What are some obvious filler designs? Pokemon where it was clear no creativity or thought was put into them and they're just there to fill a space.
I don't necessarily just mean ugly designs, I more mean boring, lazy. Like that Barnacle Pokemon I think is an ugly design, but you know what? We didn't have a Barnacle Pokemon before so as weird as that is at least it was an attempt at something new. This? This is just a fricking penguin with an ice cube on it's head. It doesn't even match the rest of the designs in the series.
 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
>guys we need a zebra pokemon what should we do?
>uhhh I dunno just draw the most generic looking zebra ever and randomly slap a wacky type on it or something I dunno
I like her and don't think she's too lazily designed. The lightning elements are clear and it's better than just yet another another yellow shocker.
Now this is a lazy Electric type. It's just a dog with some yellow on it. The prevo wasn't too special either, but at least Yamper had more to it.
I liked Boltund, he was my main electric type in Sword until I found a Toxel. In general I like dogs, and I ike the way the colors flow throught it's body. My favorite part is it's tail and how when it's at attention it looks like a lightning bolt, but if it's not excited it doesn't. I also like how when it gigantimaxes from underneath it's face shape matches certain breeds of dog that tend to have bugged out eyes and keep their ears back.
I don't get how it grows out of a Corgi though.
I agree with your take on Boltund, but there was some thought put into its design. It's supposed to be a "superhero dog" that goes after villains (Theivul). It's a play on foxhounds hunting foxes. Still shit, though.
Its just another mon that looks better in motion
Yet I fricking love it. Especialy fact its black and has white markings that glow.
LITERALLY MY MOM'S ZEBRA
These. Earlygame animal + element electric types are the definition of filler.
All based designs, as usual this board has horrendous opinions
Frick you gay ass homie
(minus togepi, riolu, and toxel)
Everyone has a favourite.
>generic fish but
>....
I like how this has a big bug move pool. Actually unique
you could remove all of these and no one would give a single shit
>basculin
not anymore
Shut the FRICK UP about Mandibuzz.
>maractus
>swanna
>deerling
>dwebble
I absolutely would give a shit. I fricking love these things
t. Xatu
As a Mienshao fan I care
But I like these ones
Horrid taste
>dwebble and crustle, one of my favourites
>Audino, the only pokemon from that gen to get a megaevo
>Literally Landorus, and T Landorus, frequently used in competitive
>Maractus, so bad but with at least decent design
Shit taste anon,with all respect
>removing based alien beeheeyem
frick outta here
I like Audino, Sawk, Throh, Beartic, druddigon, Durant, the swords, and the dancey girl and would be disappointed if they were removed
>removing escavalier
I will show up in your house with a firearm. Get ready
>removing Crustle, Zebstrika, Swoobat, Escavalier, Accelgor, Mienshao, Mandibuzz, Durant, all those legendaries
go frick yourself.
all the others are right though. they are fillermon. especially Druddigon and Bouffalant.
this would be removing a good chunk of my favourites, so respectfully frick you
You again?
>Dwebble and Crustle
>Sigilyph
>Deerling and Sawsbuck
>Escavalier and Accelegor
>Stunfisk
>Meinfoo and Meinshao
>Swords of Justice
>Meloetta
>Genesect
Get better taste.
Lazy or not, I still like that Pokémon because of how weird it is.
>Nidoking line
>Nidoqueen line
>Rhydon line
Literally 8 copies of the same pokemon.
Hence why Rhyperior is better, it's not the same thing as those.
I think Basculin is the only mon confirmed to be literal dex filler.
Unova didn't have enough fishmons, so they shat together Basculin.
and they eventually redeemed it
I think that makes Basculin the opposite of filler. It was literally designed with a purpose - world building and expanding the available pool of pokemon in specific areas.
>spearow line or pidgey line
we only need one fricking bird pigeot was dogshit in gen 1
>jigglypuff or clefable
we only needed one, wigglytuff was shitty
>persian
despite having good stats, persian was a horrible design, a bipedal maneki neko becomes a generic panther. How about a sphinx, a bake neko, anything but that shit.
>butterfree/venomoth
we didn't need both one would have been fine
>Dewgong]
WTF? it's just a fricking sealion
>seaking
I know the legend, but still so generic
>furret
we didn't need another
>aipom
huh? why
>sunfora
it's a goddamn sunflower
>yanma
same
I could go on.
why do you talk like a homosexual? anyways, dewgong and yanma are based
no they aren't, they are shitty and generic fricking designs.
>yanma
did we need another bug flying with bad stats to boot, frick no.
>dewgong
I honestly don't get why anyone would like this one, it's kinda just there.
Dragonflies are cool. Frick you, homosexual.
>I honestly don't get why anyone would like this one
Because anything you don't personally like is automatically "bad" and you have some mental problem that makes you incapable of understanding the perspectives of others.
Your taste is shit in general but
>we didn't need another
Another what? Are you actually saying there shouldn't be any new Normal types just because Raticate exists?
>w Normal types just because Raticate exists?
There shouldn't be another low stat, intentionally bad filler pokemon yes. Snorlax is a great normal type, porygon got an evolution, Tarous was great at the time, miltank did great too.
well yeah, they are, we but we don't need a cut and paste irl dragonfly with bad stats.
stop acting white
I hate Stonjourner.
Just some rocks with a face on it
It's an adventure time character that has 5 seconds of screen time