Unity issues new statement on the runtime fee

https://twitter.com/unity/status/1702077049425596900

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    reminder
    >On September 6, 2023, John Riccitiello, President and CEO of Unity Software Inc (NYSE:U), sold 2,000 shares of the company, 50,000 shares within this year.
    >Several others on Unity's board of directors also sold shares in the past few weeks, including president of growth Tomer Bar-Zeev who sold 37.5k shares on 1st September, for around $1.4m. Shlomo Dovrat, meanwhile, sold 68k shares on 30th August for around $2.5m.
    >in·sid·er trad·ing (/inˌsīdər ˈtrādiNG/) noun
    >"the illegal practice of trading on the stock exchange to one's own advantage through having access to confidential information."

    >Tomer Bar-Zeev
    >Shlomo Dovrat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      CEOs can't be charged with insider trading, already ruled by Congress in a past case.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        by the people for the people

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Which is retarded.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well, no. Most of the time sales of shares have to be approved in advance and happen at set times during the year.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Doesn't mean you can't plan around it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why am I not surprised

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unless congress passed a law, which they didnt, congress doesnt fucking rule on anything. Of course CEO's are liable for insider trading. Whether or not the SEC decides to take action is a different matter.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not how it works. Congress supersedes presidential authority. Did you really think anything mattered in the "free world"?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That is how it works. Congress does not create legal precedent, SCOTUS does. Like the other anon said, unless Congress signed in a new law, they have no authority to declare that CEO's can't be charged with insider trading.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              anon a governor has literally banned the 2nd amendment in their state

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Congress can also not be charged for insider trading

        OH SAY CAN YOU SEE

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the very law that should apply to CEOs most, doesn't
        one big club and you ain't in it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          except it does if they don't do it by the book and the SEC loves high profile cases
          but in this case here they sold their own shares according to the regulations, idk why anons are saying this is illegal

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I guarantee a republican congress made that decision.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          considering the view itself is republican, this is a no brainer.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol I love Sulla-era politics, now can we start having Triumvirates already?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We had a weak ass version of Sulla, didn't even purge anybody.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Check how many shares they own and you'll see a few thousands means fucking nothing. God I fucking hate this kind of shitty outrage-bait journalism.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hello mr merchant.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >everything is somehow the garden gnomes even when it's an American CEO selling 0.5% of his shares legally under SEC rules that have been in place for decades

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's just banter senpai.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Shlomo is not gnomish
            >Americans can't be garden gnomes
            >SEC is not headed by a garden gnome
            >SEC members haven't been writing op-eds about how the SEC is over-regulated
            >selling a small amount of your total shares means it's not insider trading
            >selling shares through legal exchanges means it's not insider trading
            >SEC rules are somehow more valid/authoritative/ethical if they've "been in place for decades"
            >CEOs selling millions of dollars worth of shares before an announcement about a complete overhaul of the pricing model raises no eyebrows
            >questioning any of this anti-semitism

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            109 countries can't be wrong

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It means a lot to the investors they fucked.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it doesn't matter if they only did a little bit of insider trading, goym

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Found the garden gnome
        But just for shits, please tell us how many shares they each own, since you feel so called to defend this as a minute portion of their totals

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Shlomo Dovrat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >shlomo

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bootlickers will look at this and still say "I don't see anything wrong with the Unity change."

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If I didn't understand the market and SEC rules I would agree with you.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That can't be his name. This almost as hilarious as Goldman Sachs (Gold Sachs Man).

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Shlomo Dovrat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is literally just looting. white collar looting

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wtf i don't hate these changes anymore

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine anyone actually being prosecuted for this. Nancy Pelosi would be serving 50 lifetime sentences if this shit was enforced.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Schlomo the rat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Shlomo Dovrat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >garden gnomes buy unity last year
      >literally holocaust the entire gaming market
      >if this is allowed to happen, nothing stops them from repeating this with every other engine that gets popular

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I didn't realize Shlomo was a real name. I thought it was just an insult like moron or garden gnome.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        protip: stereotypes become a thing because they're at least partially true if not entirely true
        Tyrone is also a common name among blacks in the US

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        schlomo is like tyrone, chang, nguyen, and pajeet. actual names but used in a racist way.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Shlomo Dovrat

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Tomer Bar-Zeev
      I can't believe Tomar LITERALLY pulled another one of his iconic pyramid schemes just so he could buy 30,000 pounds of roast beef.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, his feeder fetish is getting out of control.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why do they all have funny last names?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're Ace Attorney characters.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >schlomo
      I'M NOOOOOOOOOOTICING

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is what right wing cücks defend
      AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I bet they will get arrested and put in jail any day now ... i bet

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol they are not backing down, anyone who accept this shit deserves to be raped by Unity.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hollow Knight Silksong isn't going to release until 2026 now due to them moving engines

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What engine are they switching to? game maker or gadot?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        RPG maker MV

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously not godot, they're actually respectable successful developers who knows their shit.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          what is wrong with gadot

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Wondor Womon 1984. Worst shit I've ever seen.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >source: my literal asshole

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You meant to post
      >Hollow Knight Silksong isn't going to release

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reprogramming an entire game where most of the dev time comes from hand drawing every asset doesn't sound that bad.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    charging per install and not per sales count is full retard

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    doesn't matter. The fact they brought this up at all means you don't even "own" what you develop and are always at risk. Make your own engines or use something open-source. It's the only way to future-proof yourselves from rampant judaism.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how would they even monitor this? drm?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "trust me bro"

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      last year Unity merged with an israeli spyware company

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        source?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ironforge

          at the time i speculated that they wanted them for telemetry/ad integration expertise. right now i have no idea

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >right now i have no idea
            Bro, it's obviously their spyware that's going to be integrated to track installs.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              they would've had to have done that years ago for this to really work. genshin impact and other mobile giants are probably developed on some offshoot of unity from 2016. bringing in ironforge now won't help them add spyware to those games.

              the thing ironforge malware guys CAN do is try to fuck around with the ad services and do data analysis, which is what i figured they would be doing

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Still retarded and I hope Unity goes under for this garden gnomeery

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Even if they backtracked completely, you'd have to be fucking retarded to ever want to use Unity again in any capacity. The engine is dead in the water.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Correct. Any semblance of trust is gone. They've shown they're willing to rugpull you at a moment's notice.
        Every dev with the capability to do so will switch engines and nobody on earth is going to choose to start their new project in Unity.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If they go under they will be bought by China and will get merged under Unity China. Mihoyo which is a major shareholders will win and control gacha games

      >https://blog.unity.com/news/unity-forms-new-venture-to-manage-china-operations

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fucking hell they're really not backtracking?

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >let's do some damage control but not really

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we will work directly with you...6 months after we've sat on your money

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No developer in their right mind will ever use unity ever again, even if they remove the fees completely there is no going back, Unity is dead.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What will they use instead?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unreal is actually free

        Git gud and make their own engines

        Or use something like gamemaker IDK

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          not completely free but yeah
          if you're a 3D developer you're moving to Unreal
          godot looks like a good option until you actually start using it, it's just not properly 3D-ready for a lot of different projects
          2D it's all godot and gamemaker

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are several engines out there, some of them are free too.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unreal, Godot, RPGMaker,

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        3D: Unreal
        2D: Godot (unless ur making a console game)

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >free to play game with in-game store gets 2 million downloads
    >the cash-shop makes $200,000 dollars
    >the dev now owes unity $400,000 in fees

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not even a meme: see

      [...]

      A game with a low monetisation model is showing that they'd owe more than 100% of their revenue.
      Which just mean they're forced to switch to a high monetisation model and squeeze kids for every penny they're worth.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The pr guy has to be the most unlucky gay in the world to try to spin this shit into a good thing

    Also unity isn't changing shit. They're just trying to appease the masses, but its not gonna fucking work because you went OVERgarden gnome

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we are not going to count web and streaming games toward your install count
    Unity games bought on Steam but running in an embedded Chrome window
    It shouldn't be too difficult to change your Unity game from native executable to a web app, right? So this seems like the obvious solution for anyone that already has a catalog of Unity-based games that they'd rather not get retroactively fucked on
    God knows whether they'd still count old pre-web versions of the game being installed such as GOG releases. Probably will considering they're massive cunts.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    these fuckers are actually doubling down with this shit.
    this is actually the end for unity
    fucking incredible

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >standing their ground despite everything

    Honestly nuts but I respect it.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we will work directly with you on cases where fraud or botnets are suspected of malicious intent
    Why even open this can of worms though? What purpose is there for charging a fee for a retarded metric like installs rather than sales?

    Also what happens if I download an offline installer from GOG, transfer it to a PC without an internet connection, and install it there? How can they even know?

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lying garden gnomes
    they won't be able to tell pirates from legit copies
    and someone malicious will go after indies day one to prove the point

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >someone malicious will go after indies day one to prove the point
      Fire up rhe Internet Hate Machine boys, we got ourselves a HAPPENING

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pretty sure someone would go after something like fate grand order or pokemon go instead using emulators. really take the console wars to the next level.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't unity just go with a percentage cut? Why all this fucking weasel word trash?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're hemoraghing money faster than a sieve and this is their dumb fuck idea to get some money from genshin.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Genshin passes the threshold to only have to pay a penny per install though.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity is run by the former CEO of fucking EA, you expect a Ventrue Prince to just stop being an absolute turbo garden gnome?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why didn't unity just go with a percentage cut? Why all this fucking weasel word trash?
      because mobile.
      like 95% of mobile games are made with unity. and while mobile games are very profitable. unity cant directly go after in app purchases. so they do installs.
      you have to keep in mind most people that play mobile games never spend a penny on them. its a very small population that actually spends money on mobile games but when they do its a lot.
      they went for installs because people often download apps used them for a bit then remove them only to reinstall them later.
      this way they get a cut of the mobile market regardless of weather people make in app purchases or not.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I't's funny really. Mobile games used to be the lowest of brow in gaming because it was created with minimal effort and support compared to console and PC games but now that it has gotten popular with the last 5-10 years things have gotten worse for the market again.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >this way they get a cut of the mobile market regardless of weather people make in app purchases or not.
        actually smart if it works out that way.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >this might actually kill the freemium mobile market shit
        this is something I can agree with

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why the fuck did they do it? kill unity on purpose for some reason? hope game devs that are almost finished with a upcoming game don't switch engines just at the end and this is some way to squeeze a lot of money quickly (might do this if they see the writing on the wall for unity or something and think its dead already, this is then a way to squeeze money quickly before death)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity has been in the red for a while now. They're trying to get more money from games like Rust and Genshin with this stunt.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My bro, they simple decided they can steal peoples money out of fucking nowhere, no court will rule in their favor if companies like Miho just tell them to fuck off, speacially in China.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I didn't say they were smart anon, it's evident that they aren't.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Greed.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        greed is a given and necessary
        this is just retarded and doesn't maximize their money

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm never installing a game made with Unity on my PC again.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm repeatedly uninstalling and installing games made with Unity on my PC when I don't like them.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Correct me if I wrong but they still haven't clarified who foots the bill when those games go free with ps+ or gamepass.
    Sony just raised the ps+ price to keep shareholders happy I can't imagine they'll go along with this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IIRC Microsoft and Sony are footing it for Gamepass and PS+

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Microsoft and Sony. At least this is what Unity believes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity says the platform holders will pay. In reality, MS will just kick every Unity game off Gamepass.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    with garden gnomes, you lose

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    FRAUDULENT INSTALLS

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >by pirating a game you can now unironically cost the devs money
      >spoof multiple installs to ding them multiple times
      this dystopia is hilarious

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >90% of our users won't be affected
    but I'm willing to bet 88% of unity users never even publish

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I immediately thought the same thing. They're doubtlessly counting every download of Unity as a "customer."

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. I'd love to see what percentage of users who've actually published or sold games will be affected.

        Not to mention the most glaring problem for me being the completely obscure way that they detect authentic vs malicious installs. An earlier tweet literally boiled down to "trust us bro"

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know, fee bullshit not withstanding, how are they gonna track installations?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if you use some sort of network tracking software, you would see that every unity game reaches out to the company when you start it. there's an opt out somewhere but presumably not for first run

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      trust them bro

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah and how are they even going to track old games that can be downloaded in gog? They gonna force developers and publishers to update their old games just so they could add trackers?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Due to your continued refusal to update your pre-2017 titles with the latest version of Unity Tracker™, we are unfortunately forced to estimate the number of installs made by your users as per our recently updated licensing terms
          >If you believe our estimates to be incorrect, then please contact us immediately so that we can help you gather more accurate data as soon as possible.
          >Due date is at the end of the month. Should payment not occur, we will be forced to pursue further legal options.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Absolute retards destroyed their engine, you need to be a special type of retard to use an engine where the company can just steal your money, aka charge fee, for each game instalation of your game.
    Thats so stupid it reaches the point of absurdity.

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're trying to target F2P mobile games with micro transactions but they're handling it so stupidly

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    who cares. the damage is done, unity is fucked.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >You lived long enough to see the death of Unity

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was about time. Never have I seen such a shitty product be so widely defended. Whenever you have an issue with a game and you point out that the engine was Unity some gay who has been paying to learn to be a gamedev in a south american university for six months jumps out of a bush and starts yapping about how "the engine is not the issue, but the developer, Unity is fine, I use Unity everyday bro". Ridiculous.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Get fucked hollowmorons, now your game will truly never release.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WANT MORE MONEY
    SUGGEST A SHITTY CHANGE THAT MAKES A LOT OF MONEY
    EVERYONE REBELS
    SUGGEST A LESS-SHITTY CHANGE THAT STILL MAKES A LOT OF MONEY
    THANKS FOR LISTENING TO US, BRAND

    WELCOME TO CAPITALISM
    THIS IS WHAT AMERICANS HAVE BEEN DEMANDING YOUR RESPECT FOR

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So how does this net them more money again? They threw their credibility out the window so even if they backtrack on everything hardly anyone is going to risk working with the engine now since they know Unity will just rob them at the blink of an eye. There's a right way and a wrong way of doing this and Unity just went full fucking retarded.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >So how does this net them more money again?
        It doesn't. Companies do not learn that greed tanks their company. like others, Unity think they are too big to fail and think people will just say "oh okay here's our hard earned money" then continue using their engine, while everything is getting expensive and people are tightening their belts.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Only in a capitalist system they can fail by prople telling them to fuck off.
          Meanwhile in sovietnistan...

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >makes a shit ton in the short term
        >execs cash out
        >new people figure out the mess in the long run

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes you’re right making bad decisions that cause your company to implode when everyone stops using your product is capitalism.
      And it’s based.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >muh capitalism
      They want to charge people based on copyright rules, moron, most people will not use the engine and those who already use can tell them to fuck off because no juristiction will rule in favor of unity, unless its japan.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >somebody does something retarded
      >FUCKING CAPITALISM THE WEST HAS FALLEN BILLIONS MUST DIE
      do you blame capitalism when you stub your toe?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      implying this sad attempt at damage control did anything

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      people are still pissed
      everything is anti consumer, nothing is win win
      just garden gnomes bleeding everyone until the calcium in their bones turn to dust

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (Jou)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have seen literally nobody thinking the "pull-back" is a good move or praising their decision. Indie trannies are on high alert for their own shekles, this isn't a fucking xbox used game scenario

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is so many good games made in unity. Especially in niche genres. Or upcoming one like Sea Power, Nebulous Fleet Commander. How the fuck is this even legal?
    >make game for 5 years
    >now everything is fucked

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Capitalism ho.

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reninder that they originally said that developers would be charged for re-installs because they only had access to "aggregate data" and could not distinguish individual installs. Now they're saying they can. How can anyone trust these lying garden gnomes who will obviously say whatever's convenient in the moment?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nobody is trusting them, I think devs are just thinking how are they going to deal with this flaming pile of shit now
      if you have a big studio with people that have trained to use unity with workflows in it and basically no knowledge of other engines, not really sure its feasible to change engines if its late into development
      and supposedly something like Unreal you need actual coding knowledge that you don't in Unity? havent' used either one so dont know

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Both have visual graph code editors but to effectively use Unity you need to know C#.

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we want to acknowledge our confusion
    What confusion? what they said doesn't make anything any better than their previous stament.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >this doesnt affect anybody who wasnt making money anyways
    >only the ones who make money

    no shit

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      unironically that post

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Obliterating customer trust is not a win and will not get them praise. Corporations are not as mindless as the consumer piggies that play AAA games, this isn't going to go over like a balance patch.

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so basically all the garbage loser indie shit that don't sell for shit won't be affect. Not that anybody cared about them in the first place.
    Only successful high selling games are affected.

    Ok so it's nothing we didn't already know. Entire new statement is fucking nothing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      kys, Schlomo

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Pirate game
    >Install
    >Uninstall
    >spoof new IP address
    >repeat
    >Process to bankrut entire studios

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      devilish

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you make a 2D game and you need to use an enterprise scale engine, you deserve this. If you're too fucking retarded to make 2d images move across the screen on an X and Y axis that you need to use a bloated engine to do it, kys

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know the higher up are so high on their own supply they legitimately went "what are they gonna do? Go to our competitors"? Like Netflix and Microsoft did in the past

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >make game
    >it sells millions
    >spend all deserved money
    >now you need to pay for selling your game too much
    >you're in debt

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unity should benefit if their IP is used for a game like Genshin Impact that makes $1,000,000,000 and they know it. The changes are fine

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > they should
      no they not

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then maybe they should implement a license fee like a reasonable company instead of their inane "Every time someone installs a game you owe us 15 cents. No we can't differentiate installs so reinstalls count. If you think someone is trying to cost you money by maliciously reinstalling you can tell us and we'll check on it somehow, even though we can't differentiate installs. ... Okay because you got mad we can now differentiate installs even though we said we couldn't yesterday" bullshit.

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is why CEOs are paid so well. They announce bullshit people hate and then roll it back a little and everyone would lap it up like the idiots they are.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't look many people are lapping it up to me, in fact it looks like a lot of people are just ready to jump ship now

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone remember https://blog.unity.com/community/updated-terms-of-service-and-commitment-to-being-an-open-platform ?

    It's pretty disingenuous that they still focus on the specifics of the new fees when they real problem is that they're going back on saying they won't introduce retrospective changes to their terms of service in the first place.

    None of what they say now matters if they can just change it again in future. Sure, maybe only 10% of developers will be hit with the new fee, but how many will be affected by the next one? Why stick with Unity if you can't trust them to screw you over next? You can't plan your finances years in advance if they can totally change the fee structure with only a few months notice.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can they get sued for being liars

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "we will work directly with you" my ass, this entire statement stinks

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"we will work directly with you"
      That just means you will be redirected to a third party compliance team that has been instructed to do everything they can to maxime how much money they get out of you. 80% chance of everybody in that team having indian names.

  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Send a complaint email

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh sure, a stern email like what these politicians do will surely do the trick.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Okay thanks

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Too late. Fuck Unity. They committed financial seppuku. GODOT is about to get very popular.

  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're backpedalling somewhat from this particular change, but the damage is done. When your game is built around an engine licensed from a third party, you need to have either a very high degree of trust in the engine dev, or total legal rights to do whatever you want with the engine without involving the original devs.

    Small teams will pivot to Godot, larger ones to Unreal, and that will be that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Devs aren't the major problem here, they want to charge nintendo, ps and microsoft for every free unity game install using their online service.
      Either ricci has lost his mind or has some deal with mihoyo to crash the company and sell it for penuts without nobody caring.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What's to stop mihoyo from doing something similar to their competitors in the event that they do buy unity? Actual question because I can't help but think that this is going to start a wave of paranoia that forces everyone to start making their own engines.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Unity is the de facto mobile engine I'm pretty sure mihoyo would be happy just by having unity for themselves and force the competition to move to something else.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >"hey, AAA company, you're good to cover for these users install fees, right?"
        >bill gates and nintendo and gaben and many other game studios meet secretly in a dark room in an undisclosed location
        >all shake hands
        >all nod
        >the next morning the unity CEO wakes up with a horse head in his bed

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        big corps usually have back room deals for their engines that are completely different to what indies get. probably not affected by this news at all.

  51. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Not backing down

    RIP Unity. Would never engage with this going forward

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, they got 6 months to revert their decision but I think the damage is beyond repair at this point.

  52. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    imagine being this out of touch with your userbase

    cant wait until someone makes a good free open source 3D engine

  53. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >go on twitter
    >nothing but sub-200 follower indie "developers" promoting their shit game under the guise of caring about any of this Unity shit as if they're going to be affected
    god this is funny

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      everyone is going to be effected, unity is dead.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >HEHEHE
      > FREE GAMES, INDIES, AND FREE TO PLAY IS FUCKED
      > TRIPLE A IS SHIT
      > THIS IS GOOD
      Fuck you retard
      Indies are keeping the soul alive

  54. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If I was Godot or something I would use this opportunity to advertise my engine as an alternative.

  55. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're really getting confident bringing up their "install count" by the end

  56. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do they still charge you for a FREE game that makes no income? i.e just putting up hobby shit on itch.io?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what I want to know, I play a ton of those.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. They claim they won't charge for demos though and god knows how they'll enforce that. God knows how they'll enforce half of this. They don't even seem to know.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Free games are affected too, yes. even your hobbies shit will cost money

        Unbelievable.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Free games are affected too, yes. even your hobbies shit will cost money

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      probably, and if not now, then later, or theyll just pretend to not notice some aberrant installs from pirate and vengeful and count them as legit and demand hundreds of thousands of dollars from you suddenly

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it needs to make at least $200k

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what I want to know, I play a ton of those.

      Did you guys really not read the chart?
      Theres an income AND install threshold. You have to hit both to trigger a per install.

      And as garden gnomey as this whole thing is, the average dev isn't going to have to pay a dime. This is clearly an cashgrab thats more or less going after big devs or gamepass style buffet services.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Did you guys really not read the chart?
        didn't even glance at it to be tbh

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly, if AAA gaming was only going to be affected I wouldn't give a fuck because I refuse to consume slop, but they aren't gonna stop there upcharging big companies for using their services.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they came for the AAA developers, and I said nothing because I was not a AAA developer

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >we're only targeting the companies who have the money to sue us into oblivion

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what I want to know, I play a ton of those.

      Yes. They claim they won't charge for demos though and god knows how they'll enforce that. God knows how they'll enforce half of this. They don't even seem to know.

      Free games are affected too, yes. even your hobbies shit will cost money

      The game has to make money to reach both threshold

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pure free is fine. There's a revenue threshold.
      Freemium/Free With Ads/Patreon Rewards gets cucked. If there's any money involved, they want it.

  57. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    did they really just double down?

  58. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Godot chads win again

  59. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's a lot of word spaghetti just for them to say "too bad yank, now pay the tea tax!"

  60. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Fraudulent installs
    What the fuck am I reading?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Fraudulent installs
      AI generated Gankercore

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They announced devs would be charged per install of their game. A bunch of people immediately pointed out that people could install, uninstall and reinstall a game (or worse make a script to do that) in order to put a massive financial burden on a dev they have a vendetta against. They are tryin to explain they totally won't charge devs for that, super seriously!... while also offering no explanation on how they will prevent it. They claim hardware ids as if it isn't trivial as fuck to spoof hardware and use virtual machines.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Software can be either installed or uninstalled.
        There's no such thing as a "fraudulent install".
        This is some Hyper garden gnome shit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's up to the developer to convince them that it's not legitimate, i imagine it'll go about as well as dealing with youtube over false DMCAs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity thinks they can fool people into thinking they have some super hidden tech that can detect a pirate or someone clearly fucking with installs.

      Obviously. They CAN'T tell who's actually doing it. In a worse case. They might even just ignore it and tell the dev "Lol pay up gay"

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      VERIFICATION CAN?!
      PLEASE SIP YOUR DEW AND SCAN IT PLEASE

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >hey what are you in for?
      >stole a car and led police on a high speed pursuit, you?
      >I installed a game too many times

  61. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is worse than no statement at all lmao
    What the fuck were they thinking?

  62. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    people can still spoof mac addresses and it would still count as a new install right?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yes
      the only way to stop install fraud would be to force so many security features on every single unity game that developers would have no choice but to abandon unity. you could force an account system and require tpm 2.0 to run games but you'd cut off so many users that your game would not be financially viable. unity is going to need to just make up numbers to avoid install fraud, but nobody sane is going to do business with a company that requires you to pay randomly generated fees. unity's only way out of this is to scrap the install fee completely, but the problem is that they've killed all trust with this announcement so there's no hope for growth, ever. if you're starting out and deciding what engine to use you're not gonna use unity, you'll use godot for 2d or unreal for 3d, unity is so unpredictable that investing time into learning it is a huge risk.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        seems like a pump and dump scheme

  63. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What should I do if I want to make a free porn game now? Unity was literally the perfect engine for it.

  64. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unity has posted on the reddit thread in regards to piracy counting as installs since the installer itself is phoning home, so DRM bypass does nothing.

    Their response is that developers will be given "tools" and will need to file claims and proof to remove pirated copy fees from their account. Devs need to do all the work to stop piracy and in the end still need Unity to approve the removal of the fees. Holy fucking LMAO, this engine is 100% dead. Congrats Unreal and Godot, you've got a lot of new users coming

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what I found most ridiculous. Every case of piracy is supposed to be taken up with their support team (which I'm sure would be a 1 month wait per request at best)?

      Just unbelievable retardation

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lmao
      How the fuck can they even determine if they are fraudulent?
      This sounds so shady they can just start charging devs extra and claim its fraud

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        *claim its not fraud

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >yeah, we have no way of telling the difference between a legitimate copy and a pirated one, just file a ticket with customer service if you think someone pirated your game, trust us, we totally care about this just as much as you do

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what an amazing news. now piracy actually hurts garbo devs. cool

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Enjoy dealing with their fraud department, I'm sure it's well staffed with trained people. lol.

  65. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Insider here. They want to cash-in on genshin impact. There was a recent shareholders hearing in which Riccitiello was boasting about what market share they hold and what part of that Genshin contributes to. Then one of the shareholders asked how they are benefiting from Genshin's success and there was an awkward silence. These meetings are public, there should be recording if anyone wants to go back and clip it. I believe it was the Q2 hearing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pls gib more insider info. Also, I heard a rumor that there was an executive at unity who sexually Harrases people a while ago. is that true?

  66. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we want to acknowledge the confusion
    gaslighting right of the bat huh

  67. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's obvious WHY they are doing this, its just also obvious that it isn't going to work.

    If I owned shares I'd be selling all of them. This company won't exist in 2 years

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >getting millions in extra revenue from chink apps is bad for the company

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. Because nobody is ever, ever going to trust them or use them again.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i sincerely doubt the top earner mobile apps will suddenly spend resources trying to move their games to another engine that they will still have to pay royalties on anyway (no none of them will use godot unfortunately)
          indie devs are inconsequential in the big picture and are a very small source of revenue for unity

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >detonating TNT on all potential future earnings growth or customers for a temporary piece of the mobile pie
            again, doesn't really change the truth of my point.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They won't. Worse case scenario everything in-game will get more expensive in the next 6 months and people have to hope and pray they break even or risk shutting down the servers.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >implying CCP will allowed them to extorting their money makers

  68. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Fraudulent OS
    >Fraudulent Game
    >Fraudulent Install
    >Fraudulent Uninstall
    >Fraudulent Negative Review
    Yup, it's indie gaming time

  69. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Always interesting to see how the hi/v/emind shifts their opinions on a daily basis. Yesterday it was

    >HAHAHAHA FUCK THESE DEVS

    Today it's the sobering realization that greedy corporations will continue do whatever the fuck they want despite justified outrage.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      naw it's still fuck em
      there's no good unity shit outside of tormented souls unless you can think of something else

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Furi is amazing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but i love corporations fucking sideways indie shitters

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well 90 percent of unity "devs" were the most arrogant type of devs. Even unreal fags weren't as bad. They had it coming it and not learning any other programming skills

      Still. There are good unity games I enjoyed. Shame those devs are gonna be going broke soon because of these new policy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Way more people were shitting on this decision than supporting it yesterday. You are lying for your weird ass narrative which isn't even that interesting. Stop picking 2 or 3 posts per 500 and acting like that represents all of Ganker. Fag.

  70. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fire John brotiello

  71. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >90% of our customers wont be effected
    in other words, the only people who would be effected were the people actually releasing games
    no shit
    apology already off to a shaky start

  72. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like Unity and I actually have the Unity editor open right now. But I want them to burn because Ganker showed me all the garden gnomes involved. I'm not joking, my opinion just did a 180 today.

  73. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    unless Unity has a way to auto-deduct from these companies they'll have to take each company to court aka Unity would go bankrupt with court fees alone.

  74. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >statement isn't "sorry we are reversing this retarded decision immediately"

    Yeah cool.

  75. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is like zero chance this would hold up in court right? Retroactively charging people for the use of a tool you are selling them seems absurd

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what's funny is even if you wanted to prevent this from happening and delist your game from steam, you still can't stop it because anyone who bought it is still free to download and install it over and over again

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are rare cases where devs fully delete their game from Steam

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Delist game
        >Still own because of Steam's policy not taking away delisted games unless its illegal to own
        >Ditto for something like GoG
        >Own game
        >Reinstill and fake spoof new ips
        hehehehehe

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But this just means you wasted all your time developing your game lmao

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Retroactively charging people for the use of a tool you are selling them seems absurd
      theryre not retroactively charging people theyre wording it wrong. they are changing the license agreement so it takes into account overall past sales and then charges them in the future based on it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      doubt that courts would care. MS Sony and Nintendo could sue Unity and everything will just get thrown out.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The retroactive charging doesn't mean retroactive before the change, you will only be charged for game installs made after 1/1/2024. What is "retroactive" is that the minimum installs before a fee kicks in are retroactively charged once you reach the fee.

      Example: You create a game and release it in February 2024, you are now in the new fee system. For your first 200,000 sales you pay no fee. However, once you make your 200,001st sale, you are now retroactively charged for all 200,000 prior sales, meaning your 200,0001st sale instantly sends you a $40,000 bill

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine a game getting mass refunded. Christ. What an ass fucking.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Example: You create a game and release it in February 2024, you are now in the new fee system. For your first 200,000 sales you pay no fee. However, once you make your 200,001st sale, you are now retroactively charged for all 200,000 prior sales, meaning your 200,0001st sale instantly sends you a $40,000 bill

        It's worse than I thought

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no it's for sales past the 200k mark, the initial 200k aren't charged

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the minimum installs before a fee kicks in are retroactively charged once you reach the fee.

        That doesn't seem legal because you didn't agree to that when you bought the license and released your game.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >That doesn't seem legal because you didn't agree to that when you bought the license and released your game.
          No worries, when Unity updates later this month you get to either agree to those new terms for the developer account update, making it legal. Or request a developer account closure and terminate your product sales and avoid the fees fully!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It'll just be another example on a long list of stupid boomers allowing tech companies to perform unfair market practices because they don't understand technology.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's made more galling by the fact they changed their terms of service to remove the bit that says they can't change the terms and apply them retroactively. They've outright lied to people who started developing years ago.

  76. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We will work directly with you on cases where fraud and botnets are suspected of malicious intent.
    I'm sure the company who stands to profit from fraudulent installs is going to be perfectly impartial in evaluating whether or not installs are fraudulent.

  77. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I imagine this will also severely fuck over people who make an income from the asset store as well (assuming a mass exodus to other engines goes ahead)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If we lived in a just society the people behind this decision would be executed. They are destroying many livelihoods for no real reason.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not just the asset store. Think of the entire industry that has built up around teaching game development using Unity. There's an entire ecosystem they've poisoned because nobody has faith in them any more.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this one i dont feel bad about. as a dev, screw asset flippers and the horse they rode in on.

  78. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone else waiting to see where all the talent goes?

  79. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So indies are going to stay away from it because they will be afraid of their game going viral like amogus. Pretty ebin.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In a way it's pretty impressive they've created a dynamic where people are actually scared of their game becoming too successful.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Make game
        >Its a hit
        >Get charged
        >Make game
        >Its a flop but years later becomes a hit
        >STILL get charged
        lel

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It really is incredible. I can't imagine a bigger fuck up.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's like the most brazen attempt at tall poppy syndrome I've ever seen lmao, the moment you're too successful Unity is just gonna leap from the bushes and go straight for your jugular

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd call it a hostage situation rather than a dynamic but okay

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      an indie dev using unity can now be fucked over overnight by a tax bill if some youtuber plays them and kicks them over the limit, for being successful, yes.

      imagine you made and posted a dumb joke meme game months or even years ago, forgot about it, and now owe the unity company millions of dollars you dont have

      if you are a working dev. REMOVE DOWNLOAD LINKS FOR YOUR UNITY GAME SO YOU DONT GO BANKRUPT

  80. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so protesting a game via "buy on steam then refund" will be a thing now

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      we've been doing that for years. where have you been?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      N-no anon they will know if someone is doing this (yet to be disclosed how)

      And if you think someone is doing this y-you can submit a mountain of support tickets instead of making your game...

  81. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >F2P mobile game with microtransactions
    >Could have millions of downloads with only 1-2% of users ever spending a dollar on it
    >Gain $200k against 10 million installs
    >"Give us all your money."

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      see

      [...]

      its already happening.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that one was calculated based on his misconceptions about the new model though

  82. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If there's one thing I've learned it's that EU chads constantly have to keep American garden gnomes in check. I wouldn't be surprised if we came to the rescue again for you guys
    >previous credits:
    >refunds on steam
    >not allowed to raise price before discounting a game

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How did you guys get all the sane boomers anyway?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's simple, Euro didn't get the same post war boom America did. They had decent times, but they were still living in piles of rubble rebuilding everything from scratch as their continent was bombed to dust. Greedy boomers are the result of American style hyper prosperity in the post war boom where they were handed life on a silver platter and became extremely entitled and greedy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        NTA but the EU's regulatory bodies are staffed by a bunch of European parties meaning a hodge podge of old/new interests clashing and having to negotiate. EU parliament has coalitions and no single party is "too big" to do anything, meaning the chance of boomers being able to outdo chaos/people voting with self interest is severely hampered
        No one wants to own 500 charging cables so Apple would've had to lobby 100+ parties to stop a vote that would buckbreak them for example

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Europe wasn't subjected to 40 years of russians and garden gnomes brainwashing us 24/7.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The EU still sucks but when it comes to tech shit, yeah. You guys are alright.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Refunds on steam are because of Australian consumer law. Nice try gay.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >suddenly reminded it took years for the refund system to hit globally and it made devs assmad when it did

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        14 day refunds are there because of the EU. I assume everyone on steam from every region can refund a game before 14 days are up and not just EU citizens

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If you from the UK then its 30 days refund on steam.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      at most what the eu will do is make it so they cant charge money retroactively for sales and has to honor previous license agreements with already existing games.
      they wont be able to change anything for newly released games after the change.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and has to honor previous license agreements with already existing games.
        That would be enough. Anyone that's retarded enough to release a game after deserves it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I love that we have the power to tell Apple to stop fucking with the power chargers or they won't be allowed to do business anymore. Americans have the most purchasing power in the world, they could throw their weight (lmao) around and get a bunch of beneficial rights if they wanted but they don't know how

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they could throw their weight (lmao) around and get a bunch of beneficial rights if they wanted but they don't know how

        No we can't, our system is actually set up to fuck us over if we try anything
        >You need insurance
        >Good insurance REQUIRES a job
        >If you become a political activist opposing tptb they punish you by making you unemployable
        >If that doesn't work the CIA just kills you outright
        >Also the same people you must work through in the legal system are the same ethnicity as the people oppressing you

  83. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You really have to give Unity credit for coming up with the most retarded monetization fee ever.

  84. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think you can contact Valve or GoG to remove your game from being redownloaded from their servers. Google did it with Flappy Bird.

  85. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They got a big one to reply
    https://twitter.com/MegaCrit/status/1702077576209207611

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the removed TOS

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ONE MILLION INSTALLS!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >They installed? Good

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rust - https://garry.net/posts/unity-can-get-fucked

      Among Us - https://twitter.com/InnerslothDevs/status/1701731398498013575

      Cult of the Lamb - https://twitter.com/cultofthelamb/status/1701715971663425897

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh god, they keep coming

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wow

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lol, how many games are affected by this?
        like 30%? 50%?

        Someone's doing the list here
        https://twitter.com/FuckedByUnity

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Let's not make the same mistake again, Rust 2 definitely won't be a Unity game.
        Destroyed

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >amogus devs
        >Stop it. Wtf?
        i hate them so much

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >We had 10 years to make our own engine and never did. I'm sure a lot of game companies are feeling the same today.

        WAH WAH WAH WAH
        Exactly you had 10 years

        >Let's not make the same mistake again, Rust 2 definitely won't be a Unity game.
        Garry is gonna crawl back to Gaben for Source 2 for Rust 2

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lol, how many games are affected by this?
      like 30%? 50%?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They say 10%, but it is clearly way more

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        100%

        Not all are going to have to pay the new fee, but everyone is affected by them trying to retroactively change their terms of service.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unity is fucking everywhere, it makes up like 70% of all steam releases
        https://steamdb.info/tech/
        It's also over 80% of mobile releases. This is the biggest catastrophe in gaming development in a long time. They either revert this, or game dev (especially indie) is going to go through a massive upheaval and reorganization. Godot needs to pull as much funding as they can and finally get proper console and mobile support, they are standing to gain the biggest influx of users imaginable.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >RPG maker 2661
            >Godot 898
            The weak should fear the strong.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              honestly surprised by that one considering how much I see Godot praised

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Really? By now you should realize that the smaller the tech footprint the yappier the devs are, like with dogs.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Godot is like GIMP. It's a very cultist heavy, over praised, overhyped open sores alternative to much, MUCH better software and it's nowhere near as good as any of them no matter how hard the shills try and pretend otherwise.

                However, I do think Godot also has potential to overcome that, but they have fuck all funding and seriously need to solve that problem. They need to get their engine into a few big hype games that can result in a Blender style funding scheme.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >However, I do think Godot also has potential to overcome that,
                just like every other open source project

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Rpg maker is much more older than godot. Surprised how no one thought about the obvious.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >RPGMaker going to have a resurgence again.
            Finally, the return of cringe kino.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      even fucking among us

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the... FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      instead of making a statement just ditch the engine you cucks

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if the statement in any way helped convince unity to rollback the policy changes, it would save them a lot of time and money

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Instead of trying to turn the tide at the cost of writing some words, just completely redo your game, retrain employees and pivot so hard that it costs you potentially millions
        Be quiet while adults are talking

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rust - https://garry.net/posts/unity-can-get-fucked

      Among Us - https://twitter.com/InnerslothDevs/status/1701731398498013575

      Cult of the Lamb - https://twitter.com/cultofthelamb/status/1701715971663425897

      Wizards of the Coast had their sycophants when they tried to retroactively change the D&D Open Gaming License earlier in the year. But this change seems unilaterally hated. Even the Unity community is telling people to ditch Unity. Nobody is supporting this; at best there are people saying they won't change only because they've sunk too much into existing development.

      It's apocalyptic levels of shooting yourself in the foot.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This isn't just shooting yourself in the foot this is just completely annihilating the leg

  86. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You think we're gonna see Unity cracks in the future?

  87. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thats capitalism in action, i thought you guys liked capitalism

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      please have a nice day

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        oh right, you rather stick your head in the sand than have any self reflection about how this what you actively defend

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Hurrr muh capitalism
          Drink bleach if you can't see the difference between excessive garden gnome behaviour and normal working capitalism

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            its the same picture

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              go starve to death in a romanian ditch you worthless piece of shit

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >trying to reason with retarded commies

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Few notice that the phrase "capitalist" was popularized by none other than that bloody old garden gnome, Marx, himself -a ship-wrecker. (Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital). Until Marx told our kind of people they were "capitalists" in his "Das Kapital," they never gave what they were doing economically such a formal name, but they did know what they believed in. It was NOT "capitalism." Capital was only a tool for our people in the process of production. Men like Henry Ford were not interested simply in getting money. Rather they were trying to do something - in Ford's case, give all Americans an automobile via Ford's discovery of "mass production." The American economy does not produce miracles because it is "capitalist," but because it is enterprising and productive! The correct name of our system is not "capitalism," but "productive enterprise." Productive enterprise needs capital. But it also needs labor, material, management and a hundred other things. Capital is only one of the tools of a productive enterprise system. It took the gnomish parasitic genius of Karl Marx to elevate that one tool, capital, to the status in our civilization by attacking it and calling it "capitalism." He has thus trapped us into defending what he created, and has thereby doomed us to defeat because we defend a system based not on production, but money manipulation. Capitalism is the naked worship of money, not as a tool, but as an idol! "Capitalism" as promoted by both sides in the crazy "capitalism" versus "Communism" sham fight going on, is taken to mean the making of money through the use of capital - not necessarily by working or producing. In fact, most international capital is made not by working/or producing or even taking any genuine risks, but by manipulations of vast pools of money with inside information from garden gnomes in high positions.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It requires an insanely low IQ to attack property rights in the first place.

              Communism is nothing more than the supreme arrogance of bottom feeders

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Property rights and capitalism have nothing in common. The definition of capitalism is a system that allows the generation of capital using capital. Capitalism means usury, interest, insider trading, investors and every other nasty gnomish trick in the book. You were tricked into marrying those capitalist traits with good things like private property and private enterprise.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                private enterprise in industries that need high capital is pretty much impossible without investors
                you are retarded
                usury (or loans) make the economy more effective, maybe there should be laws to stop retards from destroying themselves with it but nothing wrong with the concept itself
                without usury or interest, there would be no loans, without loans people would not be able to buy houses or cars until they saved for them for years, but with loans they can use them right away

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >need high capital is pretty much impossible without investors
                Incorrect. It only seems that way because inflation and usury have blown everything out of proportion. In the same way you used to be able to buy a house or a car after a few months of working minimum wage, you could also afford to start a business after some time spent working yourself. You're letting a gnomish system of control and enslavement give itself job security.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how are you going to start something like a mine without investors?
                this would mean only big companies or already rich entities would be able to go into industries with high capital requirements
                this makes things much worse, not better

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Government loan with no interest. That's how every healthy country with a healthy economy did it throughout the entirety of human history.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so basically communism
                lmao

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, not at all. You don't understand the first thing about finance, do you?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I fail to see the problem. A static hierarchy prevents people from psychotically turning others into steppingstones in an attempt to move beyond their station.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thank god we will own nothing in the future then. Fuck the bankers and God bless lord vassal relationships!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you're really stupid. read a book dude. every single country in history that has ever banned usury has fucking skyrocketed in terms of production and wealth.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ban wealth creation
                I don't need to study history to know that you're a fucking retard. An incentive to share capital is GOOD.

                Also, what you're saying? Not even true. It caused stagnation in the middle ages and has kneecapped the middle east to this day.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                oh my god you are the dumbest person on the planet or you're an actual garden gnome.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You should move to Africa to live with people that share your values.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You should move to Israel. Oh wait, you're going to do that anyway when you get caught bloodletting children.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a fucking garden gnome you rabid idiot.
                Your seething when I point out basic economic principles is embarrassing. You posting all this natsoc shit when Hitler built his economy on deficit spending is so fucking retarded it makes my head spin.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"...all this natsoc shit when Hitler..."

                garden gnome detected.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks for playing moron. I accept your concession.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                at this point 4chan people just project whatever values they believe in onto hitler. the actual ideology doesn't matter anymore

                Debate me you cowardly merchants. Why is feudalism any worse than what we have now?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're the one ignoring all of my points. Instead you samefag me with a bunch of 60IQ anti-banking shit, which coincidentally is all from the 1700s because that was the last time anyone could in good faith ignore the mountain of evidence that banking contributes to economic growth.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not the guy you were talking to. I just called you a merchant for comedic effect. But my question was actually sincere.

                What's the worst thing that could happen if went back to feudalism but with modern technology?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Totalitarian governments have been failing hard in the 21st century, by my reckoning.
                They are paper tigers that have more and more corruption over time. You only need to examine the war in Ukraine, or the night light satellite analyses of Chinese GDP that show their economy is 25-40% smaller than they say, to arrive at that conclusion.

                Fundamentally, I believe it just leads to corruption and inefficiency. Appointing officials by private means, then threatening them with harsh consequences if they don't deliver perfect results.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you for the well thought out response tbh.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                wtf are you talking about. what does that have to do with my post

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He's one of those retards that thinks feudalism was some kind of idyllic perfect system because he's a fucking loser that will never own anything or amount to anything so he wants 99% of society to be reduced to his level as illiterate peasants. It's the only way he'll ever feel secure.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't want to go to bat for feudalism but peasants were treated better than modern workers are. At least the king had to live in fear of peasant revolts so they were treated well with lots of holidays.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know. half of that was a shit post the other half was a question because with age demographics it seems like the regression to it is probably inevitable.

                He's one of those retards that thinks feudalism was some kind of idyllic perfect system because he's a fucking loser that will never own anything or amount to anything so he wants 99% of society to be reduced to his level as illiterate peasants. It's the only way he'll ever feel secure.

                Someone's projecting.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                at this point 4chan people just project whatever values they believe in onto hitler. the actual ideology doesn't matter anymore

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >deficit spending
                Print 100 dollars.
                "I want a surplus!"
                Try to tax 110 dollars.
                So a problem?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The founding fathers were national socialists?

                You do need to study history. Badly. You have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you're not a garden gnome then you're incredibly stupid. You're defending an unsustainable system of gnomish slavery because garden gnomes told you it was for your own good. In reality money needs to be backed by labor or silver, it can't be backed by debt. Usury lets parasites generate money off of having money, which is inherently bad for society. You should only be making money if you're doing something useful for society. And that's before we even get into the fractional reserve principle, which blows your usury bullshit wide open.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                someone should've told hitler that, maybe germany wouldn't have needed to invade other countries to deal with debts

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you know anything about history? Hitler saved the German economy from crippling debt and inflation.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                where did you learn about history

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's well known Hilter saved the German economy after it was ravaged by the treaty of versailles. The absolute state of the weimar republic versus the economic turn around Hilter brought was nothing short of a miracle. There isn't a historian on the planet that would even contest that. Where did you learn history? Holocaust class?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                theres so much wrong with what you said but i know its not worth arguing with you since you are indubitably beyond reason

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Everything he said is objectively correct. You're just a seething moron.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're retarded.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                literally every person on the planet agrees that Weimar was being ravaged by inflation and that Hitler brought prosperity back to the German economy. whether you love or hate Germany, this fact isn't up for debate.

                stuff like this makes me think death drive is real

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's well known that if somebody on 4chan tells you something then it's true. why would someone on the internet just lie that doesn't make any sense

                literally every person on the planet agrees that Weimar was being ravaged by inflation and that Hitler brought prosperity back to the German economy. whether you love or hate Germany, this fact isn't up for debate.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                This isn't even a 4chan thing. I'm sure even the most pozzed history textbook in existence would admit it. It's basic fact that isn't even disputed. Don't know why you're seething so much about it.

                there's so much written about how fucked the german economy was. it was a giant ponzi scheme that involved bullying poor shitholes into unfair trade deals and started collapsing before they decided to just invade poland and hope that would solve their problems

                I've never been to 4chan. Finance is where my education is. I've also read The Creature from Jekyll Island, On the Abolition of Interest Slavery and dozens of others. Maybe you'd look less stupid if you took arguments by their own merits instead of rejecting them before you've even heard them because they don't agree with the propaganda you've been told your entire life about how great usury is.

                browsing 4chan does not count as education

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >shitgremlin can only argue in bad faith
                wow what a surprise

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You've never read a history book in your life, have you?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                again there's so much written about the nazi economy that you have to be willfully ignorant to think that it was a prosperous utopia and not on the verge of collapse

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's well known Hilter saved the German economy after it was ravaged by the treaty of versailles. The absolute state of the weimar republic versus the economic turn around Hilter brought was nothing short of a miracle. There isn't a historian on the planet that would even contest that. Where did you learn history? Holocaust class?

                Hitler "saved" Germany from Weimar economy run by Mises and Dollfuss, by raising work hours, cutting wages, and unsustainably turning Germany's economy on loans, foreign wars, and the destruction of their and European industry in general. Nazi economics failed even harder than Communism did.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's well known that if somebody on 4chan tells you something then it's true. why would someone on the internet just lie that doesn't make any sense

                This isn't even a 4chan thing. I'm sure even the most pozzed history textbook in existence would admit it. It's basic fact that isn't even disputed. Don't know why you're seething so much about it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's well known that if somebody on 4chan tells you something then it's true. why would someone on the internet just lie that doesn't make any sense

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hitler privatized the entire economy, and privatized the 4 biggest banks. This is not the win for your argument that you think it is.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                m8 are you mentally damaged? the whole thing started because of garden gnomes running german economy to the ground

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the nazi economy was perfect, why would 4chan ever lie to me?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Germany's economy was the most prosperous in the world before the war. Even the Allies admit this, they say outright that it was their main motivation for attacking Germany.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, their main motivation for attacking Germany was that they kept invading their neighbours. Fuck you hunnic pig.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Germany never invaded any country that wasn't already attacking them. Are you seriously taking post hoc propaganda as fact?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >germany dindu nuffin

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                is this a screencap of a random page of a book that you saved from 4chan?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's from A History of Central Banking. Read it if you want to stop being a dumb retard.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol i see that book posted all the time by 4chan gays, you only read it because they told you to and there is a 100% chance you've never read anything else on the nazi economy

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I've never been to 4chan. Finance is where my education is. I've also read The Creature from Jekyll Island, On the Abolition of Interest Slavery and dozens of others. Maybe you'd look less stupid if you took arguments by their own merits instead of rejecting them before you've even heard them because they don't agree with the propaganda you've been told your entire life about how great usury is.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Damn this bro hitting these brainwashed lefturds with hard truth bombs.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's amazing how quickly you had to move the goalposts from business loans to national currencies, because fundamentally you know that you are wrong. Really really wrong, and stupid really for hurling so many insults when "usury" is obviously a great incentive for the private sector.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't move any goalposts. You're just wrong and looking for a way to weasel out. Truly pathetic and gnomish behavior.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You do need to study history. Badly. You have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Name one reason feudalism is bad.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're really, really stupid and extremely wrong.

                You'd need to read several books to stop being such a fucking dumbass, but this video is the brief version.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Money is supposed to be a representation of labor. The end result of usury is an exponential wealth disparity in which those with money will amass unending amounts of wealth by using money to breed more money and effectively making slaves out of everyone else.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He's right, you're just a gullible retard who believes blatant propaganda. Usury is bad for every nation that allows it. It creates a parasitic class that siphons wealth away from the country. It doesn't generate wealth, it destroys it by building debt upon debt until the currency is meaningless.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Also, what you're saying? Not even true. It caused stagnation in the middle ages
                I can't believe Rabbi Heebergstein not being able to charge a very modest 5% interest compounded every Sabbath per shekel lent hamstrung middle age Europe. Oh wait, it fucking didn't; that was the epidemic that killed 1/4 of the continent's population which led to a gigantic labor shortage and drastic slowdown of production.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >private enterpise in industries that need lots of money is pretty much impossible without people that have access to lots of money
                >defends garden gnome bottomfeeders profiting by giving people money temporarily on the promise they pay the amount + tip as though it's some sacred instituition to keep the world spinning
                >doesn't understand that goods are priced based upon the value of a currency and currency is valued based upon the amount in circulation and its liquidity and people's trust in its stability
                You have as much financial literacy as the average Ganker poster. I can't believe no one lived in a house until capitalism was invented.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >wall of text

                the right can't meme

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Had me a sensible chuckle even if the intentional linebreaks is a shameless attempt to farm (You)s off of "hurr reddit spacing" replies

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No one likes a greedy company you gay.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thats the entire point of capitalism, be a greedy company or get beaten out by greedier competitors. at least that pesky big government isnt preventing this with consumer laws.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no you dumb moron, the point is to offer a service for a price that is better than the competition
          this is the exact opposite of that and their retarded business decisions means their company will go bankrupt
          i.e. this is a example of capitalism working as intended, dumbass decisions result in shit companies getting deleted (outcompeted) by market forces

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ever notice how rent is going up everywhere but wages arent. huh. you'd think rents would go lower because they want to be offer the best deal. or food prices would go lower to be better than the competition. maybe you dont know what capitalism is when done in america. Do you think Unity would have done this if they didn't think they could get away with it?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              they aren't going to get away with it, devs are ditching unity
              inflation is unrelated to capitalism retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                inflation is caused by corporations just charging more because fuck you, you'll pay it

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a report from the Kansas City Fed found that nearly 60% of inflation in 2021 was because of corporate profits.

                https://www.npr.org/2023/05/19/1177180972/economists-are-reconsidering-how-much-corporate-profits-drive-inflation

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                inflation is a spiral
                please god think harder before you post you stupid fucking communist

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                (Jou)

                retard

                (Jou)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                please god think harder about how corporations are posting all time profits after raising prices and saying it was because of inflation. If they were just offsetting the cost of production, their profits would have been the same.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the link you posted said they raised them in anticipation of even higher costs in the future, which actually happened
                and they want to keep the same margins (percentage of profits), not absolute profit you retard
                so you would expect 50% from profits and 50% from other sources basically, what you posted was 60% from profits due to anticipation of more cost increases
                but even framing it in this way is absolutely retarded

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In 2022, Big Oil companies reported record profits of $219 billion.
                This was more than the economic output of most countries.
                The profits were due to a combination of strong markets, production, and cost control.
                The companies used their earnings to reward shareholders with higher dividends and share buybacks.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm actually more confused how so many places can't hire people to work. Even my work is understaffed looking for people.
              How is anyone surviving without a job? Is it all welfare people?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                living with friends/family with jobs and scraping by with odd jobs and savings

                everyone needs more workers, nobody wants to actually hire the people looking for work; welcome to the economy run by women

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >understaffed looking for people
                Then you are offering shit wages and/or turning away applicants. It's not difficult to understand.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Basically every company always has non-existant openings listed nowadays. First of all it makes them look like they're growing which is mandatory for our garden gnomed system. Second, if a particularly good applicant comes along they can replace their least favorite employee.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Unironically yes because it is difficult to get a decent paying job iob any job at all. If a place is understaffed and are refusing applications theres not much you can do.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Let me guess, they tell you there's just nobody worth hiring and then make you work longer hours?

                How long are you going to go through life without thinking critically? Dumb fuck

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I can't work longer hours because its a union job.
                They'll have to pay me extra.
                Also, its a School job and it wouldn't make sense.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In China they hire 30 people to do the job of 1 person. In America they hire 1 person to do the job of 3 people, while promising him they'll hire more people soon so they won't be so short handed. After 2 years of this he eventually realizes they're not actually looking to hire more people and quits, so they hire a new guy to do the work of 3 people...

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This seems like a extremely risky strat considering how easy it is too lose half of your employees in less then a few days. Hell, some people just walk out on the first day.
                I don't think Walmart can be run by a single employee, they'll lose far more money than just hiring more people.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because they know people are so desperate that they'll keep working to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table especially in the current economic climate, and then run them ragged so they don't have the energy or will to find another job.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They have no shortage of applications, anon. They could hire up to full capacity in a week if they wanted to. But they don't. Hiring people is expensive, employees are easily the highest cost to any business. So you reduce headcount and increase workload while keeping pay the same.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There is no shortage of people willing to work. None. This "shortage" you've heard about doesn't mean what you think it means. It means that the number of spare applications they have on hand to fill positions when people quit unexpectedly has dropped below the safe threshold and they might actually have to start raising wages or offering better benefits to encourage people to apply.

  88. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This fixes and clarifies absolutely nothing and the fact they're still trying to go through with it means it's truly over.
    They could easily just charge that 20 cents on purchases instead and have it be far clearer and make more money off the games that never end up getting installed. The fact they're trying to stick with installs means they want to keep the ability dip in for that 20 cents as many times as possible.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >and the fact they're still trying to go through with it means it's truly over.
      Yeah I initially thought this was one of those "Overdo and roll back for praise" situations where you want to make an unpopular change, so you make a MASSIVELY unpopular one, then play the good guy and say "We listened, we love you, we're rolling it back a bunch" and roll back to your originally intended plan except now people love you for it.

      But nope, this looks pretty final. Unity lost $921,000,000 last year, the investors are done, they want money.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The beginning of the end was 2020 when it had its IPO.
        Wall Street is a fucking cancer to this world. FUCK investor cockroaches

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >and roll back to your originally intended plan except now people love you for it
        I mean people are forgetting about the other bullshit they're pulling. They're going always online now and killing their middleground option to force people into the highest tier. I thought they might roll back the install thing to get away with stuff like the above, but it really does look like they want the whole shebang.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Unity lost $921,000,000 last year, the investors are done, they want money.
        Maybe Unity shouldn't have 7700 employees. They literally have more employees than some of these examples:

        Nexon (7467)
        Nintendo (7317)
        Square Enix (4712)
        Blizzard (4700)
        Playstation (4000)
        Epic Games (3746)
        Capcom (3207)
        Roblox (2128)
        Valve (1139)

  89. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just give it to me straight. Is this legal? Yes or no?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes but actually no.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      anything is legal if you're gnomish and/or rich
      so yes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No you cannot charge a developer on a subscription model for an already released product based on ToS they never agreed to when the product was released.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a clusterfuck. The second that Unity tries to send to a bill to anybody who has ties to a bigger company then Unity is going to get sued into the ground.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The second that Unity tries to send to a bill to anybody who has ties to a bigger company then Unity is going to get sued into the ground.
        I'd love to be a fly on the wall if they tried this shit with one of Microsofts IPs.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It likely will be Microsoft. The only other players big enough to get seriously pissed and get legal if their studios get sent a bill are Mihoyo and Nintendo. Mihoyo will probably not be charged this fee, they have a special sweetheart deal where they pay boatloads of cash for a license that's above even Enterprise, they get full source code access to the engine and editor and use a heavily customized version on their end. Unity will likely play it smart and simply consider their license fee all the payment needed and not charge the install fee.

          Not sure about Nintendo's relationship with them

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's quasi-legal. In that it's not explicitly against any laws, but there's no judge anywhere on earth that would side with Unity if they were taken to court over it, because pulling the rug out from under people who went into business with you in good faith is something literally nobody likes.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And this is the reason why corpos push to resolve these cases through arbitration.

  90. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    really bro

  91. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >OH MEIN FAUCI I HAVE TO CHARGE 12 CENTS MORE GAMING HAS FALLEN

  92. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how do they count installs without phoning home? do they mean mobile store installs? are they retarded?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you're not legally allowed to question the holocaust or this

  93. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    let's say you install a game on a VM. And then you reset your VM to an earlier snapshot and install the game again. Is there any way for the game to know it has been installed before on that device?
    And they can't be using IP addresses, since this is mainly intended to detect people installing a game on multiple devices in their home which would all be on the same local area network.

  94. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >it only affects the guys that can turn tail and ditch us as fast as possible
    sure bud
    >we're not going to charge for fraudulent charges
    how will they prove what's faud and what isn't, literally just Trust me bro
    >we're not going to count web and streaming towards your count
    didn't they fucking say it they where going to be charging the fucking hosts?

  95. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no response from Kerbal devs
    sus

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      didnt that game bomb?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        KSP2 did, but 1 no

  96. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thread theme

  97. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just a reminder

    >The latest new Fire emblem game is running on Unity, where the IP is owned by Nintendo
    >F/GO is on unity, who's owned by aniplex. who's owned by Sony
    >Genshin is miHoYo
    >A whole bunch of other popular mobile games on unity ran by big companies like, bamco, Capcom etc etc
    >Unity tries to charge them
    >Unity gets fucked in courts
    >Unity literally dies by greed

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity trying to nab on vidya industry super titans sure is going to be funny when one of them realize their bullshit and move their massive influences to completely destroy unity.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sony alone will flatten them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all the big boys have multiple games running on Unity. I really want see those gays go up against all of them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being the BattleBit devs right now

      bro Call of Duty mobile runs on Unity. Bobby is going to rail them lmao
      Also Escape from Tarkov is on Unity 🙁

  98. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >always
    Waiting on Trump president any day now.
    Waiting for 3 billion people to die from the vaxx any day now

  99. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unity is going to have every blood sucking lawyer from any major studio using unity shoving their fetid cocks in every hole the instant a bill hits any of them.

  100. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tinfoil hat time
    This is a coordinated ploy to kill indie developers because gaming is one of the biggest cultural threats atm; over the course of the next decades the people in charge really want to push gaming to be exclusively through Microsoft Sony etc so they can have more control over the content. Games such as ex Genshin are a threat with pretty girls

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      MS, Sony, NIntendo, Capcom, Bandai, Konami, Square Enix, EA and many other power houses have games made on unity under them. fucking retard

  101. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Even if Unity were to fully back off they did an insane amount of damage to the brand. No one is going to trust them after this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I fully expect tons of major unity games to be announcing plans to go to a new engine in the future and for unity adoption to drop off a cliff. All you need is one scare like this to completely destroy faith in your company.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How hard would it be for epic to port fall guys over to unreal?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sure they could throw one of their Fortnite teams on it for a couple weeks and get it ported.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty hard, but Epic would probably win a lawsuit as long as they don't allow Tim Sweeny to open his dumb fucking mouth.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Unreal is C++
          Unity is C#
          I heard C++ is meme hard language

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm an idiot and I was able to learn C++

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C++ can be hard because you can do the same task in 200 different ways, this freedom comes at the cost of the language not holding your hand, still doesn't mean you should make simple things complicated, that's the biggest problem with anti-C++ fags(and modern "programmers" in general) they think because you can you should make things unnecessarily complicated.

            tldr C++ is as complicated as you want it to be.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          two ways about it, depending on the nature of your game:

          >high reliance on the actual codebase, only use unity for asset management and rendering
          might as well go monogame. not a huge deal, though incredibly annoying and wasteful nonetheless
          >high reliance on proprietary unity stuff like scenes, gameobjects, etc.
          you are a lot more fucked. but if you have less code to work with, then it's easier to port all your assets into something like unreal and more or less rebuild the game from ground up.

  102. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So they're literally confirming Unity is botnet?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unity games have had telemetry forever. This is just the first time they're using it maliciously.

  103. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being the BattleBit devs right now

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh fuck that is unity too, fuck

  104. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >start charity
    >attach game to charity
    >make $30 the only donation option
    >no unity fees

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But what do you do with the money so that it is considered a valid charity?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Provide rent and living expenses to needy game devs who reside at my current address.

  105. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >more than 90%
    That sounds like it'll affect every Unity game you've ever heard of. What percentage of Unity releases are asset flip garbage that nobody buys? Probably above 99%

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Steam alone has like 40,000 unity games on it and I'm betting nobody's heard of 99% of those.

  106. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i cant fucking believe they changed twitter to not let me read responses without an account. sick shit really

  107. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What about EU privacy laws? They'd basically be datamining people's devices for serial numbers and other identifying factors.

  108. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They think they won't get sued when this happens:

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ganker cracked the problem in less then 24 hours and now anyone can botnet a unity dev into being homeless

      you crazy bastards are amazing.

  109. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    welp, this seems like the right thread to post this, so I'll just go ahead and risk that ban

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        huh? I don't really know much about the communist takeover in russia, is this before or after the royals get massacred?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Before. The people who massacred the royals were all American garden gnomes sent there by American banks.

          They were sent because the Russian leadership didn't want to let international banks print and control their currency.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The highlighted text is written by a guy at The Washington Observer, you can see its label at the top. It's not a CIA publication. The reason you can find it in the CIA reading room is because it falls in the CREST program, which is an archive for historical writings and newspapers entries. It is very obviously saved there because the article itself is about an agent who got killed in Greece, in addition to Watergate's leak.

  110. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no mentioning how they will register installs
    >no word on telemetry
    >no statement how any of it is GDPR compliant
    At this point I am convinced they plan to cash in with information brokering selling off the collected fingerprints to however pays for them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what rubs me poorly. Likely never going to play or install another unity game again.

  111. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They went full garden gnometard. You never go full garden gnometard.

  112. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Question. Why cant they just to a Royalty cut like nearly every other game engine out there? Doing it based on purchases by the game itself and other aspects such as microtransactions is much more tangible than just straight up "we are guessing installs".

    It shouldnt be that hard cause thats the god damn norm

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because they want to kill indies. AAAs will be fine and can negotiate a better deal behind closed doors.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It feels like a calculated move to destroy the company by the corporate raider executives.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because they need money, badly. Unity has existed for 18 years, in that time they had ONE QUARTER where they turned a profit. Under John Riccitello Unity went from ~50 million lost per year to 971 million in 2022. The investors are fuming, they want money and they want it now.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But why didn't they just increase the price on their existing monetization methods instead of full going retard. Would've been 200% less controversial to just say "yeah, we're making your subscription more expensive."

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They are throwing a hail mary. Their company was likely going down the shitter anyway, so they might as well try something radical and hope that it somehow works out.

  113. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Calling it now, Google will buy Unity when its value tanks to shit and they'll open source it to try and fix its reputation, while also shoving adSense and other tracking crap inside. Save this post.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >google

      oh noes

      https://killedbygoogle.com/

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Google
      fuck no, at this point I'd rather Microgarden gnome bought it, at least it'd last a few years longer before being shut down.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        On the plus side if they abandon it hopefully some community/org will fork the code and continue it.

  114. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Fraudulent install chargers: we will work with you in suspected cases
    What will happen here is that they will initially charge the developer for any fees until the charge is finished being disputed like with credit cards. Furthermore, they will handle these in batch’s, they will in no situation wipe more than the cost of the subscription in a single batch. They will not hire the appropriate amount of staff for this, there will be a backlog immediately. There will be developers not being targeted by false installs wanting to dispute charges. Unity will receive charge backs and charging by companies who didn’t agree with disputes. This will need huge overhead for new staff to deal with these issues, they will need more lawyers.

  115. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What if all this shit is basically AI decision.

  116. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  117. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oy vey

  118. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't like it? Build your own engine. It's a free country and a free market. You agreed to the Terms of Service.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > Build your own engine
      That's unironically what we're going to see happen. Microsoft has the resources to build a new engine but they also have 2 trillion dollars in market cap, so they can literally just buy Unity without even waiting for their stock to implode.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You agreed to the Terms of Service
      Except that this new change voids any previous contract and ToS.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >By agreeing to these Terms of Service, you agree to all future Terms of Service no matter what changes we make.

        Shoulda read the fine print gay!

  119. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Open thread
    >Check replies
    >Instant goatse'd
    T-thanks

  120. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So that's it for my WEGs huh.

  121. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's insane that this applies to games that have already been released for years under a different ToS. It's scummy either way, but it would at least be somewhat more sensible if it only applied to new games going forward. This feels crazy illegal, but presumably their legal team actually approved it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      charging for installs is just fucking stupid, there is no reasonable way to track that without being insanely invasive
      and even then, not sure how you would actually track if someone installs it multiple times

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're so hungry for that Genshin money that they went full retard

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        China will make sure the garden gnomes working at Unity China will revert the changes unless they want to get their body organs stolen

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is on the Unity forum from their own lawyers:
      >Our terms of service provide that Unity may add or change fees at any time. We are providing more than three months advance notice of the Unity Runtime Fee before it goes into effect. Consent is not required for additional fees to take effect, and the only version of our terms is the most current version; you simply cannot choose to comply with a prior version. Further, our terms are governed by California law, notwithstanding the country of the customer.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But can't you just stick with an older version of Unity that was licensed under different terms? Pretty sure that's how software has traditionally worked.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's what the old version of the terms said you could do if you didn't agree with the new terms. But then they removed that from the latest terms and now say you have to use the latest.

          They're doing the exact thing they said they wouldn't do in the previous version of the ToS.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Further, our terms are governed by California law, notwithstanding the country of the customer.
        Are they fucking retarded? They think that they can force any Unity dev anywhere in the world to have to follow California law? Do they have lawyers from Wish.com?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This whole line sucks. Regardless of ToS changes you have to consent to it regardless. Forcing compliance on a new ToS without the knowledge or approval is illegal as fuck.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Consent is not required for additional fees to take effect
        Pretty sure this is EXTREMELY illegal in most first world countries.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It violates the basic principle of a market economy. It will never, ever hold up unless they bribe a fucking judge

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            m8 the people doing this run the game, they'll change rules when they feel like it

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Hello judge, I am a developer from EU and by EU laws, this is highly illegal in every regard
              >Okay, you are right. Unity you are in the wrong
              This is how it will go.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Consent is not required for additional fees to take effect
        Even someone with downs could win a court case against Unity by citing this line. What a fucking asinine thing to put into writing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It is absolutely illegal and will never hold up
      Breaking the law isn't allowed just because you made someone sign a contract

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but presumably their legal team actually approved it?
      I doubt it. This entire thing smells like some CEO or another bigwig is just going nuts and throwing a bunch of shit around completely cluelessly. Look how fast they had a "regroup" and changed it from being every install or just being every initial install instead, and that demos and game pass were also not gonna be included.

      They haven't cleared fuck all with any kind of lawyers, I'm 99% sure.

  122. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

  123. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i actually can't believe how retarded they are, what a fucking shame. huge fucking disaster for no reason

  124. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AHHHH HELP ME OBAMA THEY'RE DOING HECKIN INSIDER TRADING!
    >NO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS BUT I SAW IT ON R/OCCUPYWALLSTREET

    Shut the fuck up gays. All public company executives get compensated in stock/options and have policies in place to occasionally sell some every year. John Riccitello sold 2,000 of his 3.2 million shares last week, that's not insider trading your fucking morons. The other people some a few thousand of their millions too.

    >NOOO STOP THE COUNT JOOS JOOS JOOS

  125. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Piratecucks truly and unironically thought they could bankrupt companies by uninstalling and reinstalling their cracked games.
    >captcha: ASS 44N

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so you say but piracy is alive and well
      surely this time the multibillion dollar enterprises who hire jeet subhumans to make their products will manage to win the arms race against the pirate master race

  126. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is Ganker turning back towards being leftwing? Or are you guys just going to blame DA garden gnomeS for conducting business totally legally within the current business law framework established by Republicans?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >its legal goy, dont worry about it

  127. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well people can defend the garden gnomery all the want but I'm going to vote with my wallet.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >vote with my wallet by sending a strongly worded letter about uninstalling a free game

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm wasn't a free player 🙂

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it wont affect genshin impact at all anon.
      genshin is owned by mihoyo which is part owner of unity china.

  128. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we're all moving our games out of unity

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      gamers != game developers

  129. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We reserve the right to change this at and time, specifically on January 1st 2024 😉

  130. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Someone please lie to me and say that some rich dev's lawyers are getting ready to kick Unity's shit in.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're going to vote with your wallet. You're going to uninstall every Unity game that you own. You're going to refuse to purchase any further games on steam/whatever until they completely disallow unity engine games.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ??? This doesn't affect consumers at all you dunce. We're not the ones being hit with fees, the developers are. There's no way to "vote with your wallet".

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          (Jou)

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >publishers won't make sweeping changes to their monetary structure to compensate for these charges
          >it won't affect consumers!
          lol
          lmao even

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Correct, they won't, because none of them will pay any of these fees, which are either totally unenforceable or totally illegal, or both.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >it's unenforceable!
              >it's illegal!
              >ITS NOT HAPPENING
              you haven't even passed the denial phase yet, huh?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What kind of argument is this even supposed to be?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, consider that Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo all directly or indirectly own big games made with unity. FGO is Unity, so is Genshin, Fire Emblem, most of the big gacha games. Imagine Unity tryign to send a bill to Sony or Microsoft.

  131. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Just trust us, we'll only charge you when it's fair for us to do so

    There is no way to enforce a model you refuse to specifically define, they are making this up as they go along. This is an announcement of turning unity into an extortion racket.

  132. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    garden gnomes being bad has been debunked guys.

  133. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Trust us sir, I promise 500k people downloaded your game not 300k
    kek anybody buying this is going to get kwabbed

  134. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so how long have unity games been tracking players?

  135. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Early access loses money now!

  136. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Steam now uninstalled too 🙂

  137. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unity just admitted to being Israeli spyware. This is a big deal. Now people will wonder if Unreal Engine has similar spyware capabilities.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Now people will wonder if Unreal Engine has similar spyware capabilities.
      Considering anyone with a free Epic account can get the UE4 and 5 source code, go ahead and point to where it is.

  138. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So is this basically just admitting they're targeting Freemium games like Genshin impact?

  139. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And what did we learn today, class?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That you can poison the well by randomly starting to discuss how German spergouts were really cool and justifiable

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We learned that 4chanmorons are too stupid to understand interest rates, which great powers have been using since even before the industrial revolution?

  140. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >/pol/fags discussing economics
    kek it's like seriously debating antivaxxfags
    everything is a gnomish conspiracy

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bud that's not the look you want. even fauci admits that those shots were dangerous now.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >even fauci admits that those shots were dangerous now.
        who are you trying to fool here lol

  141. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What I've learned from this thread is that Unity should have consulted Hitler before making this change

  142. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What I've learned from this thread is that leftists shouldn't have rights of any kind.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've learned that you are a retard.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        uh oh triggered lefturd~

        leftists:
        >capitalism bad!
        also leftists:
        >nooooooooooo usury is good don't take it away
        lmfao

        it do be like that the most useful idiots

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Sneed

  143. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    leftists:
    >capitalism bad!
    also leftists:
    >nooooooooooo usury is good don't take it away
    lmfao

  144. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Watching you desperately try to declare victory after being BTFO by basic economics is sad. I'm not left wing btw, and you knew that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if you were the idiot defending usury then you lost the argument.

  145. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What would happen to the world if Israel got nuked of the face of the Earth?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *