Why doesn't anyone talk about this game?
Wasn't this game supposed to revive the rts or something?
Why doesn't anyone talk about this game? Wasn't this game supposed to revive the rts or something?
Why doesn't anyone talk about this game?
Wasn't this game supposed to revive the rts or something?
its not even beta you dumb gay, what is there to talk about
not released and it's a clone of WC3 with SC2, at least that's what it looks like. I don't know, I'm not sure if I want to play this game.
I hate how this shitty E-sportbait is the closest we'd ever get to a proper WC4
They would need the same team to make it good though or it would be WC4 just in name.
>Why does no one talk about a game that's not out
We don't even know what the 3rd faction will be.
Second alpha just started, surely someone will leak some real gameplay?
Not much about it has come out yet and a lot of people don't give it a shit because it looks bland. Generic sci-fi shit with no real exciting artstyle or anything to set it apart from a budget SC2 that plays a bit slower. They'll cater to the 1v1 esports minority crowd first and the broader potential playerbase second, so it will probably flop for that very reason.
Pretty sure pvpgays are the majority
But it’s doomed anyways, there’s no way a rts in 2023 can rival with mobas and shooters to the pvp/esports audience
>Pretty sure pvpgays are the majority
Not even close, they are a tiny minority. The majority of people playing RTS games play them for campaigns, comp stomps and custom maps. When WC3 is discussed how often do you see people talking fondly about grinding Skirmish matches? It's all about the campaign, footman frenzy or some other custom map.
delusional Black person, all rts alive today are purely pvp games
So WC3 staying alive for a decade and a half until the disastrous remaster was overwhelmingly due to how popular the 1v1 competitive ladder was? You actually deny that the game doesn't have a legendary reputation for its custom game scene?
yes wc3 tf was alive purely cause of pvp, even the asshomosexuals maps for morons who couldnt play normal ladder are pvp. Nobody plays singleplayer campaign in rts for 20 years.
>even the asshomosexuals maps for morons who couldnt play normal ladder are pvp
Oh so you're just using moronic definitions by including the custom map scene into the 1v1 asiaticclick hypercompetitive elo ladder group.
>asiaticclick
opinion discarded have a nice day Black person
>autists hogging server space keep the game 'alive' not the 4x as many people who bought the game to play it like normal human beings
Lol
lmao even
>all rts alive today
All two of them?
>muh ded gaem
Played a bit of S3 SP two-three weeks ago. Very charming, but A.I. is severely lacking. Looked up multiplayer scene... and it both exists and is somewhat active based on how fast I was able to hop into the match.
The downside - the gay discord soft req., but can't have it all, right?
Whats with this specific example you might ask? Well, that's my experience with every older game not talking about recent ones.
It's like the games doesn't even exist for zoomers unless they have 100k viewers on some guys twtich stream.
Personally I prefer RTS for the pvp, and I hate all the shitposting, but pvp focus in a new RTS is a major red flag to me.
The reason old RTS games fell off, and new ones consistently fail, is because most potential players are not into the competitive pvp.
That market is already more or less saturated by SC2 and AOE2 (maybe some supcom). New releases are trying to beat those giants at their own game, same mistake all the wow clones made.
They would likely find more success by focusing on both a strong custom game scene and singleplayer campaign.
And that's exactly what successful devs went with. All those town builders, map painters, defense games, deck-building autobattlers and whatever are thriving just fine.
MOBAs also cornered the team pvp aspect
> pvp focus in a new RTS
its bullshit PR talk, for example sc2 designers said it was a mistake to make game for esports first before making it fun to play, yet the same people designed dogshit unmicrable units like Thor, colossus and make half of the units feel clunky and not fun to use, also all macro mechanics are unbalanced since the inception and break the game creating terrible dynamic where 1 race feels massive pressure to win early or it automatically loses. The problems had nothing to do with esports but with designers being incompetent fricks who had no idea how to make a good RTS game.
>hey remember how you could have max 3 larvae per hatchery and it created an interesting macro dynamic where more unit production means a severe economic investment and mastery of spawn timing cycles?
>nah frick that here's a skill you autofire each minute that shits out 20 more for free, on demand
frick starcraft 2. not to mention
>protoss... protoss designs... wait I KNOW
>ORB
>ORB RACE
>EVERYTHING IS ORB
>PROBES ARE ORB
>LITTLE ORB ROBOT THAT SPAWNS ORB OBSTACLES
>WALKING ORBS WITH LASERS
>FLYING GLOWING ORBS THAT DELETE PEONS
>WE'RE VERY EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE LEGACY OF THE VOID WITH A NEW ORB UNIT THAT FEATURES ORB-BASED AOE ABILITY
You're a lazy shill. At least bring a morsel of new info to give some material to those who care enough to hate on this.
It's not done, for one thing. But the bigger thing is that no one really WANTS it. They just want there to exist a Blizzard RTS replacement for the sake of its own existence.
what is there to discuss? It's WC3 with D.Va vs Diablo skin
theres almost no information about it, the gameplay looks like offbrand wc3 mixed with sc2 with none of AAA polish, why would i be excited for something like this
All we know about it is that WE WANT THE BLIZZARD SHIT EATER AUDIENCE and STARCRAFT 2 BUT MARVEL which is not a very exciting combination
it also looks like it's WC3-paced but without heroes, which is just moronic
does it really not have heroes? WC3 was entirely built around them and what made the game interesting in first place
Because they showed like one heavily edited match and we know very little about it. Blizzdrones have been shilling it as second coming of christ but it looks more like a budget WC3/SC2 clone. Only "influencers" had any access to the game at all.
Don't know what it is, cover art looks like cancer, is downright repulsive and so annoys me to see in catalog. As such I will not bother to investigate further and instead I will hide/filter any thread about it from now on.
>Why doesn't anyone talk about this game?
because it's not out. and actually, i signed up for beta or whatever, still no word
No one but streamers got into the alpha test, so there's nothing to talk about.
>Why does no one talk about a game that's not out
simple it's another SC2 like clone. Every "new" rts game comes out it's just try to copy SC2 rather than copy Empire at War, CoH1/2 or C&C 3
>ather than copy Empire at War, CoH1/2 or C&C 3
nobody plays those pile of shit games, you had coh3 recently why didnt you play it lmao
>Every "new" rts game comes out it's just try to copy SC2 rather than copy Empire at War, CoH1/2
that would take effort, Iron Harvest fricked up and now nobody will touch this stuff
>or C&C 3
there's a ton of c&c clones in production
kys moron and coh3 is worse than coh1 in every way, even physical (release)
Tons of cnc clones with terrible path finding in 2023. Meanwhile sc2 from 2010 still has better path finding than your cnc dog shit clones.
Wow all the games you listed combined still have less players than sc2 and aoe2. There’s a reason why StarCraft/Warcraft and AOE are still alive stay bad and play single player nerd.
Cannot wait for the next CnC game by the "shitty" EA, starting with the "traitor sellout" know as Ryukishi70...
Actually ever rts dev tries to shit on StarCraft and make a safe boring version of rts with no player choice. Every time a dev shits on StarCraft you know the game is going to be trash. Look at iron Harvey not even a fricking tactic game it’s so bad.
If they all trying to compite with the shooters CoD, Battlefield, and Medal of Honor (gonna put this because frick it, why no), at least they have the excuse of why they so fricking unnoriginal, since that genre is overexploited today.
But fricking RTS, sorry, but there´s not any excuse.
buy stormgate monitor
Will buying the monitor make me trans?
>the game we are all waiting for - STORMGATE
Speaking for others is rude.
We finally got some actual gameplay.
Thoughts?
human vanguard is a far better name than resistance i hope they stick with it
I agree, but everyone will just call them Humans.
>neutral camps
>everything takes 5 minutes to kill
>no visual clarity in big fights
Boring, still hope I'm in the next alpha
>neutral camps
I like it, forces you to get out of your base and fight for some objectives. And if you don't and decide to play SimCity instead, you'll fall behind.
>everything takes 5 minutes to kill
Kinda worried about it too. Gameplaywise I've always hated how you could lose your entire army in 2 secs because you were not looking at it(even happens to pro often). But as a spectator, this is not really exciting to watch at the moment(at least compared to pro. sc2)
>I like it, forces you to get out of your base and fight for some objectives
why not just fight the enemy and kill him and destroy his base, the purpose of every rts
Because of defender's advantage. Most people will just turtle as much as possible and focus on macro because it's easier and optimal at lower levels.
nice game theory that can't be applied to real life anon. If you turtle as much as possible, you cede map control and get raped in every facet of gameplay by the better player.
Very true, but you can always expand to your naturals while turtling. In most game it's enough to hit max army pop(and again I'm talking about your average game, not diamond and above).
If you don't expand in any RTS, you lose in multiplayer. Giving map any sort of map control is a bad idea
i hate this color style, it looks like mobile game
those little cars look fricking moronic
it's a placeholder asset
i hope so
art style looks like wc3 reforged but worse
>devs are discordBlack folk
Not sure about them taking over the RTS competitive scene, but, honestly, doesn't look too bad. Which was expected.
What I'm certain of is though, that the story and lore will be both woke (the special Cali flavor of it) and lame.
Pretending to really play a RTS in multiplayer constantly like a shooter, right westerner?
can you have a nice day already and not shit up every rts thread
Go frick a Slaaneshi demon, shit of man.
Suicídate tu, coreano hijo de puta.
looks like bootleg warcraft 3, terrible
that's not storm rising
Do you mean the OTHER PILE OF SHIT?
they are trying to make a good esports game, instead of making a game that is good. That is why it will fail.
Also looks like the most generic, uninspired world. Bet it will barely have any story too.
Looks cool. Hope I get into the alpha.
It's a Warcraft 3 ripoff. The pacing is very slow. It's for plebs.
Warcraft 3 is the only Blizzard RTS I really like and this game doesn't interest me at all.
They aren't even ripping off the good one (RoC), their main level designer is from Frozen Throne, which is full of gimmick levels. At least we know there is a chance there won't be heroes since most of the team is from SC2.
Frozen Throne is a straight upgrade from RoC unless you really think item spam that the opponent cannot see and creeping to level 10 are good ideas.
>At this point we all know what this pointless game made by shitty fat nerds left overs of Blizzard main and only objective is gonna to be anon...
This game has an interesting aproach of trying to appear the North Koreans instead of the South Koreans.