https://www.psypost.org/2022/06/sexualized-video-games-are-not-causing-harm-to-male-or-female-players-according-to-new-research-63388
>“Overall, the ‘moral panic’ over video games and sexualization is pretty much following the ‘paint-by-numbers’ pattern of the video game debate. Lots of hyperbole and moral outrage, but very little evidence that video games are causing any ‘harm’ to either male or female players,”
Spread the word.
 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
We have known this for years.
we have?
WE have. And so have the people claiming otherwise. It's the middle group that doesn't, the stupid and easily manipulated.
Yea, cool but it doesn't change the fact that most of 'lewd' games are total garbage.
No they fulfill their goals. They cross pollinate new idead for fan artists and doujin artists.
But Neps and Senrans barely have any good doujins. Neps have decent fanart but Senran barely fricking has any.
if the goal is doujins why does censorship matter
t.ranny
I'm pretty sure h games are what breed troonys
no said anything about h games troony. There's a difference between porn and sexual content. Not that your HRT-addled brain could possibly comprehend that.
Which games do you consider good?
>Spread the word
I'll try but i am pretty sure i am going to get ganged and silenced in every gaming website, i mean it's not like i didn't try saying this before and didn't get banned.
>I'll try
That's all I ask. It's probably too late for these findings to make a difference now, but I hope that won't stop anyone from rubbing this in the collective faces of "folks" still on a crusade against artistic freedom.
I hope everyone realizes that this study wasn't done to help bring back sex appeal in games but is actually a tool to help prove that pushing gay and troony characters in games is "healthy" for keeping ds. Expect to see more """sexy""" trannies in Western games while actual females still look like man-jawed goblins.
You are unwell.
He's not wrong though. Progressives do that shit all the time. Notice how they always design trannies as cute or sexy while actual women get designed like men with breasts.
>literal who said it so it must be true
According to your life experience(not internet stuff) what is your opinion about?
If sexualization is harmless why does half this board fap to animated naked 10 year olds?
>animated
what is harmful about that?
It normalizes pedophilia. I'll bet at least 50% of "e-girlcons" end up watching real CP at some point.
Look at this absolute shithole of a website. It's not a coincidence that a website devoted to anime and otaku culture and with minimal moderation became a gathering place for pedophiles.
Nice projection.
Real people are not pretty like my anime drawings, thanks.
This lmao
Children are fricking repulsive, disgusting little snot covered monsters
Heavily stylized and unrealistic fictional cartoons have nothing to do with "pedophilia"
>Children are fricking repulsive, disgusting little snot covered monsters
Why the pedophobia?
How do you feel about depictions of violence? I'd hope you'd have something similar to say about that. I mean cartoons are obviously a gateway to real life fantasy right?
Maybe you WANT them to watch it so you feel normal. But in reality e-girls are too removed from real children in terms of appearance and behavior for the groups to have much overlap.
This, I grew up watching top gun and now I'm an apache helicopter
What's wrong with CP?
He’s right, I played too much GTA in my teenage years and now I can’t get to work without massacring dozens of people.
Upvoted!
>I'll bet at least 50% of "e-girlcons" end up watching real CP at some point.
So? What's bad about that?
What harm that do?
Why are they so sexy if fapping to them is harmful?
Lines on paper have no "age"
>Being a alphabet freak is harmless
Why do they abuse children then?
How many real children get molested due to dicky? Burden of proof homosexual. Provide numbers.
>dicky
Ganker pedo meme
Yes, it is. Now answer the question homosexual.
Danke fren.
We are waiting. Hell I I'll take a israelite statistic from the FBI's website. Find ANYTHING.
None, it gives pedos like you a victimless outlet for your desires, what's the issue again?
>pedo
Passive aggressiveness is for women. Which is fitting since you get mogged in all of what it means to be a female by fricking pictures. But hey, you admitted you were wrong anyway. And thats the first tentative step to fixing it. Good for you Stacy!
indecipherable post
Sorry. I know you don't use the big words often but take it as an chance to use the word book to find the answers.
>no mom it's STYLIZED 10 year old nipples
LOOK OUT ANON I GOT A GUN!
Fictional nude underdeveloped prepubescent children who attend elementary school
JESUS FRICK GET DOWN
Why is the handle so big?
It's a big gun meant for big men with big man hands.
>why does half this board fap to animated naked 10 year olds?
There's a global demand for it, clearly. Hell, I'm willing to bet more are actually into e-girl than they care to admit and the ones throwing the biggest hissy fits online are those that can't accept that facet of their sexuality OR are guilty of far worse than fapping to harmless drawings.
>twitter screencap
Please fricking have a nice day
>downplaying screencaps featuring people who hate e-girl but love real children
>twitter tourist
Opinion discarded
>strawmanning
You're a liberal, aren't you?
This one
is new. Since Twitter triggers you, here's some ResetEra hypocrisy.
>twitter tourist and election tourist
topkek
>topke-
>-ACK!!
>soitard
this is bait
Rich coming from someone posting an old image with a more recent filename.
>The facts are old so they are wrong
Is there a name for this kind of fallacy?
you moralgays always spam the same handful of tired twitter screencaps as proof of your boogeyman, get new material
>t.
The ones sperging about MUH PEDOS usually have more skeletons in their closet
Sure, anon.
This is a good tactic, anons on here should pretend to be opposed to e-girls so leftist could own le chudz by defending 8 year old children twerking in tight shorts
Using their logic then women being sexualized should be allowed as a criticism lmao. Actually hilarious how big breasted women stopped appearing in movies
>real children
You mean children?
Not him, but what's your point? I have no trouble believing pedophiles are ranting about other pedophiles online. Speaking of which, /misc/ loves to whine about LGBT people grooming children, but that doesn't stop many of them from claiming that the age of consent is a israeli ploy to destroy the white race or similar inane shit. They seem to be well tolerated on their board too. Funny how that works.
>muh pol
Why are you so obsessed?
Isn't reddit your echo chamber hugbox?
Why do you seethe when right wingers have one?
Why are you so obsessed with reddit?
Why are you so obsessed with resetera?
Why do you seethe when you are called out on your bullshit?
Why do you think drawings are child porn?
Because all the doujin captions are some shit like "delicious 3rd grader butthole"
That doesn't my question, drawings are not real children, so how is it child porn?
>drawings are not real children
They're fictional children, so it's fictional child porn
The fact that you're getting extremely defensive about this says more about you than anything
Just admit you're a gay and you don't like cute drawings
Pragmata will be fire and can't wait for the dicky kino that will come out
SEETHE
>dicky
Ganker pedo meme
What new kino, anon?
for research purposes of course.
>hates muh pedos
>has shirtless children saved on his computer
Lmao that wasn't the intention of the pic, i just saved it because it's weird
Look anon you can save shirtless children if you want just probably don't post any more
>Not him, but what's your point?
To spread awareness.
e-girlcon is a synonym for pedophile
Google translate isn't a valid source Black persontron. The terms are completely unrelated.
>e-girlta complex
>unrelated
Correct, reaction Black person.
The subjects have nothing in common, therefore the terms are completely unrelated.
>completely unrelated
>uses doujin panels
This really is as pathetic as it gets.
You already are fully aware the subject can only be fictional, meaning it is fully detached from the other's subject, but you're too detached from reality to accept that.
You're too caught up in your own feelings to think properly.
>muh FICTIONAL preschooler nipples
topkek tourist-kun
>calling me a tourist
I know it's just the strategy of your kind to project your status onto anyone disagreeing with you since most users on this site are easy to manipulate, but it's still hilarious that you can't even posit a legible argument of any kind.
There is no "argument" tourist, e-girls are intended to be depictions of children and you should have no problem with that sine they're fictional
>intended to depict children
they're meant to be cute, what you do with that is irrelevant. I'm guessing 100 year old e-girls are a-okay?
It's just a setting dumbass, I could draw a bombshell with z-cups and treat her like a preschooler if i felt like it.
>they're meant to be cute
So why not fap to cute anime men or women instead of little kids?
See
>hag
Pedo dogwhistle
Get the frick off my board with that sit nonce
Pedo website
Lmao pedos have been getting BTFO the entire thread
Frick off back to your deep web forums groomer
maybe in your schizo wonderland.
every point brought up is quickly shut down
Ironics* have been outing themselves as morons and hypocrites.
Pedochads never stop winning.
>my board
you're trying too hard
because maybe you want something cuter?
What kind of response even is this? I could just make a short lady with a e-girl design anyway. Setting is just for flavor, it's fiction.
So draw a cute women with huge breasts, not a preschooler
Nice deflection pedo
maybe they don't want big breasts???
what about oppai e-girls and shortstacks?
Again, preschooler is just setting flavor, it doesn't actually matter.
see
>no see they just made them attend a preschool for no arbitrary reason and regularly remind the reader that they are very young children for just no reason at all
Gigacope
>cope
whatever you say reaction Black person, go back to twitter.
If I made a doujin with a cowbreasts 6ft bimbo playing the role of a 5 yr old preschooler getting fricked by her teacher you wouldn't bat an eye.
It's fiction, do whatever you feel like.
Except it's a doujin of a 3 foot tall short flat preschooler playing the role of a 5 year old preschooler
Nice whataboutism pedo
>whataboutism
first, go back.
second, you proved my point that the role doesn't matter and the design of the character doesn't matter since it's just for personal tastes. So why does combining the two actually mean anything?
It's still just a drawing with attached text with character designs that are fundamentally inhuman.
e-girls are depictions of children
Fictional depictions, yes. What are you not getting?
Based
Cringe cope
>making it this obvious
Sexy fictional depictions of cartoon underdeveloped prepubescent children nude
>The bot is starting to break down
kek
try a little less HRT algorithm next time
Sexy (aka fictional) children. That's the difference.
you will never be normal pedotroony.
The fact that you hate e-girls so much should tell you everything you need to know about any "overlap"
If a Japanese guy wrote a manga character who goes to elementary school you'd call him a troony
Why are you trying so hard?
It's still just a fictional character in a specific setting.
You're a troony because you're trying to group everyone in with you to feel normal.
>le FICTIONAL preschooler nipples
kek ok pedo
>FICTIONAL
Yes. What the frick is wrong with you?
>no mom see it's actually STYLIZED preschooler nipples
>reduced to memeing semantics
You are a broken husk.
What? It's FICTIONAL preschoolers getting fricked in the ass, what's the problem?
You are literally killing PEOPLE in vidya.
I'll report you to the authorities.
>muh violent video games
Reddit
My argument is that preschoolers getting raped is okay as long as it's fictional. Learn reading comprehension moron
>Reddit
Amazing argumentation from a murderer
It's fictional murder just like e-girlcon doujins are fictional preschooler sex
Are you even trying to argue or just hoping for some sort of gotcha?
what point are you even trying to make, how does this relate to anything I posted? maybe you need reading comprehension? You're just spouting off like a moron.
I'm agreeing with you, naked sexy preschoolers getting raped is okay since it's fictional, you shouldn't have any problem with this
Than what's your beef with
, dumbass?
Did you not like me saying e-girlcons aren't pedophiles?
You can't "be" a e-girlcon, you can fap to fictional comics depicting beautiful sexy children having sex but unironically "self identifying" as a "e-girlcon" is troony tier
What the frick kind of logic is this?
"self identify" what the frick, what kind of twitter pedantry is this?
Is this some kind of backpedal? why did you even respond if your brain is this poorly developed? Stick to lurking next time.
Seethe pedo
e-girlcons are pedophiles. Always have been. Always will be.
This is literally just a petite woman
>still no argument
fiction is okay and only fiction is okay.
>reaction Black folk
>no actual arguments
go back
Bot? I just like e-girlcon art since it depicts little prepubescent children nude, what's the issue? It's fiction remember?
you tell me if this is a legible human sentence moron.
fiction is always okay, don't just assume everyone is like you though.
>n-no the preschool is just a SETTING so what if it arouses me
holy cope
> pedotroony is a soijak Black person
I'm really not surprised at this point that your just a twitter tourist, I'm just disappointed you gave in this easily.
If the setting makes sense to the writer, I say go ahead. If a big boobie bombshell elicits a similar response in said setting, it's probably just enjoying taboo.
>ok yes im aroused by preschools but it's.. LE TABOO
topkek
>but
*because
moron
this is literally how normal humans function, exploring taboo is seen as normal by actual psychologists. The problem occurs when you actually harm people.
Out of the thousands of possible "taboo" options you specifically choose a preschool of all things
This bizzare rationalization is actually more dangerous than just owning up to it
>specifically chose
you do realize people can fap to multiple things, right?
how is anything about this even tangentially dangerous? actually posit a point instead of assuming shaming people on Ganker is a vain effort.
I love e-girls as they depict sexy prepubescent children in sexual situations
Projection much?
Hey man, if you interact with it in that way that's on you. At least you got a healthy outlet.
You're still not a pedophile unless you want actual humans. Don't just align with anyone who's clearly just trying to drag you down with them.
>sexy prepubescent children
>not a pedophile
Bravo anon
And that's a good thing.
*idealized
Often with very adult like features not found on the real thing. As well as straight up bullshit features not found on the real thing or any human being at all.
Not that body appearance means anything at all. It's 100% legal and not morally wrong to frick women who looks like literal children. They exist. Yet drawings are too much? Frick out of there
Don't make me defend e-girls when hags are so obviously superior.
This looks absolutely nothing like a woman, it's obviously very stylized and doesn't even have the same proportions as a woman, no woman has big eyes like this
If you think I'm "hetero" for liking this you're probably just projecting
>This looks absolutely nothing like a woman
That's the best part.
You think we were joking about the whole 2D > 3D thing?
yes goy stay in a dark room and jerk off to asian cartoons!
That's the plan, tran.
heterosexuality is normal and many gay men find anime girls attractive but not real ones. I personally would frick the ever living shit out of astolfo with long steamy make out sessions, but I very much am not gay.
pedophilia is a mental illness and e-girlcons just like cute anime girls with unique body types.
>unique body types
odd way to say prepubescent
most e-girls don't actually have realistic enough bodies to be considered "prepubescent" not even getting into the fact that drawings aren't capable of being pubescent
>most e-girls don't actually have realistic enough bodies
Maybe in your twitter threads
maybe in your bunker
Why would you go to prison over drawings moron
Don't tell me you're a bong
never (you) me again
>e-girls are le scaled down midgets
You're either a turbonormalgay or me and you are reading different doujin
>calling hags hags
Fake haglover spotted. You're an ironic e-girlcon posing as a haglover.
Pedophilia is no longer classified as a mental illness by DSM, which by the away agrees that e-girlcon = pedophilia. See
That's right! This is clearly just a petite midget. So true, ironicsister! Let's keep ratio-ing those pedos trying to invade the e-girlcon community!
I don't care what leftist organization has say about anything.
still not a realistic design
>leftist organization
Then where do you get your "pedophilia is a mental illness" meme from? If you don't believe in DSM, then your statement has even less basis in reality.
Logic?
adult humans shouldn't be going after kids, they can't birth children yet and those that can would suffer bodily harm.
seek God
"mental illness" is a israeli buzzword
>adult humans shouldn't be going after kids, they can't birth children yet and those that can would suffer bodily harm
But it has been normal and accepted for 99% of human history? How can that be a mental illness? Also sex isn't just for procreation and veganal sex isn't the only type of sexual contact. What about men who are attracted to infertile women? Are they mentally ill as well?
>What about men who are attracted to infertile women? Are they mentally ill as well?
Yes.
makes sense, through most of human history, humans have had to brith at young ages due to short life expectancy and to keep up with populations dying from all sorts of natural and unnatural causes.
For the modern day, the prerogative no longer exists. People use their eyes to gauge attractiveness, so it makes sense that an infertile women could be perceived as attractive, but like a trap, sex would be fruitless. The man is not at fault, but he should look elsewhere.
Most young girls will at least eventually be able to birth children while traps or infertile women never will.
>Dude I've been around little kids, I would not do. They're just too stupid.
Maybe you've only been around 4-year-olds and not precocious 10-year-olds. Either that or you are lying to yourself. 10yo girls want wiener. I have an 11yo sister who has a 10yo friend. She tells me that her friend is constantly talking about wanting sex.
Only specific attraction to young girls with nonfunctioning wombs is mental illness.
If your taste varies, I guess it's fine, but child-birthing is a must. In the modern day, it's considered more logical to go for adults since they can conceive safely. But nature would say 15 and up is okay.
This is mostly correct.
>Only specific attraction to young girls with nonfunctioning wombs is mental illness
Almost no one is like that. Exclusive pedos are mostly a meme.
Where? I'm a Ganker native.
>Japanese men who aren't proud pedos aren't real e-girlcons
Correct.
anon why the frick are you fapping to preschooler sex comics
not an argument.
Personally I prefer e-girls to be a bit older. JS is okay for me.
>JS
>literally using Japanese grade school designations
yikes... the e-girlcon Community will NOT tolerate this
8 is probably my favorite e-girl age, they smell great too
10-12 is the sweet spot imo. Perfect size to use as a hug pillow.
I'm more into short flat girls.
Post an example of this so called "unrealisticness"
>implying stale twitter screencaps are "arguments"
What screencaps?
your brain is melting, not everyone in this thread is the same person.
I haven't even posted one image.
>reading through all of that doujin just to own weebs
By your own logic, you've consumed a fair amount of CP yourself.
I admire your dedication, at least.
I consume all sorts of 2d and I'm not an insecure moron who feels the need to do a mile of mental gymnastics whenever someone calls depictions of children depictions of children
Fap to whatever you want who cares, this defensive overcompensation is more suspicious than anything
>his defensive overcompensation is more suspicious than anything
>Alex what's a Kafka trap?
There's a difference between simply saying "nah im not a pedo" and going full fight or flight mode whenever someone mentions your naked kid cartoons
>I'm not an insecure moron who feels the need to do a mile of mental gymnastics whenever someone calls depictions of children depictions of children
Regardless of the content, a depiction isn't a photograph. The reason people are giving you shit is because "folks" (like pic related) opposed to artistic freedom always insist that drawings of fictional characters are just as real/harmful as actual child pornography featuring living, breathing victims.
If I misunderstood your post, I apologize in advance. Personally, I don't care if someone calls me a pedo for loving e-girl. Accusations like that help gatekeep secondaries/ironic weebs from infecting what I like with their grandstanding anyway.
>a depiction isn't a photograph
Literally nobody claimed this you braindead strawmanning redditor
Then what's the problem?
The problem is moronic tourists who feel the compulsive urge to constantly create these bizzare rationalizations to defend their kiddie sex cartoons instead of just owning up to it and being indifferent
You can literally post a collage of doujin captions about "delicious preschooler nipples" and they'll find some way to cope, it's incredibly annoying
calling everyone you disagree with a tourist doesn't actually do anything troony-kun. It's an anonymous board, no one actually cares about what you say or think.
e-girlcons aren't pedophiles and you will never be normal.
>e-girlcons aren't pedophiles
>Male yaoi fans aren't gay
Sure thing pedo
aren't pedophiles
Yes
what the frick
>because you envy the young
Open and shut case
Attractiveness in females peaks at age 12, that much is proven
Older women are SEETHING they aren't that attractive anymore
But according to that webm, attraction to 12-year-olds is still pedophilia and "not normal."
Then the majority of men is sick
Which is definitely not how we define illness
hey man that astolfo doujin was just too good.
I tried to explain a possible reason for the defensiveness here
Not saying you're wrong, just that there are "folks" out there that will use whatever methods they can to get e-girl banned; including categorizing it as CP when there are no real children involved.
nobody care copeBlack person
back to twitter
*fictional CP
Jesus fricking Christ.
>doujin panels have degenerate text
what exactly is surprising about this tourist-chan?
You do realize this is still an anime site?
How many times do you need to be spoonfed with dictionary definitions, ironichomosexual?
https://www.wordsense.eu/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3/
https://www.almaany.com/en/dict/en-jp/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3/
https://www.linguee.com/japanese-english/translation/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3.html
https://jisho.org/search/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3%E3%83%97%E3%83%AC%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9
https://ja.bab.la/%E8%BE%9E%E6%9B%B8/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%9E-%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3
https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3
You consistently ignore e-girl artists such as Bubukka, Mammoth/Dorontabi, Kereno, Typehatena, Haguhagu, Walkalone, MUK, Shamonabe, and Onimaru who are proud pedos and only focus on people who have expressed an anti-e-girl or anti-anime opinion once or twice getting caught for crimes.
All those artists are garbage and of course we call them out for being disgusting pedo freaks
Get the frick out of our thread nonce
>Bubukka is garbage
have a nice day, ironic.
Literally everyone here agrees with me lmao
You lost groomer, go back to your deep web forums
I don't, newbie.
>dictionary definitions
>actual lists them like sources like a deranged troony
Why, for the love of God, did you think sources controlled by woke trannies would help your point. We're talking about e-girlcons, you know the one who like shit like Illya?
What is the point?
>Illya
She's 11.
In the relevant, canon fate series she's older than shiro
She's like ninteen.
>nineteen
>e-girl
The absolute state
It's not my fault she's a 19 yo e-girl.
Also e-girls can have any age, just like kanna being a 3000 yo e-girl.
>literal muh 3000 year old e-girl reddit cope
Sides: in orbit
The word itself comes from e-girlta, you know the book about a man listing over 12 year olds
You're coping hard
you mean the russian book? the russian word that has nothing to do with the japanese term?
why does the source of the word even matter you embodiment of brain rot. In the MODERN day it is slang for a type of anime grill.
>the russian word that has nothing to do with the japanese term?
>the Japanese loanward from a Russian book has nothing to do with it
It's not even a Russian word topkek
Cope pedo
It was the title of the book you insufferable moron.
why would that even help your point, the modern usage has nothing to do with its origin
>the modern usage has nothing to do with its origin
>doujins of 12 year olds getting romanced by adult men have nothing to do with a book about 12 year olds getting romanced by adult men
40 keks
Correct. It refers to stylized fictional designs nowadays and whatever situations they are in. The original was just a story of a guy in love with a child. so unrelated.
Did you think this was a gotcha of some sort?
>stylized fictional designs
Right fictional prepubescent children
Literally nothing wrong with fiction
>muh stylized
https://www.newgon.net/wiki/e-girlcon-MAP_Equivalence_Debate
>3. Stylistic appeal: "Stylized images of humans (e.g. e-girl facial features) are more arousing *because* of the stylistic features. We are not attracted to real children."
>Accepting that as a premise, then why do e-girlcons idealize stylized children over adults? We can only conclude classical pedophilia/hebephilia or alternatively some kind of deviance fetishization in the person who finds this material arousing.
Except e-girls don't "depict" children to begin with
Nice loaded argument nonce
Let me guess, the artist was just being edgy when he made this line?
>mistranslation
>everything I don't like is a mistranslation
>jacked off
might as well go all out with the wording
yupiel-sama isn't a child, but her doujin would considered e-girlcon anyway.
>deviance
did you not read this part?
>yupiel-sama isn't a child
She has the body of the child and calls the guy who gets attracted to her a virgin pedophile.
so midgets can't have sex? Her being an adult should be enough.
the fact you even know of that wiki its proof enough of something going pretty wrong in your head.
Bruh pedos are fricking mental
Literally just ignore them dickybros, they hate anime
Unfortunately I still know some dickyggers who unironically are pedo scums as well and there are more than you think.
Oh look at that, case in point.
I have an hard time defending you cucks now.
>the guys who like drawings of naked little kids are pedos
>dickybros
Why are you using a literal pedo meme from Ganker?
>they hate anime
I have watched more anime than you.
>e-girls are "fictional" children
Yes, that's exactly what they are.
>he thinks he can regulate child porn
not gonna happen lmao. at least guns are physical. cp can be digital.
The vast majority of 2D e-girls have ages of kids and look like kids. Your exceptions that you so desperately cling to are not the rule.
In case you haven't dealt with it before, Cluster Bs are absolutely obsessed with getting you to admit to wrongdoing. Normally you encounter this sentiment in a form more like "you liked that waitress who smiled at you didn't you" but it can manifest in other ways. With this guy (who appears in literally every topic and is clearly obsessed with this subject likely because of pedophilic tendencies) it is getting to say e-girlcon = pedophilia.
Another classic Cluster B tactic is where they insist "there's nothing wrong if you like the waitress, I understand." But heaven help you if you fall for this. If you even hint that yes, you thought the waitress was attractive, perhaps in the hope of getting them to drop the subject they'll immediately use it against you and escalate. In this guy's case, he wants you to say there is no distinction between full-on child pornography and e-girlcon, which then provides him with the ammo he needs to say that "e-girlcon is bad = e-girlcon leads to genuine pedophilia = e-girlcon therefore needs to be banned." This entire debate is a trap. His goal is to wear you down until you finally say "fine then, I'm a pedophile" and then use that admission to argue his ultimate point, which is that e-girl should be banned.
Nearly all SJWs are Cluster Bs. Both the pathological need for attention and the desire to psychologically dominate other people are classic features, distinct from the anxious Cluster Cs (avoidants/shy, common on /LULZ/) or reclusive Cluster As (schizoids, extremely common on Ganker).
Ah yes the kafka trap
literally didn't read your armchair psychologist walltext lmao
Glad someone saw through this shit. I had no idea this was an established tactic but I'll keep an eye out for it from now on.
Also explains why the replies to
were so weak.
Just ignore the nonces e-girlbros, they literally hate anime
There are pedos who enjoy anime and e-girls, including the artists who draw the shit you fap to. Get over it, homosexual.
>le ebin pipe xD
Why do Japanese e-girlcons never use this cope? Oh, right: because they don't live in the Pedophobic States of America.
Pedos are the real "ironic e-girlcons" they barely know anything about anime yet appropriate our identity because some edgelord told them e-girls are "le drawn children"
I have watched more than anime than you.
I have access to private anime torrent trackers.
I know more Japanese than you.
I read untranslated e-girl h-manga and h-games.
Cope, ironic e-girlcon.
>doubt
Whatever you say.
Nah, I'll stay.
Go back to kohlchan
>Japanese people are woke trannies
e-girlcon means pedophile in Japanese. Cope, seethe, and dilate, ironic e-girlcon.
And you should go back to
.
there are plenty of woke trannies and israelites in japan nimrod. The fact that kadokawa and jump are moving towards woke policies proves this.
The media there has been demonizing anime and e-girlcons for years. Why would anyone trust their clearly biased word.
>e-girlcons
You can't "be" a e-girlcon troony
die troony Black person.
You can't "be" a e-girlcon you braindead troon
Sorry everyone thinks your identity politics is homosexual tier
have a nice day troony
If you unironically "self identify" as a e-girlcon you're a massive homosexual
What? where did you read this about kadokawa? I still see newly released hentai games with e-girls that have the kadokawa logo in them
some statement released recently about implementing ESG and their CEO is part of the NWO, alongside every billionaire trying to ruin the world.
>You consistently ignore e-girl artists and only focus on people who have expressed an anti-e-girl or anti-anime opinion once or twice getting caught for crimes
Well, yeah. The latter hate the concept of artistic freedom while acting like virtuous paragons despite being criminals.
I'm not sure what you hope to accomplish besides derailing the thread. The study must've really rattled you...
Nobody cares that anti-pedos can also be pedos. Just fap to e-girls. Why do you want to be some sort of online keyboard warrior?
lol
Japan barely has any israelites, you absolute moron.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/israeli_population_by_country
>anti-pedos can also be pedos
Sort of like ironic e-girlcons
e-girlcon is pedophilia.
e-girlcon is good.
If you hold the former opinion but not the latter, you're an anti-e-girlcon. If you hold only the latter opinion but not the former, you're an ironic e-girlcon. If you hold both opinions, you're an unironic e-girlcon a.k.a. a based chad.
It's really simple.
True.
Hilarious that muttland has more israelites than israel
>Why do you want to be some sort of online keyboard warrior?
Is that not what you're doing? Just fap to e-girls, lol.
I'm not the one who seethes over people calling me a pedo on the internet. I embrace the label.
You can look up history and find that age of consent is feminist bullshit has nothing to do with nature or reality. You don't need pol to tell you that even some leftists think that.
When I see posts like these I always wonder how you freaks envision your ideal society. You know, there are pedophiles who just want to rape children, and then there are those who bring morality into it. So tell us, what should a family's reaction be upon hearing their child has been raped in a society where natural order has been restored? They should just shrug and say that's just how things work? What arguments would you use to convince a father who is about to smash your head in that what you did is totally fine and based and redpilled and it's just those evil feminists who convinced society it's not?
Just kill the rapist it's not hard. Child brides are the answer to males wanting young females and it's not like they will always find them but there is an option.
>Child brides are the answer
Underage couples should not have a age gap greater than 3 years, especially for marriage. As for adult couples, the age gap should not be greater then 8 to 12 years with the earliest being the age of consent of your nation/ state.
Say what you want about pair bonding not working after she turns 16 or whatever but marrying a girl old enough to be your kid is utterly sad at best and fricking creepy at its worst.
Fricking prostitutes is fine regardless of the age gap, That is because prostitutes don't matter
Age gap isn't a problem and males being much older was the norm.
>males being much older was the norm
Only among lords and merchants, both of which were shitheads.
The point is people lives shouldn't be controlled by numbers and left to people to sort themselves socially. Social engineering is a crime against humanity.
>Social engineering is a crime against humanity
Is this really that though? I have no issues with a couple getting married and having kids in their early teens if it's for the best for their community and while I have self admitted to having limits on age gap's, Age gaps in-themselves are normally fine. No the reason I have a Issue with age gap "Child" marriages is that it falls under grooming and frankly frick that. Not to mention you are basically stealing girls from their own age bracket meaning there are less girls for the dudes her age. Marring early teen girls to grown-ass men only makes sense in medical society anyway since half of the men would end up dying via war, disease and other shit.
e-girl x Shota > e-girl x older dude
You aren't stealing anything no one is assigned as 1 to 1 also you will make children faster and more age availability for marriage in market mean more choices and faster to make children. So not enough argument is useless.
Is it, I mean say for instants that party a) is a couple of 2 13 year olds and party b) is a 13 year old and a 28 year old. Say if they had a kid a year intil the youngest turned 50, which party would have the most healthy kids?
Who knows? Plus it's not easy to have one each year.
The age of consent is arbitrary anyway. Should be 14, disallowing relationships with people that hold power over one another (student-teacher). That's - believe it or not - how the entire world but America handles it
>downplaying screencaps featuring Japanese e-girlcon artists being proud pedophiles who love both 2D e-girls and real children
>downplaying screencaps featuring Japanese e-girlcon artists
When did I do that?
>the fat japanese guys who draw my naked kid cartoons are... PEDOS?
topjej
???
>???
kys
Ironic e-girlcons literally can't resist outing themselves as tourists
>pedos pointing the finger at other pedos
>twitter screencap
literally didn't read
by this same logic you're "projecting" by spamming the same stale twitter screencaps for years
Burdern of proof. PROOF we molest kids due to pictures. When you do then you'll win. Until then we win.
>13-year-old student
Based
>13-year-old boy
Cringe
He is homosexual and homosexuals frick young males too.
>twitter screencap
Males are attracted to females so if a male hit puberty at 9 he can only be attracted to 18+? Truth is males find young females sexy too.
Because 10-year-olds are cuter than old hags, of course. Next question?
we already know
God, I love 10yo girls.
>If sexualization is harmless why does half this board fap to animated naked 10 year olds?
You answered you own question in the question itself.
So?
Literally nobody would be harmed if people just fapped to drawings.
Speak for yourself
as long as they dont rape anyone, it's fine by me
Yeah raping 10 year olds is fine as long as it's fiction
I think it's disgusting but I can hide threads so complaining feels like a moot point.
Because violating taboos is edgy and Ganker is full of edgelords.
>that projection
> Only an absolute moronic whould base his real world behaviour in fictional media
What a shock
Reminder that devs and journos pander to these insane homosexuals
Who don't buy their games.
>Berg
The saddest part was his schizophrenia was caused by learning of his brother's accident and the truth of him being mutilated by accident
what about irresponsible parents? they dont give a flying frick about age restrictions
Yeah no shit, thanks for nothing.
Who cares if it harmless? Sexualization makes me not respect the game and especially its story. Look at this shit (pic related). It's from a murder mystery VN where the story is or atleast should be the focus. Apparantly it's one of the main characters. How can you take it seriously in any way?
Because the writing would be good. And THEN we fap. It can be done you know.
Isn't that from the Troon game that praises alphabet freaks in some dialogues?
The game is goofy as frick yet you draw the line on the fricking sexy costume?
Im not dumb enough to play that garbage.
Why do you need to take a child's toy seriously?
Uhhh sweaty resetera disagrees
>"Eww why is there a bath house scene in a Tales game"
homie, Tales has been fujoshit for years and I say this as a Mikleo stan.
>forespoken is coming out next year, great example of good character design
I refuse actual functioning humans browse and post on that website
Why people don't just fricking raid moronera to bring it down to its knees is beyond me; How can someone read all that shit and think there's a functional member of society behind those posts?
Mods are in the pocket of lefties. We aren't allowed to raid anymore or organize anything. And since Frenchan is a shill op, I shit you not it was tied to both of the recent "school shootings" ie: satanic sacrifices, we don't have any shit to do it on. Maybe Encyclopedia Dramatica if it had a way to forum on a topic? I dunno man. It would be easy though. I bet even a low tier script kiddie could hack moronera.
Take your meds.
You're a pedophile and a troony and you will never pass. Not a single child who shows interest in you genuinely likes you, you haven't gained any of your moderation status on this site through merit. You're worthless and will burn in hell for eternity.
We've known this for literal decades, anon. The only thing that's changed is the party b***hing about sexy girls in video games - used to be, it was conservatives, now it's liberals.
>MUH HECKIN JESUS IS LE EVIL BECAUSE HE WANTS TO CENSOR THE GAYS!!! CONSERVATARDS BTFO!!!
>Im correct because I said so
Not even remotely what I said, you hysterical woman. Back in the day, bored housewives complained about too much sexy stuff in videogames because it offended their conservative sensibilities. These days, obnoxious feminists complain about too much sexy stuff in videogames because it devalues women or some equally inane nonsense.
goddamnit, now i regret not getting this game during the sale...
The reality is most of this studies are pointless by themselves. The truth starts showing up once you get dozens and dozens of studies saying the same thing and replicating results. When you hear "study said xyz" is almost always misrepresented. Its why psychologist practice things like CBT* for OCD, they arrived at it via research.
*Cognitive behavioral theraphy, not wiener ball torture.
>someone mentions e-girlshit
>everyone starts freaking out
Way to prove him right.
the chad
>Yes im a pedophile, so?
vs the virgin
>m-muh STYLIZED 1000 YEAR OLD PETITE MIDGET
>conservatives
begone degenerates don't groom out children deus vult!
>also conservatives
why can't I fap to this children's game THIS IS CENSORSHIP
which way modern man?
gays are wrong and straight people are correct nothing hard to understand.
>strawmanning this hard
none of these games are for kids, censoring sexual content from mature games is clearly wrong.
>mention animated 10 year olds
>newbie goes full defense mode and frantically spams irrelevant screencaps from normalgay sites
You love to see it
>continues to samegay while ignoring replies and attempting to derail the thread
This study really pissed you off, didn't it? Does the concept of artistic freedom really bother you that much?
Thanks for the bumps, though.
>artistic freedom
Artistic freedom to draw any age child you want getting fricked
Yes what's the issue?
>Yes what's the issue?
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Congratulations, you played yourself.
Yes, sexy preschoolers getting raped is ok if it's fictional. And?
OI DELETE THIS
BOOBS ARE BAD BECAUSE.............................................................................................................................................................THEY JUST ARE OK??!
>This thread
>"You're the pedophile!"
>"No you're the pedophile"
lmao
I've always been one to love life and hometown. I never stopped believing.
Please shut the frick up and enjoy some Art
Of it fricking is, looking at sexy women on the street isn't harmful. Maybe the midwits will not listen to reason if there's studies on this shit. Fricking feminist femcels and their sexual insecurities fricked this industry's growth sideways.
Why are children so damn cute? I wish little girls were real.
Bruh this argument is pointless, you can call someone pedo all you want but you cannot punish him legally if there isn't any harmful action that includes a victim. You cannot punish on speculation, it's like saying "anyone who owns gun should be locked in prison"
>Bruh
Good, im glad pedos have a fictional and harmless outlet for their desires
>Sexualization is Harmless
Then how come i stop waiting to have a hot gf and nowdays i wish to be a hot girl?
How come I've been fapping to some of the most degenerate stuff for almost 2 decades and have zero desires to be a girl or look at even more degenerate content?
Nah I dont buy it. We can intuitively know that media shapes the way we think. No reason to think coomer games can't either. I think we can intuitively know that sexualized media will make you think in a more sexualized manner, ergo a more demeaning and sexist manner.
if that were true i'd be a wokegay by now given how omnipresent it is in media
Woah, the same side that screeched "videogames cause violence" is wrong AGAIN?
they have known that its harmless, its about marketing. They already have male audience, if they want women playing the games they need to pander to them
DON'T WORRY I WILL SAVE SENRAN KAGURA with my drawings
cute, post more
you again with this thread?
who again with this thread
the coomer living in your head
>research
What happened to society to to make any moronic shit spouted by some fricking nobody "research"? Fricking lol
The opposite is true. The more women complain and ruin things for men, the more mass shootings committed by incels.
I think the industry is starting to understand this.
The world is healing.
??? It's all japanese and soulless asiatic shit.
we will never go back to sexy babes being the norm
or maybe they're still pandering, but the target audience is now you
If that's what the artists want, who am I to argue?
That's all fine and good but it doesn't stop the absolute fact that it's turning this board into blue /h/. I want to talk about video games here, not look at porn dumps.
It does hurt. It hurts my dick from beating it so much.
By the time men go "extinct" we'll already have artificial wombs and fricking space colonies breeding space marine clones, completely negating any possibility of a feminist's wet dream of men not existing.
And yet jealous fat women will still b***h and whine.
Hope Sony gets the memo.
>To protect the children
Funny that the pedo homosexual vice president was still with Sony when this article was posted. Who knows how many others like him are still in the company and who know how many minors they have and still are molesting
This is just video games don't cause violence, we've known this for decades. The people who disagree won't change their minds from this just like the people who argued for violence didn't change their minds at that either.
Right, e-girlcon actually gives pedos like you a fictional harmless outlet for your desires
It's a good thing
Sorry bro I like my women with unreasonably large breasts, asses, pubic hair, and large wieners.
>The people who disagree won't change their minds from this
No, but it'll piss them off. Just look at this thread.
why is it so easy to BTFO a dicky hater?
A woman's role is to get pregnant early in life.
There's no such thing as an ironic e-girlcon. Anyone that uses the term is only trying to drive a wedge between weebs and derail threads in general.
So long as you like e-girl, you're fine by me. I don't care about any other opinion you hold.
>There's no such thing as an ironic e-girlcon
Yes, there is. If you call yourself a e-girlcon but deny being a pedophile or being attracted to real children, you're an ironic e-girlcon. Why is this so hard for you morons?
There is nothing wrong with being a pedophile/MAP.
Midgets and children look nothing alike and I never said they can't have sex. Why do you keep assuming I'm anti-e-girl/anti-pedo?
>real children
>implying e-girls are "fictional" children
Frick off pedo
It's a stylized drawing dumbass-kun. Canonically, she's just a midget that looks childish to you.
e-girlcon isn't necessarily relating to kids, that's all. Legal e-girls and oppai e-girls are fair game.
This, e-girlsho has nothing to do with "children"
Too late. The West has lost the sensibility required for tasteful sexualization.
So does this mean morons can stop b***hing about how "coomers" are ruining everything because they hate that hetero men like looking at women's bodies?
No they'll still do it. It was always a dishonest argument by roasties and jealous trannies.
They'll never stop since they want fanservice quarantined to porn. Best thing to do is constantly rub this shit in their collective faces whenever they start b***hing again.
Kill all moronic normalhomosexuals or tourists.
This, ironic pedos get the rope
have a nice day, moron. We already know where you invasive shit are from.
>ironic pedo
have a nice day, moron.
>ironic pedo
It's too late.
>Japan is awesome, everyone else sucks!: the game
Good riddance
lmao
Nah I saw that.
It's over, I've won.
>lmao
It's too late brain rot-chan, e-girlcons won.
>ironic pedos won
Yeah, until some incel snaps and starts a massacre with his legally purchased weapon.
I stand with pornography and gun regulation.
>he thinks he can regulate pornorgraphy
not gonna happen lmao. at least guns are physical. porn can be digital.
And digital guns do the same just like the Highland Park trumptard incel
According to you
And yet the portrayal of women as equals does harm both men and women.
I remember a while back I was having this same discussion on some forum, it was the same typical arguments, e-girlcon leads to child abuse, e-girlcon artists sometimes trace real cp, but there's one irrefutable argument that works every time:
Reply to this post or your mother will die in her sleep tonight
NIGGGAAAAAAA
Damn you
kkkkkkkkkkkkkauisdhasudghashdauhda
don't worry bros
People who hate sexualization in vidya are either
>brainlets who can't separate fantasy from reality
>people who have something sketchy to hide
>fantasy from reality
This is the most moronic wording ever
>heh, it's merely the FANTASY of preschooler nipples, checkmate!
There honestly isn't anything wrong with that. It sounds gross, but no one(with a brain) would actually care.
It's true though. irl pedo stuff is wrong because it hurts irl kids. But in fiction no one is harmed, and everybody should have the right to jerk it to whatever they want, morally correct or not.
>b-b-but it's mental illness
so what? I don't see you complaining about furries jerking it to dogs and it's not a crime so long as they dont actually go frick irl dogs and as far as I know, it hasn't happened.
I don't really give a frick about what you fap to, hell I fapped to e-girl a few times too.
I just laugh at the mental gymnastics.
This, they get so oddly defensive
It's just funny to watch
You're not some 'based' third party, your just some homosexual who's apathetic about actual pedophiles.
>actual pedophiles
>OH NO THERES PEDOS IN MY NAKED LITTLE GIRL vegana CARTOONS COMMUNITY
who the frick cares
i dont think sexualized games cause harm i think morons that cry when they dont get videogame breasts cause harm to themselves and those around them for having such a gamered sense of taste that they literally cannot enjoy a game if they make a single character start wearing pants
>i think morons that cry when they get videogame breasts cause harm to themselves and those around them for having such a shit sense of taste that they literally cannot enjoy a game if a single character isn't wearing pants
Fixed.
Big Sterling fan, I assume?
I just think they're cute
Reminder that resetera defended Cuties (netflix)
makes sense that actual pedophiles would hate e-girls so much. They literally can't get off to it, so demonizing it doesn't affect them while also providing a handy smokescreen
>actual pedophiles
You mean pedophiles?
Just like gays can't get off to yaoi wieners?
This is next level coping
cope and sneed
>ironic pedo is also a sneedposter
>actual pedo has a park avenue manicure
>"actual" pedo
kek
gucci shoes too
Screencap here
if you're curious.
Cuties is good.
Drawn e-girls are also good.
Girls were ugly almost male looking. If they're better looking would've been much better.
Only the blonde and fat one were ugly in my opinion. The rest of the Cuties were alright (not great though). The main black girl was definitely fappable.
Get the frick out of our thread groomers
*Ahem*
>generic ironic e-girlcon Twitter meme #1821
>makes sense that actual pedophiles would hate e-girls so much
???
I love e-girls.
>They literally can't get off to it
And I do get off to it. Wanna see my e-girl h-games folder?
I see nothing wrong with lewd games, just age gate them properly
wow, it's almost as though drawings of things are not actually those things, and in fact bear only a passing superficial resemblance to those things
I smoke a pipe every day and can confirm this looks nearly identical
>no mom see it's SUPERFICIAL preschooler nipples
topkek ironic pedo
Just like anon pointed out it's healthy to have a safe outlet for your desires, otherwise you end up like the guy who contained years of anger and ended up releasing them on the dude who gave him the wrong coffee.
I don't hate ecchi because of some moralistic bullshit, I hate it because it's an excuse to be a lazy writer. Either write porn or write a story, don't waste your time or talents on something that's lackluster on both ends.
sure troony. Quality is your absolute prerogative.
Plenty of people can do both, plenty have.
A tastlet troony that can only enjoy full nudity and sex is completely lost to israelite hands.
Not saying it's not possible, just that it's far less likely. Senran Kagura is ecchi and trash, Prison school is ecchi and good. The difference being ecchi is at the core of prison school whereas its a candy coating in senran
no. You don't care about quality. Even if you did, you'd just ignore them and let anons have their fun. Plenty of media can have it as coating and still be good. It doesn't actually matter.
You're allowed to expect more out of your media
And I want ecchi and quality in the same package. Something I actively seek out, even if it needs mods.
Can't we just agree that the most certain way to identify a e-girlcon as a pedophile is through psychiatric evaluation?
Also, why is the ironic schizo so obsessed with Twittergays?
>Can't we just agree that the most certain way to identify a e-girlcon as a pedophile is through the fact that they fap to naked kid cartoons?
It's not necessarily an indicator of pedophilia, it's just anime drawings
>All e-girlcons are pedophiles since they mean the exact same thing in Japan. Everything else is western cope.
I think the forget the existence of 2D-exclusive e-girlcons
What can say? I have a preference for older e-girls
>older e-girls
yikes e-girlsister... lines on paper cannot have an "age" bigot
Again, why are you so obsessed with Twittergays?
Yes, e-girls have ages, if that wasn't the case we wouldn't have gohoe-girls or e-girlbabas
when did i mention twitter schizo
Lines on paper cannot have an "age" since they're not biological organisms, they're fictional cartoons you fricking troony
>I think the forget the existence of 2D-exclusive e-girlcons
Even if you actually are "2D-exclusive", you're still a pedo. If you're a guy who only jerk offs to yaoi drawings and nothing else, you're still a gay. Similarly, you're still a e-girlcon even if you only fap to drawings of children.
"no"
>you're still a e-girlcon
you're still a pedo*
>Even if you actually are "2D-exclusive", you're still a pedo
Well, I guess that would make me a pedo for fictional girls
>If you're a guy who only jerk offs to yaoi drawings and nothing else, you're still a gay
No one's bound to just one genre of hentai, and do you realize that traps are a popular genre? To add to that, some of the biggest consumers of yaoi are LESBIANS
>Similarly, you're still a e-girlcon even if you only fap to drawings of children.
I guess I can agree with that
I don't know if you're the same guy or not, but it's obvious the one posting all the "anti-ironic" images spends a lot of his time seething on Twitter
Lines on paper cannot have an age, but fictional characters sure can
>e-girlcon
>pic unrelated
I said already that I have a preference for older e-girls
Yaoi is yaoi either way. Regardless, not everything has to be a reflection of reality
>traps
I'm talking about MEN who fap to actual bara yaoi with big strong hairy men fricking each other. I'm not talking about traps. Are they not gay?
>jerk offs to men
>lesbians
I always knew lesbians didn't actually exist. All women crave wiener.
> fapping to yaoi makes you gay, prove it doesn’t
> b-but not like that!
You’re just arguing in bad faith.
I literally said it as unambiguously as possible
>If you're a guy who only jerk offs to yaoi drawings and nothing else, you're still a gay
>If you're a guy
all lesbians are straight. They are all misandrists, but women are primordial creatures that live off instinct. Women aren't capable of romantic or sexual interest in women, mostly just admiration.
>Can't we just agree that the most certain way to identify a e-girlcon as a pedophile is through psychiatric evaluation?
No. Pedophile and pedophilic disorder are not the same thing. You don't need to be diagnosed to be a pedo. Same as you wouldn't need to be diagnosed to be straight, gay, or bi. I have never gone to a psychiatrist and I consider myself a pedophile.
All e-girlcons are pedophiles since they mean the exact same thing in Japan. Everything else is western cope.
>e-girlcon
>posts normalgay petite woman garbage what did he mean by this
Reminder that fictional characters are objects, so it's fine to objectify them. And if someone treats women differently based on made up fantasy depictions of them, then they probably have mental issues that already existed before they played Senran Kagura.
Why does everyone talk about how "unrealistic" these women look, and ignore the fact that they're almost always portrayed as being as physically strong as men, as capable as men, as essentially being men in all but appearance. It gives men and women unrealistic expectations when reality doesn't work the same way.
It's just misandry. They hate men, and don't want them to express their sexual desires through art. It was never about the characters being unrealistic. That was always an excuse to seethe over sexualized depictions of women, and to desperately try to find something harmful about it to justify the emotionally-driven conclusion they started with.
What does Katsuragi smell like
sauce?
>people are actually arguing over who is and isn't a "real" e-girlcon
What the frick? You guys will really argue over anything.
Tale as old as time newbie
I've been here longer than some of you have been alive.
Then you'd now old gay e-girlcons have always recognized that heavily stylized and unrealistic fictional cartoons have nothing to do with "pedophilia"
Frick off
Nah, you frick off and eat shit mate. The e-girlcon =! pedo argument had always been around, but this "ironic e-girlcon" crap is relatively new.
The vast majority of e-girlcons in the past were proud pedos, or at least there weren't any "e-girls are actually petite wahmen" copers.
>e-girlcon =! pedo argument
Except they're literally synonyms
How do you respond, ironicsisters?
>edited caption
Blackmailed Nii-chan | DireWolf https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/96621018
"Pedophile" can be hot in the same way DDLG can, it's the taboo and power dynamic that's arousing, not the word itself
Just admit you find it hot when an LG calls you a pedo. Nobody will shame you here.
It's hot when a e-girl does it because it's taboo but it's completely fictional roleplay
Project harder nonce
Whatever helps you cope, I guess.
>these are the people calling you ironic e-girlcon
Imagine being such a non-pedo that you have to argue you're not a pedo on the internet every day.
Isn't that the whole point of all those twitter screencaps?
On an anonymous imageboard of all places
Seems more like self reassurance to me
All this crying over sexualization of girls, but what about sexualization of boys?
Been playing lewd games for decades.
Loik real women
Loik pretty anime lasses
Love me woif
‘Ate trannies
Simple as
Why did you spend an entire 500 posts talking with a bot that does not understand what a Venn diagram is?
>ironic pedo
Frick Black folk
Frick israelites
Frick trannies
Frick jannies
Frick homosexuals
Frick ironic pedos
So the regular pedos are cool?
Reported.
for?
Violating U.S. law.
Which law does that .gif violate?
It's considered CSEM when you add captions like that
Disgusting and abhorrent, I fricking hate pedos so fricking much
>It's considered CSEM when you add captions like that
Source?
You do realise announcing a report is bannable, right?
You are not getting any upvotes.
Of course.
Reminder that Thad was right: little girls NEED wiener.
Reminder that e-girls love big pedo wieners.
Yes but only if it's fictional roleplay like DDLG
Nah, it's the same in real life too.
Then fricking have a nice day in the head before you offend
dickybros want nothing to do with your ilk
Literally any man would have sex with a young girl if they knew for sure they could get away with it.
Cope, ironic e-girlcon.
Dude I've been around little kids, I would not do. They're just too stupid.
Oh no the meany words, I've been distributing cp this whole time? I'll turn myself in.
Yeah kids are so stupid and ugly haha! You should stay in your basement and fap to cartoons in a dark room, I'll totally do the same and definitely not just keep all the dicky for myself
You go ahead and do that. Since when did 3DPD stop applying to e-girl?
>Since when did 3DPD stop applying to e-girl?
It never applied to e-girls. It only applies to hags. Even then, it's only taken seriously by complete fricking idiots.
go back
>Sexualization is harmless
This kills the feminist
Why is Ganker the only board that get so worked up over e-girls?
Everywhere else on this site loves it.
videogames are a generic and popular hobby, meaning Ganker is a shithole filled with tourists. also explains the ridiculous amount of off topic threads.
I just remembered this, and it's likely one of the morons arguing right now
He's right. Ironic e-girlcons can be Japanese too. They're just much less common in Japan. Jap e-girlcons are often proud pedos.
>Japanese men who aren't proud pedos aren't real e-girlcons
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
That isn't what he said at all.
Just that plenty are pedos who are also e-girlcons
~550 posts, 0 changed opinions