>Starfield on Steam has hundreds of positive reviews, all either a dot or a single word, all from private profiles with the Starfield points profile theme
No trickery here for sure. Is Godtodd paying Shill bots to post positive reviews?
You can also buy hundreds of Steam accounts with only Starfield on them from sites like Kinguin or G2A?
Literally me.
The incredible thing about starfield fanboys and so many modern video game consumers is how well they've been conditioned.
These people, when met with critism for the product, begin to break down emotionally. Experiencing all sorts of mental distress and anger. It's as if these people are about to break into a panic attack. It's truly incredible.
Not only are they completely desperate to consume your product, they also feel immense levels of stress when other people refuse to consume your product.
They are the perfect consumer.
hey somebody warned me about this if i can recall
Keep sending those truth-salvos. Wake up and see what is happening. This is real and powerful. Look up Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963. Realize what is happening.
they must be actual bots I can't believe these are actual people
.
You forgot "cares more about metacritic scores and Steam player count than actually playing games".
>OH NO, THERE ARE REVIEW BOMBS!!!
>w-what do you mean fake positive reviews are review bombs too? I-It's my scammer right to manipulate into thinking this game is better than it actually is...
Really astounds me that people think shilling/bots can only work one way.
>bots
>not using chatgpt
these are probably the indian developers
The narrative they've spun around this game is actually incredible. Convincing your consumers that something mediocre is actually the second coming, subverting any rational perspective on the game. What would you even call that? It's not just plain old marketing, it's like a concentrated effort to pull wool over the player's eyes.
I wish it were mediocre. It was just bad.
I dotpost all the time
did they pull that username straight out of an xbox live database from like 2007
surely negative reviews are not similar right schizoanon?
didn't bethesda already do fake reviews back with fallout 76?
>Hundreds of people giving negative reviews with less than 2 hours played
>based fits my agenda
>Hundreds of people giving positive reviews but they aren’t writing paragraphs
>NOOO THIS DOESN'T FIT MY AGENDA
Starfield Derangement Syndrome
The problem is they won't take action against fake wordless positive reviews but will take action against detailed negative reviews
Steam tells you when the game was received for free.
So I don't think these are shills, cause they must have actually paid for the game
you can redeem keys and it doesn't display that
If it's from s key for example "received for free" is just s checkbox you can tick when adding it.
I dont think it works like that. No one would have thousands to give to steam like that to add a few hundred positive reviews. Right?
That said i should have probably left a negative review myself. The product ended up crashing on my PC. Thank god i refunded.
I dont think it does. That product released for free thing is something you input yourself. Its a little checkbox.
users pick to show that themselves if they want, even if they bought it
Before posting a review one can tick a box that says "Received product for free", One doesn't have to tick it even though you received the product for free.
>whaddya mean they astroturfed the hell out of the review system? this is some kind of conspiracy!!!
the /misc/ schizos are invading again
>anything i don't like is posted by a right wing nutjob
we are here to stay you dickless eunuch, deal with it.
like clockwork
go apply for the janny job if you don't like us. in the meantime cry some more.
sounds like a period of off-topic review that steam should remove
>see Ganker shitting on Starfield and obsessing over reviews
>I'm having fun, so I give the game a thumbs up and a . because I'm not about to write a book report
>now I'm a paid shill
OH NOOOOO
>starfield all time high 300k+
>x4:foundations all time high 15k
imagine being a game dev without 100 million to put into advertising
You're only supposed to read the negative reviews. They're the honest ones. Even if they're paid review bombs they still are more honest than positive reviews.
Motherfricker why is paying for review bombs of Starfield? Is it Larian again? Is Larian and their infinite money behind every gaming woe?
can't wait to read his schizo headcanon
Holy strawman
been scrolling through the reviews and it's definitely a bit sussy
there's a lot just like that pic. But steam reviews are always SHIT so who cares really