talk shit about both Demake 2 and 4.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Except both Remake 2 was a huge improvement on the original in many ways, and Remake 4 is looking to do so for RE4 (the good game that killed RE).
Cope you homosexual schizo. Remake 3 was only a "demake" because half the game was cut.
RE4R's combat (the most important part) looks like it's going to be a direct upgrade to the original, but character designs are abysmal and they chose the objectively worst VA for Ads (the b***h that played her in Welcome to Raccoon City).
Leon and Ada look great though. Luis looks worse (because this new interpretation is partially a villain - it was in the leaks) and Ashley as well. I do miss Remake 2 Ada's voice though.
I get those concerns but everything else looks great. We'll just have to see.
>because this new interpretation is partially a villain - it was in the leaks)
dumb if true
what other shit was leaked?
The combat looks like dozens other third person shooters on the market. I wouldn't call it a direct upgrade, it's substantially different and more generic for the genre.
Movement is tight. The dodge system allows you to fight with insane aggression. Quick shots reward reaction timing and crowd management. Healing is minimally interruptive. Melee and parrying get you out of rough spots while constantly keeping you in the fight.
There's a reason the Mercenaries community is still around for RE6. It has a massive skill ceiling.
new Ada sounds like dogshit, wish they kept the RE2 actor
Keeping any actor world be nice, idk what's up with Capcom and wildly changing the VAs and appearance of characters in every game.
Original Leon, Paul Haddad developed throat-cancer and was unable to voice the character anymore. He did enjoy RE2make before passing though.
Original Claire, Alyson Court drank the Voice Actor Guild kool-aid alongside Matthew Mercer (RE4 Leon) and became insufferable and overdemanding. So Capcom replaced them, (they been trying to for years but Voice Actor Unions makes it impossible to do so) citing their need for mocap due to RE engine as the reason why they didn't hire them.
Never heard this, especially the Matthew part, what happened?
Paul Mercier did Leon in RE4, and he is leaps and bounds better than Matthew Mercer. I don't even know why Matt became everyone's go to.
Everyone likes Matthew Mercer like out of the booth or something. I know he has a fanbase he was on some DND show. As a voice actor I'm not a huge fan because a lot of the time he just sounds like Troy Baker.
I want a Troy Baker voiced Leon so bad bros
Because Matt Mercer is discount Troy Baker, and up until not too long ago Troy Baker voiced every single main character.
Troy is fricking awful
>the good game that killed RE
But that was RE2, moron.
Nah, RE2 is great. Play it on Nightmare Arrange if you think it's too casual compared to RE1.
Nah, you're full of shit. I play the original multiple times a year, and there is plenty to love about both versions. Remake 2 is harder, has bosses that are not piss easy, has fun combat, is actually stressful, has areas that aren't just straight lines after the RPD and it's much more survival focused.
Classic RE2 is extremely fun, but it's piss easy and linear. The combat in the original were a fricking joke as well, outside of the quadrapedal Birkin and B Scenario Mr. x (but only on nightmare arrange lmao).
"demake 2" gays are fricking pathetic. They've never had any arguments other than the gutted A/B scenario - which doesn't matter much as the longer story in Remake 2 makes up for that.
Shut the frick up over the shoulder camera moron.
Nope. I actually prefer fixed cameras as well, but Remake 2 was still fantastic. No one cares about your babby shit autismal shit. The best way to do it though, would have been fixed camera for exploration, OTS for aiming.
Also - you will NEVER, EVER get a new fixed camera game bya big budget studio. You crying about it like it's something we missed out on, or had a chance of getting is delusional.
If you wanted a fixed camera RE2 remake, then homosexual - you and the other shitposters should have bought REmake and Zero at release. You should have gotten your friends to buy it. But you didn't, and this is the future you got. Cope and seethe.
>Also - you will NEVER, EVER get a new fixed camera game bya big budget studio.
Yes, and? Unlike you I'll just replay the classics, I don't give a flying frick about nu-Crapcom. You go and kiss their asses saying "it's better than nothing" because you're a moron with 0 pride.
>shits on re2 for being linear
>shills demake
lol
>plays the original multiple times
>wtf why don't i feel stressed in this horror game ive replayed like an autist 50 times
lol
>fun combat
subjective
>survival focus
lol
>longer story
LOL
Well yeah, Remake 2 is less linear after the RPD considering the OG game is virtually a straight line after that part
>lol, lol, subjective, lol, LOL
What a fricking moron. You snivelling homosexuals have never, ever had a good argument other than being unlikable autists who are bad at games that require more skill.
Story continuity errors
shit character rewrites
and yes, the half baked scenario system
explain how Annette dies in Claire's arms only to get back up and find Leon only to get bodied and dying by William again in RE2make.
You can't because the writing was shit
>Play it on Nightmare Arrange if you think it's too casual compared to RE1.
Lol. RE2 was made with being a casual action game from the beginning. Giving enemy a damage boost doesn't change how linear and dumbed down it is to the original.
it was only a "huge improvement" if you fundamentally didn't like the original, in which case your opinion doesn't mean much.
gameplay was a lateral move to a new style and everything else got downgraded.
>Except both Remake 2 was a huge improvement
lol
stopped reading
work on your bait, too obvious
>Except both Remake 2 was a huge improvement on the original in many ways
No. It was a MASSIVE downgrade and all around raped clusterfrick, in every conceivable manner.
Compared to the 1998 original, it's just a pathetic cash-grab. Compared to the 2002 REmake, it's beyond lazy rush job, made to appeal to gays who never gave two shits about RESI.
Nah, it was a huge upgrade. The combat is astronomically better, every location outside of the RPD is far better designed, it's actually somewhat difficult compared to the piss easy original, the graphics are great, etc.
. Everything else in your post is you b***hing without any actual arguments. This has always been the case with you gays. You b***h about the fact it was remade, but you never have any leg to stand on.
Your comment about the writing however, IS valid. The OG story of how the RPD fell is great and ties into Outbreak. That definitely was an issue.. but it doesn't ruin the game at all.
Wow, you're so brave and special. Meanwhile I'm enjoying the originals and the more difficult and involved Remakes. The Remakes are better than 99% of new games.
the post that broke boomoids
i'm a boomoid and realized the remake was better the moment i played it on launch
Said no actual "boomoid" ever. Actual people who played the original when it was new don't use terms like "boomer" or "oid," we use terms like "Oldgay," "newbie," "homosexual," or "Black person."
ok zoomoid
>game looks shinier therefore good
Ok zoomer
Well yeah, it's a gorgeous game. That obviously is a benefit. The rest of the game around those graphics is also much better for the most part. It's an great game in it's own right that compliments RE2 perfectly.
The issue is the removed A/B - which is offset by the much longer campaign, and the inconsistencies in the writing. Removing Ada's connection to John was really weird and unnecessary. Additionally, the fall of the RPD was written very well in the OG canon, and this was a chance to tie the game closer to outbreak.
Fpbp
Utterly based
I kneel
Cope
Seethe
Dilate
You cant kill a dead franchise. Nobody played resident evil 3 much less code veronica.
a series with near annual game releases is not considered a dead franchise anon
REmake 2 is only an improvement if you only played Leon A for both.
The scenario system had more to it than the story. Half-baked though it may have been, there were many gameplay choices that carried over to the B scenario.
>it's actually somewhat difficult
You literally can't die unless you get hit while already in Danger. Paired with how easy it is to manipulate the AI, it isn't harder even on Hardcore. The only potential threat in the game is door campers.
>REmake 2 is only an improvement if you only played Leon A for both.
>better combat and deeper mechanics to it isn't better
>better camera control isn't better
>better graphics aren't better
>better implimented and more threatening enemies aren't better
>bigger yet tighter designed areas aren't better
>better dialogue and characterization isn't better
>more intesive and varied boss fights arne't better
>more free extra content isn't better
There is so little that isn't better you'd have to be an obstanant piece of shit to call the remake a downgrade in any regard. Oh it doesn't have crows, or spiders? Frick off.
You start in a different area and have access to much more of the RPD at the start making it quicker. You also get a different starter weapon that does more damage and references a thin in the OG game if you play Leon B. There remixed puzzle solutions and extra steps added to some others, but nothing too crazy. The other events and extra parts you didn't see plus one last extra Boss on top of the different one for the other scenario. It's maybe the one thing the REmake doesn't have over the original, a true B scanario, it's more of an arrange mode, but there's enough content that you'd probably want to play through it at least.
You also get Hunk's thing once you beat it, just like the og.
>better combat and deeper mechanics
>better camera control
>it's bait to saw the objective facts
I really wish people like you who post shit like this would get their head torn off by a tractor.
What to you get out of being a worthless annoying piece of shit online anyway, some cheap chemical shot because you "trolled" somebody online, or are you actually so stupid you believe your own mental moronation.
>My subjective opinion is an objective fact
No, frick you and your weak ass bait.
He's absolutely right and your pissing about it and whining is pathetic.
Nice same gay.
A subjective opinion can't be a fact, now eat shit you moron. I don't even give a shit you like RE2make more, "better combat" is your opinion and you can go shove your bait up your ass.
>muh subjective!
it's not you worthless Black person.
The camera is objectively better than the original and DOES have more control, you cannot control the camera at all in the original, and you can see more with it.
You are so far up your own pseudo-intellect ass that you cease to see facts for what they are.
As for the gameplay and enemies they are also OBJECTIVELY better than the original. Aiming has more mechanics that are both simple and subtle, and enemies to bosses have more complex patterns over just standing there or lazily chasing you around.
You are so fricking stuipid you can't even understand the difference between objective and subjective, or you're autistic, or you're some loser shitposting neet, in any case saw your own hands off so we don't have to interact with you again.
How come demakelets always redditspace?
Relax autist, I suggest looking up what words mean before you use them.
>autistic neet doesn't even know the words he uses
concession accepted, apologize for wasting people's time next time.
every time
Remake 2 is a action horror game
RE2 is a survival horror game
They're two different games in two different genre's and it is baffling that Ganker has to live by this childish mentality that one has to be better than the other.
>t. never played the remake
How’s the remake any more action than the original?
morons
The only "action" in the remake is stabbing and shoving nades in mouths to prevent grabs. There isn't a dodge in either game, nor kicks, punches, suplexes, etc...
>Remake 2 is a action horror game
>RE2 is a survival horror game
you haven't played either.
God I can't wait for March 24
>because half the game was cut
why does this meme have such legs? 3 was a demake because all of the content was rushed trash. it's not like what we got was solid and it was just missing some OG areas. What we got was absolute tripe on its own. It was outsourced to some Thai or Laotian or some shit tertiary team and thrown out the door to pad their earnings.
My biggest complaint remains that 2nd form Nemesis was trash. Turning him into an animal was moronic when the original design was more like him losing control while retaining the intelligence, but the remake version was him turning into an actual animal you only fight in two arena battles. The bulky version was a perfect fit to chase you around the hospital and I could entirely forgive the cut areas if they just utilized him in the hospital and NEST.
>give him a bulky design reminiscent of the original
>have him continue being a pursuer in the rest of the game
>make him fast, forcing you to down him to progress
>force the player to nail down the dodge mechanic due to faster attacks and overall speed; maybe with larger dodge windows
>downing him puts him down for several minutes and drops more rewards
>give out more ammo in late game to compensate
There you go. I didn't fix R3make, but I made it much better than the final product since the second half is BY FAR the weakest part.
>it's not like what we got was solid and it was just missing some OG areas
that's literally what it was though
you literally have dogshit taste and should kys. nothing about re3 is quality except maybe the first little area that comprised the demo and even that was marred by the jankiness that exists throughout the game.
RE4 is already a demake, given that the Fog build was meant to be the real RE4, which was only thrown out due to technical restrictions on the fog BOW. We would have had the proper followup to CV and would have seen Umbrella's collapse.
If Remake 4 makes the game truer to REAL RE, then good.
Fog build looked like shit compared to release and I'm glad we got the version we did.
Nah you gay. You've barely seen that build as well, as it became Haunting Ground. Leon vs Wesker would have been hype. It would have been a true horror game. Graphics were better. Leon would have had a mutated arm like Krauser as well. Plus RE5 would have been completely redundant as all the good parts of that games story would have been in Fog 4. Nope.
You underage morons can't troll.
>RE4 is already a demake,
RE1 was a demake because it wasn't first person
Considering the last good RE was 6, I have no doubt REmake 4 will be shit.
You RE6 contrarians need to have your skulls crushed under a boot. What a dogshit, trendchasing, soulless and boring turd of a game.
RE6 had the best combat system by far, but it was stuck in a game that fricked up every other point besides a few. Leon's campaign was great, Chris' was trash, and Sherry's had the potential to be awesome but fell flat overall. Each had points where they succeeded exceptionally and failed miserably.
>Chris gets great character development and shows the real ass kicking part of the BSAA that we miss in other games until RE8 but the actual gameplay was lame with a Gears of War style shooter
>Leon fighting through the city outbreak was phenomenal and the boss fights were great, but Helena was an absolutely nothing character who wasn't even cute which would justify her absolutely nothing personality
>Jake was awesome but missed potential and the campaign was a weak mix between Chris and Leon's with too little happening, while Ustanak was neat but not as strong of a threat like Nemesis who they were trying to emulate
Final fist fight between Jake and Ustanak is probably one of my favorite game moments. I hate that I can't even complete the campaign without wanting to fall asleep.
If by greatest you mean 'most extensive' then yes. However, as much as RE6's WWE levels of combat are hilarious, that doesn't make them very good. When people talk about the 'good' combat in RE6, they're talking about the melee combat because the gunplay is unironically a downgrade over RE4. Even that melee combat is only considered good because there's more of it than in other RE games, but at the end of the day its part of the reason why RE6 isn't a survival horror game. When people say Leon's campaign was great, they mean when compared to the other two (or three), because it doesn't hold a candle to RE4 or even RE5. RE6 is a janky pile of steaming dogshit, but its one that can be fun with a buddy just for how ridiculous it is.
t.Homosexual. You're correct that there is s downgrade in guns compared to RE5 and RE4, but to act like that somehow invalidates the amazing range of combat actions present in RE6 is completely disingenuous, and your dismissal of RE6 as a game is frankly rather disgusting. It's easily one of the most polished third person shooters ever made, and to reduce it to "a janky pile of steaming dogshit" should revoke your right to have any serious video game discussions. There is something to be said about the depth of guns in its predecessors vs the depth of movement in it, and the tradeoff that entails. Also, your mind is clearly far too irony poisoned to hold any kind of substantive opinion on story of any game, let alone RE.
Take your meds and play better games.
>Amazing range of combat actions
Discount character action game
>Easily one of the most polished third person shooters ever made
Is that why its janky-er than most other TPS in its own series, let alone scores of other TPS?
Anon, you are unironically moronic. I went easy on RE6. There's not a single person with even a half-decent understanding of games that thinks RE6 should be considered a good game. A small number of interesting mechanics don't make up for all the other garbage RE6 shovels down your throat. To claim that RE6 is good is either you being a major contrarian or a sign of severe debilitating autism. Take your meds and get help.
>more of it than in other RE games
It has less going on than RE5, considering how locational damage and co-op factored in.
>why RE6 isn't a survival horror game
None of them were as of 4.
>When people say Leon's campaign was great
They're regurgitating shit they heard online. It's just raid defense after raid defense with the same 1, occasionally 2 enemies copy-pasted broken up with absurdly scripted action setpieces. It's unbelievably repetitive and the whole game is equally awful.
You're making some solid arguments about the locational damage, however I would argue that while RE from 4 onwards definitely wasn't focused on the horror aspect, there's still some survival horror elements present in 4, where as RE6 is just a straight-up action shooter with BOWs. For most of RE6 you don't even really need to conserve ammo because you can easily fall back on the melee system, which is a lot harder to do in RE4.
RE6 gutting inventory management and tank controls certainly removed the series' last vestiges, but RE4 introduced enemies dropping herbs and ammo. The drop rates are adjusted dynamically based on your current inventory and status, so it's basically impossible to run out so long as you maintain at least 50% accuracy. That difference is due to melee in RE6 being overpowered rather than complex.
That's true, but it was still way easier to get overwhelmed by the sheer number of enemies in RE4 then it was in RE6. RE4 still had some amount of threat as you often had to retreat and reposition to not get fricked by groups (unless you're good with the stun system). That threat is completely absent from RE6, except for maybe a few moments in Leon's campaign. That threat of being overwhelmed is part of why I still consider RE4 to have some level of survival horror, while RE6 is just straight action.
Old good, new bad.
>"19 FRICKING 98... I'll never fricking forget it. It was the year when these pants-pissingly gruesome murders occurred in the motherfricking Arklay Mountains. Soon after, the news was out to the whole goddamned world revealing that it was the fault of a secret viral experiment conducted by the egg-head shit-for-brains wienersuckers working for Umbrella. The virus broke out in a nearby mountain community, Raccoon motherfricking City. Shit hit the fan and the peaceful little town went breasts up. Not taking any chances, the President of the goddamned United States, Bill Clinton, probably in the middle of getting sucked off by Lewinsky, ordered a contingency plan - to blow the everloving high holy frick out of Raccoon City. With the whole fricking affair gone public, the United States government issued an indefinite suspension of business decree to Umbrella. Soon its stock prices crashed and as sure as shit, Umbrella was fricking finished. Six fricking years had passed since that horrendous fricking incident..."
This overdone joke was only mildly funny the first time I saw it years ago and time has done it no favors.
FRICKING FREEZE
I FRICKING SAID FRICKING FREEZE
All RE jokes are forced and unfunny, do you not remember "Leon frick my sister"?
The last good remake for Resident Evil was REmake for the Gamecube. Capcom will never achieve such magic again. It was literally the same exact team that made the first game doing the remake. It had so much soul and respect for the game, unlike these new REmakes which is just
1.take old game
2. modernize it for normies
>It was literally the same exact team that made the first game doing the remake.
No it wasn't and I have no idea how this bullshit ever got started. The only returning people were Mikami, some random coder from RE1 promoted to producer, and a handful of miscellaneous sound design and other similar staff. Everyone else was brand new.
None of the other key people from RE1 like Fujiwara, Kamiya, Iwao, or Takeuchi were involved with it.
tbf all that matters is the original director
>goalposts: moved
Fixed camera gays need be rounded up and slaughtered. The game hasn't had fixed camera in 20 fricking years. Please die off already.
actually listening to what any homosexual has to say on this website
you all suck
Why is it everytime a game gets remade, remake homosexuals come into every game discussion website/forum and start acting like some victim? Like frick off, you like the new casualslop remake of X or y Game? cool it was designed for you.
stop shitting on the older game that filtered you
BILL ME FOR THE FRICKIN' REPAIRS LATER
I can't wait to be punished for playing well in the RE4make, just like RE2make.
Oh I'm also excited for the Marvel tier witty quips and one liners the whole game, as well as the new REmake trend of cursing every 3 words. Can't wait for Leon to say piss, shit, and frick the entire game. Is it confirmed Ashley will be in jeans and a tanktop yet?
You're not fooling anyone here RE4gay, now you desperately need the "old re fans" help to screech louder. its your turn to adapt to new things.
Do you guys think an actual REmake 2 in the style of REmake would have failed? I feel like VII and VIII brought back interest in the series to normalgays and they probably would have at least tolerated true remakes.
>Do you guys think an actual REmake 2 in the style of REmake would have failed?
I think it would have been extremely well received and successful. Especially if it was like REmake where it celebrated the original game and added in cut content or new content that only made sense that either adds to the pre-existing story or does nothing to impact the pre-existing lore and canon significantly.
Resident Evil has a big following, ostracizing the true fans in hopes of appealing to a normie audience shouldn't be the approach anymore. RE2make sold well, but it's less a celebration of the original game and more of a game designed to make money first and foremost where as the original was about continuing a story and world first, and a game second.
>ostracizing the true fans in hopes of appealing to a normie audience shouldn't be the approach anymore.
That ship sailed in 1998 when they dumbed down the original RE2 to appeal to casuals.
>RE2make sold well, but it's less a celebration of the original game and more of a game designed to make money first and foremost
you are completely full of shit, the guys who remade 2 did so for years and were fans of the og, which is why the RPDwas so lovingly crafted of all exisitng versions using parts from the cut 1.5, og and outbreak, they spent a eyar or more adding ivies back in because the director didn't want a game without them. They experimented with satic camera angles, old menus, etc, it's complete dishonest bullshit to say RE2 was just made to appeal to normies and make money, shit was a love letter in the DNA, the amount of easter eggs and references to the original was ridiculous, and you could only think this if you did you best to not pay attention at all.
>the guys who remade 2 did so for years and were fans of the og
See
They weren't though, as posted here:
Referencing the world of Resident Evil is the bare minimum and shouldn't be considered as fanfare. RE2make was designed to make money, and it did, and it was successful. The game did what Capcom wanted it to do.
The two guys who directed RE2R have been working on the series since RE1. One of them did the absolute kino forest hospital chapter and one or two other Outbreak scenarios.
The guy who directed RE2 was a guy who's job in RE2 was to model spiders and that was it.
Stop with the historical revisionism.
I agree with that other anon, it would probably become an instant cult classic. But it wouldn't reach the gang buster numbers Capcom expects from the RE franchise or sold nearly as well as the actual 2R we got. Which might have resulted in them shelving the idea of remaking other games.
Plus there'd be hundreds of articles, twitter threads and vidya essays saying how the classic style is outdated, racist and ableist.
Ganker still can't handle how successful RE2R was I see.
>fans of a series reasonably upset that they have been forsaken for the largest common denominator cause money!!!
No shit. You see it with Elden Ring, you see it with RE2make, you saw it with Diablo 3. You saw it with WC3Reforged.
Stop being surprised by this shit.
>If I stick two games that came out and were universally praised by everyone but jaded homosexuals from Ganker and two games that were universally panned by literally everyone including the jaded homosexuals from Ganker I prove my point!
lol
lmao even
People liked WC3Reforge and D3, what is your point my guy?
I don't want that troony who slept with bald troony fricker to play this gem, guys..
So then don't play it.g
oh no.. it's moronic and can't read
I don't want trannies playing it so I'm politely asking you not to play it.
once again: you're moronic homosexual troony here
I hate the le realism shotgun in the demake and all re engine re games to be honest. Sound like trash too with no impact whatsoever.
>Souls vs soulless
If you're complaining about the recoil animation, you're insane. The original doesn't make sense from a logical perspective and looks wonky the more you look at it. Why is the stock riding down his bicep with the recoil?
>Why is the stock riding down his bicep with the recoil?
because it looks cooler, that or the devs didn't know or care about how realistic firing a shotgun looked, they just wanted to make the game fun. I think RE4R looks great but I think over-the-top realism is painfully boring, especially in game with as much goofy shit as RE4 which can't be too deep rooted in realism.
Also noticed how the demake doesn't have the fun midair death spin animation.
the fact they put ada in a turtle neck and trousers tells me everything i need to know about this game
why not hate on re3?
i'm playing the re3 remake right now and its terrible, its like the second half of the re2 remake but also with lara croft falling off shit cutscenes every 2 minutes
is the original game better? i don't care about cut content so much, i just hate how actiony this game is compared to 2
3make was made on a budget half of what 2make had
I dont give 2 shits what happen behind the scenes, they charged the same for both.
Everyone knows that is trash including jill so why bother talking about it
>It's like the second half of the RE2 Remake
But the second half of the RE2 remake was great. The sewers and labs completely and utterly mog the original.
Yes, the original 3: Nemesis is better just like how the original 2 is better than the DEmake.
I still feel like RE3make was a prank and we'll eventually get the true version
Time for you to take that walk Teddy.
Nope it was the real thing that was subcontracted to another studio due to unfounded faith they could produce the same quality present in remake 2 while capcom's division 1 studio made new mainline games. Thanks to REmake 3 failing we get a proper Remake 4 in much higher quality
If this contrarian meme is just to make Ganker look moronic, then congratulations good job. The REmakes are overwhelming liked by every other community, players and devs alike. I guess dying on this hill will be really funny when it's later summerized in a future Whang video...? You'll be just like your hero, the Silent Hill Foreskin guy. Haha...
That was deep... very deep anon, any more fairy tales to share with us
What the frick are you fricking buyin, stranger
I might be mistaken, but from the footage I've watched I noticed the following:
>enemies are bullet sponges like in remakes of 2-3
I didn't mind this back then because they're zombies and you could tear their limbs apart to incapacitate them (in 2).
Here though, they're normal people with a parasite in their brain, yet they won't stagger unless you blow a shotgun up their ass.
>melee doesn't work for crowd control or damaging multiple enemies
Maybe the footage was misleading, but I noticed Leon can only melee one foe at a time and throwing an enemy won't hurt or make the surrounding enemies fall
Again, I may be wrong, but these are serious redflags for me.
The bullet sponge zombies is the best thing to happen to them in the genre. They're not just enemies to kill and forget about, they're walls that make passing through tight corridors hard to do. It's also much more faithful to how zombies operate in 1-3, and specifically - nightmare arrange in 2.
Even then, the people who b***h about them are fricking stupid. That zombie can be knocked down, have its limbs destroyed, rendered inactive, etc. so you can get past it. I have no idea why these morons insist on pumping more and more ammo into them until their heads explode.
tired of 4's shit, been since that stupid spider final boss after I beat the game day one. I can only hope that the 4make can correct the mistakes 4 already made
You make zero fricking Sense
zero was also shit and we need a zeromake
So why does 2 remake make Ganker seethe so much? I've been playing it recently and enjoying it quite a bit.
THEY REMOVED THE STUPID PUZZLES NO ONE LIKES CAN'T YOU SEE IT'S WHITE GENOCIDE?
Did the original RE2 even have any puzzles? All I remember is the library shelves, and they give you the solution for that in a way that's impossible to miss.
There are a few schizo shitposters that think that Remakes damage their identity. It's really crazy, as Remake 2 was the best designed survival horror game in a decade. They're so caught up on small aspects despite it being a separate game. This is where the contrarian bugmen crawl out of the woodwork to claim that trash like 6 was somehow better.
Many were filtered by the combat, so they make claims that somehow OG2 was harder because of tank controls (it wasn't, as it was piss easy), or how Remake 2 is apparently shorter as well, which is also a lie.
They've really poisoned the well of RE discussion. They're full of vitriol and can't convey their thoughts in a coherent way.
Why are you so mad some people prefer the originals, why just saying that triggers you gays so much.
>best designed survival horror game in a decade.
RE2make is action horror, not survival horror.
It's absolutely survival horror (plus action). It doesn't need to be some autistic game like Pathologic 2 to be a survival game.
RE2 any% Claire takes 1 hour and 25 minutes
RE2make any% Claire takes 20 minutes
Where are you getting this information that RE2make is longer?
inb4 >speedrun
Playing the games.
Also yes using any% is a dumb metric. By that logic OOT is a shorter game than Claire's story.
>any%
Mentally Ill gay
Why would you expose yourself like this, anon? I'm embarrassed for you.
because they made claire ugly and leon's voice sucks
Remake 4, FF16 and Suicide Squad. Are the only good games. Especially Remake 4.
>'you want stars, I'll give you stars'
>immediately flees down a hole
I fricking hate the 3make
name 1 good resident evil bossfight
the scripted 15 second alligator fight from 2make
I like that RE4R is going for a more horror themed direction, but I've disliked almost everything I've seen in terms of how the player interacts with the game. It feels very homogenized with the Remakes and has lot a lot of the tactile feel of RE4. Introducing the plagas heads really early feels off. No laser aiming makes it feel less like you're in the world. Blocking the chainsaw with a knife is weirdly more something I'd have expected in the original RE4 than in the Remake, based on the tone of the rest of the game. Same with the unlockable costumes.
I'm probably gonna pick it up regardless but I'm very skeptical of it living up to the original, much less surpassing it and becoming something I replay every year like RE4.
Capcom unironically has no fricking clue what they're doing with resident evil. They add absurd amounts of swearing and cut "unrealistic" enemies because they want RE to be mature now yet still keep nonsensical mechanics and laughably bad writing. They talk about how the series is about muh horror and returning to roots now but the recent titles have been closer to RE6 and RE1.
RE2 being good (but still not amazing) was a fluke, RE4R is going to make the original look like a metroidvania. Also don't forget after it releases all the redditors will call it a masterpiece and bend the media into calling the original unplayable now.
i feel like capcom hasn't known what they're doing with RE for a long time, just throwing stuff at the wall and doubling down on what seems to work
The director of these demakes is one of the most hypocritical soulless homosexuals I've ever seen. You know it's bad when even a fricking PRODUCER can see how far off track your game is.
Go ahead and tell me right now why RE2 remake was bad without saying "muh spiders"
see:
Also some people hate the adaptive difficulty modifiers and some don't, I personally don't care while others shitters find it insulting to have a game reward bad play and punish good play. Once I realized zombies got stronger the better I was at dispatching them, I just stuck to the tried and true kneecap stagger and avoid.
Started playing 2 remake on the weekend and enjoying it quite a bit. Finished Leon's A and nearly finished Claire's. What is different about the B campaigns?
>What is different about the B campaigns?
Nothing.
Boomers really be like "yo this some DEEP gameplay not like the dumbed down remake"
can't wait to hear the opinion on RE4 remake from our guy
holy shit what a fricking downgrade.
I prefer the original and I won't stand for this bullying by zoomers!
I don't understand why they replaced Leon's old model with this one. Same with Chris.
Remake 2 is near universally loved. It's RE3 that dropped the ball.
REmake4 has yet to be seen. Could be anything.
why are ashley's breasts so small, did westerners work on this game or something?
Capcom wants to follow in Sony's footsteps and become a Californian company.
*mogs every single puzzle in OG RE2*
Not that that's a high bar to clear lmao
RE2 fan here who thinks RE2 is the best video game of all time. Not "best Resident Evil game" no best VIDEO GAME of all time ever: REmake 2 was incredibly based and now the second best game in the series. So you can frick off with your "RE2 fans hate the remake bullshit"
RE2 is in my personal top 5
RE2make unfortunately doesn't make the mark (it is a good game though)
HOLY KINO
Remake 2 was fricking awesome tho, just because your rig can't run it doesn't make it a bad game
>just because your rig can't run it doesn't make it a bad game
I disagree. Do you realize how absurdly powerful modern computers have become over the past several years? If your game can't run on my hardware, then as far as I'm concerned your game is an unoptimized piece of shit that you couldn't be bothered to polish. Modern games seriously have no excuse to be as stupidly huge wastes of space that they are, and only are because they can get away with it now.
are you seriously saying you can't run re2re? I have an old higher end rig from 2016ish and I get it running at high+ settings at 120 fps+
How is my bait thread still up?
Its a good thing the originals still exist so I can enjoy both them and the Remakes while you seethe like an autistic manchild.