Accurate >1 and 2 are good on their own >3 started something new and it's solid >4 is a different thing but not bad >5 started out good then goes bad later on
yeah, it's more about the fact that 2 and 3 are coherent to each other where as 1 is the odd man out since none of the other games feel like it aftewards
yeah, it's more about the fact that 2 and 3 are coherent to each other where as 1 is the odd man out since none of the other games feel like it aftewards
>2 solid games >third game is just a retread of the last two games with a new coat of paint >fourth game is something completely different while pretending to be a sequel >5th game is "okay for real we will finish this epic franchise" and it drops the ball halfway through
>first game starts something >second game continues it >third game is basically the same as the first two with something new instead of a continuation >devs give up and the fourth game is completely different >fifth game the devs attempt to continue the original idea but completely frick it up
>first game starts something >second game continues it >third game is basically the same as the first two with something new instead of a continuation >devs give up and the fourth game is completely different >fifth game the devs attempt to continue the original idea but completely frick it up
Need for Speed, kind of. >First no one talks about but was decent >Golden Age from IISE through HP2 >Ricer era from UG1 to PS(and Undercover I guess) >The identity crisis era with Shift and HP(2010) >Everything since NFS(2015)
Inscryption, all in the same game >starts out great in Act 1 >gets better when it starts again after dying with new cards and places >turns into something completely different in Act 2 >Act 3 is kind of like Act 1 but not really, it's also obviously unfinished and then the game just ends
This image is the Halo series.
Halo 1+2 are a very solid continuous story.
Halo 3 is more of the same with a new coat of paint/a glaring flaw (the rewritten ending, Truth downgrade).
Halo 3 ODST is its own thing.
Halo Reach is the conclusion that misses the mark (multiplayer).
Not just one game, but it fits the timeline of the original XCOM games quite well >Laser squad
just the tail, but has potential >UFO defense >Terror from the deep
pretty much a reskin >Apocalypse >Xenonauts
from 2 to 4 that's exactly Kingdom Under Fire >make fricking BANGERS of games combining hero action with real time strategy in Crusaders and Heroes >Heroes is just a recoat of Crusaders but still has an interesting plot, better soundtrack and new heroes >Circle of Doom is NOTHING like any of the games preceding it >II kills the franchise
I'm still seething
Palworld
Assassin's Creed
1-2
3
4 black flag onwards
the rpg games
Mirage
your favorite game
JoJo manga
Accurate
>1 and 2 are good on their own
>3 started something new and it's solid
>4 is a different thing but not bad
>5 started out good then goes bad later on
'jak and daxter?
Isn't 2 the tryhard edgelord one?
2 is the edgy one but it's also a soft reboot. 3 picks up where 2 left off while the characters and world of 1 are left behind to be forgotten.
Got it, only played 3 so I wouldn't know.
weird, the third one is the only one I haven't played yet besides Lost Frontier
yeah, it's more about the fact that 2 and 3 are coherent to each other where as 1 is the odd man out since none of the other games feel like it aftewards
I'm really struggling with what this means.
Maybe saints row
>2 solid games
>third game is just a retread of the last two games with a new coat of paint
>fourth game is something completely different while pretending to be a sequel
>5th game is "okay for real we will finish this epic franchise" and it drops the ball halfway through
not exactly the five games, but the idea fits
>horse 1: thps1
>horse 2: thps2, 3
>horse 3: thps4
>horse 4: THUG
>horse 5: American Wasteland
>first game starts something
>second game continues it
>third game is basically the same as the first two with something new instead of a continuation
>devs give up and the fourth game is completely different
>fifth game the devs attempt to continue the original idea but completely frick it up
Falls apart at 4th game, wasn't completely different so it'd be like horse 3 but with laser beams and dinosaurs
game is basically the same as the first two with something new instead of a continuation
I understood the pic as the 3rd game being a reboot.
True that's another way to see it.
Heh, that's pretty much it
i think its a game series that jumps all over the place and is very different every title
Kingdom Hearts
Final Fantasy franchise
Explain and Elaborate
>every game is randomly different
>the times it does have a good idea, they usually just never re-use it
No More Heroes
Replace everything with the copy pasted horse with flame ass
if you do 30% of content in ligmagrave you have seen 95% of all the content in the game
>snowfield
poor snowfield
Need for Speed, kind of.
>First no one talks about but was decent
>Golden Age from IISE through HP2
>Ricer era from UG1 to PS(and Undercover I guess)
>The identity crisis era with Shift and HP(2010)
>Everything since NFS(2015)
Depends on context,
>As a whole, Palworld
>As a series, Civilization
What's the cat part of Palworld? Its grinding craftslop all the way through
Inscryption, all in the same game
>starts out great in Act 1
>gets better when it starts again after dying with new cards and places
>turns into something completely different in Act 2
>Act 3 is kind of like Act 1 but not really, it's also obviously unfinished and then the game just ends
This image is the Halo series.
Halo 1+2 are a very solid continuous story.
Halo 3 is more of the same with a new coat of paint/a glaring flaw (the rewritten ending, Truth downgrade).
Halo 3 ODST is its own thing.
Halo Reach is the conclusion that misses the mark (multiplayer).
>a bunch of different RPG concepts mashed together and given a solid conclusive ending
Live a Live
Metal Gear Solid
Demon's Souls to Elden Ring.
You know I'm right.
unironically devil may cry
Resident Evil
Paper Mario
Metal Gear
If you have followed metal gear as a fan since at least Solid this boot fits too fricking well
voidstranger, but all the parts are high quality.
man what the frick did I play
The Persona series
inpainting
Not just one game, but it fits the timeline of the original XCOM games quite well
>Laser squad
just the tail, but has potential
>UFO defense
>Terror from the deep
pretty much a reskin
>Apocalypse
>Xenonauts
This fits a megaman..But I don't know what Megaman...Probably X
Nier Gestalt
Love it to death.
The Metal Gear Solid series
Final Fantasy
It's a fricking mess
Age of Empires (Mythology is the cat)
Dark Souls 1.
Lost Izalith specifically.
>Demon Souls
>Dark Souls
>Dark Souls 2
>Bloodborne
>Dark Souls 3
Almost works.
from 2 to 4 that's exactly Kingdom Under Fire
>make fricking BANGERS of games combining hero action with real time strategy in Crusaders and Heroes
>Heroes is just a recoat of Crusaders but still has an interesting plot, better soundtrack and new heroes
>Circle of Doom is NOTHING like any of the games preceding it
>II kills the franchise
I'm still seething
dark souls 2's patchwork development after the first director was kicked off the project
Nier Automata