I hated ocarina of time. I hated twilight princess. I hated the story of tears of the kingdom. I hated the characters of tears of the kingdom. I hated the graphics of tears of the kingdom. But frick did I have fun with this game.
I wanted to hate tears of the kingdom but I can't, it's better than the sum of it parts.
>it's better than the sum of it parts.
The absolute shittiest take I've ever heard. If anything, it's less than the sum of its parts; a bunch of interesting and clever game mechanics all strung together to make a miserable, tedious, repetitive slog through a map we've already explored.
Just admit you're a fricking midwit who enjoys being kept busy with pointless chores, because that's what this whole game is.
wow thats cool. you’re not going to believe this, but did you know that ubisoft has been shitting out a dozen terrible games just like TotK every year? you should probably check those out!
Open World destroyed Zelda because it means there's no forward momentum anymore. By the end it feels like you accomplished nothing and just fricked around in a sandbox. Im glad FFXVI is going with Open Zone for this reason
I loved it because it did everything better than BOTW. Except one thing : sages powers. What were they thinking ?
in BOTW >permanenet buff where you just have to hold a button
in TOTK >go through menu to activate >go to the sage to talk to him >activate it accidentaly while trying to take an item >wait for cooldown >talk to the sage again when its not in your way or God knows where the frick its stuck into >activate power >desactivate on menu >never call any of those fricker except the bird
I thought they were great. Each new sage power was a game changer. Having the goron smash rocks and ore for me saved me a ton of weapons and bomb arrows. But I wouldn't keep them out all the time.
You're a fricking idiot. I know this is bait but botw set a gold standard in open world, and Elden Ring and ToTK are the only games that have surpassed it. No game is perfect, any real fan of any game will be the first to list its flaws. You're having an argument with yourself
>TotK reuses BotW's map there isn't any sense of exploration.
It uses the basic layout but everything in the game is different. Even older locations can have new things to find which adds to the sense of exploration because you don't only want to find new areas but also what's different with the old ones.
>Also since TotK reuses BotW's map there isn't any sense of exploration
for this to be true, you must be the most autistic person in the world remembering every single geographic layout to the point where it bothers you
or
you haven't played the game
They should have just put the Sage powers in a menu on d-pad down. They could still make them summons, they could still follow you around, but activating the powers should be on the d-pad.
>sage powers
yeah this needed to be reworked for sure. >be underground >grab some poes in the darkness, try to avoid enemies >accidentally trigger everybody's powers >goron frickin flies off into the distance alerting everything to my presence >now i have to waste a sword on some low tier shit
pretty gay. here's another one >drop in on a pack of moose >shoot them all in the head >run around spamming A >trigger the rito homie >he fricking blasts the meat with his wind >it flies over the cliff and starts floating downstream
t-thanks bro
i keep all 5 out all the time, and i dont really run into any problems. sometimes in cave or lumpy areas and i want a specific one like yunobo, but the weird terrain makes them randomly disappear, but really i have zero issues. the "accidentally activate them while picking stuff up" is 100% a skill issue. bad reaction times, bad spacial awareness, and also the clear choice to run in circles back towards the sages. the only one i ever bother to put away is yunobo, and thats ONLY if im doing extended vehicle travel, because for some reason him sitting on the front has actual weight/physics and can cause you to veer. its really not a problem.
I think the sages would've been much better to use if all of them had a contextual trigger like spamming A while gliding to trigger Tulin.
Or they could've added a separate radial that's triggered with the D-pad mineru gays need not apply
As much as Ganker likes to whine about Zelda, is anyone unironically hyped for a space game already done better by developers who aren’t fricking Bethesda? They should’ve just made Elder Scrolls VI
Hell no, it's going to be janky as frick and flop. I'm guessing it'll be a slightly better polished turd than mass effect andromeda, but play similarly poorly.
>ToTk was BotW 1.1
imagine where every game's +0.1 update was as tight, different and content packed as Totk. You can't because you clearly haven't played the game. Name me one example of a sequel reusing a map where so much care has been taken to remix and freshen up everything
>Name me one example of a sequel reusing a map where so much care has been taken to remix and freshen up everything
Any sequel that reuses a map is a +0.1 at best.
Kek it looks like it's going to be as big a flop as cyberpunk. Also all the snoy homosexuals are boycotting because bethesda's ignoring them. Hilarious.
Zelda is forever shit now due to this gmod sandbox bullshit. Even Nintendo themselves seem to constantly be working around it because they need to throw a brunch of shitty limitations on the player to make it an actual game.
I love it. I am like 100+ hours in and completed the 4 temples and feel like there is so much still to do.
Also upgraded the armors I really wanted and my batteries so got that grind mostly behind me.
It's fun.
I've barely even played the game
how do I make myself play it anons? I just have no motivation
I would rather browse Ganker or scream at street fighter 6 than hunt for koroks and shrines in the same map I did it for hundreds of hours already years ago
>it's good but something about it feels really lackluster compared to BOTW
Because whats there is good, but not "6 years wait, 70 dollars, reused map and assets" good. If TotK came out in 2019 and cost 60 dollars I think almost everyone would have been cool with it. For as cool as the fuse mechanic its ultimately a mistake if it ate up this much dev time.
It's the longest or second longest production cycle of a zelda game in the entire franchise's history but reuses the engine, 75% of the story, and the basemap of the prior game. And that would be fine, if on top of that there was an ungodly amount of shit to do in this rearranged world. There isn't. I'd even go so far as to say there's less to do in it versus BotW. There's no excuse. This was a $30 DLC they want 110% full price plus tip for. Absolute homosexualry.
No, WW is unironically what morons accused BotW of being. Almost completely empty map with tiny places of interest dotted around, many of which actually copypasted. You could level a similar complaint towards the Sky Islands of ToTk, except those are a small part of the game and they interact often with the land.
I've been saying that about Breath of the Wild since it came out, and I've been saying that about Tears of the Kingdom when it leaked. I don't like it. But apparently you're not allowed to dislike a Nintendo game on Ganker.
Nah, you're just a jaded gay who hates seeing everyone else like something you do not
I don't care if people like it. It's not my money that paid for the copies they bought. Seems to me like you're just offended that I found a Zelda game to be underwhelming.
>I don't like it.
And you're allowed to, the problem is that people like you have been ranting about botw and now TotK for SIX YEARS.
Think about that, for SIX YEARS you've been obsessing over the game more than any fan ever has.
>2017: BotW releases. >"I don't like it". >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2018: BotW DLC expansion pack releases >"I'm not getting it because I didn't like the game." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2019: BotW gets a sequel announced >"If they make it like BotW without fixing the issues I had with that game, then I won't get it." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2020-2023: Tons of threads speculating over limited info released about BotW sequel >"It doesn't look THAT different from BotW. I didn't like BotW so I'm not sure if I'll get the sequel." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases >"It's just BotW all over again. I didn't like BotW so I'm not getting TotK." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game and are just projecting your obsession.
because you're seething morons that can spend your time in any way but choose to b***h about something you dislike. I am obsessed with this game and that's fine cause I enjoy it. Haters on the other hand... can't understand their mania.
Its good that you're avoiding everybody that is telling you that its ok to not like games. I mean you're still here posting in a thread about a game you don't like. And you've been doing it for years. Grow some self awareness anon
Also no matter how salty you are most of us have loved this game, get over it
We are literally loving a game despite your disapproval. Nobody in this thread is that bothered by you, nobody that loves the game has felt like they need to attack you, this is literally all in your head, but well done on collection those (you)s, I bet this must be a very special day for you
because you're seething morons that can spend your time in any way but choose to b***h about something you dislike. I am obsessed with this game and that's fine cause I enjoy it. Haters on the other hand... can't understand their mania.
Its good that you're avoiding everybody that is telling you that its ok to not like games. I mean you're still here posting in a thread about a game you don't like. And you've been doing it for years. Grow some self awareness anon
Also no matter how salty you are most of us have loved this game, get over it
They literally think Ganker is the same person. That dude 6 years ago who didn't like botw is the same guy who's saying they don't like totk in their mind, because TWO people couldn't possibly dislike their game.
Well apparently Tendies can't shut up about BotW or TotK, so if you guys are gonna bring it up, then I'm just gonna respond by saying that I didn't like it.
Allow me to fix this >>2017: BotW releases. >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>okay, who cares. >>late 2017: BotW DLC expansion pack releases >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>okay, who cares. >2018: no dlc no sequel everyone has moved on to other games >I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >crickets, especially once smash comes out. >>2019: BotW gets a sequel announced >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>we haven't seen anything yet >>2020-mid 2022: very few threads talking about the new game because of the limited information >>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>why are you still making shitposting threads? We don't have anything to talk about. >>2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases >>>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>you're obsessed you've been at this for six years, get over it
>Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game
You see, it doesn't work both ways.
You're obsessed because you hate this game but can't bring yourself to leave it and fans be. I mean, I don't care for bad games like tlou and Terraria but I don't go into every thread about them and screech like an autist looking for validation of my opinion on it for six years. I just let people do what they want to do because I'm a normal person.
It's literally less added text than you originally posted, moron
11 months ago
Anonymous
You sure about that? Let's find out...
https://wordcounter.net/character-count
>2017: BotW releases. >"I don't like it". >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2018: BotW DLC expansion pack releases >"I'm not getting it because I didn't like the game." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2019: BotW gets a sequel announced >"If they make it like BotW without fixing the issues I had with that game, then I won't get it." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2020-2023: Tons of threads speculating over limited info released about BotW sequel >"It doesn't look THAT different from BotW. I didn't like BotW so I'm not sure if I'll get the sequel." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases >"It's just BotW all over again. I didn't like BotW so I'm not getting TotK." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game and are just projecting your obsession.
>Characters 808 Words 139 Lines 17
Allow me to fix this >>2017: BotW releases. >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>okay, who cares. >>late 2017: BotW DLC expansion pack releases >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>okay, who cares. >2018: no dlc no sequel everyone has moved on to other games >I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >crickets, especially once smash comes out. >>2019: BotW gets a sequel announced >>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>we haven't seen anything yet >>2020-mid 2022: very few threads talking about the new game because of the limited information >>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>why are you still making shitposting threads? We don't have anything to talk about. >>2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases >>>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS >>you're obsessed you've been at this for six years, get over it
>Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game
You see, it doesn't work both ways.
You're obsessed because you hate this game but can't bring yourself to leave it and fans be. I mean, I don't care for bad games like tlou and Terraria but I don't go into every thread about them and screech like an autist looking for validation of my opinion on it for six years. I just let people do what they want to do because I'm a normal person.
>Characters 1284 Words 241 Lines 26
What now, homosexual?
11 months ago
Anonymous
How much longer until we get tears of the kingdom on steam deck, free, unlocked framerate (consistant 60 fps preferably) ?
Why are trannies objectively moronic. >added
Thanks for proving me right, Erictroony.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Why are trannies objectively moronic.
Why don't you tell us based on your experience as one?
11 months ago
Anonymous
The frick did I do? All I did was ask a question you fricking loser. At least im contrubuting to the thread and not seething over moronic trannies like yourself. Do me a favor and have a nice day on your ceiling fan and turn it on before you die, homosexual.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>What now, homosexual?
What do you mean "what now?"
Anon, you went through the trouble of counting the words because you're obsessed.
>massive wall of text
Anon, almost all of that was copy and pasted from YOUR post. If you think he's obsessed because of that then you're the one who's obsessed.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Copied but then repackaged with even more text on top of that as I proved here:
You sure about that? Let's find out...
https://wordcounter.net/character-count
[...] >Characters 808 Words 139 Lines 17
[...] >Characters 1284 Words 241 Lines 26
What now, homosexual?
11 months ago
Anonymous
You're talking to a man who unironically praises TLOU and God of War because, in his twisted mind, metacritic cannot be wrong because otherwise his "it's popular, therefore it's good" mantra completely falls apart.
He's a broken man who deserves pity. Watch, he's already posted his sales images like [...]. Expect him to post smug zelda.png, if he hasn't already.
Erictroony, why are you so pathetic?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>brings up trannies for no reason
Obsessed.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Why are trannies objectively moronic.
Why don't you tell us based on your experience as one?
Erictroony, why are you avoiding the question?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Why are you?
11 months ago
Anonymous
I asked first, Erictroony 😉
11 months ago
Anonymous
And I’m asking you now since you’re the one who has that experience. 😉
11 months ago
Anonymous
And I’m asking you now since you’re the one who has that experience. 😉
You're talking to a man who unironically praises TLOU and God of War because, in his twisted mind, metacritic cannot be wrong because otherwise his "it's popular, therefore it's good" mantra completely falls apart.
He's a broken man who deserves pity. Watch, he's already posted his sales images like
Bi-Hourly TotK schizo thread.
. Expect him to post smug zelda.png, if he hasn't already.
>posts a massive wall of text responding to a guy who doesn't like a Zelda game >"You're obsessed" >"I'm a normal person."
You sure about that? Let's find out...
https://wordcounter.net/character-count
[...] >Characters 808 Words 139 Lines 17
[...] >Characters 1284 Words 241 Lines 26
What now, homosexual?
>Outlines seven years of posting in threads about a game he doesn't like
anons calling you obsessed might be on to something
>I've been saying that about Breath of the Wild >But apparently you're not allowed to dislike a Nintendo game on Ganker
so apparently nobody has stopped you from disliking a nintendo game for years?
Also good for you mate would you like a medal? Won't you stop telling people they're wrong for liking something you don't like until you get validation?
>For some reason you guys care that I dislike the game based on the amount of replies I'm getting to this post.
Anon, no one cares that you disliked the game. Its the fact that instead of accepting you dislike it you came here to scream that you disliked it.
>Anon, no one cares that you disliked the game. Its the fact that instead of accepting you dislike it you came here to scream that you disliked it.
If you didn't care that I disliked the game then why ddi you bother responding to my post?
>If you didn't care that I disliked the game then why ddi you bother responding to my post?
Well, you caught us there anon. Guys pack it up, lets admit Totk is nothing but a copypaste of botw, and we're all just wildly coping here. Its been a good run, but this butthole finally got the best of us. Sorry that we've been OBSESSED with YOU for the past 6 years when you did nothing but spread the truth, there's a very special somebody that died 2023 years ago that you remind me of
11 months ago
Anonymous
Ericrtroony, why are you so mentally ill?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Ericrtroony
who is this?
11 months ago
Anonymous
who is Eric?
He’s a bogeyman that the tendies invented. Pay it no mind.
11 months ago
Anonymous
ah
so the game has reached the "schizos attacking it and schizos defending it" phase
makes sense
11 months ago
Anonymous
>I mean, I could be wrong about that. Want to check for you?
I'll give it a check for you.
>look at multiple Zelda discussion threads >"I WANNA FRICK RIJU" >"OMG TULIN'S CUTE FLUFFY ARMPITS" >"WHAT IF YOU FRICKED ZELDA'S DRAGUSSY LOL!"
mmmm, quite a game you got there.
The frick did I do? All I did was ask a question you fricking loser. At least im contrubuting to the thread and not seething over moronic trannies like yourself. Do me a favor and have a nice day on your ceiling fan and turn it on before you die, homosexual.
Why are you?
Why are you worshipping trannies, reddit and subhumans?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Not a troony. Now, back on topic, will you consider streaming your suicide for my entertainment?
>That pic
Its hilarious that you posted this unironically when you come to screech in a Zelda thread where everybody is telling you its cool that you don't like the game
[...]
I don't care if people like it. It's not my money that paid for the copies they bought. Seems to me like you're just offended that I found a Zelda game to be underwhelming.
It's hilarious tht you're acting like my comment and my pic didn't bother you when it clearly did.
>2017: BotW releases. >"I don't like it". >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2018: BotW DLC expansion pack releases >"I'm not getting it because I didn't like the game." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2019: BotW gets a sequel announced >"If they make it like BotW without fixing the issues I had with that game, then I won't get it." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2020-2023: Tons of threads speculating over limited info released about BotW sequel >"It doesn't look THAT different from BotW. I didn't like BotW so I'm not sure if I'll get the sequel." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!" >2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases >"It's just BotW all over again. I didn't like BotW so I'm not getting TotK." >"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game and are just projecting your obsession.
bruh, give it a rest. I know you're fishing for (you)s but this is sad
>when you do it its engaging >when I do it its just responding (Look at these Imbeciles ENGAGE XD)
>Anon, no one cares that you disliked the game. Its the fact that instead of accepting you dislike it you came here to scream that you disliked it.
If you didn't care that I disliked the game then why ddi you bother responding to my post?
Its FUN? Its why we're all here on 4chin? But most of us in this thread are also having fun from Gankeridya, I'm sorry you're so jaded you need (you)s in your life [/spoiler]I do too[/spoiler]
I absolutely loved it, but there will always be things that falls short on. >Dungeons, while slightly improved since last time, are still weak. >With all the focus on sky islands this time around, they're all very small outside of the tutorial island >The depths, while a cool ideal, are underwhelming >Memories this time around while easier to find are oddly placed, and if focused on too soon, can ruin the flow of the story (not that there is much, but still) >Enemy variety still small >Constant menu navigating an issue. Armors not having a way to sort by favorites since the larger your wardrobe becomes, the bigger the pain it is to find what you need for the specific area >Arrow fusing can be done in the quick access menu but weapon fusing can't. Would be great if there was a way to pre-fuse arrows >Sage abilities a pain to work with since they're running around away from your reach and sometimes don't even appear when you need them (Yunobo would sometimes be miles away when I needed him and the whistling seems inconsistent)
>the depths, while a cool idea, are underwhelming
How is an entire inverse map that wasn't revealed prior to release "underwhelming"? >Enemy variety still small
The addition of Aerocuda, boss bokoblins, Zonai and Flux constructs, the walking trees, Gibdos, Gleeoks, Gloom Hands, Horriblins, and Like Likes aren't enough for you? >Sage abilities a pain to work with
I mostly agree with that, and the rest of your post, but I also think that they were implemented really well in some cases. Like Tulin always being with you in mid-air and Yunobo always being a fireable cannon on vehicles. There just needs to be a similar utility for Sidon and Riju. I still think that the Sages are far more useful than the Champion abilities though.
>There was like 19 different enemies in BotW. They add eight more
There were around 27 in botw not counting recolors.
Totk added the around same amount also not counting recolors.
>ten new enemies
I'm not exhausitively listing everything. Within the constructs there are what, 6 different types? Not to mention all the variants of the other enemies.
There was like 19 different enemies in BotW. They add eight more, and people act like it was the greatest improvement ever after six freaking years.
>people act like it was the greatest improvement ever
I'm really not. I literally just listed the categories of added enemies and asked if that wasn't enough. I'm sure you're the type of person that would claim even Elden Ring doesn't have enough enemies lol.
>Within the constructs there are what, 6 different types?
2. >Not to mention all the variants of the other enemies.
New colors are not new enemies. >I'm sure you're the type of person that would claim even Elden Ring doesn't have enough enemies lol.
Elden Ring has 150+ fricking unique enemies and dozens of unique bosses, WAY more than enough for a normal game, and yet even elden ring starts to feel a bit samey by the end due its gigantic map. TotK's map is even larger and ten times as homogenous. It's not even a new fricking map. What were they DOING for 6 years? I guess just polishing the shit out of the stupid gimmicky lego physics shit that 99% of players don't even bother with besides hoverbikes and gluing shit into bridges.
>2
I already named two in my post, and there are more. Captain, Flux, Maker, Soldier, and Ranger. >new colors are not new enemies
And I'm not claiming they are, I'm just pointing out how disingenuous it is to claim that there are a mere 10 new enemies. >Elden Ring has 150+ fricking unique enemies and dozens of unique bosses
"Unique" meaning what? They are reused all the time across the map and many are present in their earlier titles. >TotK's map is even larger and ten times more homogenous
I love Elden Ring, but it is clearly more monotonous. In TotK you have dozens of different ways to solve a task, in ER you swing your sword. Two different games with different playstyles aside, this is a moot point. >It's not even a new fricking map >what were they DOING for 6 years? >stupid gimmicky lego physics shit that 99% of players don't even bother with
Your memes won't make your point for you, homosexual.
What do you expect? Most modern games are lucky if they get 10 different enemy types, including bosses, period. This is ER all over again. That game has more enemy variety in the first Zone than most full games and yet people keep b***hing about a lack of enemy variety.
I didn't expect more from nu-nintendo. This is precisely the kind of lazy mediocrity I anticipated. That doesn't make it good. Elden Ring's problem is just that the map is too big. Get rid of the mountaintops and showfield and distribute what unique elements they have into the rest of the game and it would go to from very good to fantastic. TotK requires literal years more development to be worth its time or cost.
>I still think that the Sages are far more useful than the Champion abilities though.
Yeah, I agree with that. The only useful ones were Revali's gale and Urbosa's fury. Mipha's grace being an auto heal was nice but was basically a buffed fairy.
And Daruk's protection just couldn't do anything you couldn't already with a standard block.
I really wish you could alter their behaviour, like select wether you want them to attack or to hold them back. I hate having them frick with my battles
I love how there's always a checklist that gets posted when someone makes a critique of this game. No, that isn't enough like the anon said, especially given that there's two big maps and a pitiful amount of sky to traverse in. If anything, it makes the additions worse because they don't correlate with the areas you can travel. Why am I seeing Construct Fluxes and Taluses underground instead of more unique enemies like the Frox? The sky doesn't even have its own unique boss and the desert is still the best region because of the Molduga and now having gibdos roaming the area. It's like they didn't learn from the first game.
>I love that there's always a checklist
It was posted that way lol >Why am I seeing Construct Fluxes and Taluses underground instead of more unique enemies like the Frox?
You see all three of those underground, and there's a very clear explanation that the Zonai are an ancient civilization uncovered by the calamity at the beginning of the game, while Talus are literally just rocks so ofc they're gonna be underground >The sky doesn't even have its own unique boss
The Wind temple and Water temples don't count all of a sudden? >Desert is still the best region because [harder enemies]
It's pretty clear from the game's design that it is meant to be the last area cleared
>The Wind temple and Water temples don't count all of a sudden?
I didn't know I could find those individual bosses in the sky. You CAN find them underground, which isn't a bad thing, mind you. Try again. >It's pretty clear from the game's design that it is meant to be the last area cleared
And I did it before the water temple, so that's a moot point and only proves MY point; the desert tries to be unique and remains unique. If only they did that with the other regions.
>the sky has unique bosses >ackshually a boss must be encountered individually in a vacuum for it to count
Oh frick off with this stupid ass logic. If a boss is in the sky it's a boss that is unique to the sky. If you count the rematches in the Depths that's moronic. >I did it earlier, therefore the intended path is a moot point
Not really. It's like complaining that the hardest enemies are in Hyrule Castle. A zone having more unique enemies than others doesn't mean that all the other zones are bad.
There are like 4 cool sky islands, then there are the skydiving ones and the other ones are just variations of the same sky crosses with some shrine stone quest.
I just wish they cut the amount of sky islands in half if it meant having larger and more meaningful sky islands that you actually felt like exploring.
Also, skyward towers made it way too easy to get to sky islands. I kinda wish there was more of a feeling of figuring out how to get up there
I wish there were half as much sk
I'll be honest, that one sky island blueprint (the vaguely cross-shaped island with the device trader and the shrine and the rotate-able launcher in the center) felt like the most egregious case of reused content in the game.
I haven't been so hooked on a game since elden ring
The trick is to not get too excited and assume the developers will always frick up the most basic things. Barely anybody talks about how to use the hero skills you need to have them follow you around everywhere. The amount of times link has been like "I've just finished mining all this ore, please rito-sis blow all of this off a cliff for me" is infuriating. But I haven't loved a game the way I love this game for years (well elden ring). I LOVED the first long hours of botw, but after putting in many hours the cracks were too noticeable and I never enjoyed as much as I did initially. I haven't felt that from Totk. I've loved every dungeon. after having completed every dungeon I'm now too busy wanting to frick around to get on with the story, and replaying it doesn't seem as daunting as botw did
I'm a big OoT MM and gameboy fan, and Wind waker is my all time favourite game, I will always yearn for a zelda game with a more intimate smaller scale story and world, I will always hope for the return of that artwork and the best link in the series, and a return of the hookshot. But for a Ubishit game, Totk is a homerun
This game was so a disgrace. >Lol, vroom vroom, I can drive plywood now >OMG is that another korok? >Ya ha ha! >ANOHTER SRINE? >SO EXCIITE!
This puke was made for the tik tok generation
So what do I do now? I just found the last memory, have the master sword, and the quest to kill ganon. I've mostly ignored the world, so what's integral now? Finding the best armor pieces?
>Other games include changes to the map in DLCs.
This is false by the way, most games tend to opt for a sub map containing the dlc and it still doesn't bring as many new elements.
literally only the topography is unchanged, even completely ignoring the sky/depths:
every single location has been replaced with something new. The quests alone should tell anyone with a brain why this is a new game. "DLC" is nothing but a shitty Ganker meme.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Those could all have been added as DLC.
11 months ago
Anonymous
A new set of quests equal in content to the original game, that's a new game son that's a fact. Your opinion on the matter means nothing nor does the DLC meme no matter how hard you losers scream it. Maybe try pointing out an actual flaw like the dungeons being too easy.
I just wish the ending was better. I wanted to see the rebuilding of Hyrule. Instead we just got an Avengers after credits scene like there's going to be a BotW 3 or something. God I hope not, I love these games but I'm done with wastleland Hyrule.
It would have been really nice to carry on playing with updated dialogue and Zelda in the world visiting various locations, like her fixed garden. It kinda sucks that all you can do is peace out and teleport somewhere, especially considering the sages are supposed to be right behind you fighting giant monsters.
>We're here! Don't worry hero, we'll handle these beasts, you go save the world! >Uhhh actually guys I'm just checking my bag here and I gotta go stew some tomatoes, catch you back in town? *zweoooop*
I like it but not as much as BotW back when it came out. And I still struggle to finish TotK because going through the same stuff is annoying. Definitely NOT a GOTY material
The underground completely sucks ass. People shitpost about BOTW’s overworld being empty but they are wrong, there’s always new biomes to see and new quests to do. The underground is what a genuinely empty game world looks like, there is nothing there aside from one quest with Koga. Every area looks the same and full of copypaste. You casually stumble on chests containing lore breaking former amibo shit in the middle of nowhere down there. If it wasn’t for the quickbuild and extra batteries being down there nobody would go there.
Its funny I hated the underground initially but it's really grown on me, its ASMRy, just make your way turning on the lights, fighting high level mobs and getting materials to power up your batteries
Exploring and upgrading Link over time was fun, but some armor upgrades should be less grindy.
The new temples are a step up from BotW, but aren't as good as older Zelda games.
The underground section feels pointlessly large with too little to do unless you really have a craving for zonai shit and nostalgia armor.
Melee combat still isn't that fun due to how slow Link is, so playing with the bow as if the game was a budget Dragon's Dogma was significantly more fun than actually running up to hit things.
I had fun but I also didn't do everything in the game because a lot of the side content doesn't feel worth doing. Once again, I feel an open world game is too big for its own good and actively detracts from the potential fun of a game. Yes, there's a lot to do, but not all of it is meaningful or particularly exciting and fun.
Also I shot Ganondorf to death with bomb arrows because frick you it's fun.
botw was an interesting game cause it changed the zelda formula for the first time in almost 30 years
totk is weird because instead of doing what botw did and drastically changed the formula, it decided to play it safe and just iterate on botw while not adding that much. I just feel more conflicted on totk than I did botw and it's hard to fully describe why
>I just feel more conflicted on totk than I did botw and it's hard to fully describe why
Because BotW was a fresh new spin on Zelda, plus it was more reserved when it came to making changes. With TotK all reservations went straight out the window because BotW was the successful "test game".
BotW was a drastic shift, but it felt like a Zelda sequel. TotK doesnt feel like a Zelda sequel, it feels like a BotW sequel. A very important distinction to make. The Nuts and Bolts shit doesnt make sense for a Zelda sequel, but it does make sense for a BotW sequel. The new standard.
It's the exact same shit that happened with God of War 2018 and Ragnarok. 2018 was the risky new direction so it had a more classic GoW feel to it to not piss fans off. With Ragnarok they had proven the new direction was successful, so they just stopped even pretending this was old GoW anymore and went very hard on the Marvel movie ARPG shit.
Companies got smart and realized you gotta boil the frog slowly basically.
Eveything takes so fricking long to do in this game. >find little bokoromoto seed >it wants to be with its friend >start building craft that will take it up the cliff >half way up >it snags on the wall and breaks >out of parts >frick >have to go get new ones >start making my way over there >realize I’m simultaneously bored and annoyed >turn the game off
They didn't have to worry about it because they know they've cultivated apple/disney tier morons who'll slurp up whatever they put out without question, ruining it for everyone else.
It's genuinely worse to actually play than BotW even if the content on offer is more substantial. They just made everything a bigger chore.
You defended the troony moon.
11 months ago
Anonymous
this sad dumb Black person never watched Nerrel
11 months ago
Anonymous
Tendies know nothing but goyslop so they’ll praise the shit nintendo shoves down their throats
>What did they spend all that time making?
Literally nothing anon, just a little photoshop to change up the cover a little. You can go away now
I played when it leaked and when I finished the tutorial, I realized I didn't want to replay breath of the wild and stopped and haven't played it since.
I never felt like i was progressing. Chest rewards were always small and inconsequential, so i began to just ignore puzzles for them and ran past them instead. I never found any cool or unique items/weapons through exploring outside of some armor that doesnt even do anything but raise or lower my stats. Quickly became starved for literally anything new, but it never happened.
I’m just surprised with how same-y everything looks and feels. With BotW at least they had the excuse that they had to build the entire engine and all the assets from scratch.
With TotK it should have been easy to pour everything into world design and dungeons. Everything else was already done. They had five years to craft a story, music, bosses, dungeons. What did they spend all that time making?
They didn't have to worry about it because they know they've cultivated apple/disney tier morons who'll slurp up whatever they put out without question, ruining it for everyone else.
>What did they spend all that time making?
A story, new music, bosses, dungeons, enemies, shrines, fusion interactions, zonai items, new areas in the overworld, new armor, old enemy redesigns, the depths
The good part of BotW was the emergent sandbox shit and that's what they doubled down on with the fusions and building. And that shit takes an unimaginable amount of time to program and test to get working even half-decently.
I played BotW years ago and it didn't appeal to me at all. Stopped playing sometime after doing the second sacred beast or whatever.
This emergent gameplay shit just isn't for me. I much prefer more streamlined, tailored experiences. I'm glad for the autists who get to take a break from programming supercomputers using redstone in Minecraft to play with a new sandbox, I guess.
I loved it. But what annoyed me was the grind for armor upgrades and the fricking champions following you. It's just a mess to select the right power when the sob is doing god knows why somewhere on the battlefield or if you can't see shit because he's in the way
yeah i really loved it when it leaked but now looking back the feeling is best described as being disillusioned
don't get me wrong it's still good but now i feel mildly embarrassed for insisting it's amazing
If the game were any good it'd stand on its own and wouldn't have people chimping out defending it. They do it only because they feel compelled to for autistic brand loyalty reasons.
Spam, deliberately instigating fights, never once actually seriously considering anyone else to be sentient and yet continuing to abuse threads with his presence, recycling arguments that have been disproven hundreds of times over, generally failing to understand the idea that different from him does not mean wrong, not functioning as a human being, abhorrent debate tactics like transmission of guilt, the belief that all of reality revolves around him and anything that offends him was meant as an insult directly to him, holding insane hardline beliefs that in no way correlate to reality, projecting his childish reasons for playing games onto everyone
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Spam
Calling people trannies for 100 posts is fine though?
>deliberately instigating fights
So why is it okay to call people snoys at the drop of a hat?
>never once actually seriously considering anyone else to be sentient
Most people outside of Ganker are glorified NPCs. How is this wrong?
> recycling arguments that have been disproven hundreds of times over
And yet, when prompted, nobody can bring up these refutations.
>generally failing to understand the idea that different from him does not mean wrong
Something that's never been done on Ganker before, right?
>abhorrent debate tactics like transmission of guilt
If someone is spamming a thread and calling everyone trannies, shouldn't you at least say something like "that guy doesn't speak for me"? A simple sentence is too much to type, I guess.
>the belief that all of reality revolves around him and anything that offends him was meant as an insult directly to him,
And what's the alternative? Just being a cuck who never asks for anything?
>holding insane hardline beliefs that in no way correlate to reality,
Oh yeah, such as "i wish games ran at 60 FPS" and "i wish this game had a little less story". Defcon 1 right there!
>projecting his childish reasons for playing games onto everyone
HAVING FUN? WTF THAT'S CHILDISH, GROW UP!
11 months ago
Anonymous
>If someone is spamming a thread and calling everyone trannies, shouldn't you at least say something like "that guy doesn't speak for me"?
No. You shouldn't. EXPECTING that is literally more mentally ill than the person spamming trannies. What about this don't you get? Nobody speaks for anyone else. That's the fricking default. Unless someone is agreeing with someone else vocally, don't assume their arguments are connected. Jesus fricking christ. >And what's the alternative?
Realizing that no game is made specifically to get a reaction out of you? Jesus fricking christ.
This is why people don't take you seriously, ACgay.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Unless someone is agreeing with someone else vocally, don't assume their arguments are connected. Jesus fricking christ.
When most Nintendo fans in a thread reply to the troony spammer with posts like "based" and "snoys btfo" then yes, you do agree with them. Also refusing to consider them shitposters doesn't help. Notice how not a single Nintendo fan has called out the tranner spammer ITT, even though it would take a simple sentence.
>Realizing that no game is made specifically to get a reaction out of you? >IMPLYING blatant political propaganda doesn't exist >implying trash like Gone Home isn't the vidya equivalent of clickbait >implying the majority of AAA games aren't just virtue signaling and attempts at subversive advertising
11 months ago
Anonymous
>blahblahblah EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD EXISTS RELATIVE TO ME AND IF IT ISN'T ABOUT ME THEN IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!
11 months ago
Anonymous
>EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD EXISTS RELATIVE TO ME AND IF IT ISN'T ABOUT ME THEN IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!
Now you're getting it.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>I-I'm the chad because I believe something utterly insane, look at how based I am >I'm totally better than people spamming troony!!!
11 months ago
Anonymous
>spends a decade of his life seething about Zelda on a hentai pedo board.
Now you're getting it. Come back tomorrow and cry some more.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Correction
a decade of his life seething about Zelda, Metroid, Splatoon and Xeno on a hentai pedo board while posting softcore porn to claim that fans are posting it.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>while posting softcore porn to claim that fans are posting it.
So why is it that femboy link threads and zelda dragussy threads practically reach bump limit? Am I somehow singlehandedly keeping every single one of those threads alive? Am the one commissioning thousands of artists to make femboy link porn? Am I somehow able to keep up 50 threads of porn spam, simultaneously, every single moment of the day? And riddle me this: how many of these threads are called out as falseflags, if they are indeed falseflags?
just out of curiosity.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Am I somehow able to keep up 50 threads of porn spam, simultaneously
Given they occur one at a time and are deleted fairly quickly you don't have to worry about that
11 months ago
Anonymous
Ooh, let me guess. Am I also the one singlehandedly bumping the Zelink thread on /vg/? The one that's just softcore porn spam?
>Yes, it is.
NO, it ISN'T. It's not about how good the game is, it's about you taking every game as being made specifically for you. No dev has ever thought about you when making their game.
>NO, it ISN'T. It's not about how good the game is, it's about you taking every game as being made specifically for you.
why shouldn't every game be made for me?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>why shouldn't every game be made for me?
Because at least 24% of humanity is sentient, and therefore worthy of attention and effort.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Because at least 24% of humanity is sentient, and therefore worthy of attention and effort.
If even 10% of the world was sentient, we wouldn't be in such a trash fire of a civilization.
>what console am I supposedly shitposting in favor of?
I didn't say you were supporting one and frankly it doesn't matter. Having a bias against a game and platform is still console warring.
>You refuse to acknolwedge that the image was fake
Unfortunately for you that's not how the English language works, or any language for that matter. You don't have to openly state something obvious that can be inferred from the conversation.
The fact that I tried to verify it and came up with the conclusion that they're under different hashes and it's impossible to find them all is more than enough.
>Did you verify before believing?
I don't think I need to give this a real response, unless you lack the ability to infer you should know the answer.
>Ah yes, the same idiocy as the "y-you're the one spamming porn" poster
So you're the anon being accused of being the porn poster and you made this post then [...]
The one saying you're unable to juggle multiple posts despite the fact that you're juggling multiple posts right now?
I may actually believe the anon about you being a porn spammer into hat case. After all spamming porn would be a lot easier than actually coming up with responses.
>Having a bias against a game and platform is still console warring.
And why would you assume that? Do you think I hate Nintendo, or their games? I may dislike a good portion of their library, but I will also cede praise when necessary. You want a console that I have a genuine bias against, look no further than the snoystation. Whereas a Nintendo game will occasionally garner a high 7/10 score from me, I can't even remember the last time snoy put out anything higher than a 3/10, which is being generous. So I'll at least admit that. I hate sony, especially for killing off so many good IPs for Unsharted and God of Soi.
>You don't have to openly state something obvious that can be inferred from the conversation.
And the conversation stated that I was the only person who disproved the image. Everyone else was willing to believe it. Tell me, why did you wait for me to do the footwork and go into the archive, just to prove that the image was wrong?
>The fact that I tried to verify it and came up with the conclusion that they're under different hashes and it's impossible to find them all is more than enough.
Then I offer you a challenge. Show me every single variation of that image ever made, and prove that it goes beyond 15 pages.
>I don't think I need to give this a real response
Quite clearly you do.
>The one saying you're unable to juggle multiple posts despite the fact that you're juggling multiple posts right now?
Anon, I'm posting in one thread, taking several minutes between posts so I can type. This a little different than regularly getting zelink porn dumps to autosage within an hour, which I'm pretty sure isn't even possible from a single person, unless it was extremely obvious, so the fans should easily call it out as a samegay.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>a-actually, no, nobody but me is worth catering to
Now watch, your next line is "NOW YOU GET IT!!!!!!"
How in the world can you claim you're just trying to have a reasonable conversation when you enter every thread of the genuine belief that you are earth's sole sentient human being? You can't have a reasonable conversation with people you consider subhuman. You said you'd try and improve last time I saw you, now I see that was a fricking lie.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I'm trying to be reasonable, anon. But what am I supposed to say to people who think that it's okay to spam "troonytroonytroony" for 500 posts, or that it's okay to dump softcore porn for a whole thread and drown out discussion? When I'm called a homosexual because I don't care about graphics, by a fandom that also doesn't care about graphics, that strikes me as hypocritical. Why should I have any tolerance for that?
>hah, Nintendo games don't need realistic graphics, they have soul >EWWW YOU PLAY INDIE GAMES, GET THAT GAY troony PIXELSHIT OUT OF HERE
This is reasonable to you?
There is no story that hits you with "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying".
None. Ever.
I don't care that you're trying to make some sort of illustrative point. I don't care what kind of point you think you're making. You have made it clear that THIS is actually what you LIVE THROUGH when a game has characters and a story. This is proof that you are INTENSELY DELUSIONAL. To the point of hallucinations.
>There is no story that hits you with "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying".
I was gonna say that it was an exxaggeration, but if anything your average Metal Gear installment and JRPG is an understatement of such.
11 months ago
Anonymous
ACsnoy, why do you worship moviegames like nu-gow?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>you think it's okay because you don't make the thread worse by seething about and engaging with the schizo who spams troony at everything
Not how it works.
Likewise, the one guy who shat on Terraria to spite you is a rabid BOTW defender. Nobody in their right mind actually thinks he's sane, but nobody is going to call him out because that would be deliberately engaging with a schizo.
>NO NO NO, I ACTUALLY UNDERSTATED IT, WHEN I SEE A CHARACTER OPEN THEIR MOUTH AND NOT JUST TO GIVE ME THE NEXT OBJECTIVE I GO INTO A POCKET DIMENSION WHERE I WITNESS 100 HOURS OF WAIFU SOBBING
Stop it. Actually talk about the game that exists in this world and not in your delusional mind.
Who is ACgay? What is AC? Assassin’s Creed?
Armored Core. Not that he actually likes Armored Core, it's just a game he makes noise about pretending to like because it at one point sort of fit his ideal of "no story" if you crossed your eyes.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Why do you worship trannies and moviegames, ACsnoy?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Not how it works.
Look at this thread and how much of a dumpster fire it is, because they won't even acknowledge the troony poster as a problem.
>Stop it. Actually talk about the game that exists in this world and not in your delusional mind.
Every time I discuss the problems with the story, people jump to call me a troony because, again, they can't handle criticism.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Look at this thread and how much of a dumpster fire it is
because of snoytrannies like you
11 months ago
Anonymous
Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism
Reading this thread, not really.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>how much of a dumpster fire it is, because they won't even acknowledge the troony poster
You are doing more damage to the thread than the troony poster. >Every time I discuss the problems with the story
No amount of discussion warrants a complete break from reality.
[...] >doesn't understand sarcasm
No wonder you guys hate kaizo games so much.
[...] >Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
maybe 95%, yes. And the 5% are a coincidence.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Am I also the one singlehandedly bumping the Zelink thread on /vg/?
I didn't even know about that but if you're lurking there then shit dude you're the link between the spam.
11 months ago
Anonymous
All I know is that they spammed their crap here, until the mods banished them to /vg/. again, not a single person called them out. If it was a falseflag, prove it.
>why shouldn't every game be made for me?
Because your idea of a good video game is terrible.
My idea of a video game is one where the gameplay is given 100% importance, none of this "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying! 10/10 masterpiece!"
11 months ago
Anonymous
>My idea of a video game is one where the gameplay is given 100% importance, none of this "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying! 10/10 masterpiece!"
Rewards aren't gameplay, ACsnoy
11 months ago
Anonymous
There is no story that hits you with "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying".
None. Ever.
I don't care that you're trying to make some sort of illustrative point. I don't care what kind of point you think you're making. You have made it clear that THIS is actually what you LIVE THROUGH when a game has characters and a story. This is proof that you are INTENSELY DELUSIONAL. To the point of hallucinations.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>why shouldn't every game be made for me?
Because your idea of a good video game is terrible.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Notice how not a single Nintendo fan has called out the tranner spammer ITT, even though it would take a simple sentence.
Let me ask you this Doug, why would anyone even acknowledge it period if that's what they want?
11 months ago
Anonymous
You don't have to reply to it, just acknowledge that it's bad. Might be a good idea to r*port it to the jannies while you're at it, but at least show that you don't support it.
>I-I'm the chad because I believe something utterly insane, look at how based I am >I'm totally better than people spamming troony!!!
>I-I'm the chad because I believe something utterly insane, look at how based I am
Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece? That's wacky and absurd?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece?
No, the idea that literally everything the entire world does is done just to evoke some kind of reaction from you.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Maybe devs should stop making the vidya equivalent of clickbait.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's not the devs' fault that you mistake literally every game for a personal call-out.
It's not the anons' fault that you mistake literally every thread for a personal call-out.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>It's not the devs' fault that you mistake literally every game for a personal call-out.
Yes, it is. Next time make better games.
>Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece?
Literally nobody here has said its a 10/10 masterpiece Numerical scores are moronic but to play this game I'd say ToTK is the closest to a 10/10 since elden ring and nobody cares that you don't like it, we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion. You're playing ball with yourself idiot. And of course we're gonna reply to you, it doesn't get in the way of discussing the game, but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
>we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion.
Accusing me of being eric, being a troony, being a snoy, and tons of other insults would imply this exact thing, so maybe there's a hint of truth to it.
>but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
I enjoy many games, but you call them all because they're not popular enough, and they don't have a high enough metacritic score.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Yes, it is.
NO, it ISN'T. It's not about how good the game is, it's about you taking every game as being made specifically for you. No dev has ever thought about you when making their game.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece?
Literally nobody here has said its a 10/10 masterpiece Numerical scores are moronic but to play this game I'd say ToTK is the closest to a 10/10 since elden ring and nobody cares that you don't like it, we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion. You're playing ball with yourself idiot. And of course we're gonna reply to you, it doesn't get in the way of discussing the game, but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
11 months ago
Anonymous
>You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece? That's wacky and absurd?
No not at all. You're entitled your opinion. If I don't like a game I tend not to give a frick about it and concentrate on games I DO like.
But here you are, in YEAR SEVEN of your Zelda meltdown. Who are you trying to convince? What a schizo.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>No not at all. You're entitled your opinion. If I don't like a game I tend not to give a frick about it and concentrate on games I DO like. >goes out of his way to call my favorite game "furtroony pixel dogshit" across countless threads
11 months ago
Anonymous
>just acknowledge that it's bad.
Which is giving it attention. I would suggest people do the same to you but we all know that you're not here for the sake of attention but to flaunt your own stupidity. >Might be a good idea to r*port it to the jannies while you're at it, but at least show that you don't support it.
In other words what you want to see is something like thus >>#7377294 posts troony nonsense >>#7736483 I do not approve of #7377294 so I will say it publicly here is my screenshot of my report even though announcing reports could get me banned >original anon continues to spam troony nonsense and the anon who announced his report is banned.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Which is giving it attention.
And yet calling the poster based and supporting it is fine? Because that's what you're doing right now.
>>#7377294 posts troony nonsense >>#7736483 I do not approve of #7377294
Yes, that's exactly what I want to see. You don't have to announce your report, but show that you care.
>b-but that's just giving him what he wants
And replying to him, saying that he's based is even worse. And yet you have no problem doing that.
Yes, but Barry is the only one who’s actually real. He shitposts in the Final Fantasy threads.
He’s obsessed with Final Fantasy XV, a game which is generally agreed to have been a mediocre letdown for a mainline Final Fantasy game, and was unironically hyped for Forspoken, which was an absolute trainwreck. He outed himself on gamefaqs and Twitter and frequently shitposts in VII Remake and XVI threads.
Don’t believe me? Check the archives.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/625386790/
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640453324/#640464515
If the game were any good it'd stand on its own and wouldn't have people chimping out defending it. They do it only because they feel compelled to for autistic brand loyalty reasons.
>spamming every thread
Literally impossible, look at the spam, LOOK AT IT, 15+ PAGES, mods had to ban this image, in fact they thought for a moment somebody set an AI to post them but no, it was a very autistic troony
Not him but look at this
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/gq3mc48_kJB3eBvRlfcr4g/
The guy has it saved under different hashes and filenames. You can't gather them all in a single search.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I want the one with 15+ pages.
11 months ago
Anonymous
That's what I'm trying to do.
Because that anon isn't saying anything I have to try and search it myself but what I'm saying is that we aren't finding all of them.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>That's what I'm trying to do.
You shouldn't bother because it doesn't exist. There is no way someone posted the same image that many times, and the only person calling him out is someone unwilling to post the archive link (I'm not referring to you btw).
11 months ago
Anonymous
>There is no way someone posted the same image that many times,
You'd be surprised at how dedicated anti-Nintendo posters are look at this for instance
*blocks your path*
Nothing personnel, kid.
It was rarely posted at one point but once it was used to force a boogeyman it just exploded.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Let me guess, the anon screaming erictroony is an anti-Nintendo poster as well, right?
You do see that there are different filenames there, right? I'm sure there IS an autist spamming that stuff don't get me wrong, but there's clearly other people posting that image too. Using your method I can also go to b4k and google a reaction image like pic related and then show the results with different filenames and say "this is all posted by the same person"
Thats a reaction image. It got posted everytime you seethed about BotW.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>There is no way someone posted the same image that many times,
You'd be surprised at how dedicated anti-Nintendo posters are look at this for instance [...]
It was rarely posted at one point but once it was used to force a boogeyman it just exploded.
Meanwhile you literally lie about archive links. 🙂
Sucks for you that I know how to use the archive.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Dishonestly using the search function in the archive to suit his narrative
Eric...stop, it's embracing, just move on
11 months ago
Anonymous
>STOP DEBOONKING MY FALSE CLAIMS!
11 months ago
Anonymous
Like I said, different variations of the image exist.
It's almost impossible to get them all in one search
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/1N2CqL0oXLCgbBMWItRpEA/
11 months ago
Anonymous
And this variation https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/ZC0gtBHmr6DYCZhDrHIG7Q/
11 months ago
Anonymous
The full image
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/aDhM7NOfRKHUE1XR8HRuQQ/
This edit
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/kSTlRZVnr2cHiiDPeKeqg/
The original screenshot
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/AGkZpP1qU9fB3mLqHwYf0w/
[...]
[...]
[...]
That's not even the problem here. You made a false claim and then refused to back it up. All of those variations combined don't even come close to the supposed 15+ pages shown here[...]
And you're still not explaining the criteria that you used for that particular search, if it even exists. If the problem was truly this bad, you wouldn't need to fabricate evidence out of thin air.
>You made a false claim and then refused to back it up.
Except I didn't as you can see here
That's what I'm trying to do.
Because that anon isn't saying anything I have to try and search it myself but what I'm saying is that we aren't finding all of them.
I was trying to find what that anon searched in the first place out of curiosity. Along the way you began to deny the spam so now I'm posting my findings so far.
It's not 15 pages but it's more than enough to say that that the image has been spammed since it was made. That's undeniable.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>It's not 15 pages but it's more than enough
No, it's not enough. If the initial image cannot be backed up, then the claim gets discarded. That means there needs to be 15+ pages of ONE image being spammed. That was the claim made.
The whole crap about "b-but what about other images" is meaningless in this conversation, because the image stated that only one image was enough to garner 15+ pages.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>ayo this gameplay be lit yo
>in any competent game, this would take 5 seconds >in TOTK it takes 40 seconds because....?
Ericsubhuman, why are you so desperate?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>If the initial image cannot be backed up
That's a moot point to make since the point now isn't the image but the act of spamming.
You wouldn't claim that people didn't spam the AloyCado images just because there are multiple variants would you?
Not to mention just about every single post is the same.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>That's a moot point to make since the point now isn't the image but the act of spamming.
Then show the spamming, don't fabricate an image and then try and pass it off as legitimate.
>You wouldn't claim that people didn't spam the AloyCado images just because there are multiple variants would you?
I would be able to back it up without making a fake image. I would also link to the archive for proof.
see
*blocks your path*
Nothing personnel, kid.
THIS is how you actually link to the archive, with something that can actually be verifiably backed up. And if you think the image is fake, watch as I do the unthinkable and *gasp* back it up with proof.
>Then show the spamming,
So showing you consistent anti-zelda spam using variations and edits of the same images under different hashes being used for the same purpose isn't proof?
Care to explain your stance? Because everyone would consider that an extreme case of spam.
Like these for example
https://arch.b4k.co/_/search/image/aDhM7NOfRKHUE1XR8HRuQQ/
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/Ue-sQ9JGwWVo3PCGQ9HwWg/
>I would be able to back it up without making a fake image
Neither of us know if it's fake because neither of us know what that anon posted but that's not the point anymore, the point is that the spam you're denying is real.
>THIS is how you actually link to the archive
In other words you're doing exactly what I'm doing with the only difference being that there aren't multiple edits and hashes showing that there isn't an actual effort to spam regularly.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>So showing you consistent anti-zelda spam using variations and edits of the same images under different hashes being used for the same purpose isn't proof?
No, it isn't, because it's not what was shown in the image. Note that both of your examples aren't even two pages long, combined.
>Neither of us know if it's fake because neither of us know what that anon posted but that's not the point anymore,
That's always been the point. Look, you and I both know that snoys are obnoxious. You didn't need to make a fake archive image to prove that. I could've just showed you years of golden sony wojak anal vore and nintendonion images. But I don't need to make fake images just to prove it. The person who made that image lied, and then attempted to backtrack by saying "w-well if you put all these images together, then it's basically the same!". It's not the same.
You could've shown screencaps of all the different variations of images. You could've shown the NTR cuck spam. That would've proven the point. but you chose to falsify an image and hope that nobody would call you out on it. I do not tolerate that in any capacity.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>because it's not what was shown in the image
We've long since passed the point where that was the argument. Once again, you denied the spam outright. >Note that both of your examples aren't even two pages long,
Anon, they're never going to be because they are changed regularly to deter people from searching them all in the archive. These links I'm posting are just a handful I can find because of that.
That's how searching for evidence works.
>That's always been the point.
No, it hasn't, if it was I would have simply accepted the fact that I wouldn't be able to find them all in a single search and been on my way, but now we've gotten to the point where you're downplaying the reality of the spam in these threads and that's just sheer idiocy.
>but you chose to falsify an image
At this point I'm beginning to think that you're the one who did it in the first place given the anon who made the image just stopped posting. It would fit your current MO.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>We've long since passed the point where that was the argument. Once again, you denied the spam outright.
I wouldn't deny it if you were honest and didn't feel the need to make fake images. All you had to do was, from the outset, show the different images being spammed. That would've been fine. Because the image was a fakery, and the poster refused to just own up to it, now I have just cause to refuse to believe anything else.
>Anon, they're never going to be because they are changed regularly to deter people from searching them all in the archive.
Then what was the criteria used to make the image? Why did you feel the need to make a forgery?
>if it was I would have simply accepted the fact that I wouldn't be able to find them all in a single search and been on my way, but now we've gotten to the point where you're downplaying the reality of the spam in these threads and that's just sheer idiocy.
Tell you what, I'll gladly acknowledge the spammers and shitposters, if you apologize for that fake image. Whether you made it or not, whether you posted it or not, just take responsibility and apologize. Show me that you will argue in good faith.
>At this point I'm beginning to think that you're the one who did it in the first place given the anon who made the image just stopped posting.
If i was the one who did it under the guise of falseflagging, then you'd have even more reason to discard it as a shitpost. Why defend it?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>If i was the one who did it under the guise of falseflagging, then you'd have even more reason to discard it as a shitpost
Simple, because I like to verify things with my own to eyes rather than believing or denying on a whim.
Also the fact that you're trying your hardest to paint me as the creator of the image shows that you have an agenda here.
You most likely made it superficially to force this narrative of self victimisation, but the problem is that there's more than enough legitimate spam one can dig up that it ultimate looks bad on you when you deny it all AND paint someone unrelated as the creator of the fake.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Simple, because I like to verify things with my own to eyes rather than believing or denying on a whim.
Then you should be on my side, decrying the image as a fakery. That doesn't mean spammers don't exist, just that this particular image is the equivalent of clickbait.
>Also the fact that you're trying your hardest to paint me as the creator of the image shows that you have an agenda here.
Whether you made it or not, all you have to do is apologize for it. After all, you 100% believed the image until I came along and pointed out that it was fake. You refused to do your own research.
>You most likely made it superficially to force this narrative of self victimisation, but the problem is that there's more than enough legitimate spam one can dig up that it ultimate looks bad on you
THEN YOU DIDN'T NEED TO MAKE A FAKE IMAGE. You could've used all of that instead of trying to pull a fast one.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>you should be on my side
No, looking at this conversation alone facts don't matter to you. You're here simply for the console war shitposting but want to maintain the air of intelligence rather than acting like a buffoon like your standard >REEEEEEE TENDIES
poster.
After all, if you weren't you wouldn't be trying your hardest to say I was the creator of the image.
>all you have to do is apologize for it.
By your reasoning you would have to apologise to me. Not only for believing I created it but also assuming I immediately believed it when the objective was to verify BEFORE believing.
>THEN YOU DIDN'T NEED TO MAKE A FAKE IMAGE
You're right, I wouldn't, but you would to force your narrative. You're far too invested in this for someone that wasn't targeted personally you know.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>You're here simply for the console war shitposting
That's cute. Tell me, what console am I supposedly shitposting in favor of?
>After all, if you weren't you wouldn't be trying your hardest to say I was the creator of the image.
Like you say, at this point it doesn't even matter. You refuse to acknolwedge that the image was fake, because some other crap that's not relevant.
>By your reasoning you would have to apologise to me. Not only for believing I created it but also assuming I immediately believed it when the objective was to verify BEFORE believing.
Did you verify before believing?
>You're right, I wouldn't, but you would to force your narrative.
Ah yes, the same idiocy as the "y-you're the one spamming porn" poster. I didn't realize I had so much money that I could afford thousands of IPs and computers, all capable of posting at the exact same time.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>what console am I supposedly shitposting in favor of?
I didn't say you were supporting one and frankly it doesn't matter. Having a bias against a game and platform is still console warring.
>You refuse to acknolwedge that the image was fake
Unfortunately for you that's not how the English language works, or any language for that matter. You don't have to openly state something obvious that can be inferred from the conversation.
The fact that I tried to verify it and came up with the conclusion that they're under different hashes and it's impossible to find them all is more than enough.
>Did you verify before believing?
I don't think I need to give this a real response, unless you lack the ability to infer you should know the answer.
>Ah yes, the same idiocy as the "y-you're the one spamming porn" poster
So you're the anon being accused of being the porn poster and you made this post then
>while posting softcore porn to claim that fans are posting it.
So why is it that femboy link threads and zelda dragussy threads practically reach bump limit? Am I somehow singlehandedly keeping every single one of those threads alive? Am the one commissioning thousands of artists to make femboy link porn? Am I somehow able to keep up 50 threads of porn spam, simultaneously, every single moment of the day? And riddle me this: how many of these threads are called out as falseflags, if they are indeed falseflags?
just out of curiosity.
The one saying you're unable to juggle multiple posts despite the fact that you're juggling multiple posts right now?
I may actually believe the anon about you being a porn spammer into hat case. After all spamming porn would be a lot easier than actually coming up with responses.
11 months ago
Anonymous
And this variation https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/ZC0gtBHmr6DYCZhDrHIG7Q/
I mean I still see either this exact image or minor variations of it literally every single day on here, it feels like. Same for the "smug Zelda next to counter" image.
This game is just shitpost after shitpost after shitpost. Sick of it.
Why this civil war over the fricking Lego car game?
snoys are extremely mentally ill and obsessed, that's why.
That's not even the problem here. You made a false claim and then refused to back it up. All of those variations combined don't even come close to the supposed 15+ pages shown here
>spamming every thread
Literally impossible, look at the spam, LOOK AT IT, 15+ PAGES, mods had to ban this image, in fact they thought for a moment somebody set an AI to post them but no, it was a very autistic troony
And you're still not explaining the criteria that you used for that particular search, if it even exists. If the problem was truly this bad, you wouldn't need to fabricate evidence out of thin air.
I don't understand this obsessive contrarian butthurt over this particular game, anyway. Did any other game ever illicit a similar reaction?
I'd understand if this game was broken, annoyingly pretentious or genuinely just worse than its immediate predecessor, but the worst I could say about this game is that it's hailed as the best game of all time when it's genuinely bland as shit sometimes, which isn't unique to this game, within or without its series.
>3 posts >on different threads >THOSE ARE NOT THE SAME SCHIZO CREATING THE SAME FRICKING THREAD WITH THE SAME IMAGE100+ TIMES
Try harder Eric
It's a falseflag. The image posted here
>spamming every thread
Literally impossible, look at the spam, LOOK AT IT, 15+ PAGES, mods had to ban this image, in fact they thought for a moment somebody set an AI to post them but no, it was a very autistic troony
is a lie. Unlike that bumbling buffoon, I'll even show you the archive link so you can check for yourself.
I mean I still see either this exact image or minor variations of it literally every single day on here, it feels like. Same for the "smug Zelda next to counter" image.
This game is just shitpost after shitpost after shitpost. Sick of it.
Why this civil war over the fricking Lego car game?
11 months ago
Anonymous
snoys are extremely mentally ill and obsessed, that's why.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Like clockwork.
11 months ago
Anonymous
ssssh, nobody tell him
11 months ago
Anonymous
>ayo this gameplay be lit yo
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Hey, could you please help me putting a roof over the stable? >Sure >done
I fail to see your point?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>in any competent game, this would take 5 seconds >in TOTK it takes 40 seconds because....?
11 months ago
Anonymous
it's a troonylator bug.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>>in any competent game, this would take 5 seconds
sped up for your sanity
11 months ago
Anonymous
That's your mistake. You posted a snoy movie, not a video game.
I still have no clue who the frick eric is and whether its a dig at Totk fans or at the idiot spamming this thread. I can't wait for Metroid Prime, Metroid threads have this ability to avoid this kind of derailment, usually they get derailed into porn discussions which are more productive than whatever the frick this is
11 months ago
Anonymous
Erictroony, why are you lying?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Erictroony
WHAT THE FRICK IS ERIC AND WHO EXACTLY ARE YOU EVEN INSULTING
>It's not the devs' fault that you mistake literally every game for a personal call-out.
Yes, it is. Next time make better games.
[...] >we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion.
Accusing me of being eric, being a troony, being a snoy, and tons of other insults would imply this exact thing, so maybe there's a hint of truth to it.
>but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
I enjoy many games, but you call them all because they're not popular enough, and they don't have a high enough metacritic score.
>Accusing me of being eric
This is a rogue agent with no country, he just wants to see the world burn
11 months ago
Anonymous
Shit thread tbh >Totk is perfect in every way >No it's not >Omg acgay is here everyone
Literally read what the frick you're even saying you homosexuals
Erictroony, why are you still seething?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Erictroony-schizo, why are you so obsessed with someone who doesn’t exist?
[...]
Erictroony, why do you worship subhumans?
what is even going on
11 months ago
Anonymous
A schizo having a meltdown because he can’t fathom that a bunch of people on Ganker don’t like BotW or TotK. He’s been screaming about this “Eric” for literally an entire year. Check the archives for “Erictroony”. More than 80% of the posts are from the same schizo crying wolf in this thread.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/text/Erictroony/page/37/
You don't even care about the game. You are just utterly fricking seething that Nintendo fans have YET ANOTHER masterpiece to call their own. The thought of them having fun makes you choke with rage.
Thank you for confirming that TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games of all time though. Nice self-own.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Damn, are you mad over me stating simple facts?
Your smug folder reaction picture dump is working against you lilsis. >Thank you for confirming that TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games
For sure, it's 90+. I think there's what, over 10,000 games with over a 90+ metacritic? ToTK for sure will be amongst those.
All I'm saying, is that Witcher 3, RDR2, GTA IV, GTA V, Skyrim, Elden Ring are all more commercially and critically acclaimed than your game.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Erictroony, why are you lying?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>All I'm saying, is that Witcher 3, RDR2, GTA IV, GTA V, Skyrim, Elden Ring are all more commercially and critically acclaimed than your game
literally nobody cares, those who do don't matter, and most people enjoying this game have also enjoyed most of those games, we're not stuck in that child mentality of "my team is better than yours" but my childhood team is better than yours, they do everything possible to be hated yet they still pump out excellently crafted fun games on the regular instead of making movies and corporate nightmares
11 months ago
Anonymous
>literally nobody cares, those who do don't matter,
More people seem to care about those games hence why they all dwarf anyone game in the entire Zelda franchise sales wise.
>that spoiler
And based on that, i'm guessing you also care too. Sorry, not gigachad Rockstars, Bethesda, Fromsoft or CDPRs fault that Nintendo literally CAN'T compete in the open world genre
11 months ago
Anonymous
Erictroony, why are you lying?
You literally posted wrong numbers.
Its OK, traversal around the floating islands is very fun. However the game lacks quite a bit of freedom, like your forced to go through a linear series of events to through the temples, like for the water temple I got there before being told to and did all the puzzles but couldn't use the water wheels, which is really gay.
>now
He's the real namegay, and by far the worst one, in nearly every one of these threads, but you don't hear about him as much because he's on the tendie side instead of criticizing it.
the zonai device gacha doesn't get shit on enough >need to stock up on a specific device >have to go to a specific gacha machine to get it >shove every zonai charge you have into it >get none of what you want and a bunch of shit you're never gonna use
they could have done what they did with the bargainer statues, where every time you find a new location more items are added to the shop
>need to stock up on a specific device >spend 5 small zonai charges, don't get what I want >spend 5 large zonai charges, get more of what I want than I'll ever need
Plaer IQ issue
I hated breath of the wild and I like tears of the kingdom. Hell, I'd even call it an overall 8.5 or even 9 out of 10.
Of course if you loved botw I can definitely see totk not being enough of a change to satisfy you, but because I didn't play botw beyond the bare minimum it's easy for me to take totk as mostly its own thing.
I like the meal requests from Malanya, but frick some of these recipe distinctions. Why do we have cream of vegetable soup and creamy vegetable soup as two distinct recipes?
Nintendo basically fricked themselves with this game because they made a feature creep sequel that's essentially unfollowable like Smash Ultimate.
The fuse mechanics clearly ate up a huge chunk of development and now kids who started with BotW and TotK is gonna expect this to be the standard for Zelda moving forward. Reusing the same map for a third time would also be inexusable so to make a Zelda that reaches the standard theyve set is gonna take like 10 years now. That or they have to do a total clean slate reboot ala RE6 > RE7 which is gonna piss a lot of people off.
>Standard
Nintendo doesn't give a frick about standards and what they did before. Better that kids realize this early. Plenty of people were disappointed with Zelda 2 after having played Zelda 1, it's a right of passage for kids to get to experience this. It happened for the OoT crowd. They got MM right after it, had tons of fun with that one too and then had to suffer through the Wind Waker. >It's not MY Zelda
is a once in a generation call and it's overdue for the zoomers
fine i'll take the bait. here's what i think of it so far (90 hours in) >LOVED
the first few hours. after not having played BOTW in 5+ years, it was fun starting from square one. new abilities to unlock, no hearts, no stamina, no fricking glider again. i jumped to my death almost instantly because i tried to just glide across a gap. and then for the next few hours i kept fricking trying to fly and just fell to my death multiple times. hilarious. >LIKED
once you're into the main quests and you get free range. you can collect the tears or do the temples, or just run around and try to get powered up from shrines and koroks. lots of directions to go, more than BOTW offered which was pretty open already >MEH
the story. don't care for it. zelda is cute i guess, sonia too. i just don't really give a shit about any of it. apparently the master sword is locked behind finding all the memories so i'll have to do it at some point, but currently i'm just trying to statsmax and fill out the entire map before getting the sword and taking on ganon >HATED
the overall performace of the switch. the game looks like shit, it feels really fricking outdated. the loading screen when you ascend. holy shit the loading screen is so jarring, i can't believe nintendo's standards have reached this point. nintendo used to HATE loading screens now this fricking game has to stop and gather it's thoughts when you use ascend in a fricking preloaded room. you're in a shrine, there's literally nothing except me and a couple of balls to move around, it STILL has to load? you can see the fricking top of the platform before i try to ascend
thanks for reading my blogpost please make sure to like and subscribe, we've got new merch coming out soon and my onlyfans is dropping today in honor of juneteenth. we found the last surviving slave in texas and he's going to frick me in the ass while i watch zelda cutscenes
I don't think ascent is a loading screen, I think it's a camera trick. At the speed Link is moving up you'd probably have the camera bopping in and out really fast to avoid clipping into a surface, easier to just make Link the only visible object.
it's a "camera trick" in the sense that you feel like you're still playing the game. i think it stops the world and reloads all the stuff from the top, that's why you can look around at everything before popping out. sometimes it takes far longer to ascend. sometimes (rarely) you just pop through and it doesn't show the screen.
we'll need boundary break or something to do an episode on TOTK and see what's happening while you ascend
>sometimes (rarely) you just pop through and it doesn't show the screen
That only happens when there's nothing between link and the camera, so if you're right at the front edge of something. Like you say you get the transition screen even in shrines where everything's loaded, it's just hiding camera frustrum clipping and making the ability actually feel like something more than the basically instant collision test it is under the hood.
well i haven't fought him yet, but phantom ganon went down like a b***h the first time i actually stood my ground against the gloom. i imagine the boss fight will be like that. i was completely over prepared for the final boss in BOTW so i'll probably be doing that again. i don't mind the final boss being a pushover if i autistically completed every shrine beforehand, i put my time in i should get rewarded for it
It’s not so much his boss fight as it is his backstory in this game. He comes off as a bad anime tier villain this time around, and his entire motivations are lacking anything substantial
>the overall performance of the switch
Seriously this. Nintendo needs to just announce their next gem console at this point. I really do not know what they’re wanting for
>the loading screen when you ascend. holy shit the loading screen is so jarring
What when it goes green?
That's not a loading screen or there would be some kind of consistency in length and it would happen all the time.
It's just so you don't get visuals like this since you're just noclipping straight up.
Burnt out after ~40 hours. Reusing the map was such a mistake considering the sense of discovery is the only good part of the game. The depths were tedious and unfun to explore, and the sky islands were just like ten floating shrines. Ultrahand is alright, but they never give you a real interesting reason to use it. It's always just like a high ledge you have to get up or a chasm to cross, so you're always making some variation of the same build. They also stupidly decide to restrict resources for batteries and zonai devices pretty heavily, so you are actively discouraged from experimentation. Game is a 7/10 at best
Other abilities are fine but I don't like this one. Is it not possible to fuse weapons in the menu like arrows? I hate having to drop the item, select fuse ability, select weapon, and then fuse.
I loved the skill, but you are right, they should have done something cut down the menuing, like being able to fuse the same arrows without having to pause for each and every single one, in fact, they should have done what MGS V did with their very similar in game item selection/ weapon selection menu, and allowed you to only be able to select a few items and not YOUR ENTIRE INVENTORY, also maybe an option to not pause gameplay while switching
Should I be selling all the diamonds and opals and topazes and ambers and shit I pick up? They seem worth a lot of money but apparently they are used in elixirs which I never touch but suspect may be gamebreaking somehow.
I hadn't heard of them being used in elixirs but there is one NPC who'll buy them in chunks of 10 for a better price than you can sell them individually.
you need them for side quests and stuff, it's just better to hold on to them. sell one off here or there but it's better to sit on the gems until somebody asks for a bunch of gems and you can just hand them over on the spot. when you realize you sold them all and actually have to mine you will want to have a nice day. ambers are abundant you can just sell those who cares
I hadn't heard of them being used in elixirs but there is one NPC who'll buy them in chunks of 10 for a better price than you can sell them individually.
Got it I'll save for sidequests and better vendors. Thanks Anons.
do I HAVE to go into the depths to farm Black person rocks to raise my battery and roll the stupid gacha machines for parts?
I've been ignoring it forever because that place sucks and that sounds terrible and boring but I can't fricking make anything even though I rushed to get autobuild and ruined the quest for myself because it made me really uncomfortable not having all of my core abilities
I hate the shrines. I want real dungeons and mini dungeons to return
I got so hyped for the wells thinking one of them would be a mini dungeon like in oot
>dungeons
never gonna happen old man. zelda dungeon maker might be a thing someday, but there will never be a solid 3D zelda dungeon again. >wells
that is pretty disappointing. although i haven't jumped in every single well yet so maybe there's a bigger one with a boss at the end. one with a trading quest like MM? probably not
>zelda dungeon maker might be a thing someday
No thanks, dungeons aren't like Mario levels where you consume them like chips, there's usually the pre dungeon and post dungeon content, all pre dungeon content would be like deku palace before Woodfall, or the ice palace before the water temple. Post dungeon content would be exploring how the area changed after the dungeon is completed. You can't just have dungeons in a vacuum that exist for literally no reason
>I got so hyped for the wells thinking one of them would be a mini dungeon like in oot
You only have yourself to blame N64 babby. And yes, shrines are shit and I hope they never come back.
>You only have yourself to blame N64 babby
What do you mean? Do you mean to say I should not have expected some meaty dungeons in a Zelda game that took more development time than every other Zelda game ever released? Yeah I guess that was dumb, to expect to have the things the game series is actually known for tbh I'll probably skip BoTW 3 if they don't straight up show dungeons before release, frick this
>Spam
Calling people trannies for 100 posts is fine though?
>deliberately instigating fights
So why is it okay to call people snoys at the drop of a hat?
>never once actually seriously considering anyone else to be sentient
Most people outside of Ganker are glorified NPCs. How is this wrong?
> recycling arguments that have been disproven hundreds of times over
And yet, when prompted, nobody can bring up these refutations.
>generally failing to understand the idea that different from him does not mean wrong
Something that's never been done on Ganker before, right?
>abhorrent debate tactics like transmission of guilt
If someone is spamming a thread and calling everyone trannies, shouldn't you at least say something like "that guy doesn't speak for me"? A simple sentence is too much to type, I guess.
>the belief that all of reality revolves around him and anything that offends him was meant as an insult directly to him,
And what's the alternative? Just being a cuck who never asks for anything?
>holding insane hardline beliefs that in no way correlate to reality,
Oh yeah, such as "i wish games ran at 60 FPS" and "i wish this game had a little less story". Defcon 1 right there!
>projecting his childish reasons for playing games onto everyone
HAVING FUN? WTF THAT'S CHILDISH, GROW UP!
Less sales than RDR2
Lower Metacritic than RDR2
Witcher 3 also mogs it btw (more sales than ToTK and BoTW combined, more awards combined too)
Ooh, Erictroony is still SEETHING at having been found out 😉
>Which is giving it attention.
And yet calling the poster based and supporting it is fine? Because that's what you're doing right now.
>>#7377294 posts troony nonsense >>#7736483 I do not approve of #7377294
Yes, that's exactly what I want to see. You don't have to announce your report, but show that you care.
>b-but that's just giving him what he wants
And replying to him, saying that he's based is even worse. And yet you have no problem doing that.
Jesus christ I've been away from the computer for a long while and come back to see this idiot is still spamming this thread while claiming everybody else but him is obsessed and delusional. You're not getting any more (you)s from me homosexual, but its hilarious that you haven't mentioned a single game that does the things this game does better, you're just here stirring the shit pot thinking its bothering people when we're all just in awe at you
>find the FINRA woods excavation site >Looks cool as frick as I go down into it >It's literally a single room with a puzzle solved in 2 seconds with a large zonai charge as the reward
Come on man, give me fricking SOMETHING
I give it a 7 or 8/10, and that's being very generous. Liked it more than BotW, but I had more expectations with this and was hopeful that they'd learn from their mistakes and listen to what fans wanted out of a new open world Zelda (mainly better dungeons), and they did frick all with it.
Nintendo has this weird habit of sticking with shit that fans don't like and doubling or tripling down on it.
I liked BOTW more tbh, this game feels way oversaturated, the story makes absolutely 0 sense (hell, people are wondering if it even connects to BOTW on the timeline). The calm and quiet feel of BOTW with a relatively natural open world and still things to do was done perfectly. In TOTK, it feels like at every half meter there is a puzzle, chest, or encounter. It has nice gameplay but BOTW was a much better game from my perspective.
Shit thread tbh >Totk is perfect in every way >No it's not >Omg acgay is here everyone
Literally read what the frick you're even saying you homosexuals
some PS5 exclusive games but not much really, the thing is my pc already satisfies me and i also have one ps4, would like to play some nintendo exclusivve shit but ps5 will prob have a longer lifespam?
I'd say wait for next year and see if Nintendo says anything a new console, while I've enjoyed my fisher price tablet this shit is already past its lifespan and its about time Nintendo throws a bigger bone to the devs. Try emulating Zelda if its one of the main games you want to try out.
>doesn't understand sarcasm
No wonder you guys hate kaizo games so much.
Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
>Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
98% of your criticisms are bad. I agree with the one about the sage cutscenes repeating over and over again but that's it.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>how much of a dumpster fire it is, because they won't even acknowledge the troony poster
You are doing more damage to the thread than the troony poster. >Every time I discuss the problems with the story
No amount of discussion warrants a complete break from reality.
[...] >Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
maybe 95%, yes. And the 5% are a coincidence.
what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games? And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
>W-WELL THAT'S NOT ENOUGH TO CALL THE GAME SHIT!
It's a good thing I don't do that.
11 months ago
Anonymous
all troony-tier and moronic
11 months ago
Anonymous
What about them? Most of those have been rebutted in every thread you bring them up in.
Point stands. Critics aren't bad, but you're a bad critic.
11 months ago
Anonymous
You've made many critiques of many games over the years, and BOTW is one of the few you've gotten mostly right.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Erictroony, stop sucking off your fellow snoys
11 months ago
Anonymous
What about them? Most of those have been rebutted in every thread you bring them up in.
Point stands. Critics aren't bad, but you're a bad critic.
all troony-tier and moronic
>you don't argue in good faith >yes I do >SHUT UP troony DILATE AND have a nice day
11 months ago
Anonymous
>SHUT UP troony DILATE AND have a nice day
absolutely something you should do.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Why are you quoting my post
What about them? Most of those have been rebutted in every thread you bring them up in.
Point stands. Critics aren't bad, but you're a bad critic.
when I didn't even call you a troony?
Oh right, because you don't have an argument.
11 months ago
Anonymous
You've never once given a rebuttal to a single one of my criticisms. >b-but people do it all the time
And yet a single link, even one link, is too much to ask for.
>what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games?
Bad faith argument >And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Enemy AI is already different between their colors so Gold does indeed change the AI. >Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
Odyssey is a Sandbox game. That said I've noticed improvements of the frame rate on places that previously chugged in BOTW like the Korok Forest. >What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
Why is this a bad thing? Even the tutorial can be tackled by the order you want. >What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
You can in fact not take out items for build parts during most dungeons.
>bad faith argument
wtf does this mean?
>Enemy AI is already different between their colors so Gold does indeed change the AI.
And yet they all die the same. There's no difference between a regular archer and a silver gold ultra rainbow archer. You walk up to one, and they'll just look at you confused for a few hours, until it clicks that they should probably attack you. Real genius AI.
>Odyssey is a Sandbox game. That said I've noticed improvements of the frame rate on places that previously chugged in BOTW like the Korok Forest.
Wait a sec, I thought the game never chugged even once. Wasn't that "snoy troony propaganda"? good to know that your argument isn't even consistent anymore.
>Why is this a bad thing?
Because I want to skip the tutorial? If it's apparently so good that I have to experience it, then why not make the whole game mandatory? If the content is so amazing, then why let the player skip it at all?
>You can in fact not take out items for build parts during most dungeons.
And yet rocket shields should be immune because....?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>You've never once given a rebuttal to a single one of my criticisms.
I and several other anons have in other threads. But it doesn't matter. >And yet a single link, even one link, is too much to ask for.
It happens so frequently that yes, even one link is way too much to ask for. Every time you lose an argument you start sperging out and making up strawmen, it's the biggest telltale sign that you have nothing more to contribute to the discussion. You're a bad faith shitposter and you've lost yet again. Case dismissed.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>I and several other anons have in other threads. But it doesn't matter.
No proof = didn't happen.
>It happens so frequently that yes, even one link is way too much to ask for
I think you got that backwards anon. If it happened so frequently, it would be borderline trivial to link to an example.
>you're a bad faith shitposter
Says the man who spammed "troony" 50 times in this thread alone.
11 months ago
Anonymous
The proof is in the pudding, but I know you're too peabrained to understand this analogy. >If it happened so frequently, it would be borderline trivial to link to an example.
Exactly. >Says the man who spammed "troony" 50 times in this thread alone.
Wasn't me but thanks for confirming you're a bad faith shitposter.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>wtf does this mean?
It's a bad faith argument because the Zelda series was not designed to be full tryhard mode, game is also easily the hardest one out of virtue of it's design, as you can run into enemies that can one-shot you a lot >B-but 1/4th heart
Try saying that to the Gleeoks
>And yet they all die the same >They die if they are killed
Incredible argument truly
>I thought the game never chugged even once.
Nobody has said that. It very clearly is too ambitious for the Switch hardware, we all know this, we all stated this before. It's a miracle that the instances where it does chug are very minimal.
>Because I want to skip the tutorial? If it's apparently so good that I have to experience it, then why not make the whole game mandatory?
That's a stupid argument. The tutorial exists to familiarize you with the kind of tools and puzzles for which you'll use them throughout the game, as well as give you story context to your new powers. >And yet rocket shields should be immune because....?
They aren't, if you already have one fused the game can't do much about you using it, but it will not let you fuse them inside a dungeon where they don't want you to.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>It's a bad faith argument because the Zelda series was not designed to be full tryhard mode,
BOTW and TOTK are not supposed to be like the rest of the series. Appeal to tradition literally does not work for a game that's trying to veer far away from a majority of the series.
>Try saying that to the Gleeoks
See webm.
>Incredible argument truly
Not sure why an archer magically goes braindead if you get too close. You'd think they'd be a little snappier about trying to kill a guy, but Nintendo probably forgot. Small indie company pls understand.
>Nobody has said that. I
You've been calling me a snoy for years for complaining about the framerate, citing that it's perfect and never once drops. Don't you dare.
>The tutorial exists to familiarize you with the kind of tools and puzzles for which you'll use them throughout the game,
Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
> as well as give you story context
Wtf is this movieshit? I shouldn't need "story context" for anything, you're not making an Avengers film.
>They aren't, if you already have one fused the game can't do much about you using it,
Funny, it's not like there was an area of BOTW that prevented you from cheesing it by refusing to let you bring in OP weapons. Haha.
The proof is in the pudding, but I know you're too peabrained to understand this analogy. >If it happened so frequently, it would be borderline trivial to link to an example.
Exactly. >Says the man who spammed "troony" 50 times in this thread alone.
Wasn't me but thanks for confirming you're a bad faith shitposter.
>The proof is in the pudding,
Where's the pudding? it's certainly not here.
11 months ago
Anonymous
The pudding is right there in your post. You're already screeching and committing a dozen different logical fallacies right off the bat because you lost to yet another anon.
It's in other threads too but I'm glad you agree that it would be trivial to link to them and thus pointless.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>saying that a game is 6/10 is "screeching"
Feel free to link more metacritic and sales articles, since that's the only argument you ever have in these threads.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Concession accepted. Maybe next time, ACgay.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>i-i'm the one that won, not you!
I'm not the one throwing insults around.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>trying to get the last word in now that the thread is about to die because it's all he has left
Concession accepted, cope harder.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
No it wouldn't. Throwing the players into a gigantic world with as many complex mechanics and systems WITHOUT even fricking explaining it, explaining what the controls are, and explaining the expectations placed on the player, would be an absolute fricking mess that no developer would even consider.
Once ACgay, you continue to expose yourself as a clown shoes moron who understands NOTHING about video games. You can only fester on this shithole board because your laughable opinions would be publicly mocked and humiliated anywhere else.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>No it wouldn't.
Terraria says otherwise, and it's a far more complex and fun game than both BOTW and TOTK combined. It's also not movieshit, which helps.
>trying to get the last word in now that the thread is about to die because it's all he has left
Concession accepted, cope harder.
If you want the last word, go right head. Go on, I'll even duck out so you can get it in. My treat. 🙂
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Terraria says otherwise, and it's a far more complex and fun game than both BOTW and TOTK combined. It's also not movieshit, which helps.
why do you worship troony movie games like troonyraria?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Terraria is 80% filler in between occasionally fun bosses. Not even close.
11 months ago
Anonymous
BotW and TotK are considered amongst the best designed video games of all time.
Terraria never will be.
Funny that.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Even the devs disagree with you.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Terraria says otherwise,
No it doesn't. Terraria is a textbook example of a wiki game. Fricking impossible to play that shit without a guide open at all times. A tutorial would have helped.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>See webm.
Shows boss with only a 3rd of its energy left.
Player using high-powered weapons he would have had to struggled to gain.
Yeah great argument you moronic shitter.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>BOTW and TOTK are not supposed to be like the rest of the series.
What the frick are you talking about? You can steer away from the formula while staying faithful to the series. BOTW and TOTK did just that. >Hurr see webm
moron no shit that preparation makes it easier to handle that's the whole point. >Not sure why an archer magically goes braindead if you get too close.
The archers can shoot you while in the stairs now and won't allow you to kneel down to avoid their hits. Also most archers this time also have items for electricity, ice and fire so they can one-shot you. >You've been calling me a snoy for years for complaining about the framerate, citing that it's perfect and never once drops.
It's because you make a big deal out of something that lasts literally seconds and doesn't come off as a detriment to gameplay ever you drama queer. >Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
Games get more complex over time it's only natural not to want to overwhelm it's player but clearly you know nothing of game design. >Muh movieshit >Muh avengers
Marvel rotted your brain. >Funny, it's not like there was an area of BOTW that prevented you from cheesing it by refusing to let you bring in OP weapons.
You mean tides? Those still exist in TOTK. Of course you'd knew that had you played the game.
Caught you ACgay.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games?
Bad faith argument >And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Enemy AI is already different between their colors so Gold does indeed change the AI. >Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
Odyssey is a Sandbox game. That said I've noticed improvements of the frame rate on places that previously chugged in BOTW like the Korok Forest. >What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
Why is this a bad thing? Even the tutorial can be tackled by the order you want. >What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
You can in fact not take out items for build parts during most dungeons.
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
When has this not been the case?
11 months ago
Anonymous
see
[...]
what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games? And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
>W-WELL THAT'S NOT ENOUGH TO CALL THE GAME SHIT!
It's a good thing I don't do that.
not really. i loved the game, you can be the winning different greater gigacheddar and i will be the crying basedjack having fun with games i enjoy playing
I hate how gluing alignment has a tiny bit of RNG. I thought it was sorta grid-based, but it can also be off a few centimeters even when it looks like you glued to the same spot. It pisses me off when I try to use fans and it's just SLIGHTLY misaligned.
I hated ocarina of time. I hated twilight princess. I hated the story of tears of the kingdom. I hated the characters of tears of the kingdom. I hated the graphics of tears of the kingdom. But frick did I have fun with this game.
I wanted to hate tears of the kingdom but I can't, it's better than the sum of it parts.
>it's better than the sum of it parts.
The absolute shittiest take I've ever heard. If anything, it's less than the sum of its parts; a bunch of interesting and clever game mechanics all strung together to make a miserable, tedious, repetitive slog through a map we've already explored.
Just admit you're a fricking midwit who enjoys being kept busy with pointless chores, because that's what this whole game is.
>"ADMIT YOU AGREE WITH ME, PLEASE! HATING THIS GAME IS ALL I HAVE!!!"
monkey iq take right there, gentlemen
most moronic post ITT
wow thats cool. you’re not going to believe this, but did you know that ubisoft has been shitting out a dozen terrible games just like TotK every year? you should probably check those out!
sounds like you love trannies
Not one of them reach the heights Botw, Elden Ring and Totk do. I'm happy they satisfy you though
I did, all were worse.
just say that you're a joyless homosexual that enjoys nothing, why even play totk when you "hated" so many of the other games? you're clearly a moron
>I hated the graphics of tears of the kingdom
Looks fine on PC.
gayest post of 2023
Building and fusing sucks. Walking from point A to B is a chore, there is always a convoluted questline to unlock the most basic stuff.
Open World destroyed Zelda because it means there's no forward momentum anymore. By the end it feels like you accomplished nothing and just fricked around in a sandbox. Im glad FFXVI is going with Open Zone for this reason
then do the main quest you homosexual
>FFXVI cultist
Thank god your game is going to sell like shit
10 million demo downloads, cope some more homosexual
and ToTK sold 10 million copies in 3 days, you’ll never reach that in a month lmao
>outing yourself in your own Zelda hate thread
I cant believe people are excited for a Square Enix game in 2023 after a decade of trash
I am a big fan of this game, but I haven't played it yet
I loved it because it did everything better than BOTW. Except one thing : sages powers. What were they thinking ?
in BOTW
>permanenet buff where you just have to hold a button
in TOTK
>go through menu to activate
>go to the sage to talk to him
>activate it accidentaly while trying to take an item
>wait for cooldown
>talk to the sage again when its not in your way or God knows where the frick its stuck into
>activate power
>desactivate on menu
>never call any of those fricker except the bird
What the absolute frick happened ?
I thought they were great. Each new sage power was a game changer. Having the goron smash rocks and ore for me saved me a ton of weapons and bomb arrows. But I wouldn't keep them out all the time.
My go-to is a cannon spear. It doesn't work on uneven ground, but it's the absolute best option otherwise imo
>I loved it because it did everything better than BOTW.
I thought botw was already perfect
It was. You are correct.
You're a fricking idiot. I know this is bait but botw set a gold standard in open world, and Elden Ring and ToTK are the only games that have surpassed it. No game is perfect, any real fan of any game will be the first to list its flaws. You're having an argument with yourself
TotK's puzzles and dungeons are wirse than BotWs. Also since TotK reuses BotW's map there isn't any sense of exploration.
>gays
>haven't played either
>proceed to be gays and give an unfounded opinion
>TotK reuses BotW's map there isn't any sense of exploration.
It uses the basic layout but everything in the game is different. Even older locations can have new things to find which adds to the sense of exploration because you don't only want to find new areas but also what's different with the old ones.
>new things to find
Shrines and koroks and goblin camps are not new.
Then stop playing botw and start playing totk.
>Also since TotK reuses BotW's map there isn't any sense of exploration
for this to be true, you must be the most autistic person in the world remembering every single geographic layout to the point where it bothers you
or
you haven't played the game
They should have just put the Sage powers in a menu on d-pad down. They could still make them summons, they could still follow you around, but activating the powers should be on the d-pad.
>sage powers
yeah this needed to be reworked for sure.
>be underground
>grab some poes in the darkness, try to avoid enemies
>accidentally trigger everybody's powers
>goron frickin flies off into the distance alerting everything to my presence
>now i have to waste a sword on some low tier shit
pretty gay. here's another one
>drop in on a pack of moose
>shoot them all in the head
>run around spamming A
>trigger the rito homie
>he fricking blasts the meat with his wind
>it flies over the cliff and starts floating downstream
t-thanks bro
>blasts the meat with his wind
Blow job
i keep all 5 out all the time, and i dont really run into any problems. sometimes in cave or lumpy areas and i want a specific one like yunobo, but the weird terrain makes them randomly disappear, but really i have zero issues. the "accidentally activate them while picking stuff up" is 100% a skill issue. bad reaction times, bad spacial awareness, and also the clear choice to run in circles back towards the sages. the only one i ever bother to put away is yunobo, and thats ONLY if im doing extended vehicle travel, because for some reason him sitting on the front has actual weight/physics and can cause you to veer. its really not a problem.
I think the sages would've been much better to use if all of them had a contextual trigger like spamming A while gliding to trigger Tulin.
Or they could've added a separate radial that's triggered with the D-pad mineru gays need not apply
Still currently playing. Its amazing. I'm sure this shithole of rabid fartsniffers is trying hard to shit on le acclaimed and popular game.
You're just a contrarian jaded piece of shit who is upset they can't enjoy what everyone else is still enjoying. Game over.
>contrarian
Tourists leave 🙂
All trannies disliking Zelda are tourists from reddit, troony-kun 😉
It's at best a 6/10. My 70 dollars were not wasted still because its filled with 7 times the 10 dollars mediocre shit
These threads would be better with an interesting OP image and not the box art with generic statements.
TOTK is GOTY 2023. seethe more
Watch Starfield do to it what Skyrim did to Skyward Sword
As much as Ganker likes to whine about Zelda, is anyone unironically hyped for a space game already done better by developers who aren’t fricking Bethesda? They should’ve just made Elder Scrolls VI
I'm mildly excited on their take on this, jokes aside. Post BotW I've not been hyped on Zelda, which happened to be my favorite franchise
Starfield is for mainstream shitheads, real rpg chads will be enjoying BG3.
Hell no, it's going to be janky as frick and flop. I'm guessing it'll be a slightly better polished turd than mass effect andromeda, but play similarly poorly.
The 5 remaining X-Drones think its the holy grail.
Starfield will be Fallout 4.5.
ToTk was BotW 1.1
>ToTk was BotW 1.1
imagine where every game's +0.1 update was as tight, different and content packed as Totk. You can't because you clearly haven't played the game. Name me one example of a sequel reusing a map where so much care has been taken to remix and freshen up everything
Far cry primal
>Name me one example of a sequel reusing a map where so much care has been taken to remix and freshen up everything
Any sequel that reuses a map is a +0.1 at best.
Kek it looks like it's going to be as big a flop as cyberpunk. Also all the snoy homosexuals are boycotting because bethesda's ignoring them. Hilarious.
Skyward sword was actually bad though. TOTK is a good game made to look worse by anti-open world pants shitters
>literally no man's sky 2
This. Guaraneted. All teh other games coming out look like gay trash.
Yup.
Why do you worship trannies?
Zelda is forever shit now due to this gmod sandbox bullshit. Even Nintendo themselves seem to constantly be working around it because they need to throw a brunch of shitty limitations on the player to make it an actual game.
Incredible game, easy GOTY, nothing else comes close.
I like it.
I enjoyed my 100~ hours with the game
I love it. I am like 100+ hours in and completed the 4 temples and feel like there is so much still to do.
Also upgraded the armors I really wanted and my batteries so got that grind mostly behind me.
It's fun.
>It's ok to admit that you didn't love the game now
But I do love it. You need to be a miserable jaded c**t to play TotK and not enjoy it. Whats the fricking alternative?
I've barely even played the game
how do I make myself play it anons? I just have no motivation
I would rather browse Ganker or scream at street fighter 6 than hunt for koroks and shrines in the same map I did it for hundreds of hours already years ago
literally every thing at every location has been changed as well as all the quests, if you don't like koroks you simply stop doing them
wow there's random rocks there now what a change
I don't want to talk to NPCs, how the frick is that fun
>the game changed
>well I hate it and don't want to play it
Dood, what a criticism
Ganker and reddit hate this shit game
Blackouts over go back
it's good but something about it feels really lackluster compared to BOTW
>it's good but something about it feels really lackluster compared to BOTW
Because whats there is good, but not "6 years wait, 70 dollars, reused map and assets" good. If TotK came out in 2019 and cost 60 dollars I think almost everyone would have been cool with it. For as cool as the fuse mechanic its ultimately a mistake if it ate up this much dev time.
It's the longest or second longest production cycle of a zelda game in the entire franchise's history but reuses the engine, 75% of the story, and the basemap of the prior game. And that would be fine, if on top of that there was an ungodly amount of shit to do in this rearranged world. There isn't. I'd even go so far as to say there's less to do in it versus BotW. There's no excuse. This was a $30 DLC they want 110% full price plus tip for. Absolute homosexualry.
Erictroony, why are you lying?
huge open world were a mistake
people wanted oot but less linear instead we get this 200 hour long nothing fest
Wind Waker was unironically the perfect evolution of the formula but it got rejected due to the toon graphics and limitations of the gamecube.
>perfect evolution
>ending is a boring ass fetchquest
Yeah, kys
The cel shading was great, the game was not. Babby's first Zelda.
No, WW is unironically what morons accused BotW of being. Almost completely empty map with tiny places of interest dotted around, many of which actually copypasted. You could level a similar complaint towards the Sky Islands of ToTk, except those are a small part of the game and they interact often with the land.
Don't you try to have these threads every day? Maybe today is the day your begging of the question will be received well.
>The honeymoon is offically over. It's ok to admit that you didn't love the game now.
Ok. I loved the game though.
I've been saying that about Breath of the Wild since it came out, and I've been saying that about Tears of the Kingdom when it leaked. I don't like it. But apparently you're not allowed to dislike a Nintendo game on Ganker.
Of course you can dislike it. Its the fact that everyone else loves it which upsets you.
I don't care if people like it. It's not my money that paid for the copies they bought. Seems to me like you're just offended that I found a Zelda game to be underwhelming.
Nah, you're mad cause you feel the need to be validated by strangers online, which you are, but it's not the strangers you want to be validated by
>Nah, you're mad cause you feel the need to be validated by strangers online, which you are, but it's not the strangers you want to be validated by
>Seems to me like you're just offended that I found a Zelda game to be underwhelming
>Seems to me like you're just offended that I found a Zelda game to be underwhelming
Ok buddy, nobody is offended, maybe a little concerned
Nah, you're just a jaded gay who hates seeing everyone else like something you do not
>I don't like it.
And you're allowed to, the problem is that people like you have been ranting about botw and now TotK for SIX YEARS.
Think about that, for SIX YEARS you've been obsessing over the game more than any fan ever has.
>2017: BotW releases.
>"I don't like it".
>"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
>2018: BotW DLC expansion pack releases
>"I'm not getting it because I didn't like the game."
>"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
>2019: BotW gets a sequel announced
>"If they make it like BotW without fixing the issues I had with that game, then I won't get it."
>"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
>2020-2023: Tons of threads speculating over limited info released about BotW sequel
>"It doesn't look THAT different from BotW. I didn't like BotW so I'm not sure if I'll get the sequel."
>"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
>2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases
>"It's just BotW all over again. I didn't like BotW so I'm not getting TotK."
>"YOU'RE OBSESSED!"
Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game and are just projecting your obsession.
Here's to another 6 more years of this homosexual's seethe!
>"W-WE'RE NOT SEETHING, YOU ARE!"
We are literally loving a game despite your disapproval. Nobody in this thread is that bothered by you, nobody that loves the game has felt like they need to attack you, this is literally all in your head, but well done on collection those (you)s, I bet this must be a very special day for you
because you're seething morons that can spend your time in any way but choose to b***h about something you dislike. I am obsessed with this game and that's fine cause I enjoy it. Haters on the other hand... can't understand their mania.
Its good that you're avoiding everybody that is telling you that its ok to not like games. I mean you're still here posting in a thread about a game you don't like. And you've been doing it for years. Grow some self awareness anon
Also no matter how salty you are most of us have loved this game, get over it
>Lists games and years
>This keeps happening
>it must be the same 3 Zelda fans that have it in for me >:'(
Well done fellow moron
>it must be the same 3 Zelda fans that have it in for me >:'(
Excuse me, what?
They literally think Ganker is the same person. That dude 6 years ago who didn't like botw is the same guy who's saying they don't like totk in their mind, because TWO people couldn't possibly dislike their game.
The reason why people call you obsessed is because you seemingly can’t shut up about not liking BotW.
Well apparently Tendies can't shut up about BotW or TotK, so if you guys are gonna bring it up, then I'm just gonna respond by saying that I didn't like it.
Erictroony, why are you such a subhuman?
And now we've reached the point where tendies bring up their bogeyman again...
Allow me to fix this
>>2017: BotW releases.
>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>>okay, who cares.
>>late 2017: BotW DLC expansion pack releases
>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>>okay, who cares.
>2018: no dlc no sequel everyone has moved on to other games
>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>crickets, especially once smash comes out.
>>2019: BotW gets a sequel announced
>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>>we haven't seen anything yet
>>2020-mid 2022: very few threads talking about the new game because of the limited information
>>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>>why are you still making shitposting threads? We don't have anything to talk about.
>>2023: Tears of the Kingdom finally releases
>>>>I DON'T LIKE IT AND IT SUCKS
>>you're obsessed you've been at this for six years, get over it
>Seems to me like you guys are the ones obsessed over the fact that we didn't like the game
You see, it doesn't work both ways.
You're obsessed because you hate this game but can't bring yourself to leave it and fans be. I mean, I don't care for bad games like tlou and Terraria but I don't go into every thread about them and screech like an autist looking for validation of my opinion on it for six years. I just let people do what they want to do because I'm a normal person.
>posts a massive wall of text responding to a guy who doesn't like a Zelda game
>"You're obsessed"
>"I'm a normal person."
It's literally less added text than you originally posted, moron
You sure about that? Let's find out...
https://wordcounter.net/character-count
>Characters 808 Words 139 Lines 17
>Characters 1284 Words 241 Lines 26
What now, homosexual?
Why are trannies objectively moronic.
>added
Thanks for proving me right, Erictroony.
>Why are trannies objectively moronic.
Why don't you tell us based on your experience as one?
The frick did I do? All I did was ask a question you fricking loser. At least im contrubuting to the thread and not seething over moronic trannies like yourself. Do me a favor and have a nice day on your ceiling fan and turn it on before you die, homosexual.
>What now, homosexual?
What do you mean "what now?"
Anon, you went through the trouble of counting the words because you're obsessed.
>massive wall of text
Anon, almost all of that was copy and pasted from YOUR post. If you think he's obsessed because of that then you're the one who's obsessed.
Copied but then repackaged with even more text on top of that as I proved here:
Erictroony, why are you so pathetic?
>brings up trannies for no reason
Obsessed.
Erictroony, why are you avoiding the question?
Why are you?
I asked first, Erictroony 😉
And I’m asking you now since you’re the one who has that experience. 😉
>I'm not a troony
>posts e-girlcon
....Eric.....
>90% copied from the original post
>being representative of him and not you
You're talking to a man who unironically praises TLOU and God of War because, in his twisted mind, metacritic cannot be wrong because otherwise his "it's popular, therefore it's good" mantra completely falls apart.
He's a broken man who deserves pity. Watch, he's already posted his sales images like
. Expect him to post smug zelda.png, if he hasn't already.
>metacritic cannot be wrong
Feel free to name all those low-scoring metacritic games you enjoy?
>it's popular, therefore it's good
Critical acclaim has nothing to do with "popularity".
>You're talking to a man who unironically praises TLOU and God of War
You know that's who you're replying to right?
>Outlines seven years of posting in threads about a game he doesn't like
anons calling you obsessed might be on to something
>I've been saying that about Breath of the Wild
>But apparently you're not allowed to dislike a Nintendo game on Ganker
so apparently nobody has stopped you from disliking a nintendo game for years?
Also good for you mate would you like a medal? Won't you stop telling people they're wrong for liking something you don't like until you get validation?
I don't care if you like the game. For some reason you guys care that I dislike the game based on the amount of replies I'm getting to this post.
>For some reason you guys care that I dislike the game based on the amount of replies I'm getting to this post
>For some reason you guys care that I dislike the game based on the amount of replies I'm getting to this post.
Anon, no one cares that you disliked the game. Its the fact that instead of accepting you dislike it you came here to scream that you disliked it.
>Anon, no one cares that you disliked the game. Its the fact that instead of accepting you dislike it you came here to scream that you disliked it.
If you didn't care that I disliked the game then why ddi you bother responding to my post?
NTA but you literally just quoted the answer to that.
>If you didn't care that I disliked the game then why ddi you bother responding to my post?
Well, you caught us there anon. Guys pack it up, lets admit Totk is nothing but a copypaste of botw, and we're all just wildly coping here. Its been a good run, but this butthole finally got the best of us. Sorry that we've been OBSESSED with YOU for the past 6 years when you did nothing but spread the truth, there's a very special somebody that died 2023 years ago that you remind me of
Ericrtroony, why are you so mentally ill?
>Ericrtroony
who is this?
He’s a bogeyman that the tendies invented. Pay it no mind.
ah
so the game has reached the "schizos attacking it and schizos defending it" phase
makes sense
Why are you worshipping trannies, reddit and subhumans?
Not a troony. Now, back on topic, will you consider streaming your suicide for my entertainment?
Why are you so mentally ill, Erictroony?
>That pic
Its hilarious that you posted this unironically when you come to screech in a Zelda thread where everybody is telling you its cool that you don't like the game
It's hilarious tht you're acting like my comment and my pic didn't bother you when it clearly did.
keep at it son, you're winning!
bruh, give it a rest. I know you're fishing for (you)s but this is sad
Hey, you're the ones choosing to engage with me. I'm just responding.
>I'm just responding.
Because you're obsessed.
Holy projection.
>when you do it its engaging
>when I do it its just responding (Look at these Imbeciles ENGAGE XD)
Its FUN? Its why we're all here on 4chin? But most of us in this thread are also having fun from Gankeridya, I'm sorry you're so jaded you need (you)s in your life [/spoiler]I do too[/spoiler]
>But apparently you're not allowed to dislike a Nintendo game on Ganker.
He says, in one out of five threads currently shitting on Totk
Based on the state of how this thread went, I’d say that this anon was proven right.
Nah, you were proven wrong by the OP which was the autistic screeching.
i just rushed the mainstory its a solid 7
It’s mid, but it looks great in YouTube videos. I had to play it. How many copies will it sell?
I absolutely loved it, but there will always be things that falls short on.
>Dungeons, while slightly improved since last time, are still weak.
>With all the focus on sky islands this time around, they're all very small outside of the tutorial island
>The depths, while a cool ideal, are underwhelming
>Memories this time around while easier to find are oddly placed, and if focused on too soon, can ruin the flow of the story (not that there is much, but still)
>Enemy variety still small
>Constant menu navigating an issue. Armors not having a way to sort by favorites since the larger your wardrobe becomes, the bigger the pain it is to find what you need for the specific area
>Arrow fusing can be done in the quick access menu but weapon fusing can't. Would be great if there was a way to pre-fuse arrows
>Sage abilities a pain to work with since they're running around away from your reach and sometimes don't even appear when you need them (Yunobo would sometimes be miles away when I needed him and the whistling seems inconsistent)
>the depths, while a cool idea, are underwhelming
How is an entire inverse map that wasn't revealed prior to release "underwhelming"?
>Enemy variety still small
The addition of Aerocuda, boss bokoblins, Zonai and Flux constructs, the walking trees, Gibdos, Gleeoks, Gloom Hands, Horriblins, and Like Likes aren't enough for you?
>Sage abilities a pain to work with
I mostly agree with that, and the rest of your post, but I also think that they were implemented really well in some cases. Like Tulin always being with you in mid-air and Yunobo always being a fireable cannon on vehicles. There just needs to be a similar utility for Sidon and Riju. I still think that the Sages are far more useful than the Champion abilities though.
>ten new enemies are not enough?
No, moron, it's fricking not.
There was like 19 different enemies in BotW. They add eight more, and people act like it was the greatest improvement ever after six freaking years.
>There was like 19 different enemies in BotW. They add eight more
There were around 27 in botw not counting recolors.
Totk added the around same amount also not counting recolors.
There's 27 different common enemies not counting reskins in totk. Go and count them. And that's including Frox and Gleoks.
>There's 27 different common enemies not counting reskins in totk
Are we counting older enemies too?
Moblin
Bokoblin
Lizalfos
Chuchu
Keese
Lynel
Octorok
Wizrobe
Pebblit
Blademaster
Footsoldier
Gibdo
Moth Gibdo
Boss Bokoblin
Aerocuda
Bubbulfrog
Like like
Horriblin
Captain construct
Soldier construct
Evermean
Gloom spawn
Little Frox
Gleeok
Talus
Phantom Ganon
Hinox
Molduga
Frox
Flux construct
That's 30 not including story bosses.
I feel like I missed one too but whatever.
>ten new enemies
I'm not exhausitively listing everything. Within the constructs there are what, 6 different types? Not to mention all the variants of the other enemies.
>people act like it was the greatest improvement ever
I'm really not. I literally just listed the categories of added enemies and asked if that wasn't enough. I'm sure you're the type of person that would claim even Elden Ring doesn't have enough enemies lol.
No, Elden Ring had plenty.
I love both Elden Ring and Totk
>Within the constructs there are what, 6 different types?
2.
>Not to mention all the variants of the other enemies.
New colors are not new enemies.
>I'm sure you're the type of person that would claim even Elden Ring doesn't have enough enemies lol.
Elden Ring has 150+ fricking unique enemies and dozens of unique bosses, WAY more than enough for a normal game, and yet even elden ring starts to feel a bit samey by the end due its gigantic map. TotK's map is even larger and ten times as homogenous. It's not even a new fricking map. What were they DOING for 6 years? I guess just polishing the shit out of the stupid gimmicky lego physics shit that 99% of players don't even bother with besides hoverbikes and gluing shit into bridges.
>2
I already named two in my post, and there are more. Captain, Flux, Maker, Soldier, and Ranger.
>new colors are not new enemies
And I'm not claiming they are, I'm just pointing out how disingenuous it is to claim that there are a mere 10 new enemies.
>Elden Ring has 150+ fricking unique enemies and dozens of unique bosses
"Unique" meaning what? They are reused all the time across the map and many are present in their earlier titles.
>TotK's map is even larger and ten times more homogenous
I love Elden Ring, but it is clearly more monotonous. In TotK you have dozens of different ways to solve a task, in ER you swing your sword. Two different games with different playstyles aside, this is a moot point.
>It's not even a new fricking map
>what were they DOING for 6 years?
>stupid gimmicky lego physics shit that 99% of players don't even bother with
Your memes won't make your point for you, homosexual.
What do you expect? Most modern games are lucky if they get 10 different enemy types, including bosses, period. This is ER all over again. That game has more enemy variety in the first Zone than most full games and yet people keep b***hing about a lack of enemy variety.
I didn't expect more from nu-nintendo. This is precisely the kind of lazy mediocrity I anticipated. That doesn't make it good. Elden Ring's problem is just that the map is too big. Get rid of the mountaintops and showfield and distribute what unique elements they have into the rest of the game and it would go to from very good to fantastic. TotK requires literal years more development to be worth its time or cost.
>I still think that the Sages are far more useful than the Champion abilities though.
Yeah, I agree with that. The only useful ones were Revali's gale and Urbosa's fury. Mipha's grace being an auto heal was nice but was basically a buffed fairy.
And Daruk's protection just couldn't do anything you couldn't already with a standard block.
I really wish you could alter their behaviour, like select wether you want them to attack or to hold them back. I hate having them frick with my battles
I mean you can turn off their spirits if you want t
yeah I'm aware, I wish there were more options that just on and off
I love how there's always a checklist that gets posted when someone makes a critique of this game. No, that isn't enough like the anon said, especially given that there's two big maps and a pitiful amount of sky to traverse in. If anything, it makes the additions worse because they don't correlate with the areas you can travel. Why am I seeing Construct Fluxes and Taluses underground instead of more unique enemies like the Frox? The sky doesn't even have its own unique boss and the desert is still the best region because of the Molduga and now having gibdos roaming the area. It's like they didn't learn from the first game.
>I love that there's always a checklist
It was posted that way lol
>Why am I seeing Construct Fluxes and Taluses underground instead of more unique enemies like the Frox?
You see all three of those underground, and there's a very clear explanation that the Zonai are an ancient civilization uncovered by the calamity at the beginning of the game, while Talus are literally just rocks so ofc they're gonna be underground
>The sky doesn't even have its own unique boss
The Wind temple and Water temples don't count all of a sudden?
>Desert is still the best region because [harder enemies]
It's pretty clear from the game's design that it is meant to be the last area cleared
>The Wind temple and Water temples don't count all of a sudden?
I didn't know I could find those individual bosses in the sky. You CAN find them underground, which isn't a bad thing, mind you. Try again.
>It's pretty clear from the game's design that it is meant to be the last area cleared
And I did it before the water temple, so that's a moot point and only proves MY point; the desert tries to be unique and remains unique. If only they did that with the other regions.
>the sky has unique bosses
>ackshually a boss must be encountered individually in a vacuum for it to count
Oh frick off with this stupid ass logic. If a boss is in the sky it's a boss that is unique to the sky. If you count the rematches in the Depths that's moronic.
>I did it earlier, therefore the intended path is a moot point
Not really. It's like complaining that the hardest enemies are in Hyrule Castle. A zone having more unique enemies than others doesn't mean that all the other zones are bad.
There are like 4 cool sky islands, then there are the skydiving ones and the other ones are just variations of the same sky crosses with some shrine stone quest.
I just wish they cut the amount of sky islands in half if it meant having larger and more meaningful sky islands that you actually felt like exploring.
Also, skyward towers made it way too easy to get to sky islands. I kinda wish there was more of a feeling of figuring out how to get up there
I wish there were half as much sk
I'll be honest, that one sky island blueprint (the vaguely cross-shaped island with the device trader and the shrine and the rotate-able launcher in the center) felt like the most egregious case of reused content in the game.
Lost cause OP. Switchtards are shit eaters and will defend this lazy repetitive trash forever.
I finished the Wind Temple yesterday and had a blast
I haven't been so hooked on a game since elden ring
The trick is to not get too excited and assume the developers will always frick up the most basic things. Barely anybody talks about how to use the hero skills you need to have them follow you around everywhere. The amount of times link has been like "I've just finished mining all this ore, please rito-sis blow all of this off a cliff for me" is infuriating. But I haven't loved a game the way I love this game for years (well elden ring). I LOVED the first long hours of botw, but after putting in many hours the cracks were too noticeable and I never enjoyed as much as I did initially. I haven't felt that from Totk. I've loved every dungeon. after having completed every dungeon I'm now too busy wanting to frick around to get on with the story, and replaying it doesn't seem as daunting as botw did
I'm a big OoT MM and gameboy fan, and Wind waker is my all time favourite game, I will always yearn for a zelda game with a more intimate smaller scale story and world, I will always hope for the return of that artwork and the best link in the series, and a return of the hookshot. But for a Ubishit game, Totk is a homerun
This game was so a disgrace.
>Lol, vroom vroom, I can drive plywood now
>OMG is that another korok?
>Ya ha ha!
>ANOHTER SRINE?
>SO EXCIITE!
This puke was made for the tik tok generation
So what do I do now? I just found the last memory, have the master sword, and the quest to kill ganon. I've mostly ignored the world, so what's integral now? Finding the best armor pieces?
>"I must complete every task the game tells me to!"
>"What? Have fun? No, that does not compute. Give me another task"
The game handily catalogues the major sidequests as Side Adventures, you could do those. There's 60 of them.
have fun fricking around?
Enjoy the exploration?
I don't think this game is for you anon
Frick you're right.. I grew up..
reads like giving a robot a video game for the first time lmao
It would have been better as a DLC.
It was too massive a change for dlc.
No it isn't. Other games include changes to the map in DLCs.
>Other games include changes to the map in DLCs.
This is false by the way, most games tend to opt for a sub map containing the dlc and it still doesn't bring as many new elements.
the changes they made were greater than changing map topography moron
Map changes are the biggest argument for it not just being a huge DLC.
literally only the topography is unchanged, even completely ignoring the sky/depths:
every single location has been replaced with something new. The quests alone should tell anyone with a brain why this is a new game. "DLC" is nothing but a shitty Ganker meme.
Those could all have been added as DLC.
A new set of quests equal in content to the original game, that's a new game son that's a fact. Your opinion on the matter means nothing nor does the DLC meme no matter how hard you losers scream it. Maybe try pointing out an actual flaw like the dungeons being too easy.
thanks man
Tiktok of the kingdom is heinously uninspired.
It’s mid
>mid
Fr fr no cap?
>love botw over 500 hours on switch and cemu
>pirate totk
>get bored after 10~ hours
I don't get it man it's just fricking boring
I just wish the ending was better. I wanted to see the rebuilding of Hyrule. Instead we just got an Avengers after credits scene like there's going to be a BotW 3 or something. God I hope not, I love these games but I'm done with wastleland Hyrule.
It would have been really nice to carry on playing with updated dialogue and Zelda in the world visiting various locations, like her fixed garden. It kinda sucks that all you can do is peace out and teleport somewhere, especially considering the sages are supposed to be right behind you fighting giant monsters.
You can (should) turn them off
>especially considering the sages are supposed to be right behind you fighting giant monsters.
Ah shit, that really bothers me for some reason.
>We're here! Don't worry hero, we'll handle these beasts, you go save the world!
>Uhhh actually guys I'm just checking my bag here and I gotta go stew some tomatoes, catch you back in town? *zweoooop*
I like it but not as much as BotW back when it came out. And I still struggle to finish TotK because going through the same stuff is annoying. Definitely NOT a GOTY material
The underground completely sucks ass. People shitpost about BOTW’s overworld being empty but they are wrong, there’s always new biomes to see and new quests to do. The underground is what a genuinely empty game world looks like, there is nothing there aside from one quest with Koga. Every area looks the same and full of copypaste. You casually stumble on chests containing lore breaking former amibo shit in the middle of nowhere down there. If it wasn’t for the quickbuild and extra batteries being down there nobody would go there.
Its funny I hated the underground initially but it's really grown on me, its ASMRy, just make your way turning on the lights, fighting high level mobs and getting materials to power up your batteries
>nothing aside from one quest with Koga
I always wonder with posters like this, do you realize that you are revealing you haven't beaten the game?
>lore breaking former amibo shit
lol frick off timelinegay
Bi-Hourly TotK schizo thread.
Tendo cult hates when you criticize the only game coming out this year.
Exploring and upgrading Link over time was fun, but some armor upgrades should be less grindy.
The new temples are a step up from BotW, but aren't as good as older Zelda games.
The underground section feels pointlessly large with too little to do unless you really have a craving for zonai shit and nostalgia armor.
Melee combat still isn't that fun due to how slow Link is, so playing with the bow as if the game was a budget Dragon's Dogma was significantly more fun than actually running up to hit things.
I had fun but I also didn't do everything in the game because a lot of the side content doesn't feel worth doing. Once again, I feel an open world game is too big for its own good and actively detracts from the potential fun of a game. Yes, there's a lot to do, but not all of it is meaningful or particularly exciting and fun.
Also I shot Ganondorf to death with bomb arrows because frick you it's fun.
i love riju dicky
botw was an interesting game cause it changed the zelda formula for the first time in almost 30 years
totk is weird because instead of doing what botw did and drastically changed the formula, it decided to play it safe and just iterate on botw while not adding that much. I just feel more conflicted on totk than I did botw and it's hard to fully describe why
>I just feel more conflicted on totk than I did botw and it's hard to fully describe why
Because BotW was a fresh new spin on Zelda, plus it was more reserved when it came to making changes. With TotK all reservations went straight out the window because BotW was the successful "test game".
BotW was a drastic shift, but it felt like a Zelda sequel. TotK doesnt feel like a Zelda sequel, it feels like a BotW sequel. A very important distinction to make. The Nuts and Bolts shit doesnt make sense for a Zelda sequel, but it does make sense for a BotW sequel. The new standard.
It's the exact same shit that happened with God of War 2018 and Ragnarok. 2018 was the risky new direction so it had a more classic GoW feel to it to not piss fans off. With Ragnarok they had proven the new direction was successful, so they just stopped even pretending this was old GoW anymore and went very hard on the Marvel movie ARPG shit.
Companies got smart and realized you gotta boil the frog slowly basically.
Best Zelda gane ever, not even a contest
>Best Zelda gane ever, not even a coMtest
ftfy
>190 hours played
>80% completion on map (mostly koroks left)
I did and still do love it Black person
>I ate a whole bucket of sand, take that, chud!
>Admit you didn't love this
>I did actually
>KEK XDDD EBIN WIN SNOYS
Nah it's GOTY
Eveything takes so fricking long to do in this game.
>find little bokoromoto seed
>it wants to be with its friend
>start building craft that will take it up the cliff
>half way up
>it snags on the wall and breaks
>out of parts
>frick
>have to go get new ones
>start making my way over there
>realize I’m simultaneously bored and annoyed
>turn the game off
Erictroony, why do you worship subhumans?
Most Zeldas don't live up to the hype
>troony moon
Why do you worship trannies?
You will never score.
Why do you defend trannies?
I'm not defending you
You defended the troony moon.
this sad dumb Black person never watched Nerrel
Why would anybody watch trannies?
Why do you have a pavlovoan reflex? What did your mom not tell you?
>hype
people who get hyped for shit are thick. Avoid hype, it will let you enjoy things more
I played when it leaked and when I finished the tutorial, I realized I didn't want to replay breath of the wild and stopped and haven't played it since.
I never felt like i was progressing. Chest rewards were always small and inconsequential, so i began to just ignore puzzles for them and ran past them instead. I never found any cool or unique items/weapons through exploring outside of some armor that doesnt even do anything but raise or lower my stats. Quickly became starved for literally anything new, but it never happened.
I’m just surprised with how same-y everything looks and feels. With BotW at least they had the excuse that they had to build the entire engine and all the assets from scratch.
With TotK it should have been easy to pour everything into world design and dungeons. Everything else was already done. They had five years to craft a story, music, bosses, dungeons. What did they spend all that time making?
>I’m just surprised with how same-y everything looks and feels
Way to out yourself ss a gay who doesn't play the shit he criticizes
They didn't have to worry about it because they know they've cultivated apple/disney tier morons who'll slurp up whatever they put out without question, ruining it for everyone else.
>What did they spend all that time making?
A story, new music, bosses, dungeons, enemies, shrines, fusion interactions, zonai items, new areas in the overworld, new armor, old enemy redesigns, the depths
>What did they spend all that time making?
Literally nothing anon, just a little photoshop to change up the cover a little. You can go away now
The good part of BotW was the emergent sandbox shit and that's what they doubled down on with the fusions and building. And that shit takes an unimaginable amount of time to program and test to get working even half-decently.
It's genuinely worse to actually play than BotW even if the content on offer is more substantial. They just made everything a bigger chore.
I played BotW years ago and it didn't appeal to me at all. Stopped playing sometime after doing the second sacred beast or whatever.
This emergent gameplay shit just isn't for me. I much prefer more streamlined, tailored experiences. I'm glad for the autists who get to take a break from programming supercomputers using redstone in Minecraft to play with a new sandbox, I guess.
D'aww baby needs his hand held.
Tendies know nothing but goyslop so they’ll praise the shit nintendo shoves down their throats
>Tendies
At least try and hide your jealousy.
I loved it. But what annoyed me was the grind for armor upgrades and the fricking champions following you. It's just a mess to select the right power when the sob is doing god knows why somewhere on the battlefield or if you can't see shit because he's in the way
Why are you still responding to the attentionprostitute?
Because it's fun.
It's like tying a fly to a string.
Would you feel any different about chuchus if they had lips like in the consept art?
I would feel confused and angered that I can't lick or even see their feet
Thank frick they changed them. The jap-pun isn't even funny
Old Testament and New Testament
both are kino 10/10s, even if TOTK will reign supreme moving forward
How much longer until we get tears of the kingdom on steam deck, free, unlocked framerate (consistant 60 fps preferably) ?
a few more months? I imagine there's a lot of work being put into it
yeah i really loved it when it leaked but now looking back the feeling is best described as being disillusioned
don't get me wrong it's still good but now i feel mildly embarrassed for insisting it's amazing
Erictroony, posting in twos is very obvious 😉
who is Eric?
Erictroony, you are aware than your phone won't save you, right?
>eric
>barry
>arthur
do you homosexuals jut keep coming up with random names for autistic shitposters now?
I dunno who Eric is but ACgay is real and he's absolutely obsessed with Zelda threads.
And pray tell, what is ACgay guilty of?
Spam, deliberately instigating fights, never once actually seriously considering anyone else to be sentient and yet continuing to abuse threads with his presence, recycling arguments that have been disproven hundreds of times over, generally failing to understand the idea that different from him does not mean wrong, not functioning as a human being, abhorrent debate tactics like transmission of guilt, the belief that all of reality revolves around him and anything that offends him was meant as an insult directly to him, holding insane hardline beliefs that in no way correlate to reality, projecting his childish reasons for playing games onto everyone
>Spam
Calling people trannies for 100 posts is fine though?
>deliberately instigating fights
So why is it okay to call people snoys at the drop of a hat?
>never once actually seriously considering anyone else to be sentient
Most people outside of Ganker are glorified NPCs. How is this wrong?
> recycling arguments that have been disproven hundreds of times over
And yet, when prompted, nobody can bring up these refutations.
>generally failing to understand the idea that different from him does not mean wrong
Something that's never been done on Ganker before, right?
>abhorrent debate tactics like transmission of guilt
If someone is spamming a thread and calling everyone trannies, shouldn't you at least say something like "that guy doesn't speak for me"? A simple sentence is too much to type, I guess.
>the belief that all of reality revolves around him and anything that offends him was meant as an insult directly to him,
And what's the alternative? Just being a cuck who never asks for anything?
>holding insane hardline beliefs that in no way correlate to reality,
Oh yeah, such as "i wish games ran at 60 FPS" and "i wish this game had a little less story". Defcon 1 right there!
>projecting his childish reasons for playing games onto everyone
HAVING FUN? WTF THAT'S CHILDISH, GROW UP!
>If someone is spamming a thread and calling everyone trannies, shouldn't you at least say something like "that guy doesn't speak for me"?
No. You shouldn't. EXPECTING that is literally more mentally ill than the person spamming trannies. What about this don't you get? Nobody speaks for anyone else. That's the fricking default. Unless someone is agreeing with someone else vocally, don't assume their arguments are connected. Jesus fricking christ.
>And what's the alternative?
Realizing that no game is made specifically to get a reaction out of you? Jesus fricking christ.
This is why people don't take you seriously, ACgay.
>Unless someone is agreeing with someone else vocally, don't assume their arguments are connected. Jesus fricking christ.
When most Nintendo fans in a thread reply to the troony spammer with posts like "based" and "snoys btfo" then yes, you do agree with them. Also refusing to consider them shitposters doesn't help. Notice how not a single Nintendo fan has called out the tranner spammer ITT, even though it would take a simple sentence.
>Realizing that no game is made specifically to get a reaction out of you?
>IMPLYING blatant political propaganda doesn't exist
>implying trash like Gone Home isn't the vidya equivalent of clickbait
>implying the majority of AAA games aren't just virtue signaling and attempts at subversive advertising
>blahblahblah EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD EXISTS RELATIVE TO ME AND IF IT ISN'T ABOUT ME THEN IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!
>EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD EXISTS RELATIVE TO ME AND IF IT ISN'T ABOUT ME THEN IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!
Now you're getting it.
>I-I'm the chad because I believe something utterly insane, look at how based I am
>I'm totally better than people spamming troony!!!
>spends a decade of his life seething about Zelda on a hentai pedo board.
Now you're getting it. Come back tomorrow and cry some more.
Correction
a decade of his life seething about Zelda, Metroid, Splatoon and Xeno on a hentai pedo board while posting softcore porn to claim that fans are posting it.
>while posting softcore porn to claim that fans are posting it.
So why is it that femboy link threads and zelda dragussy threads practically reach bump limit? Am I somehow singlehandedly keeping every single one of those threads alive? Am the one commissioning thousands of artists to make femboy link porn? Am I somehow able to keep up 50 threads of porn spam, simultaneously, every single moment of the day? And riddle me this: how many of these threads are called out as falseflags, if they are indeed falseflags?
just out of curiosity.
>Am I somehow able to keep up 50 threads of porn spam, simultaneously
Given they occur one at a time and are deleted fairly quickly you don't have to worry about that
Ooh, let me guess. Am I also the one singlehandedly bumping the Zelink thread on /vg/? The one that's just softcore porn spam?
>NO, it ISN'T. It's not about how good the game is, it's about you taking every game as being made specifically for you.
why shouldn't every game be made for me?
>why shouldn't every game be made for me?
Because at least 24% of humanity is sentient, and therefore worthy of attention and effort.
>Because at least 24% of humanity is sentient, and therefore worthy of attention and effort.
If even 10% of the world was sentient, we wouldn't be in such a trash fire of a civilization.
>Having a bias against a game and platform is still console warring.
And why would you assume that? Do you think I hate Nintendo, or their games? I may dislike a good portion of their library, but I will also cede praise when necessary. You want a console that I have a genuine bias against, look no further than the snoystation. Whereas a Nintendo game will occasionally garner a high 7/10 score from me, I can't even remember the last time snoy put out anything higher than a 3/10, which is being generous. So I'll at least admit that. I hate sony, especially for killing off so many good IPs for Unsharted and God of Soi.
>You don't have to openly state something obvious that can be inferred from the conversation.
And the conversation stated that I was the only person who disproved the image. Everyone else was willing to believe it. Tell me, why did you wait for me to do the footwork and go into the archive, just to prove that the image was wrong?
>The fact that I tried to verify it and came up with the conclusion that they're under different hashes and it's impossible to find them all is more than enough.
Then I offer you a challenge. Show me every single variation of that image ever made, and prove that it goes beyond 15 pages.
>I don't think I need to give this a real response
Quite clearly you do.
>The one saying you're unable to juggle multiple posts despite the fact that you're juggling multiple posts right now?
Anon, I'm posting in one thread, taking several minutes between posts so I can type. This a little different than regularly getting zelink porn dumps to autosage within an hour, which I'm pretty sure isn't even possible from a single person, unless it was extremely obvious, so the fans should easily call it out as a samegay.
>a-actually, no, nobody but me is worth catering to
Now watch, your next line is "NOW YOU GET IT!!!!!!"
How in the world can you claim you're just trying to have a reasonable conversation when you enter every thread of the genuine belief that you are earth's sole sentient human being? You can't have a reasonable conversation with people you consider subhuman. You said you'd try and improve last time I saw you, now I see that was a fricking lie.
I'm trying to be reasonable, anon. But what am I supposed to say to people who think that it's okay to spam "troonytroonytroony" for 500 posts, or that it's okay to dump softcore porn for a whole thread and drown out discussion? When I'm called a homosexual because I don't care about graphics, by a fandom that also doesn't care about graphics, that strikes me as hypocritical. Why should I have any tolerance for that?
>hah, Nintendo games don't need realistic graphics, they have soul
>EWWW YOU PLAY INDIE GAMES, GET THAT GAY troony PIXELSHIT OUT OF HERE
This is reasonable to you?
>There is no story that hits you with "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying".
I was gonna say that it was an exxaggeration, but if anything your average Metal Gear installment and JRPG is an understatement of such.
ACsnoy, why do you worship moviegames like nu-gow?
>you think it's okay because you don't make the thread worse by seething about and engaging with the schizo who spams troony at everything
Not how it works.
Likewise, the one guy who shat on Terraria to spite you is a rabid BOTW defender. Nobody in their right mind actually thinks he's sane, but nobody is going to call him out because that would be deliberately engaging with a schizo.
>NO NO NO, I ACTUALLY UNDERSTATED IT, WHEN I SEE A CHARACTER OPEN THEIR MOUTH AND NOT JUST TO GIVE ME THE NEXT OBJECTIVE I GO INTO A POCKET DIMENSION WHERE I WITNESS 100 HOURS OF WAIFU SOBBING
Stop it. Actually talk about the game that exists in this world and not in your delusional mind.
Armored Core. Not that he actually likes Armored Core, it's just a game he makes noise about pretending to like because it at one point sort of fit his ideal of "no story" if you crossed your eyes.
Why do you worship trannies and moviegames, ACsnoy?
>Not how it works.
Look at this thread and how much of a dumpster fire it is, because they won't even acknowledge the troony poster as a problem.
>Stop it. Actually talk about the game that exists in this world and not in your delusional mind.
Every time I discuss the problems with the story, people jump to call me a troony because, again, they can't handle criticism.
>Look at this thread and how much of a dumpster fire it is
because of snoytrannies like you
Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
>Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism
Reading this thread, not really.
>how much of a dumpster fire it is, because they won't even acknowledge the troony poster
You are doing more damage to the thread than the troony poster.
>Every time I discuss the problems with the story
No amount of discussion warrants a complete break from reality.
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
maybe 95%, yes. And the 5% are a coincidence.
>Am I also the one singlehandedly bumping the Zelink thread on /vg/?
I didn't even know about that but if you're lurking there then shit dude you're the link between the spam.
All I know is that they spammed their crap here, until the mods banished them to /vg/. again, not a single person called them out. If it was a falseflag, prove it.
My idea of a video game is one where the gameplay is given 100% importance, none of this "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying! 10/10 masterpiece!"
>My idea of a video game is one where the gameplay is given 100% importance, none of this "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying! 10/10 masterpiece!"
Rewards aren't gameplay, ACsnoy
There is no story that hits you with "bro watch this 50 hour cutscene of my waifu crying".
None. Ever.
I don't care that you're trying to make some sort of illustrative point. I don't care what kind of point you think you're making. You have made it clear that THIS is actually what you LIVE THROUGH when a game has characters and a story. This is proof that you are INTENSELY DELUSIONAL. To the point of hallucinations.
>why shouldn't every game be made for me?
Because your idea of a good video game is terrible.
>Notice how not a single Nintendo fan has called out the tranner spammer ITT, even though it would take a simple sentence.
Let me ask you this Doug, why would anyone even acknowledge it period if that's what they want?
You don't have to reply to it, just acknowledge that it's bad. Might be a good idea to r*port it to the jannies while you're at it, but at least show that you don't support it.
>I-I'm the chad because I believe something utterly insane, look at how based I am
Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece? That's wacky and absurd?
>Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece?
No, the idea that literally everything the entire world does is done just to evoke some kind of reaction from you.
Maybe devs should stop making the vidya equivalent of clickbait.
It's not the devs' fault that you mistake literally every game for a personal call-out.
It's not the anons' fault that you mistake literally every thread for a personal call-out.
>It's not the devs' fault that you mistake literally every game for a personal call-out.
Yes, it is. Next time make better games.
>we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion.
Accusing me of being eric, being a troony, being a snoy, and tons of other insults would imply this exact thing, so maybe there's a hint of truth to it.
>but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
I enjoy many games, but you call them all because they're not popular enough, and they don't have a high enough metacritic score.
>Yes, it is.
NO, it ISN'T. It's not about how good the game is, it's about you taking every game as being made specifically for you. No dev has ever thought about you when making their game.
>Utterly insane? You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece?
Literally nobody here has said its a 10/10 masterpiece Numerical scores are moronic but to play this game I'd say ToTK is the closest to a 10/10 since elden ring and nobody cares that you don't like it, we are all pointing out how manic and obsessive it is that you've spent hours in this thread insisting that people are stabbing their pitchforks at you for your objective opinion. You're playing ball with yourself idiot. And of course we're gonna reply to you, it doesn't get in the way of discussing the game, but jesus frick I hope some day you find a game that you enjoy playing too so that it keeps you away from this board for at least a few hours, for your own sake
>You mean the belief that TOTK might not be a 10/10 masterpiece? That's wacky and absurd?
No not at all. You're entitled your opinion. If I don't like a game I tend not to give a frick about it and concentrate on games I DO like.
But here you are, in YEAR SEVEN of your Zelda meltdown. Who are you trying to convince? What a schizo.
>No not at all. You're entitled your opinion. If I don't like a game I tend not to give a frick about it and concentrate on games I DO like.
>goes out of his way to call my favorite game "furtroony pixel dogshit" across countless threads
>just acknowledge that it's bad.
Which is giving it attention. I would suggest people do the same to you but we all know that you're not here for the sake of attention but to flaunt your own stupidity.
>Might be a good idea to r*port it to the jannies while you're at it, but at least show that you don't support it.
In other words what you want to see is something like thus
>>#7377294 posts troony nonsense
>>#7736483 I do not approve of #7377294 so I will say it publicly here is my screenshot of my report even though announcing reports could get me banned
>original anon continues to spam troony nonsense and the anon who announced his report is banned.
>Which is giving it attention.
And yet calling the poster based and supporting it is fine? Because that's what you're doing right now.
>>#7377294 posts troony nonsense
>>#7736483 I do not approve of #7377294
Yes, that's exactly what I want to see. You don't have to announce your report, but show that you care.
>b-but that's just giving him what he wants
And replying to him, saying that he's based is even worse. And yet you have no problem doing that.
ACgay posts porn and uses it as “evidence” that Ganker only posts porn
Believe it or not they actually correlate to legitimate posters.
That said Arthur is the only one that doesn't correspond to a real name.
Yes, but Barry is the only one who’s actually real. He shitposts in the Final Fantasy threads.
He’s obsessed with Final Fantasy XV, a game which is generally agreed to have been a mediocre letdown for a mainline Final Fantasy game, and was unironically hyped for Forspoken, which was an absolute trainwreck. He outed himself on gamefaqs and Twitter and frequently shitposts in VII Remake and XVI threads.
Don’t believe me? Check the archives.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/625386790/
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640453324/#640464515
If the game were any good it'd stand on its own and wouldn't have people chimping out defending it. They do it only because they feel compelled to for autistic brand loyalty reasons.
>If the game were any good it'd stand on its own
I'm pretty sure TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games of all time bro. I mean, I could be wrong about that. Want to check for you?
Then why do you think it needs your pathetic autistic ass desperately spamming every thread in its defense arthur?
>everybody is Arthur
Just stating facts man.
>spamming every thread
Literally impossible, look at the spam, LOOK AT IT, 15+ PAGES, mods had to ban this image, in fact they thought for a moment somebody set an AI to post them but no, it was a very autistic troony
He is pretty bad
I don't get what I'm supposed to see here
Post archive links of that image.
Not him but look at this
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/gq3mc48_kJB3eBvRlfcr4g/
The guy has it saved under different hashes and filenames. You can't gather them all in a single search.
I want the one with 15+ pages.
That's what I'm trying to do.
Because that anon isn't saying anything I have to try and search it myself but what I'm saying is that we aren't finding all of them.
>That's what I'm trying to do.
You shouldn't bother because it doesn't exist. There is no way someone posted the same image that many times, and the only person calling him out is someone unwilling to post the archive link (I'm not referring to you btw).
>There is no way someone posted the same image that many times,
You'd be surprised at how dedicated anti-Nintendo posters are look at this for instance
It was rarely posted at one point but once it was used to force a boogeyman it just exploded.
Let me guess, the anon screaming erictroony is an anti-Nintendo poster as well, right?
>15 pages
Fricking kek this schizo is trapped here
You do see that there are different filenames there, right? I'm sure there IS an autist spamming that stuff don't get me wrong, but there's clearly other people posting that image too. Using your method I can also go to b4k and google a reaction image like pic related and then show the results with different filenames and say "this is all posted by the same person"
Of course he sees it, but that doesn't suit the narrative he's trying to push.
*blocks your path*
Nothing personnel, kid.
Thats a reaction image. It got posted everytime you seethed about BotW.
Meanwhile you literally lie about archive links. 🙂
Sucks for you that I know how to use the archive.
>Dishonestly using the search function in the archive to suit his narrative
Eric...stop, it's embracing, just move on
>STOP DEBOONKING MY FALSE CLAIMS!
Like I said, different variations of the image exist.
It's almost impossible to get them all in one search
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/1N2CqL0oXLCgbBMWItRpEA/
And this variation https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/ZC0gtBHmr6DYCZhDrHIG7Q/
The full image
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/aDhM7NOfRKHUE1XR8HRuQQ/
This edit
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/kSTlRZVnr2cHiiDPeKeqg/
The original screenshot
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/AGkZpP1qU9fB3mLqHwYf0w/
>You made a false claim and then refused to back it up.
Except I didn't as you can see here
I was trying to find what that anon searched in the first place out of curiosity. Along the way you began to deny the spam so now I'm posting my findings so far.
It's not 15 pages but it's more than enough to say that that the image has been spammed since it was made. That's undeniable.
>It's not 15 pages but it's more than enough
No, it's not enough. If the initial image cannot be backed up, then the claim gets discarded. That means there needs to be 15+ pages of ONE image being spammed. That was the claim made.
The whole crap about "b-but what about other images" is meaningless in this conversation, because the image stated that only one image was enough to garner 15+ pages.
Ericsubhuman, why are you so desperate?
>If the initial image cannot be backed up
That's a moot point to make since the point now isn't the image but the act of spamming.
You wouldn't claim that people didn't spam the AloyCado images just because there are multiple variants would you?
Not to mention just about every single post is the same.
>That's a moot point to make since the point now isn't the image but the act of spamming.
Then show the spamming, don't fabricate an image and then try and pass it off as legitimate.
>You wouldn't claim that people didn't spam the AloyCado images just because there are multiple variants would you?
I would be able to back it up without making a fake image. I would also link to the archive for proof.
see
THIS is how you actually link to the archive, with something that can actually be verifiably backed up. And if you think the image is fake, watch as I do the unthinkable and *gasp* back it up with proof.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/atpN9vhdtDN8gnn1dMGBtQ/
>Then show the spamming,
So showing you consistent anti-zelda spam using variations and edits of the same images under different hashes being used for the same purpose isn't proof?
Care to explain your stance? Because everyone would consider that an extreme case of spam.
Like these for example
https://arch.b4k.co/_/search/image/aDhM7NOfRKHUE1XR8HRuQQ/
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/Ue-sQ9JGwWVo3PCGQ9HwWg/
>I would be able to back it up without making a fake image
Neither of us know if it's fake because neither of us know what that anon posted but that's not the point anymore, the point is that the spam you're denying is real.
>THIS is how you actually link to the archive
In other words you're doing exactly what I'm doing with the only difference being that there aren't multiple edits and hashes showing that there isn't an actual effort to spam regularly.
>So showing you consistent anti-zelda spam using variations and edits of the same images under different hashes being used for the same purpose isn't proof?
No, it isn't, because it's not what was shown in the image. Note that both of your examples aren't even two pages long, combined.
>Neither of us know if it's fake because neither of us know what that anon posted but that's not the point anymore,
That's always been the point. Look, you and I both know that snoys are obnoxious. You didn't need to make a fake archive image to prove that. I could've just showed you years of golden sony wojak anal vore and nintendonion images. But I don't need to make fake images just to prove it. The person who made that image lied, and then attempted to backtrack by saying "w-well if you put all these images together, then it's basically the same!". It's not the same.
You could've shown screencaps of all the different variations of images. You could've shown the NTR cuck spam. That would've proven the point. but you chose to falsify an image and hope that nobody would call you out on it. I do not tolerate that in any capacity.
>because it's not what was shown in the image
We've long since passed the point where that was the argument. Once again, you denied the spam outright.
>Note that both of your examples aren't even two pages long,
Anon, they're never going to be because they are changed regularly to deter people from searching them all in the archive. These links I'm posting are just a handful I can find because of that.
That's how searching for evidence works.
>That's always been the point.
No, it hasn't, if it was I would have simply accepted the fact that I wouldn't be able to find them all in a single search and been on my way, but now we've gotten to the point where you're downplaying the reality of the spam in these threads and that's just sheer idiocy.
>but you chose to falsify an image
At this point I'm beginning to think that you're the one who did it in the first place given the anon who made the image just stopped posting. It would fit your current MO.
>We've long since passed the point where that was the argument. Once again, you denied the spam outright.
I wouldn't deny it if you were honest and didn't feel the need to make fake images. All you had to do was, from the outset, show the different images being spammed. That would've been fine. Because the image was a fakery, and the poster refused to just own up to it, now I have just cause to refuse to believe anything else.
>Anon, they're never going to be because they are changed regularly to deter people from searching them all in the archive.
Then what was the criteria used to make the image? Why did you feel the need to make a forgery?
>if it was I would have simply accepted the fact that I wouldn't be able to find them all in a single search and been on my way, but now we've gotten to the point where you're downplaying the reality of the spam in these threads and that's just sheer idiocy.
Tell you what, I'll gladly acknowledge the spammers and shitposters, if you apologize for that fake image. Whether you made it or not, whether you posted it or not, just take responsibility and apologize. Show me that you will argue in good faith.
>At this point I'm beginning to think that you're the one who did it in the first place given the anon who made the image just stopped posting.
If i was the one who did it under the guise of falseflagging, then you'd have even more reason to discard it as a shitpost. Why defend it?
>If i was the one who did it under the guise of falseflagging, then you'd have even more reason to discard it as a shitpost
Simple, because I like to verify things with my own to eyes rather than believing or denying on a whim.
Also the fact that you're trying your hardest to paint me as the creator of the image shows that you have an agenda here.
You most likely made it superficially to force this narrative of self victimisation, but the problem is that there's more than enough legitimate spam one can dig up that it ultimate looks bad on you when you deny it all AND paint someone unrelated as the creator of the fake.
>Simple, because I like to verify things with my own to eyes rather than believing or denying on a whim.
Then you should be on my side, decrying the image as a fakery. That doesn't mean spammers don't exist, just that this particular image is the equivalent of clickbait.
>Also the fact that you're trying your hardest to paint me as the creator of the image shows that you have an agenda here.
Whether you made it or not, all you have to do is apologize for it. After all, you 100% believed the image until I came along and pointed out that it was fake. You refused to do your own research.
>You most likely made it superficially to force this narrative of self victimisation, but the problem is that there's more than enough legitimate spam one can dig up that it ultimate looks bad on you
THEN YOU DIDN'T NEED TO MAKE A FAKE IMAGE. You could've used all of that instead of trying to pull a fast one.
>you should be on my side
No, looking at this conversation alone facts don't matter to you. You're here simply for the console war shitposting but want to maintain the air of intelligence rather than acting like a buffoon like your standard
>REEEEEEE TENDIES
poster.
After all, if you weren't you wouldn't be trying your hardest to say I was the creator of the image.
>all you have to do is apologize for it.
By your reasoning you would have to apologise to me. Not only for believing I created it but also assuming I immediately believed it when the objective was to verify BEFORE believing.
>THEN YOU DIDN'T NEED TO MAKE A FAKE IMAGE
You're right, I wouldn't, but you would to force your narrative. You're far too invested in this for someone that wasn't targeted personally you know.
>You're here simply for the console war shitposting
That's cute. Tell me, what console am I supposedly shitposting in favor of?
>After all, if you weren't you wouldn't be trying your hardest to say I was the creator of the image.
Like you say, at this point it doesn't even matter. You refuse to acknolwedge that the image was fake, because some other crap that's not relevant.
>By your reasoning you would have to apologise to me. Not only for believing I created it but also assuming I immediately believed it when the objective was to verify BEFORE believing.
Did you verify before believing?
>You're right, I wouldn't, but you would to force your narrative.
Ah yes, the same idiocy as the "y-you're the one spamming porn" poster. I didn't realize I had so much money that I could afford thousands of IPs and computers, all capable of posting at the exact same time.
>what console am I supposedly shitposting in favor of?
I didn't say you were supporting one and frankly it doesn't matter. Having a bias against a game and platform is still console warring.
>You refuse to acknolwedge that the image was fake
Unfortunately for you that's not how the English language works, or any language for that matter. You don't have to openly state something obvious that can be inferred from the conversation.
The fact that I tried to verify it and came up with the conclusion that they're under different hashes and it's impossible to find them all is more than enough.
>Did you verify before believing?
I don't think I need to give this a real response, unless you lack the ability to infer you should know the answer.
>Ah yes, the same idiocy as the "y-you're the one spamming porn" poster
So you're the anon being accused of being the porn poster and you made this post then
The one saying you're unable to juggle multiple posts despite the fact that you're juggling multiple posts right now?
I may actually believe the anon about you being a porn spammer into hat case. After all spamming porn would be a lot easier than actually coming up with responses.
That's not even the problem here. You made a false claim and then refused to back it up. All of those variations combined don't even come close to the supposed 15+ pages shown here
And you're still not explaining the criteria that you used for that particular search, if it even exists. If the problem was truly this bad, you wouldn't need to fabricate evidence out of thin air.
I don't understand this obsessive contrarian butthurt over this particular game, anyway. Did any other game ever illicit a similar reaction?
I'd understand if this game was broken, annoyingly pretentious or genuinely just worse than its immediate predecessor, but the worst I could say about this game is that it's hailed as the best game of all time when it's genuinely bland as shit sometimes, which isn't unique to this game, within or without its series.
It's a falseflag. The image posted here
is a lie. Unlike that bumbling buffoon, I'll even show you the archive link so you can check for yourself.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/image/gq3mc48_kJB3eBvRlfcr4g/
I mean I still see either this exact image or minor variations of it literally every single day on here, it feels like. Same for the "smug Zelda next to counter" image.
This game is just shitpost after shitpost after shitpost. Sick of it.
Why this civil war over the fricking Lego car game?
snoys are extremely mentally ill and obsessed, that's why.
Like clockwork.
ssssh, nobody tell him
>ayo this gameplay be lit yo
>Hey, could you please help me putting a roof over the stable?
>Sure
>done
I fail to see your point?
>in any competent game, this would take 5 seconds
>in TOTK it takes 40 seconds because....?
it's a troonylator bug.
>>in any competent game, this would take 5 seconds
sped up for your sanity
That's your mistake. You posted a snoy movie, not a video game.
Thanks for proving me right, Erictroony 😉
>3 posts
>on different threads
>THOSE ARE NOT THE SAME SCHIZO CREATING THE SAME FRICKING THREAD WITH THE SAME IMAGE100+ TIMES
Try harder Eric
I posted maybe two of those. Seethe.
JUST ONE MORE SHITPOST AND WE’RE OUTTA HERE ARTHUR! HAVE SOME GODDAMN FAITH!
>I mean, I could be wrong about that. Want to check for you?
I'll give it a check for you.
>look at multiple Zelda discussion threads
>"I WANNA FRICK RIJU"
>"OMG TULIN'S CUTE FLUFFY ARMPITS"
>"WHAT IF YOU FRICKED ZELDA'S DRAGUSSY LOL!"
mmmm, quite a game you got there.
Yes Ganker is a cesspit of mentally ill degenerates. How this helping your argument?
>everyone else is a sick degenerate, why can't we join them?
Not the best argument senpai.
Less sales than RDR2
Lower Metacritic than RDR2
Witcher 3 also mogs it btw (more sales than ToTK and BoTW combined, more awards combined too)
I'm pretty sure TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games of all time bro. I mean, I could be wrong about that. Can you check for me?
yea, i'm sure ToTK fits somewhere among the acclaimed games crowd.
Witcher 3 and RDR2 are more acclaimed tho, sorry!
Eric just go eat your chicken tendies already
I still have no clue who the frick eric is and whether its a dig at Totk fans or at the idiot spamming this thread. I can't wait for Metroid Prime, Metroid threads have this ability to avoid this kind of derailment, usually they get derailed into porn discussions which are more productive than whatever the frick this is
Erictroony, why are you lying?
>Erictroony
WHAT THE FRICK IS ERIC AND WHO EXACTLY ARE YOU EVEN INSULTING
>Accusing me of being eric
This is a rogue agent with no country, he just wants to see the world burn
Erictroony, why are you still seething?
what is even going on
A schizo having a meltdown because he can’t fathom that a bunch of people on Ganker don’t like BotW or TotK. He’s been screaming about this “Eric” for literally an entire year. Check the archives for “Erictroony”. More than 80% of the posts are from the same schizo crying wolf in this thread.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/search/text/Erictroony/page/37/
sounds like you need to dilate, Eric
I accept your troonycession, Eric
Oh my god
There is no Eric. Pay no attention to the schizo.
Its always the same.
>I-I-I need to prove a better game exists.
You don't even care about the game. You are just utterly fricking seething that Nintendo fans have YET ANOTHER masterpiece to call their own. The thought of them having fun makes you choke with rage.
Thank you for confirming that TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games of all time though. Nice self-own.
Damn, are you mad over me stating simple facts?
Your smug folder reaction picture dump is working against you lilsis.
>Thank you for confirming that TotK is one of the most acclaimed and successful games
For sure, it's 90+. I think there's what, over 10,000 games with over a 90+ metacritic? ToTK for sure will be amongst those.
All I'm saying, is that Witcher 3, RDR2, GTA IV, GTA V, Skyrim, Elden Ring are all more commercially and critically acclaimed than your game.
Erictroony, why are you lying?
>All I'm saying, is that Witcher 3, RDR2, GTA IV, GTA V, Skyrim, Elden Ring are all more commercially and critically acclaimed than your game
literally nobody cares, those who do don't matter, and most people enjoying this game have also enjoyed most of those games, we're not stuck in that child mentality of "my team is better than yours" but my childhood team is better than yours, they do everything possible to be hated yet they still pump out excellently crafted fun games on the regular instead of making movies and corporate nightmares
>literally nobody cares, those who do don't matter,
More people seem to care about those games hence why they all dwarf anyone game in the entire Zelda franchise sales wise.
>that spoiler
And based on that, i'm guessing you also care too. Sorry, not gigachad Rockstars, Bethesda, Fromsoft or CDPRs fault that Nintendo literally CAN'T compete in the open world genre
Erictroony, why are you lying?
You literally posted wrong numbers.
Erictroony, those Zelda sales are massively outdated
It was the best 3D Zelda yet but I'll still always prefer the 2D games
>6+ years of impotent seething rage
Its OK, traversal around the floating islands is very fun. However the game lacks quite a bit of freedom, like your forced to go through a linear series of events to through the temples, like for the water temple I got there before being told to and did all the puzzles but couldn't use the water wheels, which is really gay.
>totkgay claims his fanbase doesn't get mad at criticism
>while another totkgays calls everyone a troony
This thread's a gem.
Erictroony, why are you so desperate? 😉
Why are you?
>pop into thread to say the game isn't perfect and is merely good
>get called Barry or Eric or something
are you guys ok?
>barry
>in Zelda threads
It's just one schizo. It's funny how the people saying totkgays didn't mind criticism vanished into thin air the moment he appeared.
>Barry
You’re getting confused. Barry actually does exist and he shitposts in the Final Fantasy threads.
>now there's an Arthur too
deepest lore
>now
He's the real namegay, and by far the worst one, in nearly every one of these threads, but you don't hear about him as much because he's on the tendie side instead of criticizing it.
Played about 90 hours. Keep getting distracted from the main quest. Rito quest was absolutely fricking kino though
the zonai device gacha doesn't get shit on enough
>need to stock up on a specific device
>have to go to a specific gacha machine to get it
>shove every zonai charge you have into it
>get none of what you want and a bunch of shit you're never gonna use
they could have done what they did with the bargainer statues, where every time you find a new location more items are added to the shop
>need to stock up on a specific device
>spend 5 small zonai charges, don't get what I want
>spend 5 large zonai charges, get more of what I want than I'll ever need
Plaer IQ issue
I agree, but is going to be the GOTY, again. All because of the trashy media, as always.
I hated breath of the wild and I like tears of the kingdom. Hell, I'd even call it an overall 8.5 or even 9 out of 10.
Of course if you loved botw I can definitely see totk not being enough of a change to satisfy you, but because I didn't play botw beyond the bare minimum it's easy for me to take totk as mostly its own thing.
I like the meal requests from Malanya, but frick some of these recipe distinctions. Why do we have cream of vegetable soup and creamy vegetable soup as two distinct recipes?
Nintendo basically fricked themselves with this game because they made a feature creep sequel that's essentially unfollowable like Smash Ultimate.
The fuse mechanics clearly ate up a huge chunk of development and now kids who started with BotW and TotK is gonna expect this to be the standard for Zelda moving forward. Reusing the same map for a third time would also be inexusable so to make a Zelda that reaches the standard theyve set is gonna take like 10 years now. That or they have to do a total clean slate reboot ala RE6 > RE7 which is gonna piss a lot of people off.
>Standard
Nintendo doesn't give a frick about standards and what they did before. Better that kids realize this early. Plenty of people were disappointed with Zelda 2 after having played Zelda 1, it's a right of passage for kids to get to experience this. It happened for the OoT crowd. They got MM right after it, had tons of fun with that one too and then had to suffer through the Wind Waker.
>It's not MY Zelda
is a once in a generation call and it's overdue for the zoomers
fine i'll take the bait. here's what i think of it so far (90 hours in)
>LOVED
the first few hours. after not having played BOTW in 5+ years, it was fun starting from square one. new abilities to unlock, no hearts, no stamina, no fricking glider again. i jumped to my death almost instantly because i tried to just glide across a gap. and then for the next few hours i kept fricking trying to fly and just fell to my death multiple times. hilarious.
>LIKED
once you're into the main quests and you get free range. you can collect the tears or do the temples, or just run around and try to get powered up from shrines and koroks. lots of directions to go, more than BOTW offered which was pretty open already
>MEH
the story. don't care for it. zelda is cute i guess, sonia too. i just don't really give a shit about any of it. apparently the master sword is locked behind finding all the memories so i'll have to do it at some point, but currently i'm just trying to statsmax and fill out the entire map before getting the sword and taking on ganon
>HATED
the overall performace of the switch. the game looks like shit, it feels really fricking outdated. the loading screen when you ascend. holy shit the loading screen is so jarring, i can't believe nintendo's standards have reached this point. nintendo used to HATE loading screens now this fricking game has to stop and gather it's thoughts when you use ascend in a fricking preloaded room. you're in a shrine, there's literally nothing except me and a couple of balls to move around, it STILL has to load? you can see the fricking top of the platform before i try to ascend
thanks for reading my blogpost please make sure to like and subscribe, we've got new merch coming out soon and my onlyfans is dropping today in honor of juneteenth. we found the last surviving slave in texas and he's going to frick me in the ass while i watch zelda cutscenes
I don't think ascent is a loading screen, I think it's a camera trick. At the speed Link is moving up you'd probably have the camera bopping in and out really fast to avoid clipping into a surface, easier to just make Link the only visible object.
it's a "camera trick" in the sense that you feel like you're still playing the game. i think it stops the world and reloads all the stuff from the top, that's why you can look around at everything before popping out. sometimes it takes far longer to ascend. sometimes (rarely) you just pop through and it doesn't show the screen.
we'll need boundary break or something to do an episode on TOTK and see what's happening while you ascend
>sometimes (rarely) you just pop through and it doesn't show the screen
That only happens when there's nothing between link and the camera, so if you're right at the front edge of something. Like you say you get the transition screen even in shrines where everything's loaded, it's just hiding camera frustrum clipping and making the ability actually feel like something more than the basically instant collision test it is under the hood.
Put Ganondorf in the Hated tier. This has to be the worst incarnation of him in a really long time.
well i haven't fought him yet, but phantom ganon went down like a b***h the first time i actually stood my ground against the gloom. i imagine the boss fight will be like that. i was completely over prepared for the final boss in BOTW so i'll probably be doing that again. i don't mind the final boss being a pushover if i autistically completed every shrine beforehand, i put my time in i should get rewarded for it
It’s not so much his boss fight as it is his backstory in this game. He comes off as a bad anime tier villain this time around, and his entire motivations are lacking anything substantial
>the overall performance of the switch
Seriously this. Nintendo needs to just announce their next gem console at this point. I really do not know what they’re wanting for
>the loading screen when you ascend. holy shit the loading screen is so jarring
What when it goes green?
That's not a loading screen or there would be some kind of consistency in length and it would happen all the time.
It's just so you don't get visuals like this since you're just noclipping straight up.
Forgot my image.
Burnt out after ~40 hours. Reusing the map was such a mistake considering the sense of discovery is the only good part of the game. The depths were tedious and unfun to explore, and the sky islands were just like ten floating shrines. Ultrahand is alright, but they never give you a real interesting reason to use it. It's always just like a high ledge you have to get up or a chasm to cross, so you're always making some variation of the same build. They also stupidly decide to restrict resources for batteries and zonai devices pretty heavily, so you are actively discouraged from experimentation. Game is a 7/10 at best
It's not perfect but I still like the game and had fun with it. I still think it should've been an expansion of botw though.
Other abilities are fine but I don't like this one. Is it not possible to fuse weapons in the menu like arrows? I hate having to drop the item, select fuse ability, select weapon, and then fuse.
I loved the skill, but you are right, they should have done something cut down the menuing, like being able to fuse the same arrows without having to pause for each and every single one, in fact, they should have done what MGS V did with their very similar in game item selection/ weapon selection menu, and allowed you to only be able to select a few items and not YOUR ENTIRE INVENTORY, also maybe an option to not pause gameplay while switching
Should I be selling all the diamonds and opals and topazes and ambers and shit I pick up? They seem worth a lot of money but apparently they are used in elixirs which I never touch but suspect may be gamebreaking somehow.
I hadn't heard of them being used in elixirs but there is one NPC who'll buy them in chunks of 10 for a better price than you can sell them individually.
you need them for side quests and stuff, it's just better to hold on to them. sell one off here or there but it's better to sit on the gems until somebody asks for a bunch of gems and you can just hand them over on the spot. when you realize you sold them all and actually have to mine you will want to have a nice day. ambers are abundant you can just sell those who cares
Got it I'll save for sidequests and better vendors. Thanks Anons.
I love almost every Zelda game, but I especially love Fujibayashi's games.
Game regularly fails the fap test. The fap test is if you're BORED and would rather go jerk off, then it's a shit game.
Go away coomer
What's the matter, am I triggering your latest NoFap streak?
I had my share of fun, but I can't be bothered to 100%.
do I HAVE to go into the depths to farm Black person rocks to raise my battery and roll the stupid gacha machines for parts?
I've been ignoring it forever because that place sucks and that sounds terrible and boring but I can't fricking make anything even though I rushed to get autobuild and ruined the quest for myself because it made me really uncomfortable not having all of my core abilities
I hate the shrines. I want real dungeons and mini dungeons to return
I got so hyped for the wells thinking one of them would be a mini dungeon like in oot
>dungeons
never gonna happen old man. zelda dungeon maker might be a thing someday, but there will never be a solid 3D zelda dungeon again.
>wells
that is pretty disappointing. although i haven't jumped in every single well yet so maybe there's a bigger one with a boss at the end. one with a trading quest like MM? probably not
>zelda dungeon maker might be a thing someday
No thanks, dungeons aren't like Mario levels where you consume them like chips, there's usually the pre dungeon and post dungeon content, all pre dungeon content would be like deku palace before Woodfall, or the ice palace before the water temple. Post dungeon content would be exploring how the area changed after the dungeon is completed. You can't just have dungeons in a vacuum that exist for literally no reason
>I got so hyped for the wells thinking one of them would be a mini dungeon like in oot
You only have yourself to blame N64 babby. And yes, shrines are shit and I hope they never come back.
>You only have yourself to blame N64 babby
What do you mean? Do you mean to say I should not have expected some meaty dungeons in a Zelda game that took more development time than every other Zelda game ever released? Yeah I guess that was dumb, to expect to have the things the game series is actually known for
tbh I'll probably skip BoTW 3 if they don't straight up show dungeons before release, frick this
Ooh, Erictroony is still SEETHING at having been found out 😉
Is Eric in the room with us right now?
Erictroony, you are in the thread.
Because you made it.
Is it really that hard to fathom that more than one person can share a negative opinion on a game, Erictroony-schizo?
Erictroony, why do you worship subhumans?
Erictroony-schizo, why are you so obsessed with someone who doesn’t exist?
Erictroony, you always try that.
Why are you so bad at hiding?
Jesus christ I've been away from the computer for a long while and come back to see this idiot is still spamming this thread while claiming everybody else but him is obsessed and delusional. You're not getting any more (you)s from me homosexual, but its hilarious that you haven't mentioned a single game that does the things this game does better, you're just here stirring the shit pot thinking its bothering people when we're all just in awe at you
>find the FINRA woods excavation site
>Looks cool as frick as I go down into it
>It's literally a single room with a puzzle solved in 2 seconds with a large zonai charge as the reward
Come on man, give me fricking SOMETHING
ANYTHING
please
I give it a 7 or 8/10, and that's being very generous. Liked it more than BotW, but I had more expectations with this and was hopeful that they'd learn from their mistakes and listen to what fans wanted out of a new open world Zelda (mainly better dungeons), and they did frick all with it.
Nintendo has this weird habit of sticking with shit that fans don't like and doubling or tripling down on it.
I liked BOTW more tbh, this game feels way oversaturated, the story makes absolutely 0 sense (hell, people are wondering if it even connects to BOTW on the timeline). The calm and quiet feel of BOTW with a relatively natural open world and still things to do was done perfectly. In TOTK, it feels like at every half meter there is a puzzle, chest, or encounter. It has nice gameplay but BOTW was a much better game from my perspective.
So are Eric and Erictroony dofferent things or is anon calling Eric Erictroony
Shit thread tbh
>Totk is perfect in every way
>No it's not
>Omg acgay is here everyone
Literally read what the frick you're even saying you homosexuals
>Literally read what the frick you're even saying
You're saying this after admitting to not reading the thread.
Lol, I ain't reading your gay ass wall of texts
>YOU'RE SEETHING, YOU MUST BE SOOO MAD YOU'RE JUST SEETHING SO HARD
meh, honestly not
I hate Zoomerspeak so much
Erictroony, why are you having a mental breakdown FRFR?
I still love it. Can't decide if it's a better experience than BotW or not, but it's pretty close.
Somehow, ACgay has returned.
Who is ACgay? What is AC? Assassin’s Creed?
Armored Core, ACgay's favorite franchise
Can't wait until the new one comes out and has cutscenes
bros is it worth to buy a Nintendo Switch now just to play zelda, some pokemon and mario kart or should i go for ps5?
I mean, do you have any games for PS5 that you want to play that aren't already on steam/epic?
some PS5 exclusive games but not much really, the thing is my pc already satisfies me and i also have one ps4, would like to play some nintendo exclusivve shit but ps5 will prob have a longer lifespam?
I'd say wait for next year and see if Nintendo says anything a new console, while I've enjoyed my fisher price tablet this shit is already past its lifespan and its about time Nintendo throws a bigger bone to the devs. Try emulating Zelda if its one of the main games you want to try out.
Just get a good PC. Sony and Microsoft are both putting their games on PC now, and you can easily emulate Nintendo games.
>moving my contraption
>accidentally shake my controller a little
>it falls apart
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING
If the whole thing fell apart you latched onto the wrong part.
Reminder that ACgay intentionally skips levels and puzzles because he's a casual.
>BOTW and TOTK are supposed to be about freedom and non-linearity
>wait wtf why are you skipping everything?
>ACgay is bad at videogames
Now this explains a lot
>doesn't understand sarcasm
No wonder you guys hate kaizo games so much.
>Orrrr maybe we can handle criticism and even have criticisms of our own but don't think your criticisms make any sense.
Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
>ACsnoy seething at people pointing out it is bad at games
and yes
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
98% of your criticisms are bad. I agree with the one about the sage cutscenes repeating over and over again but that's it.
what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games? And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
>W-WELL THAT'S NOT ENOUGH TO CALL THE GAME SHIT!
It's a good thing I don't do that.
all troony-tier and moronic
What about them? Most of those have been rebutted in every thread you bring them up in.
Point stands. Critics aren't bad, but you're a bad critic.
You've made many critiques of many games over the years, and BOTW is one of the few you've gotten mostly right.
Erictroony, stop sucking off your fellow snoys
>you don't argue in good faith
>yes I do
>SHUT UP troony DILATE AND have a nice day
>SHUT UP troony DILATE AND have a nice day
absolutely something you should do.
Why are you quoting my post
when I didn't even call you a troony?
Oh right, because you don't have an argument.
You've never once given a rebuttal to a single one of my criticisms.
>b-but people do it all the time
And yet a single link, even one link, is too much to ask for.
>bad faith argument
wtf does this mean?
>Enemy AI is already different between their colors so Gold does indeed change the AI.
And yet they all die the same. There's no difference between a regular archer and a silver gold ultra rainbow archer. You walk up to one, and they'll just look at you confused for a few hours, until it clicks that they should probably attack you. Real genius AI.
>Odyssey is a Sandbox game. That said I've noticed improvements of the frame rate on places that previously chugged in BOTW like the Korok Forest.
Wait a sec, I thought the game never chugged even once. Wasn't that "snoy troony propaganda"? good to know that your argument isn't even consistent anymore.
>Why is this a bad thing?
Because I want to skip the tutorial? If it's apparently so good that I have to experience it, then why not make the whole game mandatory? If the content is so amazing, then why let the player skip it at all?
>You can in fact not take out items for build parts during most dungeons.
And yet rocket shields should be immune because....?
>You've never once given a rebuttal to a single one of my criticisms.
I and several other anons have in other threads. But it doesn't matter.
>And yet a single link, even one link, is too much to ask for.
It happens so frequently that yes, even one link is way too much to ask for. Every time you lose an argument you start sperging out and making up strawmen, it's the biggest telltale sign that you have nothing more to contribute to the discussion. You're a bad faith shitposter and you've lost yet again. Case dismissed.
>I and several other anons have in other threads. But it doesn't matter.
No proof = didn't happen.
>It happens so frequently that yes, even one link is way too much to ask for
I think you got that backwards anon. If it happened so frequently, it would be borderline trivial to link to an example.
>you're a bad faith shitposter
Says the man who spammed "troony" 50 times in this thread alone.
The proof is in the pudding, but I know you're too peabrained to understand this analogy.
>If it happened so frequently, it would be borderline trivial to link to an example.
Exactly.
>Says the man who spammed "troony" 50 times in this thread alone.
Wasn't me but thanks for confirming you're a bad faith shitposter.
>wtf does this mean?
It's a bad faith argument because the Zelda series was not designed to be full tryhard mode, game is also easily the hardest one out of virtue of it's design, as you can run into enemies that can one-shot you a lot
>B-but 1/4th heart
Try saying that to the Gleeoks
>And yet they all die the same
>They die if they are killed
Incredible argument truly
>I thought the game never chugged even once.
Nobody has said that. It very clearly is too ambitious for the Switch hardware, we all know this, we all stated this before. It's a miracle that the instances where it does chug are very minimal.
>Because I want to skip the tutorial? If it's apparently so good that I have to experience it, then why not make the whole game mandatory?
That's a stupid argument. The tutorial exists to familiarize you with the kind of tools and puzzles for which you'll use them throughout the game, as well as give you story context to your new powers.
>And yet rocket shields should be immune because....?
They aren't, if you already have one fused the game can't do much about you using it, but it will not let you fuse them inside a dungeon where they don't want you to.
>It's a bad faith argument because the Zelda series was not designed to be full tryhard mode,
BOTW and TOTK are not supposed to be like the rest of the series. Appeal to tradition literally does not work for a game that's trying to veer far away from a majority of the series.
>Try saying that to the Gleeoks
See webm.
>Incredible argument truly
Not sure why an archer magically goes braindead if you get too close. You'd think they'd be a little snappier about trying to kill a guy, but Nintendo probably forgot. Small indie company pls understand.
>Nobody has said that. I
You've been calling me a snoy for years for complaining about the framerate, citing that it's perfect and never once drops. Don't you dare.
>The tutorial exists to familiarize you with the kind of tools and puzzles for which you'll use them throughout the game,
Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
> as well as give you story context
Wtf is this movieshit? I shouldn't need "story context" for anything, you're not making an Avengers film.
>They aren't, if you already have one fused the game can't do much about you using it,
Funny, it's not like there was an area of BOTW that prevented you from cheesing it by refusing to let you bring in OP weapons. Haha.
>The proof is in the pudding,
Where's the pudding? it's certainly not here.
The pudding is right there in your post. You're already screeching and committing a dozen different logical fallacies right off the bat because you lost to yet another anon.
It's in other threads too but I'm glad you agree that it would be trivial to link to them and thus pointless.
>saying that a game is 6/10 is "screeching"
Feel free to link more metacritic and sales articles, since that's the only argument you ever have in these threads.
Concession accepted. Maybe next time, ACgay.
>i-i'm the one that won, not you!
I'm not the one throwing insults around.
>trying to get the last word in now that the thread is about to die because it's all he has left
Concession accepted, cope harder.
>Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
No it wouldn't. Throwing the players into a gigantic world with as many complex mechanics and systems WITHOUT even fricking explaining it, explaining what the controls are, and explaining the expectations placed on the player, would be an absolute fricking mess that no developer would even consider.
Once ACgay, you continue to expose yourself as a clown shoes moron who understands NOTHING about video games. You can only fester on this shithole board because your laughable opinions would be publicly mocked and humiliated anywhere else.
>No it wouldn't.
Terraria says otherwise, and it's a far more complex and fun game than both BOTW and TOTK combined. It's also not movieshit, which helps.
If you want the last word, go right head. Go on, I'll even duck out so you can get it in. My treat. 🙂
>Terraria says otherwise, and it's a far more complex and fun game than both BOTW and TOTK combined. It's also not movieshit, which helps.
why do you worship troony movie games like troonyraria?
Terraria is 80% filler in between occasionally fun bosses. Not even close.
BotW and TotK are considered amongst the best designed video games of all time.
Terraria never will be.
Funny that.
Even the devs disagree with you.
>Terraria says otherwise,
No it doesn't. Terraria is a textbook example of a wiki game. Fricking impossible to play that shit without a guide open at all times. A tutorial would have helped.
>See webm.
Shows boss with only a 3rd of its energy left.
Player using high-powered weapons he would have had to struggled to gain.
Yeah great argument you moronic shitter.
>BOTW and TOTK are not supposed to be like the rest of the series.
What the frick are you talking about? You can steer away from the formula while staying faithful to the series. BOTW and TOTK did just that.
>Hurr see webm
moron no shit that preparation makes it easier to handle that's the whole point.
>Not sure why an archer magically goes braindead if you get too close.
The archers can shoot you while in the stairs now and won't allow you to kneel down to avoid their hits. Also most archers this time also have items for electricity, ice and fire so they can one-shot you.
>You've been calling me a snoy for years for complaining about the framerate, citing that it's perfect and never once drops.
It's because you make a big deal out of something that lasts literally seconds and doesn't come off as a detriment to gameplay ever you drama queer.
>Funny because a good game would be able to do this WITHOUT a tutorial.
Games get more complex over time it's only natural not to want to overwhelm it's player but clearly you know nothing of game design.
>Muh movieshit
>Muh avengers
Marvel rotted your brain.
>Funny, it's not like there was an area of BOTW that prevented you from cheesing it by refusing to let you bring in OP weapons.
You mean tides? Those still exist in TOTK. Of course you'd knew that had you played the game.
Caught you ACgay.
>what about my criticism about the lack of difficulty in both these games?
Bad faith argument
>And how master mode is a lazy padding of enemy health, without changing enemy AI?
Enemy AI is already different between their colors so Gold does indeed change the AI.
>Or how the games both suffer from framerate issues, when even the switch should be running at 60 FPS regularly (since Mario Odyssey can do it easily)?
Odyssey is a Sandbox game. That said I've noticed improvements of the frame rate on places that previously chugged in BOTW like the Korok Forest.
>What about the stupidity of having an unskippable tutorial, in a game otherwise touted for its freedom and non-linearity?
Why is this a bad thing? Even the tutorial can be tackled by the order you want.
>What about the inconsistency of game mechanics, where shrines restrict your ability to autobuild because it would "defeat the point of making you use the materials provided" and yet the game has no problem letting you bring in a rocket shield to cheese quite a few of them?
You can in fact not take out items for build parts during most dungeons.
>Are you saying that every single criticism I've ever made was bad?
When has this not been the case?
see
It was botw with some more stuff. I liked botw, so I liked ToTK
I do not think it was worth $70. It should have been an expansion to botw
Behold, I have now mindbroken Ganker because my opinion was sensible
It surpassed Majora's Mask as my favorite Zelda
not really. i loved the game, you can be the winning different greater gigacheddar and i will be the crying basedjack having fun with games i enjoy playing
>ctrl+f “Eric”
>52 results
Eric, stop posting if you don't want to be caught
I hate how gluing alignment has a tiny bit of RNG. I thought it was sorta grid-based, but it can also be off a few centimeters even when it looks like you glued to the same spot. It pisses me off when I try to use fans and it's just SLIGHTLY misaligned.
Currently climbing up death mountain
Fricking kino
It was my first dungeon, fighting the three headed stone creature on an airplane was fricking cool
so many design choices that frustrate me, it's not "new game bad old game good" I just don't wanna play totk anymore
Rate the zones:
PATH TO TEMPLE:
Rito>Zora=Gerudo>Goron>Zonai
TEMPLE:
Goron>Gerudo>Rito=Zonai>Zora
BOSS:
Gerudo>Goron>Rito=Zonai>Zora
SAGE:
Rito>Goron>Gerudo=Zonai>Zora