Just release one game that randomizes wild encounter charts every time you start up a new save.
It would incentivize trading to catch them all, and do wonders for replayability.
Game Freak can also focus on creating a good game instead of games with the idea of needing two version that have slight, unnecessary, changes.
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
with GameFreak I'd expect something with the randomization to go wrong and get the equivelant of Missingno
they're not going to stop doing this because it's literally free money
blame miyamoto
When did Nintendo start valuing money over quality games?
the only reason nintendo cares about quality is because it improves sales
the seal of quality was a direct response to the video game crash, which occurred due to an excess of shovelware
You DO understand the deal was a guarantee Nintendo had licenced the branded item and not in fact they promised the game itself was going to be top-class, yeah?
Or are you another zoomie fricker, born after they removed it because "we know consumers know the seal doesn't actually guarantee if a game is good or bad"?
The blame is definitely on the shoulders of TPC executives who do it for free money and ‘brand tradition’. Nintendo is just the apathetic force that benefits from it, and GF are the creatively bankrupt slaves who mindlessly follow the mandate despite having done nothing interesting with it beyond Gens 3 and 5.
>The blame is definitely on the shoulders of TPC executives who do it for free money and ‘brand tradition’.
it was literally miyamoto's idea though
if he hadn't suggested it, it wouldn't have become a tradition
It made sense and was a good idea… on the gameboy.
Didnt read
Kys immediately frogBlack person, youre a waste of oxygen and a cancer on Ganker
Agreed
frogsite
The frog started on reddit you’ve been gaslit by Misc to think otherwise
LMAO it's hilarious how much you project. You are the one who has been gaslit by yourself.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pepe-the-frog
Pepe has been posted here longer than you've been here
I never understood the newbie anger towards sadfrog. Must be the same reason they hate anime. Cuteness aggression?
how does that apply when most modern pepe images are drawn to be as unpleasant and ugly as is possible (like that stupid laughing one with the distended visible gums), same with wojak
Im curious the % of people who buy both versions.
Trading is still fun tbh but with home its not as cool as it used to be
>Just release one game that randomizes wild encounter charts every time you start up a new save.
this is even worse
holy shit you people are moronic
What’s your problem with that suggestion? I thought it was good.
>real excited to play with a Pokemon
>Pokemon is 10 hours in the adventure
>randomizer says no
>no friends
>forced to reset or not use Pokemon
>reset
>still not there
>reset
>another Pokemon you care about isn't there
>can’t play a game without a perfectly mapped out team
>yet plays +10 hours of just that, then shits his pants in the last 3 hours
This is too autistic for me to even consider it a real scenario. Just use Home if you have such a disability.
>t. somebody who buys both versions and trades with himself
How about an optional randomizer you can turn on and off whenever you want? Pokemon infinite fusion has a randomizer with tons of options and when you use it it generates a text file that lets you know which mons you can find in each place. And it's just an rpg maker game with hundreds of thousands of mons
I wouldn't mind if it was their only greedy move but they have to make all their events and web of connectable as complicated and money thirsty as possible.
*web of connectable software
Wow what a shocking and enlightened take. Take my reddit gold and buy yourself some Twitter premium
I don't know if you heard, but that was the original design! That's part of why numerical trainer IDs are coded into the original game, though you can't see them. Miyamoto asked GF to make two static versions instead because it would be easier to share secrets on the playground, which was a huge reason why games like Zelda did so well.
>Releasing two games is an outdated and scummy practice
only if your dumb enough to consoom
So how would that handle legendaries? Would it be something like second Gen where you get one legendary early and the second one is caught later? Would you just need to flip a coin and hope you got the one you wanted?
Version exclusive legendary Pokémon weren't a thing until gen 3.
Tell me if this is scummy OP. Remaking Johto and charging $70 but it’s in LGPE.
Remaking Alola charging $70 but it’s in SWSH. Remaking Unova and charging $70 and adding it to PLA. Remaking Kalos and charging $70 but it’s in SV. Wouldn’t everybody be happy?
Why is it scummy? There’s only a small handful of pokemon between games. It encourages trading with friends. With SV you don’t even have to trade either, you can go into your friends’ game and catch their exclusives yourself.
And even if you don’t have friends available there’s a super robust trading community with these games. I think the move of the GTS from the main games to Home is the only particularly scummy practice, that one’s not forgivable in the slightest. But it’s very easy to find people online to trade with.
>what's the problem? the dick isn't fully up your ass, it's just the tip
Take the shaft out of your ass and explain what the frick's actually wrong with the two version system. If you don't like because you just don't, that's fine, everyone has things like that, but I want to understand the other side.
For how long?
Also, dexit was not needed and a horrible mistake. There's no reason for the dex cut, the cartridges can still take every last one of the Pokemon.
>I think the move of the GTS from the main games to Home is the only particularly scummy practice, that one’s not forgivable in the slightest.
In the context of dexit, centralizing the GTS outside the game is necessary. It's still available for free.
Oh great, another RNG thing to manipulate so I don't have to trade... Eugh. What's wrong with the two versions anyways? Why is it scummy? You're not INTENDED to buy both of them at once(the two packs are more meant so you can give a game each to a pair, like siblings or a couple.)
I'd argue the far scummier act is the DLC that they're doing. At some point, we won't be able to access that DLC legitimately anymore.