>we need to make games that require 1000W power supplies and $1500+ rigs because...

>we need to make games that require 1000W power supplies and $1500+ rigs because... we just have to, okay!!!!
when can we finally say the graphics are good enough and actually start focusing on the gameplay? minecraft is the best selling game of all time and has dogshit graphics, clearly they dont matter.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wrong board

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's much easier to do impressive graphics than impressive gameplay. The latter requires some originality and creativity

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is destructible environment graphics or gameplay? I would say both.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    But we actually don't, we make games for base hardware consoles and the 1# spot hardware on Steam survey. The biggest market segment.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Modded Skyrim will look and run better than the left image lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >run better
      Definitely not.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        hard to tell unreal is well made and runs well and gamebro or whatever dogshit the morons at bethesda rp as game engine devs use runs like shit but isn't demanding.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If we're talking about ENB, ReShade or their likes (the stuff that imparts the biggest graphical difference), then the game will run pretty poorly. That's where Unreal has the upper hand.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >look better and run better
      It won't and doesn't.

      That's not to say it doesn't look great, but the left is superior in a million different ways.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Under no circumstance.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bite me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      last I heard that game was still a buggy mess 2 years after release

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > Blurry background
      > Static water texture with some moving water that spazzes in and out of existence
      > Ground/Grass looks nothing like it should look
      I'm sorry, but that looks awful.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you tried

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what a fricking moron take
        >looks awful
        Black person why you always use superlatives this does not look awful at all. Man frick you contrarian Black person moron kys kys kys homosexual homosexual fricking Black person 60iq moron kid kys kys

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    minecraft sucks. It's fun for a week and then it's boring. We should always be pushing the boundaries of tech like we always have

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >gameplay deficiencies have to be fixed by muh graphics
      the absolute state of "gamers"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >we must always cuck ourselves out of new technology because of nostalgia glasses

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >illiterate homosexual cannot even comprehend the simplest of sentences
          take your meds, you're being delirious

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Contrary to your belief, game devs chasing graphic neglecting gameplay breakthrough for decade.
          I remember some anon posted old game that enemy react differently to where you shoot him.
          Yes we got better graphic but we lost the details. Games are more or less homogeneous now

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think that's just due to how video companies are ran today. Everyone just runs the clock and everything is on a strict deadline. Good graphics are taken for granted.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Is that a based quote of a based guy on a based image used by a based guy like yourself (based)?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Associate professor of culture and technology
        >stony brook

        lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i fricking hate minecraft i remember when it was shilled on Ganker for free

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's something seriously wrong with graphics development. Anyone else feels this way?

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >he plays games for the graphics and not the gameplay
    imagine being a AAA drone

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >when can we finally say the graphics are good enough and actually start focusing on the gameplay?
    When normies will finally understand that they shouldn't trust corporations, which push for maximum technical fidelity, while dumbing down everything else, because "muh casual/FIFA/CoD/gamejourno/whatever crowd"

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Very nice... Now show the characters moving 🙂

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    minecraft does not have dogshit graphics.
    cybertroony does

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Stop being poor and upgrade already. And my rig draws only about 700w at full load.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >rig
      kek, i used to say this too when i hade a plexi glass case

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >minecraft
    Is ridiculously demanding game. It freezes and stutters even on the most powerful rigs. At least without Sodium or OptiFine.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      its not tho its just a lot of the game work is single threaded and poorly optimized

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, it's amazing how much better Unreal5 engine looks.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i half agree
    backgrounds, buildings, scenery don't mean shit
    but the PEOPLE, the HUMANS, we're kinda there but there's room for improvement

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because an entire generation, hell several generations, were raised believing that muh grafix is the most important thing ever. This way game designers don't need to worry about gameplay or story or art direction or sound mixing and score or any of the other parts that make up a game. They just need to shit out more polygons and particle effects and their garbage will sell.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Except graphics obsession was more common from the 90s-mid 2000s, where games coming out just years apart felt like they belonged in a different dimension. Basically the uplift from a 2022 title, and something that came out on the 360 with decent art direction and optimization is marginal, imo less than the PS2-360 jump was.

      Nobody cares about graphics anymore, titles slip years and they still look current.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Right SOVL, left soulless

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i hate how left looks like a playtoy set but people still pretend it's more realistic

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah something about the lighting feels off to me. Get that from a lot of modern games.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Minecraft is bestselling sure, but so is candy crush.
    Minecraft can suck my fricking dick, gay.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >yoyo im moron dev
    >i put all these new effects at once
    >woow look how pretty SMEARED CUM BLOOM ASS FRICK
    BUT WHERE IS THE FRICKING GAMEPLAY!!!!!!¡

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    minecraft isnt a game, its more like a platform

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    (You) are not the target audience for games with fancy graphics OP, normalgays are. They think that good graphics = good game unironically, this is why The Last of Us 2 gets any kind of praise whatsoever.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    but Ganker hates minecraft

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Video games exist only to sell trailers to morons, everything else is secondary.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I need to watch streamers' reactions to trailers so I know which game to watch someone else play. fr fr

      If I can't see the faux-emotion in a stranger's face while they watch what is essentially a long-form advertisement I might have to actually start playing games to see what they're like, as if I'm some kind of cave man.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Plebians still don't understand that better technology and indeed graphics inherently helps gameplay and improve dev times

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They quite literally do not.
      Gameplay especially has been declining, with especially the AAA studios streamlining and cutting corners left and right. All while they waste more and more money each year, using several child-studios with up to hundreds of workers (+ plenty of outsourcing), just to meet the silly deadlines for their silliest rehash titles.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, good devs makes better and better games as technology improves. This is fact.
        Bad devs will always be terrible and yes maybe focusing on tech if you're a bad dev will exacerbate the problem. But the issue is the dev, not the tech.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I like your optimism, but as a boomer game-dev myself, my own experiences have been mostly opposite nowadays.

          All these automated, procedural and dynamic things have all but killed artistry of the industry. Any sort of hand-crafting is almost shunned now, resulting these games that might look and play like a Super Nintendo games, but require hardware stronger than Crysis 1's recommended specs to even run smooth.

          I'd say the very early 2010s provided the best balance of both worlds.
          Now we're reaching the point where especially zoom zoom devs just copy-paste pre-made scripts and outsource everything else.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            frick you not having to put light probes and cubemaps on every square inch of the map manually or retopoing the same mesh dozens of times to fit some fricking arbitrary scene budget frees up developers to actually focus their time on shit that matters and isn't just mindless busywork

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Game's optimization does not matter
              >Art design does not matter

              >Artists and programmers are now the same people
              "okay", but no.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                it's funnier when you remember the game on the left ran on fricking Frostbite 3

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    left = souless, onions, reddit
    right = SOVL, EPIC, BASED, HITLER

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >someone bothered to do this
    >when you can do it in the fricking game with a new texture pack and ENB shaders

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's a video trend in which third worlders use the free 3d scans that come with ue5 to recreate levels from video games. These videos get millions of views because people are moronic and think an empty level that got put togheter in 2 days is somehow impressive.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this problem would be solved if PCs switched to ARM but that's never going to happen

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Souleless
    >Soule

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    UE5 is the worst case of pajeet bite tech demo. Yeah it's easy to make some good looking scene but as soon as you try making an actual game out of it, the engine shits and pisses itself.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *