Starfield is a chore to play. Everything is a loading screen that usually requires you to go through a menu. >space travel >entering a building >picking a planet to land
Those fricking loading screens!
And in between that is some decent gunplay.
And lots and lots of talking from unlikeable NPCs.
Why do trade terminals only have 5k credits? How dumb is that.
>Starfield is a chore to play.
You forgot the part where Starfield has one of the most mindnumbing writing ever. The writers for Starfield should be fired. They make the writing in Mass Effect look like a masterpiece.
Hey, hey, hey, don't compare Bethesda to Bioware. Bioware writing is cliche, sure, but the companions are always very likeable and charming and the story is always well-told.
On the other hand, I am convinced that Bethesda writers aren't humans but reptilians who only now are trying to get a sense of how human interactions work. Because holy shit, the writing feels artificial.
>I-it’s selling a bazillion copies, who cares if it’s at 40% off!!!
kek, they are never making their money back from this blunder, gonna be fun watching these polacks beg for more ESG shekels before going under for good
Why would anyone pay for Cyberpunk 2.0 when they can pay more money for the DLC which includes 2.0? Unless of course that Cyberpunk 2.0 at number 1 is simply ppl re-installing the game they already bought & updating it?
>Why would anyone pay for Cyberpunk 2.0 when they can pay more money for the DLC which includes 2.0?
What? You need the base game to play the expansion.
>Mogged
It's not selling to new costumers, it's just old ones trying the new update.
*cough*
You know that this year is a bad year (one of the weakest year) for gaming, when dlc for 3-year-old game dominates the chart
I still have no idea why anyone cares about steam numbers on a game that is primarily played through gay pass. Does anyone here even know a single person who purchased it? I have like 9 people in discord playing it rn and every single one through gay pass. Who would spend $70 on this shit to play thru steam ?
who even asked for 1000 planets to land on? once you've seen a dozen, you've seen them all. the same 10 dungeons and 10 traits everywhere, the same 20 plants on every habitable planet and the same 20 animals given different roles (with fish and flying animals being interchangeable for some reason).
970 of those planets could have been just an info panel. Mass Effect and Freelancer did that, and nobody complained. then the remaining 30 could be handcrafted to an extent and have some identity.
I still have no idea why anyone cares about steam numbers on a game that is primarily played through gay pass. Does anyone here even know a single person who purchased it? I have like 9 people in discord playing it rn and every single one through gay pass. Who would spend $70 on this shit to play thru steam ?
Ganker has always been a miserable place but especially lately with all the decent single player shit we have. Bg3 / starfield / cyberpunk 2.0 have been great in their own ways and I've been having more fun playing single player games for the last few months, it's been great.
When I do play multi-player games it's pretty much hunt showdown or northgard, which are also still getting updates and play great with friends. Maybe you're all miserable bastards but gaming is in a good spot rn
You can start by not being a dumb Black person and putting things together in the same basket that they don't belong to
>decent games, and arguably great in their own right
BG3 and Cyberpunk
>mid overhyped game that falls short of every standard
Starfield
The sooner people like you stop shoving Starfield where it doesn't belong, the sooner shitposts die down.
>starfield >great
Pick only one you dumb gay. That game is a travesry.
See what I mean? Miserable bastards. You can't even say "I'm having fun!" Without half the losers with no friends on here b***hing about people having fun. I hope you all go outside for a walk and then play and talk about games yoy enjoy instead of spending half your day being miserable bastards and whining about people having fun instead
Starfield is a chore to play. Everything is a loading screen that usually requires you to go through a menu.
>space travel
>entering a building
>picking a planet to land
Those fricking loading screens!
And in between that is some decent gunplay.
And lots and lots of talking from unlikeable NPCs.
Why do trade terminals only have 5k credits? How dumb is that.
>Starfield is a chore to play.
You forgot the part where Starfield has one of the most mindnumbing writing ever. The writers for Starfield should be fired. They make the writing in Mass Effect look like a masterpiece.
Hey, hey, hey, don't compare Bethesda to Bioware. Bioware writing is cliche, sure, but the companions are always very likeable and charming and the story is always well-told.
On the other hand, I am convinced that Bethesda writers aren't humans but reptilians who only now are trying to get a sense of how human interactions work. Because holy shit, the writing feels artificial.
