why can't millennials and zoomers handle anything below 60 fps? they literally puke,shit and piss themselves playing 30 fps games lol weakest generations of gamers i swear
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
The game is less responsive. One of the big reasons CoD was so polular is that it ran at a higher FPs than games like Halo and Gears. Mimor visual differences aside, It FELT better to play.
Halo was 60fps.
>Halo was 60fps.
Every Halo game on the OG Xbox and Xbox 360 was 30fps.
>millennials and zoomers
Games use to be 60 FPS more often than not in PS2 days. It's the PS3/360 gen and especially PS4/Xbone that shat everything up. You Black personfricking moron.
i can't think of a single relevant PS2 game that ran at 60 fps. gamecube and xbox games but not ps2. ps2 games always ran like ass.
>30 fps
The problem is that sometimes games are even below that.
>30 fps
>60 fps
>2024
Poorgays are hilarious
I bet you still play at 1080p too
i play at 720p because 1080p and 4k are too sharp. 720p feels more vintage
>left soul
>right souless
>30fps
>60fps
A consistent 1080p and 60 FPS is literally the minimum, especially as hardware has advanced. The Switch is a potato.
disagree
I forgot to specify these days. Many old games (such as OOT) are still fun today.
For me true minimum is 4k 72fps and what I'll ideally settle for is 6k 90fps
Needs a 4090 but sometimes it's achievable
>30fps
>60fps
GOD THOSE BACKGROUNDS MAKE ME CUM
That's some next level pralax in the background
It's just sunken cost morons trying to justify all the money they wasted on a computer to play the same games as everyone else can on a $500 machine
>He thinks that playing games at a consistent 1080p and 60 FPS in 2024 is an ambitious expectation
The only way 30fps is tolerable is if it's absolutely consistent, fluctuating that low is terrible.
The only way 30fps is tolerable is if it's absolutely consistent
And if you're using a controller. With a mouse its unplayable.
I'm fine with playing King's Field 3 at 15 FPS but if a studio is too incompetent to make a game run on my 3080 at 60 FPS in the modern era, they're fricking morons.
>3080
My condolences.
40-50 fps gang rise UP!
Its only pc losers that care about fps. But they need something to justify spending thousands to play video games
See:
i used to think that 60fps was enough but realistically you should have at least a 144hz monitor and run the game at 160+ fps to minimize frametime inconsistencies through meshing
at that point you have wrung out 90% of the possibly gains in responsiveness and visual smoothness. going to 240hz is largely pointless unless you are one of the top 2 or 3 cs pros in the world. people frequently fail to identify the 240hz monitor when used side by side with a 144hz one, but they basically always can identify the 144hz monitor beside the 60hz one
CRT 60fps was 120fps on a modern TV
Millenials grew up on the ps1/n64, which ran at an amazing 20fps.
NES and SNES games are 60 fps rofl
it isn't about what we "grew up with". yes I played OOT in sub-60 fps. but if I emulated OOT today I absolutely would install patches to increase the FPS because having smoother motion, less graphical jitter when I move the camera, and more responsive controls is always better. it never makes a game worse.
oleds