>Dark Souls 1
Amazingly crafted atmospheric grim world that boasts superbly crafted level design. There has never been a game truer to an adventure than Dark Souls 1 >Dark Souls 2
Nails the atmosphere, quite experimental. >Dark Souls 3
Perfected melee combat and has the best bosses in a video game to date, the DLCs are a must.
1 then 3. no need to play 2 at all, especially if its not the scholar edition
Frick off, 2 is great. The original is also better than SOTFS. It's the best Dark Souls in general.
The first one
3, 2, 1 so you progressively play better games
Wouldn't that be 2,3,1 then?
Though I doubt anyone would continue with the series after starting with 2
2 is better than 3
The first one moron
demon's souls
>duhhhhh do i play part 3 first?
All are shit and not worth playing but you should play 2 and shitpost about it to make slopsoyFtMware gays Seath
throw them all in the trash and play Bloodborne.
that stuttery 30 fps piece of shit isnt good
Works on my machine.
no it doesnt lol
>saving webms of games you don't like
yikes
This is day 1 code. It's still not perfect but it's a lot better than this now.
That's the only one I've beaten because the others are all generic looking as frick.
>Dark Souls 1
Amazingly crafted atmospheric grim world that boasts superbly crafted level design. There has never been a game truer to an adventure than Dark Souls 1
>Dark Souls 2
Nails the atmosphere, quite experimental.
>Dark Souls 3
Perfected melee combat and has the best bosses in a video game to date, the DLCs are a must.
I bet you had fun playing those games lol. fricking autists man
You seem upset, homosexual.
>the best bosses in a video game to date
>big knight with a flaming sword x20
Weak b8 + filtered
Elden Ring
don't play soulsslop
>no christmas fortune
1 or demon's first
>D,1,2
Dungeon RPGs
>3
Action game
Armored Core (psx)
first play 1 then play 2 and get immersed in the pvp and enjoy it and then throw 3 in the trash
WHY IS THE FIRST ONE A DIFFERENT SHADE OF BLUE
CAN YOU EMULATE BLOODBORNE YET
1 then 2 then 3