>the very first entry in its entire genre
>still the best
whats her name, Ganker?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>the very first entry in its entire genre
>still the best
whats her name, Ganker?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Dungeon Keeper Gold.
Dungeon Keeper Gold.
Now frick off, you goddamn zoomer. Go play ten minutes of the new Madden game with your Black person football players before you scroll through TikTok on your phone, you fricker.
why are you angery
millennials are homosexuals pls understand
#NotAllGenY
Yeah, definitely not. Except the fact that you homosexuals are responsible for "My Mental Health" bullshit and Borderlands 3.
But we never played that game, the devs and writers got insufferable during/after Borderlands 2.
football
not genre specifically but I don't think theres been a digimon game as good as the first one
Isn't that game really easy to get softlocked on?
yes there's a couple of things that can soft lock you such as:
A scripted boss encounter
Talking to npcs so much you clip into them and get stuck
Talking to Gyromon to listen to the OST
not him but because newhomosexuals like you make shit baitthreads to farm dopamine
elaborate.
>NOOO YOU NEED TO POST ANOTHER AI THREAD OR A FEET THREAD THIS IS Ganker YOU CAN'T DISCUSS VIDEO GAMES MOOOOODS MODS HELP MEEEEE
have a nice day. soon.
I'M HORNY
short for the horned reaper
im chums with the dungeon keeper
Dungeon Keeper Gold
but thats not the first one
Its also not the best in the series.
that's not the first thirdperson game
'soulslike' is not a real genre
and if it was this isn't the best one
It's not even the first.
Is there a 3D game with a world design like the first half of dark souls 1? only thing I can think of is the metroid prime games, but not quite because DaS1 is way more open and nothing's gated behind items
in what way?
spaghetti and meatballs. Large areas and corridors with lots of connections between them. I think it's the perfect balance between open world and linear hallway
damn, good question
You're describing almost any open world game. Morrowind, Assblivion, and Skyrim all meet this criteria.
no he isnt. if were sticking with the
>food analogy
he wants spaghetti but bethesda games are pancakes.
theres not many and most, if not all of them, are actual metroidvanias with item/ability gating. arkham asylum and jedi fallen order/survivor are big ones. but the jedi ones arent fully connected. each planet is more like a circuit that has a couple doubleback shortcuts throughout.
Maybe. More like pancakes with tendrils. The dungeons are very linear.
Based.
Also:
Metroid Prime
Animal Crossing
Half-Life
Chibi Robo
Mega Man X
what genre is animal crossing anyway? whats the specific word for it?
pedocore
Gives me fricking sheer hope for this board when I see Dungeon Keeper posted. One of the best games ever that's completely glossed over.
god same
I hope lords of nether is good
Didn't know that was a thing, thanks for bringing that to my attention, Anon. War for the Overworld didn't hit the vibe for me.
>that's completely glossed over.
It never was. It has always been a standout in the genre and widely celebrated. Just because you don't hear about it on your Gaias or whatever it is you zoomers use doesn't mean it's unpopular.
Pokemon red and blue/green
pokemon peaked at HG/SS
I like the sequel level up system tbh.
I wish the wall is indestructible
As far as real-time blobbers go, somehow no one ever beat the original
eye of the beholder was good
ancients 1 and 2 were overlooked...
Can't forget Lands of Lore. I like it more than EotB.
It's tough being popular.
>tfw wow was the first mmo
Wizardry
Preferred 2.
are there seriously no good dungeon keeper-like games? there's gotta be.
Dungeons 3 and War For The Overworld are probably the closest.
It feels nothing like a dungeon keeper game, the whole aesthetic is off. Everything looks like a piece of candy or like decoration for your 7 year old's birthday cake.
War For The Overlord is closer with the aesthetics and also closer with the gameplay. The creators did try to make a DK like version. Still not the same of course.
War for the Overlord is good. probably the closest modern game to the original dungeon keeper.
The Dungeons series is a mixed bag. 1 is shit, don't bother with it.
2 and three have an RTS element where your monsters can attack the overworld, doesn't have much depth though since you can pretty much always win just through numbers.
2 is pretty decent, but has some annoying meta humor and self-referential writing that gets old, and the undead faction and story conclusions locked behind dlc, which is annoying
dungeons 3 has the meta/meme humor problem of 2 but cranked up to 11. Like they make a fricking 'over 9000' joke in the first level. this game came out in 2017. The game itself is just okay, not good enough to justify it.
4 comes out in a few months but released a free demo, I checked it out. Plays much the same as 3 with some minor differences, the humor was a little less annoying but still prevalent.
Dwelvers and Impire were promising but have been stuck in EA hell and haven't gotten an update in years
KeeperRL is pretty different, it's a roguelike and plays more like rimworld, but it's pretty fun.
>4 comes out in a few months but released a free demo, I checked it out. Plays much the same as 3 with some minor differences
It's hard to judge 4 from the demo because the levels offered are beginner tutorial ones where it showers you with free units so you can just blitz the level. The biggest problem with 3's gameplay was that the most valuable thing you could research at any given time was increasing the unit population cap. I thought the research tree was going to be tweaked so that you had to be more cognizant of unit composition relative to enemies you were facing, but it seems to have fallen into the same issue of just massing a deathball. It's difficult to really judge a lot of the systems in levels where your research levels are locked to the very beginning.
It also seems to be less fluid to control than its predecessor, which is baffling.
Also Dragon Age of course but you won't find many people defending 2 or Inquisition. Mass Effect 2 was still pretty good but it didn't match up to the original.
Demon's Souls
AssCreed 1
>Invents summon combat genre
>Perfects it in it's first try
3 is pretty gud but
What happened?
With Bullfrog? EA
With Molyneux? Technological advancement
>Technological advancement
He made some of the best new games. Dungeon Keeper, Populous, Syndicate Wars, Black & White, Theme Park. Can't be just technology. Theme Park and Theme Hospital remakes still sell.
Those were time when he had to focus on gameplay. With increased computing power he decided he can do everything and his games went to shit.
Hubris.
He was always like this, the main difference is that when he made up some new system or feature in an interview it was possible in the early 90s to quickly throw together some code and have that new feature more-or-less implemented in a day or two. Increasingly that's not possible with modern game development.
Seriously he was making shit up about Populous 2 back in the early 90s, it's just that all those features could and most did end up in the game cause that's just how game development worked.
Most indie devs don't have bigger teams than he had back then. Should be still possible to do it in a similar way.
NetHack is the only good roguelike, and yes I use that term both the loose sense and the correct sense.
Disgaea 1 is the best entry in its series
The others have more features and mechanics and secrets but D1 is actually fun
Dungeon Siege was vastly superior to its official and unofficial sequels.
Mass Effect
Dragon Age
Stacy
I still to this day play this every year in one form or another.
Im looking forward to Thalyas new game