whatever amd releases that year. nvidia will have long since left graphics by then and become an ai only chip house. intel might still be in the running, they're a bit of a wildcard.
Seems like it's more reasonable to expect the pro to be 6800XT level, which is firmly upper middle of the pack if you compare all currently released GPU's. It'll easily handle 4k/60 high settings upscaled from 1440p. Anyone claiming native 4k is a dumb snoy
I just got a RX 6750 XT. should be better than a piss5 and at least on par with a piss6 but that's ridiculous there's no way the piss5 is being retired yet it just released wtf sony you idiot homosexual motherfrickers god damn.
this shocks me. if you look at the exclusive PS5 games list, its been 11 games for 3 years. the entire consoles life, its had 11, and never a single game more
>PS3 ~ 7800 GTX(high-end card released a year before the console) >PS4 ~ HD 7850(mid-range card released a year before the console) >PS5 ~ RX 5700 XT(mid-range card released a year before the console) >The PS6 will come out in 2026 or 2027, and the RTX 50 series has been delayed to 2025
Therefore, the PS6 will be equivalent to the 5070, which will likely be as powerful as the 4080
>Which GPU do you think is(or will be) the first one to compete with a PS6?
A 2070 is better than a PS5, so I'm gonna go ahead and assume that any of the 30 and 40 series cards are already better than whatever the PS6 will be. Sony and MS aren't as bad as Nintendo, but their consoles are still outdated horseshit on the day of release too.
Has thousands more games.
>750 Ti
Roughly equal to a PS4.
Has thousands more games.
Touché.
Thousands more than 0 is still 0
>Thousands more than 0 is still 0
Mutt hours.
>Thousands more than 0 is still 0
moron
>Applying a multiplication rule to addition
Either underage, moronic, or both. Go back to elementary school.
Battlemage.
Any GPU released within the last three years, minimum.
whatever mid-range gpus that get released in the same year
Whatever next year's top spec GPU is.
Remember, in raster a PS5 is about a 1080 ti.
That came ~4 years after a PS4.
>consoles get a 5090
>they still somehow struggle to run games at 1080p 60 fps
Nah it'll be 1080p upscaled to 8K with AI
Nah it would be more like a 5080.
All the 3090 and 4090 are is Nvidia memeing their Titan series into flagship cards and keeping them the same price.
whatever amd releases that year. nvidia will have long since left graphics by then and become an ai only chip house. intel might still be in the running, they're a bit of a wildcard.
The 4090 is without a doubt faster than the PS6 will be. A 1080 ti is still faster than a PS5.
*Roughly on par.
no lol, PS5 is more like a 5700 xt
Seems like it's more reasonable to expect the pro to be 6800XT level, which is firmly upper middle of the pack if you compare all currently released GPU's. It'll easily handle 4k/60 high settings upscaled from 1440p. Anyone claiming native 4k is a dumb snoy
It's going to be that gimped Chinese 7900xt.
But the PS5 is upscaling from like 640p.
I'd say 6900xt level since these gpu are getting lower and lower in price, worst case a 6700xt
Probably the 2080
A 4090 equivalent but with 32GB VRAM.
He said compete, not blow the frick out of the water 4 times over
Parents will not buy a console costing a shitload of money
What is the 1650 Super 4GB equal to?
in terms of raster performance it's juuuuuust faster than the 1060 6GB, so about as good as the Xbox One X
the low VRAM fricks it, though
RTX 4090
I just got a RX 6750 XT. should be better than a piss5 and at least on par with a piss6 but that's ridiculous there's no way the piss5 is being retired yet it just released wtf sony you idiot homosexual motherfrickers god damn.
It's not getting retired yet, but it's reaching the middle of its lifecycle.
New PlayStations come out every 6 or 7 years.
people are saying that the 5 will be the last playstation tho and everything after will be built into every tv
Half a life-span away from being replaced and it still has no games.
this shocks me. if you look at the exclusive PS5 games list, its been 11 games for 3 years. the entire consoles life, its had 11, and never a single game more
Probably a 1080 ti
4090 is the closest, but I think we have to wait till next gen
What makes you think that Sony will make such a huge leap from PS5 to PS6, when the PS5 can't even do 4k?
He doesn't think, he's disabled
A PS5 is comparable to a 3060 ti, moron. Why you think they will cheap out on the ps6?
>2070
ftfy
Are u moronic or just fricking stupid
It's a snoy. He's both (and poor).
>A PS5 is comparable to a 3060 ti, moron.
Not even close. At BEST it's comparable to a 2070.
8K GAMING
Realistically a 3070ti/3080
>PS3 ~ 7800 GTX(high-end card released a year before the console)
>PS4 ~ HD 7850(mid-range card released a year before the console)
>PS5 ~ RX 5700 XT(mid-range card released a year before the console)
>The PS6 will come out in 2026 or 2027, and the RTX 50 series has been delayed to 2025
Therefore, the PS6 will be equivalent to the 5070, which will likely be as powerful as the 4080
there won't be one cause there's unfixable issues on PC that will always be bottlenecking the performance
Transistors aren't getting smaller anymore. I guarantee it won't beat a 4090.
>transistors
You called?
Obsessed.
frick off moron amd produce all the console apus because that are pajeet cheap and nvida are morons
Might be about a 3070.
>Which GPU do you think is(or will be) the first one to compete with a PS6?
A 2070 is better than a PS5, so I'm gonna go ahead and assume that any of the 30 and 40 series cards are already better than whatever the PS6 will be. Sony and MS aren't as bad as Nintendo, but their consoles are still outdated horseshit on the day of release too.
rtx3080
The ps5 is pretty much exactly 4 times stronger than a ps4. Just take a 2070 super and times it by 4 and you've got a ps6.
>Just take a 2070 super and times it by 4 and you've got a ps6.
according to techpowerup that means even a 4090 wouldn't be enough