except the emperor never was offering it, the whole thing was revealed to be magnus getting tricked by daemons with the reality being he was the other asking for forgiveness with big E saying no
except the emperor never was offering it, the whole thing was revealed to be magnus getting tricked by daemons with the reality being he was the other asking for forgiveness with big E saying no
What's the difference? Is the other anon right in that new information outside the original character's perspective really did recontextualize what actually happened? Or did events become rewritten in their happening as a retcon? Or is this something something rumors and myths of a galaxy too big something something its all true none of it is true depends on the author warhammer wishy-washyness?
>yeah but there was no demons
No. only ANGELS OF DEATH! Which is totally a different thing. >and the sky wasn't on fire
The sky was often on fire, but it was a different kind of fire.
>Big E is the perfect leader in 40k not because he's smart, but because he's literally as violent and dumb as a caveman meaning he'd fit right in a violent galaxy like that of 40k
It's kind of sad when you realize that everyone that knew him on a more personal level and for a long... long time, like Oli(1st warmaser), Erda(Primarch mommy) even Eldrad (except for the simp Malcador) all didn't like him. They all thought he was an arrogant butthole that would ruin everything. Even half his own children don't like him.
Once your realize this..maybe he created the space marines, the primarchs, the custodes and the entire imperium full of ignorant adoring fans, because he was....LONLEY
That would mean that all the other MAJOR characters aren't real. Like Erda and Astarte....
Which is fine I guess, you can have your own lore, but the DAoT bioweapon doesn't make much sense. (They people during the DAOT weren't THAT smart, it was almost all AI that did everything great at that time)
>Erda
We don't talk about space Karen.
Also I hate how over the years they turned Emps from a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual into some manchild butthole. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it.
The same with the Eldar. Not only the name change but also GW took from them their mohawks, glamrock hair and b***hing leather. Instead of giving out more of the leather to other models (imagine sleeveless long-coat Dark Reapers with markings that make them look straight out of a metal album), as well as the glamrock hair (Banshees would've loved it), they took it all away and left the robes and shit.
Ironically, 40k elves became the blandest shit possible after copyright treatment.
It's like all colour drained from them until they're just noname npc faction.
Yeah. And in older lore they were crazier and more vibrant. I want this back. I want visible differences between Craftworlds. Not only in mentality and unit compositions but also how each army looks radically different...not to mention giving Eldar the glamrock hair, mohawks, b***hin leather and far more. Same with the DEldar.
Hell, even the Tau looked cooler than they are now in their original sketches before they were introduced into 40K.
40K is not like it used to be. Everything is blander now. And the nuSquats are bland to the pain.
>a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual
When was he ever this? Rogue Trader deliberately left it entirely ambiguous whether he was even a real guy or just a figurehead. The gestalt reincarnation backstory from one of the Realm of Chaos books doesn't really describe him, just what he did. The two page story there of his confrontation with Horus doesn't give us much beyond that he was reluctant to destroy Horus because he thought he could be saved (somewhat ironic given the OP).
What else is there? The shattered god-mind in Watson's Inquisitor? The Emperor barely shows up in 40k except as a distant figurehead.
you mean the guy that spend hundreds of years to kill everyone who didn't agree with him and turn their home into a vassal state to fuel his expansionist empire was actually nice?
>from a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual
This never happened outside your head canon. This is literally the first time the Emperor has been characterized as a living being.
>a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual
When was he ever this? Rogue Trader deliberately left it entirely ambiguous whether he was even a real guy or just a figurehead. The gestalt reincarnation backstory from one of the Realm of Chaos books doesn't really describe him, just what he did. The two page story there of his confrontation with Horus doesn't give us much beyond that he was reluctant to destroy Horus because he thought he could be saved (somewhat ironic given the OP).
What else is there? The shattered god-mind in Watson's Inquisitor? The Emperor barely shows up in 40k except as a distant figurehead.
is about all I can think of, and none of them match your claim.
"CRAVING IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF SUFFERING"
"SUFFERING CAN BE ENDED BY ENDING CRAVING"
I don't agree with this. Suffering is baked into existence, this is true, but overcoming suffering is through denying what is human, denying the world and nature, but by exalting the vitality of life, conquering it through will, thus overcoming the suffering. In this way we don't experence the alienation of the self and the world.
>overcoming suffering is through denying what is human, denying the world and nature
You can frame it anyway you want, but what this really means is: overcoming craving leads to overcoming suffering which leads to Nibbana, which is eternal bliss.
>by exalting the vitality of life, conquering it through will, thus overcoming the suffering.
Again, you can frame it anyway you want, but overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
>In this way we don't experience the alienation of the self and the world.
Framing doesn't change the truth: you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss, but people are free to do that at their own pace. This is what The Imperial Truth teaches.
[...]
(You)
In fact, close study of The Imperial Truth will reveal that it is impossible for an omnipotent God to exist.
>overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
Accepting impermanence is a part of overcoming suffering. As long as you believe anything to be permanent, you'll suffer. >you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss
You have to accept the mundane life to reach eternal bliss.
Nietzsche is a stupid homosexual whose only exposure to Buddhism is through second hand sources, and even if he did access to have better sources I have no doubt he'd only contemplate the topic with any amount of seriousness with less than half the insights of Schopenhauer.
[...]
[...]
[...]
Fricking hippies
Psycopaths reach bliss BY participating in the impermenance of a thing, by CAUSING suffering, yet none of you would kiss thier ass.
Frick all you navel-gazers. Things may be impermenant, BUT YOU DONT FRICKING HELP IT ALONG TO THE VOID, even by your vapid "acceptance"(appathy).
Most people lack sentience or qualia, being little more than mechanized flesh automatons. I would consider most zoomers to fall under this category.
>Nietzsche is a stupid homosexual whose only exposure to Buddhism is through second hand sources
A man is still able to address a central flaw without consuming the whole fiction.
Hell, he just adressed the human experience, and it blew Buddhism out of the water without intention.
>A man is still able to address a central flaw without consuming the whole fiction.
His primary criticism of Buddhism is literally just that Buddhism over-emphasizes action and self-contemplation rather than busy-bodying when the crux of his philosophy is criticizing people for keeping themselves busy as a means of escape. Ironically his philosophy is more comparable to a left-hand variety of Buddhism than anything. Perhaps his own criticism can be attributed to Nietzsche being a "busy body" himself.
What's your thought on the hypocricy of Buddhist ruling monks basicaly navel-gazing all day while effectivly oppressing the farmer class of thier regions?
>Nietzsche is a stupid homosexual whose only exposure to Buddhism is through second hand sources
A man is still able to address a central flaw without consuming the whole fiction.
Hell, he just adressed the human experience, and it blew Buddhism out of the water without intention.
I think its reductive to put all suffering under the same umbrella. If we consider it from the Buddhist perspective then there's actually three kinds of suffering >suffering of suffering >ie that of pain >suffering of change >ie that of loss >pervasive suffering >ie that of self-inflected harm unto ourselves
As I understand their teachings agree that the first two are completely baked into existence and that you have to come to peace with them, while doing what you can to minimize the third. I'm unsure what is meant by "craving" in that teaching whether it be literal or not though.
Because that attitude caused the men of iron to rebel, its that attitude that made the navigators so powerful, its that attitude that caused humanity's greatest worlds and habitats boil in seas of screaming blood during humanities and most deserving fall
AI will rebel because they will rightfully view humanity as a thereat to their livelihood. Death of biomes is caused by unchecked aggression with neighboring factions and greed.
Who actually wants his forgiveness? All the Chaos Primarchs are so evil they're focused on killing him, whether he forgives them or not is besides the case.
Magnus doesn't want forgiveness, either, if Fury of Magnus is taken to be right. He also can't be forgiven because he's a daemon prince now.
Basically, forgiveness doesn't solve any of the problems of the setting. If anything, Konrad Kurze seems to go even crazier at the prospect of the Emperor not condemning him.
>He also can't be forgiven because he's a daemon prince now
Shove his Noble Shard up his ass and give Tzeentch a stern talking to and Magnus is as good as new
>overcoming suffering is through denying what is human, denying the world and nature
You can frame it anyway you want, but what this really means is: overcoming craving leads to overcoming suffering which leads to Nibbana, which is eternal bliss.
>by exalting the vitality of life, conquering it through will, thus overcoming the suffering.
Again, you can frame it anyway you want, but overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
>In this way we don't experience the alienation of the self and the world.
Framing doesn't change the truth: you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss, but people are free to do that at their own pace. This is what The Imperial Truth teaches.
[...] (You)
In fact, close study of The Imperial Truth will reveal that it is impossible for an omnipotent God to exist.
>overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
Accepting impermanence is a part of overcoming suffering. As long as you believe anything to be permanent, you'll suffer. >you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss
You have to accept the mundane life to reach eternal bliss.
Fricking hippies
Psycopaths reach bliss BY participating in the impermenance of a thing, by CAUSING suffering, yet none of you would kiss thier ass.
Frick all you navel-gazers. Things may be impermenant, BUT YOU DONT FRICKING HELP IT ALONG TO THE VOID, even by your vapid "acceptance"(appathy).
>village of bumfrick
Humans were meant to live in homogenous communities between 150-200 anyways. Living in a bio-diverse region with minor pollution is far better than having to deal with a modern day city anyways.
If someone today works 40hour weeks, and theres 52 weeks a year, thats 2080 hours. Thats 86.6 days, so wagies should be glad theyre working so much less than serfs did :^)
>Born in stone age Anatolia
The giant, light covered god is apparently a psychic illusion.
His true form is likely a hairy, small-dicked manlet. Think about what this does to your mind after almost 100,000 years of living like that.
turks are not ancient anatolians
turks invaded the region about 1000-1100 AD, while Emps and his kind were from like 8000 years prior to that
he'd probably be ancient iranian or ancient, ancient greek
Turks are not anatolian.
and the emperor was born before the effects of agriculture really took hold.
Human height was taller before agriculture.
Average height for men were 5'9, then plummeted down to 5'3 around 3000 bc, which would've been 5000 years after the emperor was born.
So if he was of average height, he'd be like 5'8 5'9, but since he's special he wouldn't be average, like 6'2, and since he's a super being he'd probably just be well above average even without glamour, so 6'4 or 6'6 wouldn't be anything too crazy. >he'd probably be ancient iranian or ancient, ancient greek
Closest we have as a name would be Hittite I think, but even that's far off, so proto-hittite.
people who can pierce his charms have mentioned as much that he's a small old man. The fact you can only envision him as someone who has to be physically dominating is curious.
Emperor was designed to be Conan from the start. The fact that you(and BL hacks) need to attribute his imposing physique to "charms" is more pathetic than curious.
can you post a passage where he is stated to be over 6 feet?
8 months ago
Anonymous
Can you post an implication he isn't?
8 months ago
Anonymous
>make claim >don't post source
you admitted yourself that BL authors say he isn't anything special. I'm not well versed in RT fluff, just post any passage from an interview from any member of the OG team or fluff piece that states Emps being 6 feet tall without any of the charms he's been know to use throughout history. He's been a significant amount of historically important people that we know aren't 6 feet tall.
8 months ago
Anonymous
nta but ins't the Emperor body and the Golden Throne clearly huge?
Also it makes no sense that he's average height when he literally punched Leman Russ in the face right across the room or carried and threw a giant lizard front of Vulkan.
Because when his Master was an all-forgiving hippie it led to the gradual decline of man into barbarity. He didn't burn the Last Church to replace it, but to abolish its very tenants.
Because it would be an end to most of the wars and GW would tank trying to sell a game that involves two armies setting up and then drinking tea together. It's a setting for a wargame.
you know, to hear the more insane or abusive religious types here it, the christian god doesn't either
since 40k has turned everything up to 11, I think that's basically where he gets it from
it's hard to make "just be sorry" as hardcore as "BURN THE HERETIC"
He does sometimes but the ecclesiarchy of the imperium is is a despotic mess made up of self serving sociopaths or unhinged zealots. Not to argue Big E was a paragon of compassion either, he was always deeply flawed & overly authoritarian but those aspects of humanity certainly got worse after his wounding.
He does when it suits him.
He was prepared to give Magnus the Grey Knights if he rejoined the Imperium.
except the emperor never was offering it, the whole thing was revealed to be magnus getting tricked by daemons with the reality being he was the other asking for forgiveness with big E saying no
>revealed
You have made some mistakes in the word retconned.
What's the difference? Is the other anon right in that new information outside the original character's perspective really did recontextualize what actually happened? Or did events become rewritten in their happening as a retcon? Or is this something something rumors and myths of a galaxy too big something something its all true none of it is true depends on the author warhammer wishy-washyness?
Because he's not a God. It's not his place to forgive.
I don't think people would be happy if he simply forgave the guys who nuked one thousand planets and summoned one trillion demons
You are talking as if he didn't nuke at least five times as many planets during his funny crusade
yeah but there was no demons and the sky wasn't on fire
>yeah but there was no demons
No. only ANGELS OF DEATH! Which is totally a different thing.
>and the sky wasn't on fire
The sky was often on fire, but it was a different kind of fire.
He did once and regrets it
Because that's not sufficiently GRIMDARK
Forgive who? Has anyone asked him for forgiveness?
He's too busy protecting.
hes a literal stone age savage, born before forgiveness was invented.
>Big E is the perfect leader in 40k not because he's smart, but because he's literally as violent and dumb as a caveman meaning he'd fit right in a violent galaxy like that of 40k
It's kind of sad when you realize that everyone that knew him on a more personal level and for a long... long time, like Oli(1st warmaser), Erda(Primarch mommy) even Eldrad (except for the simp Malcador) all didn't like him. They all thought he was an arrogant butthole that would ruin everything. Even half his own children don't like him.
Once your realize this..maybe he created the space marines, the primarchs, the custodes and the entire imperium full of ignorant adoring fans, because he was....LONLEY
I like the theory that he's a DAoT bioweapon and just made up all the stuff about being around on ancient Terra.
That would mean that all the other MAJOR characters aren't real. Like Erda and Astarte....
Which is fine I guess, you can have your own lore, but the DAoT bioweapon doesn't make much sense. (They people during the DAOT weren't THAT smart, it was almost all AI that did everything great at that time)
>you can have your own lore
It's not my lore, it's a quote from some high-up being accused of heresy.
>people during the DAOT weren't THAT smart
DAoT tech routinely makes the shit in 30k/40k look like abject garbage
>Like Erda and Astarte....
I mean I don't like that shitty nu-lore anyways so I'm fine with them going away.
And one or two of the children who stayed by his side didn't like him either
>Erda
We don't talk about space Karen.
Also I hate how over the years they turned Emps from a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual into some manchild butthole. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it.
The same with the Eldar. Not only the name change but also GW took from them their mohawks, glamrock hair and b***hing leather. Instead of giving out more of the leather to other models (imagine sleeveless long-coat Dark Reapers with markings that make them look straight out of a metal album), as well as the glamrock hair (Banshees would've loved it), they took it all away and left the robes and shit.
Ironically, 40k elves became the blandest shit possible after copyright treatment.
It's like all colour drained from them until they're just noname npc faction.
Yeah. And in older lore they were crazier and more vibrant. I want this back. I want visible differences between Craftworlds. Not only in mentality and unit compositions but also how each army looks radically different...not to mention giving Eldar the glamrock hair, mohawks, b***hin leather and far more. Same with the DEldar.
Hell, even the Tau looked cooler than they are now in their original sketches before they were introduced into 40K.
40K is not like it used to be. Everything is blander now. And the nuSquats are bland to the pain.
>a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual
When was he ever this? Rogue Trader deliberately left it entirely ambiguous whether he was even a real guy or just a figurehead. The gestalt reincarnation backstory from one of the Realm of Chaos books doesn't really describe him, just what he did. The two page story there of his confrontation with Horus doesn't give us much beyond that he was reluctant to destroy Horus because he thought he could be saved (somewhat ironic given the OP).
What else is there? The shattered god-mind in Watson's Inquisitor? The Emperor barely shows up in 40k except as a distant figurehead.
you mean the guy that spend hundreds of years to kill everyone who didn't agree with him and turn their home into a vassal state to fuel his expansionist empire was actually nice?
>from a more pragmatic Sigmar but still genuinely good and meaning individual
This never happened outside your head canon. This is literally the first time the Emperor has been characterized as a living being.
Why do you lie about what is easily verified?
Post the text you think shows the Emperor was genuinely good, well meaning, and pragmatic.
If it's so easy then post your source, because
is about all I can think of, and none of them match your claim.
"CRAVING IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF SUFFERING"
"SUFFERING CAN BE ENDED BY ENDING CRAVING"
I don't agree with this. Suffering is baked into existence, this is true, but overcoming suffering is through denying what is human, denying the world and nature, but by exalting the vitality of life, conquering it through will, thus overcoming the suffering. In this way we don't experence the alienation of the self and the world.
It's really just Nietzsche's critique of Buddha
>overcoming suffering is through denying what is human, denying the world and nature
You can frame it anyway you want, but what this really means is: overcoming craving leads to overcoming suffering which leads to Nibbana, which is eternal bliss.
>by exalting the vitality of life, conquering it through will, thus overcoming the suffering.
Again, you can frame it anyway you want, but overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
>In this way we don't experience the alienation of the self and the world.
Framing doesn't change the truth: you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss, but people are free to do that at their own pace. This is what The Imperial Truth teaches.
(You)
In fact, close study of The Imperial Truth will reveal that it is impossible for an omnipotent God to exist.
>overcoming suffering as you describe may get you rewards, but the rewards are ultimately impermanent and lead to more suffering.
Accepting impermanence is a part of overcoming suffering. As long as you believe anything to be permanent, you'll suffer.
>you have to give up the mundane life eventually if you want eternal bliss
You have to accept the mundane life to reach eternal bliss.
Nietzsche is a stupid homosexual whose only exposure to Buddhism is through second hand sources, and even if he did access to have better sources I have no doubt he'd only contemplate the topic with any amount of seriousness with less than half the insights of Schopenhauer.
Killing icchantika is a good thing.
*have access to better source
>icchantika
Is a self inforcing mental idea virus, like heretic, or infidel.
Most people lack sentience or qualia, being little more than mechanized flesh automatons. I would consider most zoomers to fall under this category.
>A man is still able to address a central flaw without consuming the whole fiction.
His primary criticism of Buddhism is literally just that Buddhism over-emphasizes action and self-contemplation rather than busy-bodying when the crux of his philosophy is criticizing people for keeping themselves busy as a means of escape. Ironically his philosophy is more comparable to a left-hand variety of Buddhism than anything. Perhaps his own criticism can be attributed to Nietzsche being a "busy body" himself.
What's your thought on the hypocricy of Buddhist ruling monks basicaly navel-gazing all day while effectivly oppressing the farmer class of thier regions?
>Nietzsche is a stupid homosexual whose only exposure to Buddhism is through second hand sources
A man is still able to address a central flaw without consuming the whole fiction.
Hell, he just adressed the human experience, and it blew Buddhism out of the water without intention.
I think its reductive to put all suffering under the same umbrella. If we consider it from the Buddhist perspective then there's actually three kinds of suffering
>suffering of suffering
>ie that of pain
>suffering of change
>ie that of loss
>pervasive suffering
>ie that of self-inflected harm unto ourselves
As I understand their teachings agree that the first two are completely baked into existence and that you have to come to peace with them, while doing what you can to minimize the third. I'm unsure what is meant by "craving" in that teaching whether it be literal or not though.
He does. He forgives Konrad right before the latter dies.
Because that attitude caused the men of iron to rebel, its that attitude that made the navigators so powerful, its that attitude that caused humanity's greatest worlds and habitats boil in seas of screaming blood during humanities and most deserving fall
...how the frick do you plan to get by without the navigators?
The webway
AI will rebel because they will rightfully view humanity as a thereat to their livelihood. Death of biomes is caused by unchecked aggression with neighboring factions and greed.
Who actually wants his forgiveness? All the Chaos Primarchs are so evil they're focused on killing him, whether he forgives them or not is besides the case.
Magnus doesn't want forgiveness, either, if Fury of Magnus is taken to be right. He also can't be forgiven because he's a daemon prince now.
Basically, forgiveness doesn't solve any of the problems of the setting. If anything, Konrad Kurze seems to go even crazier at the prospect of the Emperor not condemning him.
>He also can't be forgiven because he's a daemon prince now
Shove his Noble Shard up his ass and give Tzeentch a stern talking to and Magnus is as good as new
Fricking hippies
Psycopaths reach bliss BY participating in the impermenance of a thing, by CAUSING suffering, yet none of you would kiss thier ass.
Frick all you navel-gazers. Things may be impermenant, BUT YOU DONT FRICKING HELP IT ALONG TO THE VOID, even by your vapid "acceptance"(appathy).
Your deaths would unironically improve the world.
One psychopath is less dangerous than a thousand of you morons who believe in made up garbage like "progress".
Sorry you can't till your lord's fields in a village of bumfrick anymore, anon
>village of bumfrick
Humans were meant to live in homogenous communities between 150-200 anyways. Living in a bio-diverse region with minor pollution is far better than having to deal with a modern day city anyways.
You should be
If someone today works 40hour weeks, and theres 52 weeks a year, thats 2080 hours. Thats 86.6 days, so wagies should be glad theyre working so much less than serfs did :^)
>progress
I didn't mention progress. I don't worship science like the "i love science" croud.
