No, they can because Warner Bros has a huge law dick and will skull frick Steam and Gaben if they allow shit like honest negative reviews that'll damage their brand
>steam deleting reviews due to "review bombing" >everyone is shitting on it >abysmally low player numbers for a "aaa" game
yeah, i think they won
>starfield has negative reviews >HAHAHA LOOK I WILL MAKE A THREAD ABOUT IT EVERYDAY >Suicide Squad has good reviews >b-b-but they deleted the negative ones!!! An epic conspiracy made it overwhelmingly positive!
The absolute state of chuds
Only refunded games should be allowed to have their reviews deleted (to prevent actual review bombing like buy -> review -> refund)
If you paid for the game they should never delete your review
>Only refunded games should be allowed to have their reviews deleted (to prevent actual review bombing like buy -> review -> refund)
No that shouldn't be allowed either, if you bought a game and its shit and want to say why it was shit and refund it you should be allowed to as Steam currently lets you.
But it says this reviewer no longer owns the game, as it should.
deleting reviews due to "review bombing
One homosexual made this up and everybody just ran with it. There’s literally no evidence of this occurring. I don’t even give a frick about this game I just hate lying dishonest fricks and I get a kick out of spiting them
Steam has deleted negative reviews but only when it's tied to political reviewbombing (like Chinese reviewbombing against certain games).
Suicide Squad hasn't gotten negative reviews because most people steer away from it and the only one buying it are the usual cape shit eaters. It's basically a Neptunia situation.
No capeshitters were killed and if you wouldn't be a med-less shitter you would've actually watched all the cutscenes to realize that none of the capeshits who get killed are real. They are all pulled from the Multiverse. The whole fricking game is about the DC Multiverse shit. Stop pretending as if you were a capeshit fan when you don't even know anything about it, but are just feigning concern because you're fricking moronic and have no other way to voice your "HARLEY IS A dicky LOVING SEXUAL PREDATOR ITS SO WOKE AHHHHH" bullshit.
The game is a continuation of the Arkham games and set in the same continuity.
The characters you kill, Batman, Superman, Flash, and Green Lantern, aren't multiverse versions of those characters. They the Arkham universe versions of those characters.
You literally kill the batman you played 4 games as. It's not a cheap clone, it's not a multiverse variant pulled in that took his place. It's the same Batman. That's why people are getting pissy about it.
You quite literally go through the "Batman Experience" during the tutorial of the game which acts as a lore dump for what happened during the main 3 Arkham games.
Even down to mentioning that Deadshot used to be white.
Not only that, but Harley is constantly, and I mean constantly, referring back to shit that happend during the Arkham trilogy as if she was directly there and a part of it. Because she was. Because this game is a continuation of the Arkham series continuity.
3 months ago
Anonymous
the batman arkham storyline ended with city, knight and origin were unnecessary additions
why would you want another follow-up instead of a new batman story in a new universe?
be glad they officially killed it with this suicide squad game
3 months ago
Anonymous
Knight had some good ideas to it. Joker being all in Bruce's head was actually a surprisingly clever way to bring him back and made for some pretty fun moments. It also wasn't even a bad idea to bring in the Red Hood story, though it was fricking moronic to try hyping up Arkham Knight as a totally original character that "we've never seen before" when everyone already caught on that it sounded like Jason Todd long before the game even released, not to mention literally NOTHING comes from the big reveal in game since you find out it IS Jason Todd and then he just completely fricks off, never to be seen or heard from again for the rest of the game. The whole game honestly has a big payoff problem where shit either goes completely unresolved, ends in a wet fart (Deathstroke), or you get teased with something big only to be told you need to complete a bunch of busywork garbage to actually get to have it (Riddler). It had some good things to work with but aside from Joker, it bungled them all.
Lmao, they won ashes and crumbs, nobody in their right mind gives 2 fricks about the fricking batman side villains and their antics, turns out getting rid of the central figure of your universe loses peoples interest in it. This will not even be considered canon by a overwhelmingly large majority of people despite whatever the authors say. It will be forgotten like all other slop always is.
As someone who like Saints Rows I think it looks fine but I am still going to be cheap and wait for big discounts which is like what always happens to big studio games.
Can you tell whats happening in a teamfight in Dota if you haven't played it? Or a fight in WC3? Age of Empires? Hell you can't even tell whats going on in modern Heartstone if you haven't played. It's good for games to have some depth.
>this is MMO raiding tier
its harder than mmo raids actually
the whole combat is so insanely mechanical that you need to have played street fighter competitively and ffxiv ultimates to half decently play endgame
I'd imagine most people were probably playing The Avengers on console too, and that game still did twice the numbers that Suicide Squad is doing and was still considered a colossal failure.
Even if it were doing far better on consoles (which it probably is not), a GaaS doesn't work when you lose nearly 2/3rds of your launch peak in less than a week and there is no reason to think consoles would have a better player retention rate even if its sales were higher.
I trust Steam reviews more because you must own the game to review it. You don't have to prove that you have even played the game on Metacritic. You can just log in, give it a 1, and done.
>game looks like shit >the only ones who buy it are people who enjoy eating shit >in a shocking turn of events, avowed shit-eaters rate the shit they eat very highly
No. Fricking. Way.
if a game looks like shit (looter shooter live service woke etc. etc.) then chances are it is actually gonna be shit
blindly following steam reviews is stupid too
shut up they deleted those reviews!! you hear me??
Money and integrity. No one cares about some indie asset flips getting shitty reviews.
But a AAA studio will do everything in their power to fudge the numbers on how bad their shitty games actually are.
They literally dropped an NDA weeks before release to stop critics for giving their honest opinions my guy.
Review bombing is a myth. If your game has overwhelmingly bad reviews, its 95% chance of being a bad game. 5% being ok but underrated.
No one makes hundreds of accounts just to give a game a bad review. Currently there are 743 bad reviews on Metacritic. But I’m supposed to expect that of these 700+ reviews, most of them are made by just a handful of people? All of which made several dozen of alternate accounts all with unique reviews and completely different usernames and have reviewed plenty media before the game released?
Yeah I don’t think so.
What’s more likely is your game sucks ass and homosexuals (who have a history of deleting negative reviews see Skullgirls) in charge marked the negative reviews on Steam as “review bomb”.
>No one makes hundreds of accounts just to give a game a bad review
You should try checking those users giving bad reviews to a reviewbombed game: it's always just one reviewed game, that game being the reviewbomb target.
>game looks like shit >the only ones who buy it are people who enjoy eating shit >in a shocking turn of events, avowed shit-eaters rate the shit they eat very highly
>cybertroony has negative reviews >perfectly ok >cod mw3 has negative reviews >totally ok >muh gamerino where the kill muh childhood characters has postive reviews? >THEY SURELY DELETED THE NEGATIVE REVIEWS TEJGORWIEKPFGR
Reminder they deleted negative reviews
you can't delete reviews on steam, you absolute schizo lol
They can due to """review bombing"""
it still doesn't delete them and suicide squad never had any "review bombs" on steam
you can literally go open the review graph on the store page and it doesn't say anything about reviews being hidden for being offtopic
you homies are legitimately fricked in the head if you think steam would ever delete reviews
No, they can because Warner Bros has a huge law dick and will skull frick Steam and Gaben if they allow shit like honest negative reviews that'll damage their brand
proof?
OVerwatch has the most negative reviews in Steam and Microsoft havent done shit atm
Suicide Squad sucks anyways
you can if you mark them as spam
they actually can, whether they did in this case i have no idea, the game is shit and the player counts are garbage
meds
Doesn't that mean the reviews should have an asterisk?
>starfield has negative reviews
>HAHAHA LOOK I WILL MAKE A THREAD ABOUT IT EVERYDAY
>Suicide Squad has good reviews
>b-b-but they deleted the negative ones!!! An epic conspiracy made it overwhelmingly positive!
The absolute state of chuds
No they didn’t. Stop saying this with no proof.
So why didn't they delete the Starfield negative reviews?
Todd is a cuck with a humiliation fetish. He requested that Steam leave them up and they respected his wishes.
>Top review is negative saying how the game is shit and they're deleting reviews
>Check the reviews a day later
>It's gone
Only refunded games should be allowed to have their reviews deleted (to prevent actual review bombing like buy -> review -> refund)
If you paid for the game they should never delete your review
>Only refunded games should be allowed to have their reviews deleted (to prevent actual review bombing like buy -> review -> refund)
No that shouldn't be allowed either, if you bought a game and its shit and want to say why it was shit and refund it you should be allowed to as Steam currently lets you.
But it says this reviewer no longer owns the game, as it should.
No. Go to metacritic. Steam reviews should be for owners only
Every game would just be positive then you stupid gorilla Black person.
enjoy your ban for racism
-ck
what should we apologize for?
>steam deleting reviews due to "review bombing"
>everyone is shitting on it
>abysmally low player numbers for a "aaa" game
yeah, i think they won
deleting reviews due to "review bombing
One homosexual made this up and everybody just ran with it. There’s literally no evidence of this occurring. I don’t even give a frick about this game I just hate lying dishonest fricks and I get a kick out of spiting them
Steam has deleted negative reviews but only when it's tied to political reviewbombing (like Chinese reviewbombing against certain games).
Suicide Squad hasn't gotten negative reviews because most people steer away from it and the only one buying it are the usual cape shit eaters. It's basically a Neptunia situation.
Exactly. Anybody who hated the game didn’t even pick it up.
>yeah, i think they won
They killed your toxic masculinity heroes
It's now canon
Yes, they won.
No capeshitters were killed and if you wouldn't be a med-less shitter you would've actually watched all the cutscenes to realize that none of the capeshits who get killed are real. They are all pulled from the Multiverse. The whole fricking game is about the DC Multiverse shit. Stop pretending as if you were a capeshit fan when you don't even know anything about it, but are just feigning concern because you're fricking moronic and have no other way to voice your "HARLEY IS A dicky LOVING SEXUAL PREDATOR ITS SO WOKE AHHHHH" bullshit.
The game is a continuation of the Arkham games and set in the same continuity.
The characters you kill, Batman, Superman, Flash, and Green Lantern, aren't multiverse versions of those characters. They the Arkham universe versions of those characters.
You literally kill the batman you played 4 games as. It's not a cheap clone, it's not a multiverse variant pulled in that took his place. It's the same Batman. That's why people are getting pissy about it.
They said same continuity, but they never said same universe 😉
He will return.
You quite literally go through the "Batman Experience" during the tutorial of the game which acts as a lore dump for what happened during the main 3 Arkham games.
Even down to mentioning that Deadshot used to be white.
Not only that, but Harley is constantly, and I mean constantly, referring back to shit that happend during the Arkham trilogy as if she was directly there and a part of it. Because she was. Because this game is a continuation of the Arkham series continuity.
the batman arkham storyline ended with city, knight and origin were unnecessary additions
why would you want another follow-up instead of a new batman story in a new universe?
be glad they officially killed it with this suicide squad game
Knight had some good ideas to it. Joker being all in Bruce's head was actually a surprisingly clever way to bring him back and made for some pretty fun moments. It also wasn't even a bad idea to bring in the Red Hood story, though it was fricking moronic to try hyping up Arkham Knight as a totally original character that "we've never seen before" when everyone already caught on that it sounded like Jason Todd long before the game even released, not to mention literally NOTHING comes from the big reveal in game since you find out it IS Jason Todd and then he just completely fricks off, never to be seen or heard from again for the rest of the game. The whole game honestly has a big payoff problem where shit either goes completely unresolved, ends in a wet fart (Deathstroke), or you get teased with something big only to be told you need to complete a bunch of busywork garbage to actually get to have it (Riddler). It had some good things to work with but aside from Joker, it bungled them all.
Lmao, they won ashes and crumbs, nobody in their right mind gives 2 fricks about the fricking batman side villains and their antics, turns out getting rid of the central figure of your universe loses peoples interest in it. This will not even be considered canon by a overwhelmingly large majority of people despite whatever the authors say. It will be forgotten like all other slop always is.
I didn't like it so it's not canon. Things I like are canon, and things I don't like aren't canon.
d
As someone who like Saints Rows I think it looks fine but I am still going to be cheap and wait for big discounts which is like what always happens to big studio games.
It's never been bad, shit bussing yo!
literally cannot tell what is going on, this is MMO raiding tier
You haven't played the game. You're not supposed to know.
>dude you haven't played clown vomit explosion game
yes
Can you tell whats happening in a teamfight in Dota if you haven't played it? Or a fight in WC3? Age of Empires? Hell you can't even tell whats going on in modern Heartstone if you haven't played. It's good for games to have some depth.
>this is MMO raiding tier
its harder than mmo raids actually
the whole combat is so insanely mechanical that you need to have played street fighter competitively and ffxiv ultimates to half decently play endgame
You're able to tell what's going on when you're actually playing the game. Makes for awful watching experiences though.
>7000 top concurrent players
LOL
That dosen't count the mayority of the playerbase playing on console!
I watched synthetic mans review and even discounting his edgyness the gameplay just looks boring.
To be fair, I find some of the cutscenes pretty interesting. And boomer’s dialogue is often pretty good.
>aw yeah it’s superma-
>aw frick it’s superman!
boomer is so good but I like harley too
>"bad guys are coming"
>-"ew not again, I've seen enough of that in dirty movies"
I find Harley insufferable personally.
