>when the manchild /misc/tard came to the realisation the western marketing arm actually believed the inclusivity angle the kiddy games pushed
Oh dear.... Did you just not pay attention for the last 10 years of your life before that statement or what?
>implying only the western arm believes this
lol Ishihara himself told them to make this statement. That's the only reason they were allowed to do so in the first place.
>Shadow Pokémon start making trouble around the region >Trainers fighting said shadow Pokémon are berated by a BLM/PETA like group, despite telling them ‘but they endanger my Pokémon’ or ‘they’re confused and dangerous’ but big media corporations always catch it on the news and spin the story to seem like they’re oppressing a neurodivergent group of Pokémon, trainers get arrested or embarrassed as a result >presidential endorsement for bad guys >turns out the evil group are manufacturing the shadow Pokémon drug and abusing them to establish equality so that on an eventful day they can overtake the government and steal all the healthy Pokémon to infect them for a stardust byproduct that shadow Pokémon foam at the mouth with >plan backfires, evil group is overrun by their own shadow Pokémon, country thrown into disarray >you enlist the help of box legendaries to restabalize them, arrest the evil group, and stop the abuse
Eh?
The unfortunate reality is that American moronation spreads everywhere eventually.
This is coming from someone who works in Japan and literally last week graded a writing project where a 15 y/o wrote about trans inclusion in a rural Japanese school.
The only thing western discourse of Japan seems to be consistent on is that every single japanese has the exact same opinion.
People can't seem to decide what those opinions are though.
The unfortunate reality is that American moronation spreads everywhere eventually.
This is coming from someone who works in Japan and literally last week graded a writing project where a 15 y/o wrote about trans inclusion in a rural Japanese school.
Tiktok was a fricking mistake
>The unfortunate reality is that American moronation spreads everywhere eventually.
Definitely.
I don't care for poltardation, but nah, frick BLM. It's not racism not /misc/ to point out that BLM are an actual real life evil team.
They're Team Plasma basically.
Supposedly doing a good thing because they think it's what's right when secretly the boss and their private cabal are just using them as a means to their own ends, in BLM's leader's case, buying an expensive house far away from other black folk.
Frick em.
only dumbasses actually think BLM is some organized organizaton. is there an organzation that labels itself as BLM? yes, and I'm sure it's indeed run by greedy bastards. but if you had a brain and even the tiniest amount of observational/critical thinking skills you'd be able to figure out that BLM doesn't extend much farther than a catchphrase used in support of a general political/social concept rather than a massive, organized group of people trying to dismantle a stability of the US.
here's a fun fact: only a small percentage of BLM protests even turned to any degree of violence, and yet every single example of BLM support is met with people angrily responding with "you guys are terrorists that want to destroy cities, we don't wanna hear it"
isn't that an interesting fact that is not at all indicative of any sort of deeper mass media manipulation?
>destroy cities in your name
whose name?
BLM the movement is not the same as BLM the organization, and using the catchphrase doesn't actually make any real indication on where your beliefs stand in relation to everyone else's, so what is denouncing them supposed to do?
besides, plenty of leftists and BLM supporters actually did denounce the violent raids, but obviously acknowledging their opinions doesn't fan the flames of culture wars and generate media profit the way that automatically labeling every BLM as a wannabe terrorist does
listen you seem like a nice guy so i'll give you a chance to reply in a way that isn't just deflection
i don't give that to just anyone you know so don't waste it
not sure how it is deflection
media factually manipulates public opinion in order to fuel outrage bait and prevent people from coming to a consensus that would damage the influence of people that benefit from the discourse.
I don't support violent protests, I openly stated my disagreement with violent protests while they were occurring, and I think the people that chimped out during the protest are a bunch of idiots. but I do think the ideas presented during the BLM movement have validity to them.
but nowadays I cannot state that I agree with any of their ideas without someone immediately accusing me of being a violent rioter that wants to destroy the country. and this is still in spite of the violent protests being only a small minority of total protests that were made over the issue. can you seriously tell me that there's no manipulation involved in that?
9 months ago
Anonymous
The entire point of BLM is to be controlled opposition, you absolute moron.
That's why the media fixates on the bad things they've done, and why there's no denouncing of the more radical elements.
It's all a psyop.
>destroy cities in your name
whose name?
BLM the movement is not the same as BLM the organization, and using the catchphrase doesn't actually make any real indication on where your beliefs stand in relation to everyone else's, so what is denouncing them supposed to do?
besides, plenty of leftists and BLM supporters actually did denounce the violent raids, but obviously acknowledging their opinions doesn't fan the flames of culture wars and generate media profit the way that automatically labeling every BLM as a wannabe terrorist does
How very convenient that there's "plenty" of nameless people who denounced the riots, publically, and didn't take it back when they got backlash for it.
Also that there's no real "organized" BLM but also no mention of how it was a completely naturally formed grassroots movement without ties to any superdoners or organizations either
I never said there wasn't an organized BLM
just that it does not entail anywhere near the entirety of people that agree with its general message, and that to claim as much is disingenuous
>only dumbasses actually think BLM is some organized organizaton. is there an organzation that labels itself as BLM? yes
Then BLM is an organization anon. The fact that other people use the phrase doesn't stop them to be so and people who criticize the BLM organization indeed do think "I'm sure it's indeed run by greedy bastards".
You're another case of not wanting to take a side.
>only a small percentage of BLM protests even turned to any degree of violence, and yet every single example of BLM support is met with people angrily responding with "you guys are terrorists that want to destroy cities, we don't wanna hear it"
Even assuming you're talking in good faith, that was the same thing we said when we were labeled nazis for not liking the female ghostbusters. Too late to pretend generelazations are bad.
>isn't that an interesting fact that is not at all indicative of any sort of deeper mass media manipulation?
Anon, the very fact that people "organize themselves" to protest for this cause already indicates media manipulation which you'll call a conspirancy theory.
>It's not racism not /misc/ to point out that BLM are an actual real life evil team.
That's /misc/ anon.
You don't like the fact you took a side but you already did.
>when the manchild /misc/tard came to the realisation the western marketing arm actually believed the inclusivity angle the kiddy games pushed
Oh dear.... Did you just not pay attention for the last 10 years of your life before that statement or what?
unreadable
>implying only the western arm believes this
lol Ishihara himself told them to make this statement. That's the only reason they were allowed to do so in the first place.
You seem really offended and upset that people clown on things you seem to care about.
/misc/ thread
How would Antifa/BLM work as an evil team in Pokemon? Hard Mode: No Team Plasma
>Shadow Pokémon start making trouble around the region
>Trainers fighting said shadow Pokémon are berated by a BLM/PETA like group, despite telling them ‘but they endanger my Pokémon’ or ‘they’re confused and dangerous’ but big media corporations always catch it on the news and spin the story to seem like they’re oppressing a neurodivergent group of Pokémon, trainers get arrested or embarrassed as a result
>presidential endorsement for bad guys
>turns out the evil group are manufacturing the shadow Pokémon drug and abusing them to establish equality so that on an eventful day they can overtake the government and steal all the healthy Pokémon to infect them for a stardust byproduct that shadow Pokémon foam at the mouth with
>plan backfires, evil group is overrun by their own shadow Pokémon, country thrown into disarray
>you enlist the help of box legendaries to restabalize them, arrest the evil group, and stop the abuse
Eh?
>restabalize
good morning sir
They said "in Pokemon", anon. That'd fit for some edgy romhack but not the series proper.
>Shadow Pokemon
They'd never bring them back. You're lucky they show up in Go at all.
Team Skull but even more homosexual
I thought the japanese were xenophobes and hated foreigners?
The unfortunate reality is that American moronation spreads everywhere eventually.
This is coming from someone who works in Japan and literally last week graded a writing project where a 15 y/o wrote about trans inclusion in a rural Japanese school.
Tiktok was a fricking mistake
The only thing western discourse of Japan seems to be consistent on is that every single japanese has the exact same opinion.
People can't seem to decide what those opinions are though.
>The unfortunate reality is that American moronation spreads everywhere eventually.
Definitely.
I don't care for poltardation, but nah, frick BLM. It's not racism not /misc/ to point out that BLM are an actual real life evil team.
They're Team Plasma basically.
Supposedly doing a good thing because they think it's what's right when secretly the boss and their private cabal are just using them as a means to their own ends, in BLM's leader's case, buying an expensive house far away from other black folk.
Frick em.
only dumbasses actually think BLM is some organized organizaton. is there an organzation that labels itself as BLM? yes, and I'm sure it's indeed run by greedy bastards. but if you had a brain and even the tiniest amount of observational/critical thinking skills you'd be able to figure out that BLM doesn't extend much farther than a catchphrase used in support of a general political/social concept rather than a massive, organized group of people trying to dismantle a stability of the US.
here's a fun fact: only a small percentage of BLM protests even turned to any degree of violence, and yet every single example of BLM support is met with people angrily responding with "you guys are terrorists that want to destroy cities, we don't wanna hear it"
isn't that an interesting fact that is not at all indicative of any sort of deeper mass media manipulation?
>people destroy cities in your name
>don't denounce them
gee i wonder why people think those things
>destroy cities in your name
whose name?
BLM the movement is not the same as BLM the organization, and using the catchphrase doesn't actually make any real indication on where your beliefs stand in relation to everyone else's, so what is denouncing them supposed to do?
besides, plenty of leftists and BLM supporters actually did denounce the violent raids, but obviously acknowledging their opinions doesn't fan the flames of culture wars and generate media profit the way that automatically labeling every BLM as a wannabe terrorist does
listen you seem like a nice guy so i'll give you a chance to reply in a way that isn't just deflection
i don't give that to just anyone you know so don't waste it
not sure how it is deflection
media factually manipulates public opinion in order to fuel outrage bait and prevent people from coming to a consensus that would damage the influence of people that benefit from the discourse.
I don't support violent protests, I openly stated my disagreement with violent protests while they were occurring, and I think the people that chimped out during the protest are a bunch of idiots. but I do think the ideas presented during the BLM movement have validity to them.
but nowadays I cannot state that I agree with any of their ideas without someone immediately accusing me of being a violent rioter that wants to destroy the country. and this is still in spite of the violent protests being only a small minority of total protests that were made over the issue. can you seriously tell me that there's no manipulation involved in that?
The entire point of BLM is to be controlled opposition, you absolute moron.
That's why the media fixates on the bad things they've done, and why there's no denouncing of the more radical elements.
It's all a psyop.
It sure is convenient that there's absolutely not an organization but you can keep organizing protests. It's just a slogan guys we swear.
How very convenient that there's "plenty" of nameless people who denounced the riots, publically, and didn't take it back when they got backlash for it.
Also that there's no real "organized" BLM but also no mention of how it was a completely naturally formed grassroots movement without ties to any superdoners or organizations either
I never said there wasn't an organized BLM
just that it does not entail anywhere near the entirety of people that agree with its general message, and that to claim as much is disingenuous
>only dumbasses actually think BLM is some organized organizaton. is there an organzation that labels itself as BLM? yes
Then BLM is an organization anon. The fact that other people use the phrase doesn't stop them to be so and people who criticize the BLM organization indeed do think "I'm sure it's indeed run by greedy bastards".
You're another case of not wanting to take a side.
>only a small percentage of BLM protests even turned to any degree of violence, and yet every single example of BLM support is met with people angrily responding with "you guys are terrorists that want to destroy cities, we don't wanna hear it"
Even assuming you're talking in good faith, that was the same thing we said when we were labeled nazis for not liking the female ghostbusters. Too late to pretend generelazations are bad.
>isn't that an interesting fact that is not at all indicative of any sort of deeper mass media manipulation?
Anon, the very fact that people "organize themselves" to protest for this cause already indicates media manipulation which you'll call a conspirancy theory.
And Kill the Boer is just a song.
No...
More...
LIES!
>It's not racism not /misc/ to point out that BLM are an actual real life evil team.
That's /misc/ anon.
You don't like the fact you took a side but you already did.