Why did Todd do it
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Why did Todd do it
Why did Todd do it
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
They were working alongside Xbox to bring stuff to the new marketplace that had been created for the sake of selling xbox live points.
I have no problem with Horse Armor.
It was cheap (like $2.00, I think), entirely optional, and could aid in immersion, I can't recall if it actually functioned like armor, bonus if so.
There are much worse modern day downloadable offerings and predatory behavior.
>I have no problem with Horse Armor
You're the reason gaming is ruined. This type of thing used to be found in the game by actually playing, not just swiping daddy's credit card
I use my own money and always have.
It's a simple cosmetic.
Cry more, and have a nice day.
scab
It raised their health. Not that it mattered. Oblivion is so broken and shit anyway that scaling wouldn't have noticed the difference.
Doing the DB questline gave you an immortal horse anyway, I think it was the fastest one in the game too
Yeah and because morons like you had no problem with horse armor they kept escalating and escalating until we got to where we are today. You're to blame for this.
No, I'm not.
Cosmetics aren't the problem. If you want to buy a different look for a buck or two, sure.
If you're spending $10 or more, that's a separate problem, if you're buying random loot crates, that's a problem, if you're paying to win, that's a problem.
have a nice day.
If you seriously can't see how the normalization of microtransactions was the problem then you're a sub 70 iq ape
Spent $2 on a skin, cry more.
have a nice day.
It's a slippery slope you homosexual. Horse armor seems almost benign today, because you've let the predatory practises get worse and worse.
Explain what's acceptable DLC and price what justifies it and how
What if somebody disagrees with your judgment?
Spending around a dollar for a skin seems fair both back then and today.
No it fricking doesn't, you're seriously going to claim that one skin takes as much effort to make as 1/60th of a full game? Why the frick would the company put their efforts towards making games and big expansions when they can shit out skins for 100x the profit margins?
I'm saying if the price is so cheap, the frick does it matter?
There is a difference between an individual being willing to throw a dollar in exchange for a new design, and spending 5 dollars on a randomized loot crate.
If you can't see the difference between the two then you're being intentionally obtuse.
Hell, there were people who thought expansion packs should be free ever since they first ever came out.
Value is viewed in different ways, I personally think cosmetics should be added free, some developers do that, some don't, but if you find a design intriguing enough to you to spend a dollar on it and getting what was advertised?m, what's the harm? It's your money and entirely optional cosmetic.
To be so irrationally angry about it weakens the impact when people call out loot boxes and pay to win purchases
It matters because it incentivizes companies to focus their games around microtransactions instead of making proper games with big expansions. Why the frick would they focus their efforts on making big games when they can sell you skins for massively better profit margins?
You're talking about games like Fortnite. A separate issue, which again, I've called out.
If you think Horse Armor = Fortnite, then all the power to you, but I see a massive difference.
Gotta have something to shill on your newly minted shilling platform.
He's known for almost 20 years now that bethesdrones will enthusiastically pay cold hard cash for literally any turd he pinches off no matter how big or stinky, and they still regularly fall for it to this day as evidenced by the artificial cope-hype around Tardfield
the horse armor that ruined vidya forever
We should have pushed him back in.
What is happening to the horse eye?
You laughed at him for being in the chess club, and he made you buy useless DLC. Who's laughing now?
Why is it wrong for a horse to be protected?
>make game with good art style
>introduce cash shop
>i-i-it's just cosmetics!
>5 years pass
>art style is now utter clown world
many such cases
He just wanted your horse to be well protected. Is that bad?
People cry about this then go farm hats and crates in valve games.