What the frick is this? Pokemon should ended after gen 2.

nope, the artists were just better.

>what are magnets
are you really this braindead? there's no possible way

do you think that inspired by the natural world is the same thing as copy paste from the natural world?
it's true what they say about zoomers I guess

nice dodge

Oh, tell me, what NATURAL thing is Porygon, zoomie.

looks like a duck or bird made out of stone, are you dumb or stupid?

yeah this definitely doesnt look birdlike at all haha 🙂

>It's one of those dipping toys you put on a glass
you mean those bird like toys? cant be
>And it's also made out of computer code, hard light, Star Trek technology. That's as far away from nature and the real world as you can get.
wow thats crazy, i dont remember asking about it's lore. it's almost like we were talking about what it's design is inspired from

Are you? It was a digitally created pokemon made by Team Rocket, it's literally made of polygons.

>because Gen1 designs are from the natural world

The Gastly line are ghosts, fantasy beings.
Jynx and Electabuzz are oni and yokai, fantasy beings.
Magmar is a type of dragon called a salamander, a fantasy being.
Porygon is a virtual reality projection of pixels and polygons.
The Dratini line are dragons, fantasy creatures.
Mewtwo is Frieza from the hit manga Dragonball.

>there is a reason these hacks continue to shill and pander mons like the royal knights
FIFY
Now get the frick out of the thread

[...]

+general

[...]

+general

[...]

+general

[...]

+general

just a pokeBlack person's inferiority complex showing off

Now I want a Mario/Gex crossover game.

>anon didn't mention their agenda so it's not actually there
[...]
>inferiority
>when it's Pokemon vs a series that's been on life support for over a decade
lol
lmao even

Since when were Pikachu, Charizard, and Mewtwo the Royal Knights?

>how dare you know about more things that just pokemon?!

Also YOU were the one who brought up Digimon for no reason, fricktard. Are you brain-damaged or just moronic?

Dude, homosexual, troony, you took what someone said about three POKEMON, changed it to something about Digimon, then accused THEM of bringing up Digimon. I don't know what drugs you're on, but you need to stop abusing them.

Yeah, no, you're brain-damaged and obsessed. Enjoy the rest of your night and try not to harm yourself.

>anon didn't mention their agenda so it's not actually there

just a pokeBlack person's inferiority complex showing off

>inferiority
>when it's Pokemon vs a series that's been on life support for over a decade
lol
lmao even

If I wanted to watch a moron in spandex slap actors in sweaty costumes then yeah I'd watch ultraman

1. Is the concept of giant creatures exclusive to ultraman
2. Is pokemon about a giant dude fricking around with giant monsters

>He called me out, better call them an ESL despite using proper English.
another standard dodge
where in my post did I say that hitmonlee is an animal
i'll wait

youre either ESL are the reading comprehension of someone that is

they're designed after Jacky chan and Bruce lee

Bruce lee has spring legs though, and he's a creature that existed.

I don't speak Japanese dude. too many alphabets

how can you be so brain rotted that you can't distinguish any nuance between words?
"designs that resemble bipedal animals" is not the same as MUST BE EXACTLY LIKE BIPEDAL ANIMALS

no fricking bug looks like pinsir and has a face like that walking around on 2 legs, but we know that it's inspired from insects

god damn this site needs to purge all ESLs

wrong again
I said no bug looks like pinsir AND has a face like pinsir AND walks on 2 legs like pinsir to substantiate my earlier claim about not requiring 1for1 copypaste from the natural world, but just to have designs inspired from it. pinsir is obviously a beetle, but a beetle doesn't have its face or the same horns or walks on 2 legs
frick you ESL

ah ok, I forgot this discussion was about if pokemon were real or not
nice derail

So, we can identify what Pinsir is, and it's 'grounded in reality' making it a good design. But when we identify an icecream cone, which is also a thing in reality, with eyes and a mouth that don't appear on it in the real world, it's a bad design. Gotchya.

>GEN ONE IS TRASH
At least you got that right. The whole franchise is trash. Fricking grow up and watch La Blue Girl.

PC98.

>grounded in reality
this is the reason I think you're ESL. I have to reiterate for a 2nd time that I never once made any arguments about pokemon needing to be "grounded in reality"
keep fighting those ghosts though i guess

another convincing argument
I've definitely changed my mind now!

because the 2 former are designs inspired from the natural world, the latter is not
i know it's hard to read words for your ESL brain

if you're talking about me saying 2 former, I mistyped trying to say 3 former
if you weren't ESL you could have discerned that.

or do you think sludge/grime/mud isn't part of the natural world?

go to a swamp

pokemon was also created by humans

anything can be a pokemon. just because it's man made toxic sludge doesn't mean it doesn't exist

I agree.

In one of the gen 1 games, it might have been Yellow, they say it was trash brought to life by moon beams or some shit.

So, is your malfunction the Pokemon that aren't solely based on living animals and plants? Or the Pokemon that aren't based on "natural things"? Or the Pokemon that are anything man-made like ghosts, gods, genies, and other myths?

That's wrong though?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_beetle

how can you be so brain rotted that you can't distinguish any nuance between words?
"designs that resemble bipedal animals" is not the same as MUST BE EXACTLY LIKE BIPEDAL ANIMALS

no fricking bug looks like pinsir and has a face like that walking around on 2 legs, but we know that it's inspired from insects

>NO SEE, IT NEEDS TO HAVE A FACE LIKE PINSIR TO LOOK LIKE IT, YOU FRICKING ESL REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Met Ultraman, Ultraseven and Ultraman Blazar at New York Comic Con and laughed at the fact DBZ turned into Muppet Babies.

gargleanal?

I unironically like Garganacl's design.

no its good, frick standards. i want my potato chips bag to be a pokemon next haha

>loses an argument
>spergs out
Typical genwunner.

Wasn't an argument, it was a fact homosexual.

So you literally want more 'a rat but purple' and 'a snake but purple' cause that's the essence of Pokemon? Not the fact they're meant to be monsters? Just animals repainted? Christ almighty.

Mmhm, grounded in reality. Just ignore Koffing's existence.

are you incapable of understanding what a standard is? just say that next time
Gen1 set the standard for pokemon designs because the designs are inspired from the natural world. the reason people hate the later generations is because it goes against this standard

if you can't understand that, there's no helping you and you're truly lost

Koffing.

are you incapable of understanding what a standard is? just say that next time
Gen1 set the standard for pokemon designs because the designs are inspired from the natural world. the reason people hate the later generations is because it goes against this standard

if you can't understand that, there's no helping you and you're truly lost

>Gamefreak has been the same company since its inception
this is your brain on zoomerism

>we cant draw inspiration from the natural pokemon world either!
based moron zoomer

you make animals look monster like and still have a good design
Scyther is so fricking sick and it's literally a bug

>why do these Pocket Monsters look like monsters?!

Hmm, that's a mystery!

Yep, been replaying World Next Order too.
Currently replaying Digimon Story Cyber Sleuth yet again.

I thought you were this anon

Oh you moron.
>Ultraseven, when he couldn't transform, used CAPSULE MONSTERS to fight OTHER MONSTERS.
>Pokemon's original name was Capsumon.
Gee. It's like, the idea was stolen.
[...]
>He called me out, better call them an ESL despite using proper English.
[...]
That's hitmonchan. Frick you Zoomies can't even get that right?

idk what you're talking about. Gen 1 is my favorite

I was born the same year legend of Zelda came out. what the frick are you talking about?

Your requirement was 'the design has to be grounded in reality', then deflected when someone brought up Koffing and Weezing like a schizo, claiming 'IT'S ANTHROPAMORPZIED' like a moron. You also have creatures like Hitmonlee, who literally is the most unnatural and ungrounded creature in gen 1. Go one, defend it.
>inb4 it's a martial artist

Tell me what fricking animal Hitmonlee is, anon.

Jacky chan

it's actually Bruce lee, and he's a bug too. they're both Chinese

especially arcus.

yeah the only magnet that exists right

so other magnets exist? ok im glad we agree then

neither are snow or icicles

>Tell me where that happens in nature
sure as soon as you tell me where I said that a design must be used from something that happens in nature

magnemite is not a machine, magnemite isnt used for a specific function or task on its own. your thinking is so small and simple that you literally think because something is made of metal, it must be a machine lmao

if that's your interpretation, thats fine but magnets are still found in the natural world

this'll be the 3rd time I have to reiterate for your poor ESL brain:
porygon's design is inspired from the natural world. it looks like a bird or a duck, that's the standard the Gen1 set. I did not say porygon is natural or it's lore is found in the natural world either

the lore implications or origins are irrelevant to this standard. i'm not sure how much more simple and clear I can make it than that. if you can't understand these words there's no point in me trying to explain it anymore

if i have to repeat such a simple concept 3 times, what else is it other than ESL at best? I should have just gone with my hunch and knew I was talking to someone with abject moronation from the start.
>And your cope for voltorb and electrode is 'pokeballs exist in the pokemon world, so they should too', conflicting with your 'no lore allowed' explanations
what other examples are there to pokemon being inspired by the natural OF pokemon thats unique to it? any new dogshit pokemon dont have inspirations from the pokemon world that's unique to it?
EVEN if that's not enough. a colored sphere isn't a violation of things that are inspired from the natural world
>Get fricked, you fricking 10 year old
genuinely upset holy shit rofl

it looks cool but it's actually a shit pokemon

>porygon's design is inspired from the natural world.
the bread dog in the OP is based off a dog
what is clefairy? fairies aren't real. or jigglypuff? defend those with terminology that does not apply to bread dog pomemon or keys pokemon

so you admit defeat that you cannot describe the design difference between bread dog and some shit like geodude?

yes yeast exists. Just like in your mom's pussy

Dogs can be found in nature. Or so I'm told

the Japanese are obsessed with food.
and so am I

>the dog largely resembles something thats also VERY unlike something from the natural world?
explain why you made this sub 80 IQ statement. it is a dog made of food
>while clefairy and jigglypuff just largely resemble some small animal (something from the nature world) exaggerated in chibi form
say the animal. hint: it's not a cat or rodent.

Cause it's a new gen object mon.

what the frick is a magnet

That you know of.

That's not arceus, it's scarlet and violet. Arceus but worse.

I love how the Raidon is then sleeping beside her. YJK.

Arven's story is the best story in all of Pokemon, and the saddest. I want to hug him and cuddle him and tell him it will be okay.

Mega evo is superior and you know it.

there's 5 things I check for before I leave my house. my phone, keys, and my dick and balls

scyther is still useful with eviolite or baton pass, so that nice.

>the names toboggan
>Mantis toboggan