Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
However, I will take this opportunity to say if you are unironically one of those "you just know" posters who is secretly upset that there are more women who are turned on by dogs than are turned on by men like you, you might instead think about the positive qualities dogs have that you lack and improving on them.
>Simping for literal dogfrickers
Anon, no one wants those nasty b***hes, and public mockery is probably the only real criticism they have ever experienced in their lives.
>I can't even untangle the mental gymnastics involved in this reply and I'm pretty good at that.
Really? >women are right to prefer dogs=women are right to not want men=women are right to not want me=I want women to get dick that's not mine and I think that is good=NTR
This is not complicated, is this your first day as a human?
In the period of my life where I was privy to the open sexuality of many many women I encountered only a handful of actual dog frickers. There are much more common fetishes you would think would be much more contemptible by Anon...
Significantly, the majority of the actual dogfrickers did it at the urging of their human boyfriends which leads me to suspect it is actually some sort of cuckolding fetish of men who consider thematically physically inadequate to satisfy women - which also falls directly in line with Anons in this very thread immediately projecting those fetishes in tandem.
It was explained to me once as "all the convenience of living partner with none the bullshit of relationship", and honestly when you look at from that angle it's hard to argument against.
>However, I will take this opportunity to say if you are unironically one of those "you just know" posters who is secretly upset that there are more women who are turned on by dogs than are turned on by men like you, you might instead think about the positive qualities dogs have that you lack and improving on them.
>Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
Roleplay wise, yes women are definitely better than men when it comes to those classes. I would say that men are better at piloting all classes mechanically because of their inclination towards mathematics and autistically optimizing everything for catharsis or status.
Other classes that seem to click with women RP wise are any full casters without melee proficiency (Wizard, Sorcerer). Many of the female players I have played with over the years have gravitated towards powerful magic users who are flimsy and can't fight physically.
Rogue seems to be one as well. Frail but with high damage in combat.
And then, like you said, Support classes as well (Cleric, Bard, and maybe Druid).
Barbarian, Fighter, Paladin, and Monk to a lesser extent seem to be mostly ignored by female players.
>Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
This is legit correct, setting aside you spilling your power level later on. Female players tend to enjoy classes that don't put them in the thick of combat, they don't like trading hits of feeling the hot spray of their enemy's blood. However:
Barbarian
Women looooove the idea of getting to emote freely with no consequences and that's what a barbarian is all about, the ultimate hedonist class, it's what a lot of women aspire to be. Powerful, free, and unaccountable.
This thread will go to hell, and for good reason.
If you want to make a disguised thread like this, you should be masking it by discussing a system that has different stats or classes for the sexes. That way, you'll have an actual /tg/ discussion, and your titty thread both at the same time.
Female scibes existed since Mesopotamia, in fact the reason why Epic of Gilgamesh has some blatant homoerotic undertones between the protagonist and his companion Enkidu is because the version of the story that was preserved until present day was essentially their yaoi fanfic.
>Female scribes existed since Mesopotamia
True. >in fact the reason why Epic of Gilgamesh has some blatant homoerotic undertones between the protagonist and his companion Enkidu is because the version of the story that was preserved until present day was essentially their yaoi fanfic.
Horseshit.
Cleric, Sorcerer, Bard, and Warlock all seem to me to have a fairly feminine bent to them. I'd argue that Rogue, Paladin, and Ranger are also acceptable but there's a strong masculine undercurrent to both that prevents any easy pidgeonholing. Fighter, Wizard, Monk, Barbarian, and Druid, very masculine, focused on detached, monomaniacal obsessions or prolonged, intense discomfort. Of course, this is viewing the classes as an archetype rather than the abstraction they are in-game. I fricking hate 5e so goddamn much.
hahaha no. The remains of the Minoan society after the collaps, got invaded by the Mycenaeans and finally destroyed for good.
Only thing they brought back was the sweet loot and artwork.
But that's not true at all. The minotaur myth is a metaphor for Minoan human sacrifices and how the mycenaeans destroyed the Minoans in order to put an end to their tyranny
2 years ago
Anonymous
You sound like an amerishart. People don't invade to "put an end to tyranny" (lmao). What happened was that invading Mycenaeans took over Minoan territories, but ended up assimilating into the superior Minoan culture and copying it. And then Dorians did that to themselves as well. Welcome to migrations.
>the first and second most favored classes among women are the second and third most favored classes among men >the #1 most favored class among men, while significantly higher than the rest of the male choices, is still fairly high among women and on par with other classes considered to be well-designed or powerful >the only real other notable gap is how few women play fighter, but it basically looks like they play Barbarian instead
My god, do you actual believe that D&D lore is an accurate depiction of medieval attitudes?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Definition and operation of concepts, especially as timeless as wizardry has little to with attitudes.
Yes some may think something, but their thinking is just that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The accusation that witches conspire with the Devil is a very medieval attitude, so you're trying to sit on two chairs here. Either both do that, or none of them do.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I wasn't talking about those accusations, but rather how actual wizards work.
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are no actual wizards, or actual witches, for that matter.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You sure about that?
2 years ago
Anonymous
NTA but it does seem like there are a non-zero number of recent events that only could have taken place through satan worship and/or witchcraft.
2 years ago
Anonymous
humans are more than capable of fricking up the world on our own
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Muh candidate lost, it must be witchcraft. They have to have cheated somehow. How will I explain this to my wife's son?
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's hilarious because this is what Trumpists unironically say about 2020.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Q brought me wwg1wga trust the plan
2 years ago
Anonymous
Demons are probably laughing at how badly we're fricking things up all on our own
Barbarian. Women are known to be emotional.
Bard. Women are known to be artistic.
Cleric. Women are known to be fanatic.
Druid. Women are known to like animals.
Fighter. Women are known to be vicious.
Monk. Women are known to go for the throat.
Paladin. Women are known to be pure.
Ranger. Women are known to like nature.
Rogue. Women are known to like to steal shit.
Sorcerer. Women are known to have magic
Warlock. Women are known to make deals.
Wizard. Women are known to use tricks to make up for their lack of raw strength.
>Sorcerer: Boobs are where they store their magic powers. >Rogue: Women are more flexible and smaller than males making them more stealthy. >Bard: Essentially a mix between sorcerer and rogue. Plus they are better at seducing. >Druid: Something something mother nature something something dog fricker. >Warlock: Patron gods like big booba and are more likely to simp for her. >Cleric: See above. >Alchemist: A weird one, but women are better at noticing small color difference which can be useful when determining the type and potency of a specific potion. Though it would be a negligible difference.
As far as the others go, I would say women would be equal to men as artificers and wizards as these classes are mental based. One could also make the case for cavaliers given most female warriors of antiquity were cavalry.
Men would make better barbarians, fighters, paladins, and monks for obvious reasons. They would also make better rangers as men have better depth perception than women making them better with the bow. Some applies to Gunslinger.
I would say women tend to have higher Dex and Cha while men have better Str, Con, and perception.
Men and women are equal Int and Wis wise.
Arts and Crafts
Barbarian
you're shitposting but you're accidentally right.
NPC
Beastmaster ranger
You Just Know
Commoner
Sorcerers use their hotness to cast spells, so...
Broodmother
My my, she's awfully sweaty down there.
Literally none, not even cook.
factually untrue
women are better midwives as they can also breastfeed
at least for most races
Men can breastfeed too.
Ranger, druid, cavalier, any pet class
You just know why
Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
However, I will take this opportunity to say if you are unironically one of those "you just know" posters who is secretly upset that there are more women who are turned on by dogs than are turned on by men like you, you might instead think about the positive qualities dogs have that you lack and improving on them.
>Simping for literal dogfrickers
Anon, no one wants those nasty b***hes, and public mockery is probably the only real criticism they have ever experienced in their lives.
The point is that the vast majority of women are dogfrickers, most of them just frick men who act like dogs rather than actual dogs.
I can't even untangle the mental gymnastics involved in this reply and I'm pretty good at that.
Ok, what a frick. Is this a thing with western women? Do they just frick dogs?
Small number of women actually fricks dogs, and Ganker likes to meme the fact out of proportions.
>I can't even untangle the mental gymnastics involved in this reply and I'm pretty good at that.
Really?
>women are right to prefer dogs=women are right to not want men=women are right to not want me=I want women to get dick that's not mine and I think that is good=NTR
This is not complicated, is this your first day as a human?
nta, but how many dogfrickers do you think really see these posts? It has to be a lot more uncommon than anons meme it to be.
In the period of my life where I was privy to the open sexuality of many many women I encountered only a handful of actual dog frickers. There are much more common fetishes you would think would be much more contemptible by Anon...
Significantly, the majority of the actual dogfrickers did it at the urging of their human boyfriends which leads me to suspect it is actually some sort of cuckolding fetish of men who consider thematically physically inadequate to satisfy women - which also falls directly in line with Anons in this very thread immediately projecting those fetishes in tandem.
NTRgays exist in real life, the post
found the dog fricker
It was explained to me once as "all the convenience of living partner with none the bullshit of relationship", and honestly when you look at from that angle it's hard to argument against.
>"all the convenience of living partner with none the bullshit of relationship"
You found that hard to argue against?
What, does the dog make the coffee in the morning?
"She still loves me, it's just that Jamal looks after her physical needs and I look after her emotional needs"
If it upsets you so much then be Jamal, Stupid. How dense can you possibly be?
If what you got from my post was "this guy is upset about jamal" then you must literally be a dog
Woof
>does the dog make the coffee in the morning?
Which part of "none the bullshit of relationship" did you not understand?
>However, I will take this opportunity to say if you are unironically one of those "you just know" posters who is secretly upset that there are more women who are turned on by dogs than are turned on by men like you, you might instead think about the positive qualities dogs have that you lack and improving on them.
>positive qualities dogs
shitting on carpets?
begging for food?
>brings up dog frickers completely unprompted
ruh roh?
also:
https://youtu.be/1gayNp9xvNQ
>brings up dog frickers completely unprompted
The "you just know" posts were literally the majority of the thread up to that point.
No. What?
Only one single "you just know" post before it.
>Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
Roleplay wise, yes women are definitely better than men when it comes to those classes. I would say that men are better at piloting all classes mechanically because of their inclination towards mathematics and autistically optimizing everything for catharsis or status.
Other classes that seem to click with women RP wise are any full casters without melee proficiency (Wizard, Sorcerer). Many of the female players I have played with over the years have gravitated towards powerful magic users who are flimsy and can't fight physically.
Rogue seems to be one as well. Frail but with high damage in combat.
And then, like you said, Support classes as well (Cleric, Bard, and maybe Druid).
Barbarian, Fighter, Paladin, and Monk to a lesser extent seem to be mostly ignored by female players.
>Women are perhaps actually better at playing charisma based RP/Support classes eg Bard, they do seem to be more fond of pet classes than male players.
This is legit correct, setting aside you spilling your power level later on. Female players tend to enjoy classes that don't put them in the thick of combat, they don't like trading hits of feeling the hot spray of their enemy's blood. However:
Women looooove the idea of getting to emote freely with no consequences and that's what a barbarian is all about, the ultimate hedonist class, it's what a lot of women aspire to be. Powerful, free, and unaccountable.
The underclass
Clerics and warlocks, because their job is basically just asking someone else to do something for them and then taking the credit.
prostitute
or Bard
The only skill that sex is an indicator of is how hard I fricked your mom last night.
Do Americans really believe this?
No, that was worded too awkwardly for English to be that guy's first language.
Dancer, wait actually men could do that better too but depends on the dance and situation
This thread will go to hell, and for good reason.
If you want to make a disguised thread like this, you should be masking it by discussing a system that has different stats or classes for the sexes. That way, you'll have an actual /tg/ discussion, and your titty thread both at the same time.
Prostitute, maid, nun, or damsel in destress.
>damsel in distress.
but cute guys are way better at that
Maid (male) is also a step up.
You're absolutely right Anon
Look at the real-life classes that are restricted to women, the ones that don't even have a male equivalent word
>Nurse
>Librarian
>Nun
>Dominatrix
That way you can approximate which classes might be most suitable for them in a tabletop game with classes, by looking for equivalents
Librarian describes someone male. At the time the term was created women weren't allowed to read.
>At the time the term was created women weren't allowed to read.
Good times
Female scibes existed since Mesopotamia, in fact the reason why Epic of Gilgamesh has some blatant homoerotic undertones between the protagonist and his companion Enkidu is because the version of the story that was preserved until present day was essentially their yaoi fanfic.
>Female scribes existed since Mesopotamia
True.
>in fact the reason why Epic of Gilgamesh has some blatant homoerotic undertones between the protagonist and his companion Enkidu is because the version of the story that was preserved until present day was essentially their yaoi fanfic.
Horseshit.
Male form of "dominatrix" is simply "dominator"
Rogue
>Much easier to get ignored in combat and stab someone in the back if you're a woman
Bard
>Easier to capture people with your beauty and charisma
>Less stigma around dancing, singing, and performing
Warlock
>Much easier to trade your pure and innocent soul for powers
Cleric, Sorcerer, Bard, and Warlock all seem to me to have a fairly feminine bent to them. I'd argue that Rogue, Paladin, and Ranger are also acceptable but there's a strong masculine undercurrent to both that prevents any easy pidgeonholing. Fighter, Wizard, Monk, Barbarian, and Druid, very masculine, focused on detached, monomaniacal obsessions or prolonged, intense discomfort. Of course, this is viewing the classes as an archetype rather than the abstraction they are in-game. I fricking hate 5e so goddamn much.
Cleric
And the most manly class is... not barbarian, and thankfully not fighter, but wizard.
woman indicates sex, not gender dentity
Religions that allow female clergy are hallmarks of dying civilizations.
Minoans did just fine with female clergy.
And where are the Minoans today, anon?
They turned into Mycenaeans, who turned into Greeks. Who gave you your civilisation.
All those are gone. Greece today is not the same as it was bazillion years ago.
>things change in a bazillion years
wow
hahaha no. The remains of the Minoan society after the collaps, got invaded by the Mycenaeans and finally destroyed for good.
Only thing they brought back was the sweet loot and artwork.
I wouldn't mind looting some of that myself.
>Greek
Didn't they get their knowledge, at least some of it, from Akkad and other areas?
Akkad fell apart like two thousand years before the emergence of modern Greeks.
Modern Greeks?
You mean ancient?
There's a far smoother continuity between ancient greeks and modern greeks than anything before the Dorian invasion.
But that's not true at all. The minotaur myth is a metaphor for Minoan human sacrifices and how the mycenaeans destroyed the Minoans in order to put an end to their tyranny
You sound like an amerishart. People don't invade to "put an end to tyranny" (lmao). What happened was that invading Mycenaeans took over Minoan territories, but ended up assimilating into the superior Minoan culture and copying it. And then Dorians did that to themselves as well. Welcome to migrations.
Breaking! Local man forgets that nuns exist.
Breaking! Local man forgets to google 'Are nuns part of the clergy'
Nuns are female monks
Nuns are the female version of Muns
Without knowledge of the sample this is a useless and misleading figure.
>blood hunter
i said real D&D
>the first and second most favored classes among women are the second and third most favored classes among men
>the #1 most favored class among men, while significantly higher than the rest of the male choices, is still fairly high among women and on par with other classes considered to be well-designed or powerful
>the only real other notable gap is how few women play fighter, but it basically looks like they play Barbarian instead
this seems entirely fabricated
Did this filter troons?
It's labeled "gender identity" so no.
Then it can't be taken as anything but an indicator of which classes troons are partial to.
Nun.
Sorcerer
>requires high CHA
>doesn't rely on physical strength
>doesn't rely on intelligence
>fits a classic archetype
Witch is arguably even better but isn't an option in as many games
Witch is just a female wizard.
Technically yes, but they have different connotations to most people and they are treated as different classes in some games
>Witch is just a female Wizard
You mean Warlock. A witch sells her petite little virginity to the devil for magical powers.
People who say that forget to mention that the exact same accusations were levelled against male wizards.
>wizards are homosexuals
It all makes sense now
Actual wizards operate on their own power, so that's a strange accusation.
it's not exactly apples to apples, comparing the Merlin of 6th century England with an ugly spinster from 17th century Salem
NTA but Merlin was supposedly the child of the Devil and meant to be the antichrist except he rejected his 'destiny'.
Merlin was literally an incubus Anti-Christ evil wizard, who was only prevented from that by being baptised. And it only mostly worked, too.
My god, do you actual believe that D&D lore is an accurate depiction of medieval attitudes?
Definition and operation of concepts, especially as timeless as wizardry has little to with attitudes.
Yes some may think something, but their thinking is just that.
The accusation that witches conspire with the Devil is a very medieval attitude, so you're trying to sit on two chairs here. Either both do that, or none of them do.
I wasn't talking about those accusations, but rather how actual wizards work.
There are no actual wizards, or actual witches, for that matter.
You sure about that?
NTA but it does seem like there are a non-zero number of recent events that only could have taken place through satan worship and/or witchcraft.
humans are more than capable of fricking up the world on our own
>Muh candidate lost, it must be witchcraft. They have to have cheated somehow. How will I explain this to my wife's son?
it's hilarious because this is what Trumpists unironically say about 2020.
Q brought me wwg1wga trust the plan
Demons are probably laughing at how badly we're fricking things up all on our own
>witch sells her petite little virginity to the devil
No wonder they went extinct
sex haver
in most rpgs you're playing as impossible superhumans so the minor differences between the sexes are pretty moot.
>What class is better suited for women than for men?
prostitute.
Oracle, Witch, and Sorceress
I don't know, I usually play male characters instead of female characters. Makes doing a voice for them hard as hell though.
>If they have to have one:
Generally casters. (maybe rogues as well).
Healers/first aid
i don't understand the question but you do, so I would say your premise is immediately moot.
Barbarian. Women are known to be emotional.
Bard. Women are known to be artistic.
Cleric. Women are known to be fanatic.
Druid. Women are known to like animals.
Fighter. Women are known to be vicious.
Monk. Women are known to go for the throat.
Paladin. Women are known to be pure.
Ranger. Women are known to like nature.
Rogue. Women are known to like to steal shit.
Sorcerer. Women are known to have magic
Warlock. Women are known to make deals.
Wizard. Women are known to use tricks to make up for their lack of raw strength.
>Paladin. Women are known to be pure.
Wizardry doesn't concern itself with this approach, nor in any way implies lack of strength.
>Warlock. Women are known to make deals.
Sure are.
Behold, the synthesis of simp and incel. Stand in awe at your new god.
>Sorcerer: Boobs are where they store their magic powers.
>Rogue: Women are more flexible and smaller than males making them more stealthy.
>Bard: Essentially a mix between sorcerer and rogue. Plus they are better at seducing.
>Druid: Something something mother nature something something dog fricker.
>Warlock: Patron gods like big booba and are more likely to simp for her.
>Cleric: See above.
>Alchemist: A weird one, but women are better at noticing small color difference which can be useful when determining the type and potency of a specific potion. Though it would be a negligible difference.
As far as the others go, I would say women would be equal to men as artificers and wizards as these classes are mental based. One could also make the case for cavaliers given most female warriors of antiquity were cavalry.
Men would make better barbarians, fighters, paladins, and monks for obvious reasons. They would also make better rangers as men have better depth perception than women making them better with the bow. Some applies to Gunslinger.
I would say women tend to have higher Dex and Cha while men have better Str, Con, and perception.
Men and women are equal Int and Wis wise.
Blood mage, obviously.
Rogues, but just the backstabbing part.
>it's only batshit insanity when you say it sarcastically, not when we say it seriously
Right, "sarcastically."
Nurse, secretary, or primary school teacher
baby summoner
Did she fricking piss herself?
How the frick has nobody said Home Economics yet?
Isn't that the one where you do woodworking and cars
That's Shop I think. Home ec is cooking and basic life shit.
Programming
Consensus Seeker
Nurturer
Hypergamist
Illogician
Assassins who specialise in poisoning. Everyone knows that poison is the woman's weapon