>wasn't a game that spent over 10 years in development
It's still been in dev for a long ass time. It was announced in like 2018 and that was after a few years of conceptual work had already been completed. Would not doubt that it was 10 years, considering you can find mentions of a shift up beginning development on an unnamed action project almost as far back as the studios founding its likely been 10 years. It was originally aiming for a ps4/xbone/pc release before it was formally announced as a current gen title.
The game was announced in 2019, and was being developed before that. 10 years is a stretch but if you think it was shat out within two, you're moronic.
I thought snoys were telling everyone how this was was going to make cucked wokeoids kneel and get a record shattering metacritic score. What happened?
When you count that this game has unironically gotten lower scores from multiple outlets because it has hot women in it, it just looks worse for Shitfield
It's kind like how Famitsu reviewers weren't allowed to give Dirge of Cerberus lower than a 7. Giving a tentpole release of a Western AAA publisher less than 9 is sending a message, but less than an 8 would be getting into "they might blacklist us or send future review copies late in retaliation" territory.
For real...
The amount of "Woke" game journos that are review bombing stellar Blade must be huge. I'm amazed by the fact this game managed to hit 82! It must be realy good, likely 85+, to be able to score well even with all the woke agenda and hate.
Stellar Blade doing great If you look at the big picture... Can't say the game about Starfield that Cherry-picked reviwers for better grade...
reviews are literally worthless
"journalists" are all paid off
user reviews don't matter because it's either 10/10s because snoy exclusive or 0/10s because of culture war bullshit
I wonder if the game turning out to be mid is actually even better for journos cuz they can just give a 7-8 and have it be somewhat realistic while also causing melties and further clicks
Frankly I'd prefer it to be either shit or good. The game wasn't even super coomerific either. What a shame. Yet another https://bloodknife.com/everyone-beautiful-no-one-horny/
>Ganker caring for reviews now
You homosexuals are so contrarian, that I only hope that you think that not breathing is based, or something equally as moronic
>no curvy women allowed
Oh, is this the new programming you chuds have gotten ? I see it everywhere these days. What fake headline will you be spamming everywhere next week I wonder ?
>Bethesda's Magnum Opus has to be compared to Coomer Bait sponsored by Snoy to get the their first W
Todd, must be uncorking the oldest wine bottle he has now.
starfield score is propped up by sheer bribery and bethesda dicksucking
stellar blade score is despite review bombing by seething leftys
only a subhuman mongoloid doesn't realize this
https://old.reddit.com/r/Gamingcirclejerk/comments/1cc0lgk/its_confirmed/ >Gamingcirclejerk says the game is fine
chvdbros...i thought we weren't trannies?
>The first real game from a mobile gacha developer >The latest title a decade in the making from an acclaimed studio that MS paid 7 billion dollars for
This, stupid comparison that only makes Shartfield look worse, but it's good to know that buckbroken Xtroons were behind the Stellar Blade hate campaign all along.
Kill metacritic posters.
Behead metacritic posters.
Sodomize metacritic posters
Brutallly mutilate metacritic posters.
Piss into a metacritic poster's water supply.
Alter a metacritic poster's genetic makeup with a mRNA virus.
Shoot metacritic posters into the atmosphere with a rocket, then shoot the rocket with a nuke.
>Snoys use Metacritic as part of their shitposts for years for slop like NuGod Of War and The Last Of Us >Suddenly Metacritic is bad now because Sony's games are under performing
Loving
Every
Laugh
Always has been. Anything above 80 is worth buying on day one. Unless it's overpriced AAA shit going for 70 dollars from EA, Ubishart and the other usual suspects.
>ff7rebirth get high scores >xfarts be all "who cares" >stellar blade gets the same score as starfield >xfarts piss and shit themselves in joy
Loving
Every
Kek
That's completely legitimate though. It's why for example furry shit doesn't usually tackle serious stories, it's too ridiculous when everything is put together.
4/5 is not a bad individual score, however when you're taking the average of multiple scores, it's not very good since most critics aren't harsh on games
I get that people are still going to defend this game to be a contrarian, because of culture wars or whatever typical reason, but I doubt anyone will actually buy it.
Stellar Blade also wasn't a game that spent over 10 years in development and it has like half the budget
>wasn't a game that spent over 10 years in development
It's still been in dev for a long ass time. It was announced in like 2018 and that was after a few years of conceptual work had already been completed. Would not doubt that it was 10 years, considering you can find mentions of a shift up beginning development on an unnamed action project almost as far back as the studios founding its likely been 10 years. It was originally aiming for a ps4/xbone/pc release before it was formally announced as a current gen title.
>it's good because they put less effort into it
Weird cope.
This slop has been worked on in some form since at least 2016 according to the director.
The game was announced in 2019, and was being developed before that. 10 years is a stretch but if you think it was shat out within two, you're moronic.
Imagine if Metacritic went offline and game journos all exploded. You’d have to actually think for yourself.
You can do that either way anon. And let's not forget their awful opinions brings us something to talk about on here
Starfield paid for reviews, Stellar Blade was review bombed
Holy copium
you can read all the reviews, the opposite is true. moron
I remember when "review bombing" was "not a real thing".
Like HL?
No one should care what reviewers say since they are bought and paid for prostitutes or spitefully biased redditards.
>W-WELL
>Y-YOU SEE, I-IT'S BECAUSE
>A-ACKSHUALLY
>T-THIS IS OKAY BECAUSE
the absolute fricking cope LMAO
83 is a good score, Saarfield didn't fricking deserve one that high.
Stellar Blade probably doesn’t deserve it either. They both look like hot garbage, pretty sad shit for basically first party output.
>They both look like hot garbage,
you're a fricking moron. stellar blade looks amazing if you aren't a literal homosexual. YWNBAW
Played the demo, it's like Wo Long with sexy girls. I'd say the sexy girls are worth the point or 2 it has over Wo Long.
just go watch some porn my guy
>Women can't be attractive
have a nice day homosexual
Exactly.
Starfield in reality was like a 71-75...max!
>todd's 10 year in the making masterpiece is as good as coomer bait made cheaply
The xbox twitter must be on this copium right now.
Holy shit i knew.
The seething is real.
https://twitter.com/Xcension/status/1783141579642855495?t=-RKgyKnG2Kbu0EH-ZEwM5w&s=19
Xbox outlets gave it 10/10 scores that pumped the score up. It's should be at around 75ish.
I thought snoys were telling everyone how this was was going to make cucked wokeoids kneel and get a record shattering metacritic score. What happened?
Those were paid asiatic shills. They are always delusional
81 is more than enough to make them seethe
When you count that this game has unironically gotten lower scores from multiple outlets because it has hot women in it, it just looks worse for Shitfield
>hot women
bugs aren’t attractive
It's kind like how Famitsu reviewers weren't allowed to give Dirge of Cerberus lower than a 7. Giving a tentpole release of a Western AAA publisher less than 9 is sending a message, but less than an 8 would be getting into "they might blacklist us or send future review copies late in retaliation" territory.
For real...
The amount of "Woke" game journos that are review bombing stellar Blade must be huge. I'm amazed by the fact this game managed to hit 82! It must be realy good, likely 85+, to be able to score well even with all the woke agenda and hate.
Stellar Blade doing great If you look at the big picture... Can't say the game about Starfield that Cherry-picked reviwers for better grade...
reviews are literally worthless
"journalists" are all paid off
user reviews don't matter because it's either 10/10s because snoy exclusive or 0/10s because of culture war bullshit
I wonder if the game turning out to be mid is actually even better for journos cuz they can just give a 7-8 and have it be somewhat realistic while also causing melties and further clicks
Frankly I'd prefer it to be either shit or good. The game wasn't even super coomerific either. What a shame. Yet another https://bloodknife.com/everyone-beautiful-no-one-horny/
Beside all the culture wars drama, a 25 hour game for 70$ should never get a higher score than 70.
>Every game should be stretched out to 100+ hours with meaningless garbage filler
I mean this with all sincerity have a nice day
>I want to pay 70$, maybe even more soon, for games with no content and zero replayability
Eat fricking shit and die, sunday gamer
This so much sister I love Ubisoft towers and meaningless side quests in ff7 rebirth
>you can only make a game 40+ hour long if you fill it with side quests and ubisoft towers
rope, now
Calm down sister I'm on your side I recommend hrt now
>Ganker caring for reviews now
You homosexuals are so contrarian, that I only hope that you think that not breathing is based, or something equally as moronic
They always did. They would shitpost over a 1 point metacritic score difference.
You won't get Stellar Blade anyway, sorry, Microsoft's own "no curvy women allowed" policy.
>no curvy women allowed
Oh, is this the new programming you chuds have gotten ? I see it everywhere these days. What fake headline will you be spamming everywhere next week I wonder ?
sony has been the most aggressive with censoring, it’s not even close.
True, MS has nothing to censor when they don't produce any games
Hello sirs.
holy kek months and months of endless shilling and this is the best they can do?
why do you talk in every thread as if todd howard is reading every thread
I mean he's the last person on earth wbo still cares about starfield.
>Bethesda's Magnum Opus has to be compared to Coomer Bait sponsored by Snoy to get the their first W
Todd, must be uncorking the oldest wine bottle he has now.
>relying on israelitescore instead of sales data
The mark of an idiot
>98 before sex penalties
Not bad
>78 after the snoy bonus
It is because the tru before is 93 without the sexy tax
Stella Blade is review bombed by Jws and pedos over the fact it has sexy women it
starfield score is propped up by sheer bribery and bethesda dicksucking
stellar blade score is despite review bombing by seething leftys
only a subhuman mongoloid doesn't realize this
https://old.reddit.com/r/Gamingcirclejerk/comments/1cc0lgk/its_confirmed/
>Gamingcirclejerk says the game is fine
chvdbros...i thought we weren't trannies?
Starfield with paid reviews could only get an 83
Stellar Blade with the ire of every troony in the industry still got an 83.
See how that works?
it's just a generic korean mobile game, I'm just surprised it's not a 60
>wr live in a timeline where Oneechanbara and the next bethesda game might have the same score
It's beatiful.
these outrage marketing threads are too obvious
Until the actual release day, when people/marketers upload webms of the game, this is all we have.
>I'm posting in an outrage marketing thread because it's all I have
that's pretty sad
holy frick imagine caring what REVIEWERS of all people think
>The first real game from a mobile gacha developer
>The latest title a decade in the making from an acclaimed studio that MS paid 7 billion dollars for
This, stupid comparison that only makes Shartfield look worse, but it's good to know that buckbroken Xtroons were behind the Stellar Blade hate campaign all along.
What happened to the 90+ Metacritic for Ronin and Stellar Blade, Bald Dave?
>MFW Watching the snoy cope that their "Next 90+ Metacrtic Sony Banger" is mediocre
Stellar Blade got a -10 point hit to its score due to not hiring a consulting firm.
Kill metacritic posters.
Behead metacritic posters.
Sodomize metacritic posters
Brutallly mutilate metacritic posters.
Piss into a metacritic poster's water supply.
Alter a metacritic poster's genetic makeup with a mRNA virus.
Shoot metacritic posters into the atmosphere with a rocket, then shoot the rocket with a nuke.
>Snoys use Metacritic as part of their shitposts for years for slop like NuGod Of War and The Last Of Us
>Suddenly Metacritic is bad now because Sony's games are under performing
Loving
Every
Laugh
>Implying I'm a consoleBlack person
KYS
@Xcension
Put me in the screencap.
Always has been. Anything above 80 is worth buying on day one. Unless it's overpriced AAA shit going for 70 dollars from EA, Ubishart and the other usual suspects.
If number threads are allowed then roll charts should also be allowed. 83.
>ff7rebirth get high scores
>xfarts be all "who cares"
>stellar blade gets the same score as starfield
>xfarts piss and shit themselves in joy
Loving
Every
Kek
Rebirth is coming to PC in June, Snoyster. The only version that matters ;>)
Good, buy it on steam like Helldivers and stop the cringe petitions.
Not buying Helldivers or any Snoy slop on Steam. Sucks to suck, dear snoy.
No problem, my beef isn't isn't with pcbros they are cool, terninal xfarts and philsisters are the cancer that ruins a nation.
>Implying Snoys aren't equally cancer
Consolegays are a disease.
Steller Blade already left it's mark before release.
I don't think I've ever seen any art or discussion of Starfield (that wasn't console wars)
>console ratings should be reduced -20% to get the true score
>leaves shitfield as a 63/100 game
always works
>MFW The entitled, sub-moronic, cancerous Sony fanbase take a big fat L
>game bad because attractive woman
That's completely legitimate though. It's why for example furry shit doesn't usually tackle serious stories, it's too ridiculous when everything is put together.
I mean it's quite literally 4/5. It certainly isn't bad.
4/5 is not a bad individual score, however when you're taking the average of multiple scores, it's not very good since most critics aren't harsh on games
I get that people are still going to defend this game to be a contrarian, because of culture wars or whatever typical reason, but I doubt anyone will actually buy it.