STARFIELD PERFORMANCE IS SHIT!

>you need a 13900k+4090 to play starfield at 1440p60fps ultra
>1080p60fps ultra needs a 5600x+6800 MINIMUM

It's OVER.

Your PC is NOT powerful enough to run starfield at 1440p60fps unless you spend $2000.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    not going to be a surprise for anyone except you, apparently.

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >you need a high end system to play a AAA game at a high resolution and at ultra settings
    WHAAAAAT????????????? NO WAYYYYYYY!!!!!!!

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Starfield
      >AAA
      shit unironically looks like a Fallout space overhaul mod

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        I bet someone could take just the assets from Nuka World's space area and turn that into a better Starfield. Hell I bet working on that shit was their inspiration for Starfield.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean it basically is

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >locked fps
    >oh no I had 1 frame dip in 5 minutes of gameplay

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's the PS5 performance like for Starfield?

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >6800 for 1080p 60fps
    what is it with every game coming out running like dogshit
    not only that but putting cards a tier below what they are meant for

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    STARFIELD CAN'T EVEN RUN AT 1080p60FPS ON A MODERN $1000 AM5 PC BUILD. IT'S OVER

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Link?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Link?

      IT'S FRICKING OVER https://youtu.be/UiIQpvpdXLc

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Any test with 5600/7600/12400/13600k?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      looks like cpu bottleneck

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Any test with 5600/7600/12400/13600k?

        EVEN A FRICKING $650 GPU WITH AN AM5 PROCESSOR CAN BARELY SCRAPE 70FPS ON STARFIELD AT 1440P MEDIUM SETTINGS ITS SO FRICKING OVER

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >7600x+6800xt which cost around $1300 to build can't run 60fps1440p
          Ummm Toddsister?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >AMD GFX cards in current year
          lol the state of you

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >shit tier CPU's
      what a useless benchmark

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        See

        [...]
        EVEN A FRICKING $650 GPU WITH AN AM5 PROCESSOR CAN BARELY SCRAPE 70FPS ON STARFIELD AT 1440P MEDIUM SETTINGS ITS SO FRICKING OVER

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        it does not matter because you would need top of the line specs for this game to even run well
        bethesda cannot even make their games run well

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you turn off the AMD shit FSR you get +100 fps

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      See

      STARFIELD CAN'T EVEN RUN AT 1080p60FPS ON A MODERN $1000 AM5 PC BUILD. IT'S OVER

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >6700xt can't reach 60fps on 1080p Ultra
    FRICK YOU

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    ultra settings are a meme

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    And they didnt add dlss of course lmao and its not on list of games releasing with fsr 3 lmao

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    no fricking quantum tunneling super computer on the the planet will run that choppy buggy fricking gamebryo engine without micro shits every 3 seconds

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    damn

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw 3080 ti and 5600x

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      what I got as well king we should b aight but it do look like we gon need a better CPU at some point.

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I KNEEL Shazam!

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    does it have denuvo? might explain the bad performance

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      you don't need denuvo to explain why this runs so poorly
      fallout 4 ran like shit as well

  16. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Game has stutter and runs like shit on Xbox too hahahaha what a shitshow

  17. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have 13900k/4090. This shit better run at 100+fps

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe at LOW/MEDIUM settings AHAHAHAHA.

      Or you can enjoy 4k45fps ultra with your new $3000 PC

  18. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Todd's masterpiece is too great, technology is playing catchup

  19. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    So I’ll be able to run it fine at max settings. Great

  20. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Your PC is NOT powerful enough to run starfield at 1440p60fps
    On ultra.
    On high it will.

  21. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    i play all my games in 1280x1024

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he plays games in anything but 320x240
      do you have a rtx 4090?

  22. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    SHITFIELD

  23. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >game looks like ass
    >runs like ass
    sigh modern games are so shit.

  24. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Welcome to the future of PC gaming anon

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Lumen and Nanite will save us from the evils of Ray Tracing and Path Tracing!
      >Turns out they are just as evil

  25. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >betheshit devs cant optimize their games
    we know
    modders will be forced to fix it

  26. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ultra
    A meme setting made up to just sell overpriced top of the line cards. I never go above High settings since its functionally the same but with better performance.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *