The ironic part is that the main thing stopping them from unionizing is themselves. They’re either too incompetent, too petty and end up fricking each other over and trying to power grab, or they don’t want to because then they can’t play the role of perpetual victim constantly screaming for change.
Last game he worked on was in 2021, Dungeons and Dragons Dark Alliance. A game that is shit and he is mad about being shit even though a normal person would go "I did the concept art, not my problem"
Yeah I feel like a concept artist is the one person that should give the least amount of shit when a game gets criticized. Like unless people specifically criticize the art direction, which almost never happens, and even when it does a concept artist is a layer removed from it since ultimately someone else decides the final look of the game.
Wow. Someone who finally gets unions instead of steeping it in pointless communist rhetoric!
A union is an instrument to restrict the supply of labour so as to increase its market price. That's it. There is not "glorious revolution" behind it, just suppliers of labour doing business.
Step 1: Recruit majority of labour pool into an organisation. Unemployed members may be paid a pittance to convince them. The benefits should be obvious to employed members.
Step 2: Threaten to have every member of the organisation refuse to work if wages are not raised.
Step 3: If wages are not raised, make good on the threat.
Step 4: Don't stop making good on the threat until wages are raised.
Step 5: Don't start crying if you're fired.
Step 6: Do NOT under ANY circumstances enter the employer's property without their permission or prevent entry for other people. If you enter with permission, but the permission is later revoked, LEAVE. Failing here is a crime, and you will go to prison. I don't know why unions tend to fail here, but they do.
It is not that complicated.
Or if your country has government-protected unions, just petition for government-protected union status, declare a strike FOR A LEGAL REASON and conduct the strike IN A LEGAL FASHION.
If the law binding government-protected unions are too strict, DO NOT REGISTER FOR GOVERNMENT-PROTECTED UNION STATUS. ABUSING THE AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT-PROTECTED ORGANISATIONS WILL RESULT IN YOU PERSONALLY GETTING FRICKED IN THE ASS BY THE GOVERNMENT.
I'm a lawyer and I thought feminists were wrong until I worked with a female lawyer and her clients have absolutely no respect for her but they do for me. We have the same experience and give the same advice but no one wants to hear it from her. Or course, probably different because I know in "gamedev" loads of these women do not have the same jobs as men.
Lawyering is something both men and women can do well, it's one of the few jobs where both sexes do genuinely have the capacity to do it and do it well.
I remember how during gamergate a bunch of videogame journalists got way more hate than most of the women involved, but were told to shut the frick up because they're a fricking white male lmao
This has to be a lie or a joke or a shop or something. cat piss smells so utterly vile I don't know how someone could breathe with such a huge amount of it so close to them. Source: Had an old largely incontinent cat.
>pissing for months >pissing to the point of clogging a drain >I haven't showered "in a while" >>that is ok
So much wrong in here and doesn't even scratch the surface >imagine the rest of the bathroom >imagine the rest of the house >imagine the conditions this person is live in >imagine even getting near someone that haven't showered in months >imagine even saying to a person in this state that is fine
I can't even start to phantom what fricked up childhood and life this person have. That trans flag might be the most normal thing here.
Knowing it's a troon, and given that shower space there is no house. That is a cart apartment, a small tight pact cart apartment, holding in human body odor, cooking, showering and cat piss smell in AND out of the litter box (assuming it even pisses in there anymore). It probably shits elsewhere that's not intended as well. The fact the shower is clogged and the moron hasn't used draino is the reddest flag, piss is still liquid.
>pissing to the point of clogging a drain
How would that even happen?
>How would that even happen? >The fact the shower is clogged and the moron hasn't used draino is the reddest flag, piss is still liquid.
This to me is the worst. How long is that cat pissing to even clog a fricking drain?
There must be full of hair or other shit in those pipes, I seriously hope it isn't just piss. It would probably take years to clog a pipe with piss.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Why would any amount of piss clog a pipe? Does cat piss solidify?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Given it's a troon, he probably shaved in the shower many times and just never properly drained it, plus cats and fur. So a cat routinely going in there is just as likely to leave fur as a troon shaving for months at a time. It's gross to think about but I am training to be a plumber and pet hair clogging is not as uncommon as you think. But I would charge extra for this, or decline it.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>and pet hair clogging is not as uncommon as you think. But I would charge extra for this, or decline it.
I believe you, any household with pets inside is filled with animal fur. Those pipes have enough cat fur and tron hair to make toupees for a whole monk monastery.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Yep, grooming salons are nuts with declog services.
How about you actually try to pay attention at the playtest instead of playing worse than an IGN journalist because you’re drunk and don’t give a shit?
Why do devs feel like they need to get special treatment? Nobody cares for the individual factory workers who built your car, or the mexicans who produce your lemons. Give people what they want and you get money.
Because they try to build parasocial communities and then get fricked by exposing themselves so much. The industrial workers that built your car didn't make a discord server for it or tweet about it.
Treating others with compassion is not being woke, also Ron DeSantis will never be president. You just need someone to care about you, Anon. I do. It isn't your fault.
What are you even speaking about and why did you assume I was a greasy mutt?
And on you're point, I can tell you a conservative cares more about people than any woketard, since woketards only care for the global population (aka no one), meanwhile conservatives care about their relatives and nearest countrymen, which will make them actually try to better their lives unlike the average woketard who hates everyone who's not a rich urbanite with all their guts.
>hey I noticed that the game directions say press X to jump, but when I press X the character shits his pants and apologizes for being white. can we get that fixed???
>"I THINK I KNOW A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT GAMES THAN YOU DO. ITS MY JOB AFTER ALL"
What sort of brainrot do you need to have to decide the best way to get people to respect you is to antagonize them?
Why does such brainrot seem to be spreading and becoming more common every month?
This depends on the context of the situation and the ownership status of the flute. Does child b still have it in her possession or has she sold it or given it away?
B literally said that she doesn't want it taken away from her, meaning she possesses it, since she made it. No one else has a right to it unless she gives it away.
4 months ago
Anonymous
No she says she made it, it neither implies ownership nor possession. The point I’m trying to get at that this moral dilemma is moronic as it skews towards one child (B) who I agree does deserve it compared to the other two options. But my grievance is that the situation is far too vague. (B) doesn’t focus on the ownership aspect but rather the labor and material aspect which can be skewed in the direction of saying that anyone that either provides resources for or makes a product or item is entitled to it despite the fact that that may not always be the case.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, if someone provides the materials or negotiates ownership beforehand then it changes things, but there's nothing in the question about that. If there was it would change the question.
4 months ago
Anonymous
But that’s the point, the question is being vague for the purpose of saying that labor and resources are all that matter in this situation and leaving out the specifics. It’s like saying that the factory worker is entitled to what is made in the factory because he put in the labor or the farmer is entitled to the a meal at a restaurant because he supplied the ingredients. There is a subtle message that leads the viewer to be bias in a certain direction while ignoring many important details.
4 months ago
Anonymous
The question is clearly about government redistribution so that stuff is irrelevant, which is why it's not part of the question. Within the given context, B is the clear owner.
The premise is flawed from the start because it's based on the idea that governments are meant to have control over citizens in the same way adults do over children. In this hypothetical it's B but the point it's trying to make is moot because the government should not have any part of this situation unless things get violent or B's property is stolen.
>Take the flute from B and give it to A because A can use it best >Days later B approaches you with a massive dildo she made >She insists you take it because you're the one who can use it best
Child C has nothing but there's still a possible future for him. He ought to start by learning how to make a flute rather than stealing one or learning how to play it.
Child B made the flute and owns the flute. She can now start learning how to play the flute.
Child A is a scumbag who is depending on others to prop her up. Rather than learning how to make a flute herself she'd rather have someone else make the flute and then steal it. Without Child B she is worthless and is showing absolutely no willingness to change.
Would it be losing some point of this to change it to a tool for improving the situation for everyone (We live in a society)?
Like A is an experienced builder, B just invented the hammer, and we all live in a house that needs fixing?
he didn't "invent" the hammer in this analogy, he made it himself and now he owns it
surely he would sell it if someone just asked him. Why should he give away his labor for free?
Give flute to C, he sell it to A and they are happy. C learns to work thank to that action and ask B for another flute, he wants money for it and C gives 2/3 of the money. Now A can consume in peace, B make products and C finally has a work.
If your enemies will hate you no matter how you temper or present your beliefs and actions, why not just do what they say you do? You can't win with them, why not just accelerate?
>If your enemies will hate you no matter how you temper or present your beliefs and actions, why not just do what they say you do? You can't win with them, why not just accelerate?
Because then you lose everyone else.
Think of it like this, 10% are hardcore Team A. 10% are hardcore team B. You're never going to convince those.
Then there's 20% team A, 20%team B. These are people who have taken one side and are committed to it, but if something extreme happens, you couldlose them.
Then there's 40% undecided, they might lean team A or B, but if that side does something they don't like, they'll shift over to the other team.
If you're team B, and you start acting like team A's strawman of you, you're going to lose all but that first 10%.
Those fence sitters were never actually fence sitters if they are so easily convinced by one person who is an extremist. They were just waiting to show their true colors.
4 months ago
Anonymous
In this case I took "you" to be representitive of individual actors within "your movement". It's not about one person from team B radicalizing, it's about team B collectively saying "frick it, you think we're fascist? let's just be fascist then"
4 months ago
Anonymous
I think we're splitting hairs and getting confused here. I want what you are describing to happen. I want politically strong beliefs to be the norm, and I want people to segregate themselves based on them.
4 months ago
Anonymous
1. There's a big difference between being convinced by one person radicallizing and recoiling at an entire party radicallizing.
2. So you're just using the other side's argument as an excuse to get other people to adopt your belief and not actually asking the question you initially posted?
If so, you're a disgusting sack of shit just as bad as those you fight.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I don't care about hypocrisy. I care about my side winning and having the most people.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Didn't accuse you of hypocrisy anon, just of being as disgusting as the commies and asked you to confirm you're not an honest actor.
You're not getting it. It's like trolling. They make you want to bite back, use the topic to pretend they didn't instigate it, and go "see this guy is an IRL strawman I'm the sane comic self insert".
[...]
Please stop posing these comics im pleading with you. They are so repulsive to look at I can't stand it anymore. I'm asking nicely please.
Post homestuck it will eat the image limit and salt the metaphorical earth.
Just accept my team knows better what’s good for you and put us in places of power, little chuddie, so we can make the world a better place, even for stupid fricking hicks like you.
Thanks.
This feels like typical out of touch god complex shit or whatever it’s called where a person thinks that because they’re at the forefront that somehow they’re an authority on something and can talk down to everyone about it. It’s like if a luggage attendant tries to smugly explain planes to an aircraft engineer.
most western devs didnt "decide to make it their jobs"
they failed to get jobs in other fields like movies, books, politics, etc so they settled with games
I work in gamedev
I can confirm the majority of people do not give a frick about games. At best they care about their discipline. It's quite disheartening to see how little passion they have for it
Legitimately all they want is political involvement and spreading their ideology, so why not just be a staffer for a political party they agree with? Probably pays the same as these low tier game dev jobs and it's actually what they want to do. I don't get it.
To be honest they're right in some way, they choose a really shit job with a horrible payment if you work for a company or a fricking gamble if you go indie, people that care about videogames would want in some point to do videogames but the job itself is just not worth it so they need to cope the mediocrity of the job with praises of the videogame "community" and nothing give you more praises lately than being woke.
So yeah, they would care more than us but it's not our fault that making a videogame nowday is such a shit job in so many aspect and it's not our fault to say that a game is shit and full of woke shit, this is just a chain reaction were no one won.
Well, they care enough to make a game they fill with their propaganda, they decide to ruin their own life with a shitty job and be walking clown for the sake of their game, so yeah, they care more than us, but that will not stop us to complain about them and we're totally justified because such game is just a piece of shit.
The question isn't "do they care" at this point, it's "what do they care about?" In the sutuation being argued over, it's not the video games. The video games are just the vehicle for what they really care about, the propaganda.
Yeah, if the payment is complete shit at least the unique thing they can care about is promoting the propaganda for these little praises in twitter and discord and the casual woke journalist articles saying that you're one of the goods ones.
you don't need justification to comment on a product, especially a paid one. the fact that they don't care about your opinion as a player, as well as >don't care if the game works >don't care if the game is good >don't care if the game is even a game really
means that they in fact do not care about video games as much as me.
But there come the problem, no one that actually care about videogame is dumb enough to work in one because they know that would be a really shitty decision and a waste of time, that's usually the main issue right now, working to make videogames it's not worth it and that lead to that people that make these videogames not worth it to play.
At least we can agree the real problem is how shitty is the risk of making a videogame or working for a videogame company, if the payment was better more competent people would get it but the job is so bad that there's no incentive to even get inside, leaving just these wokegays to be the only ones that apply for that shit job.
None of these untalented people will be fired and paying the rates that like, IT companies or security tech ones do for their talent would make video games cost even more. The future of video games is more and more and more money spent to make employees happy but they aren't happy
game devs sometimes care about video games, i'm saying that being a game dev doesn't inherently mean you care more about video games than players, especially these days.
you don't need justification to comment on a product, especially a paid one. the fact that they don't care about your opinion as a player, as well as >don't care if the game works >don't care if the game is good >don't care if the game is even a game really
means that they in fact do not care about video games as much as me.
>I didn't go to school for seven years and study law to take a job cutting hair for $20 an hour
I dunno man, it kinda sounds like that's exactly what you did.
>I didn't go to school for seven years and study law to take a job cutting hair for $20 an hour
I dunno man, it kinda sounds like that's exactly what you did.
AI does not understand law, it's just hallucinating shit. You are fricking yourself by relying on it.
Genuinely, what does this person thinks the VGAs are? It's advertising for games that already came out, games that will come out and products in between. The first ever VGA was not hosted to promote art, Madden 2004 was GOTY that year.
game developers want a paycheck and to put as much woke shit in games as possible. It's why we moved away from scores and fun things to do and moved toward sociopolitical propaganda
big sausage fingers
Perfect for prostate massages
my sandwich isn't gonna make itself, Lisa
Have you considered Twitter may be bad for your mental health?
did you get lost here?
>community manager
Shit game
This guy is a concept artist btw.
The ironic part is that the main thing stopping them from unionizing is themselves. They’re either too incompetent, too petty and end up fricking each other over and trying to power grab, or they don’t want to because then they can’t play the role of perpetual victim constantly screaming for change.
For them unionizing means instant raises and free shit. It doesn't mean protecting the labor force by dealing with bad actors.
He's also telling you not to like game devs
Last game he worked on was in 2021, Dungeons and Dragons Dark Alliance. A game that is shit and he is mad about being shit even though a normal person would go "I did the concept art, not my problem"
Yeah I feel like a concept artist is the one person that should give the least amount of shit when a game gets criticized. Like unless people specifically criticize the art direction, which almost never happens, and even when it does a concept artist is a layer removed from it since ultimately someone else decides the final look of the game.
thanks for reminding me of that piece of shit and the disappointment I felt when it wasnt a sequel to the diabloesque DA entries
Wow. Someone who finally gets unions instead of steeping it in pointless communist rhetoric!
A union is an instrument to restrict the supply of labour so as to increase its market price. That's it. There is not "glorious revolution" behind it, just suppliers of labour doing business.
>draws the black person as a hunched ape with brain dead look on its face
Uhh, the community manager better look at that.
Please stop posing these comics im pleading with you. They are so repulsive to look at I can't stand it anymore. I'm asking nicely please.
>This guy is a concept artist btw.
concept artists really do need to unionize and urgently or they will be the first to be replaced by AI.
>Concept artists unionize. Industry now has to push AI even harder or else they will have to deal with even more incompetence.
>noses
>mouths
>eyes & eyebrows
this dude read way too much foxtrot as a kid. also, holy frick that black woman is not drawn well
It's a standard French style. The kicking gag in this one is a major trope of this art style
2023 was an ok year for games. But I'm guessing he hates it because his gay friends got fired.
i wasn't aware that jim davis was french. another reason to hate him.
how do you unionize in a job where you are expendable and are constantly taking the fall so your superiors can make more money?
That sounds like the exact situation in which you should unionize.
Step 1: Recruit majority of labour pool into an organisation. Unemployed members may be paid a pittance to convince them. The benefits should be obvious to employed members.
Step 2: Threaten to have every member of the organisation refuse to work if wages are not raised.
Step 3: If wages are not raised, make good on the threat.
Step 4: Don't stop making good on the threat until wages are raised.
Step 5: Don't start crying if you're fired.
Step 6: Do NOT under ANY circumstances enter the employer's property without their permission or prevent entry for other people. If you enter with permission, but the permission is later revoked, LEAVE. Failing here is a crime, and you will go to prison. I don't know why unions tend to fail here, but they do.
It is not that complicated.
Or if your country has government-protected unions, just petition for government-protected union status, declare a strike FOR A LEGAL REASON and conduct the strike IN A LEGAL FASHION.
If the law binding government-protected unions are too strict, DO NOT REGISTER FOR GOVERNMENT-PROTECTED UNION STATUS. ABUSING THE AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT-PROTECTED ORGANISATIONS WILL RESULT IN YOU PERSONALLY GETTING FRICKED IN THE ASS BY THE GOVERNMENT.
IS THAT IS THAT ALEX YIIK YELLOW EDITION??????
ITS A FRICKING SHINY YIIK AHHHHH
His actual work is pretty good, dunno why he chooses to draw like ass
Bitch
>women colleagues
They're not going to frick you, bro
>HEY GUYS I'M A STR8 WHYT MAIL AND MY FEMALE AND POC COLLEAGUES HAVE IT WORSE THAN ME
how are these people still real
I'm a lawyer and I thought feminists were wrong until I worked with a female lawyer and her clients have absolutely no respect for her but they do for me. We have the same experience and give the same advice but no one wants to hear it from her. Or course, probably different because I know in "gamedev" loads of these women do not have the same jobs as men.
there is a biological reason for that, men and women are not equal
Lawyering is something both men and women can do well, it's one of the few jobs where both sexes do genuinely have the capacity to do it and do it well.
I remember how during gamergate a bunch of videogame journalists got way more hate than most of the women involved, but were told to shut the frick up because they're a fricking white male lmao
>Dont wanna be harassed? Stop release suckass games.
well?
YOU ARE TRASH!
Make shit games get shitted on, is not rocket science.
Women and men aren't an adjectives. Female and male can be.
Fricking "Women colleagues". Don't they hear how moronic it sounds?
>spends time making gay comics
>not making the games 'they make' better
mm...also this art looks like the art that child obsessed troony makes.
This has to be a lie or a joke or a shop or something. cat piss smells so utterly vile I don't know how someone could breathe with such a huge amount of it so close to them. Source: Had an old largely incontinent cat.
trannies live with pus coming out of their crotch 24/7
Leave my wife's hole goal alone.
>pissing for months
>pissing to the point of clogging a drain
>I haven't showered "in a while"
>>that is ok
So much wrong in here and doesn't even scratch the surface
>imagine the rest of the bathroom
>imagine the rest of the house
>imagine the conditions this person is live in
>imagine even getting near someone that haven't showered in months
>imagine even saying to a person in this state that is fine
I can't even start to phantom what fricked up childhood and life this person have. That trans flag might be the most normal thing here.
Knowing it's a troon, and given that shower space there is no house. That is a cart apartment, a small tight pact cart apartment, holding in human body odor, cooking, showering and cat piss smell in AND out of the litter box (assuming it even pisses in there anymore). It probably shits elsewhere that's not intended as well. The fact the shower is clogged and the moron hasn't used draino is the reddest flag, piss is still liquid.
>How would that even happen?
>The fact the shower is clogged and the moron hasn't used draino is the reddest flag, piss is still liquid.
This to me is the worst. How long is that cat pissing to even clog a fricking drain?
There must be full of hair or other shit in those pipes, I seriously hope it isn't just piss. It would probably take years to clog a pipe with piss.
Why would any amount of piss clog a pipe? Does cat piss solidify?
Given it's a troon, he probably shaved in the shower many times and just never properly drained it, plus cats and fur. So a cat routinely going in there is just as likely to leave fur as a troon shaving for months at a time. It's gross to think about but I am training to be a plumber and pet hair clogging is not as uncommon as you think. But I would charge extra for this, or decline it.
>and pet hair clogging is not as uncommon as you think. But I would charge extra for this, or decline it.
I believe you, any household with pets inside is filled with animal fur. Those pipes have enough cat fur and tron hair to make toupees for a whole monk monastery.
Yep, grooming salons are nuts with declog services.
>pissing to the point of clogging a drain
How would that even happen?
Where does xe/xer prepare her hormones now? The sink?
>Blaming the cat
why do game developers feel entitled to only get positive reviews from customers despite their product being shit?
Stop release suckass games
Looking at that username, I thought it was "Dev Team Ls"
b***h made devs
learn2ignore
>I'm going to kill you.
Muh death threats is such an easy lie
I bet $100 no one actually said this
Where you get these pics?
Don't be a pretentious twat.
Respect needs to be earned. Just calling yourself a game developer isn't enough.
Lots of people go into certain fields without really caring about them. Do you think most software devs are passionate about their job?
>Do you think most software devs are passionate about their job?
do you think most cops care about the law?
Is that a trick question?
Will you shoot me if I say no?
I'm not saying that I'm NOT going to shoot you. What I said is pick up that can.
I could work for NASA. That doesn't mean I would be good at what I do.
Shouldn't be bad at their job then.
Games are art. Shit artists deserve no recognition.
>madden gif generator
now thats an old meme
wish i saved some of the good ones
I thank Jesus every day that the western gamedev industry is collapsing in on itself
It's making more money than the movie and music industry combined.
Enjoy your endless amounts of trash
cope
western games are still 10x better than any eastslop lmao
>who decided to make it their job?
I'm not a black woman so HR wouldn't give me an interview
You make games so you can i dulge your narcissism and spread your diseased worldviews. I play games because I like games.
sounds like a stupid decision on their part
How about you make decent games first
How about you actually try to pay attention at the playtest instead of playing worse than an IGN journalist because you’re drunk and don’t give a shit?
Hire better playtesters then.
Yeah, I said hire. as in paying them.
Ain't nobody who gives less of a shit about the Big Mac that I ordered than the guy working the grill
Why do devs feel like they need to get special treatment? Nobody cares for the individual factory workers who built your car, or the mexicans who produce your lemons. Give people what they want and you get money.
Because they try to build parasocial communities and then get fricked by exposing themselves so much. The industrial workers that built your car didn't make a discord server for it or tweet about it.
This thread is bait. It was created with the intent to make you upset! Do not be fooled my dear anons.
🙂
Thanks, I don't want to spend my Sunday being mad. Closing this thread now.
If they cared so much about making games they would make good ones, not steaming piles of feces injected with woke politics.
Treating others with compassion is not being woke, also Ron DeSantis will never be president. You just need someone to care about you, Anon. I do. It isn't your fault.
What are you even speaking about and why did you assume I was a greasy mutt?
And on you're point, I can tell you a conservative cares more about people than any woketard, since woketards only care for the global population (aka no one), meanwhile conservatives care about their relatives and nearest countrymen, which will make them actually try to better their lives unlike the average woketard who hates everyone who's not a rich urbanite with all their guts.
>hey I noticed that the game directions say press X to jump, but when I press X the character shits his pants and apologizes for being white. can we get that fixed???
>"I THINK I KNOW A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT GAMES THAN YOU DO. ITS MY JOB AFTER ALL"
>[Space] Say "Apple"
What sort of brainrot do you need to have to decide the best way to get people to respect you is to antagonize them?
Why does such brainrot seem to be spreading and becoming more common every month?
The goal is poking your enemies into acting like your enemy so you can go "see, I was right." Just human nature
Acting like a c**t just so you can say "see, I AM a c**t!" seems more like moron behavior to me.
>He would actually pick Child A
Roundhouse kick child A and C.
non-sequitur. whether Child A would enjoy the flute more is a separate question from who ought to get the flute.
Make them work for me for a chance of getting enough money to pay for the flute with the unspoken premise that they never will
I would take the flute and anally violate people who construct homosexual ethical scenarios.
I thought a stupider argument than A couldn’t exist and then I got to C…
These useless little frickers should get a job in the mines.
B getting it is fairest, A getting it is self serving for the giver (gets music out of it), C doesn't deserve shit.
This depends on the context of the situation and the ownership status of the flute. Does child b still have it in her possession or has she sold it or given it away?
B literally said that she doesn't want it taken away from her, meaning she possesses it, since she made it. No one else has a right to it unless she gives it away.
No she says she made it, it neither implies ownership nor possession. The point I’m trying to get at that this moral dilemma is moronic as it skews towards one child (B) who I agree does deserve it compared to the other two options. But my grievance is that the situation is far too vague. (B) doesn’t focus on the ownership aspect but rather the labor and material aspect which can be skewed in the direction of saying that anyone that either provides resources for or makes a product or item is entitled to it despite the fact that that may not always be the case.
Yes, if someone provides the materials or negotiates ownership beforehand then it changes things, but there's nothing in the question about that. If there was it would change the question.
But that’s the point, the question is being vague for the purpose of saying that labor and resources are all that matter in this situation and leaving out the specifics. It’s like saying that the factory worker is entitled to what is made in the factory because he put in the labor or the farmer is entitled to the a meal at a restaurant because he supplied the ingredients. There is a subtle message that leads the viewer to be bias in a certain direction while ignoring many important details.
The question is clearly about government redistribution so that stuff is irrelevant, which is why it's not part of the question. Within the given context, B is the clear owner.
Keep it I am a powerful adult and they are but children, the flute is mine
Why'd this dumb b***h make a flute she doesn't even know how to play?
To sell it to A.
Doesn't matter why as far as ownership is concerned.
The premise is flawed from the start because it's based on the idea that governments are meant to have control over citizens in the same way adults do over children. In this hypothetical it's B but the point it's trying to make is moot because the government should not have any part of this situation unless things get violent or B's property is stolen.
>Take the flute from B and give it to A because A can use it best
>Days later B approaches you with a massive dildo she made
>She insists you take it because you're the one who can use it best
Child C has nothing but there's still a possible future for him. He ought to start by learning how to make a flute rather than stealing one or learning how to play it.
Child B made the flute and owns the flute. She can now start learning how to play the flute.
Child A is a scumbag who is depending on others to prop her up. Rather than learning how to make a flute herself she'd rather have someone else make the flute and then steal it. Without Child B she is worthless and is showing absolutely no willingness to change.
How did Child A even learn to play without owning a flute? She doesn't deserve the flute, she probably sucks.
she plays the skin flute
I'll keep the flute and auction it to highest bidder. Instruments are surprisingly costly.
>three children are fighting over a flute
strongest wins, not my problem
Would it be losing some point of this to change it to a tool for improving the situation for everyone (We live in a society)?
Like A is an experienced builder, B just invented the hammer, and we all live in a house that needs fixing?
>and we all live in a house that needs fixing?
I do not trust anon to live alone with 3 children.
there's also a mother, but you're the shot-caller
he didn't "invent" the hammer in this analogy, he made it himself and now he owns it
surely he would sell it if someone just asked him. Why should he give away his labor for free?
Give flute to C, he sell it to A and they are happy. C learns to work thank to that action and ask B for another flute, he wants money for it and C gives 2/3 of the money. Now A can consume in peace, B make products and C finally has a work.
to me it seems that all of these are equally valid
The mentality of giving things to child c is why we waste billions on aid to africa.
I give them another "flute" to play. Whoever plays it the best gets the flute.
I break the flute in front of the 3 children and laugh maniacally
anything but child B is extremely fricking unfair to child B
If your enemies will hate you no matter how you temper or present your beliefs and actions, why not just do what they say you do? You can't win with them, why not just accelerate?
>If your enemies will hate you no matter how you temper or present your beliefs and actions, why not just do what they say you do? You can't win with them, why not just accelerate?
Because then you lose everyone else.
Think of it like this, 10% are hardcore Team A. 10% are hardcore team B. You're never going to convince those.
Then there's 20% team A, 20%team B. These are people who have taken one side and are committed to it, but if something extreme happens, you couldlose them.
Then there's 40% undecided, they might lean team A or B, but if that side does something they don't like, they'll shift over to the other team.
If you're team B, and you start acting like team A's strawman of you, you're going to lose all but that first 10%.
Those fence sitters were never actually fence sitters if they are so easily convinced by one person who is an extremist. They were just waiting to show their true colors.
In this case I took "you" to be representitive of individual actors within "your movement". It's not about one person from team B radicalizing, it's about team B collectively saying "frick it, you think we're fascist? let's just be fascist then"
I think we're splitting hairs and getting confused here. I want what you are describing to happen. I want politically strong beliefs to be the norm, and I want people to segregate themselves based on them.
1. There's a big difference between being convinced by one person radicallizing and recoiling at an entire party radicallizing.
2. So you're just using the other side's argument as an excuse to get other people to adopt your belief and not actually asking the question you initially posted?
If so, you're a disgusting sack of shit just as bad as those you fight.
I don't care about hypocrisy. I care about my side winning and having the most people.
Didn't accuse you of hypocrisy anon, just of being as disgusting as the commies and asked you to confirm you're not an honest actor.
You're not getting it. It's like trolling. They make you want to bite back, use the topic to pretend they didn't instigate it, and go "see this guy is an IRL strawman I'm the sane comic self insert".
Post homestuck it will eat the image limit and salt the metaphorical earth.
Just accept my team knows better what’s good for you and put us in places of power, little chuddie, so we can make the world a better place, even for stupid fricking hicks like you.
Thanks.
Aren't you the people that say an embryo is a human being
I’m whoever and whatever you want me to be.
Signed,
Your friendly neighborhood Strawman
To be honest I don't think they can help it, they don't know how to speak differently. They're just damaged people.
Here is the genuine and unafraid culture you want, bro. Enjoy.
?si=DZdVZG98pnUV2xsv
Respect is earned, damanding respect only shows you don't deserve it.
who cares more about music, a musician or a guy in a guitar factory?
sweat shop factory or master artisan factory?
The "master artisan" doesn't make his goods in a factory but a workshop.
This is definitively NOT how you get people to respect you.
This feels like typical out of touch god complex shit or whatever it’s called where a person thinks that because they’re at the forefront that somehow they’re an authority on something and can talk down to everyone about it. It’s like if a luggage attendant tries to smugly explain planes to an aircraft engineer.
most western devs didnt "decide to make it their jobs"
they failed to get jobs in other fields like movies, books, politics, etc so they settled with games
I work in gamedev
I can confirm the majority of people do not give a frick about games. At best they care about their discipline. It's quite disheartening to see how little passion they have for it
Legitimately all they want is political involvement and spreading their ideology, so why not just be a staffer for a political party they agree with? Probably pays the same as these low tier game dev jobs and it's actually what they want to do. I don't get it.
How many of them pretend to care on social media to earn brownie points? Also do you work at a company or are you independent?
Art dies with critism
would
mare women owe me sex
Gamers cry and shit themselves at the sight of a state machine kek.
To be honest they're right in some way, they choose a really shit job with a horrible payment if you work for a company or a fricking gamble if you go indie, people that care about videogames would want in some point to do videogames but the job itself is just not worth it so they need to cope the mediocrity of the job with praises of the videogame "community" and nothing give you more praises lately than being woke.
So yeah, they would care more than us but it's not our fault that making a videogame nowday is such a shit job in so many aspect and it's not our fault to say that a game is shit and full of woke shit, this is just a chain reaction were no one won.
>want to create a propaganda piece that makes you money
>this means you care about video games
no it doesn't
Well, they care enough to make a game they fill with their propaganda, they decide to ruin their own life with a shitty job and be walking clown for the sake of their game, so yeah, they care more than us, but that will not stop us to complain about them and we're totally justified because such game is just a piece of shit.
The question isn't "do they care" at this point, it's "what do they care about?" In the sutuation being argued over, it's not the video games. The video games are just the vehicle for what they really care about, the propaganda.
Yeah, if the payment is complete shit at least the unique thing they can care about is promoting the propaganda for these little praises in twitter and discord and the casual woke journalist articles saying that you're one of the goods ones.
But there come the problem, no one that actually care about videogame is dumb enough to work in one because they know that would be a really shitty decision and a waste of time, that's usually the main issue right now, working to make videogames it's not worth it and that lead to that people that make these videogames not worth it to play.
At least we can agree the real problem is how shitty is the risk of making a videogame or working for a videogame company, if the payment was better more competent people would get it but the job is so bad that there's no incentive to even get inside, leaving just these wokegays to be the only ones that apply for that shit job.
None of these untalented people will be fired and paying the rates that like, IT companies or security tech ones do for their talent would make video games cost even more. The future of video games is more and more and more money spent to make employees happy but they aren't happy
game devs sometimes care about video games, i'm saying that being a game dev doesn't inherently mean you care more about video games than players, especially these days.
you don't need justification to comment on a product, especially a paid one. the fact that they don't care about your opinion as a player, as well as
>don't care if the game works
>don't care if the game is good
>don't care if the game is even a game really
means that they in fact do not care about video games as much as me.
He's so close to almost getting it.
This shit is somehow less interesting than Dilbert. I don't know how someone accomplishes that.
Dilbert is ludo kino
"Lisa" will never be a woman.
>"Why don't they just talk about how bad things are and how terrible everyone is doing for three hours?!"
I would prefer that than whatever they're doing now though. TGA is shit.
Why would I care about AI? I care about results. If an AI can effectively replace you, find a job where you're needed.
I didn't go to school for seven years and study law to take a job cutting hair for $20 an hour. AI is a fundamental threat to my job
>I didn't go to school for seven years and study law to take a job cutting hair for $20 an hour
I dunno man, it kinda sounds like that's exactly what you did.
How does that concern me? As a client, I don't care who or what gets me the results I want, as long as I get them.
AI does not understand law, it's just hallucinating shit. You are fricking yourself by relying on it.
Then AI isn't replacing you, yet. Game devs are a different story, because they're so inept that AI is preferable.
>layed off
It's "laid off", fricking concept artist can't even spell.
Frick even copy and pasted the same drawing and had the idea to just scale it up 4x. Fricking lazy homosexual can't even into hands.
Genuinely, what does this person thinks the VGAs are? It's advertising for games that already came out, games that will come out and products in between. The first ever VGA was not hosted to promote art, Madden 2004 was GOTY that year.
her eye look like a poosie
game developers want a paycheck and to put as much woke shit in games as possible. It's why we moved away from scores and fun things to do and moved toward sociopolitical propaganda
That is one of the ugliest fricking drawings I have ever seen
I didn't know human resources was a dev job.
Shut up b***h.
while lisa is very good at talking i think she should say less stuff and go to the kitchen
>devote your entire life to do one thing, and then you find out you are just bad at it
Good job devs.
Maybe Lisa should stop being a dumb Black person and learn proper grammar before she starts asking for respect.
I'll never get consumer guilt, unless I live near the business and know the people then it's just purely business for me.