Because they like them. Have you ever considered that someone might like a game? I know that's crazy but just sit on it a while, trust me it's legit man.
They're great games, I could imagine that someone would hate them if they rigidly stuck to using Keyboard and Mouse to play their games because it just doesn't play like modern games or like any other games really but if you can get past that they're good fun.
Because they like them. Have you ever considered that someone might like a game? I know that's crazy but just sit on it a while, trust me it's legit man.
Because the moment controls aren't instantly familiar people get lost. Essentially no one wants to LEARN anything new.
Who let zoomers to exist? And who allowed zoomers to work at ign? I hope the THQ Nordic should sue ign for slander and its zooner horde
What made IGN popular in the early days, before gametrailers was a thing, was they were one of the few sites where you could just straight up download trailers and b-roll, although there was 5-a-day cap.
Inability to pick up items? The frick?
Gothic was great, way better than oblivion and other slop that was out at the time.
Gothic 3 was a little unfinished but still a great game.
Arcania is not Gothic.
looking at youtube reviews like mandalore makes the game seem absolutely void of any interest
the graphics are shit
the gameplay and controls are behind the time, back when it was released
they dont even recommend finishing the game
In their defence, the game itself doesn't tell you how exactly the controls work. I remember having to figure them out on my own as I didn't have a manual with my copy. I still love Gothic, but I appreciate that playing it was often a test of patience with the frequent crashes
>Archolos
How moronic am I for not realizing who Marvin really is until the very end? But I'm kinda glad I didn't know. It's the only truly bad thing about Archolos.
They are IGN
>reviewer cannot grasp basic controls
BLYAT
None, they are right
What's your problem?
>Broken piece of shit game, AA :]
>Broken piece of shit game, Bethesda 🙁
>shit game gets bad score
What is the problem?
Reminder that most people of Eastern Europe are more likely to know what Gothic is than any Nintendo product.
deserved
Its amazing how many people suck off these terrible games just cause...why exactly?
But enough about Morrowind
I played Morrowind after Oblivion and Skyrim and loved it more than them (though admittedly after I applied the 100% hit mod to make it less annoying)
Polack autism
Because they like them. Have you ever considered that someone might like a game? I know that's crazy but just sit on it a while, trust me it's legit man.
It is also possible to like games that are not great.
Because the moment controls aren't instantly familiar people get lost. Essentially no one wants to LEARN anything new.
They're great games, I could imagine that someone would hate them if they rigidly stuck to using Keyboard and Mouse to play their games because it just doesn't play like modern games or like any other games really but if you can get past that they're good fun.
Who let zoomers to exist? And who allowed zoomers to work at ign? I hope the THQ Nordic should sue ign for slander and its zooner horde
I can imagine this fricker getting raped by Bloodflies.
what is ign's biggest claim to fame - easily bought scores or moronic hot takes?
What made IGN popular in the early days, before gametrailers was a thing, was they were one of the few sites where you could just straight up download trailers and b-roll, although there was 5-a-day cap.
The only reviews I trust are from autists. Ign is autism free unfortunately
Isn't it a Stalker SoC thing where it's obviously a good game but at launch impossible to give a good score because of how fricked it is
Inability to pick up items? The frick?
Gothic was great, way better than oblivion and other slop that was out at the time.
Gothic 3 was a little unfinished but still a great game.
Arcania is not Gothic.
My only guess is that maybe the game was bugged on launch or something?
>1.9
kek
What's the lowest score they've given?
The Day Before got IGN to give their lowest score ever. A 1.
Are ignkeks trolling good us today bros?
Your game was shit
Morrowind was a lot better
nice bait, slopconsumer
One of the N64 Hockey games they gave a zero because it was literally the same game as a Wayne Gretzky Hockey game except for the change in License.
https://www.ign.com/articles/1998/01/01/olympic-hockey-nagano-98
Now they just give all the pro sports games that copy paste each year a regular score right?
looking at youtube reviews like mandalore makes the game seem absolutely void of any interest
the graphics are shit
the gameplay and controls are behind the time, back when it was released
they dont even recommend finishing the game
First Gothic? Deserved. It was trash. Gothic 2 is where the cream is.
>inability to pick up items
???
In their defence, the game itself doesn't tell you how exactly the controls work. I remember having to figure them out on my own as I didn't have a manual with my copy. I still love Gothic, but I appreciate that playing it was often a test of patience with the frequent crashes
Risen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothic
Gothic 1 > Gothic 2 = Archolos > Risen > Gothic 3 > My ass >>> Risen 2 >>>>>>>>> Risen 3
>Archolos
How moronic am I for not realizing who Marvin really is until the very end? But I'm kinda glad I didn't know. It's the only truly bad thing about Archolos.
Wait who is he? I'm even more moronic then
Are they joking? They do understand it's a port of an old game? Or theyre trolling us?
Ganker is getting stupider by the day, how are you people so gullible?
have you considered that possibly the game was completely fricking broken?
How do you know it's a vtuber and not a generic anime pic?