Why does Warhammer III have so many more player than II?
Is it actually worth playing?
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Why does Warhammer III have so many more player than II? Is it actually worth playing?
Why does Warhammer III have so many more player than II?
Is it actually worth playing?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Yeah it's great.
yeah
use mods to fix the broken shit
what mods do you recommend
The uninstall wh3 and reinstall wh2 mod
he is asking about warhammer 1 you moronic frick
oh wait i am the moron i thought i was in another thread
fricks sake why are there so many total war threads
i recommend the community bugfix patch, the gun reloading animations one and the smoke and lightning mod
rent free
>white knighting for basedboys
>getting offended at this image
>using a switch
>basedboys
You're not fitting in, newbie. At least learn to avoid the word filters like everyone else before trying.
go to sleep volound
warhammer is extremely soi also who is volound? /vst/ poster?
You were saying basedboy?
White genocide is justified and necessary.
It's been improved somewhat and has the proper map now. 2 is a tighter game but it's been played to death by most people.
People actually have to be playing and at least somewhat enjoying 3 to be angry about their shit DLC polices for it.
Actually, why is there a spit trail attached to the meat? Was he just sucking on it like a lollipop?
Because that shit happens sometimes when you bite things, moron. Are you 5 years old? How can anyone be this inexperienced at life?
Ogres, demons, warriors of chaos, Chorfs, Kislev and China are why more people play it. If you like or want to fight any of them, it's worth getting
thank you anon, now I know to just avoid this goyslop
Okay
nta but saving that very good duck cuz it's a good duck
>I showed you my duck now answer me
Because it's an updated and upgraded version. It's better than TW:W2. The fact alone that you don't need previous games to play Immortal Empires makes it better.
Butthurt around it is in majority related to underwhelming new updates and dlcs. Aesthetic and gameplay design of Cathay and Kislev are questionable as well
>dont need previous games
ca shills blatantly lieing now, getting desperate I see
?
They changed IE. TW:W1 and TW:W2 are no longer required to access this campaign map. You don't need to buy all three games at once in order to have nonshit campaign map in game 3.
Aye. But if you want to play any non-game 3 faction then you will have to buy one of the previous games and/or their DLCs if you want to say play as Tomb Kings or Vampirates.
Yeah, that's obvious. You can play IE with TWW3 lords.
It's straight superior. Significantly improved sieges alone make it better. Improved diplomacy, allied units and qol features make it better. More enemies to kill make it better. Full sized world map makes it better. New provinces in already existing map make it better. Alive modding community which now also works on new campaign maps is better. Reworked factions make it better. Chaos Warriors in particular are now playable. New mechanics make it better. It's an improvement in every way.
holy shit what a shill post. Is this copy pasted?
>someone praises a game i don't like : shill
>someone praises a game i like : genuine opinion
not him but jesus christ the absolute state of this board
its more the way its worded, not that he is praising it specificially. A lot of what he has typed is exactly what CA themselves pat themselves on the back for. Making it suspicious.
For example, praising sieges and "new" provinces in old ones. No one thought the new sieges were an upgrade, theyre boring. A new layout didnt change the AI siege behavior. And the "new" provinces are mostly old ones condensed
you're trolling
the old sieges were pure ass, while 3 could've done way better in that regard they are still an upgrade with huge layouts and sieges actually go back and forth now
>sieges go back and forth now
How? Not considering online play against a real human. The AI does the same exact shit every time just like 2
Just because you "can" play IE without 1 and 2 does not make it better. You still have to purchase the dlc to play any lord besides the handful in 3s base game.
And the constant bringing up of that IE fact is also suspicious. CA loves to praise themselves for that one too when at IE release you still had to purchase the first games. Only after pushback was it made "free"
this is terrible bait
You're terrible at shilling
>only after pushback was it made "free"
now that you mention it is kinda sus, ive seen posters praising wh3 for this exact reason a more than a few times recently.
>Just because you "can" play IE without 1 and 2 does not make it better.
It does. If you want to be a moralgay paypig and you buy 2, you still have to buy 1 to play Mortal Empires. Otherwise you are stuck with Vortex.
TW:W1 is significantly inferior in terms of content, mechanics and qol by now and was rendered pointless by TWW2 as well.
TW:W3 is a better deal than TW:W2 and TW:W1 now for moralgays. You have all new stuff from TW:W3 and everything from previous games as enemies and npcs and don't need at all to buy previous games to access giga campaign map
If you want to creamapie everything then TW:W3 is also better, because you can have everything in price of a single game.
I have no idea if it's possible to pirate TW:W3 yet, but if it is, then it is too preferable to pirating TW:W2
>You still have to purchase the dlc to play any lord besides the handful in 3s base game.
So what? It's this same with any other Total War. Or any game in general. You can't play expansion content without acquiring it somehow, either by buying or pirating. You won't have playable TW:W1 factions in TW:W2 without buying either
What do you want? That they make dlcs free? Yeah it would be better for customers if everything was free, but it's not going to happen. At best there could be a time gated chance to get one dlc for free. I remember they gave away Grim and the Grave for free once.
>And the constant bringing up of that IE fact is also suspicious.
Yes, it's one good decision that they made and it made TW:W3 worth buying now that you don't have to suffer RoC. Game was essentially without a campaign map to play before, RoC is THIS BAD. And disabling Chaos portals shit didn't change much, because layout of the map fricking sucked. There is nothing to do on that campaign map without storyhomosexualry and 1/3 of already small map is simply inaccessible with story disabled. IE becoming free shouldn't need explaining to CA. Mortal Empires also should work this same.
No one on earth wants to play as the chaos lords, cathay, and kislev every single time. Therefore the DLC is not optional. To enjoy IE you still have to spend hundreds of dollars, so no it isnt "free"
And muh cream.api isnt an excuse because statistically only third worlders pirate. The majority of people purchase the games and dlc. So while it might be a better option in that scenario it does not represent the full picture.
Anyone that has spent money on Wh1 and 2 should just keep playing 2. It is objectively a better more filled out experience. Especially considering WH3 has been out for 2 years now and only has 3 dlcs. CA has given up on it. You would be wasting money purchasing it for 10 new lords at best.
not him but in the case of warhammer 2 you still need a dlc to enjoy it too? since you wont get the full campaign without it
i dont get your point, you seem to have none
Youre right. Any respectable person wont purchase wh2 either. But if you are forced to choose between 2 or 3 then you might as well choose 2.
I pirated it, am I respectable?
Its the most sane choice but free shit is still shit in the end whether or not its paid for.
Free for get any shitty malware, right anon?
so basically your mental gymnastics lead to this
you are not a fan of wh2, you are just a falseflagging autistic homosexual that argue in bad faith
got it
>No one on earth wants to play as the chaos lords, cathay, and kislev every single time
Ah so it's a choice of factions that bother you so. Well, Bretonnia is playable as well and others are up to players preferences.
>To enjoy IE you still have to spend hundreds of dollars, so no it isnt "free"
It's free in regard of being playable. I had no care for furgays, scalies, vampirates and mummies but TW:W2 was worth it anyway due to mechanical updates and new content for more interesting TW:W1 races. Same thing with TW:W3
>Anyone that has spent money on Wh1 and 2 should just keep playing 2.
I did so and I don't regret updating. I don't want to ever again look on a 1wall sieges and other too many features TW:W3 offers that make it impossible to go back
>It is objectively a better more filled out experience
But it isn't. This is the point. TW:W3 has a lot of new content even discarding LLs. From minor stuff like ability for flying units to land to diplomacy, improved sieges and new mods.
>Also TW:W3 is putting a lot of effort to anything of the Chaos side.
i wish they ported some of teh content back to wh2 or even wh1, would love to play as kislev in wh1
>TW:W1 is significantly inferior in terms of content, mechanics and qol by now and was rendered pointless by TWW2 as well.
not really
sure it lack things but also it play different mainly to how it handle colonization
I much preferred how TW1 played. I liked the idea of not being able to take settlements that you logically just would never need or use. It also meant that there was like an empire building phase of the campaign followed by basically a crusade phase where you went out and razed everything you couldn't settle. It was neat.
i just wish that getting vassals(or reliable trade routes) would be easier
you forget that plenty of people bought wh1 or wh2 before wh3 was released, if you okay with waiting then wait till warhammer end of times edition all in one
Yeah, in fact just wait 15 years for the VR General’s Edition. Just wait man wait forever and then one day it will finally be perf-ACK!
How is this a shill post? TWW3 is simply better mechanically. It's an improvement in this regard. Previous two Warhammer games have those utter abomination 1-wall sieges. It alone makes them unplayable and redundant now that better version is available. There is no way that I will ever return to those.
This does not excuse CA's moronation with Hyenas, other secret projects, bugs, Realms of Chaos being so terribly designed that it made game unplayable until IE released (which was late anyway), underwhelming dlcs and updates, making Pharaoh nobody asked for, botching design of Kislev and Cathay and other things.
But yeah, TWW3 is simply better and IE can be played now without a need for other 2 games.
>Chaos Robie
That guy is a crazy miracle maker and I can't wait for this ginormous campaign map.
It's up
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3047919903
Now I wait for the rest. For now this must suffice.
But in all honesty, the trilogy would've been even better if the world was cut up into theaters of war the same way Empire was but with a much more fluid transition between maps.
Agree.
Current map is pretty good unlike the mortal empire map which i always hated, but the sea is still WAY too small and the old world way too big in comparison to the new world.
>but the sea is still WAY too small and the old world way too big in comparison to the new world.
Yeah. Would also want the legendary continent of Lumbria, Naggaroth and Lustria a tad bigger (same with Southlands), Cathay being also a tad bigger and with more settlements as well as Nippon and Tor Elithis isles being finally included.
But for now I really want Ind and Khuresh to become available and with the Immortal Empires expanded it's now available until they go and make it official.
And in case of seas they should not only make the seas bigger but also add in small aquatic settlements for Vampire Coast armies.
>Significantly improved sieges alone make it better.
You couldn't even make one argument before going full moron. The sieges are fricking shit. You literally just walk one unit into the capture point and it's over.
Allied units and more enemies to kill are the only true parts of your post. It's not a full sized world map, they shrunk each of the maps to make IE. If it were actually all 3 maps then it'd be a different story but right now with 3 different races and 6 different legendary lords a stones throw away from each other it's obviously too fricking small.
You still have to purchase every single dlc from previous games if you want to play as every lord. You are locked to a total of 5 (five) lords only in base game warhammer 3 with dozens of lords unplayable until you purchase the dlc.
And no, cream.api is not an excuse when the majority of morons dont use it
Who the frick gives a shit if you can't be any of the real WH factions with 3?
ywnhaa
>updated
>upgraded
its a worse version of wh2. buggy unoptimized mess. Do not buy it. Just play wh2. Especially since wh3 support ends this year thanks to CA killing themselves after hyenas and pharaoh flop
you need to upgrade your pc man
Why would I upgrade to play a worse game?
you can't talk shit about optimization when you are running third world hardware
I actually have played wh3 and it runs great on my pc. Its still a buggy unoptimized mess. Wh2 is still the better game and always will be since wh3 is dead.
You need to upgrade because nobody wants to hear you whine about a mid-requirements game running like shit on your ten year old 970 you stupid peasant
>your ten year old 970
I have a 970 and it runs TWWH2 perfectly fine. Do you think graphics have changed at all in the last decade? They haven't.
Despite all the shittery from CA, WH3 is still an objective upgrade to WH2.
This, they included so many more ways to spend money now, i mean vote with our wallets
Because game 3 has all the stuff the two previous games have if you bought them and any DLC.
Problem is that there ain't enough still.
Chaos Dwarves are great, especially with limit removing mods.
More stuff and also it's newer. As people said, 2 has been kinda played to death by comparison.
If I have WTW1, should I get 2 or 3? Does any of it improve the base factions of 1? I haven't even finished a base campaign, and I'd like to get the best experience with empire and all
if you want to play the races introduced in in a game you have to buy that base game and install it too.
so to play with everything you have to buy all three plus dlcs
Ye I know but if I understand it well, latter games also change previous factions in some capacity and W1 factions might have better mechanics in (im)Mortal empires. Prolly will get the 2, since I don't care much about 3 factions.
Let me rephrase it, is there a reason to buy Warham 2 or 3 if I wanna play dwarves or empire? Will it make those campaigns better?
Yeah, they were both heavily reworked. Their campaign mechanics are very different. And they are both due to rework soon in TW:W3 and will be accompanied by dlc.
Admittedly I found Empire rework annoying. TWW1 office system was replaced with Elector Count system where you can appoint your lords as rulers of every province, which will give you buffs and unlock unique units. That's ok I guess, but they also introduced weird authority system which punishes you for attacking other Imperial factions and spawns enemy armies out of nothing that raze other Imperial cities unless you pay money or authority mana to stop it. Wulfhart dlc was very shit. Units are frankly useless and what's worse boring. I don't like that Gelt moved to Solland either.
In TWW3 Volkmar now starts in Sudenburg and has to crusade Undead Vampires (Manfred who also fricked off there) and Tomb Kings. He shares with Manfred now some mechanic about collecting books.
Dorfs got 2 reworks in TWW2, but no dlc. There is a new Legendary Lord for them, rune "magic" works in different way, they got additional Slayer unit, Ungrim as his own faction, they have item crafting mechanic just like tomb kings now. In TWW3 White Dorf leads his own faction in North America and is there to kill Malekith
OK thanks, so def TWW2 for me.
>Why does Warhammer III have so many more player than II?
Considering it's just an expansion of WH2, the fact that ANYONE is still playing WH2 at all is damning evidence that it's not worth it.
>""""ANYONE""""
Is this supposed to mean something? I don't think you're using that right, newbie.
Are there any good mods for Warhammer 2?
I dunno I pirated it and 90% of the mods are only on Steam. I've heard of a few that are pretty popular, like the Legions of Nagash.
III should be better. I played II, was trash, when back to call of Warhammer and medieval 1.
why do they provide you with internet access at the retirement home
I can't believe they still haven't fixed the siege pathing. Put up one ladder, and it's impossible to march forces through an open gate without babysitting them and manually sending them through one at a time. Even that doesn't always work and the unit will path to a ladder on the other side of the map instead.
i remember this bug since rome 1
i have no clue how they manage to have the same bugs since a previous engine
It wasn't in Rome 2 or WH2. They reintroduced it for WH3. Even though WH3 was marketed on siege battle improvements, they managed to make them even worse than ever.
Sieges are so frustrating. If a ladder goes up, 90% of your effort and attention for the rest of the siege will be microing units to go through the gate, otherwise half your army will queue up to use one ladder.
Frick this game.
Where's the cracked warhammer 2 with all dlc? Fitgirl is missing one
I still have no idea why there are three different Warhammer TW games
Each one is focused on a different part of the map. Its basically like expansion packs but more expensive because CA are israelites.
>because CA are israelites
This is all you needed to say. The rest of what you posted has no relation to what he asked.
It has god tier coom mods
Fancy throwing some links?
Look for lazy icarus on loverslab
Found it already, wew they even have a wiki set up
https://lewdhammer.miraheze.org/wiki/Lewdhammer_Wiki
I never played WH2 or 3 but now it got my interest