>Metroid Prime is not one of those remakes. >the beam lighting doesn't matter >it's fine that it's missing, but missing doesn't mean it's objectively worse
it does >reflection effect missing
it does >visor fricked,that doesn't mean it...
it does
just some muh HD assets does not make this objectively better, when GAMEPLAY RELEVANT GRAPHICS ARE FRICKING MISSING, BECAUSE HACKS DID THESE PORTS
Left is original.
>transparency doesn't properly work
objectively worse
Andof course worse yet you can't switch to OG graphics, because dumb fricksdidthe port
Also Varia Suit missing too
Lighting and particle effects is where the remaster falls short, but models and textures are all very good and larelgely respectful to the original even if there's differences. I think it's a testament to how damn impressive the original is after all these years. I appreciate that the remaster exists though. There have been remakes of games I really think would have been better off never having been made but Prime remaster is not one of them.
wow that's fricking terrible
how do you make something this simplistic look worse? do they not have eyes or are they just incapable of understanding artistic aesthetic
It's because the remaster is based off the PC version running in Software mode, which lacks the lighting/weather effects present in the PS1 and PC (Hardware) versions. That WebM is made from two different games; the comparison would be more reasonable if it were recorded using the TR remaster's graphics toggle button. Not to say that it's not moronic that they used the Software Mode PC version as a base, mind, but that's how 99% of PC players experienced those games.
>That WebM is made from two different games; the comparison would be more reasonable if it were recorded using the TR remaster's graphics toggle button.
that's literally what I did in this webm you dishonest shill, TLA isn't even on PS1
because so called "modern" hardware is shit re: lighting >it's too power consume
so you designed SHIT hardware >nooooo, it's modern hardware how dare youuuu
the remaster seems to have some kind of shitty depth of field post process shit going on, everything in the background looks mushed. The original has no such nonsense, so the background of the environments look sharper overall instead of being a blurred mess.
Same issue that all remakes of games noteworthy for their great art have: the actual visuals of the original itself are what people are emotionally attached to, not the content.
The part that gets painted over contained all the bits people liked, the new painting is just a painting of painting you like, regardless of how good or faithful it is.
Yes. That's why it is important to create an impression of the forest with visual clarity and designed color composition instead of mindlessly copying "real life" random examples.
Le old le good
Le new le bad
Yes. Majority of new attempts are made by talentless hacks, who would be working at fast food at earlier days. Now they have an access to instruments, that allow them to create games, but does not allow them to have talent or experience out if nowhere, not to mention automatisation, that allows them to do "yeah, it's more or less ok, don't want to spend more time on it" attitude instead of attention to everything.
More than that, half of all attempts are "let's try to outdo professionals, but not work as hard as them nor understand, what we are competing against", which leads to imminent failures. New bad because majority of new developers suck dicks instead of thinking of new things, applying efforts to make them really good or at least making proper research of what was done in the past, how and why. Lazy homosexuals can't create or recreate anything good.
Bottom looks 100% better.
AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH
Yes but no but yes but no
>glowing blue paint over the door
Real subtle
Top ship is more aesthetically pleasing. I don't like the terrain in either
bottom is too damn shimmery
unironically bottom looks sorta like WCIII remaster
It doesn't.
There are a lot of games where the remake objectively looks worse. Metroid Prime is not one of those remakes.
/fricking thread
>Metroid Prime is not one of those remakes.
>the beam lighting doesn't matter
>it's fine that it's missing, but missing doesn't mean it's objectively worse
it does
>reflection effect missing
it does
>visor fricked,that doesn't mean it...
it does
just some muh HD assets does not make this objectively better, when GAMEPLAY RELEVANT GRAPHICS ARE FRICKING MISSING, BECAUSE HACKS DID THESE PORTS
>transparency doesn't properly work
objectively worse
Andof course worse yet you can't switch to OG graphics, because dumb fricksdidthe port
Also Varia Suit missing too
Made by white people.
top obviously looks 10000x better
bottom is full of post processing effects to impress the newer generation of gamers
The lighting. The lighting is better in the original. But that's about it, other than that, everything about the OG looks worse.
Except the rain is also better in OG, as well as the perspective.
Wait, they actually updated models and such for the remaster? How do Primegays as a whole feel about all this?
Lighting and particle effects is where the remaster falls short, but models and textures are all very good and larelgely respectful to the original even if there's differences. I think it's a testament to how damn impressive the original is after all these years. I appreciate that the remaster exists though. There have been remakes of games I really think would have been better off never having been made but Prime remaster is not one of them.
wow that's fricking terrible
how do you make something this simplistic look worse? do they not have eyes or are they just incapable of understanding artistic aesthetic
It's because the remaster is based off the PC version running in Software mode, which lacks the lighting/weather effects present in the PS1 and PC (Hardware) versions. That WebM is made from two different games; the comparison would be more reasonable if it were recorded using the TR remaster's graphics toggle button.
Not to say that it's not moronic that they used the Software Mode PC version as a base, mind, but that's how 99% of PC players experienced those games.
Why even provide that as a option? and even if you did change it back they censored it
>That WebM is made from two different games; the comparison would be more reasonable if it were recorded using the TR remaster's graphics toggle button.
that's literally what I did in this webm you dishonest shill, TLA isn't even on PS1
the remake tries to look clean and tidy, and that's plays against it.
This remaster is laughably bad. It's literally like that castlevania meme where they just slap some stock images on there and call it good.
That's just Abyss Odyssey.
>hd remake fricks up the lighting
why does this always happen
>look at all the HD textures we made! no we can't have heavy shadows, you need to see ALL the textures we made!
because so called "modern" hardware is shit re: lighting
>it's too power consume
so you designed SHIT hardware
>nooooo, it's modern hardware how dare youuuu
Nintendo literally had nothing to do with the deaignnof the tegra x1. They just underclocked it and disabled some cpu cores.
>nothing to do
>they just chose shit hardware
lmao
The water in particular looks like the difference between Half-Life 1 and 2.
>ponytail physics still fricked up in the remaster
At least this part is soulful.
bottom is using a lot of stock resources.
Bottom unironically looks better.
same tree.
Left is original.
>anti-soul fog
Every time.
Hot take, they both look good.
Prime remastered has visuals that dunk on most sloppa on much more powerful hardware.
The original has more... depth?
>original looks more pleasing yet more realistic at the same time
huh?
the remaster seems to have some kind of shitty depth of field post process shit going on, everything in the background looks mushed. The original has no such nonsense, so the background of the environments look sharper overall instead of being a blurred mess.
It doesn't
This is one of the rare cases where the new screenshot completely mogs the old.
Yeah the increased polygons really sells it. Looks more realistic by a long shot. OP is a tard
why are you a gay moron
Soul, souless.
>complex gemoetry
>vegetation
>clouds and moonlight
>glare on the engines
>great lighting
It doesn't. The remake looks much better
The original ship looks fricking stupid, shiny as frick and the door is too hard to see.
SOVL
NINTENDO
HIRE
this can be said about practically any and all remakes
Same issue that all remakes of games noteworthy for their great art have: the actual visuals of the original itself are what people are emotionally attached to, not the content.
The part that gets painted over contained all the bits people liked, the new painting is just a painting of painting you like, regardless of how good or faithful it is.
Bottom has too much irrelevant detail-noise and is irritating to the eye.
You have ever been in a wooded area, have you?
Yes. That's why it is important to create an impression of the forest with visual clarity and designed color composition instead of mindlessly copying "real life" random examples.
Yes. Majority of new attempts are made by talentless hacks, who would be working at fast food at earlier days. Now they have an access to instruments, that allow them to create games, but does not allow them to have talent or experience out if nowhere, not to mention automatisation, that allows them to do "yeah, it's more or less ok, don't want to spend more time on it" attitude instead of attention to everything.
More than that, half of all attempts are "let's try to outdo professionals, but not work as hard as them nor understand, what we are competing against", which leads to imminent failures. New bad because majority of new developers suck dicks instead of thinking of new things, applying efforts to make them really good or at least making proper research of what was done in the past, how and why. Lazy homosexuals can't create or recreate anything good.
6th gen has an unmatched visual clarity that no other generation can compare to. I cant explain why in words.
I'm usually the type that think old good and new bad but in this case new is way better. They did a good job.
Le old le good
Le new le bad