The original maps for Scarlet and Violet actually had detailed models and it looked beautiful however gamefreak had to dumb everything down because the Switch couldn't handle it.
You complain about the fps now but before the labotomy it was much worse.
You really need to redirect your anger at nintendo for realeasing substandard hardware and not gamefreak.
Please get your facts right before you attack my favorite gen chuds.
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
You just know
You just know
>lYou just know
>"i-it was the Switch's fault"
>other games are running fine as frick
It's okay, we understand.
games are running fine as frick
>I can't prove it but you're wrong anyway because I love sucking GF's wiener
>We noted many instances where loading times went beyond 30 seconds when loading new areas, but the pain is really felt here in the frame drops. Most villages will slump to a choppy sub-20 FPS mess that, though not massively affecting the gameplay here, drastically reduces the charm of these areas. Oddly enough, performance improves a bit more when you’re in battle with dozens of foes, but even combat portions are not immune to frequent frame drops that can impede the gameplay. Fate/Samurai is far from unplayable on Switch, but overall performance feels subpar — bad enough that we’d suggest you investigate other platforms if that’s an option for you.
>bad enough that we’d suggest you investigate other platforms if that’s an option for you.
Get fact checked nerds
Dayum this schizo went full cope mode
Go ahead, say that other games run fine as frick again. Gave a good laugh the first time.
>Go ahead, say that other games run fine as frick again. Gave a good laugh the first time
>when anon already gave an excellent example previously in the thread
How embarrassing
Ok.
Dragon Quest XI.
No need to watch the whole thing, just enough to realize you are talking out of your ass.
moron
I remember normies youtubers sitting on pla and s/v, no one shat on Mario, not on legend of zelda, not on kirby, no just pokemon because its easily the worst looking games on the system. Oh and lest you forget MOST PROFITABLE FRANCHISE IN HISTORY!!! You'd think with all that money they could hire some tech god to fix it but no~
If you poked it in the eye would it hurt?
Do not tell me what to do. Frick you.
>"substandard hardware"
>filters are good graphics
>the game is efficient enough to run filters on top of the environment while ScatVomit can't even render the environment properly with or without filters
lmfao
Wait what the frick is it actually like this on switch? Might actually consider getting this then if it actually looks that good
Xenoblade environment artists are genuine wizards to be fair, Nintendo had them save Zelda as well.
start with xenoblade 1 definitive edition
360p though
>meanwhile, in-game graphics:
that's obviously in portable mode you dumb fricking Black person fricking have a nice day stupid b***h
Unironically 1000 times better than SV
You could give GameFreak the highest end gaming PC money could buy and they'd still find a way to make a game chug on it. They are, flat out, incompetent and lazy. They are bad, but also have no urge to improve. Until I see them put forth even a hundredth of the effort of other developers they won't get the benefit of the doubt to me.
The game lags even when emulated on a high-end PC.
>b-but it's the emulator's fault!!!!
No. Every single other game I tested ran fine.
I can't wait to see what kind of cope you make up for Switch 2 when it's going to be literally PS4 level (which is standard for mobile devices in general nowadays, mind you) and the graphics STILL look like PS2 level dogshit.
>MUH POWER OF THE SWITCH
little town hero was made for the ps4 and it looked even worse you deadbrain bootlicker
OP's mouth is full of Ohmori's wiener. His ass might be occupied by Masuda's bugs too.
I already said it on Ganker, the problem is short development cycles and crunch times which make the Gantt chart be wrapped up with quick hotfixes in order to have something to save face when the product gets released.
Happens with all rushed projects in software and hardware projects.
> the problem is short development cycles and crunch times
Absolutely not. If you want a good looking pokemon game, you will have to go to a different company.
The whole reason pokemon is so popular compared to mechanically and graphically better games is the fact they churn a game out every year or so. If the game didn't have such a fast turn over they would have died years ago.
It's the same sales tactic as Fifa or Cod.
>First time here and also playing the game since 3 weeks on an OLED Switch. Game itself has appeal, i like the gameplay and mechanics, not bad for an so called f2p game. Tons of content to play through, lots of time you can spend into the game, but:
>Openworld maps, Railjack and some of the other maps are very unenjoyable and it gets even worse in multiplayer. There is no fun in playing a fastpaced game at around 20 to 25 fps, along with additional stuttering and occosional framedrops at the 15 fps mark in multiplayer. Doing relic runs in multiplayer at 20 - 25 fps isnt fun. You can completely forget about gunning except when you like to miss 90% of the shots. Also the loading times are a joke. While others are already playing, the Switch player still has lots of fun with the loading screen. Even more annoying when host leaves, because yet another long loading screen will await you. Overall you're practically constantly on a disadvantage when comparing to players of other systems, not to mention that at this performance it also drains the fun.
Damn.. maybe it is the Switch...
>The Nintendo Switch’s lousy performance is as enduring as the console itself. Grainy, stuttery graphics are synonymous with playing games on the 2017 system, which hasn’t gotten a spec upgrade to boost how games look and run. And in the five-plus years since the Switch was released, remarking on disappointing visuals has been a fixture in our reviews of the console’s best games.
Oh...
>Usually I don't care what frame rate a game plays at as long as it's stable enough, even with frame pacing issues (Hi Bloodborne). But some Switch games dipping well into 15fps just by changing your camera is really disappointing. Monster Hunter Rise performing decently seems like an exception here, while Stories 2 craps itself just changing the camera. Age of Calamity is straight up unplayable. Some of these are first party games and can't handle their frames, even dipping below 10fps...
>I really love my Switch, but the performance alone is making me want to jump on PC instead.
Wow... At least other games play well!!!
You morons should have kept going saying "You just know" instead
You just know
>However, as I made progress, certain areas seemed to incur a greater hit to performance which becomes most evident during combat.
KEK
Switch shills full force trying to defend their 2007 phone specs.
Scat eater slops full force trying to defend his 2000 PS1 graphics game
No one is defending Gen 8 here
>b-but Gen 8
Rent free schizo
>buzzword buzzword
Concession accepted, not let me play real games on my real console (PS5, 8k TV) while you play 15fps slop on a mobile device.
>its a buzzword only if it is used against me so let me play with my imaginary consoles in peace
>falling for obvious bait
You idiots must be brainwashed by gamefreak lmao
You just know
You just know
You mean the prototype had better models.
And since the switch can handle the thing just fine, if they had to scale it down was because they couldn’t make it the game look good in time
The prototype was also running on a PC 50x stronger than Switch, so they could just bruteforce everything. When the time came to actually put it on Switch, it turned out having the entire map always loaded in wasn't good for performance and constant memory leaks didn't help, so they decided to par everything down instead of fixing the underlying issue.
It's the same incompetent hacks who in Sun and Moon couldn't figure out how to switch between animation loops, so in every scene they were loading in multiples of the same character and swapping between them
the memory leaks still happen so you have to constantly restart your game when the frames drop to unbearable levels
Maybe if it didn't load the entire fricking map at all times, it wouldn't run like shit and could have used the better graphics. But no.
>Console so bad even the demo crashed and had to delete and redownload everything
Do shills really...
You just know
because people keep buying their shitty cashgrab exclusive consoles. Move to PC already for frick sake stupid fricking jap israelites.
Why is he so fricking big.
I doubt it.
Even if you packed the areas with trees and rocks, the actual designs of the place is lack luster. Other than area zero and the swampy area with the painted trees. There's nowhere actually memorable in the game. The traversal system also disensentivises you from actually exploring, if you find a cave then it's nothing more than a tiny icecream scoop out of the side of a mountain. The only ones worth exploring are in the dlc. And even then, they're just a straight line.
>switch has weak hardware
>more powerful than the PS3 and xbox 360, consoles that had demanding 1st party games like gran turismo 5 and halo 4
Something doesn't add up.
BoTW/ToTK both run at higher resolution with much more detailed models/textures with somewhat better FPS than SV.