Why do games keep having these as weapons when they're next to useless as a weapon in real life?

Why do games keep having these as weapons when they're next to useless as a weapon in real life?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because they're cool.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nearly useless in battle, but "nearly useless" trumps "empty-handed.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why was this shit even invented when a regular staff/stick is ten times more effective and much easier to make from the same material?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        You can't conceal a staff

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not a weapon, it's a training tool to improve body coordination.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          It was originally a tool for threshing rice.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's concealable and it hits much harder

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      While you're busy doing stupid ass tricks with your useless sticks you already got punched in the face several times, most by them alone.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are such a larper. Simply unchaining the nunchuks and grasping one handle and punching with that hand is more deadly than bare hands.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          or just holding them doubled up. It's pretty hard to find a hard object that wouldn't be advantageous in a fight, with the caveat that fighting bare handed allows you to grapple.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        What if they were gopher chucks?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      you can literally very easily die if you get hit by one of these things, how the frick does that make them useless, exactly?

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Name six games with nun-chucks, without Googling it.
    I genuinely can't think of any except TNMT games.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      yakuza 0
      yakuza 1
      yakuza 2
      yakuza 3
      yakuza 4
      yakuza 5

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      road rash
      road rash -sega saturn
      road rash 2
      road rash 2 - sega saturn

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      ninja gaiden black

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      dead cells? now im not sure.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      all ive got is ninja gaiden and the elvis impersonator in soul calibur

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      the american moron in HM2 use nun-chucks

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      One of the mortal kombats had Liu Kang use them

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      DMC3
      Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2
      Bayonetta
      Soul Calibur
      Yakuza
      Jackie Chan

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nethack I think
        shit that's the only one I can think of and i'm not even confident in it

        shit how did I forget bayonetta

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nethack I think
      shit that's the only one I can think of and i'm not even confident in it

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's probably 6 (can't name any myself) but your point stands. It's far from overused

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Soul Calibur 1-6

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Double Dragon
      >Ninja Gaiden
      >Dynasty Warriors(?)
      >Nintendo Wii
      That's all I can think of

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think Warzone added them sometime ago

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Slay the Spire

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Any yakuza
      The first bayo
      Dmc3 and dmc5
      NGB and NG2

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking reality gays so much.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    because scythes are cool

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They look cool when you're swinging them at nobody. That works well in movies where nobody is actually getting hit, and in video games where there's no impact and weapons follow through an enemy's body.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rule of cool

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They're not useless. They're a baton tied to another baton, and easy to conceal.
    The flippy shit people do with them is useless, you'd be using them more like a club with extended range, or like a whip.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The flippy shit people do with them is useless, you'd be using them more like a club with extended range, or like a whip.
      A stick picked up off the ground would make a better club than moronchucks

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Would you rather look for a stick on a ground or have sticks in your coat pocket?
        Buy a gun though

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I would remove the moron chain and have 2 sticks

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It wouldn't though. A stick off the ground is much more likely to be made of weaker wood.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's not a fair comparison, stick on the ground is unbeatable

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          You could easily take out several of 1000 marines with the stick
          >leave stick on ground
          >marines find stick on ground
          >marines proceed to do moronic shit with the stick that results in several casualties (most likely using it to try to hit grenades like baseballs resulting in several fatalities or planting it in the ground to see who can jump over it in full combat gear resulting in several dozen punctured testicles and rectums)

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        moron who doesn't understand basic physics
        Kill thyself

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >moron thinks hitting something with something on a chain hits harder than something not on a chain
          Stay in school and stop getting your information from Hollywood

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        the stick wouldnt have as much momentum when swung, and the wood wood be less dense. doubly so you use metal ones

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          No? If you swung with a club you have the full arc of your swing, the club attached to the one you are holding only gains inertia after that, only using the length of the cord. There's a reason why carpenters don't put the heads of hammers on a chain. The only benefit you would get is if you were clearing out weeds and didn't have access to a blade.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >There's a reason why carpenters don't put the heads of hammers on a chain.
            Uhh yeah, but I don't think it's the reasoning you're thinking of.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            hammers require
            precision that's lost when you add a chain

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              A sledgehammer then specifically, let's say I didn't need to be precise I just needed as much force as possible to break up dry wall or concrete. Why not stick the head to a chain if it gets more force?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                For safety, anon.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                So essentially in a controlled environment having a chain-based tool is too dangerous to the user, but in a fight is worth it. Unironcally that makes a case for using your fists instead.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                sledgehammers aren't a tool that should require specialized training beyond the obligatory safety stuff
                nunchucks are a weapon, you're expected to have training for using it

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                sledgehammers have high inertia making them slow but good for driving through solid, thick materials
                nunchucks are really fricking fast because of levers so they have lower inertia but still a good amount of momentum (and energy) behind them so they're really good for beating the absolute shit out of someone who's not wearing armor

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            But why do birds suddenly appear, every time The Carpenters are near?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >easy to conceal
      So is a decent knife and that does more damage and takes up less space and is widely available

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Peasants werent allowed to have knives.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'd prefer a blunt object to a blade since my objective is to end the fight not do more damage. If the situation has already escalated to attempted murder there isn't a better solution than a gun, so knives are a bad middle ground.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >useless as a weapon in real life?
    so like most of the video game weapons?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, man. You could totally use a greatsword or a short sword with an overly spikey handle.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason why swords are in games despite being a personal defense weapon that you pull out when shit is hitting the fan instead of polearms

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong analogy.
      Proper analogy: swords is 100 rds magazine pistol, lance is 1 round rifle. Why do people carry pistols to supplement 1 rd rifle again?

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sure let me hit you with one to show you useless it is

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are daggers?

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    because you're a braindead sack of stupid Black person shit that doesn't know what proper nunchaku look like or how they're used

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI shlurping Australian mormon moron made other morons online think that Nunchucks are suddenly stupid
    It's a concealed weapon from a place and time when literally anyone walking down the street could be a fricking samurai wanting to see how much someone bleeds when they get cut in half.
    You hid them in the sleeve of your robe or coat.

    >Durr I would just use a stick without the chain durr

    Ok moron, effectively hide a weapon the length of a fully extended nunchuck in your fricking shirt sleeve.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Arguably flail on the stick or just stickless flail is better.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Stickless flail
        This was also a concealed weapon that was used.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah it's perfect muggers weapon. You can hide chain tied inside sleeve, and ball in closed palm and aproach victim ready to swing. And it crushes skull like a pumpkin and victim goes down without sound.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's also extremely easy to make for your average peasant.
            You can make this out of scrap metal from your smithy.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Russian language has old idiom
              >make wooshing sounds with flail on the road
              Meaning to become bandit.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      moron-tier post

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They're a perfectly fine weapon

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they were ineffective weapons they wouldn't have seen use, like the flail.

    The flail shows up in historical texts, and was technically real, but it didn't actually see use as far as anyone can tell. Fencing manuals refer to how to use the flail, but as far as actual battles go, people seemed to leave it at home in favor of weapons that didn't suck.

    The nunchucks actually saw use.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >but it didn't actually see use as far as anyone can tell.
      You just don't know. Max conceliable variant (no stick) was staple weapon of the slav bandits, there are bazillions archeology finds.
      Flail made form the whip (lead bullet tied to the tip) was staple weapon of the Eurasian nomads, again bazillion archeology finds.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I guess when I say flail I mean specifically this fricking thing.
        But yeah many cultures had "thing to hit with on the end of a rope or chain" weapons.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Supposedly no one ever used the flail in real combat we barely even have any genuine specimens.
          The one you posted is just a concept.
          Pick related is the closest thing to an actual flail but its just a peasant weapon.
          Only good at being unpredictable and harder to guard against but not lethal enough vs armored targets and often not even vs unarmored ones.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          a lot of people (peasants) literally went to war with farming tools, back in the day. if you think everyone was some super decked-out chad with leet weapons, you're totally wrong. imagine being some 15 year old c**t and you were in the middle of a live battlefield and all they felt like giving you, was an old, dirty, rusted, knife? that was the reality for a lot of medieval gays back then.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not a historian or anything but if you're young, have a shit weapon, and are on a battlefield, surviving, you don't stick with your shitty knife or dagger. You grab a dead dudes sword, spear, shield, anything else. I'd argue most weapons aren't even with their original owner.

            All I'm saying is, if I was a peasant conscript and made it out alive, you know fo sho I'm stealing some good boots, armor, weapons, etc.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >All I'm saying is, if I was a peasant conscript and made it out alive, you know fo sho I'm stealing some good boots, armor, weapons, etc.
              this obviously happened all the time, as well. no one is just going to let good armor and swords rust in the field.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Exactly, which is why flails and the like were probably used more than people think. Your only weapon is a piece of shit knife? A broken spear haft? Or a dented sword or some other shit? You see a dude die with his flail, you're picking that shit up. Hard wood handle with good (at the time) metal chains and the spiked ball? You'd probably get giddy just at the thought of smashing some other peasants brains in with that shit, even if you weren't trained at all

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Can't believe war is P2W.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      flails (the farming tool) were widely used both for self-defebse and in battle during peasant rebellions.
      Of course, it only has limited use when you are swinging a stick at a guy wearing plate.

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I NEED GOPHER-CHUK'S

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    As murican police. They use nunchucks.

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    blame bruce lee

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    because repurposed farming equipment is cool

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bruce Lee

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The frick. Incredibly hard to use properly and be skilled with is not "useless".

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because its cool and video games dont need to be historically accurate to be fun.

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because they're cool and most people aren't joyless c**ts like you

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You've never read Sun Tzu's Art of War?

    >Inb4 Machiavelli's Art of War is better and superior in the long run

  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do threads have to start with bait? And, worse, moronic bait that is offensively insulting to anyone with even half a brain?
    OP could have started the thread with: "What do you all think of nunchucks in videogames?"
    Instead, OP used a braindead appeal to realism to argue that nunchucks have no place in videogames, which way more often than not are set in fantasy environments with magic, the supernatural and all that where realism gets thrown out the door.
    OP probably knows this is bait and chose to start with it. Why?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >OP could have started the thread with: "What do you all think of nunchucks in videogames?"
      And then most people wouldn't have cared and the thread would die for the handful of people that would have just discussed it.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because it got you to reply, moron

  27. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    As far as handheld melee weapons go that you can easily conseal, nunchucks are fantastic if you know how to use them.

  28. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't hate just because you don't know how to use them.

  29. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people call nunchaku "useless"? Imagine even a regular ass dude, no training at all, spinning that shit and wiping it at your head, you're probably break your nose, eye socket, jaw, or something else, maybe even a combo of them all.

    homies says they aren't scared of a nunchuck hitting them, you have no fricking idea bro

  30. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's a super hard stick you can swing at someone's face super fast. i'm pretty sure getting hit with one of these will hurt like all fricking hell and will instantly incapacitate literally anyone who gets bonked over the head by one of these little bad boys.

  31. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nunchucks are kino im really tempted to buy one just like my uncle did

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *