Why did the Game Awards pretend this never existed?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why did the Game Awards pretend this never existed?
Why did the Game Awards pretend this never existed?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
What would it even be nominated for?
Not op but started playing a couple days ago and the world design looked nice, mostly just the castle.
Is there an award for that?
castle alone was GOAT. fricking shame the quality drops hard when you leave the castle grounds
You will never be a real woman
ost, action adventure and arguably rpg considering what passes as an rpg these days, honestly at anything that spiderman 2 got nominated it's just better
They need to get rid of the “best content creator” award and add “best atmosphere” and “best combat”
>“best atmosphere” and “best combat”
Congratulations, you just solved why modern AAA gaming is soulless shit. No one cares about atmosphere or gameplay.
I'll say, vanilla combat was good but with the mouse gestures mod the combat was so fricking fun.
I haven't played the game but this you just told me made me want to finally install it and play
sounds fun as frick
Most stunning and brave characters
game adaptation
everything
even those who played it don't remember it existed
because everyone forgot about it?
It's still near the top of Amazon's best sellers lists and PS/Xbox most played lists.
It made over a billion dollars, multitude times more than most games shown yesterday.
no amount of profit can make mediocrity memorable, let corpos worry about that
>profit comes straight from consumers
>no amount of profit can make mediocrity memorable
uh, yes it can. It got ignored because of the trannies seetheing and malding. Let's be honest.
Frick off troon
then how come there's a thread being posted about it right now?
I liked the game, it was fun.
Literally the only people that even remember this game are trannies seething about it. Everybody else moved on already
What's wrong with moving on after you play and finish a game you liked?
Even bald gays couldn't surpass its concurrent player score.
It didn't exist.
I SWITCHED TIMELINES AGAIN?!
Look up their "jury" and you'll understand
Couldn't get it to load.
Its because troonys hate the game and Jeff got pressured into making sure it got ZERO recognition
>dude is working on the nomination list
>”hey guys, what about that harry potter game?”
>*gets jumped by a pack of rabid troons from across the office and gangbanged while HR stands up and claps*
Yeah, I could see why everyone kept quiet.
Because it isn't special in anything beyond the internet shitposting it stirred, and there is no prize for that. What else does it have? Gameplay? If it at least did what Bully could do a decade earlier and implement classes maybe it could be worth talking about, but as it stands it's your standard Ubisoft collectathon, nothing more. The music is good, but again, not special. The plot is dull and the world isn't even interesting- it's the same fricking thing as the books even though it happened 200 years earlier. They didn't even bother changing anything. What could you even award it for?
>BAWWW ITS NOT MUH JAPANESE INCEL DATING SIMULATOR
kys
homosexual if you make a game about one of the most iconic schools of magic in literature maybe you should have it BE a school of magic and TEACH YOU MAGIC
>BE a school of magic and TEACH YOU MAGIC
??
It literally does?
> Because it isn't special in anything
That could be said about literally all games at the awards
Trans Chads WON!
Spiderman, Starfield and Hogwarts Legacy.
What do these games have in common?
They’re all video games.
You know exactly why.
J.K Rowling probably
Why do you ask moronic questions op? You know why it didn't get any mentions. Its because the games media is full of the woke moron type people.
Its my 2nd favourite game this year. I found the combat fun. It was like Batman Arkham but wizard.
We know why, but does it really matter? The game made a shitton of money and game awards are just politics, like any other awards show.
Besides as much as I liked the game it's hard to see it deserving a win in any category.
It didn't deserve any awards and this is coming from someone that bought and put tons of hours in the game. It's extremely shallow and a poor RPG. Take away the Harry Potter skin and you're left with a mediocre ubisoft tier game.
It’s not an RPG though, it’s action adventure like Soulsborne and Zelda.
Yeah, and it's being sold as an RPG. They're calling it an RPG in the marketing.
>mediocre ubisoft tier game
those tend(ed) to win most awards in the past
So trannies wouldn’t shit their diapers and protest the awards. We all know the truth.
AND THE GAME AWARD FOR PISSING OFF MEN THAT DRESS LIKE WOMEN GOES TO: HOGWARTS LEGACY. THE TRUE GAME OF THE YEAR
Because it's a shitty mid game and the only reason it got talked about 2 weeks after release is because chuds co-opted it for their autistic troony wars
Is it shitty or is it mid? YWNBAW btw.
It has 13k people playing on Steam right now. Can't fit into the top 100 most played. Why should it win?
>Single player game with no DLC has 13k concurrent players 10 months after release
That's really good.
That's less than Fallout 4.
Fallout 4 is a bethesda game, a huge franchise, and bethesda game playercount gets boosted by mods.
I forgot that Harry Potter was such a niche franchise.
Don't be an idiot. My point is comparing a huge franchise singleplayer game with no DLC and limited modding with a huge franchise singleplayer game WITH DLC AND EXTENSIVE MODDING is stupid.
it's one of the most boring and generic AAA games of the year with so many useless collection things.
Only things worth a damn are:
Ancient Magic Trails - increase Ancient Magic Meter
Merlin Trials - give you more gear inventory so you can sell more of the shit you find
with what you said it would still beat all the slop they nominated (but BG3 would still win)
i have not played this yet, how is the exploration in this game? i hear different stories. some say it's good others say there are a lot of repetitive locations.
>i have not played this yet, how is the exploration in this game?
you have a giant open world and you can wander around Hogwarts.
There is fast travel, once you find the markers
Eventually you get a broom and there is a questline to make the brooms faster/better
I don't think "just exploring" is worth it a lot of the time, especially outside the castle, but there's a ton of cool locations you'll end up going through, it's a well crafted world.
Just don't go bothering completing every collection or anything cause that's just a mindless chore.
>but there's a ton of cool locations you'll end up going through
ok i was hoping for this the most.
I am an anti-semite who refuses to call trannies their preferred pronouns and Nogwarts Lagacy is a 6.5/10 on a good day when your machine is actually running it well. 4090s and top of the line CPUs cant run this lame shit well. The devs made Walmart shovelware before this and it fricking shows. I spent like 10 of my 90 hours of playtime trouble shooting this dogshit. It's STILL broken. Just go to the steam forums if you think I'm some lying troon. People give this shit a pass because of the culture war and I fricking hate you Black folk. Half of the people shilling it are probably cuckservatives who root for Israel.
ESG Score wasn't high enough. Devs were going off old charts.
>why did everyone forget that uninspired AAA open world lootslop #64521 existed after it came out
Who knows
because it's shitty ubisoft-tier game
Geoff could’ve done the funniest thing ever, but he got scared.
It wasn’t actually any good. Sorry OP.
Because like half of Game Awards hosts are trannies
looks shoped
>write a series about magic that allow people to transform into other people and even animals
>"a man cant become a woman tho"
Because HP was a shit franchise even before the stupid fricking drama.
their publisher don’t pay money to market this game for gamers because they know their fans are movie fans not gamers.