>50 bucks
meanwhile a full on remaster of metroid prime was 40, has rockstar completely lost their marbles
 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
red dead on switch
>50 bucks
meanwhile a full on remaster of metroid prime was 40, has rockstar completely lost their marbles
|
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
The hype is over. Nobody's gonna respond to this thread anymore. But have a (You) from me.
The hype is beginning. Everybody’s gonna respond to this thread constantly. But have a (Me) from you.
i bought
Im still probably gonna buy it tho
Part of the attraction is the novelty aspect. Taking 360/ps3 era games on the go is still cool. I mean the last handheld for Nintendo was the 3ds, so think of that handheld graphical leap from that to switch.
It’s cool to see what possible. They are fricking putting Arkham knight on the switch. That game was ps4/Xbox one era. It’s interesting
dont get me wrong I love the idea, but the pricepoint is insane man, if it was 29.99 or even 39.99, but it costs more than nintedno developed games from 2023
it will be that in 3 months
On Xbox it's still $29.99 and regularly goes on sale for half that, plus it still has multiplayer (which has been hacked to death but still). Just wait, LA Noire goes on sale for $15 all the time.
Im willing to pay 50 if it's a 60fps port. How likely am I to get disappointed?
we gotta wait for the digital foundry video tomorrow, highly unlikely, maybe in docked mode
Doubt it’s going to be 60FPS
The better question is how much is how much is rockstar going to cheap out on cart size and force you to download.
Both LA Noir and GTA had insanely large mandatory downloads, I.E. 10+ GBs
Apparently it's only 11GB, so it shouldn't need any downloads.
Seems to be a straight 7th gen port made and optimised with Switch in mind, ala Dark Souls, with a PS4 port thrown in at some point. Likely gonna be 30fps, MAYBE 60 on the PS5 BC if Sony pays R* enough for them to not be as lazy as they've been for everything that isn't a game's Day 1 launch.
>60 fps on the shitch
Isn't it weaker than the xbox 360? Even that console struggled to run it. I think it maintained 20-25 fps average and it was even worse on the PS3.
I hope it can run 60fps on the deck.
Burnout Paradise port runs 60 flawlessly on the switch, but then again, it did run flawlessly on ps3. So you might be righ
I am right and you're a moron for comparing it to Burnout Paradise, a fricking racing game.
Dark Souls runs far more stable and in higher res on Switch than on 360, this is something that is true for most 7th gen Switch ports. You're probably thinking of games that were ported from PS4 and Xbone.
barely
You're not getting 60 fps on the switch.
you started your point by saying 360 is more powerful, to them being on the same level, to now switch being barely more powerful, gtfo kid
Yes, I was proven wrong so I corrected my standpoint. Where's the shame in that?
homosexual.
I don't think it'll be 60 fps either, but you just made a wrong statement.
There’s plenty of games that run at 60FPS on switch.
And you’re not getting it on PS4 or PS5 because the game is coded for 30FPS.
But it runs at 60 on emulators and xbone.
It's 30 on xbox, you could have easily looked that up.
It does not.
it does run 60 on xenia/rpcs3.
dark souls on switch had better framerate, higher resolution than the 360 version, source is digital foundry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZdfO8ECwdo
No, Eric, the Switch is more powerful than the 360.
Not Rockstar, Take Two
Release it for 50 bucks and 3 months later you can start selling it at 30% or 40% off so it gets on the "great deals" tab and best sellers of the eShop at the price point you want.
I remember some shovelware game actually increased the price of their game to over $200, but then constantly had it on sale for 99% off on the switch eshop.
Shovelware for sale at 1 cent used to be relatively common on the eShop because of the gold coins you get with every purchase, Nintendo would be forced to give you the game for free. That's why you can't sell anything for less than a dollar now.
>50 bucks
>meanwhile a full on remaster of metroid prime was 40
No re-released game should cost more than $20.
What are the odds that ryujinx RDR1 will perform better than RPCS3 RDR1?
Is the NSP out yet?
>has rockstar completely lost their marbles
Yes.
Has it leaked yet?
homosexuals will buy it anyways, and that's what sets the standard for this sort of sloppy low effort garbage
Tendies will eat any slop nintendo gives them
embargo on reviews and the performance is probably in place for them to go live only after the launch, if take two even sent out review copies
Im guessing 50ish fps docked, 25ish fps portable
>Im guessing 50ish fps docked
If the 360 couldn't maintain 30 fps there is no way in hell the switch can.
seems like they did some optimization for it, switch is a 360+ not as weak but slightly more powerful
B-but it has undead nightmare goy, that should cost another 30 bucks we're being generous here!
>Improvements of Red Dead Redemption (PS4 / PS5):
>Higher resolution (1080 p)
>Increased view distance
>Improved lighting effects
>Improved particle effects like dust
>Higher resolution shadows
>Update – Does Red Dead Redemption offer 60 FPS? No, according to comparisons from the Red Dead Reddit, the “remaster” of RDR does not offer 60 FPS and 4k resolution on PS4 or Switch. Instead, the new port is said to be comparable to the Xbox Series S version.
>On the Nintendo Switch, meanwhile, most of these improvements could be omitted. But we’ve already checked with developer DoubleEleven about the Switch tech, because as the community suspects on Twitter, the Red Dead Redemption remasters improvements aren’t based on intentional development decisions. According to them, it’s more due to the console’s pure hardware performance that Double Eleven’s developers were able to squeeze more pixels and FPS out of the outdated engine.
switch is a different game, built from the ground up for switch seems like, they could possibly push the framerate on both docked and handheld
That's because Switch sold by the power of marketing, brand recognition and a handful of first-party titles, and now a hundred million people are stuck port begging for a device with barely any third-party games. Of course they're going to price gouge when there's no competition, people will pay it as sunk cost to justify owning the Switch.
costs the same as the ps4 version fricko
And releases 5 years later. If it was a platform with proper competition like PC, it'd already be half-price.
>barely any third-party games
eshop shows 1998 games on sale, thats just on sale, and bud, nintendo first party games dont go on sale
They're going to shut down their MP servers soon right? Any incentive to push people on the remaster.
I was going to buy another old gen copy for the servers, it will be cheaper anyhow...
Meanwhile, a full remaster of Quake 2 with multiplayer and bonus content is only 10.
>the virgin Rockstar
>shits out a fifty dollar port with no multiplayer and no new content
>the chad Bethesda
>delivers a remaster with oodles of content and all kinds of quality of life upgrades for a measly ten dollars
>$50
People pay for Switch games???
Yeah some people aren’t poor and can afford their hobbies.
I'll be affording it for 0$.
Yeah because you’re brown.
I'm not amerimutt. Frick off israelite.
>Frick off israelite.
Said the guy who's to cheap to buy video games.
I'm not wasting 50 bucks on a 10+ year old port homie.
as long as normies buy it, they dont care
People will buy it, because people fricking love Rockstar's stale ass games for some reason.
shit I would buy it if it was priced fairly