>Ruins the amazing writing started by 1 and 2
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>Ruins the amazing writing started by 1 and 2
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>amazing writing
ffs how come everything that isnt outright shit gets called amazing
Yes. 1 and 2 have some of the best writing of any FPS
go play Cold Winter and get back to me
>halo
>amazing writing
wut?
>it's another 'killzonecucks pretend halo 2 wasn't the pinnacle of writing in vidya' thread
Killzone fans don’t exist
reach was the last good halo game. Infinite had potential but it was squandered. Halo 4 and 5 never should have been released
Reach's campaign was fantastic, firefight too
Multiplayer was a regression from 3 with a handful of neat ideas
WTF doesn't infinite have firefight?
reach had a better campaign than halo 3 and ODST and im sick of pretending it didn't
Had ODST kept the atmosphere that Rookie's missions had later on, I'd argue ODST was better
But it wasn't, and Reach's was fricking amazing
ODST was fine but the stakes were too low. The city was already fully invaded and occupied. Reach was awesome seeing the covenant invasion from start to finish
>The stakes were too low
I don't know, I think they were perfect for the story it was trying to tell. This odst squad isn't the chief, they're not going to majorly impact the war and not everything needs massive stakes trying to save the world
not the low stakes per se, but not playing through the full invasion from first contact with covenant scouts to all out war and UNSC loss of the planet
nobody forced you to pretend, reach was a starting point of dividing the fanbase. it was mediocre but zoomers were underage when it came out
multiplayer was mediocre. Campaign was the best halo campaign to date.
and why is that?
witnessing the covenant invasion from start to finish of an entire planet. Not low stakes halo 3 bullshit of them invading one irrelevant city in africa
reach itself is nothingburger when it comes to actual stakes. halo 3 wasn't about invading the earth, it was about the ark and activating all halos to destroy life.
the earth was just the starting point
>Why is the game better
>The story-
No. Why is the GAME better.
the gameplay is unchanged for all of halo. The setting and context that contextualizes the gameplay is best in reach.
not even true. replacing the BR with the DMR made the game much easier than before. also you can sprint your way out of most encounters.
I only claim the campaign was the best. reach multiplayer was mediocre.
>the gameplay is unchanged for all of halo.
This lie is so blatantly wrong I'm concerned for your mental state that you would think you could get away with saying it to anybody. Are you a fricking lunatic?
This. Reach killed the franchise, only zoomers like it.
>Halo
>amazing writing
>caring about Halo's story
lmao
Halo 2 does have some really good dialogue and expanded the scope of the series a lot. Seeing the Covenant side of the story was great.
Unrelated, but I really missed Michael Wincott in Halo 3. Not sure why he wasn’t brought back or why he didn’t want to be apart of the 3rd game.
Because he was a whiny little c**t that got mad because Bungie showed the Prophet of Truth and used his dialogue in their commercial for the game.
>Seeing the Covenant side of the story was great.
Ugh no. Also, making them speak English was an immersion killer. The covenant levels have grown on me since I've played through Halo 2 so often, but they were a total buzzkill originally. You just wanted to play as Master Chief and you just wanted to mow down some covies attacking the Earth. That is what Halo 2 should have been. Covenant attacks Earth and you must repel them. That is how the damn game was advertized as well.
>but muh Halo ring
Just have the game end with the discovery of a new Halo ring. Or have a cliff hanger ending where a Halo ring is somehow teleported above Earth's atmosphere and is a threat to Earth or something.
>Try to play through Halo 3 recently
>Controls taken away from you constantly to watch "AHHHH IM GOING INSANE MASTER CHIEF" bullshit from Cortana
Really fricks up the flow
Starts 2:50
the controls don't get taken away though, that's a blatant lie
Well it slows you to an absolute crawl anyway
The controls are suppressed and your ability to control chief is hampered greatly, so no, he is not lying. Also, yes, it was garbage, and it was annoying.
2 ruined itself by being too ambitious, the whole existence of halo 3 was caused by cutting a lot of things from halo 2. and i don't disagree that halo 2 had a better story but 3 was a fine sequel that improved and innovated upon the second game from a gameplay perspective.
>3 was a fine sequel that improved and innovated upon the second game from a gameplay perspective.
have a nice day. Worst of the trilogy.
>no argument
>amazing writing is ripping off the bible
Are you actually this moronic or is this bait?
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST TAKE THINGS FROM THE BIBLE
*tip
>is the peak of the halo series
Fixed that for you homosexual.
2 was awful you homosexual
>Raped by button combos
Only Halo 1 had good writing.