why can't millennials and zoomers handle anything below 60 fps?

why can't millennials and zoomers handle anything below 60 fps? they literally puke,shit and piss themselves playing 30 fps games lol weakest generations of gamers i swear

CRIME Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The game is less responsive. One of the big reasons CoD was so polular is that it ran at a higher FPs than games like Halo and Gears. Mimor visual differences aside, It FELT better to play.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Halo was 60fps.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Halo was 60fps.
        Every Halo game on the OG Xbox and Xbox 360 was 30fps.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >millennials and zoomers
    Games use to be 60 FPS more often than not in PS2 days. It's the PS3/360 gen and especially PS4/Xbone that shat everything up. You Black personfricking moron.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      i can't think of a single relevant PS2 game that ran at 60 fps. gamecube and xbox games but not ps2. ps2 games always ran like ass.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >30 fps
    The problem is that sometimes games are even below that.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >30 fps
    >60 fps
    >2024
    Poorgays are hilarious
    I bet you still play at 1080p too

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      i play at 720p because 1080p and 4k are too sharp. 720p feels more vintage

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >left soul
    >right souless

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >30fps

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >60fps

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    A consistent 1080p and 60 FPS is literally the minimum, especially as hardware has advanced. The Switch is a potato.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      disagree

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I forgot to specify these days. Many old games (such as OOT) are still fun today.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me true minimum is 4k 72fps and what I'll ideally settle for is 6k 90fps
    Needs a 4090 but sometimes it's achievable

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >30fps

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >60fps

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      GOD THOSE BACKGROUNDS MAKE ME CUM

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's some next level pralax in the background

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's just sunken cost morons trying to justify all the money they wasted on a computer to play the same games as everyone else can on a $500 machine

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >He thinks that playing games at a consistent 1080p and 60 FPS in 2024 is an ambitious expectation

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The only way 30fps is tolerable is if it's absolutely consistent, fluctuating that low is terrible.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only way 30fps is tolerable is if it's absolutely consistent
      And if you're using a controller. With a mouse its unplayable.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm fine with playing King's Field 3 at 15 FPS but if a studio is too incompetent to make a game run on my 3080 at 60 FPS in the modern era, they're fricking morons.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >3080

      My condolences.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    40-50 fps gang rise UP!

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its only pc losers that care about fps. But they need something to justify spending thousands to play video games

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      See:

      >He thinks that playing games at a consistent 1080p and 60 FPS in 2024 is an ambitious expectation

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i used to think that 60fps was enough but realistically you should have at least a 144hz monitor and run the game at 160+ fps to minimize frametime inconsistencies through meshing
    at that point you have wrung out 90% of the possibly gains in responsiveness and visual smoothness. going to 240hz is largely pointless unless you are one of the top 2 or 3 cs pros in the world. people frequently fail to identify the 240hz monitor when used side by side with a 144hz one, but they basically always can identify the 144hz monitor beside the 60hz one

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    CRT 60fps was 120fps on a modern TV

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Millenials grew up on the ps1/n64, which ran at an amazing 20fps.

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    NES and SNES games are 60 fps rofl

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    it isn't about what we "grew up with". yes I played OOT in sub-60 fps. but if I emulated OOT today I absolutely would install patches to increase the FPS because having smoother motion, less graphical jitter when I move the camera, and more responsive controls is always better. it never makes a game worse.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    oleds

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *