the postal devs say that if you're getting censored that's your own problem

you still idolize violence by playing violent games which is wrong

>I don't
you do. you play games with murder in them. you're a sick frick who's living out his sick murder fantasies through video games. you need to be put behind the bars before you hurt anyone.

He accepts your concession

>you don't know what people get out of looking at a cartoon
Correct. However I do know what people get out of a sexualized drawings of a kid.

It's not real.
It doesn't exist.

Rape is forced sex which didn't happen feminist lapdog and the dude did nothing wrong.

but they can consent to changing their gender and getting SRS???

Yes what about [thing] is a 100% valid. There has never been a case of person using “whataboutism” that wasn’t trying to defend bullshit and save face. It’s just “rules for thee but not for me” in a new form.

>Kids can’t consent to sex because they don’t know any better
>Kids can consent to genital mutilation and medication that gives them cancer
Frick off deranged troony and go back to X where you belong.

>Kids cant consent
Prove it. How can a kid lean math and physics but can't consent? You know child labour was a thing too? AOC is a scam.

School age girl can't understand anything? Lmao shove your study up your ass. Dude wait until 18! Unless you're 18 then you're cattle! Totally belivable.

Not an argument! Sex bad unless it's close age it's magically isn't! Nice laws bro.

>You know child labour was a thing too
Do you want that back as well? How does bringing up the fact some other barbaric thing existed support your argument?

Do you want that back as well?
Yes child labour is great. Nothing is wrong with making money from young age.

I did 60 hours sometimes 70 hours my body did break because of corona too.

Not an argument. Working isn't bad unless working conditions are bad which could be for a child or adult.

>exploited
No one said anything about being exploited you made up this bullshit. If working is bad than ban all work. There always could be laws to support child labour but you pretend it's not possible. How working with your father is exploiting lmao. You just want to argue in bad faith.

>forced
>wage slave
You go to school by force too and you don't make money to end up being a wage slave lmao. Might as well make some money.

>add women to the workforce
>suddenly both parties need to work to stay afloat
>add children to the workforce
Im not interested in whats implied by this

Get females out of work force and let boys in at younger age simple as.

Money is power hoes without money will want boys also will raise children at home and marry younger. Females believe that job is more important than marriage/husband is what's wrong with society since they will marry late. That's why child brides are great and that's why feminsim banned them.

>just put young boys in the workforce
middle eastern people do this, and we all know how moronic middle eastern people are.

>winning
go move there if you think its so great, tell me how it goes

>add women to the workforce
>suddenly both parties need to work to stay afloat
>add children to the workforce
Im not interested in whats implied by this

>Pedophile gets called a pedophile for being a pedophile who should never come near kids
>B-But what about le trannies
So not only do you frick children but also chop off their dicks? Is it sexual gratification for you?

Age of consent isn't real that's why it's different from one location to another.

this is something someone says until their daughter gets raped by a 30 year old refugee or high school dropout

It's law that changes doesn't make it moral since religious morality is fine with child brides. Atheists have no base morals some support and some don't. Now feminist lapdogs are another breed of stupid social engineered subhumans by governmental agencies.

>do you want to have sex
>yes
>this doesnt count because reasons

Straight pedophilia is natural.

It's okay, you can just admit you were wrong.

Shouldn't say yes then.

Don't get mad at me if your niece is consenting to sex

I hope thats not wow man im gonna have to resub with my wod gold now to see how bad it is.

This
Don't expect genuine discussion for leftoid scum, they're subhumans incapable of real communication.

No, but we do see men fricking and abusing animals.

Present examples, then. MadThad is the only one I'm aware of, doesn't exactly compare to that list. Regardless:
>Some people into e-girl also are into 3DPD
>Some people who are anti-e-girl are into 3DPD
So then no one gets a moral high ground and as such you can frick off with your moral grandstanding.

>fiction is reality
you really have brain damage, just like furries, if you are unable to see the difference

If you think there are not subconscious things at play when you watch something... well all I'd say is do more research. Here's a tip, your brain can not separate what it sees on screen and what happens in real life. Have you ever seen an action film in the cinema, and felt more awake, energised, excited walking out, and for a significant period of time afterward? Serial killers usually start out hurting animals, just for the joy of it. Child sexual abusers usually start with e-girl and child porn, zoophiles and furries usually start with furry porn, and then do shit to real animals. Acquiring, seeking out, and keeping that kind of porn is a transgressive act that emboldens them if they get away with it. They test the waters, they build up their confidence, then they move on to more serious things.

>pedophiles pretending theyre harmless because they will never rape a child, despite their porn directly serving pedophiles and being a direct result of child rape they at least inadvertently promote

Black person, e-girl porn is traced child porn
no, getting a filter so that child rape looks cutesy and fun is not a valid excuse for still watching it
you know this
youre a disgusting degenerate and if you cared for what you watch at elast half as much as you care for defending yoursaelf against acuastions of being a pedophile you would not need to sillicit proof from me

if i heard that a pornstar i watch is actually getting raped my iimediate response wouldnt be to defend myself for accusations of watching literal rape, it would be to investigate weather those accusations were true

and makes more pedophiles, what a great trade off
Black person, i have a study for how my dick is twice as big as yours and i never even saw it

people arent born as pedophiles
just as they arent born gay, trans or libertarian
its not genetically inherited
therefore, to develop pedophilia one has to first see pedophilia and thats e-girl

research is not written in stone, written with motive, for profit, and constantly faked now
and regardless, if you just accept your nature without forcing your will onto it then i will instead, because youre a disgusting mindless animal and have no rights as a human being

nice opinion you dont even bother to refute

if you want to act like an animal, then i will put you down like an animal
simple

research is not the word of god and you dont even bother to present any so why would i believe the word of a pedophile who admits he would rather not change?

People who commit actual child sex offences are substantially worse than people who just jack off to drawings, yes.

Also hypocrites deserve to be called out, but that's more of a minor issue.

>accusations in bad faith don't exist!
kys

See, that's different from what a lot of other people define as freedom of speech - traditionally freedom of speech is being able to say what you want without getting arrested for it. and even then, that's only really enforced upon the government. It would be kind of ironic to shut down someone else's freedom of speech (in calling you a racist) to enable yours.

>It would be kind of ironic
But that's how it works. If you want to shut someone down, you call them bigoted/racist/homophobic/islamophobic/pedophobic/whateverphobic and they'll have to shut up or get banned. no proof needed.

Xavier is probably the best known example of a wheelchair bound character. I honestly don't have any issues with disabled characters being featured in cartoons, it's not like anyone goes to cut their arm because they say cyborg on teen titans, but for any kids needing prosthetics it's not bad to have some positive image they can identify with

Thanks. I’ll always be a man and you’ll never have your own man.

You can cope but I didn't say anything that was incorrect. The entire sexual liberation movement was to break wives away from husbands and children away from parents which is why it was legislated children didn't need parental consent to buy contraceptives.

The entire point is to prevent the cases where "she was 17 years and 364 days".

Literally untrue.

There shouldn't be "age of consent" period. Consent or parental approval and goverment shouldn't have any say in that.

I'm not talking about who defends what point of view. I'm talking that local American governments do try prosecute teenage couples for having sex or sexting. News stories pop up about this quite regularly. Less often than female teachers having sex with male students, but still. Relaxing teenage sex laws does help in protecting young people from the government, but apparently this makes you morons seethe.

Use your brain and tell me why.

You don't fricking understand. I don't want to frick children and I don't want anyone else doing it either, but apparently I'm the last person on earth who thinks that that's simply right and not some silly compromise we make because children are stupid.

I don't really care but it's entirely possible to be into e-girl and not 3DPD. If you are into both that's your business but don't assume it's true of everyone else. At the end of the day moral grandstanding homosexuals and people who shit up e-girl threads can frick off and that's the bottom line.

i didnt even use the word "but" once in my reply. i gave an incredibly sound argument. you said you arent attracted to kids but im telling you for a fact you've jerked off to traced art of kids. you need to find a way to reconcile this in your head

provide examples
and I am 100% sure I have never jerked off to real kids, because real kids don't look anything like 2d e-girl

well then you must have some proof to substantiate your claim right?
otherwise you are just pissing in the air hoping it spells your argument for you

well I know I am not a pedo, yet you claim I am, so the burden of proof is on you

>moving goalpost
still waiting for that proof bro

>no you answer me
you havent provided any proof that I can refute, so work on that

>this thing I made up is common knowledge because I said so
people accused rustle of tracing and a Korean artist who drew more realistic things also similarly came under fire on pixiv
both of them did live drawing to disprove it
do you know where the allegations came from? some freak who looked at actual child porn - which was legal in Japan until quite recently - said he recognized some poses and said they were traced. you're basing your views on actual child abuse material consumers.

At least those slavoids have mad vlad
probably gives at least some sort of shit about his fellow cossacks which is way better than what we have

>I don't want to frick kids since I am not a pedo
>wtf be pedo or else
explain your reasoning

what if you found a kid that looked incredibly similar to one of your e-girl drawings, would you be attracted to them?

also face aside, you realize their bodies are often traced right? and even when they arent traced, they are meant to look like kid bodies.

this is all such cope, you are definitely attracted to kids lol

>what if you find someone that doesn't exist
e-girl art is not traced just because you think it is, since no child has a body of a 2d e-girl

>but but but
yeah, no

You see this argument gets thrown around a lot and yet weirdly no one ever has any evidence for it. Even the fricking anti-e-girl homosexuals being pedos have tons of evidence now and that's within recent years, so what's your excuse?

i think there is absolutely an overlap in people that like e-girl and real kids. e-girl is often traced dude

That's a nice opinion, too bad you've got nothing to back it up.

>Being able to demonstrate evidence of tracing means having CP
Are you functionally moronic?

so you have no proof at all, thanks for clarifying that

its not even controversial to point out that tons of e-girl stuff is traced. i cant believe you are even trying to argue this lol

What's a kid to you?

Do you think I became a national socialist for fun or some shit?

Even if you win which will never happen you will have similar laws because they're rooted on you. You will never get ride of feminsim. Extreme changes need to happen which won't happen.

>/ss/
basado and sameo

Most men are attracted to girls under 18. If they're sane they just keep it to themselves because they know it's a social death sentence. It's the crazy ones that work themselves up into a denial of it.

You don't upend hundreds of thousands of years of evolution because some roasties had a law passed a few decades ago saying those girls are now off limits to you.