I remember back around when arkham city was coming out and I was browsing the job listings rocksteady had, and normally when you look at the list of benefits you see things like overtime compensation, retirement contributions ,healthcare packages and all that. But here it said there's a communal kitchen space in the office which has a bowl that gets supplied regularly with fresh fruit
I lold
wow what luxury, really know how to treat a guy
>Avengers has actually interesting combat compared to this
Especially since all the characters fight differently. In SS, all the members fight the same and use the same guns.
it's really fricking stupid to complain or make fun about sales in general.
but sure keep going, just don't start crying when companies stop doing sales until 1-2 years after launch.
You don't seem to understand, you moronic fricking homosexual. It is going on sale, as all of these worthless shitty games do, because no one is buying them. Sale or no sale, no one is buying shitty westerntrash games anymore. It is flop after flop after flop.
>Staff getting culled all over the homosexualroony industry >troony studios being closed >homosexual games being cancelled >5 trillion dollars of value wiped off of the westerntrash industry >Not a flop
Uh-huh...
>fat slob harley unlike the sex porn goddess harley we had in arkham knight >trans and gay flags galore in the game, just trying to half ass good boy points with western media >WORST boss battles in a major game in the last 10 years >shit gameplay loop where they ditched the dark knight and decided to go fort nite >3 types of missions >DA JOKA baby as DLC >9 years dev time 200 milly down the shitter
I played the alpha and they look better than they feel. I found them quite hard to control especially the teleporting boomerang one. Harley's swing has no momentum and the jumping shark is awkward because you just jump and have no accuracy. Only Deadshot was good because his rocket allowed for precision but it has such shitty timers on it it kills the fun.
seriously, who was this game aimed for? fans of the comics would never want to kill their favorite heroes and non-fans don't give a frick about superhero games
some warner bros executive probably saw the middling success of the first suicide squad movie and decided this was going to be a big franchise, greenlighting the game based off his own internal hype despite it taking over 5 years to make
the fact these guys are trying to get the live service big bucks but don't have the common sense to use harley's design from the first suicide squad movie like fortnite did will never not confuse me
Because the industry is a paradox right now, at the top you have people who just want to check boxes and do live-service and mtx, etc. because on paper that makes the most money, but when it worked in the past those practices and even subpar gameplay were usually outweighed by the some other appeal (in character design for example, like in gacha games). And at the bottom you have people (for are only even there for that same box checking reason) who actively add negative appeal to games due to pseudo-morality reasons. Thus combined they create games with mediocre (at best) gameplay, shitty practices and nothing even appealing to experience to make up for it - Who would play that? No one, that's who.
>fans of the comics would never want to kill their favorite heroes
I love Spidey and I have no issues with playing Venom killing him. I'd have issues with playing Morlun because the Inheritors are absolute garbage, but playing as a villain killing a hero isn't an issue at all as long as they don't try to justify it because "My dad was mean to me and this guy tried to stop me" or something.
Killing the Justice League isn't the issue, it's how they did it that's the issue and how unceremoniously they did it. Wonder Woman getting the "hero" role is also the dumbest nonsense imaginable because they respect her instead of Batman, the character Rocksteady pretty much built their entire company around. Batman should have been doing what Wonder Woman was doing and he should have gotten the heroic death where Harley lets bygones be bygones because he saved their ass, that's the issue.
>Batman should have been doing what Wonder Woman
I agree. Batman would actually kill the justice league if he had to and having the squad (more so Harley) have to work with Batman would be a more interesting angle. Oh well, rest in piss rocksteady.
>he should have gotten the heroic death where Harley lets bygones be bygones because he saved their ass
Could've even had a nice call-back where Harley kinda realizes what the Joker saw in Batman to have such have had such a obsession with him after all her time as his underling who just went along with it out of obligation rather than being invested in Batman as much as he was.
You can ask that a ton of modern flops, all entertainment products created by and for people who don't actually give a frick (beyond building soapboxes) and against the people who made all of this profitable in the first place.
Why not just make a fricking Justice League game, the only one they need to power down is Superman, and even then they could just say "a low level wave of kryptonite radiation is spreading all over earth due to braniac" or just power him down to DCAU levels of "weak to electricity and magic, not as fast as the flash"
If you haven't noticed, they've been trying to push the Suicide Squad hard, especially since the movies came out. It's also really hard to have missed the total collapse of Marvel's Avengers as well so maybe they didn't want to have the same thing happen to them and decided to try the Suicide Squad.
Wasn't Suicide Squad (the movie) kind of a flop too? I remember years ago it was being hyped by Jared Leto making an ass of himself with his "method acting", and then the movie turned out to be dogshit. The only thing people seemed to like was Robbie's Harley Quinn. Now they managed to ruin her too in the game.
The first movie was a critical disaster but it actually got money and made Harley Quinn super popular with normalgays for a while. Its success was probably why they decided to make a Suicide Squad game in the first place, since it was by that time that development started. Also probably why they decided to suddenly make Deadshot black.
But for whatever reason they took too long to develop it, and only released when the SS was already kind of forgotten about and even Harley Quinn isn't that big of a deal any longer.
I have no idea why they need to force live service into games, even from the point of view of the business, it's just such a huge gamble. That a ton of people will purchase your game is a relatively safe bet given the studio and the IP, but that they will consistently play it for years to buy more and more microtransactions requires so much to go right that it is just unrealistic. Let alone when the game proper is so barebones.
WB are fricking morons haemorrhaging money so they look at something like fortnite and think they need their own version to get out of their financial problems. They just don't realise that big successes like fortnite are rare
Definitely worth the Sweet Baby bux.
Anon, they pay sweet baby
That's right, they paid them to lose millions of dollars.
lol, worse than jannies (short for israeli trannies)
But in exchange for hiring sweet baby to kill their game they get the sweet sweet DIE money from blackrock.
They would have to pay me to ever play this dogshit.
still too expensive, especially because the majority of the comments are people who are unable to actually log into the game
Can't they get it to 41%?
>underrated comment
I remember back around when arkham city was coming out and I was browsing the job listings rocksteady had, and normally when you look at the list of benefits you see things like overtime compensation, retirement contributions ,healthcare packages and all that. But here it said there's a communal kitchen space in the office which has a bowl that gets supplied regularly with fresh fruit
I lold
wow what luxury, really know how to treat a guy
still not buying it
did you know the shark's a homosexual?
The price isn't the issue though.
Over 10$, still to much
Avengers has actually interesting combat compared to this
This is just a generic shooter
>Avengers has actually interesting combat compared to this
Especially since all the characters fight differently. In SS, all the members fight the same and use the same guns.
they released same week as Helldivers 2, what the frick did they expect lmao
it's really fricking stupid to complain or make fun about sales in general.
but sure keep going, just don't start crying when companies stop doing sales until 1-2 years after launch.
stfu rocksteady
You don't seem to understand, you moronic fricking homosexual. It is going on sale, as all of these worthless shitty games do, because no one is buying them. Sale or no sale, no one is buying shitty westerntrash games anymore. It is flop after flop after flop.
Just bought 5 more copies and sent it to people on that incel curator group 🙂
Larry paid for it so you could enjoy it for half the price.
With the money you saved, you can now afford a skin
>allow more people to experience KINO gem experience at a lesser price
>"f... Flopped ah... Ahah.."
Shut it chuds
>Staff getting culled all over the homosexualroony industry
>troony studios being closed
>homosexual games being cancelled
>5 trillion dollars of value wiped off of the westerntrash industry
>Not a flop
Uh-huh...
I would buy it if it was 80% or something like that
I'm not even a dc fan but this shit hurt to watch
>last WB game i bought was mad max
>compare it to suicide squad
that all time peak is embarassing
Mad Max was great. I just bought the quarry which I think is made by Warner Brothers not sure though
ONE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
TWO NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
Holy shit
If I was given 10$ to play this shit I would not take them
>fat slob harley unlike the sex porn goddess harley we had in arkham knight
>trans and gay flags galore in the game, just trying to half ass good boy points with western media
>WORST boss battles in a major game in the last 10 years
>shit gameplay loop where they ditched the dark knight and decided to go fort nite
>3 types of missions
>DA JOKA baby as DLC
>9 years dev time 200 milly down the shitter
wienersteady KWAB WB KWAB
>>DA JOKA baby as DLC
They WISH they could get da joka baby's cult following
troony jannies will fail to censor the sweet baby fiasco just like they failed to censor the 2014 fiasco
...and back then they even banned posters left and right...
troon cabal whiteknighting another troon cabak, nothing really surprising
The only good thing I have seen from the game is that movement looks kind of fun
I played the alpha and they look better than they feel. I found them quite hard to control especially the teleporting boomerang one. Harley's swing has no momentum and the jumping shark is awkward because you just jump and have no accuracy. Only Deadshot was good because his rocket allowed for precision but it has such shitty timers on it it kills the fun.
Ok but like it’s not as much of a slop flop as Palworld though!!
seriously, who was this game aimed for? fans of the comics would never want to kill their favorite heroes and non-fans don't give a frick about superhero games
some warner bros executive probably saw the middling success of the first suicide squad movie and decided this was going to be a big franchise, greenlighting the game based off his own internal hype despite it taking over 5 years to make
the fact these guys are trying to get the live service big bucks but don't have the common sense to use harley's design from the first suicide squad movie like fortnite did will never not confuse me
Using the attractive Harley would make the consultant firm they hired extremely angry
Because the industry is a paradox right now, at the top you have people who just want to check boxes and do live-service and mtx, etc. because on paper that makes the most money, but when it worked in the past those practices and even subpar gameplay were usually outweighed by the some other appeal (in character design for example, like in gacha games). And at the bottom you have people (for are only even there for that same box checking reason) who actively add negative appeal to games due to pseudo-morality reasons. Thus combined they create games with mediocre (at best) gameplay, shitty practices and nothing even appealing to experience to make up for it - Who would play that? No one, that's who.
>seriously, who was this game aimed for?
Black women. SBI co-founder said that every game must be targeted at black women
ah yes, the target audience thinking stellar blade's mc looks like a child
>who was this game aimed for
The crowd complaining about problematic video games who don't actually buy video games.
Gay Black folk from outer space
>fans of the comics would never want to kill their favorite heroes
I love Spidey and I have no issues with playing Venom killing him. I'd have issues with playing Morlun because the Inheritors are absolute garbage, but playing as a villain killing a hero isn't an issue at all as long as they don't try to justify it because "My dad was mean to me and this guy tried to stop me" or something.
Killing the Justice League isn't the issue, it's how they did it that's the issue and how unceremoniously they did it. Wonder Woman getting the "hero" role is also the dumbest nonsense imaginable because they respect her instead of Batman, the character Rocksteady pretty much built their entire company around. Batman should have been doing what Wonder Woman was doing and he should have gotten the heroic death where Harley lets bygones be bygones because he saved their ass, that's the issue.
>Batman should have been doing what Wonder Woman
I agree. Batman would actually kill the justice league if he had to and having the squad (more so Harley) have to work with Batman would be a more interesting angle. Oh well, rest in piss rocksteady.
>he should have gotten the heroic death where Harley lets bygones be bygones because he saved their ass
Could've even had a nice call-back where Harley kinda realizes what the Joker saw in Batman to have such have had such a obsession with him after all her time as his underling who just went along with it out of obligation rather than being invested in Batman as much as he was.
You can ask that a ton of modern flops, all entertainment products created by and for people who don't actually give a frick (beyond building soapboxes) and against the people who made all of this profitable in the first place.
Why not just make a fricking Justice League game, the only one they need to power down is Superman, and even then they could just say "a low level wave of kryptonite radiation is spreading all over earth due to braniac" or just power him down to DCAU levels of "weak to electricity and magic, not as fast as the flash"
If you haven't noticed, they've been trying to push the Suicide Squad hard, especially since the movies came out. It's also really hard to have missed the total collapse of Marvel's Avengers as well so maybe they didn't want to have the same thing happen to them and decided to try the Suicide Squad.
>they've been trying to push the Suicide Squad hard
well they've failed spectacularly on every level
They apparently didn't get the memo after the second movie also flopped.
They'll be fine, they got that Sweet Baby social credits
Wish Geben would delist the game
Wasn't Suicide Squad (the movie) kind of a flop too? I remember years ago it was being hyped by Jared Leto making an ass of himself with his "method acting", and then the movie turned out to be dogshit. The only thing people seemed to like was Robbie's Harley Quinn. Now they managed to ruin her too in the game.
both movies flopped
No the first did fricking amazing in the box office.
The first movie was a critical disaster but it actually got money and made Harley Quinn super popular with normalgays for a while. Its success was probably why they decided to make a Suicide Squad game in the first place, since it was by that time that development started. Also probably why they decided to suddenly make Deadshot black.
But for whatever reason they took too long to develop it, and only released when the SS was already kind of forgotten about and even Harley Quinn isn't that big of a deal any longer.
I wouldn't play this shit if they paid me to.
I have no idea why they need to force live service into games, even from the point of view of the business, it's just such a huge gamble. That a ton of people will purchase your game is a relatively safe bet given the studio and the IP, but that they will consistently play it for years to buy more and more microtransactions requires so much to go right that it is just unrealistic. Let alone when the game proper is so barebones.
WB are fricking morons haemorrhaging money so they look at something like fortnite and think they need their own version to get out of their financial problems. They just don't realise that big successes like fortnite are rare
>this is the studio that made asylum and city
>was the studio
pretty much everyone from the arkham series left