There are multiple pieces of evidence in the series of Pokemon being "into" humans, yet it's considered a "weird" thing. I don't get it.
There are multiple pieces of evidence in the series of Pokemon being "into" humans, yet it's considered a "weird" thing.
Outside of the Canalave Library thing books, 100% of it comes from non canon media like spinoffs and ashnime so this is disregarded
There's also the dogpilled lady in Agate Village.
Also the gal with the Machamp in Sun/Moon.
Nothing tells us Machamp is into her
Except the fact it allowed her to introduce it to the MC of the demo. Pokémon aren't objects, can't make them do things if they don't want to.
So if fancy knicks says "oh hey, here's my boyfriend and 'Champy waves back, you can take it as read 'Champy supports that take. Doubly so as in-0universe, Machamp are chick magnets.
>https://www.pokemon.jp/special/kairiky_gym/girlstalk/
>can't make them do things if they don't want to
Every single evil team that's ever been in the games disproves this. And having 8 badges also takes away their free will, so you're double wrong. You coping animal fricking homosexual
>every evil team that's ever been in the game disproves that
Firstly, just because people do illegal things does not make them baby-eaters. Ekans and Koffing say just as much in the anime in Gen 1 and Game Freak showed Team Plasma members releasing their charges and wondering why they didn't leave them or want to be released. So no, just because they do bad shit, does not make them bad people.
>having 8 badges takes away their free will
No, it proves your competence. The badge system is a game mechanic concession (can't just trade in a lv.50/100 and sweep), but having 8 badges doesn't automatically tell 'mons to listen to trainer (Ash had 8 by time he went to Johto, but 'Zard didn't listen until Orange Islands arc. Never mind the many times he got the set, only to have an unruly catch the next season (Snivy for one). 8 badges just tells the pokémon "this person is competent and has a decent idea of what they're doing". But part of a trainer's journey along the way to 8 badges is getting to know for, how to care for and ultimately help their pokémon grow. And that's just as much a part of a pokémon's trust in its trainer, so wild pokémon would be able to sense not just the 8 plot tokens, but the ability of the trainer to draw their full potential out.
We don't get to see it in the games, because it's a fricking kiddy game series at the head of a long-term franchise at this stage. but it'd be interesting to see how many you c**ts would lose 'mons because you treat them as things than magical creatures as much a part of the world as the human characters if that were a mechanic in the games.
>MUH ANIME LOGIC
lmao thats hilarious. you are coping insanely hard to justify the fact that you want to frick animals
90% of video games are about you capturing and training wild creatures to do your bidding with. And even in most cases companion mechanics usually treat the character as though they have free will still.
>Free will (complete a set of required actions to aquire character for the rest of their lives to do your bidding which is totally not sligthly complicated capture mechanic)
Any party figthing game is basically about "capturing" and training your party members(slaves) so they help you to achieve your goals. Stop trying to incorporate every game mechanic into game lore(especially when both lore and mechanics change from gen to gen, not to mention anime, manga and other shit), it is pure autism.
>writes an essay to explain why its okay to frick a dog
lel
What type of dog is this?
Probably French
sexy
>And having 8 badges also takes away their free will
Guess I can now have unlimited amount of human slaves cause in 90% of games companion mechanics are exactly this. Literal Black person logic.
Imagine a zoroark being into you, you get to frick every pokegirl you want!
>Imagine a zoroark being into you, you get to frick every pokegirl you want!
That isn't even the greatest part.
Zoroark canonically are very protective about their families. So for someone who's never been cared about (literally 99.9999% of Ganker) it would be heaven.
You could’ve just said Ditto, which actually transforms into people, but you picked the furry animal that makes illusions
Look, NTA and I wouldn't want to bang either, esp not as a first choice, but considering the Ditto might look more like this, I'd pick the furry one with illusions. It's much less horrifying. Ditto's dot eye things IRL would be highly disturbing.
I hate that people saw one episode where one ditto sucked so bad it couldn't transform its face and thought every ditto was like this. They completely ignore the fact that it learned to properly transform by the end of the episode and no other ditto did it.
It probably doesn't help that official merch for transformed dittos usually gives them Ditto's face, even if it's for the sake of making it obvious that it's Ditto.
That's canonically how ditto in the anime transform now. I'm guessing it's to allow the kids to spot the fake when a ditto ep shows up, but that's being logical about things.
>challenge Whitney with your Ditto
>win
>Ditto! Transform into Whitney!
>wake up next morning
>Ditto is holding an egg
What's inside?
>it's empty but for a splooge of jizz
a human with Whitney's DNA
Blame the anime for that, as it's shown to be more than an Illusion there. Like in here, Dawn touched something physical to make Zorua undo his transformation.
no moron, that's not how it works, when you touch him the illusion would disappear
>Frosslass does find humans attractive
>she freezes them and uses them as decorations
That's the girl not latias dumbass.
Why would it not be Latias? The human barely had any development at all, Latias was way more involved.
It was obviously Latias.
pokéfrickers are insane
t. jealous his gf can't fly or use mist ball
Because TPC won't include pokephilia in a movie.
That distribution is making fun of people who believed it was Ash and Latias.
>that was [headcanon]
Sweet Kiss is called "Angel's Kiss" in Japan babies. Never mind Pokémon USA (the US english brand management entity handling Pokémon prior to TPCi's incorporation) went directly to OLM and paid them to re-animate the ending to remove the shot of the easel disproving it was ever the human who kissed Ash.
>Because TPC won't include pokephilia in a movie.
Why wouldn't they? She's a sapient creature who has a completely human body through shape shifting, so I don't get what you're trying to say. There's nothing offensive whatsoever about her having kissed Ash.
Normies will never understand
It's normie to see nothing wrong with it. You need to use some kind of nonsense autism logic to see Latias kissing Ash as somehow offensive.
Normies think Pokémon are just animals.
they are
they eat on the ground out of bowls, they play with toys dogs and cats would
That's just a result of Tajiri, Masuda, et al hating the Pokemon, so it doesn't really count. They think only the human characters are interesting, and they more or less see the Pokemon as mere merchandise products, so they make the Pokemon eat on the floor to degrade them and create an excuse to avoid focusing on them. This began happening significantly after gens 3+4, likely in response to the movies with Latias, Manaphy, and Lucario. It's a "Mario mandate" situation.
it definitely counts
It "counts" in that it's something that's happened officially, but it doesn't count as something that should be heeded in any way, since it's purely a result of higher ups enforcing a bad decision.
It's hilarious you hold the words of the creator and his staff in such high regard, when they suffer the same issues the entire franchise does in that they're never treating their kiddy property with the meta adult eye and mindset, offering hoinest explanations about everything connected to their world - because they're the faces of the kiddy brand when they speak. "Haha, I don't know" 'ooh, we don't know how that EGG got there'. It'd be funny, if it wasn;'t such a damning indictment of your critical thinking skills or cognitive abilities, becayuse ignoring the publicity blub and looking at their games directly tells you ALL you need to know about how they envision the world and its creatures. And they've been quite direct on this too.
Does this confirm humans have pokemon dna in them?
Would explain the super strength and toughness, psychic powers, and strange hair colors.
Probably, yeah.
i always figured that was where psychics came from, some chick fricked an alakazam or what have you and the kid got an egg move.
That isn't the company leaders, that's based writers getting things past their radar.
You dumb little Black person, Morimoto coded Mew in to RG before launch - on Tajiri's okay. There's not a fricking TAP gets done for a new Pokémon game without it being okayed by the director or one the producers. As evidenced by "Tracers of a Lost village" even MAKING it to retail copies because the "company leaders" are the fricking producers of the games.
Sorry, but you're wrong. Tajiri thinks Pokemon are literally bugs. This is why the human characters get almost all narrative focus.
>they suffer the same issues the entire franchise does in that they're never treating their kiddy property with the meta adult eye and mindset, offering honest explanations about everything connected to their world - because they're the faces of the kiddy brand when they speak.
And they you counter a further point of mine by using kiddy-targeting media that in NO way actually delves into Game Freak's mindset when making Gen 1 - 10 20-something year old game developers wise enough to establish a 24-hour shift rota, to get the game made, assigning volunteers for the shiftwork, with Masuda pulling nightshift, deliberately so he and the only other technohead raver in the studio could sit and blare techno all night and not disturb the non-ravers (per his own words) and so grown up, they call Lickitung a name similar to a word for blowjob in Japanese slang (per Nob Ogasawara, who also said they'll deny it if confronted, but at the same point, it's there for any native to see). have a nice day, if you're this fricking stupid. 50% (if not more) of the life-size plushies they've been releasing have been furgay favourites, never mind pitching at straight furgays.
If that were true then they would give the Pokemon creatures more of the spotlight. The fact that they only focus on the human characters should spell things out pretty clearly for you.
That's because of the deal they made with Nintendo back in Gen 1. As I understand it, Nintendo owns all the pokémon as characters, so all or most profits from the merchandise go to them instead of Game Freak, who only owns the human characters.
This garchomp is female
Yes anon. They had the choice of making a male version, but chose to deliberately make a female life--sized 'Chimp. Now why on earth would they make such a choice?
Because it's Cynthia's land shark dragon?
It's not sold as "Cynthia's Garchomp" though anon. It's just a "sleeping life-size Garchomp". They made it female, as they're well aware there's plenty of dragonfrickers would kick up $500 (or equivalent local currency retail price) for a life-size Garchomp to stick a Bad Dragon in (and the ebay mark up, as I got the pic from that, which used TPC promo images of it is currently 500 extra on top).
They're well aware furgays are 2nd most valuable market to their brand. As they're the most likely after kids to buy physical merch before normalgays or c**ts like you.
the majority of furgays are homosexual
They are losing money with this
The majority of furgays you come across on the internet are gay, because it's the only place they can talk about it. The amount of furry accessories for women they sell in most good sex shops would be eye-opening to you.
Feeling sexually towards certain anthropomorphic characters doesn't automatically make you furry.
Pretty sure it does, buddy
That's like calling someone an alcoholic just because they drink alcohol.
Getting aroused sexually is a step beyond your mistatched metaphor.
>you think a bunnygirl is hot? You're a furry!
>you think beer is good? You're an alcoholic!
Beer makes your penis hard?
How about this comparison?
>you think a bunnygirl is hot? That makes you a furry!
>a goth girl is hot? That makes you a goth person!
NOW do you understand the error in your logic?
>you find goths hot? you have a thing for goth girls
>you find furries hot? nah totally not a furcancer at all dude trust me
"Furry" refers to a specific subculture of people, not just "having a think for an anthropomorphic character."
Sounds like coping to me.
that's exactly what it means
basic b***h stuff like ears and a tail, playboy style
>that's exactly what it means
Salazzle doesn't have fur so I'm in the clear.
>the majority of furgays are homosexual
No, the majority of VOCAL furgays are gay. Straight people - furhomosexualry or not - don't feel the need to blatantly flaunt their sexuality as if it's their defining personality trait. Same with the LBGQ crew in general - just because they like to insert themselves into everything to constantly remind you they exist, doesn't mean all the straight people who vastly outnumber them suddenly vanished.
wrong
Tajiri is (was?) a mentally ill freak fantasizing about dogfighting, it doesn't matter what he thought decades ago. The first game and the first anime episode directly refuted the "pokemon are animals" point anyway.
You know what I hate? That old homosexual fairy tale "oh so now you know your wife isn't human so you two can't be together!" shit. It's so stupid. They should stay together in spite of being different, that's more romantic.
Nah, you're cringe. Humans only go with other humans.
It's also a reference to an earlier tale about thr youkai yuki-ona where the man was made to promise never to speak of her but he eventually tells his wife whom turns was that exact same demon so she kills him and takes the kids.
Moral of rhe story being don't break your word because you probably are married to a sexy demon lady also bound by strange demon laws and your demon daughters now have to grow up fatherless doing vtuber shit or opening an onlyfans.
>vtuber shit for no reason
mindbroken
>Humans only go with other humans
Humans go with humans, cope.
Wrong.
Nah, everyone stays in their lane. You can't even accept humans from different countries marrying each other.
>You
Are you project something onto me now?
Don't lie to me.
Humans have been writing stories about falling in love with forest creatures for literally centuries. There's nothing cringe about it.
As warning stories, not something to actually do.
Bai Suzhen is a personal favorite of mine, given she started out as the villain of the story and the monk slew her to save an innocent man's life she had ensnared.
Then in later stories the monk became some other demon and he was just envious the dude got to marry a hot snake girl so he was now the villain so the sisters, yes she has a sister now, team up with the man to defeat him and he just lives with his snake demon wife and sister in law. Bizarre.
>Most ancient Chinese homosexual writes about how sex is bad, be a virgin forever, women are demons
>Less ancient Chinese heterosexual sees this story and decides that actually sex is good, and marrying snake girls is hot, and rewrites it
I know whose side I'm on.
>he's comparing Pokemon to demons
Why do anti-pokephiles hate the Pokemon so much
It has nothing to do with being a furry.
Cope furgay.
The vast majority of the human populace thinks at least one nonhuman character cute, so obviously your definition of "furgay" is wrong.
Seethe furro.
You're the only one mad though.
Human X exotic creature is very romantic and not cringe at all.
furgays be like
Hahaha we have a real knife ear man here haha we will steal your women
But Latias obviously is more than just an animal.
>I saw a Pokemon play with a cat toy, so that means ALL Pokemon are animals, including this one who's clearly sapient and has a human body.
This is autistic thinking, there's nothing "normal" about it.
If you ignore what you don't like you make your own headcanon
Cry harder cumrag.
>sweet kiss
Heh.
Why didn't she say anything?
The girl also had no reason to kiss Ash
it's simple
they want it to be a thing in universe, but if they ever make it explicit then word will get out and the parents will stop buying the games because THINK OF THE CHILDREN
same reason the games will occasionally make reference to violent acts such as pokemon fighting to the death and eating each other but never actually show it
What the frick is going on here?
Cramorant eats pikachu.
>Flying and water type
>Eating an electric type
That bird is just asking to die.
Why would it upset parents? We're not talking about sex scenes here. Romance has been in children's media for decades.
People are stupid nowadays. Don't even bother.
They think you're an unironic pedo if you're into e-girls lol
it's a mental illness to reciprocate
Anyways, this is now an Alto Shipping thread
Still mad the Latias that we got wasn't the Alto Mare one.
Ash and Latias is the best ship in this fandom by far, and you will admit to it
you have to be mentally ill to like this ship
She barely even has a personality, being a damsel in distress
And Ash got more boring every year
To be fair Ash being with a pokemon makes a lot of sense for his character tbh. He just doesn't really get people that much.
Latias had an incredibly distinct personality, what are you talking about
Sure you're not thinking of the human in that? She was a 1D character alright, but Latias had a personality and character arc.
And?
Latias won btw
Why are animal frickers so desperate to have acceptance? They know they're mentally ill, yet they beg people to see their fetish as normal and healthy. Really weird stuff.
What type of animal is this?
Whatever this thing is
, but masquerading as a human so you can cope with the fact that you're mentally ill and want to frick animals.
But Latias is a beautiful and elegant creature with human intellect and human emotions, so you're wrong for saying she's "animal."
Cry more animal frickers
As long as you know you're mentally ill, you're doing okay. That's the first step anon. Its no different than being depressed or having an eating disorder, its okay to be mentally ill. The problems come from people who are ill and either cant or wont acknowledge it
I am not crying, nor will I ever care if you accept my fetish or not. If they put the pokefricking in both PLA and sinnoh myths, you can cope forever.
>you can cope forever
Nah thats what you're doing
I'm not crying, I'm just informing you that you're wrong about this. If you're upset over people being horny for human-form Latias, you have something strange going on with you mentally.
>you have something strange going on with you mentally.
Nice projection. Being attracted to cartoons in general is not a sign of good mental health
It's completely normal.
>porn metrics
well adjusted and mentally well people do not consume porn at the same rate you do.
thank you anon!
But first step to what?
I don't want to change
t. monkey with +1 int
Okay, it's not normal, what now?
I'm still enjoying it
>yet it's considered a "weird" thing
It's a weird thing to openly talk about sex in general you fricking autist.