What's next, RE1 remake or RE5 remake?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
What's next, RE1 remake or RE5 remake?
What's next, RE1 remake or RE5 remake?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
huh? the re1 remake is literally the best remake created
why would they remake at perfect remake?
Because we want to play that awesome game again in a different way, same reason that remake exists
is this b8
You'd be pretty ignorant to think it is bait. RE1 is a perfect choice for a re-remake.
Because gamers love nothing more than buying the same games over and over.
Re4 remake is nothing like the original you stupid fricking c**t.
Why so pissy, anon? Did you feel personally called out?
Its nothing like the original? How moronic are YOU? Many gamers people b***h when its not similar enough. Now YOU say its nothing like the original? Then why even make it if it is so different?
they need another goyslop cashgrab for fornite Dabbers and RE4 babbies
Same reason they demade re4 despite the original being perfect.
>huh? the re1 remake is literally the best remake created
it's not cause RE1 sucks.
I want to play remade RE1 with multiple STARS members usable at once, normal inventory, normal gameplay, etc
resident evil was bad and regressive when it came out, you will never change my opinion, had already been playing quake online for a year, moving at the speed of light and rocket jumping over people to stuff a grenade in their mouth. tank controls and set camera angles felt like returning to the literal stone age
RE1 was also not influential, as this is the list of games RE1/2 influenced
>Dino Crisis
>Silent Hill (sort of)
Half of this fandom is low IQ, so they'll gladly spend their money on things again. Klaus is overjoyed, the sheep are sheeping.
Remake it again.
re1 remake is older than og re4
tank controls bad
>Sold more than bloodborne in two days
kek
so did FF7R and the latest sales milestone for it is 5 million over 2 years ago
This one is actually good and a complete game though.
thing is you have people screeching how great the games are in both cases while not really actually talking about it
This outsold FF7 Remake too. As it should have.
>This outsold FF7 Remake
proof?
yes and no
FF7 Remake sold 3.5 million in THREE days, but was only on PS4 at the time
RE4 Remake sold 3 million in TWO days, but it's on every platform
while it did outsell by the time it got to the third day, it's also got a much bigger market, so hard to compare
both are very impressive though
I asked for proof, not another claim without anything to back it up
Which shows that Bloodborne gays only say it's the best to feel special.
Dark Souls III sold more than 10 million copies and contrarians here hate it even though it is basically the same game as BB, better in many aspects.
pretty much
>A game is only good if it sells well
Jesus, you fricks will make any argument just to be different
>multiplatform game sells better than an exclusive
Aren't you a bright lad?
i want them to make a new resident evil similar to 4.
That was 8, anon.
It was supposed to be but it was a rushed mess
Not even close, especially with House Beneviento slowing the came to an absolute crawl.
I actually think this could work
Make a "Midquel" about Wesker. Have it play very similarly to RE4R
playing as Wesker would be kino
they could add a minigame like GoW where you press buttons and sex a woman and thats how created jake
I'd love to see an anthology game that focuses on characters between RE3 and RE5. Like 5 or so 2-3 hour campaigns that focuses on Chris, Jill, Leon, Claire, Ada, and Wesker. There is an original section in Umbrella Chronicles where they invade Umbrella Russia that could be turned into a cool campaign.
>anthology game
So you want another RE6? Miss me with that gay shit. I want another classic RE game.
Fricking this holy shit
You've milked your old games three fricking times, SURELY by now you're built up the courage to make the same game for a 4th time but not copying a better capcom's homework
I want a new Leon adventure for RE9. Leon/Chris campaign for optimum fun.
strange that pairing hasn't happened yet in a video game
RE9 in 2024
REREmake in 2026
RE5make without the piss filter. Literally RE5 and Far cry 2 look better without them.
>REREmake in 2026
Why?
>Why?
30th anniversary of Resident Evil
March 22nd, 1996 is RE1's release date.
Feels like a fitting date for a remake of the game.
I guess going by the 30th anniversary angle but do we really need a second remake of 1/a remake of a remake on the RE engine.
I agree that it's an unnecessary remake. I felt the same way about RE4. But it's a relatively small game to make and could probably be shat out in a year/year and a half to make a decent chunk of change.
>But it's a relatively small game to make and could probably be shat out in a year/year and a half to make a decent chunk of change.
I now understand what re4 gays feel. God I hope that a RE1Remake Remake doesn't get the RE3remake treatment.
A less cynical perspective on it is that remaking RE5 without remaking RE1 feels weird because the stories are so connected. If gives them the opportunity to expand on the Wesker/Spencer/MIrander stuff as well.
Capcom and even Mikami back before he left stated that he wanted a "Remake of the REMAKE" due to RE0 and that the game would work perfectly with modern RE gameplay.
And there is a ton of fan remakes even in fricking doom proving this right.
Does no one remember that the entire capcom schedule leaked years ago?
its meaningless, corporations pivot on stuff like this in a two week period
Basically nothing on that list is accurate besides RE4R and SF6 and even those don't have their release date remotely correct.
Outrage never happened. Dragon's Dogma 2 only started development last year. No new Megaman games announced besides a re-release. RE Outrage never happened. RE Apocalypse hasn't been announced despite apparently coming out this year. Etc, etc.
guarantee you capcom cancelled several projects due to genshin impact, and to chase it in some way
>Dragon's Dogma 2 only started development last year
it's presumably been in production since DMCV wrapped up and released, it was officially announced to be in production last year because it was DD's 10th anniversary and that's about the biggest news they could drop regarding the series
Still doesn't fit with a purported 2022 release date.
I'm just saying predicting an obvious RE4 Remake and a SF6 doesn't make a leaked schedule right.
And? None of those dates line up because of covid. I'm just pointing out that After DMCV wrapped up Itsuno mentioned he was working on his next project and unless there was something else he didn't want to talk about DD2 makes the most sense.
those projects are probably delayed, a schedule is tentative
>Dragon's Dogma 2 was supposed to release a whole 6 months before RE4
>HUNK game
Holy shit please.
Capcom insider here:
OUTBREAK in 2025
new RE8 village (not castle) style 3rd person, more emphasis on exploration and puzzles would be great
Why do gamers keep on buying these remakes and remasters? Are new games just not cutting it no more?
RE2/3 arguably needed a remake.
4 was remade because it'll make Capcom 10 billion dollars.
>RE2/3 arguably needed a remake.
No they did not
I disagree.
They did. And they made 2 even better. Way more challenging.
>no A and B scenarios
>no ada x leon romance
>botched final Mr. X boss fight
>less forms for William Birkin
>no spiders
>sewers made even shorter when it was already short to begin with
>labs even got cut down
>no crows
Frick off. I ain't even going to get into how they botched 3.
>Leon x ada
The two literally kiss.
But besides that, I agree. These remakes are pretty good, but they fall when you compare them to the originals.
Easy source of money for Capcom though, and there's nothing else to play so I'm sure the modern gamer will continue to buy them.
It's going to be funny to see them remake 2 yet again in my life cycle.
What amazes me is how hesitant they were to remake RE2. Now they can't fricking stop remaking these games.
>demake 2
>challenging
Games nowadays have dropped a lot in quality and people can't throw money around like it's candy anymore, so buying a remake makes more sense because you already have a vague idea of what to expect from it, making it a more worthy option to spend money on.
Dino Crisis Remake
this is what I want
instead we get exoprimal...
RE3R was good, Black person.
I just want to take the time to say it really impresses me just how many different ways the raptors are scripted to “follow” the player by going from one room to the next if the player conditionally leaves a certain gate or access way unlocked or locked or traverses a certain number of rooms a certain way. There’s like 3 different ways the very first raptor can wind up interacting with the player, either by being fought in the chainlink fence area, being brought to the starting room, or being run from until it can’t pursue you anymore. It’s very impressive for the time.
Remake 6
RE9
Hopefully Code Veronica because it is by far the one game remaining that badly needs some kind of update.
RE5 they should just avoid for a while due to the bullshit involving Africans.
They cant remake code veronica without MASSIVE changes and that could make people angry, RE0 and RE5 are better candidates
this makes no sense at all, very few people hold CV in high esteem, which is the entire point to it needing a remake the most
this, nobody cares about CV, it's seen as capcom stumbling around drunkenly with the RE brand not having any idea what to do
Yeah who the frick is going to be mad at any changes to CV? That game sucks ass and is unironically worse than 6. 0 and CV are the absolute worst games in the series.
RE1 has already been done
Honestly CV needs it more than anything
CV, definitely needs a remake. But I don't know how in 2023 nuCapcom will handle having one of the villans being a troony. Same with RE5, and shooting black people.
He's not really a troony. He just has a weird split personality.
>another idiot calling him troony
there is no troony in CV you moron he just missed his sister so much he impersonated her at times
Apparently the post credits teases 5.
Yuck. 5 was supposed to be different from the og games and 4. Trying to give it the re2make treatment will just make an inferior game. 5 was already a modern game.
There is actually a point in retconning 5 though to give Wesker a fitting story arc. Could ressurect him for re9.
True, but I think his story is linked to Chris and Jill.
Is Capcom willing to keep continuing with the old cast?
Yeah, the same way they use chris now. You have new entries or arcs that focus on new undeveloped characters. Then you have fanservice Chris and Wesker and the rest of the old surviving cast happening in the background or dlc.
Yes we see the reflection of Excella in Wesker's glasses. At first I thought the next REmake would be 1, but that sounds like a teaser for 5.
I'm surprised anon. 1 seems like an obvious money maker and would be a lot easier to do than the vast open spaces of Africa.
Maybe they consider it too much of a sacred goose and want to do it right.
>vast open spaces of Africa
Africa has slums and cities too.
But they clash with the aesthetic of village and 4 (Spain). It's like making an re game set in Iraq. They can still, and will, re use assets but it's harder.
are you a legitimate dumdum, do you think if Capcom make another Devil May Cry game they will limit the scope of the team by saying "please make it easier for us to reuse assets, that means no deserts or anything gomen-ne, gomenasai".
i get what youre saying but Africa not looking like Spain or Romania is literally irrelevant
No, but it's just more thematic sense for 1 as it was originally a PS1 title while re5 was a 360/PS3 title. There's more to modernize than re5. It just feels like a cashgrab to go for re5 instead of something like code Veronica.
1 will be done first because they already have the assets for it. Between RE7, RE8 and RE4, they could build out the mansion and surrounded area of REmake easily.
remake 0 with optional co op, a proper storage, and third person and it'll be a passable game for once
Just remove Billy completely and have it be about Rebecca or remove Rebecca and have it be about billy since she never bothers to mention in 1 that she navigated an entire separate fricking mansion by herself which would’ve been kind of important.
They could also make Enrico protagonist, he was hanging around the same area. Or Wesker and Birkin, instant profit.
Also make the villain more entertaining and have Billy be an actual serial killer
I'm legitimately worried about political influence on 5
Part 5 already got censored back then. So it being censored yet again would be a fitting tribute to that goyslop trash anyways.
Complete reimagining of RE5 in the tone REmake 2/7 would be neat. Keep Sheva, Africa and Wesker, but get creative otherwise.
the best thing about 5 is Wesker getting ridiculous in the last third
I don't mind them making the first half kind of serious but it needs to go full moron at the end
Yeah, sure, but there's something about the tone that Resident Evil lost as it progressed. It's not necessarily the weird goofy supervillain shit, but that the world that fantasy elements start wrecking didn't feel as believable anymore. Big part of what I like in Resident Evil games is when the environments feel lived in, rather than just some random videogame action tunnels that you speed through. RE5 original feels more like a Gears of War than RE game. You need to try to push both the bio-horror craziness AND immersiveness as far as you can, together, to make it work.
that's why village was so good
i like the design intent of 7/8 more than the remakes, i want to see both combined
>i like the design intent of 7/8 more than the remakes
I genuinely can't tell you how much I fricking adore 7 and 8's styling each segment of the games after specific horror tropes. The execution of them varies greatly but it's such a fun idea that I really wish they keep up with going forward.
the multi segmented approach to RE8 was a huge, huge win for me, but I also felt disappointed that the first part was classic RE then the game just wasn't anymore, it felt like a big bait and switch
I want classic RE with real puzzles and shit, with real gameplay.
Is Winters DLC good? it seemed like everyone was chomping at the bit for village dlc and then i never saw it discussed
>Is Winters DLC good? it seemed like everyone was chomping at the bit for village dlc and then i never saw it discussed
Everyone wanted a Village DLC that expanded on the role of the Villagers, Mommy D and Heisenberg. Instead we got an asset flip that is more Alice: Madness Returns than Resident Evil. I didn't hate it and it does have some fun parts but you can tell they had 0 intention of making it before Village was a big success and it was made in the shortest amount of time/least amount of effort possible.
I'd only pick up the Village DLC if you're curious about the (admittedly janky) third person mode.
Winters DLC sucks, the Rose campaign has you just running through the map. You get like two guns, and don't even use them during the forced stealth segments, which are like half of the 1.5 hour game. Has some extra lore and neat ideas but it's rushed and lame.
Haven't tried the Mercenaries stuff but it's just new characters, 8 mercs sucks and there's no changing that.
>. You get like two guns, and don't even use them during the forced stealth segments, which are like half of the 1.5 hour game
groan. thanks.
Do we finally get to fight ghosts in RE9 as Rose?
I hated her dlc, no Duke backstory. No new areas in the castle to explore.
Yeah I feel you. If we get a game that uses the horror trope per segment method of 7 and 8 but still grounds all of them in typical Resident Evil exploration and puzzle solving then you could potential for the perfect RE game for me.
>Is Winters DLC good?
No. The first half of it is member berries of the castle section of the base game and the second section is the Beneviento house again except stretched far too long. The boss fights are also recycled and the bosses have way too much health.
I think out of principle they should never touch that game again. They made the best tank control game they possibly could and like it or not, tanks controls is a part of the history and they should just leave the first game as is as a reminder of where the game came from.
I agree with this guy
West Africans should not have to deal with white aryan men
In fact, no west Africans should come to America and no whites should go to west Africa, after all we’d just abuse them
So all the west Africans can stay there, they don’t need the white men at all and frankly, they don’t need to come here to be abused
why is tribal stuff racist?
are there no aboriginal tribes in Africa? the frick are they talking about
Your guess is as good as mine. I can't make heads or tails of their preformative bullshit.
It should be full on Heart of Darkness tier
A descent into madness for Chris as he pursues this obsessed moron in a trenchcoat
Thats what his campaign in RE 6 was
>lose the awful, racist tribal shit
I’d love to hear this guys thoughts on Black Panther
I think the game should start at day and they could implement the hallucination mechanics they originally talked about in 4.5.
But I like the idea of the shantytown at night. Could be really spooky.
This but only with Chris playable. Completely remove Sheva from the narrative and add segments with Jill under Wesker's control. And it would be a good game.
>make lost in nightmares the opening chapter
>don't kill off wesker
probably the only good suggestions
>For a remake, I think we should make a different game
I wish people like him would kill themselves, be reborn, and then kill themselves again.
I would actually laugh astoundingly if they remade 5 and 6 to not be autistic fast pace shooters, imagine the seething that would over take this board?
I hope they add coop I suspect they won't but I hope they do
RE3 REREmake?
The REmakes literally prints money for Capcom so there's really no reason not to remake ALL the games in the RE Engine, and basically clean up the canon where necessary.
It does till it doesn't, but that's okay since it continues to prove that Capcom is creatively bankrupt when it comes to furthering RE as a series.
Sure but you aren't providing a good enough reason that Capcom shouldn't just make easy money when people are going to buy them. And it's not like it's completely remakes 100% of the time. I am betting they'll do RE9 before another remake.
>you aren't providing a good enough reason that Capcom shouldn't just make easy money
Village is the proof. Barely anyone is happy with it, everyone is upset that either it's FPS RE again or that the Chris section is out of place.
>I am betting they'll do RE9 before another remake
They kind of have to, they really can't keep remaking games and expecting the fanbase to grow or even maintain at this rate
>Village is the proof.
It still sold and reviewed well, but until I see the same precarious dropoff with RE5-6 happen with the newest games, it doesn't make much sense for Capcom to not do what they are doing. And you already could see improvements those criticisms when you play the remakes right after the next numbered entry, like how RE4 has addressed some of RE8's criticisms.
>the same precarious dropoff with RE5-6
Those are still the best selling games of the series to this day. For the most part we're in the dropoff now as sales have been slowly dipping ever since they peaked with RE5.
>RE4 has addressed some of RE8's criticisms
It did nothing of the sort, it's a remake of an existing game, not an entirely new one. Just being a third person game is automatically going to make it more desirable for a lot of fans.
RE6 reviewed badly, PC was where it got the highest scores and it still didn't get above 70. That was what prompted the change. Yeah, it sold well but Capcom for all its faults does take criticism seriously. If they hadn't done that for RE7 and gone with their Leon excursion for that entry which we saw in pictures a while back, they would've killed the IP.
>RE6 reviewed badly, PC was where it got the highest scores and it still didn't get above 70. That was what prompted the change
And nothing they've produced afterwards has matched its sales. It's almost as if it's a vocal minority causing Capcom to take missteps when it comes to RE and so far sales just seem to gradually get lower and lower.
>If they hadn't done that for RE7 and gone with their Leon excursion for that entry which we saw in pictures a while back, they would've killed the IP
Absolute speculation and arguably disproven by sales numbers and the hype for RE4R
>And nothing they've produced afterwards has matched its sales.
those are console-only sales figures you're looking at. village smashed all re-related records completely
homie did you miss the big "PC" underneath the all the PS and XB to the right of the release year? If you got more accurate numbers then post them.
Disingenuous comparison. No shit an older game has sold more because it's had more time for people to buy it. If you want a real comparison compare how much RE6 sold in a few year period after its release and compare it to modern titles.
>No shit an older game has sold more because it's had more time for people to buy it
Meanwhile RE2R outsold the original and RE5 outsold everything before it, even the critically acclaimed RE4. And how do you explain Elden Ring completely BTFO of every soulsborne game before it?
What the frick are you talking about with this stupid whataboutism?
I'm not the one who made a claim that "No shit an older game has sold more because it's had more time for people to buy it" while ignoring many instances of newer games blowing up and outselling previous entries in their own series
You're saying that me pointing out that you ignored a variable that makes the comparison disingenuous means I was implying that variable is the only one that mattered. You are a fricking moron. Genuine 0 IQ moron.
>ignored a variable
You can't always expect a game that's older to have more sales, in fact it's the inverse because the video games market is bigger than it was a decade ago and even more so when you look back 20+ years. At one time FF7 was the highest selling video game ever but compare that to now and GTA5 has outsold it about 15 times over. It's a flawed perception.
I never said RE6 sold more ONLY because it was older. I said you were arguing in bad faith to not bring it up as if it wasn't an important variable.
And once again I'll bring up the example of Elden Ring because that game sold 16 million copies in 6 months. It's clearly feasible for a game to completely eclipse a previous entry in its series in a short amount of time IF the demand is there. RE7 has had 6 years to catch up to RE5 and it's STILL several million behind.
See
you are genuinely brain damaged and cannot follow simple logic despite me explaining it to you as if you were 5 so I'll leave this argument here.
I'm saying your excuse for less sales is pointless because many other games have overcome this "earlier released game" barrier so it's practically a non-factor unless you're trying to argue that RE7 is either only as good or less than the two games that preceded it.
Black person I never once said you were wrong about RE6. I said you were arguing in bad faith. Which you were, or rather are.
>you were arguing in bad faith
how is it bad faith when I have clear examples of games being released earlier being completely overshadowing the sales of a subsequent release? If anything you're the one arguing in bad faith because the only way you can not entirely lose face is to hold on to an excuse that has already been demonstrated as questionable at best.
>how is it bad faith when I have clear examples of games being released earlier being completely overshadowing the sales of a subsequent release?
Because a game being popular and selling well quickly doesn't mean that time isn't a factor for sales you stupid fricking c**t. How in the absolute frick can you even think that is an argument?
>If anything you're the one arguing in bad faith because the only way you can not entirely lose face is to hold on to an excuse that has already been demonstrated as questionable at best.
Again, you're arguing against a strawman here because I'm not trying to counter your actual points here. That shit's irrelevant and I don't care about it. I'm only criticising you for being disingenuous. Which again, you most definitely are.
>a game being popular and selling well quickly doesn't mean that time isn't a factor for sales
So when does it not become a factor then? Six months? One year? A decade? If you're going to argue this point then you're going to have to define the period of time where it is and isn't acceptable. If you can't objectively determine that then that criteria is worse than pointless, it's biased.
>you're arguing against a strawman here
I'm not the one who started crying about bad faith
>So when does it not become a factor then?
What? Never. It never stops being a factor, what the frick are you talking about? I'm not even being hyperbolic here you might be the stupidest person I've interacted with on Ganker all year and that's saying something. You're genuinely at a level of stupid that I can't even think of a rebuttal becuase you aren't even capable of understanding simple logic. I feel like I'm talking to a child.
I feel like he's just baiting, you're better off ignoring him.
>It never stops being a factor
So explain how RE5 and RE6 BTFO of previous entries in sales but so far RE7 and RE8 have not
It's almost as release time isn't anywhere near important once you get past a few years, which RE7 clearly is at this point
The fricked up thing is knowing RE7 remake will happen at some point
literally it won't
No it won't. But if it does, we'll all have died of old age.
more fricked gays fricking your child, western sodomite
and where are you from?
Your mum
re0 remake only if they get kittens as rebecca
re0 remake only if they get actual kittens as rebecca
Just do Code Veronica and Zero then no more remakes
Why DID they start with 2? If it was to pay respect to the original REmake they probably won't ever do it.
Because pretty much everyone agrees REmake is perfect and shouldn't be touched.
Yeah if they didn't do it before 2 I don't see them doing it now. REmake is too good anyway so there isn't really anything they could improve upon it. Only way they could do it is have it be literally the exact same but with 3rd person cause to be honest I'm not really a fixed camera angle purist despite REmake being my favourite RE game.
RE devs wanted to make RE2make right after REmake, but Mikami said shut the frick up and get back to work on RE4 and then in 2015 Capcom decided to greenlight a bunch of different projects with RE2make finally getting the go ahead and that would've been it, but RE2make sold 12 million copies and now here we are with RE4make that teases RE5make at the end.
why so ass fat?
How is silent hill 2 remake going to even be able to compete against re4 remake when it was THAT good?
>How is silent hill 2 remake going to even be able to compete
When everyone who actually gives a shit about SH2 is actively trying to pretend you're not happening, I don't think you can.
You already know the answer. I really want SH2 to be good, but the fact that the game is developed with UE by a studio that has a correct horror walking sim and an SH like that is just mid, I'm not very confident about this one. We'll see.
People were skeptical about RE4 too and it turned out to be pretty good. The biggest hurdle for SH2 is that Blooberteam has made nothing but mediocre games whereas Capcom's RD2 has been hitting it out of the park first with RE2 and then with RE4.
I am going into it with an open mind.
that wouldn't be an issue if the p*les haven't openly state that they will make it for ''modern audience'' friendly shit.
These are two very different levels of skepticism.
People were worried Capcom MIGHT frick up and drop the ball but it was more than likely going to be at least good.
SH2 remake being good would actually be a fricking miracle at this point since Bloober hasn't made a great game ever and Konami is Konami.
It will be goty.
Honestly I am more hyped for this than dead space or re4. This looks like it might actually improve upon the original and not be a demake like dead space and re4 which were just graphical updates with worse design choices.
Like, the gameplay of sh2 was pretty mediocore with the town being mostly empty. I wish they would give you more incentive to explore the place than just gunning from a to b. Maybe they will make pyramid head like Mr x since they said they're taking inspiration from re2make.
>excited for poolish sjw goyslop
>shitting on perfect remake of RE4
pottery
>rereRE1
>1 Gozillion sales
>Skyrim MYTH edition in 2025
>Cyberpunk 2077 EX edition
>God of War: God of War edition
>TLOU PC
>FF XV Memories
I'm loosing my mind
I'm going insane
I hate video game consumers
ReR5 will be singleplayer with 2 scenariors. Chris and Sheva have their own story path.
Bosses and enemies will be cut and censored. The black enemies with spear and straw dresses will be cut because of muh racism. Death scenes will be censored and even more tame. Wesker will not die in the end. Volcano and boulder punch along with the plane crash will be cut and changed.
The merchenaries will be paid DLC along with the online battle DLC.
go back to tears of goyslop tendie
PE remake never ever
With the current state of Squenix, it may be better
Oh look, it's the prequel to The 3rd Birthday.
DRAGON'S DOGMA 2 MAH NIGGGGGAAAAAA
capcom has been knocking it out of the fricking park lately
>3 million
I wonder why
https://twitter.com/mask_bastard/status/1641127266376728579
How much shit will get cut from this DEmake?
>no spiders
>no cave
>no crows
>no neptune
>no chimeras
>no multiple endings
Cant wait.
(you)
Seething lil zoom zooms.
>projecting
its ok buddy we are all frens here
I'm older than you AND I fricked your mum.
can you beat your kid please? he needs some respect for elders.
You're my kid now, on account of the mum fricking.
Bend over.
no
How much did RE4 cut?
JJ and U3?
U3 which will likely be in Separate Ways
You gotta get more creative with the doomposting, something like they're gonna merge Chris and Jill into one storyline similar to Jill and Carlos in RE3make.
Code Veronica remake
RE1 remake is already good, I'd rather have an RE5 remake.
People who say they would remove the tribal outfit from RE5make are not thinking from the right angle... taking away a sexy outfit for a BLACK woman is empowering is it? so they can leave it there
I bought RE6 twice and I have never beat it. It is a piece of junk.
you meant its a piece of Hunk right anon?
remake 1 this
remake 5 that
b***h when are we getting an RE6 remake that overhauls the campaigns so they're not a slog while upgrading the combat system?
I'd rather they ignore RE6 entirely.
I don't care as long as we get more RE and nothing as disappointing and bad as RE3make.
re6 is fine as long as you pretend it isn't resident evil
>RE7 came out in 2017
>RE8 came out in 2021
>morons mad they make remakes
Do you want yearly RE releases like COD and Assassin creed?
I don't understand the outrage about remakes.
Code Veronica is their perfect choice. Was locked on a dead system and the real RE3
I want to see a more "immersive sim" spinoff game about some nobody test subject trying to escape a huge secret umbrella facility and you can use different research experiments to upgrade yourself with mutations. Something similar to Prey 2017 where the more mutations you get the less human you become that affects all kinds of stuff like automated security and endings.
5 will never be remade for obvious reasons. Probably 1 (again), 0, or CV (this time with Alfred rewritten to not be a crossdresser)
1 remake, CV and then 5. My dad works at Lowes.
