well, you see, type A's might get aroused from seeing a cleavage.
why is that a problem you ask? well, you see, type B's are getting mad as frick when type A's look at a picture of another type B instead of them. the solution is to reduce sexual identification of virtual type B's, so that type A's look more at actual type B's again.
why does anyone care about screeching type B's? well, that's a whole other mystery that waits to be solved. maybe you will discover it one day.
no, it's simply that type B's feel threatened by virtual type B's and feel the need to remove secondary sexual characteristics from virtual type B's.
I think the most fascinating thing about this ordeal is how pointing out type B's insecurity leads to type A's+B's attacking other type A's+B's over the change.
since when is a cleavage too sexual for kids?
are you one of these degenerates that jerks it to sonic?
i jerked off to this when i was a teenager and it looks like shit compared to the curves in the OP
you guys are just gay
2 years ago
Anonymous
thank you for confirming that you are actually a degenerate. now explain everyone why you should be making rules on how to protect children.
2 years ago
Anonymous
homie you are a troony trying to poison the minds of young kids with degeneracy
the catholic church should have burned you gays instead of the witches
2 years ago
Anonymous
oh, so you are an actual sandBlack person who gets aroused at the tiniest display of skin, could have made that clear from the start.
only problem here is that your kind are too insane and barbaric to ever watch over children or women. only fitting that a pedo like you tries to invoke a religion known for childrape and sacrifice.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That was 2020. They're different people now. How dare you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nice strawman troony, you will burn in hell for trying to manipulate innocent children into your degeneracy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't care about Sweden. They deserve all the shit they get.
2 years ago
Anonymous
A Russian invasion that would literally save the last Swedes from genocide. lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
the Russians will rape the Swedes too
2 years ago
Anonymous
So we should cut off breasts off of real, live women, because they have cleavage and that is degeneracy?
You are a fricking moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That thing is fully nude with a human females form, way different than lego bricks.
Bruh, I was like 5 and I remember feeling funny watching sailor moon transform on tv. She went all naked and it made me feel weird. I couldn't really explain it, but I really liked that part of the show specifically, even if I thought everything else was boring as frick.
To this day I'm pretty sure that show was explicitly made to turn young, innocent boys like me into heterosexuals.
>Why are you so upset about lego cleavage, you pervert? >BUT WHAT IF THE KIDS SEE THE CLEAVAGE IN THE LEGO GAME EVEN THOUGH IT WAS THERE BEFORE AND CLEAVAGE IS EVERYWHERE
But to answer your question, boys shouldn’t be denied their first pee pee getting hard.
A female has breasts, princess Leia is a female. Why do you want to remove the breasts of a female? There is nothing inherently sexual about breasts, it is recent feminism and an american obsession of being afraid and disgusted of the naked human body that has brought about this mentally ill view to light.
The human body is not inherently sexual, it is precisely your porn addiction that makes you think everything is sexual, projecting and virtue signalling doesn't absolve you.
They also have asses, fingers, toes and more features that Lego figurines don't typically emphasize. Don't be so disingenuous. Why hyper fixate on the breasts specifically without mentioning these other things?
>Only answer is "Why shouldn't it"
Unironically "Muh chillens", Ganker loves that excuse when it comes to things they don't like.
Now watch people ignore this point too
>waste effort and time on something utterly pointless
could've maybe worked on the soulless gmod-tier environment textures instead of erasing cleavage textures
this makes no sense. if its not important then why not change it while making the new model if you want to? if there was outcry about the cleavage from consumers then yes this would be moronic but its a really basic design decision made by the people designing the game. if a dev decided they wanted to get rid of lego's dick bulge in a kid's game who are you to say it's wrong to make the decision? you can not like it but clutching your pearls over the change is moronic.
>Outfit that was only ever added for fanservice gets toned down in a literal children's game >Some fat neckbeard moron can't understand why this would be seen as a reasonable decision to make.
Let me guess, trannies groom kids but this shit is okay because you like it?
gays talking about taking dick up the ass disgusts you but everyone should listen about how hard you get from fanservice?
have a nice day moron.
Boobs exist, they’ll always exist and they are a natural thing. A kid will look at breasts and see nothing, literally, until their the age that those type of things become appealing. It’s much different than trannies telling kids about gender identity and all this other made up shit, kids have free access to the internet for almost 2 decades now and its even worse than anything a kids game could put out. have a nice day you disingenuous piece of shit, genuinely.
So you're basically arguing why nudist pride parades should allow children because dicks and balls and boobs exist.
You're moronic, homosexual.
Unironically can't even see the forest for the trees because you're a moronic masturbation addict.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>So you're basically arguing why nudist pride parades should allow children because dicks and balls and boobs exist.
That is a good argument, I don’t believe that though. I just think it’s stupid how much things from the past are forced to be censored despite how little the parents seem to care, considering every kid has an iPad now. breasts meant nothing to me up until I was like 10 but seeing a grown mans dick and balls is truly horrific.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you're willing to let a child see the clear outline of a man's dick and balls because you want to coom to flat drawn cleavage lines in a lego game you have some growing up to do.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I did not say that, you have a mental illness.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Okay coomer.
[...]
So you pretty much can't prove it and you go with your basic b***h response. Good to know
More like I'm literally running out of characters to type with because so many of you bum blasted porn addicts can't cope with the fact no one gives a shit about you or your moronic fake anti censorship moral grandstanding.
have a nice day.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>gets called a basic b***h >proceeds to write a wall of butthurt
So you're either a b***h or a troon. The plot thiccens
2 years ago
Anonymous
has anyone posted picrel?
no?
well there ya have it :DDD
But gay sex good?
Animals do it too so it must be "Natural" right?
Or is your stance going to suddenly shift into Christcuck morality now that "Natural" is no longer helping you?
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's a lot of strawmaning you got there
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Strawmanning
Why is troony sex bad then if you're not trying to shift to a naturalistic argument?
Enlighten me dumbass, I'm pretty sure you're spewing buzzwords because you realize I just knocked your argument on its ass.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Enlighten me dumbass
Why should I try to argue with someone who's clearly just here to be buttmad because no one wants to touch his pubic gash with a barge pole? I'll be wasting my time, as well as validating your invalid fee-fees.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You ascribe boogeymen because you can't argue your point.
But you and your disingenuous compatriots are arguing that it isn’t important, when it very clearly is given how defensive you get. Why not argue what you fricking mean instead of defaulting to the next line of logic to try to “stay right”?
And no anon, removing cleavage would not affect children that weren’t already noticing boobs in the first place. Barbies and fricking tv shows exist, Moms in cartoons have boobs. Hell, the kids mom’s have boobs.
No seriously, why the frick is it suddenly a problem to have this shit when we had entire generations raised on seeing cleavage that turned out ok? Why is this an immediate problem now? Because it isn’t and the kid doesn’t care so the company is wasting time and resource for stupid brownie points, which deserves to be mocked.
You're posting long winded drivel because you're angry.
You're chasing shadows right now, the anon that replied to you wasn't even me. Stop bringing your gay shit into a discussion that has nothing to do with it
You can't even argue the point and feel the need to point out you're a different guy despite the fact you felt the need to step in for him.
breasts are normal, cutting your dick off isnt you fricking moron.
And letting a child see a grown man's penis is normal?
2 years ago
Anonymous
> You're posting long winded drivel because you're angry.
No, I asked a few questions that you can’t seem to answer and pointed out that you immediately got defensive when anon called out your weak “it’s not important” defense.
Don’t get pissy just because people are poking holes in your dumb ideology. Argue your point.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And I didn't bother reading beyond the first sentence because you're unable to be concise, maybe you should argue your point first and virtue signal to porn addicted morons at the end of your dogshit post, homosexual.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> And I didn't bother reading beyond the first sentence
Yes you did, and now you are using that as an excuse to not argue your points because you have none. Either that, or you are a twittertard that associates 4 sentences as being “cringe” and are therefore not worth much.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bro you're literally competing for my time with 4 other people, you realize that right? I'm the commodity here, the fact you keep replying proves you desperately want to interact with me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, it proves that you are very desperately trying to not argue my points because you have no argument. You’re now trying to shift the topic. I won’t let you.
Answer why you and others say it’s not important, then get mad when people point out that it wouldn’t be changed if it wasn’t important.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>make a post 5 lines long >wtf someone responds to me with more then a sentence? IGNORE
So it’s ok when you do it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I keep my post concise and save namecalling for the end, brevity is the soul of wit.
Seems you're unarmed in this battle of wits, moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I make the rules of conduct here
Me and the rest of the bros in this shitfling disagree, probably
2 years ago
Anonymous
But you didn’t, you wrote 5 sentences and then tried to shame anon because he wrote 8. You are just trying to discredit him while ignoring that you did the same thing
2 years ago
Anonymous
5 sentences is concise but a few sentences more isn’t? Also where is this arbitrary number game coming from?
This is the problem, you gays from twitter want everything to be black and white when everything is shades of grey. You have to go into detail you homosexual, otherwise you end up with current politics of “red/blue team good/bad” without any sort of examination of the nuance.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I am the commodity here and you're not.
Either make your point in non lefty meme format or don't post, moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You aren’t the “commodity”, you are just trying to make up excuses on why you won’t argue the point on shit because you know you’re wrong. Multiple people have pointed this out and you keep making shit up to avoid that. I am currently rubbing your nose in it.
Stop running or concede.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Maybe multiple people calling you moronic should suggest to you that you aren’t in the right. You know, instead of arguing semantics on Ganker post procedure. Really, that’s the most damning thing anon, if you had actual arguments you’d argue with them instead of trying to dictate how long someone’s post should be.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Maybe multiple people calling you moronic should suggest to you that you aren’t in the right.
Funny when this argument is used in social media for "Likes" and shit you friendless homosexuals lose your mind.
Is it different now because 4 other morons agree with you?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because a “like” isn’t 5 people giving you well thought out arguments, it’s a symbol of general agreement that means nothing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>cries about boogeymen since the beginning >accuses someone else of the same >thinks it's a valid argument since he can't realize how hard he's projecting
Bro... lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Display you're addicted to porn >Get called a porn addict >Call the person a troony in return >"I-I just did what you did"
This is fricking pathetic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You never called me a porn addict though. You realize you're talking to multiple people, right? Or are you too angry to realize that? Do feel free to keep seething though. Seeing people being buttmad about legos is oddly schadenfreudish
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes, multiple people are competing for my time including you.
You feel the need to defend them but shy away from all their talking points and grievances because you realize I trash canned them and will trash can you in the same way.
Be a little more interesting please, this reddit arguing where you skirt around everything and get mad while not saying anything is really fricking gay.
No, it proves that you are very desperately trying to not argue my points because you have no argument. You’re now trying to shift the topic. I won’t let you.
Answer why you and others say it’s not important, then get mad when people point out that it wouldn’t be changed if it wasn’t important.
You realize it's literally just a flat png texture right? I'm guessing you know nothing about texture work because you seem to believe it takes a lot of work to remove something so simple.
>I make the rules of conduct here
Me and the rest of the bros in this shitfling disagree, probably
More like I only have to respond to what tickles my fancy, you're still responding.
But you didn’t, you wrote 5 sentences and then tried to shame anon because he wrote 8. You are just trying to discredit him while ignoring that you did the same thing
*yawn* getting bored again
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You feel the need to defend them but shy away from all their talking points and grievances because you realize I trash canned them and will trash can you in the same way.
What the hell are you even talking about lmao? I feel the need to make fun of and giggle my ass off at a buttmad moron who needs to take a chill pill and go touch grass >Be a little more interesting please, this reddit arguing where you skirt around everything and get mad while not saying anything is really fricking gay.
That's what an actual clown would say
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's funny you were pretending this was an argument a moment ago but when I pointed out you're doing that passive aggressive thing where people refuse to talk about what they're mad at but they're argumentative suddenly you're trolling.
> You realize it's literally just a flat png texture right? I'm guessing you know nothing about texture work because you seem to believe it takes a lot of work to remove something so simple.
And it takes even less work to not edit it at all, so why would you change it and literally waste money and time doing that if it isn’t important?
Anon I could shoop a big dick into a screencap of your post on about 10 seconds, it still takes work to do so
There's no reason to care about the inclusion of such things in a children's game.
You're arguing for why they should be lazy instead of why they should be in the game.
>More like I only have to respond to what tickles my fancy, you're still responding.
Yes. I do enjoy pushing someone's buttons without even trying
You're punching your own argument, moron.
I'm dumpstering you and your friends in front of everyone.
You aren’t the “commodity”, you are just trying to make up excuses on why you won’t argue the point on shit because you know you’re wrong. Multiple people have pointed this out and you keep making shit up to avoid that. I am currently rubbing your nose in it.
Stop running or concede.
You're complaining about your argument and you have YET to state it, your posts always start with some moral grandstanding because you can't merely state your point.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> There's no reason to care about the inclusion of such things in a children's game.
There is no reason to care about them excluding such things too by that logic, yet here you are arguing about 5 people defending it while also trying to say it isn’t important, even though removing something like this would cost money to the company.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>There is no reason to care about them excluding such things too by that logic
Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
"B-b-but cleavage isn't sexu-"
Go ahead and say it buddy, admit you're a moron.
What argument ? This is the second thing I wrote [...]
Keep up son. You're clearly snowballing in your own bullshit
"U a twanny"
Compelling dude, Clearly your wanted a scrap of my attention because your recognized that your kind was walking among you.
Because a “like” isn’t 5 people giving you well thought out arguments, it’s a symbol of general agreement that means nothing.
Calling someone a troony or crying you can't jerk off isn't a well thought out argument you dumb wienersucker.
> You're complaining about your argument and you have YET to state it,
It’s been stated multiple times and you keep ignoring it, grandstanding like your a “commodity” and inflating your ego
Oops didn't state it again!
And what ego? You're responding to me b***h.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>oh noes he said the bad wod
Would calling you a massive homosexual make your boo-boo feel better?
2 years ago
Anonymous
> Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
And yet it had this and more when I was a child and my generation ended up just fine, funny that. Also women themselves argue that boobs aren’t sexual and that they should breast feed in public and such, yet none of them ever do. Almost like men would be fine with it and they themselves are perpetuating that it’s secual
2 years ago
Anonymous
> Calling someone a troony or crying you can't jerk off isn't a well thought out argument you dumb wienersucker.
Never did that though
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
Why is Slave Leia being sexualized in the movie ok then?
2 years ago
Anonymous
wasn't the point of Leia getting slaved was Jabba being a frickhead and underestimating Leia so he gave her the very means to kill him via the chain.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm amazed to see you are trying desperately to not take the L and get the last word on this argument of the necessity to edit the lego tiddies out since they weren't important to begin with.
Literal redditor behavior from A to Z.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> And what ego? You're responding to me b***h.
You’re trying to act like you’re too important to read points against you, yes you are inflating your ego
2 years ago
Anonymous
> there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head and that’s fine?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why is fictional violence okay but porn not okay
You ever wonder why kids can't look at actual porn despite the fact they're not the once fricking the women in them?
Do you ever think that the act of defeating an enemy is what compels a gamer and not specifically "Shooting" them?
Moron.
[...] >out of arguments and now it's time for passive-aggressive "ironic" posting like any redditor does
Pottery.
Better than skirting around the argument and pretending to be a troll like you.
[...] >*yawn*
Is anyone else noticing the typical troon pattern in these responses or is it just me? Are we getting raided again?
>t-twanny
Funny how mad you get when you eat your own shit
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cleavage isn’t porn. Your mother has cleavage. Any woman that isn’t absolutely flat has cleavage.
Why are you trying to equate fictionally cleavage to real life porn, or someone shooting someone in the head?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Every man also has a dick and balls, you're not making a point, you're just repeating the same shit because you realize you have no argument
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Every man also has a dick and balls
In what country do you live where men have their dicks and balls out?
2 years ago
Anonymous
What does that matter? All men have them, women can cover cleavage.
Did you realize you fricked up again?
>mad just because someone called him a hypothetical troon based on writing patterns
Lol
>Get mad fun of >"L-lol u mad"
Takes me back, moron.
one of the first interactions you have with another human isn't sucking on a dick though is it
You seem huttburt.
>At least I'm not hiding behind multiple morons and pretending to be above it all while refusing to provide an argument of worth. >right after being presented arguments from 3 different anons and being assraped on the process, then dismissing everything that couldn't be cherry-picked
DOUBLING DOWN ON "moron ON PURPOSE"
>Le epic laughing image because he got angry
Here we go, more passive aggressive behavior.
Funny how much you pretend to hate twitter and do the same shit when you're furious.
> More like you realized I just shit down your throat, owned.
Uh oh, looks like you projected too hard and now your trying to backpedal. Want me to post my hand and ring anon? Go on, don’t be shy, share with the class on how you are supposedly some superman and we’re all peons, tell us about what you do for a living, how much money you have, how educated you are, what your relationships is, etc. should be easy since you’re so superior to us, right?
Oh, and you still didn’t argue the point. Why is it that a generation raised on Leia’s cleavage was perfectly fine but now it’s a problem? Answer anon.
*yawn*
[...] >You clearly did that to appear like you're a part of this group when you're not.
And how can you prove that?
"we"
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Funny how much you pretend to hate twitter and do the same shit when you're furious. >you're furious. >clearly laughing
shit baitto, tbh.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>yawn
Answer the question, don’t run. You were so confident a minute ago.
2 years ago
Anonymous
he won't, he'll try to turn the conversation in his favor by quoting specific people. see:
[...]
[...]
[...]
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's a long-winded way of saying no u
2 years ago
Anonymous
Every time you say “yawn” you’re just conceding that you have no argument lmao. Why are zoomers so bad at arguing?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Zoomers grew up on the internet and attach their lives to it, so they can’t stand being wrong because to them it’s an affront on their existence. So they get pissy and argue and the minute they lose they do an ebin “dismissal” like “didn’t ask” and other shit in order to protect their fragile egos.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What does that matter? All men have them,
again, in which country do you live where men have their wieners and balls out? I'm genuinely interested >women can cover cleavage.
except when they don't, which is also a pretty normal thing for women. have you ever met a woman before?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>we
"We" what? This is a board. People interact with each other. "We"
2 years ago
Anonymous
one of the first interactions you have with another human isn't sucking on a dick though is it
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don’t remember a point in time where men have their dicks on display in public literally every single fricking day, and I didn’t suck on a dick to get breast milk as a child.
Cleavage is not porn. It is not the same as someone shooting someone in the fricking face.
2 years ago
Anonymous
breasts are chest. wiener, balls, vegana are genitalia.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I mean frick he would have a slight point if nipples were included but frickin g cleavage being equates to porn is full on moronic
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because he wishes he was a woman and has sexually idolised women to the point where real breasts are an impossible-to-acquire beacon of sexiness
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Better than skirting around the argument and pretending to be a troll like you. >pretending to be a troll like you. >did not but try to troll everyone until own-shit snowball
HAHAHA, it's funny feeding your shit attempts at baitto.
2 years ago
Anonymous
At least I'm not hiding behind multiple morons and pretending to be above it all while refusing to provide an argument of worth.
Must feel nice to be able to validate yourself when no one else will do it for you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>At least I'm not hiding behind multiple morons and pretending to be above it all while refusing to provide an argument of worth. >right after being presented arguments from 3 different anons and being assraped on the process, then dismissing everything that couldn't be cherry-picked
DOUBLING DOWN ON "moron ON PURPOSE"
2 years ago
Anonymous
>mad just because someone called him a hypothetical troon based on writing patterns
Lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
What argument ? This is the second thing I wrote
>Enlighten me dumbass
Why should I try to argue with someone who's clearly just here to be buttmad because no one wants to touch his pubic gash with a barge pole? I'll be wasting my time, as well as validating your invalid fee-fees.
Keep up son. You're clearly snowballing in your own bullshit
2 years ago
Anonymous
> You're complaining about your argument and you have YET to state it,
It’s been stated multiple times and you keep ignoring it, grandstanding like your a “commodity” and inflating your ego
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You're punching your own argument, moron.
I'm dumpstering you and your friends in front of everyone. >unironically believes in his own rubbish
No reaction image can describe my level of amusement
2 years ago
Anonymous
>So angry he can't even greentext properly
Yikesaroo dude
2 years ago
Anonymous
>angry
Not really. I'm a phonegay who's amusing himself before he hits the sack. At least be grateful I don't use autocorrect. But do feel free to keep grasping at straws
2 years ago
Anonymous
> You realize it's literally just a flat png texture right? I'm guessing you know nothing about texture work because you seem to believe it takes a lot of work to remove something so simple.
And it takes even less work to not edit it at all, so why would you change it and literally waste money and time doing that if it isn’t important?
Anon I could shoop a big dick into a screencap of your post on about 10 seconds, it still takes work to do so
2 years ago
Anonymous
>More like I only have to respond to what tickles my fancy, you're still responding.
Yes. I do enjoy pushing someone's buttons without even trying
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're chasing shadows right now, the anon that replied to you wasn't even me. Stop bringing your gay shit into a discussion that has nothing to do with it
But you and your disingenuous compatriots are arguing that it isn’t important, when it very clearly is given how defensive you get. Why not argue what you fricking mean instead of defaulting to the next line of logic to try to “stay right”?
And no anon, removing cleavage would not affect children that weren’t already noticing boobs in the first place. Barbies and fricking tv shows exist, Moms in cartoons have boobs. Hell, the kids mom’s have boobs.
No seriously, why the frick is it suddenly a problem to have this shit when we had entire generations raised on seeing cleavage that turned out ok? Why is this an immediate problem now? Because it isn’t and the kid doesn’t care so the company is wasting time and resource for stupid brownie points, which deserves to be mocked.
And further more why is noting a difference in biology bad? Why is having kids kill each other violently in videogames fine but cleavage needs to be censored? You can’t have this both ways.
Because corporations are notorious for inventing "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!!" puritans who gasp, faint, and then regain consciousness and enter a mindset akin to a raging wildebeest and stampede in the billions, causing the entire company to bleed their entire stocks and leave them for dead.
Yes I'm sure they'll miss those millions of sales from third world porn addicts on Ganker they would have gotten for full price sales on Lego Star Wars.
>Deleting a png texture >More than 10 seconds of work on the clock from an intern
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You and I both know that took all of five minutes to change
And? That’s time wasted on shit that doesn’t make money, and that’s money wasted on reprinting this shit that doesn’t make money and changing everything and of course inevitable miscommunications on prints and such. It adds up. It’s this sort of mentality that made people at the top shit themselves at bottom lines a few months down the road.
t. Worked in the toy industry for 5 years
2 years ago
Anonymous
>t. Worked in the toy industry for 5 years
You and I both know that's a lie especially because you double down on deleting a png texture being "Money wasted"
Disingenuous as always
2 years ago
Anonymous
> You and I both know that's a lie especially because you double down on deleting a png texture being "Money wasted"
Kek, anon please describe the printing process.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Printing process has nothing to do with deleting a 10kb line texture.
Keep going.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hm yes anon, and the fact that they likely had massive inventory of the old design that they could have easily repurposed and resold for 100% profit, but instead decided to do an arbitrary “fix” that lead to thousands of reprints for exactly zero monetary gain… yes you’re right, I’m sure they lost no money on this! >inb4 they wouldn’t just reuse inventory like that!
They would and do, constantly. You’d know this if you were in the industry.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Chances are didn’t go out of their way to change an existing print though. They probably started from the ground up for the new set while using the old figure as a reference. Point being they would have done the new work anyways
Because that takes time and effort to change something.
You don’t even need to know much about game design to know change takes time and energy
2 years ago
Anonymous
If it's an insignificant thing somebody feels like doing and everyone else on the project agrees with it I don't see any problem why they shouldn't be allowed to do it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It has been stated multiple times that the mini figure models get updated when new sets are released, and the game just uses the latest designs from the sets
>yes let's make more dicky gays, fur gays, literal gays or autismos in general that want to sexualize inanimate objects
I think the soccer moms were right, you sickos need to learn your place tbqhfam.
It was always the case though. only now anything outside of burka is considered sexual or pornographic
ironic given star wars wasn't really meant for kids
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ironic given star wars wasn't really meant for kids
Grow the frick up
2 years ago
Anonymous
There was also children's merchandising for Alien, Terminator, Robocop, and fricking Rambo.
They weren't meant for kids either, but back when boys had fathers they watched cool shit that wasn't laser targeted at them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The difference is, those became for kids retroactively. Terminator 2, Aliens, Rambo 3, etc., are all decidedly kids movies.
Star Wars from the outset was intended for broad appeal and appealed predominately to children. The only reason people say it wasn't now is because those kids grew up and are ashamed to like kids media or something.
How bad must your life be that you were jerking off to the cleavage of a Lego brick
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
If it's not important, why did they change it in the first place?
Never give trannies an inch. Ever. Not even this fricking lego breasts.
breasts belong in videogames. Trannies don't belong anywhere.
Never let evil take root.
Never surrender.
We will win. By any means necessary.
Die troony.
No that's when you're attracted to everything female including ftm trannies.
The straights is when you just love everything feminine and female. Anon needs to seek treatment or he will lose the natural male attraction to tomboys.
Female audience design is by far the best of these 3.
It’s a more subtle form of beauty that doesn’t feel the need to shove it in your face. The male one is cringy because it looks like what you’d find in a dudebro magazine rather than an actual character design.
>minecraft porn >minecraft porn on youtube in the millions >roblox porn >literal lego porn ala the Lego Movie/TV shows >furries-
Yes I would be afraid of my kid's possible sexual awakenings, in fact I'd rather raise a sheltered serial killer.
>How could you possibly find Legos sexual?
followed with >ITS FOR KIDS WHY DO YOU WANT YOUR KIDS LOOKING AT SOMETHING SO SEXUAL?
Nice doublethink moron
this is how it starts, then they use the same argument to take it all away bit by bit until you are left with nothing creative or challenging, or god forbid arousing. If we dont fight back now, we have already lost.
it's not just censorship, it's stupid censorship >oh no not cleavage lines on a girl in a bra
someone decided "we need to censor this"...in a LEGO GAME.
>coombrain immediately thinks of one thing and one thing only
are you part of some london rape gang? is the threat of seeing a couple lines on a minifig enough to send you into a lust filled frenzy?
>How bad must your life be that you have to censor the printed on cleavage of a SLAVE leia figure.
Most people weren’t jerking off to it in the first place so it’s even weirder that they thought to remove it.
Legos do wonders if you have a giant fetish. >Build lego town >Populate it with lego people posed like they are running in terror >Procede to jack off all over your lego city raining your giant sperm all over the terrified denizens.
woah woah woah
I literally cannot play old lego games because of my raging boner. I'm glad they god rid of this stupid sexy lego cleavage so I can finally enjoy the new game in peace.
imo, it's not a problem that a lego character no longer has cleavage.
the problem is the reason she doesn't. the mental sickness of the people behind the change is the disease ruining everything good. these people can't produce anything of value, they do not value anything that already exists and actively try to ruin it with retcons and just flat out reboots, they are the modern iconoclasts and they need ropes around their throats.
cultural marxists and their semi-religious zealotry to making every single thing political and deconstructing it.
their fanatical, cult-like ideology is a rampant disease that needs to be burned out of society.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>appeasing hardcore conservative evangelists is marxism
The shit you people come up with
2 years ago
Anonymous
when we were growing up it was the conservatives pulling this shit.
now it's these leftist homosexuals with their deconstructionist ideological campaign. the difference is that they actually inserted themselves into the places needed to achieve their censorship, where boomer conservatards just b***hed and whined about it like they do about everything.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the difference is that they actually inserted themselves into the places needed to achieve their censorship
It’s fricking Lego. Where did they insert themselves? Denmark?
Censoring cleavage means you can sell to the puritans and the muslims and the sjws. They’re not after cultural change, they just want money
2 years ago
Anonymous
every technological company, every layer of media, most layers of government.
they are an infestation. a rotting, malignant disease. they aren't even a collective group doing it by someone's order, they are just corrupted with this ideology from the indoctrination to it they have had through the education system.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>THEY’RE EVERYWHERE THEY’RE IN MY WALLS THEY CAN HEAR US RIGHT NOW
2 years ago
Anonymous
yes yes, your kind always pull this reductivist nonsense to attempt to delegitimize anything against you.
you're cretins, and people corrupted with these ideas should have their heads blown off or their necks stretched. the only thing that will heal society of you is your death.
I thought one of the big womens' empowerment arguments these days was the desexualization of the breasts. Why are they using breasts as an analogue for penises when that should, realistically, be the vegana instead?
the fake hips (null space imposed with brown) look moronic alone, I always thought this. It'd be funnier if she just had the bikini top, and I would play these games for fun or laughs as a kid.
Minikits. Basically boxes that have the pieces to build small-scale models of vehicles, dioramas, etc. at the end of the level.
I didn't know what they were either, but starting with LEGO Marvel Super Heroes they were phased out in favor of boxes (which get open at the end-level screen). >t. 100%'ed 15 LEGO games
I legit wouldn't be able to identify the character if it wasn't for the cleavage. I just skimmed the pic without reading and only when I laid eyes on left I realized it was Leia
tbqh im surprised slave leia is even okay in general these days. I thought she'd have been scrubbed from the franchise in every case except the original movie the outfit appeared in by now.
i think it gets the legacy of- >le sexy + empowering
considering she strangles Jabba, plus it's tied to a franchise that has these homosexuals by the leash. The irony is almost poetic, it sort of rhymes.
do women like having boobs? It seems like they wish they could not deal with carrying them around for other people's benefit. This would be like censoring a man by making him shorter
>do women like having boobs?
generally yes but sometimes there is the usual envy where girls with big boobs want smaller ones and those with small boobs want bigger ones
The only people who want this kind of shit are pedos and trannies. The game is literally for children under the age of 12. Highly sexualizing kids prior to puberty is always linked to fricked up mental illnesses later in life.
what are you talking about you moron, my parents shamed me any time they looked at my browser history when i was a teen and it fricked my brain and made me think too much about sex stuff. family exposed me to smoking and drinking tho and it made me abhor it. you need have some exposure otherwise you'll irrationally seek it out because your brain tells you .you're being deprived of it.
>How could you possibly find Legos sexual?
followed with >ITS FOR KIDS WHY DO YOU WANT YOUR KIDS LOOKING AT SOMETHING SO SEXUAL?
Nice doublethink moron
They had some pretty sexy legos in that game. Shame about no CaC or else I would've spent a bunch of time taking screenshots of my own Twi'lek prostitute OC
>sperging and raging over this only makes you look like a sexless virgin.
Good thing I'm doing neither of those then. On a related note, acting like a passive aggressive c**t over legos isn't doing you any favors.
Why do morons act like it's the same game censored, and not a different game completely? >Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy (2006) >Lego Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga (2022)
They had some pretty sexy legos in that game. Shame about no CaC or else I would've spent a bunch of time taking screenshots of my own Twi'lek prostitute OC
Oola got censored too by making her legs duel molded, though it doesn't appear that way in the front. She was in Lego Force Awakens too, where she had her original legs.
Games aren't censored because of ideology, they are censored because of youtubers and streamers who want to put cola ads before their videos and streams.
If you watch video game streams, you're part of the problem.
>trannies: want to be women >also trannies: removes cleavage from women characters in video games so people think that women can be women without boobs
kill and gas all trannies
While I think that complaining about cleavage in a LEGO game is excessive, I do wish that people could complain about the obvious toning down of sexuality in games without being insulted. I don't mind women characters in games being more than eye candy, but I don't feel that censorship like what Sony has been doing with Japanese games is a good thing.
these homosexual studios today must HATE that she's very obviously forced to wear a bikini as part of the plot of the movie, they literally can't ignore it. you just know they want her covered head to toe like a fricking muslim, the absolute irony of modern day liberals
It's really the least of the games problems, the game was awful and not one of the family members I bought it for played it for more than an hour or two where most of them finish every other lego game I've gotten for them.
It's the left image another game? Because if it is that means they literally redesigned a lot of shit, it was not a outrage inside the studio or anything. And even if it's a stupid "change", sperging and raging over this only makes you look like a sexless virgin.
>sperging and raging over this only makes you look like a sexless virgin.
Good thing I'm doing neither of those then. On a related note, acting like a passive aggressive c**t over legos isn't doing you any favors.
don't worry they'll come for your game next, they already have a foothold in japan (see spike chunsoft), australia is in too deep, and europe isn't far them behind
before long games will just be visual novels with no blood, no nudity, and every character will be a mulatto brown or trans to conform with the status quo
Do it, focus on doing stuff you like, play only games you're actively enjoying your time with, watch only the best shows and movies for your preferences and don't give a shit about the misery and bullshit going on and being perpetrated by our stupid species. it's a lot nicer this way. typing that is a nice reminder to gtfo here, it'll never be 2006 again.
>troony sex bad, but straight sex good?
Yes, moron.
But gay sex good?
Animals do it too so it must be "Natural" right?
Or is your stance going to suddenly shift into Christcuck morality now that "Natural" is no longer helping you?
"I'm simply against censorship, you fricking commie!"
"Oh good, there are tons of people being censored on issues that don't involve pornograp-"
"I DON'T CARE GB2/pol/!!!"
You morons should honestly have a nice day.
Just standing behind grandiose moral platforms only to cuck out when it doesn't satisfy your whims.
It's appealing to a broader demographic, dipshit. Women make up more than half of the population in the US so of course they are going to appeal to them. It makes business sense to censor what women don't like so the larger audience will purchase the game.
>skirt looks like shorts >cleavage removed = DFC Leia except >bra looks like male chestplate = gay >face looks like a man's = gay >hair looks like wig =gay
They made Leia a man/troony.
It’s funny how the way shills defend widespread censorship in videogames is almost identical to how trannies defend their mycelium into every facet of media and their predation on children
>X will never happen, stop being so paranoid >Give me one example of X happening >So X happened once, big deal >How is X personally effecting you? >So what if X happens? Why do you care?
You clearly did that to appear like you're a part of this group when you're not.
[...] >Because star wars marketted towards adults and Lego doesn't?
"star wars" "marketed towards adults"
who do you think the game is marketed to, moron? people who watched the movies
>He thinks lego games are marketted towards the 30+ year olds to watched the movies on release.
You're truly fricking moronic.
Lego games are clearly dumbed down shit for kids to get into the series with.
[...] > I like how you had to say "My generation" and not "I" because you realize you're a maladjusted piece of trash arguing for cleavage in a lego game.
Lmao, no I was trying to indicate that it was brainwashing children. As for myself I have a wife and I’d have children if it wasn’t for all the fricked shit going on like baby food shortages. Almost bough a house the other day but I’m trying to wait out the market. How about you anon? You want to tell me how your life is while arguing that cleavage is somehow going to make prepubescent children into degenerates?
More like you realized I just shit down your throat, owned.
> More like you realized I just shit down your throat, owned.
Uh oh, looks like you projected too hard and now your trying to backpedal. Want me to post my hand and ring anon? Go on, don’t be shy, share with the class on how you are supposedly some superman and we’re all peons, tell us about what you do for a living, how much money you have, how educated you are, what your relationships is, etc. should be easy since you’re so superior to us, right?
Oh, and you still didn’t argue the point. Why is it that a generation raised on Leia’s cleavage was perfectly fine but now it’s a problem? Answer anon.
>You're truly fricking moronic. >Lego games are clearly dumbed down shit for kids to get into the series with.
yeah, i'm sure the dozens of thousands of people who bought the game on Steam are little kids
fricking moron
>Because star wars marketted towards adults and Lego doesn't?
"star wars" "marketed towards adults"
who do you think the game is marketed to, moron? people who watched the movies
> I like how you had to say "My generation" and not "I" because you realize you're a maladjusted piece of trash arguing for cleavage in a lego game.
Lmao, no I was trying to indicate that it was brainwashing children. As for myself I have a wife and I’d have children if it wasn’t for all the fricked shit going on like baby food shortages. Almost bough a house the other day but I’m trying to wait out the market. How about you anon? You want to tell me how your life is while arguing that cleavage is somehow going to make prepubescent children into degenerates?
>You're like those people that type smiley faces when they're seething.
you mean /qa/ gays? lol no, i actually laugh at funny shit, which is your silly attempts of manipulating this conversation and having it backfire terribly in the process because it is funny seeing the magic turning against the wizard.
What other demographic besides straight men has their sexuality repressed as much as men? This is a fricking lego. Gay and female hyper idealized sex models are rampant and encouraged, but anything resembling even a small amount of cleavage is heresy.
> So which is it dumbass? Cleavage or the whole breast? Or did you add the beast feeding bit because again, you lost the plot?
We’re talking about cleavage and you are equating it to dicks. Please point out where mean are walking around with their balls teasing out of their shorts every day, and show where that’s prevalent.
If my fricking sack was hanging out of my shorts I’d get arrested for public indecency. Women do not get arrested for fricking showing cleavage in public.
You're fricking weird dude.
You're equating breasts to dicks because you're moronic and gay, you're literally talking about children sucking dicks because you're addicted to porn.
[...] > When I type *yawn* I'm pointing out-
You’re pointing out that you have no argument and you are trying to have an ebin dismissal so that you can get out of arguing against it. Because you know you’re wrong but your fragile ego can’t handle that.
More like I'm literally running out of characters because you're all
"PLEASE RESPOND TO ME" and get upset when I don't respond to people that want to namecall and have no arguments.
[...] >So why is a topless woman considered nudity and a topless man isn't?
Because certain countries deemed it so. It’s not like that all over the world y’know, the government isn’t always right lol.
Dogshit argument, kys.
[...]
Cleavage isn’t porn lmao
Good thing you're not in charge.
>gets called a basic b***h >proceeds to write a wall of butthurt
So you're either a b***h or a troon. The plot thiccens
Okay, moron.
[...] >Awesome argument that can't be taken another way
thanks for admitting that you are objectively wrong about your poor comparison. it takes real courage to admit a mistake like that.
now can we go back to the core of the argument, which is that cleavage is a completely non-offensive thing to rational humans?
Oh he's doing that thing where he pretends my sarcasm was me agreeing with him because he's angry.
>Oh he's doing that thing where he pretends my sarcasm was me agreeing with him because he's angry.
Why are you ignoring the main point of the discussion, which is that cleavage is completely non-offensive to any rational human?
does pic related offend you in any way? could you explain how?
It's not about how it offends me it's about not sexualizing a game for literal children.
Are you learning impaired by any chance?
why are you offended by a woman wearing an outfit from a movie? what exactly is the problem?
>Offended
There's that word again, you're the one assmad about a lego game and comparing real women in shit aimed at adults to shit in a kid's game.
Grow up.
> Good thing you're not in charge
Yea, and you aren’t either, society is. Try taking a poll anywhere and ask if cleavage is porn, get back to me on that lmao
But the people that agree with me are in charge so...
> But the people that agree with me are in charge so...
No, I’m pretty sure society disagrees that cleavage is porn. Again, go make a poll on any site right now and post results lmao
>It's not about how it offends me it's about not sexualizing a game for literal children.
you are extremely offended on behalf of the children, while children couldn't give two fricks about two lines indicating cleavage of a toy. dolls for little girls are more sexualized than the old lego games, are you throwing tantrums because of those too?
how should women be depicted in your opinion? like pic related? are you happy then? >There's that word again, you're the one assmad about a lego game
No, I have never played a Lego game, I'm simply here because I found it interesting how crazy you are going over literally two lines on a Lego figure and claiming this is harmful sexualization that in some way degenerates children without any source to back that up.
>Oh he's doing that thing where he pretends my sarcasm was me agreeing with him because he's angry.
Why are you ignoring the main point of the discussion, which is that cleavage is completely non-offensive to any rational human?
does pic related offend you in any way? could you explain how?
> You're fricking weird dude.
You're equating breasts to dicks
YOU did that by saying cleavage is porn lmfao. It isn’t. If it was pornographic in nature, women would get arrested for it for public indecency. You literally can’t argue it’s porn
>Ganker children so depserate. >STILL no b***hes?
Now I'm convinced it's a woman. Are you that one weird chick with the reverse humiliation fetish that rears its ugly head every now and then just to shlick?
that Black person ignores certain posts that he knows he can't reply without seeing utterly assblasted even if it's some "irony dabbing", what i find funny is the Black person saying "i win" on a basket weaving mongolian forum, does anyone have that picture where a moron could pick from a fricktillion sites, including reddit which is like on the 1st place but picks Ganker which is like on 4000th place or something to go around and post garbage?
> Good thing you're not in charge
Yea, and you aren’t either, society is. Try taking a poll anywhere and ask if cleavage is porn, get back to me on that lmao
> More like I'm literally running out of characters because you're all
"PLEASE RESPOND TO ME" and get upset when I don't respond to people that want to namecall and have no arguments.
I haven’t been namecalling at all and you keep trying to dismiss me and refuse to answer any question I pose.
You’re just wrong anon. And you can’t handle that so you protect your ego with ebin dismissals while praying that we won’t continue rubbing your nose in it. I bet you keep glancing nervously at the post count because you want the thread to be over.
You keep going on about ego but you're desperate for my attention?
> But the people that agree with me are in charge so...
No, I’m pretty sure society disagrees that cleavage is porn. Again, go make a poll on any site right now and post results lmao
Doesn't matter what society thinks, besides, you're clearly framing the argument in a certain way
Why don't we ask if we should change the slave costume in a kid's show version of star wars and see how many people suddenly would think you're a moron.
>It's not about how it offends me it's about not sexualizing a game for literal children.
you are extremely offended on behalf of the children, while children couldn't give two fricks about two lines indicating cleavage of a toy. dolls for little girls are more sexualized than the old lego games, are you throwing tantrums because of those too?
how should women be depicted in your opinion? like pic related? are you happy then? >There's that word again, you're the one assmad about a lego game
No, I have never played a Lego game, I'm simply here because I found it interesting how crazy you are going over literally two lines on a Lego figure and claiming this is harmful sexualization that in some way degenerates children without any source to back that up.
>Keeps talking about being offended >Posts picture of a burqa
Good way to ensure I don't read your porn obsessed drivel.
You're not edgy for jerking off dumbass.
>Good way to ensure I don't read your porn obsessed drivel.
Why are you ignoring the entire post? Why are you offended by 2 lines on a Lego figurine? Why do you claim this is harming children?
>"society agrees with me" >no it doesn't >"doesn't matter what society thinks"
that'll be one (you) please
>Can't win the argument >Reductio ad absurdum
Another win in my pocket.
You morons are giving out Ws like candy.
> Doesn't matter what society thinks
So in other words you know you are wrong about your claim that cleavage is porn but won’t admit to that. And no, society is the only thing that matters, your self righteous crusade does not matter.
Didn't ask and you're reaching.
Another W
2 years ago
Anonymous
> Didn't ask and you're reaching. Another W
You admitted you were wrong indirectly and now you’re spinning it as a win lmfao. You are objectively wrong that cleavage is porn and you just admitted that your delusions goes against societal opinion.
You lost kid.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's funny where you ignored the part about what people would say about the slave costume in a kid's show.
>Why touch cleavage? It exists IRL
Yeah, why is it offensive to you to a point were you go crazy for over an hour in a thread about it? It must really touch a nerve, and I'm simply interested why.
Is pic related driving you insane too? It's a doll for kids, do you get horny from looking at it?
I like how you also ignored the gay kisses.
Bad cuz mad.
Mad cuz bad.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I like how you also ignored the gay kisses.
Are you implying that I don't like gay kisses, and that means that you are allowed to lie about cleavage being porn and harming children?
If so, what if I don't give a frick about gay kisses? Would that mean you rethink your position on cleavage and accepting it as a completely normal thing?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're spending more time saving images of barbie dolls than actually forming a coherent argument, dumbass.
If you had a point it wouldn't take more than a few words to explain.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I ask you once again: why are you so offended by cleavage that you start lying about it harming children? Why are you offended by two lines on a plastic toy to a point where you go crazy over hours in a Ganker thread?
Also, why do you keep dodging these questions? What makes you so afraid to answer them?
2 years ago
Anonymous
No one's lying about anything moron, you're clearly too stupid to understand how the entertainment industry works when it comes to children or the regulations surrounding it
2 years ago
Anonymous
If breasts are so bad, why aren't we requiring that women need to have breast reduction surgery until they're flat as a board?
What if a kid sees their rack and gets perverted, sinful ideas?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>No one's lying about anything moron
Post source please on how cleavage affects children's development. I'm genuinely interested to learn more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cleavage means breasts.
breasts means milkies.
Milkies means children have source of nourishment in early childhood.
Source of nourishment in early childhood means growth.
Growth is good.
That means cleavage is good.
Source: trust me bro
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What makes you so afraid to answer them?
being out of arguments and admitting to being wrong.
classic redditor move.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> That's funny where you ignored the part about what people would say about the slave costume in a kid's show.
Removing cleavage doesn’t make it not a slave outfit lmfao, infact that’s even more damning to your point
2 years ago
Anonymous
Changing the costume takes more effort for a game, idiot.
It's like you're too stupid to even understand what I'm saying and you're trying as hard as you can to split hairs because your porn addiction has consumed you.
put me in your homosexual discord raid screencap.
I've literally been like 1 of like 2-3 people arguing this, if anything you coomers are clearly talking to each other offsite because you say the same exact shit when you get angry
"WHY ARE YOU OFFENDED"
"PURITAN"
"MORAL PURITAN!!"
"PRUDE"
You homosexuals say the same shit
2 years ago
Anonymous
> Changing the costume takes more effort for a game, idiot.
Ok, then if they changed the cleavage to “save the children” then why not the slave outfit? Hm? You can’t have this both ways anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why didn't they model a different outfit entirely
I know for a fact you are the same guy b***hing about wasted effort for png deletions too, but since I can't see IPs on posts you're squirm out of it, a shame.
If breasts are so bad, why aren't we requiring that women need to have breast reduction surgery until they're flat as a board?
What if a kid sees their rack and gets perverted, sinful ideas?
Here it is again "Le christian waaaaaaah muh porn"
>No one's lying about anything moron
Post source please on how cleavage affects children's development. I'm genuinely interested to learn more.
>Seeing breasts means it should be in children focused media
More porn addiction.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>More porn addiction.
Let's calm down here a bit. Are you addicted to porn because you saw Star Wars as a kid? Or are you addicted to porn because you saw a Lego figurine with cleavage? Just to clarify, mate.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Specifically looked up "Sexy leia costume" >Is asshurt when people bring up his affliction
2 years ago
Anonymous
no, I just googled slave leia custome. is this the reason you are so mad about cleavage on children's toys? you got addicted to porn through it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>anon gets addicted to porn via sexy toys >doesn’t want others to end up like him >this is a bad thing
???
2 years ago
Anonymous
>anon gets addicted to porn via sexy toys
that's what I want to know. did he play with dolls as a kid and start to jerk off to them?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm addicted to porn because I got in a fender bender and after exchanging insurance info asked the girl on a date and fricked her.
It was like a porno and it made me realize I could live life like a porno in the real if I wanted.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're the one insinuating that breasts have no place in a child's life.
Explain why real life breasts that countless children will see every day in their life are okay.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Children don't see breasts every day.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If they have a mother, which is typically the case even in a single-parent life, they absolutely goddamn do.
Sure, they're clothed, but they're still there. Noticeable lumps on the female body that are absent from the male body.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I have a mother, I haven't seen her breasts once outside of breastfeeding, and I don't have conscious memory of that.
What type of household were you in? It sounds like you were sexually abused.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you have no concept of object permanence? Even if they're clothed, THE BREASTS ARE STILL THERE.
THEY'RE LUMPS THAT STICK OUT AND ADD A NOTABLE SHAPE TO THE FEMALE BODY EVEN WHEN CLOTHED THAT IS NOT THERE ON THE MALE BODY.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You were 100% abused by a relative. I don't want to hear your cope any further, normal minds don't think about their relatives sexually.
Frick off gay pedophile.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You STILL haven't answered the question of why real life breasts that "aren't sexual" are okay, but fictional breasts that ALSO "aren't sexual" are not.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Look dude, I told you I am not going to be putting up with your molested reasoning any longer. I don't care that you were molested, I don't care that you normalized and internalized it.
I do care that you are choosing to continue the cycle of abuse by voicing your acceptance of what happened to you. You're mindbroken and I'm not going to reason with someone that got put in a position to be sexually abused by a relative and decided they liked it.
Do not reply to me. You repulse me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Answer the question and stop projecting.
Tick tock, we're about to fall right off into pruning.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Do not reply to me
2 years ago
Anonymous
>reply
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ohhhhhhhh...
Hustbant...
Prease...
You spend so many time shitpost we on page 10...
2 years ago
Anonymous
frickin lol
Farewell coomers and that one anon who said cleavage was porn
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Ctrl+f "Cleavage is porn"
You're the first result
Hmm
Strange you magically ignored this
Actually not strange, you're clearly angry as frick and doing it on purpose for a "Win"
2 years ago
Anonymous
See
KEK
[...] >Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head
Then you respond:
[...] >Why is fictional violence ok but porn is bad
Go on anon, what the FRICK did you mean by this? What were you implying, you disingenuous little shit?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You keep calling everyone a gay pedophile but you’re the one who doesn’t want to see breasts and apparently never got an erection as a kid.
Really makes you think.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> I've literally been like 1 of like 2-3 people arguing this,
Like 6 people have been shitting on you. You don’t have to be a coomer to note that it’s pointless censorship, you seem to be the one mad about it and think that cleavage is porn somehow
2 years ago
Anonymous
>The 6 people arguing the same shit, throwing the same baseless insults and making the same faulty arguments aren't the discord raiders.
Man coomers are fricking delusional.
Honestly if all you gays killed yourselves it'd be a net positive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
More like 6 people kept telling you your moronic and not letting you brush it off so you pretended to ebinly own them with gay little dismissals because your fragile ego can’t handle being wrong.
Anon, you said cleavage was porn. I forced you over many posts to admit that society disagrees with you and you screamed that society doesn’t matter. Serious question, when’s the last time you admitted you were wrong on anything? Do you think you are always right?
But don’t worry Anon, we’re almost done bullying you, the thread is about to autosage.
2 years ago
Anonymous
6 stupid people agreeing with each other does not make them correct.
You have yet to include a single reason for why they need to add sexualized shit to a children's game other than "It's natuwal" and when the idea of gay shit is brought up you suddenly shift around and start talking about breasts and sucking dicks being the same thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
6 people are a lot better compared to a single narcissist. Just saying
2 years ago
Anonymous
Like I said before, if this was facebook or some gay shit you 6 homosexuals would be shitting your pants when you got ratio'd.
Silent majority is with me, that's why we win, that's why we control everything.
Shit on pussy.
>I know you'll be seething about me for months.
lol
>I know you'll be seething about me for months.
Especially triggered because you know I'm right.
The argument is why change a png when nothing is wrong with it. You keep equating cleavage to porn, I point out that it’s not something like dicks or veganas which would be actual porn, then you deflect.
Cleavage isn’t porn. You are wrong. Society says you’re wrong.
Because deleting a png is 5 seconds worth of work and conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
Stop talking about shit you don't know anything about.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Especially triggered because you know I'm right.
lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bro, I'll chalk this up to the mind altering medications you're on and we can move past this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ratio'd
Twitter troony confirmed
have a nice day
2 years ago
Anonymous
>if this was facebook or some gay shit
MY FACEBOOK POST GOT DELETED
LITERALLY
1984
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
2 years ago
Anonymous
> Because deleting a png is 5 seconds worth of work and conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
And why did you not say this instead of going on some massive tirade about how cleavage was porn and they’re saving duh chillens?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bitchmade liddle babby
2 years ago
Anonymous
>silent majority is with me >we control everything >implying
Unironically you and what army? All I see is a single sperg throwing a tantrum about people questioning the removal lego cleavage
2 years ago
Anonymous
>conforms to the ratings board
Wasn't LEGO always E rated, even when it had cleavage?
2 years ago
Anonymous
> conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
I really don’t think cleavage would make the game not E10
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Silent majority is with me, that's why we win
oh, you are a leftoid on a crusade to protect the children, that explains a lot lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nick Bates
Thaddeus McMicheal
Vaush.
You're a porn addicted pedo just like them
That image is only ever used by people that need to point fingers when they're rightfully accused of wanting to frick children
2 years ago
Anonymous
sorry pedo, the gig is up. it's a well-known fact that hardcore pedophile will rally for all sorts of pretend causes like censoring cleavage from toys to make them look less guilty.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I-if this was facebook everyone would agree with me!
Maybe you should've stayed there.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The argument is why change a png when nothing is wrong with it. You keep equating cleavage to porn, I point out that it’s not something like dicks or veganas which would be actual porn, then you deflect.
Cleavage isn’t porn. You are wrong. Society says you’re wrong.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that was fricking glorious anon, i'm sure the homosexual and his friends will try that shit tomorrow as well.
they hate Ganker so much they always keep coming back for no reason rather than just forgetting about it and going on with their lives, i simply cannot understand such homosexualry, then again i'm not a gay so...
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Like 6 people have been shitting on you.
I can easily tell you it's two people shitting on the homosexual, the others are simply reinforcing their argument as to why it's a necessary change even though the homosexual started by saying it was removing something unnecessary in the first place and calling people coomers. now he's doubling down on calling people coomers because he can't argue even though one of the anons is reiterating the fact that the change was still useless and that this Black person is pretending to take it too personally to count "wins" by getting (you)s:
I ask you once again: why are you so offended by cleavage that you start lying about it harming children? Why are you offended by two lines on a plastic toy to a point where you go crazy over hours in a Ganker thread?
Also, why do you keep dodging these questions? What makes you so afraid to answer them?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I can easily tell you it's two people shitting on the homosexual
"N-no it's only 2 people, those 10+ reply posts are all 2 people"
How are you homosexuals so aggressive and so ready to play the victim at the same time?
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's two really, me and me using chrome browser.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why touch cleavage? It exists IRL
Yeah, why is it offensive to you to a point were you go crazy for over an hour in a thread about it? It must really touch a nerve, and I'm simply interested why.
Is pic related driving you insane too? It's a doll for kids, do you get horny from looking at it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
lmao that's not even reductio ad absurdum you fricking moronio
> Doesn't matter what society thinks
So in other words you know you are wrong about your claim that cleavage is porn but won’t admit to that. And no, society is the only thing that matters, your self righteous crusade does not matter.
> When I type *yawn* I'm pointing out-
You’re pointing out that you have no argument and you are trying to have an ebin dismissal so that you can get out of arguing against it. Because you know you’re wrong but your fragile ego can’t handle that.
everyone knows that bro, it's just funny seeing the homosexual trying to dance around it, good thread thanks to the homosexual moron tripping over his own shit.
>So why is a topless woman considered nudity and a topless man isn't?
Because certain countries deemed it so. It’s not like that all over the world y’know, the government isn’t always right lol.
>Awesome argument that can't be taken another way
thanks for admitting that you are objectively wrong about your poor comparison. it takes real courage to admit a mistake like that.
now can we go back to the core of the argument, which is that cleavage is a completely non-offensive thing to rational humans?
>first they came for the anime games, and I did not care because I don't play anime games >then they came for the lego games, and I did not care because I don't play lego games
etc. etc. etc.
Is it me or do the people who seethe about the removal of cleavage in a children's game more often than not the same people who seethe about a 0.5 second same-sex kiss in Lightyear?
The people who seethe at the removal of cleavage from a kid’s toy are the same people who argue against said removal because “who cares about the kids, the kids don’t care”, all while being the living result of the decades-old mistake some LEGO designer made when making a Star Wars set (read: degenerate coomer)
this whole talk seems to be more about censorship than it being about coomer shit, one anon even brought up the fact hat "if it was useless, why change it?" prompting "gotcha" wording by raiding leftygays as to why it was changed in the first place, there is one leftyhomosexual tripping over his own shit in this very thread and he gets assmad about it every time other anons point it out, i won't multiquote him because that's moronic shit but have one of his posts:
[...]
people just reinforced the same points over and over until he called people inflexible and "out of arguments" when in true it's him that cannot argue in favor of a "useless change" without offending the others or implying there will be coomer shit on it.
plus someone already mentioned leftyBlack person's intellectual dishonesty and how they will try to manipulate the conversation around:
[...]
[...]
[...]
which the assblasted homosexual is still trying to do by the by.
Why change it if it isn’t important? >the kids-
My entire generation had toys of Leia’s cleavage and saw it in the movies and they aren’t degenerate freak shows. Again, why change it?
>Why change it if it isn't important?
I don't know, I don't care, this is like the peak non-issue for you gays to start screeching censorship about. >First they came for our Lego slave leia, and I did nothing for I was blasting rope to Clone Wars Padme instead.
Is your life so easy that you need to invent this hardship? 2NNNA
Anon is simply asking questions and you gays keep getting mad about it. Of course nobody here cares about Lego breasts, but to pretend censorship isn’t censorship or that it’s “not important” is a dangerous mindset. It’s clearly important if they changed it and the fact that you gays get so mad about this simple observation speaks volumes.
>guy who modeled
Just doing his job >guy who requested the change
Just wants a “safer” product to sell more >guy who complains
Schizo who thinks the entire world is after him and any change in something he’s used to is an attempt on his life and culture
>you
A homosexual leftypolite who thinks anything even attractive is porn and does his best (and fails) to moralgay in a desparate attempt to get anyone with more than a single braincell to agree with him, and he deserves to be beaten and left in a ditch
funny because he had to call for friends on his discord server to agree with him.
Like I said before, if this was facebook or some gay shit you 6 homosexuals would be shitting your pants when you got ratio'd.
Silent majority is with me, that's why we win, that's why we control everything.
Shit on pussy.
[...]
[...]
Especially triggered because you know I'm right.
[...]
Because deleting a png is 5 seconds worth of work and conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
Stop talking about shit you don't know anything about.
Yeah see you’re the schizo. Assuming I’m a leftist, thinking I deserve to be put down, etc. Take your meds friend. LEGO Brand just wants more money with less potential controversy
>never denied my arguement and resorts to "lol ur schizo tho"
See,it can go both ways That your only arguement? We're all schizos here, and you're no different
IS THAT A PAIR OF breasts!?! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS IS LITERAL PORNOGRAPHY AND NOT AT ALL FROM A PG RATED MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>half the thread supports pic related
Purchase a subscription to World of Warcraft today! We protect the morals of our young minds! Nothing but good wholesome delicious fun!
Aren't you the one that shifted the argument to that goalpost moron?
Oh of course, that's why your brought up your own point again.
I know you'll be seething about me for months.
Uh, no? You were the one that claimed that they should remove the cleavage because it was porn and I just keep telling you it’s not, to the point that you claimed that everyone that disagrees with you (the vast majority) “doesn’t matter”.
he's still trying it, good thread because he's still on copium trying too hard to say it's coomer shit and failing terribly.
funny seeing how he got tired of his "cult" facade and just embraced the "haha i win by being moronic on purpose" act.
it's like the Black person's brain literally melt down the more and more he tried to prove he wasn't wrong, i'm glad anon literally pointed it out:
6 stupid people agreeing with each other does not make them correct.
You have yet to include a single reason for why they need to add sexualized shit to a children's game other than "It's natuwal" and when the idea of gay shit is brought up you suddenly shift around and start talking about breasts and sucking dicks being the same thing.
[...]
You’re posting long winded drivel because you’re angry.
My posts are concise, you're copying me because I'm the most successful man in the room
[...] >You're still craving my attention.
Can't wait to see you seethe in the next coomer cope thread.
[...] > I did, you complete fricking moron, you were too busy looking up leia porn and barbie dolls to fricking read.
No, you said because cleavage was porn lmao
No, you drew that conclusion because you're a fricking moron and you keep saying it (Like dunkey's wife) because you're angry you couldn't win on a single point against me.
> there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head and that’s fine?
>Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head
Then you respond:
>Why is fictional violence okay but porn not okay
You ever wonder why kids can't look at actual porn despite the fact they're not the once fricking the women in them?
Do you ever think that the act of defeating an enemy is what compels a gamer and not specifically "Shooting" them?
Moron.
[...]
Better than skirting around the argument and pretending to be a troll like you.
[...] >t-twanny
Funny how mad you get when you eat your own shit
>Why is fictional violence ok but porn is bad
Go on anon, what the FRICK did you mean by this? What were you implying, you disingenuous little shit?
> I did, you complete fricking moron, you were too busy looking up leia porn and barbie dolls to fricking read.
No, you said because cleavage was porn lmao
>You're still craving my attention
Says the moron replying to everyone who even dares question your shit opinions
Go back, it'll be better for you this way
> Varying factors due to the whole outfit, read above
But then why didn’t they change the entire outfit then? You said they were too lazy to do this but now you’re claiming they removed cleavage for a rating? You can’t have this both ways. If they were doing it for a rating than why wouldn’t they change everything?
what makes a Black person go into a braid-making siri-lankan forum just to get other people's attention by being a moron and dodging questions while insulting others?
I can hear you fat morons hyperventilating. >"O-other fat morons agree with me! I must be right"
I've already won on this issue, I'm merely trying to educate you but you're so far gone you make up your own arguments and goalposts based on the twisted interpretation of things I posted.
TL;DR
Coomers got absolutely raped and desperately want the last word, they can have it.
Cope with the fact I'm stronger and smarter than all of you.
Cope that you wanted this so bad you raged until bump limit.
Cope that you'll never feel the touch of a woman.
>dropped the facade >still refusing to answer the questions >doubled down on the moronation >claim to have won after being assraped by 4 anons that simply made a question
You will never amount to anyone important in your life for all the preaching for "justice" you do.
You're a cog in the machine and one that can be replaced with the snap of a finger, and the corporations and China don't even have to acknowledge you exist to do so.
You're a statistic that benefits them. Nothing more.
If you guys really cared about sex in video games, you would buy the fricking plethora of H-games that Japan releases instead of complaining about a childrens star wars autism simulator texture.
Literally 1984
If it's not important, why did they change it in the first place?
well, you see, type A's might get aroused from seeing a cleavage.
why is that a problem you ask? well, you see, type B's are getting mad as frick when type A's look at a picture of another type B instead of them. the solution is to reduce sexual identification of virtual type B's, so that type A's look more at actual type B's again.
why does anyone care about screeching type B's? well, that's a whole other mystery that waits to be solved. maybe you will discover it one day.
are you getting aroused from looking at lego breasts or is this copypasta
no, it's simply that type B's feel threatened by virtual type B's and feel the need to remove secondary sexual characteristics from virtual type B's.
I think the most fascinating thing about this ordeal is how pointing out type B's insecurity leads to type A's+B's attacking other type A's+B's over the change.
You got it dude
The game is for kids, why do you want your 10 year old kid to look at anything sexual? Are you a troony?
>lego clevage
>sexual
>doesn't get hard from cleavage
yep, it's a troony
>lego clevage
>sexual
i jerked off to this when i was a teenager and it looks like shit compared to the curves in the OP
you guys are just gay
thank you for confirming that you are actually a degenerate. now explain everyone why you should be making rules on how to protect children.
homie you are a troony trying to poison the minds of young kids with degeneracy
the catholic church should have burned you gays instead of the witches
oh, so you are an actual sandBlack person who gets aroused at the tiniest display of skin, could have made that clear from the start.
only problem here is that your kind are too insane and barbaric to ever watch over children or women. only fitting that a pedo like you tries to invoke a religion known for childrape and sacrifice.
That was 2020. They're different people now. How dare you.
Nice strawman troony, you will burn in hell for trying to manipulate innocent children into your degeneracy.
I don't care about Sweden. They deserve all the shit they get.
A Russian invasion that would literally save the last Swedes from genocide. lol
the Russians will rape the Swedes too
So we should cut off breasts off of real, live women, because they have cleavage and that is degeneracy?
You are a fricking moron.
That thing is fully nude with a human females form, way different than lego bricks.
since when is a cleavage too sexual for kids?
are you one of these degenerates that jerks it to sonic?
homie HAVE YOU SEEN THE TOYS THAT KIDS HAVE PLAYED WITH FOR FRICKING DECADES???????????????
have you never seen barbie and other dolls?
Yeah, Barbie, Bratz and pee-poo dolls, thanks clapistan.
Please let your child out of the basement
Bruh, I was like 5 and I remember feeling funny watching sailor moon transform on tv. She went all naked and it made me feel weird. I couldn't really explain it, but I really liked that part of the show specifically, even if I thought everything else was boring as frick.
To this day I'm pretty sure that show was explicitly made to turn young, innocent boys like me into heterosexuals.
It made you into an anime watching troony
I don't watch anime, and I'm not a troony.
You posted an anime image
It's a drawing, schizo.
have a nice day homosexual freak
>Implying you werent looking at porn at age 10
NOOO THEY'RE TURNING THE HECKIN KIDS STRAIGHT SAVE ME BIDEN
>Why are you so upset about lego cleavage, you pervert?
>BUT WHAT IF THE KIDS SEE THE CLEAVAGE IN THE LEGO GAME EVEN THOUGH IT WAS THERE BEFORE AND CLEAVAGE IS EVERYWHERE
But to answer your question, boys shouldn’t be denied their first pee pee getting hard.
