>Strong Pokémon. Weak Pokémon. That is only the selfish perception of people. Truly skilled Trainers should try to win with the Pokémon they love best.
Was she right?
>Strong Pokmon.
>Strong Pokémon. Weak Pokémon. That is only the selfish perception of people. Truly skilled Trainers should try to win with the Pokémon they love best.
Was she right?
you just know
>Was she right?
No.
>Elite 4 member, 2nd strongest trainer in all of Johto
>Literal nobody
>Literal nobody
He's in a resort that you can only visit if you've defeated the E4
That's a retired champion
Its never stayed anywhere that you need to be or have been a champion to go there.
stated*
you can wreck her shit with 0 effort if you choose the pokemon that the literal nobody suggests.
God I hate the HG/SS redesigns for characters.
Six gardevoirs, got it
Of course she was. It's a children's video game. Only a complete fricking moron would play to min/max it.
sounds like a hobbyist
if you want to stay at that level, you do you
Sounds like she rather wants to frick her pokemon, than winning.
If pokemon were real she would be, but pokemon is a video game based on numbers. No amount of loving a shitmon will increase its bst.
>be autistic
>Fire pokemon user only
>Meet her
I never had a moment where I agreed with an npc like this again.
YJK
>come back and beat her with just a tyranitar
maybe ya should have used the strongest dark type in the region ""Elite 4""
the pokemon I love are the strong ones. Because I love strong pokemon.
Dummy.
In PvE (IE: Singleplayer Story and Battle Tower/Frontier) yes, in PvP (IE: Online, Showdown) no.
Since Karen is a NPC in the single player mode she is correct for her own context.
Strong Pokemon. Weak Pokemon. She fricks them all!
>sweeps u with my level 100 Garchomp
lol
Training pokemon is not a skill.
Yes. Play the story mode of Pokémon with whatever you like, then build your competitive teams after you unlock the post game.
Was the league in the old games a near impossible challenge or something every little Timmy goes through for a piece of paper like the newer games?
In every game the e4 challenge is dependent on how dumb the kid playing it is. I played yellow first and was fricking steamrolling it with nidoking, not knowing he's one of the best pokemon in the game for a main story. Meanwhile Ruby, which I should have had an easier time with since I could actually comprehend words, I genuinely struggled with.
You picked Treecko, didn't you?
No, torchic.
I lvl'd my starter only and beat it, it was a bit tricky with running out of moves and I remember a level up got me a new skill so I could replace some other with fresh moves
So yes it was easy, don't even need to know what all the items does I guess.
Speaking as someone who started with gen 1
old games had piss easy E4, made worse by absolutely moronic AI
Gen 3 was the first gen where the E4 even remotely put up a challenge but it wasn't much
Gen 4 and 5 had the most consistently challenging E4, aside from the gen 2 remakes which were piss easy, with as an outlier the BW2 challenge mode
after that it drops off of a cliff again, with the one notable exception of BDSP, which probably is the hardest E4 the series ever had
note that none of these are genuinely difficult, but the harder ones can actually stand up to Timmy's charizard and cheerleaders
>Cynthia's EV trained Garchomp
They need to do this for every gym leader and E4.
She's right, the games are easy enough as is, you don't need to minmax your team, just choose whoever you like the best. Unless you're a competitive multiplayer pokemon player but at that point you're such a hopeless homosexual that there's no point in even talking to you.
Not just Pokemon. This goes for anything where a game gives you a choice. You should choose something first because you like it, then make it work for you.
I mostly like strong pokemon, so it works out for me.
Karen's mommypits