Remake Zero instead
That game kind of sucked but the idea is cool
Rebuild it from the ground up and make it co-op, it deserves another go.
>Rebuild it from the ground up and make it co-op
You know what? I like this.
Do a subversion and remake RE0 with the RE5 co op, and then just make RE5 a single player game
Code Veronica and Gun Survivor is the only true answer.
>sells millions in days
wtf Ganker you said this game was shit and would flop
They proved they can make a great game. I was middling on RE8 but RE4R is fantastic. RE5 resolves a bunch of plot from RE1, so remaking RE5 will not make sense to the new audience. REmake 2 with the new gameplay is their best bet.
RE1R is the confident, smart choice. RE5 is the short sighted, cash grab choice. CVR is not going to happen. Nu-RE is too high profile to bank on a spin off that wasn't very well received.
>wasn't very well received
wrong
>Nu-RE is too high profile to bank on a spin off that wasn't very well received.
except the original game was well received but they fricked it up in the remake
>the original game was well received
It really wasn't. There was barely any buzz and most people considered it a step down from the previous two games.
>they fricked it up in the remake
Nah, it's fine. People cry about the clocktower being cut but the rest of the game has a great flow and the dodge is actually usable rather than something that just accidentally happens when you're trying to shoot something. Also Carlos is an exponentially better character in RE3make.
>It really wasn't. There was barely any buzz and most people considered it a step down from the previous two games.
literally the only thing people knew about RE was nemesis for fricking years
Nemmy being a meme does not mean the game was well received, in a lot of cases memes are born from games being bad.
nemesis wasn't a fricking "meme"
he was a popular character you moronic fricking zoomer holy shit
i liked Carlos in RE3make and the other umbrella mercs but other than that its sadly shit. its good for mindless fun though.
You speak like a zoomer who thinks he knows shit but clearly doesn't. Like the other guy said, 3 was so popular that's all people would talk about for years was Nemmy because he was so cool.
see
You still don't know shit because you weren't even around.
Actually I was, but since you're so insistent that I wasn't, how about you prove that.
No you weren't, zoomer.
so prove I wasn't
If you can't then we know not to listen to you anymore
>using current vernacular disqualifies a claim
no matter how you want to split hairs Nemesis was a meme by today's standards
or are you really going to claim that no one was making references to him going STARS MUWAAAHHHH all the time?
I can prove it just by the way you're typing and arguing. You failed.
So you didn't prove then, thanks for verifying.
>or are you really going to claim that no one was making references to him going STARS MUWAAAHHHH all the time?
how does that detract anything that I've said moron
That by today's standards he'd be considered a meme, we just never said that back then. It's like if we were discussing olde english but used modern day speech to express our ideas. If that's the only "proof" you have that I wasn't around in 1999 then you'd be completely wrong.
I wish they went back to the fixed camera for at least one game.
Imagine the GRAFIX.
Also, I feel like save rooms get shafted more and more these days. I miss when they were a huge part of the games.
Nah fixed camera angles don't really work in high budget games. I played tormented souls recently and it's a great game but it only really works as it does because it's a low budget indie game.
If they're going to remake 5, they better ditch the co-op bullshit and make it how it was originally intended, as a single player game.
So the options are this right?
RE1 Remake Remake
RE Code Veronica Remake
RE5 Remake
Its 100% one of those 3 correct? Or am I forgetting some other game?
Loop back around. RE1 Remake back to RE4 remake.
Why do Americans insist on being offended on behalf of other countries? Nobody in Africa gave a shit about RE5. Same with Ghost of Tsushima. Americans said it was racist but people in Japan said it wasnt racist.
america's only culture of their own is being offended and playing victim card
Its very irritating how much constant complaining they do.
Remakes... Isn't that a popular word these days?
>RE5make
CHRIIIIIS, TIME TO DIE CHRIS
RE0 Remake would be infinitely more interesting than either of those
I have never played CV. What makes it so bad? Worse than 6 is a bold statement so I'm just curious.