-sed
Yeah, woo hoo, what a whopping' success. Reminder that his game cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make and was in development for over 7 years.
Most people are playing on console.
so why post the shill reviews on steam, where nobody is playing it?
>OP is about Steam review
>hurrrrr don't look at Steam charts
Buy an ad and have a nice day.
I'd imagine most people were probably playing The Avengers on console too, and that game still did twice the numbers that Suicide Squad is doing and was still considered a colossal failure.
Then why did Gotham Knights and Avengers both fail? They had more than twice the players than Suicide Squad on Steam.
Even if it were doing far better on consoles (which it probably is not), a GaaS doesn't work when you lose nearly 2/3rds of your launch peak in less than a week and there is no reason to think consoles would have a better player retention rate even if its sales were higher.
Sub 1000 in a week
Cope
PC isn’t the only system it’s available on.
who cares its a singleplayer game
you're having a hysteric woman moment if you can only enjoy something everyone else is doing something too
>who cares its a singleplayer game
does he know?
not everyone is into looter shooters
yes, people who are into looter shooters are playing f2p looter shooters instead of paying 70$ to get a worse experience
>Half the numbers sales and CCU of Avengers, which was a notorious flop
The game will be lucky to make it to the 2nd DLC character.
Unrelated but post that 20 points Twitter post defending The Marvels and blaming that movie's failure due to a 20 points conspiracy.
So how much money did it make? And does it cover 9 years of work?
this game sucks fortnite has so much more players and moneys
>(3,344)
The devil is in the detail, as the saying goes.
And anyway, frick sales number threads. Fricking wannabe normalgays.
I'm sorry for calling Suicide Squad bad.
In truth it's horrible.
Deleted review scores.
Here’s actual unbiased average score.
I trust Steam reviews more because you must own the game to review it. You don't have to prove that you have even played the game on Metacritic. You can just log in, give it a 1, and done.
see
if a game looks like shit (looter shooter live service woke etc. etc.) then chances are it is actually gonna be shit
blindly following steam reviews is stupid too
>I trust the platform where your review can be deleted for “review bombing” (aka being negative) and where you just need to buy it then can refund it
There are many games with lots of negative reviews. Why aren't they deleted? Hmmmmmmmmmm...............
What makes this game so special?
shut up they deleted those reviews!! you hear me??
Money and integrity. No one cares about some indie asset flips getting shitty reviews.
But a AAA studio will do everything in their power to fudge the numbers on how bad their shitty games actually are.
They literally dropped an NDA weeks before release to stop critics for giving their honest opinions my guy.
>implying it never happened that mad chuds made several accounts for review bombing
kys
Review bombing is a myth. If your game has overwhelmingly bad reviews, its 95% chance of being a bad game. 5% being ok but underrated.
No one makes hundreds of accounts just to give a game a bad review. Currently there are 743 bad reviews on Metacritic. But I’m supposed to expect that of these 700+ reviews, most of them are made by just a handful of people? All of which made several dozen of alternate accounts all with unique reviews and completely different usernames and have reviewed plenty media before the game released?
Yeah I don’t think so.
What’s more likely is your game sucks ass and homosexuals (who have a history of deleting negative reviews see Skullgirls) in charge marked the negative reviews on Steam as “review bomb”.
What is the major difference between reviewing a game on Steam and Metacritic, fake gamer?
me fricking your mom in her ass
Why so much butthurt over a simple question, fake gamer?
Steam requires you to own the game in your library, everyone with an IQ above freezing can tell this game fricking sucks and isn't worth their time.
These reviews
are from literally the dumbest people on the internet. People so fricking stupid they saw this game and thought "Wow! That looks good".
>Fake gamer
people who play capeshit games are the epitome of fake
>No one makes hundreds of accounts just to give a game a bad review
You should try checking those users giving bad reviews to a reviewbombed game: it's always just one reviewed game, that game being the reviewbomb target.
>game looks like shit
>the only ones who buy it are people who enjoy eating shit
>in a shocking turn of events, avowed shit-eaters rate the shit they eat very highly
No. Fricking. Way.
Nah they delete review scores on Steam that are negative.
Look at Metacritic and Google Review.
>cybertroony has negative reviews
>perfectly ok
>cod mw3 has negative reviews
>totally ok
>muh gamerino where the kill muh childhood characters has postive reviews?
>THEY SURELY DELETED THE NEGATIVE REVIEWS TEJGORWIEKPFGR
Suicide Flop: Kill the Studio
Why are zoomers and leftists such cucks for shitty games and the corporations who make them?