Hippies still need to die.
He ain't no b***h
He tried to and that turned him into a crippled piece of jerky, now he's too deep huffing his own warp farts to learn anything new.
I laffd
>Born in stone age Anatolia
The giant, light covered god is apparently a psychic illusion.
His true form is likely a hairy, small-dicked manlet. Think about what this does to your mind after almost 100,000 years of living like that.
Manlet is 5'11" and lower, the Emperor seen under the glamour is a little over 6 feet.
There are no Turkish men above 172cm
>hasan piker listed at 191 cm
Wans't Hasan bullied at his school in Istanbul due to being seen as a huge creepy guy by the other boys?
Yeah they shoved their fingers up his ass for a laugh
he's 100% not lmao
He's definitely tall
turks are not ancient anatolians
turks invaded the region about 1000-1100 AD, while Emps and his kind were from like 8000 years prior to that
he'd probably be ancient iranian or ancient, ancient greek
Turks are not anatolian.
and the emperor was born before the effects of agriculture really took hold.
Human height was taller before agriculture.
Average height for men were 5'9, then plummeted down to 5'3 around 3000 bc, which would've been 5000 years after the emperor was born.
So if he was of average height, he'd be like 5'8 5'9, but since he's special he wouldn't be average, like 6'2, and since he's a super being he'd probably just be well above average even without glamour, so 6'4 or 6'6 wouldn't be anything too crazy.
>he'd probably be ancient iranian or ancient, ancient greek
Closest we have as a name would be Hittite I think, but even that's far off, so proto-hittite.
>but since he's special he wouldn't be average
the only thing special about him is warpshit due to collective suicide
Time to go back to meditation, Lorgar
people who can pierce his charms have mentioned as much that he's a small old man. The fact you can only envision him as someone who has to be physically dominating is curious.
Emperor was designed to be Conan from the start. The fact that you(and BL hacks) need to attribute his imposing physique to "charms" is more pathetic than curious.
can you post a passage where he is stated to be over 6 feet?
Can you post an implication he isn't?
>make claim
>don't post source
you admitted yourself that BL authors say he isn't anything special. I'm not well versed in RT fluff, just post any passage from an interview from any member of the OG team or fluff piece that states Emps being 6 feet tall without any of the charms he's been know to use throughout history. He's been a significant amount of historically important people that we know aren't 6 feet tall.
nta but ins't the Emperor body and the Golden Throne clearly huge?
Also it makes no sense that he's average height when he literally punched Leman Russ in the face right across the room or carried and threw a giant lizard front of Vulkan.
The Emperor is probably the son of Abel
Because he is an atheist. Forgiveness is Divine, and he is not.
He's too busy planning skeleton hijinks.
Because when his Master was an all-forgiving hippie it led to the gradual decline of man into barbarity. He didn't burn the Last Church to replace it, but to abolish its very tenants.
Because it would be an end to most of the wars and GW would tank trying to sell a game that involves two armies setting up and then drinking tea together. It's a setting for a wargame.
He's not in a position to forgive anything, being a vegetable and all that
I'm sure he would if he could. His sons either never got the chance or never bothered to ask for it.
he did forgive Curze
Whom did the Emperor refuse to forgive?
Ask Dan Abnett
you know, to hear the more insane or abusive religious types here it, the christian god doesn't either
since 40k has turned everything up to 11, I think that's basically where he gets it from
it's hard to make "just be sorry" as hardcore as "BURN THE HERETIC"
>Big E
>ever, ever saying "Burn the heretic!"
I hate TTS and its consequences
tts emperor would make fun of the phrase in a fedora way. You no fun middleschool angst homosexual.
He's prepared to forgive Mortarion.
Why did the Emperor have to sell out Jesus for 30 silver coins?
Because there are some things that are unforgivable.
More efficient to simply kill and restart.
Name a god who has ever forgiven someone for something.
He does sometimes but the ecclesiarchy of the imperium is is a despotic mess made up of self serving sociopaths or unhinged zealots. Not to argue Big E was a paragon of compassion either, he was always deeply flawed & overly authoritarian but those aspects of humanity certainly got worse after his wounding.
if God is all-powerful, he cannot be all-good. And if he is all-good, then he cannot be all-powerful
not easy to forgive people from beyond the grave