>parents with 80 IQ, addicted to phones and drugs and alcohol should limit their kids tablet time
lol. no really, enjoy 10 years from now when you see the impact of moronic phone children in everyday life.
WOMEN VOTERS HAVE ALREADY SUBSTITUTED THE GOVERNMENT IN FOR EVERY OTHER ROLE A HUSBAND HAS. STANDS TO REASON THEY WANT BIG DADDY GOVERNMENT TO BE SURROGATE FATHERS AS WELL.
NOT LIKE LAZY c**tOID SINGLE MOTHERS CAN DO EVEN A SEMI-DECENT JOB BY THEMSELVES AFTER ALL.
Anon, that's not the American way. You're supposed to have kids you don't want, purely because of societal obligation. Then you put as little effort into actually parenting them as possible, and if they grow up to be crack prostitutes, you blame the media you used as a substitute for parenting, you blame everyone except yourself, you look in the mirror, pop a Valium and tell yourself you're a good parent. Personal responsibility is a thing of the past, the blame game is America's favorite new pastime. God bless America!
>Government
No >Parents
Yes >what about the grown-ass men with gaming addictions
They are lost, failed by people who couldn't keep up with the breakneck pace of technology's growth. Their punishment will come when they grow old and nobody is capable enough to care for them. Their bed has been made.
internet access and electronics should be blanket banned for any kid under 10 years old. I genuinely believe it should be as huge a legal crackdown as the war on drugs was.
I have mixed feelings because I feel like kids should be more productive, but I also hate pushing the mindset that life is to be spent productive with minimal personal time.
I think kids should be given limited and metered access to modern games. They're deliberately designed to squeeze kids for money and keep them on a loop that feeds right back into more chances at the squeeze-o-matic.
That being said, the controls already exist, and any attempt to enforce them widespread would easily become tyrannical, so shit's fricked
>Americans criticize China for coming up with all these ideas before them and pretend they were initially against it
Reminds me of the social credit score thing that doesn’t actually exist in China yet but does exist in the US corporate world.
No. It's the parents job to set limits to their children as they see fit. Wether some people are something you could call "qualified" to be a parent to a child is a different topic.
The only way I see that governments should enforce these limits on kids is in orphanages, but I'd hazard a guess that they don't really have game consoles to begin with.
>Most people should be banned from having children. >Especially brown people.
Thank you for demonstrating exactly why that's a dumb idea. If someone said that white people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce, you'd go fricking berserk. If we seriously implement this system, how do we stop someone like you from hijacking it for their own agenda? Who can be trusted to decide who deserves to reproduce?
And yet, and there are c**ts like you in every race, who think that their race is the best one, and everyone else should frick off and die so they can have the planet to themselves. Strange how that works out, isn't it?
The point I'm trying to make is that the system you propose is unfeasible. Because it's too easy for someone like you to come along and subvert the whole thing for a genocidal agenda. The very problem you are trying to thwart is the reason your solution doesn't work: human nature. Like communism: on paper, it sounds like a great idea, but in practice, that pesky human nature always gets in the way, whoever was supposed to redistribute the wealth just redistributes it into their own pockets, and boom, instant dictatorship, just add water. Any system that puts the fate of the entire world in the hands of a small group, or even a single person, and just expects it to not be corrupted is doomed to fail, because the only people who would sign up for that job are precisely the kind of people who can't be trusted with it. Merely wanting that kind of power is a red flag.
the ones who need to play less video games are young adult men, maybe age 18 - 35. marriage is down, relationships are down, sex is down, work is down, income is down, every fricking thing is down except time spent playing video games, which is climbing
No. The people should enforce limits on the government, but unfortunately that hasn't happened for a long time, and will only get worse. The government exists to serve the people, and if you believe otherwise you should be tried as a traitor and covered with tar and feathers.
>"Oy vey Moishe the video game industry is crippling Hollywood we have to do something about it" >"Don't worry Schlomo, I will call senator Shekelstein and he will put regulations on the video game industry and cripple them and we will buy the companies with a 90% discount"
Good.
I'm not a kid THOUGH
The answer is no, parents should enforce limits not the government, but also we’re mostly adults here.
>parents with 80 IQ, addicted to phones and drugs and alcohol should limit their kids tablet time
lol. no really, enjoy 10 years from now when you see the impact of moronic phone children in everyday life.
>parents should do x, not government
LOL
LMAO
WOMEN VOTERS HAVE ALREADY SUBSTITUTED THE GOVERNMENT IN FOR EVERY OTHER ROLE A HUSBAND HAS. STANDS TO REASON THEY WANT BIG DADDY GOVERNMENT TO BE SURROGATE FATHERS AS WELL.
NOT LIKE LAZY c**tOID SINGLE MOTHERS CAN DO EVEN A SEMI-DECENT JOB BY THEMSELVES AFTER ALL.
Anon, that's not the American way. You're supposed to have kids you don't want, purely because of societal obligation. Then you put as little effort into actually parenting them as possible, and if they grow up to be crack prostitutes, you blame the media you used as a substitute for parenting, you blame everyone except yourself, you look in the mirror, pop a Valium and tell yourself you're a good parent. Personal responsibility is a thing of the past, the blame game is America's favorite new pastime. God bless America!
just destroy electronics and society will be stable again. do it
~~*Rubinsky*~~
Is the article writer British
>video game limits
No.
>phone limits
Yes.
>Government
No
>Parents
Yes
>what about the grown-ass men with gaming addictions
They are lost, failed by people who couldn't keep up with the breakneck pace of technology's growth. Their punishment will come when they grow old and nobody is capable enough to care for them. Their bed has been made.
internet access and electronics should be blanket banned for any kid under 10 years old. I genuinely believe it should be as huge a legal crackdown as the war on drugs was.
The war on drugs was a complete failure. It's only purpose to fund black ops and destroy citizens the government don't like.
Stop making real life suck and people will not be easily addicted to games.
they can't limit emulation as far as I'm aware
I have mixed feelings because I feel like kids should be more productive, but I also hate pushing the mindset that life is to be spent productive with minimal personal time.
They should.
I think kids should be given limited and metered access to modern games. They're deliberately designed to squeeze kids for money and keep them on a loop that feeds right back into more chances at the squeeze-o-matic.
That being said, the controls already exist, and any attempt to enforce them widespread would easily become tyrannical, so shit's fricked
>kids
How old is the average Gankerirgin?
>your
You must be 18 or older to post on Ganker
>opinion piece
>redditjak
go back
>Americans criticize China for coming up with all these ideas before them and pretend they were initially against it
Reminds me of the social credit score thing that doesn’t actually exist in China yet but does exist in the US corporate world.
I'm not a kid so I don't care.
>on kids
Don't care, I'm boomer.
No. It's the parents job to set limits to their children as they see fit. Wether some people are something you could call "qualified" to be a parent to a child is a different topic.
The only way I see that governments should enforce these limits on kids is in orphanages, but I'd hazard a guess that they don't really have game consoles to begin with.
Banning squeekers from games is the only way to save gaming tbh
how do you guys stay hydrated while gmaing?
I had to stop for drinks like six times now
Most people should be banned from having children. Especially brown people.
>Most people should be banned from having children.
>Especially brown people.
Thank you for demonstrating exactly why that's a dumb idea. If someone said that white people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce, you'd go fricking berserk. If we seriously implement this system, how do we stop someone like you from hijacking it for their own agenda? Who can be trusted to decide who deserves to reproduce?
>If someone said that white people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce, you'd go fricking berserk.
Because we aren't equal.
Correct, whites are inferior to every other race in anything but being ruthlessly psychotic. That's why israelites need to keep them in check.
And yet, and there are c**ts like you in every race, who think that their race is the best one, and everyone else should frick off and die so they can have the planet to themselves. Strange how that works out, isn't it?
Fine, use IQ to determine who can reproduce- oh, wait...
The point I'm trying to make is that the system you propose is unfeasible. Because it's too easy for someone like you to come along and subvert the whole thing for a genocidal agenda. The very problem you are trying to thwart is the reason your solution doesn't work: human nature. Like communism: on paper, it sounds like a great idea, but in practice, that pesky human nature always gets in the way, whoever was supposed to redistribute the wealth just redistributes it into their own pockets, and boom, instant dictatorship, just add water. Any system that puts the fate of the entire world in the hands of a small group, or even a single person, and just expects it to not be corrupted is doomed to fail, because the only people who would sign up for that job are precisely the kind of people who can't be trusted with it. Merely wanting that kind of power is a red flag.
the ones who need to play less video games are young adult men, maybe age 18 - 35. marriage is down, relationships are down, sex is down, work is down, income is down, every fricking thing is down except time spent playing video games, which is climbing
No. The people should enforce limits on the government, but unfortunately that hasn't happened for a long time, and will only get worse. The government exists to serve the people, and if you believe otherwise you should be tried as a traitor and covered with tar and feathers.
Video games should be treated like a lite addictive substance. Completely banned before the age of 9, and controlled until 18.
Just in time for WW3
>should the government take your toys away?
The government shouldn't waste its time on media and make parents actually parent their kids.
>"Oy vey Moishe the video game industry is crippling Hollywood we have to do something about it"
>"Don't worry Schlomo, I will call senator Shekelstein and he will put regulations on the video game industry and cripple them and we will buy the companies with a 90% discount"
Adrian Rubinsky is a character from Legends of Galactic Heroes.
Now you zoomzoom homosexuals can stop falling for this bait.
>israeli people are fictional!
most antisemitic thing I've read all day, you should be jailed.