Doesn't Steam make much less money than even Nintendo from this shit? Why are you guys so obssessed with their numbers?
>Cyberpunk has just mogged BG3
Good for them. They deserve it.
>Mogged
It's not selling to new costumers, it's just old ones trying the new update.
moron
It's the most played you illeterate moron.
*cough*
>I-it’s selling a bazillion copies, who cares if it’s at 40% off!!!
kek, they are never making their money back from this blunder, gonna be fun watching these polacks beg for more ESG shekels before going under for good
top sellers are ordered by revenue, including microtransactions
it's literally destroying f2p beasts
>I-it’s by revenue!!
>Because… because it just is, okay?!??
Yikes, the wheels are really coming off here…
Why would anyone pay for Cyberpunk 2.0 when they can pay more money for the DLC which includes 2.0? Unless of course that Cyberpunk 2.0 at number 1 is simply ppl re-installing the game they already bought & updating it?
>Why would anyone pay for Cyberpunk 2.0 when they can pay more money for the DLC which includes 2.0?
What? You need the base game to play the expansion.
>An FPS is selling better than a super niche CRPG.. wow amazing,
Yet despite BG3 being such a niche game it selling so well speaks massively how good it is.
What does gaypass post have to do with ur image
After 2 months of straight domination, he no longer minds.
Appropriate that you are using Witcher pic because unlike Cyberslop, BG3 is actually going to take GOTY.
>Day 1 of release vs Day 55
who even asked for 1000 planets to land on? once you've seen a dozen, you've seen them all. the same 10 dungeons and 10 traits everywhere, the same 20 plants on every habitable planet and the same 20 animals given different roles (with fish and flying animals being interchangeable for some reason).
970 of those planets could have been just an info panel. Mass Effect and Freelancer did that, and nobody complained. then the remaining 30 could be handcrafted to an extent and have some identity.
>970 of those planets could have been just an info panel
but then they would scam fewer people into downloading the game
You know that this year is a bad year (one of the weakest year) for gaming, when dlc for 3-year-old game dominates the chart
I still have no idea why anyone cares about steam numbers on a game that is primarily played through gay pass. Does anyone here even know a single person who purchased it? I have like 9 people in discord playing it rn and every single one through gay pass. Who would spend $70 on this shit to play thru steam ?
lol
Oh no did u spend $70 on this game? At least have some self respect and pirate it
The only problem I have with Starfield is that everything is unlikeable. I just hate how bland it feels. It reminds me of work.
got it
Shartfield? I'll be playing it for the next 10 years.
im cooooountiiiing
>couldn't even beat bg3 on peak this soon after release
cdpunksisters...what do we do now...
Ganker has always been a miserable place but especially lately with all the decent single player shit we have. Bg3 / starfield / cyberpunk 2.0 have been great in their own ways and I've been having more fun playing single player games for the last few months, it's been great.
When I do play multi-player games it's pretty much hunt showdown or northgard, which are also still getting updates and play great with friends. Maybe you're all miserable bastards but gaming is in a good spot rn
>starfield
>great
Pick only one you dumb gay. That game is a travesry.
And yet it’s still better than EGSpunk in every single way. Sad!
>dog shit is better than horse shit!
See what I mean? Miserable bastards. You can't even say "I'm having fun!" Without half the losers with no friends on here b***hing about people having fun. I hope you all go outside for a walk and then play and talk about games yoy enjoy instead of spending half your day being miserable bastards and whining about people having fun instead
Yes I enjoy shitting on this game and its fans, and concerngays like you are just the cherry on top!
Therapy
Sent from my iPhone
>I can't be wittier than you so I'll just throw a random buzzword
>Therapy is a buzzword
>I'm witty because I enjoy shitting on things
Are you moronic?
You can start by not being a dumb Black person and putting things together in the same basket that they don't belong to
>decent games, and arguably great in their own right
BG3 and Cyberpunk
>mid overhyped game that falls short of every standard
Starfield
The sooner people like you stop shoving Starfield where it doesn't belong, the sooner shitposts die down.
BG3 and Cyberpunk are both great. Starfield is a shitshow fallout 4 DLC.
When did Ganker become so obsessed with player count and sales numbers? Itms always been there but never this bad
Autists can only understand the world through numbers so salesgays and playercounts are the prime metric of consolewar shitposters
This is impressive as frick. How did they gatekeep the game so well while selling millions?