>boys shouldn’t be denied their first pee pee getting hard.
have a nice day pedo
>a kid getting his erection is pedophilia
So does that make the kid the pedo or what?
You have nothing to say so you assume other people are pedos. You're projecting.
>He doesn’t know the feeling of seeing a hot character in something you like for the first time
shame.
Alright troony, just because it worked SO WELL for you doesn't mean my kids need to go through it as well
99.999% of men on this earth got an erection when they were under 13, and that’s the latest it will happen.
Ban mothers, they're molesting their own kids by having breasts LMAOO
The left one looks like shit for starters
Elaborate.
They're contractually obligated to depict the most recent LEGO character minifigures in the game. Blame LEGO for changing it
Why do you need every piece of media to fulfill your pornography addiction?
A female has breasts, princess Leia is a female. Why do you want to remove the breasts of a female? There is nothing inherently sexual about breasts, it is recent feminism and an american obsession of being afraid and disgusted of the naked human body that has brought about this mentally ill view to light.
The human body is not inherently sexual, it is precisely your porn addiction that makes you think everything is sexual, projecting and virtue signalling doesn't absolve you.
They also have asses, fingers, toes and more features that Lego figurines don't typically emphasize. Don't be so disingenuous. Why hyper fixate on the breasts specifically without mentioning these other things?
>Only answer is "Why shouldn't it"
Unironically "Muh chillens", Ganker loves that excuse when it comes to things they don't like.
Now watch people ignore this point too
To trap people like you into outing themselves as lego coomers.
we need to censor fishers breasts in the film now
NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO STOP MAKING SENSE CHUD
Why not? It's not important right? What's wrong with changing something that's not important?
>waste effort and time on something utterly pointless
could've maybe worked on the soulless gmod-tier environment textures instead of erasing cleavage textures
It's a remake, right? They already have to spend resources upscaling the textures and making new shit.
holy frick you have a point.
Because Star Wars is now owned by Disney and they want to maintain a family-friendly image, i.e. no breasts, alcohol, smoking, etc.
this makes no sense. if its not important then why not change it while making the new model if you want to? if there was outcry about the cleavage from consumers then yes this would be moronic but its a really basic design decision made by the people designing the game. if a dev decided they wanted to get rid of lego's dick bulge in a kid's game who are you to say it's wrong to make the decision? you can not like it but clutching your pearls over the change is moronic.
>No one could answer this
Jesus this board really is filled with nothing but reddithomosexuals crying for more censorship nowadays.
>Outfit that was only ever added for fanservice gets toned down in a literal children's game
>Some fat neckbeard moron can't understand why this would be seen as a reasonable decision to make.
Let me guess, trannies groom kids but this shit is okay because you like it?
gays talking about taking dick up the ass disgusts you but everyone should listen about how hard you get from fanservice?
have a nice day moron.
Boobs exist, they’ll always exist and they are a natural thing. A kid will look at breasts and see nothing, literally, until their the age that those type of things become appealing. It’s much different than trannies telling kids about gender identity and all this other made up shit, kids have free access to the internet for almost 2 decades now and its even worse than anything a kids game could put out. have a nice day you disingenuous piece of shit, genuinely.
So you're basically arguing why nudist pride parades should allow children because dicks and balls and boobs exist.
You're moronic, homosexual.
Unironically can't even see the forest for the trees because you're a moronic masturbation addict.
>So you're basically arguing why nudist pride parades should allow children because dicks and balls and boobs exist.
That is a good argument, I don’t believe that though. I just think it’s stupid how much things from the past are forced to be censored despite how little the parents seem to care, considering every kid has an iPad now. breasts meant nothing to me up until I was like 10 but seeing a grown mans dick and balls is truly horrific.
If you're willing to let a child see the clear outline of a man's dick and balls because you want to coom to flat drawn cleavage lines in a lego game you have some growing up to do.
I did not say that, you have a mental illness.
Okay coomer.
More like I'm literally running out of characters to type with because so many of you bum blasted porn addicts can't cope with the fact no one gives a shit about you or your moronic fake anti censorship moral grandstanding.
have a nice day.
>gets called a basic b***h
>proceeds to write a wall of butthurt
So you're either a b***h or a troon. The plot thiccens
has anyone posted picrel?
no?
well there ya have it :DDD
>troony sex bad, but straight sex good?
Yes, moron.
But gay sex good?
Animals do it too so it must be "Natural" right?
Or is your stance going to suddenly shift into Christcuck morality now that "Natural" is no longer helping you?
That's a lot of strawmaning you got there
>Strawmanning
Why is troony sex bad then if you're not trying to shift to a naturalistic argument?
Enlighten me dumbass, I'm pretty sure you're spewing buzzwords because you realize I just knocked your argument on its ass.
>Enlighten me dumbass
Why should I try to argue with someone who's clearly just here to be buttmad because no one wants to touch his pubic gash with a barge pole? I'll be wasting my time, as well as validating your invalid fee-fees.
You ascribe boogeymen because you can't argue your point.
You're posting long winded drivel because you're angry.
You can't even argue the point and feel the need to point out you're a different guy despite the fact you felt the need to step in for him.
And letting a child see a grown man's penis is normal?
> You're posting long winded drivel because you're angry.
No, I asked a few questions that you can’t seem to answer and pointed out that you immediately got defensive when anon called out your weak “it’s not important” defense.
Don’t get pissy just because people are poking holes in your dumb ideology. Argue your point.
And I didn't bother reading beyond the first sentence because you're unable to be concise, maybe you should argue your point first and virtue signal to porn addicted morons at the end of your dogshit post, homosexual.
> And I didn't bother reading beyond the first sentence
Yes you did, and now you are using that as an excuse to not argue your points because you have none. Either that, or you are a twittertard that associates 4 sentences as being “cringe” and are therefore not worth much.
Bro you're literally competing for my time with 4 other people, you realize that right? I'm the commodity here, the fact you keep replying proves you desperately want to interact with me.
No, it proves that you are very desperately trying to not argue my points because you have no argument. You’re now trying to shift the topic. I won’t let you.
Answer why you and others say it’s not important, then get mad when people point out that it wouldn’t be changed if it wasn’t important.
>make a post 5 lines long
>wtf someone responds to me with more then a sentence? IGNORE
So it’s ok when you do it?
I keep my post concise and save namecalling for the end, brevity is the soul of wit.
Seems you're unarmed in this battle of wits, moron.
>I make the rules of conduct here
Me and the rest of the bros in this shitfling disagree, probably
But you didn’t, you wrote 5 sentences and then tried to shame anon because he wrote 8. You are just trying to discredit him while ignoring that you did the same thing
5 sentences is concise but a few sentences more isn’t? Also where is this arbitrary number game coming from?
This is the problem, you gays from twitter want everything to be black and white when everything is shades of grey. You have to go into detail you homosexual, otherwise you end up with current politics of “red/blue team good/bad” without any sort of examination of the nuance.
I am the commodity here and you're not.
Either make your point in non lefty meme format or don't post, moron.
You aren’t the “commodity”, you are just trying to make up excuses on why you won’t argue the point on shit because you know you’re wrong. Multiple people have pointed this out and you keep making shit up to avoid that. I am currently rubbing your nose in it.
Stop running or concede.
Maybe multiple people calling you moronic should suggest to you that you aren’t in the right. You know, instead of arguing semantics on Ganker post procedure. Really, that’s the most damning thing anon, if you had actual arguments you’d argue with them instead of trying to dictate how long someone’s post should be.
>Maybe multiple people calling you moronic should suggest to you that you aren’t in the right.
Funny when this argument is used in social media for "Likes" and shit you friendless homosexuals lose your mind.
Is it different now because 4 other morons agree with you?
Because a “like” isn’t 5 people giving you well thought out arguments, it’s a symbol of general agreement that means nothing.
>cries about boogeymen since the beginning
>accuses someone else of the same
>thinks it's a valid argument since he can't realize how hard he's projecting
Bro... lmao
>Display you're addicted to porn
>Get called a porn addict
>Call the person a troony in return
>"I-I just did what you did"
This is fricking pathetic.
You never called me a porn addict though. You realize you're talking to multiple people, right? Or are you too angry to realize that? Do feel free to keep seething though. Seeing people being buttmad about legos is oddly schadenfreudish
Yes, multiple people are competing for my time including you.
You feel the need to defend them but shy away from all their talking points and grievances because you realize I trash canned them and will trash can you in the same way.
Be a little more interesting please, this reddit arguing where you skirt around everything and get mad while not saying anything is really fricking gay.
You realize it's literally just a flat png texture right? I'm guessing you know nothing about texture work because you seem to believe it takes a lot of work to remove something so simple.
More like I only have to respond to what tickles my fancy, you're still responding.
*yawn* getting bored again
>You feel the need to defend them but shy away from all their talking points and grievances because you realize I trash canned them and will trash can you in the same way.
What the hell are you even talking about lmao? I feel the need to make fun of and giggle my ass off at a buttmad moron who needs to take a chill pill and go touch grass
>Be a little more interesting please, this reddit arguing where you skirt around everything and get mad while not saying anything is really fricking gay.
That's what an actual clown would say
That's funny you were pretending this was an argument a moment ago but when I pointed out you're doing that passive aggressive thing where people refuse to talk about what they're mad at but they're argumentative suddenly you're trolling.
There's no reason to care about the inclusion of such things in a children's game.
You're arguing for why they should be lazy instead of why they should be in the game.
You're punching your own argument, moron.
I'm dumpstering you and your friends in front of everyone.
You're complaining about your argument and you have YET to state it, your posts always start with some moral grandstanding because you can't merely state your point.
> There's no reason to care about the inclusion of such things in a children's game.
There is no reason to care about them excluding such things too by that logic, yet here you are arguing about 5 people defending it while also trying to say it isn’t important, even though removing something like this would cost money to the company.
>There is no reason to care about them excluding such things too by that logic
Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
"B-b-but cleavage isn't sexu-"
Go ahead and say it buddy, admit you're a moron.
"U a twanny"
Compelling dude, Clearly your wanted a scrap of my attention because your recognized that your kind was walking among you.
Calling someone a troony or crying you can't jerk off isn't a well thought out argument you dumb wienersucker.
Oops didn't state it again!
And what ego? You're responding to me b***h.
>oh noes he said the bad wod
Would calling you a massive homosexual make your boo-boo feel better?
> Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
And yet it had this and more when I was a child and my generation ended up just fine, funny that. Also women themselves argue that boobs aren’t sexual and that they should breast feed in public and such, yet none of them ever do. Almost like men would be fine with it and they themselves are perpetuating that it’s secual
> Calling someone a troony or crying you can't jerk off isn't a well thought out argument you dumb wienersucker.
Never did that though
>Wrong, there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
Why is Slave Leia being sexualized in the movie ok then?
wasn't the point of Leia getting slaved was Jabba being a frickhead and underestimating Leia so he gave her the very means to kill him via the chain.
I'm amazed to see you are trying desperately to not take the L and get the last word on this argument of the necessity to edit the lego tiddies out since they weren't important to begin with.
Literal redditor behavior from A to Z.
> And what ego? You're responding to me b***h.
You’re trying to act like you’re too important to read points against you, yes you are inflating your ego
> there is a decent argument to make, a kid's game doesn't need sexualized fanservice.
Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head and that’s fine?
>Why is fictional violence okay but porn not okay
You ever wonder why kids can't look at actual porn despite the fact they're not the once fricking the women in them?
Do you ever think that the act of defeating an enemy is what compels a gamer and not specifically "Shooting" them?
Moron.
Better than skirting around the argument and pretending to be a troll like you.
>t-twanny
Funny how mad you get when you eat your own shit
Cleavage isn’t porn. Your mother has cleavage. Any woman that isn’t absolutely flat has cleavage.
Why are you trying to equate fictionally cleavage to real life porn, or someone shooting someone in the head?
Every man also has a dick and balls, you're not making a point, you're just repeating the same shit because you realize you have no argument
>Every man also has a dick and balls
In what country do you live where men have their dicks and balls out?
What does that matter? All men have them, women can cover cleavage.
Did you realize you fricked up again?
>Get mad fun of
>"L-lol u mad"
Takes me back, moron.
You seem huttburt.
>Le epic laughing image because he got angry
Here we go, more passive aggressive behavior.
Funny how much you pretend to hate twitter and do the same shit when you're furious.
*yawn*
"we"
>Funny how much you pretend to hate twitter and do the same shit when you're furious.
>you're furious.
>clearly laughing
shit baitto, tbh.
>yawn
Answer the question, don’t run. You were so confident a minute ago.
he won't, he'll try to turn the conversation in his favor by quoting specific people. see:
That's a long-winded way of saying no u
Every time you say “yawn” you’re just conceding that you have no argument lmao. Why are zoomers so bad at arguing?
Zoomers grew up on the internet and attach their lives to it, so they can’t stand being wrong because to them it’s an affront on their existence. So they get pissy and argue and the minute they lose they do an ebin “dismissal” like “didn’t ask” and other shit in order to protect their fragile egos.
>What does that matter? All men have them,
again, in which country do you live where men have their wieners and balls out? I'm genuinely interested
>women can cover cleavage.
except when they don't, which is also a pretty normal thing for women. have you ever met a woman before?
>we
"We" what? This is a board. People interact with each other. "We"
one of the first interactions you have with another human isn't sucking on a dick though is it
I don’t remember a point in time where men have their dicks on display in public literally every single fricking day, and I didn’t suck on a dick to get breast milk as a child.
Cleavage is not porn. It is not the same as someone shooting someone in the fricking face.
breasts are chest. wiener, balls, vegana are genitalia.
I mean frick he would have a slight point if nipples were included but frickin g cleavage being equates to porn is full on moronic
Because he wishes he was a woman and has sexually idolised women to the point where real breasts are an impossible-to-acquire beacon of sexiness
>Better than skirting around the argument and pretending to be a troll like you.
>pretending to be a troll like you.
>did not but try to troll everyone until own-shit snowball
HAHAHA, it's funny feeding your shit attempts at baitto.
At least I'm not hiding behind multiple morons and pretending to be above it all while refusing to provide an argument of worth.
Must feel nice to be able to validate yourself when no one else will do it for you.
>At least I'm not hiding behind multiple morons and pretending to be above it all while refusing to provide an argument of worth.
>right after being presented arguments from 3 different anons and being assraped on the process, then dismissing everything that couldn't be cherry-picked
DOUBLING DOWN ON "moron ON PURPOSE"
>mad just because someone called him a hypothetical troon based on writing patterns
Lol
What argument ? This is the second thing I wrote
Keep up son. You're clearly snowballing in your own bullshit
> You're complaining about your argument and you have YET to state it,
It’s been stated multiple times and you keep ignoring it, grandstanding like your a “commodity” and inflating your ego
>You're punching your own argument, moron.
I'm dumpstering you and your friends in front of everyone.
>unironically believes in his own rubbish
No reaction image can describe my level of amusement
>So angry he can't even greentext properly
Yikesaroo dude
>angry
Not really. I'm a phonegay who's amusing himself before he hits the sack. At least be grateful I don't use autocorrect. But do feel free to keep grasping at straws
> You realize it's literally just a flat png texture right? I'm guessing you know nothing about texture work because you seem to believe it takes a lot of work to remove something so simple.
And it takes even less work to not edit it at all, so why would you change it and literally waste money and time doing that if it isn’t important?
Anon I could shoop a big dick into a screencap of your post on about 10 seconds, it still takes work to do so
>More like I only have to respond to what tickles my fancy, you're still responding.
Yes. I do enjoy pushing someone's buttons without even trying
You're chasing shadows right now, the anon that replied to you wasn't even me. Stop bringing your gay shit into a discussion that has nothing to do with it
But you and your disingenuous compatriots are arguing that it isn’t important, when it very clearly is given how defensive you get. Why not argue what you fricking mean instead of defaulting to the next line of logic to try to “stay right”?
And no anon, removing cleavage would not affect children that weren’t already noticing boobs in the first place. Barbies and fricking tv shows exist, Moms in cartoons have boobs. Hell, the kids mom’s have boobs.
No seriously, why the frick is it suddenly a problem to have this shit when we had entire generations raised on seeing cleavage that turned out ok? Why is this an immediate problem now? Because it isn’t and the kid doesn’t care so the company is wasting time and resource for stupid brownie points, which deserves to be mocked.
And further more why is noting a difference in biology bad? Why is having kids kill each other violently in videogames fine but cleavage needs to be censored? You can’t have this both ways.
breasts are normal, cutting your dick off isnt you fricking moron.
Self-mutilation in general is bad mmmmmmk
Because corporations are notorious for inventing "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!!" puritans who gasp, faint, and then regain consciousness and enter a mindset akin to a raging wildebeest and stampede in the billions, causing the entire company to bleed their entire stocks and leave them for dead.
Yes I'm sure they'll miss those millions of sales from third world porn addicts on Ganker they would have gotten for full price sales on Lego Star Wars.
They’ll miss the money that someone wasted to change something harmless that gives them exact zero money.
>Deleting a png texture
>More than 10 seconds of work on the clock from an intern
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
And? That’s time wasted on shit that doesn’t make money, and that’s money wasted on reprinting this shit that doesn’t make money and changing everything and of course inevitable miscommunications on prints and such. It adds up. It’s this sort of mentality that made people at the top shit themselves at bottom lines a few months down the road.
t. Worked in the toy industry for 5 years
>t. Worked in the toy industry for 5 years
You and I both know that's a lie especially because you double down on deleting a png texture being "Money wasted"
Disingenuous as always
> You and I both know that's a lie especially because you double down on deleting a png texture being "Money wasted"
Kek, anon please describe the printing process.
Printing process has nothing to do with deleting a 10kb line texture.
Keep going.
Hm yes anon, and the fact that they likely had massive inventory of the old design that they could have easily repurposed and resold for 100% profit, but instead decided to do an arbitrary “fix” that lead to thousands of reprints for exactly zero monetary gain… yes you’re right, I’m sure they lost no money on this!
>inb4 they wouldn’t just reuse inventory like that!
They would and do, constantly. You’d know this if you were in the industry.
Chances are didn’t go out of their way to change an existing print though. They probably started from the ground up for the new set while using the old figure as a reference. Point being they would have done the new work anyways
You and I both know that took all of five minutes to change
>astroturfing
Every. Fricking. Time
If it's not important then it doesn't matter if it's changed. This pretend-gotcha argument never made sense to me.
Why change something if it doesn’t matter then?
Why not change it? It doesn't matter, right?
Because that takes time and effort to change something.
You don’t even need to know much about game design to know change takes time and energy
If it's an insignificant thing somebody feels like doing and everyone else on the project agrees with it I don't see any problem why they shouldn't be allowed to do it.
It has been stated multiple times that the mini figure models get updated when new sets are released, and the game just uses the latest designs from the sets
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH DRAWN ON CLEAVAGE ON THE FLAT SURFACE OF LEGO! PROTECT THE KIDS!
>yes let's make more dicky gays, fur gays, literal gays or autismos in general that want to sexualize inanimate objects
I think the soccer moms were right, you sickos need to learn your place tbqhfam.
Minecraft is the furthest thing from sexual and yet there's still tons of porn made of it.
But the game itself doesnt moron.
Neither does lego.
As it should be.
It was always the case though. only now anything outside of burka is considered sexual or pornographic
ironic given star wars wasn't really meant for kids
>ironic given star wars wasn't really meant for kids
Grow the frick up
There was also children's merchandising for Alien, Terminator, Robocop, and fricking Rambo.
They weren't meant for kids either, but back when boys had fathers they watched cool shit that wasn't laser targeted at them.
The difference is, those became for kids retroactively. Terminator 2, Aliens, Rambo 3, etc., are all decidedly kids movies.
Star Wars from the outset was intended for broad appeal and appealed predominately to children. The only reason people say it wasn't now is because those kids grew up and are ashamed to like kids media or something.
Chicken and egg, Elsa and Spiderman are also not inherently sexual.
>guy wearing spandex and squirting his white sticky goo at people isn't inherently sexual
Captcha: ARAAA
>SEX SEX SEX EVERYTHING SHOULD HAVE SEX
this is how zoomers grew up to be blacked and NTR worshippers
Question: was the ACTUAL minifig changed too, or just the video game one?
Just the videogame one.
It didnt but censorship apologist will tell you it did and try to bullshit some kind of lego law without any proof.
They don't even produce that minifig anymore because it's problematic, so I don't know if you could call that "changing it"
See
Thank you for clarifying. I 100% would believe this would be the actual answer
You frickers need to go rope yourself for pulling shit out of your ass for the sake of attempting to instigate a flame war.
It's 100 posts in anon, there's nothing left to instigate. It's already instigated
Jedi was 1983.
every year things get worse and I don't see a light at the end of the tunnel
Never give trannies an inch. Ever. Not even this fricking lego breasts.
breasts belong in videogames. Trannies don't belong anywhere.
Never let evil take root.
Never surrender.
We will win. By any means necessary.
Die troony.
Cap it off with a schizo post, nice
How bad must your life be that you were jerking off to the cleavage of a Lego brick
I've jerk offd to nothing but Lego women for the last eight months.
It's pretty fricking good I must say
literally not a lego body.
realistic asian face tho
>off model shit
HOW VERY UN-BASED OF YOU
It's by an artist who works on the show which is just as good
How bad must your life be that you feel that cleavage on a fricking Lego brick is problematic?
How bad is your life that a lego brick having breasts is a problem
Both male and female audiences have a good design.
>i'm more into the one for the "female audience" than the one for the "male audience"
oh no...
Time to transition.
But then I'll have to like the 3rd one.
Nothing wrong with this, only trannies are rednecks have an issue with people not conforming to every gender norm exactly.
Only trannies you fence sitting tard. Rednecks have their sisters going out into the river to catch big fish with bikinis on.
They might like women doing masculine activities but not the other way around.
the female audience one is objectively better
Frick off homosexual, you can enjoy shit and still be a man. Fricking loser.
snip snip buddy
>likes the more feminine female
I dunno, anon. I think you might have caught the straights.
The dire straights?
No that's when you're attracted to everything female including ftm trannies.
The straights is when you just love everything feminine and female. Anon needs to seek treatment or he will lose the natural male attraction to tomboys.
Female audience design is by far the best of these 3.
It’s a more subtle form of beauty that doesn’t feel the need to shove it in your face. The male one is cringy because it looks like what you’d find in a dudebro magazine rather than an actual character design.
"male audience" looks like what gay men think straight men want.
> "male audience" looks like what gay men think straight men want
Sounds like something a closer homosexual would say
designed to appeal to me
dyke
is that so
How bad is life that one needs to censor lego breasts. Are people scared of children having their first boners now or what?
I would be sacred if children had their first boner looking at lego yes
What if i was from statues?
>minecraft porn
>minecraft porn on youtube in the millions
>roblox porn
>literal lego porn ala the Lego Movie/TV shows
>furries-
Yes I would be afraid of my kid's possible sexual awakenings, in fact I'd rather raise a sheltered serial killer.
>jerking off
who said anything about that you fricking schizo?
>How could you possibly find Legos sexual?
followed with
>ITS FOR KIDS WHY DO YOU WANT YOUR KIDS LOOKING AT SOMETHING SO SEXUAL?
Nice doublethink moron
What's worse? Fapping to that, or feeling that it needs to be censored?
Fapping to that
this is how it starts, then they use the same argument to take it all away bit by bit until you are left with nothing creative or challenging, or god forbid arousing. If we dont fight back now, we have already lost.
>just dont buy the horse no one forces you
enjoying buying beta of games thanks to that thought?
censorship is bad, moron
even in a lego game
Not to mention
>removing a line that represents breasts
>on a lego
Sjw titlets are desperate
it's not just censorship, it's stupid censorship
>oh no not cleavage lines on a girl in a bra
someone decided "we need to censor this"...in a LEGO GAME.
>in a LEGO GAME.
Yes. It's beyond moronic
>coombrain immediately thinks of one thing and one thing only
are you part of some london rape gang? is the threat of seeing a couple lines on a minifig enough to send you into a lust filled frenzy?
I have not jerk offd to completion to anything that was not made of lego since the 29th of September 2019
>How bad must your life be that you have to censor the printed on cleavage of a SLAVE leia figure.
Most people weren’t jerking off to it in the first place so it’s even weirder that they thought to remove it.
Whoever decided to censor it probably jerks it to minecraft and roblox
They should keep an eye on that fella then. Something about jerking off to porn of a game that’s majorly used by children online is kinda sussy.
Legos do wonders if you have a giant fetish.
>Build lego town
>Populate it with lego people posed like they are running in terror
>Procede to jack off all over your lego city raining your giant sperm all over the terrified denizens.
>mfw legos enable anal vore fetishists
Beyond disgusting
Where do you think you are?
hey don't lump us brick frickers with those mini figure frickers
this, why would you want to sexualize lego in the first place?
this, why even give them female voices? they should all sound the same
true, i like it when the lego people don't have dialogue it feels appropriate.
How bad must your life be if you censor the cleavage of a Lego brick
woah woah woah
I literally cannot play old lego games because of my raging boner. I'm glad they god rid of this stupid sexy lego cleavage so I can finally enjoy the new game in peace.
don't we have a moron doing this right now? kek and jej.
imo, it's not a problem that a lego character no longer has cleavage.
the problem is the reason she doesn't. the mental sickness of the people behind the change is the disease ruining everything good. these people can't produce anything of value, they do not value anything that already exists and actively try to ruin it with retcons and just flat out reboots, they are the modern iconoclasts and they need ropes around their throats.
>censoring kids games is mental illness
for the reasons they do it, yes.
Who are you referring to? Who is “they” and what are their reasons?
cultural marxists and their semi-religious zealotry to making every single thing political and deconstructing it.
their fanatical, cult-like ideology is a rampant disease that needs to be burned out of society.
>appeasing hardcore conservative evangelists is marxism
The shit you people come up with
when we were growing up it was the conservatives pulling this shit.
now it's these leftist homosexuals with their deconstructionist ideological campaign. the difference is that they actually inserted themselves into the places needed to achieve their censorship, where boomer conservatards just b***hed and whined about it like they do about everything.
>the difference is that they actually inserted themselves into the places needed to achieve their censorship
It’s fricking Lego. Where did they insert themselves? Denmark?
Censoring cleavage means you can sell to the puritans and the muslims and the sjws. They’re not after cultural change, they just want money
every technological company, every layer of media, most layers of government.
they are an infestation. a rotting, malignant disease. they aren't even a collective group doing it by someone's order, they are just corrupted with this ideology from the indoctrination to it they have had through the education system.
>THEY’RE EVERYWHERE THEY’RE IN MY WALLS THEY CAN HEAR US RIGHT NOW
yes yes, your kind always pull this reductivist nonsense to attempt to delegitimize anything against you.
you're cretins, and people corrupted with these ideas should have their heads blown off or their necks stretched. the only thing that will heal society of you is your death.
Coomers have been kicked out of society rightfully but you idiots keep praying for their return to ruin society
never mind
mods fixed it
carry on
>Slave Leia
It's "Boba Fett's Spaceship" Leia, sweaty.
subtle
it's Firespray
Nice
>give Disney money because someone outside of Disney modded their thing
"No".
>give Disney money
>no
fixed
Why do they whine about the cleavage and completely ignore that the loincloth has been turned into pants?
Came to ask the same thing.
Why are you looking at lego breasts?
Why aren't you homo?
Why is a grown man playing Lego games in the first place?
imagine jerking off to Lego characters
This is the last fricking straw.
Frick this pozzed world.
Some of you are alright, don't go to any Lego store tomorrow.
I can't even tell if this is genuine or not considering the insanity on this site. On the chance it's not, it's prime shitposting and I had a giggle.
>coomers think its about fapping
eh, it's a kid's game I can see why they did this.
it's not cleavage if it's a flat texture
I like how this moron thinks it's the same guy.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised at him being illiterate.
I don't because you know they'd charge you an extra dollar for that part.
She probably went all IMAGINE.
Not really comparable. The penis shouldn't be noticeable if wearing pants.
Speak for yourself
Yellow hands
and then the room clapped her mom's cheeks
then she said
>only the black ones
And then everyone clapped
I thought one of the big womens' empowerment arguments these days was the desexualization of the breasts. Why are they using breasts as an analogue for penises when that should, realistically, be the vegana instead?
lego has been censoring shit for decades
the fake hips (null space imposed with brown) look moronic alone, I always thought this. It'd be funnier if she just had the bikini top, and I would play these games for fun or laughs as a kid.
You guys are pathetic
yeah yeah your porn is gone whatever, but what the frick are these things supposed to be?
Intel cases? They flash and I assume that black piece is like a lever, plus you get unlockables from them.
Minikits. Basically boxes that have the pieces to build small-scale models of vehicles, dioramas, etc. at the end of the level.
I didn't know what they were either, but starting with LEGO Marvel Super Heroes they were phased out in favor of boxes (which get open at the end-level screen).
>t. 100%'ed 15 LEGO games
Futuristic traffic lights.
>censored
>lego
Imagine being this underage
I legit wouldn't be able to identify the character if it wasn't for the cleavage. I just skimmed the pic without reading and only when I laid eyes on left I realized it was Leia
tbqh im surprised slave leia is even okay in general these days. I thought she'd have been scrubbed from the franchise in every case except the original movie the outfit appeared in by now.
i think it gets the legacy of-
>le sexy + empowering
considering she strangles Jabba, plus it's tied to a franchise that has these homosexuals by the leash. The irony is almost poetic, it sort of rhymes.
do women like having boobs? It seems like they wish they could not deal with carrying them around for other people's benefit. This would be like censoring a man by making him shorter
>do women like having boobs?
generally yes but sometimes there is the usual envy where girls with big boobs want smaller ones and those with small boobs want bigger ones
The only people who want this kind of shit are pedos and trannies. The game is literally for children under the age of 12. Highly sexualizing kids prior to puberty is always linked to fricked up mental illnesses later in life.
yeah, like being heterosexual and standing up for themselves, rather than being cucked bigay basedboys
Leaving cleavage in a lego game is not highly sexualizing and isn't going to do anything. Do you also believe bikinis are giving kids mental illness
american beaches should be 21+
meanwhile your 14yo daughter sucks Black person dicks for milk money behind school
worked for previous gens, or are you going to ignore the comics with sexy characters and 80s/90s cool gamer with sexy girls culture?
what are you talking about you moron, my parents shamed me any time they looked at my browser history when i was a teen and it fricked my brain and made me think too much about sex stuff. family exposed me to smoking and drinking tho and it made me abhor it. you need have some exposure otherwise you'll irrationally seek it out because your brain tells you .you're being deprived of it.
It was censored in the set too, 4480 and 6210 had cleavage, the game one is headed based on 75020
Not even Legos are safe from this moronation
>legos
>Ganker is pro-censorship now
i hate what /misc/gays did to this board
>he doesn't want a white picket fence, an aryan wife and to ditch videogames
you wont be like me (pic related) other wise
Why do morons act like it's the same game censored, and not a different game completely?
>Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy (2006)
>Lego Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga (2022)
It was ok then, it's not ok now.
The breasts were ok on the old the old figure, they're not ok now.
Yeah, seems like a problem; tell /toy/
>2022 Anno Domini
>caring about Star Wars
Ignore modernity, embrace tradition.
inb4
>it's weird that you care
>but it's okay that we cared enough to remove it
Yes but they added the thong straps to the new model
>censor the cleavage
>but expand the moronic painted on curves
we live in a society
They had some pretty sexy legos in that game. Shame about no CaC or else I would've spent a bunch of time taking screenshots of my own Twi'lek prostitute OC
Oola got censored too by making her legs duel molded, though it doesn't appear that way in the front. She was in Lego Force Awakens too, where she had her original legs.
Games aren't censored because of ideology, they are censored because of youtubers and streamers who want to put cola ads before their videos and streams.
If you watch video game streams, you're part of the problem.
>every game now has to be family friendly cause of the standards of mcdoanlds adverts
>white woman clevage bad
>mutt glohomosexual homosexualrygood
which one is male
Yes
You have a pornography addiction which you need to address, otherwise you will become a transsexual.
>trannies: want to be women
>also trannies: removes cleavage from women characters in video games so people think that women can be women without boobs
kill and gas all trannies
>...AND THEN THEY CENSORED THE breasts OF THE SLAVE LEYA LEGO FIGURE IN A VIDEO GAME AND...
Stop acting like an obnoxious homosexual on purpose.
IWTFTL
Looks nothing like a lego.
These israelite ESG companies want everyone to be a sexless, genderless, homosexual, raceless golem that doesn't reproduce without their permission
video games are fricking dead.
While I think that complaining about cleavage in a LEGO game is excessive, I do wish that people could complain about the obvious toning down of sexuality in games without being insulted. I don't mind women characters in games being more than eye candy, but I don't feel that censorship like what Sony has been doing with Japanese games is a good thing.
REMEMBER WHVT THEY TVVK FRVM YOV
The abobawde state of this board look at yourselves
>The abobawde state of this board look at yourselves
these homosexual studios today must HATE that she's very obviously forced to wear a bikini as part of the plot of the movie, they literally can't ignore it. you just know they want her covered head to toe like a fricking muslim, the absolute irony of modern day liberals
NOT THE LEGO BOOPARINOS
That's it. This far but no further, I am voting republican for the rest of my life.
Prudishness is one of the things that is bipartisan
The model itself looks way worse. This feels less like censorship and more like laziness, or what they did to the GTA remastered trilogy.
It's really the least of the games problems, the game was awful and not one of the family members I bought it for played it for more than an hour or two where most of them finish every other lego game I've gotten for them.
>sneaking in problems into games with bigger problems so it doesn't seem like a big deal and random tards on the internet neglect it
Devilish
>actually so fricking mad over two lines on a LEGO model that you remove it in the first place
That's even worse.
It's the left image another game? Because if it is that means they literally redesigned a lot of shit, it was not a outrage inside the studio or anything. And even if it's a stupid "change", sperging and raging over this only makes you look like a sexless virgin.
>sperging and raging over this only makes you look like a sexless virgin.
Good thing I'm doing neither of those then. On a related note, acting like a passive aggressive c**t over legos isn't doing you any favors.
People may say Lego ain't sexy, but Wyldstyle from The Lego Movie has some very nice fanart.
True, she was the first time I ever saw a lego character in that way lol
yeah lol lego are sexy when they're just regular hot women but with yellow skin lmao
I dont care about breasts in lego. it's the principle.
>we need to censor 2 lines on lego leia
If your "principle" require you to get mad at Lego breasts then your principle sounds kinda stupid
the problem is censorship on everything, and stupid things like fricking LEGO breasts.
>actually mad they gave real women more of a choice when it comes to their reproductive holes.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Was that cleavage there on the irl minifig?
On the old version yes but not on the new figures. Thats also why it is the same in the game now.
don't worry they'll come for your game next, they already have a foothold in japan (see spike chunsoft), australia is in too deep, and europe isn't far them behind
before long games will just be visual novels with no blood, no nudity, and every character will be a mulatto brown or trans to conform with the status quo
I need to seriously spend less time on the internet...
Do it, focus on doing stuff you like, play only games you're actively enjoying your time with, watch only the best shows and movies for your preferences and don't give a shit about the misery and bullshit going on and being perpetrated by our stupid species. it's a lot nicer this way. typing that is a nice reminder to gtfo here, it'll never be 2006 again.
suck my dick election c**ts, videogames
"I'm simply against censorship, you fricking commie!"
"Oh good, there are tons of people being censored on issues that don't involve pornograp-"
"I DON'T CARE GB2/pol/!!!"
You morons should honestly have a nice day.
Just standing behind grandiose moral platforms only to cuck out when it doesn't satisfy your whims.
What the frick is this coomer shit. Jerking off to literal legos.
I prefer the DFC
>nooooo Carrie Fisher didn't have ti-
It's appealing to a broader demographic, dipshit. Women make up more than half of the population in the US so of course they are going to appeal to them. It makes business sense to censor what women don't like so the larger audience will purchase the game.
>skirt looks like shorts
>cleavage removed = DFC Leia except
>bra looks like male chestplate = gay
>face looks like a man's = gay
>hair looks like wig =gay
They made Leia a man/troony.
It’s funny how the way shills defend widespread censorship in videogames is almost identical to how trannies defend their mycelium into every facet of media and their predation on children
>X will never happen, stop being so paranoid
>Give me one example of X happening
>So X happened once, big deal
>How is X personally effecting you?
>So what if X happens? Why do you care?
It's just a fricking lego dude. You really need to be able to jack off to a fricking lego? Seriously, you need to get help.
Yeah but consider Bionicle porn.
Yeah buddy
Still no refute to this, lol
>ESL moron addicted to porn desperately trying to justify why he needs this dumb shit in a kid's game.
>C-coomer!
Nah. Just hate censorship. Simple as. Now go back to leftypol before I drag your ass through sawblades neovegana first
>zoomers get mad at simple questions and have a panic attack #5271638
>out of arguments and now it's time for passive-aggressive "ironic" posting like any redditor does
Pottery.
>*yawn*
Is anyone else noticing the typical troon pattern in these responses or is it just me? Are we getting raided again?
>we
come on Black person, but yes, it's summer so all the kids and troons have free time to raid Ganker since it has shit for moderation.
>come on Black person
Hey, I'm not narcissistic or schizo enough to claim this is my board
You clearly did that to appear like you're a part of this group when you're not.
>He thinks lego games are marketted towards the 30+ year olds to watched the movies on release.
You're truly fricking moronic.
Lego games are clearly dumbed down shit for kids to get into the series with.
More like you realized I just shit down your throat, owned.
> More like you realized I just shit down your throat, owned.
Uh oh, looks like you projected too hard and now your trying to backpedal. Want me to post my hand and ring anon? Go on, don’t be shy, share with the class on how you are supposedly some superman and we’re all peons, tell us about what you do for a living, how much money you have, how educated you are, what your relationships is, etc. should be easy since you’re so superior to us, right?
Oh, and you still didn’t argue the point. Why is it that a generation raised on Leia’s cleavage was perfectly fine but now it’s a problem? Answer anon.
>You clearly did that to appear like you're a part of this group when you're not.
And how can you prove that?
>You're truly fricking moronic.
>Lego games are clearly dumbed down shit for kids to get into the series with.
yeah, i'm sure the dozens of thousands of people who bought the game on Steam are little kids
fricking moron
donut worry mein Black person, homosexuals like him will frick off by august when they'll need to e-beg on twatter again.
>Because star wars marketted towards adults and Lego doesn't?
"star wars" "marketed towards adults"
who do you think the game is marketed to, moron? people who watched the movies
> I like how you had to say "My generation" and not "I" because you realize you're a maladjusted piece of trash arguing for cleavage in a lego game.
Lmao, no I was trying to indicate that it was brainwashing children. As for myself I have a wife and I’d have children if it wasn’t for all the fricked shit going on like baby food shortages. Almost bough a house the other day but I’m trying to wait out the market. How about you anon? You want to tell me how your life is while arguing that cleavage is somehow going to make prepubescent children into degenerates?
>troonys invade video game spaces
>Lego gets owned by globohomo
>Act surprised modern video games suck
If Lego Star Wars is indeed a children's game, I don't care about this one.
i thought we already got the outrage over with 3 months ago
Its not like her actress had any breasts
So you pretty much can't prove it and you go with your basic b***h response. Good to know
>You're like those people that type smiley faces when they're seething.
you mean /qa/ gays? lol no, i actually laugh at funny shit, which is your silly attempts of manipulating this conversation and having it backfire terribly in the process because it is funny seeing the magic turning against the wizard.
What other demographic besides straight men has their sexuality repressed as much as men? This is a fricking lego. Gay and female hyper idealized sex models are rampant and encouraged, but anything resembling even a small amount of cleavage is heresy.
> So which is it dumbass? Cleavage or the whole breast? Or did you add the beast feeding bit because again, you lost the plot?
We’re talking about cleavage and you are equating it to dicks. Please point out where mean are walking around with their balls teasing out of their shorts every day, and show where that’s prevalent.
If my fricking sack was hanging out of my shorts I’d get arrested for public indecency. Women do not get arrested for fricking showing cleavage in public.
You're fricking weird dude.
You're equating breasts to dicks because you're moronic and gay, you're literally talking about children sucking dicks because you're addicted to porn.
More like I'm literally running out of characters because you're all
"PLEASE RESPOND TO ME" and get upset when I don't respond to people that want to namecall and have no arguments.
Dogshit argument, kys.
Good thing you're not in charge.
Okay, moron.
Oh he's doing that thing where he pretends my sarcasm was me agreeing with him because he's angry.
Ganker children so depserate.
STILL no b***hes?
>STILL no b***hes?
I can tell that got under your skin.
It's not about how it offends me it's about not sexualizing a game for literal children.
Are you learning impaired by any chance?
>Offended
There's that word again, you're the one assmad about a lego game and comparing real women in shit aimed at adults to shit in a kid's game.
Grow up.
But the people that agree with me are in charge so...
>I can tell that got under your skin.
Ain't getting me to say the P-word today, mein dear homosexual.
> But the people that agree with me are in charge so...
No, I’m pretty sure society disagrees that cleavage is porn. Again, go make a poll on any site right now and post results lmao
>It's not about how it offends me it's about not sexualizing a game for literal children.
you are extremely offended on behalf of the children, while children couldn't give two fricks about two lines indicating cleavage of a toy. dolls for little girls are more sexualized than the old lego games, are you throwing tantrums because of those too?
how should women be depicted in your opinion? like pic related? are you happy then?
>There's that word again, you're the one assmad about a lego game
No, I have never played a Lego game, I'm simply here because I found it interesting how crazy you are going over literally two lines on a Lego figure and claiming this is harmful sexualization that in some way degenerates children without any source to back that up.
>in some way degenerates children
do you know what actually degenerates children? hint: picrel
>Oh he's doing that thing where he pretends my sarcasm was me agreeing with him because he's angry.
Why are you ignoring the main point of the discussion, which is that cleavage is completely non-offensive to any rational human?
does pic related offend you in any way? could you explain how?
looks like a bootleg
read
no
> You're fricking weird dude.
You're equating breasts to dicks
YOU did that by saying cleavage is porn lmfao. It isn’t. If it was pornographic in nature, women would get arrested for it for public indecency. You literally can’t argue it’s porn
>Ganker children so depserate.
>STILL no b***hes?
Now I'm convinced it's a woman. Are you that one weird chick with the reverse humiliation fetish that rears its ugly head every now and then just to shlick?
*"woman"
My post got ignored. I'm 95% sure it's her. Stop projecting your gay fetish onto hapless anons. There's better boards for this
that Black person ignores certain posts that he knows he can't reply without seeing utterly assblasted even if it's some "irony dabbing", what i find funny is the Black person saying "i win" on a basket weaving mongolian forum, does anyone have that picture where a moron could pick from a fricktillion sites, including reddit which is like on the 1st place but picks Ganker which is like on 4000th place or something to go around and post garbage?
> Good thing you're not in charge
Yea, and you aren’t either, society is. Try taking a poll anywhere and ask if cleavage is porn, get back to me on that lmao
> More like I'm literally running out of characters because you're all
"PLEASE RESPOND TO ME" and get upset when I don't respond to people that want to namecall and have no arguments.
I haven’t been namecalling at all and you keep trying to dismiss me and refuse to answer any question I pose.
You’re just wrong anon. And you can’t handle that so you protect your ego with ebin dismissals while praying that we won’t continue rubbing your nose in it. I bet you keep glancing nervously at the post count because you want the thread to be over.
You keep going on about ego but you're desperate for my attention?
Doesn't matter what society thinks, besides, you're clearly framing the argument in a certain way
Why don't we ask if we should change the slave costume in a kid's show version of star wars and see how many people suddenly would think you're a moron.
>Keeps talking about being offended
>Posts picture of a burqa
Good way to ensure I don't read your porn obsessed drivel.
You're not edgy for jerking off dumbass.
>Good way to ensure I don't read your porn obsessed drivel.
Why are you ignoring the entire post? Why are you offended by 2 lines on a Lego figurine? Why do you claim this is harming children?
>Why touch cleavage? It exists IRL
>"NOOOOOOOO GAY KISSES I'M MELTING"
>Can't win the argument
>Reductio ad absurdum
Another win in my pocket.
You morons are giving out Ws like candy.
Didn't ask and you're reaching.
Another W
> Didn't ask and you're reaching. Another W
You admitted you were wrong indirectly and now you’re spinning it as a win lmfao. You are objectively wrong that cleavage is porn and you just admitted that your delusions goes against societal opinion.
You lost kid.
That's funny where you ignored the part about what people would say about the slave costume in a kid's show.
I like how you also ignored the gay kisses.
Bad cuz mad.
Mad cuz bad.
>I like how you also ignored the gay kisses.
Are you implying that I don't like gay kisses, and that means that you are allowed to lie about cleavage being porn and harming children?
If so, what if I don't give a frick about gay kisses? Would that mean you rethink your position on cleavage and accepting it as a completely normal thing?
You're spending more time saving images of barbie dolls than actually forming a coherent argument, dumbass.
If you had a point it wouldn't take more than a few words to explain.
I ask you once again: why are you so offended by cleavage that you start lying about it harming children? Why are you offended by two lines on a plastic toy to a point where you go crazy over hours in a Ganker thread?
Also, why do you keep dodging these questions? What makes you so afraid to answer them?
No one's lying about anything moron, you're clearly too stupid to understand how the entertainment industry works when it comes to children or the regulations surrounding it
If breasts are so bad, why aren't we requiring that women need to have breast reduction surgery until they're flat as a board?
What if a kid sees their rack and gets perverted, sinful ideas?
>No one's lying about anything moron
Post source please on how cleavage affects children's development. I'm genuinely interested to learn more.
Cleavage means breasts.
breasts means milkies.
Milkies means children have source of nourishment in early childhood.
Source of nourishment in early childhood means growth.
Growth is good.
That means cleavage is good.
Source: trust me bro
>What makes you so afraid to answer them?
being out of arguments and admitting to being wrong.
classic redditor move.
> That's funny where you ignored the part about what people would say about the slave costume in a kid's show.
Removing cleavage doesn’t make it not a slave outfit lmfao, infact that’s even more damning to your point
Changing the costume takes more effort for a game, idiot.
It's like you're too stupid to even understand what I'm saying and you're trying as hard as you can to split hairs because your porn addiction has consumed you.
I've literally been like 1 of like 2-3 people arguing this, if anything you coomers are clearly talking to each other offsite because you say the same exact shit when you get angry
"WHY ARE YOU OFFENDED"
"PURITAN"
"MORAL PURITAN!!"
"PRUDE"
You homosexuals say the same shit
> Changing the costume takes more effort for a game, idiot.
Ok, then if they changed the cleavage to “save the children” then why not the slave outfit? Hm? You can’t have this both ways anon.
>Why didn't they model a different outfit entirely
I know for a fact you are the same guy b***hing about wasted effort for png deletions too, but since I can't see IPs on posts you're squirm out of it, a shame.
Here it is again "Le christian waaaaaaah muh porn"
>Seeing breasts means it should be in children focused media
More porn addiction.
>More porn addiction.
Let's calm down here a bit. Are you addicted to porn because you saw Star Wars as a kid? Or are you addicted to porn because you saw a Lego figurine with cleavage? Just to clarify, mate.
>Specifically looked up "Sexy leia costume"
>Is asshurt when people bring up his affliction
no, I just googled slave leia custome. is this the reason you are so mad about cleavage on children's toys? you got addicted to porn through it?
>anon gets addicted to porn via sexy toys
>doesn’t want others to end up like him
>this is a bad thing
???
>anon gets addicted to porn via sexy toys
that's what I want to know. did he play with dolls as a kid and start to jerk off to them?
I'm addicted to porn because I got in a fender bender and after exchanging insurance info asked the girl on a date and fricked her.
It was like a porno and it made me realize I could live life like a porno in the real if I wanted.
You're the one insinuating that breasts have no place in a child's life.
Explain why real life breasts that countless children will see every day in their life are okay.
Children don't see breasts every day.
If they have a mother, which is typically the case even in a single-parent life, they absolutely goddamn do.
Sure, they're clothed, but they're still there. Noticeable lumps on the female body that are absent from the male body.
I have a mother, I haven't seen her breasts once outside of breastfeeding, and I don't have conscious memory of that.
What type of household were you in? It sounds like you were sexually abused.
Do you have no concept of object permanence? Even if they're clothed, THE BREASTS ARE STILL THERE.
THEY'RE LUMPS THAT STICK OUT AND ADD A NOTABLE SHAPE TO THE FEMALE BODY EVEN WHEN CLOTHED THAT IS NOT THERE ON THE MALE BODY.
You were 100% abused by a relative. I don't want to hear your cope any further, normal minds don't think about their relatives sexually.
Frick off gay pedophile.
You STILL haven't answered the question of why real life breasts that "aren't sexual" are okay, but fictional breasts that ALSO "aren't sexual" are not.
Look dude, I told you I am not going to be putting up with your molested reasoning any longer. I don't care that you were molested, I don't care that you normalized and internalized it.
I do care that you are choosing to continue the cycle of abuse by voicing your acceptance of what happened to you. You're mindbroken and I'm not going to reason with someone that got put in a position to be sexually abused by a relative and decided they liked it.
Do not reply to me. You repulse me.
Answer the question and stop projecting.
Tick tock, we're about to fall right off into pruning.
>Do not reply to me
>reply
Ohhhhhhhh...
Hustbant...
Prease...
You spend so many time shitpost we on page 10...
frickin lol
Farewell coomers and that one anon who said cleavage was porn
Strange you magically ignored this
Actually not strange, you're clearly angry as frick and doing it on purpose for a "Win"
See
You keep calling everyone a gay pedophile but you’re the one who doesn’t want to see breasts and apparently never got an erection as a kid.
Really makes you think.
> I've literally been like 1 of like 2-3 people arguing this,
Like 6 people have been shitting on you. You don’t have to be a coomer to note that it’s pointless censorship, you seem to be the one mad about it and think that cleavage is porn somehow
>The 6 people arguing the same shit, throwing the same baseless insults and making the same faulty arguments aren't the discord raiders.
Man coomers are fricking delusional.
Honestly if all you gays killed yourselves it'd be a net positive.
More like 6 people kept telling you your moronic and not letting you brush it off so you pretended to ebinly own them with gay little dismissals because your fragile ego can’t handle being wrong.
Anon, you said cleavage was porn. I forced you over many posts to admit that society disagrees with you and you screamed that society doesn’t matter. Serious question, when’s the last time you admitted you were wrong on anything? Do you think you are always right?
But don’t worry Anon, we’re almost done bullying you, the thread is about to autosage.
6 stupid people agreeing with each other does not make them correct.
You have yet to include a single reason for why they need to add sexualized shit to a children's game other than "It's natuwal" and when the idea of gay shit is brought up you suddenly shift around and start talking about breasts and sucking dicks being the same thing.
6 people are a lot better compared to a single narcissist. Just saying
Like I said before, if this was facebook or some gay shit you 6 homosexuals would be shitting your pants when you got ratio'd.
Silent majority is with me, that's why we win, that's why we control everything.
Shit on pussy.
Especially triggered because you know I'm right.
Because deleting a png is 5 seconds worth of work and conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
Stop talking about shit you don't know anything about.
>Especially triggered because you know I'm right.
lol
Bro, I'll chalk this up to the mind altering medications you're on and we can move past this.
>ratio'd
Twitter troony confirmed
have a nice day
>if this was facebook or some gay shit
MY FACEBOOK POST GOT DELETED
LITERALLY
1984
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
> Because deleting a png is 5 seconds worth of work and conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
And why did you not say this instead of going on some massive tirade about how cleavage was porn and they’re saving duh chillens?
Bitchmade liddle babby
>silent majority is with me
>we control everything
>implying
Unironically you and what army? All I see is a single sperg throwing a tantrum about people questioning the removal lego cleavage
>conforms to the ratings board
Wasn't LEGO always E rated, even when it had cleavage?
> conforms to the ratings board, dumbass.
I really don’t think cleavage would make the game not E10
>Silent majority is with me, that's why we win
oh, you are a leftoid on a crusade to protect the children, that explains a lot lmao
Nick Bates
Thaddeus McMicheal
Vaush.
You're a porn addicted pedo just like them
That image is only ever used by people that need to point fingers when they're rightfully accused of wanting to frick children
sorry pedo, the gig is up. it's a well-known fact that hardcore pedophile will rally for all sorts of pretend causes like censoring cleavage from toys to make them look less guilty.
>I-if this was facebook everyone would agree with me!
Maybe you should've stayed there.
The argument is why change a png when nothing is wrong with it. You keep equating cleavage to porn, I point out that it’s not something like dicks or veganas which would be actual porn, then you deflect.
Cleavage isn’t porn. You are wrong. Society says you’re wrong.
that was fricking glorious anon, i'm sure the homosexual and his friends will try that shit tomorrow as well.
they hate Ganker so much they always keep coming back for no reason rather than just forgetting about it and going on with their lives, i simply cannot understand such homosexualry, then again i'm not a gay so...
>Like 6 people have been shitting on you.
I can easily tell you it's two people shitting on the homosexual, the others are simply reinforcing their argument as to why it's a necessary change even though the homosexual started by saying it was removing something unnecessary in the first place and calling people coomers. now he's doubling down on calling people coomers because he can't argue even though one of the anons is reiterating the fact that the change was still useless and that this Black person is pretending to take it too personally to count "wins" by getting (you)s:
>I can easily tell you it's two people shitting on the homosexual
"N-no it's only 2 people, those 10+ reply posts are all 2 people"
How are you homosexuals so aggressive and so ready to play the victim at the same time?
it's two really, me and me using chrome browser.
>Why touch cleavage? It exists IRL
Yeah, why is it offensive to you to a point were you go crazy for over an hour in a thread about it? It must really touch a nerve, and I'm simply interested why.
Is pic related driving you insane too? It's a doll for kids, do you get horny from looking at it?
lmao that's not even reductio ad absurdum you fricking moronio
put me in your homosexual discord raid screencap.
>"society agrees with me"
>no it doesn't
>"doesn't matter what society thinks"
that'll be one (you) please
> Doesn't matter what society thinks
So in other words you know you are wrong about your claim that cleavage is porn but won’t admit to that. And no, society is the only thing that matters, your self righteous crusade does not matter.
When are the lib rool commie antifa facist going to stop taking EVERYTHING that's precious to me?!?!?!?
Burka porn is one of my fetishes so I don't mind
A man of culture
> When I type *yawn* I'm pointing out-
You’re pointing out that you have no argument and you are trying to have an ebin dismissal so that you can get out of arguing against it. Because you know you’re wrong but your fragile ego can’t handle that.
everyone knows that bro, it's just funny seeing the homosexual trying to dance around it, good thread thanks to the homosexual moron tripping over his own shit.
Fair point
>So why is a topless woman considered nudity and a topless man isn't?
Because certain countries deemed it so. It’s not like that all over the world y’know, the government isn’t always right lol.
Cleavage isn’t porn lmao
Eh, it's fine
>Ganker flips its shit over trannies and people injecting their fetishes into vidya all the time
>NOOOO NOT MY LEGO LEIA CLEAVAGEARINO
Since when are normal cleavages a fetish?
>Slave outfit
>Normal cleavage.
Why are coomers so disingenuous about everything bros?
why are you offended by a woman wearing an outfit from a movie? what exactly is the problem?
Is that a man
no idea, I just googled slave leia cosplay
>slave outfit
>normal
Yes.
>disingenous
No. Go back to whatever parish you came from
>coomer is so far gone he thinks a slave fetish is normal
Repent, and you may still find salvation
>slave fetish
Black person Return of the jedi is a kid-appropriate movie. Enough with your virtue signalling
>slavery
>toys
>women
All fine are their own, but combine them together and you get some disgusting shit
>Awesome argument that can't be taken another way
thanks for admitting that you are objectively wrong about your poor comparison. it takes real courage to admit a mistake like that.
now can we go back to the core of the argument, which is that cleavage is a completely non-offensive thing to rational humans?
>Ganker has gotten to the point where they are crying over censored lego blocks
The absolute state.
>first they came for the anime games, and I did not care because I don't play anime games
>then they came for the lego games, and I did not care because I don't play lego games
etc. etc. etc.
>Anime games
>censored
Thank god I'm not a snoy.
Is it me or do the people who seethe about the removal of cleavage in a children's game more often than not the same people who seethe about a 0.5 second same-sex kiss in Lightyear?
It's the same group realizing they are dying out and no content catering to them will be sold anymore
The people who seethe at the removal of cleavage from a kid’s toy are the same people who argue against said removal because “who cares about the kids, the kids don’t care”, all while being the living result of the decades-old mistake some LEGO designer made when making a Star Wars set (read: degenerate coomer)
>implying I watch contemporary movies that suck ass in general
this whole talk seems to be more about censorship than it being about coomer shit, one anon even brought up the fact hat "if it was useless, why change it?" prompting "gotcha" wording by raiding leftygays as to why it was changed in the first place, there is one leftyhomosexual tripping over his own shit in this very thread and he gets assmad about it every time other anons point it out, i won't multiquote him because that's moronic shit but have one of his posts:
people just reinforced the same points over and over until he called people inflexible and "out of arguments" when in true it's him that cannot argue in favor of a "useless change" without offending the others or implying there will be coomer shit on it.
plus someone already mentioned leftyBlack person's intellectual dishonesty and how they will try to manipulate the conversation around:
which the assblasted homosexual is still trying to do by the by.
That's ethnic dancer garment leia to you, racist.
Frick Black folk, jannies and trannies
cope
Is this clown world?
Why does anyone care about this?
Why change it if it isn’t important?
>the kids-
My entire generation had toys of Leia’s cleavage and saw it in the movies and they aren’t degenerate freak shows. Again, why change it?
They redesign the minifigs when they make new sets. The game just uses the latest one
>they aren’t degenerate freak shows
Lol
>Why change it if it isn't important?
I don't know, I don't care, this is like the peak non-issue for you gays to start screeching censorship about.
>First they came for our Lego slave leia, and I did nothing for I was blasting rope to Clone Wars Padme instead.
Is your life so easy that you need to invent this hardship? 2NNNA
Anon is simply asking questions and you gays keep getting mad about it. Of course nobody here cares about Lego breasts, but to pretend censorship isn’t censorship or that it’s “not important” is a dangerous mindset. It’s clearly important if they changed it and the fact that you gays get so mad about this simple observation speaks volumes.
Who's more moronic
>The guy who modeled that texture
>The guy complaining they removed it
>The guy who asked to remove it
Us, for getting a thread to autosage about it
I can tell you who's the smartest one.
>the guy who didn't buy the game
>guy who modeled
Just doing his job
>guy who requested the change
Just wants a “safer” product to sell more
>guy who complains
Schizo who thinks the entire world is after him and any change in something he’s used to is an attempt on his life and culture
>you
A homosexual leftypolite who thinks anything even attractive is porn and does his best (and fails) to moralgay in a desparate attempt to get anyone with more than a single braincell to agree with him, and he deserves to be beaten and left in a ditch
funny because he had to call for friends on his discord server to agree with him.
gave up didn'tcha? we accept your concession.
Yeah see you’re the schizo. Assuming I’m a leftist, thinking I deserve to be put down, etc. Take your meds friend. LEGO Brand just wants more money with less potential controversy
I never said, "put down", you can survive a beating unless you're a twig
Also, even if you're not a leftist, christisraelite puritans are no better
>doesn’t deny being a schizo
Lol
>never denied my arguement and resorts to "lol ur schizo tho"
See,it can go both ways That your only arguement? We're all schizos here, and you're no different
IS THAT A PAIR OF breasts!?! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS IS LITERAL PORNOGRAPHY AND NOT AT ALL FROM A PG RATED MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
NOOOOO THIS ISN'T POSSIBLE ALLAH SAVE MEEEEE
>it's not harmful at all, now let your kids jerk off to it bigot...
How fricking moronic must people be to demand censoring fricking LEGO boobs
Exactly as moronic as the people demanding they be added back
Cleaves are sexist.
>half the thread supports pic related
Purchase a subscription to World of Warcraft today! We protect the morals of our young minds! Nothing but good wholesome delicious fun!
>thread about lego breasts
>ctrl f troony
And almost all of it is the guy trying to argue that cleavage is porn lmao
Aren't you the one that shifted the argument to that goalpost moron?
Oh of course, that's why your brought up your own point again.
I know you'll be seething about me for months.
>I know you'll be seething about me for months.
lol
>I know you'll be seething about me for months.
Uh, no? You were the one that claimed that they should remove the cleavage because it was porn and I just keep telling you it’s not, to the point that you claimed that everyone that disagrees with you (the vast majority) “doesn’t matter”.
Cleavage isn’t porn lmao
he's still trying it, good thread because he's still on copium trying too hard to say it's coomer shit and failing terribly.
funny seeing how he got tired of his "cult" facade and just embraced the "haha i win by being moronic on purpose" act.
it's like the Black person's brain literally melt down the more and more he tried to prove he wasn't wrong, i'm glad anon literally pointed it out:
>kids used to see playboy mags, why not my gay furry porn, bigot
another 500 posts for lego breasts
Under socialism, lego leia would have breasts
>SEETHING hanging on my every word.
>You'll definitely think about me when you get ED and have a ton of free time.
lol
>Under 20 second reply
Rent fricking free.
My posts are concise, you're copying me because I'm the most successful man in the room
Can't wait to see you seethe in the next coomer cope thread.
No, you drew that conclusion because you're a fricking moron and you keep saying it (Like dunkey's wife) because you're angry you couldn't win on a single point against me.
>counting reply timer
>rent free
oh no no no no.
Anon you literally fricking said this.
>Ctrl+f "Cleavage is porn"
You're the first result
Hmm
KEK
>Why is something natural like cleavage bad but little Timmy can shoot someone in the head
Then you respond:
>Why is fictional violence ok but porn is bad
Go on anon, what the FRICK did you mean by this? What were you implying, you disingenuous little shit?
>Refer to actual porn vs violence
>"WHOA DUDE HE MEANT CLEAVAGE"
So you were desperate for a win, typical tricks.
You’re posting long winded drivel because you’re angry.
>You're still craving my attention.
> I did, you complete fricking moron, you were too busy looking up leia porn and barbie dolls to fricking read.
No, you said because cleavage was porn lmao
he still says it but never explains why.
like dude just answer the fricking question and stop dodging it, it's a question, not a punch.
He can’t stand being wrong, it hurts him
>You're still craving my attention
Says the moron replying to everyone who even dares question your shit opinions
Go back, it'll be better for you this way
> Varying factors due to the whole outfit, read above
But then why didn’t they change the entire outfit then? You said they were too lazy to do this but now you’re claiming they removed cleavage for a rating? You can’t have this both ways. If they were doing it for a rating than why wouldn’t they change everything?
Because it's easier to delete a fricking texture png, jesus christ dude keep up
But if the slave outfit is going to make the rating go up regardless and you aren’t changing that, why bother changing the cleavage in that case?
You need to “keep up” anon. You can’t have this both ways.
>i won in real life
Yet here you are, begging for crumbs of attention from internet randos
what makes a Black person go into a braid-making siri-lankan forum just to get other people's attention by being a moron and dodging questions while insulting others?
Lack of narcissistic fuel. He probably came here to fight the windmills normies and lefties have built up to make himself feel better
I can hear you fat morons hyperventilating.
>"O-other fat morons agree with me! I must be right"
I've already won on this issue, I'm merely trying to educate you but you're so far gone you make up your own arguments and goalposts based on the twisted interpretation of things I posted.
TL;DR
Coomers got absolutely raped and desperately want the last word, they can have it.
Cope with the fact I'm stronger and smarter than all of you.
Cope that you wanted this so bad you raged until bump limit.
Cope that you'll never feel the touch of a woman.
And you cope that you'll never be a woman
Kek you got absolutely fricked and now you’re running away because the thread is autosaging and you can’t keep up with everyone shitting on you.
not looking very strong if a cleavage is enough to trigger you into an hours long sperging out on Ganker
>dropped the facade
>still refusing to answer the questions
>doubled down on the moronation
>claim to have won after being assraped by 4 anons that simply made a question
You will never amount to anyone important in your life for all the preaching for "justice" you do.
You're a cog in the machine and one that can be replaced with the snap of a finger, and the corporations and China don't even have to acknowledge you exist to do so.
You're a statistic that benefits them. Nothing more.
>twisted
You literally said cleavage was porn and worse than kids shooting fictional characters in the head lmfao
I sincerely hope this is bait and your not actually this moronic.
it is baitto, they aren't original and always pull the same shit every summer.
>says we can have last word
Still baaaaaaaaawing
You lost, get over it
>Whoa discord raiders!
Conveniently ignores the multiple people replying the same exact shit because they're addicted to porn like him
Coomcels SEETHING
Dilate
If you guys really cared about sex in video games, you would buy the fricking plethora of H-games that Japan releases instead of complaining about a childrens star wars autism simulator texture.