This statement is inherently chaotic neutral in character. Yes or no?

This statement is inherently chaotic neutral in character.

Yes or no?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No.
    It can be applied to any alignment, so long as the character firmly holds their convictions.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      firmly holding a conviction is lawful.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lawful good, anyone who says otherwise is mentally ill.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lawful neutral. no desire to improve other people's lives is shown--only to cling to a moral code at any cost.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A good person's moral code is believed by them to be more important for improving people's lives in the long run.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is why Marvel is better than weebshit. Actual moral values and life lessons.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >She Hulk episode 3

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > one singular show has a grown woman twerking
        > vs millions if not billions of weebshit shows sexualizing children every episode

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Black spotted

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anybody who thinks all western stuff is automatically good and all eastern stuff automatically bad (or vice versa) is a dimwit, including you.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm right because...
    >I'm just right okay???
    >YOU need to conform to MY world views!!!

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lawful evil.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Neutral Good.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Alignment Threads of /tg/

    The only people who seem to have a problem with D&D Alignment are Literal Retards, Philosophy 101 Autists or people who are blatantly evil under the system disliking being called out as vile fuckwits.

    Every thread on Alignment reveals these three every single time.

    Literal Retards have issues with the rules and their reading comprehension tends to be shit. They misinterpret simple language and are often pigheadedly obstinate when it comes to correcting their moronic ideas.

    Phil 101 Autists are worse than Literal Retards. Unable to ignore their newfound knowledge, they argue incessantly about how the system must work within all these ideas they just learned (or have only ever learned) and blatantly ignore the conditions for D&D's Objective Alignment. They only seem capable of arguing about the system as it relates to modern day, real world, Earth and not the Fantasy universe it comes from, a common aliment for certain types of shit speckled, muppet farts ala Caster/Martial disparity.

    Evil motherfuckers are the worst. Quite simply they will argue at length and with every bad faith argument they have to not be labelled the monstrous things they are. From fascists trying to not have their genocidal movements called out as the evil they are, from people who like to cause others suffering not being properly labelled, to other types who all want to be Good but are so far from it with their beliefs and actions and are unable to reconcile it with the way the system labels them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The only people who seem to have a problem with D&D Alignment are Literal Retards, Philosophy 101 Autists or people who are blatantly evil under the system disliking being called out as vile fuckwits.
      /thread

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Alignment Threads of /tg/

        The only people who seem to have a problem with D&D Alignment are Literal Retards, Philosophy 101 Autists or people who are blatantly evil under the system disliking being called out as vile fuckwits.

        Every thread on Alignment reveals these three every single time.

        Literal Retards have issues with the rules and their reading comprehension tends to be shit. They misinterpret simple language and are often pigheadedly obstinate when it comes to correcting their moronic ideas.

        Phil 101 Autists are worse than Literal Retards. Unable to ignore their newfound knowledge, they argue incessantly about how the system must work within all these ideas they just learned (or have only ever learned) and blatantly ignore the conditions for D&D's Objective Alignment. They only seem capable of arguing about the system as it relates to modern day, real world, Earth and not the Fantasy universe it comes from, a common aliment for certain types of shit speckled, muppet farts ala Caster/Martial disparity.

        Evil motherfuckers are the worst. Quite simply they will argue at length and with every bad faith argument they have to not be labelled the monstrous things they are. From fascists trying to not have their genocidal movements called out as the evil they are, from people who like to cause others suffering not being properly labelled, to other types who all want to be Good but are so far from it with their beliefs and actions and are unable to reconcile it with the way the system labels them.

        >evil motherfucker insists he has absolute knowledge of what is or is not evil
        classic move, many such cases.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is both Lawful and Good.

    Funnily enough I remember when this comic came out and people utterly despised that speech. And a few comics later some journalist who seemed to be a writer's pet mouthpiece basically took Steve to task and tore him down as a relic who didn't understand what America was any more, and who was hopelessly out of touch, as were his morals.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >And a few comics later some journalist who seemed to be a writer's pet mouthpiece basically took Steve to task and tore him down as a relic who didn't understand what America was any more, and who was hopelessly out of touch, as were his morals.
      Ah yes, that sounds like a ~~*journalist*~~ alright.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Taking Cap to task for not being in touch with ephemeral bullshit like MySpace and he just sits there and takes it. Fuck Paul Jenkins.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That statement is of Based alignment, quite literally.

Your email address will not be published.