Seeing as how Old world is getting more funding, what kind of new Bretonian models do you want /tg/?
Will the influence of nu GW destroy the designs?
Seeing as how Old world is getting more funding, what kind of new Bretonian models do you want?
Seeing as how Old world is getting more funding, what kind of new Bretonian models do you want /tg/?
Will the influence of nu GW destroy the designs?
Just fix the fricking knights, please.
Some of the old Bretonnia stuff looks fine, but until they get the horses fixed I'm not interested. Most of them look like shit I can get for a buck from a budget store.
I’d like a bombard like the cities of sigmar have. I’ll be proxying mine as such in the meantime
ask /wfg/
General threads are always circle jerks.
generals killed /tg/ and /wfg/ is full of shit causers and trolls
Teegee would just be shitty coomer spam without generals.
cooming is the only thing that keeps this board alive, you absolute fool. Making it a blue board was a mistake
Heaven forbid we ever have fun here
it's just tedious. oooo what if the monster had breasts hurr durr
Like sure, it's fun. Throw some cheesecake in. But it's all the same shit. how the frick has towergirls been going for a decade?
>inb4 filter it
been done
>getting more funding
It's a confirmed flop TOWtroony. What kind of bizarre cope is this?
In what world does "we have expanded the scope" mean "the game flopped"?
>Expanding the scope
Oh you mean empty words? There is no news about GW bringing new things to TOW. It’s just re-releasing the same old shit plus a campaign book here or there.
Literally all 4 factions released so far have new models, moron. Let me guess, you play Age of Sigmar and feel threatened by TOW
>Immediately has to bring up AoS
Rent free
But you do play Age of Sigmar? Why pretend otherwise?
It doesn’t matter what I play. You have taken the Ganker console war approach to this shit and cannot go 5 minutes without tearing down some other game because you see it as a threat to your game.
>"can't go 5 minutes without tearing down some other game"
>you're the one who, totally unprovoked, barged into the thread to say "YOURE A troony TOW HAS FLOPPED"
Yeah, I'm kinda thinking anon that you're the one who started the console war shit in this thread.
I never said anything about transpeople. You have been insulting people for liking AoS and not just your stupid grognard reprint of a nearly 50 year old game.
>transpeople
You've been calling him "TOWtroony" you delusional jerk. Plus stop pretending trans are people when I'm policing around. 'tis not Leddit nor /aosg/ here.
I haven’t said anything about TOW being inclusive. You’re confusing me with someone else.
I play both AoS and TOW. whats your point?
You TOW gays are so easy to bait it's not even fun to watch.
>hahaha WOW EPIC bit of trolling bro! you sure got them!
I wonder what crazy TROLLING you'll come up with next time man!
You don't need to come up with any EPIC TROLLING. All you need to do is post "I don't think TOW is the most incredible thing in human history" or anything about AoS and you freaks lose your minds.
It's actually Age of Sigmar players who have a reputation for being extremely defensive and sensitive about their game. Just look at the 300+ replies any thread critical of AoS. Look at all the crying gays eager to defend AoS in /wfg/. It's quite funny. You literally cannot be critical of AoS without some zoomer dork homosexual crying and shitting themselves.
Yeah I'm sure it was AoS gays that aped out at the anon daring to suggest TOW may not be a massive bestseller.
>In what world does "we have expanded the scope" mean "the game flopped"?
If that qualifies as "aping out" to you, I WOULD hate to see what how you'd react if GW took away your favourite Stormshart Eternal models lmao
I don't play GW games, I come to these threads to watch you chimps fling poo at each other. It's entertaining how you don't realize you're both the exact same slop consooming GW drones. I sometimes feel I take my hobbying too seriously but then seeing you "people" makes me feel perfectly well adjusted.
I'm quite the opposite guy. I was hating on AoS (and GW) for years for replacing WFB with this clusterfrick. First edition was utterly bad: it had terrible rules, absolutlely and utterly terrible lore and onbnoxious sigmarines. I was mad. Like really mad. I know that AoS' rules are considered decent nowadays, but lore is still terrible, the world inconsistent and has moronic, primitive cosmology - and sigmarines are still there, so I kept being unconvinced.
Then TOW came and I stopped being mad. I just don't care about AoS anymore. I visit AoS store from time to time to check which models from WFB are still available (or decent substitutes like new squigs for example), but that's it. I wish AoS good luck and bid farewell.
"Confirmed flop"
Confirmed by who? By all metrics its exceeded expectation and sells out consistently. They even said so its expanding scope, given we dont ever get access to sales figures what exactly is confirmation of its failure to you?
Ywnbaw, enjoy your ugly female Black characters.
Ignore them, they're just a seething Siggy piggy comstantly saying "TOW is a flop" in all current threads despite all the evidence to the contrary
Siggy seething his sigmarines got taken away by gw 🙁
Poor baby
Towchads keep winning
HAHAHAHAHAHA
but franz isnt in TOW.
>new Bretonian models
No thank you, just re-release the 5E Perry Twins stuff
a Sargent-at-arms model would be nice it's weird that GW didn't produce a model for it already
I think some more women would be good, a unit of female knights? maybe some black representation too
just green fluff som mustache and goatee on her and call it a day
foot knights
Repanse. It seems insane to a fantasy France without a Joan of Arc equivalent. I know she's not part of that timeline but she wasn't part of the default/endtimes timeline either and still made a splash in Total War Warhammer.
Grail knights. The metal/plastic hybrid ones don't look different enough from the realm knights. I'm not saying they have to have holy flames coming out of their weapons as per Total War, but they should look fancier.
I would say mounted yeomen since the old 90's models are part of the Perry/noblebright era and look like historical minis, but does Bretonnia even need fast cav? I mean, why bother marchblocking etc when everything's riding on a turn 2 charge? Pegasus knights are way better for warmachine hunting too.
Why wouldn't we have repanse herself? In WFB there were plenty of special characters that were dead in WFB main timeline, like Azhag the Slaughterer or Grom the Paunch. I really can't see the reason why they can't do this in TOW.
Another vote here for the Maid of Orleanais
>Will the influence of nu GW destroy the designs?
Yes.
I want the new models to blend in with the old so that I can add them to whfb or historical armies I already own. They should employ the Perry twins again, or at least use the same style, instead of this clueless modern WOW shit.
Still waiting for my tk pre order over a month ago
>what kind of new Bretonian models do you want /tg/?
Ones that fit with the old line.
I don't want the old world. I want Warhammer Fantasy back.
>more funding
didnt they cancel the kislev and cathay releases
No.
>nu GW
Ben, you only started this hobby seven years ago.