I don't know wtf is causing this psyop, but good few years ago fallout 3 never held a candle to New Vegas in terms of general enjoyment and content.
I've played both, and while 3 does has its moments, it's a terrible and empty RPG game, and considering that both games are filled to the brim with bugs. New Vegas manages to triumph over 3 in ways far superior than whatever any nostalgia gay tries to justify with the same copypasta wojak edit.
dunno i played f3 and loved it. then tried fnv and alt-f4 2 hours in.
Then whats the point in playing a survival rpg if you're just going to quit not even a 1/3 in?
Best thing about Vegas is its far less linear storytelling and playstyle unlike 3.
linear game =/= bad.
i'll take a very well done linear game over non-linear any day.
Its not even a good linear game. Its characters and story is just so fricking flat like a roadkilled pidgeon.
The only real and meaningful reason to progress is just gameplay and to conclude whatever pitiful "ending" that you'd want to see pay off in the most gay way possible.
Its all so tiresome...
did you play 3 or NV first?
Vegas first but I got 3 halfway through Vegas back on console.
>played NV first
ok so basically you've just invalidated your opinion.
>it's a terrible and empty RPG game
Just like New Vegas. End of thread.
t. is world of warcraft blob irl
Me.
FO3 lets you do whatever the frick you want the moment you're out of the tutorial.
Vegas hard-rails you into following a particular route for the first half of the game.
This automatically makes FO3 better.
Brah, you've not played New Vegas because if you did, you know straight away that you don't have to do that big fricking loop from Goodsprings to Nipton and Novac ect.
Fallout 3 doesn't transition story points very well at all.
I remember my first game where I ran from Megaton, all along the river on the way to Rivet City.
When I arrived some characters who I never knew or met spoke to me as if I had already helped them out before.
Little did I know that they are related to that scripted scene at GNR, and it just simply doesn't have that openess that I constantly keep hearing about Fallout 3
>FO3 lets you do whatever you want!
>all the things you can do fricking suck
Wow what a hot opinion
Fair, I think the Strip and Freeside are cooler than FO3's city areas though
I play TTW and can switch between the wastelands at will. I don't buy into this consoletard bullshit. That's for plebs and nintentroons.
Me
Exploring a ruined city is significantly more interesting than a fricking desert
EVERYONE
They don't, NV fans are just autistic nerds (also why so many are trannies) that take the bait every time. For guys that like to jerk each other off over your understanding of a game's nuanced politics you really are stupid.
I would agree with you in the case that the same people who obsess over the minute details of factions are the same people who play hoi 4 for thousands of hours.