How come it's always possible to tell when something's AI even if there's no obvious errors?
Something about the way it's shaded just always gives it away, like they're covered in vaseline.
>How come it's always possible to tell when something's AI even if there's no obvious errors
It's too detailed, real artists will omit detail where it's not needed. Ai just fully details every element of a piece which looks fricking weird.
>It's too detailed, real artists will omit detail where it's not needed. Ai just fully details every element of a piece which looks fricking weird.
Yeah, just look at all the creases on the gloves, that shit's uncanny the more you look at it.
Completely, completely accurate. Eventually there's going to be a Stable Diffusion interface that tells the machine what to focus detail on instead of trying to make everything look like it was the primary focus of the work
I don't hate AI art but anyone who defends it without accepting that it's in its infancy is a moron.
>How come it's always possible to tell when something's AI even if there's no obvious errors
It's too detailed, real artists will omit detail where it's not needed. Ai just fully details every element of a piece which looks fricking weird.
partially because it's an inane topic for a drawing/render that no sane artist would put the effort into portraying it so genuinely without being paid for it
Confirmation bias/obsession/psychosis
You've trained your brain to reward you when you spot an AI, because of some odd compulsion to prove to yourself that you can.
There's no confirmation bias in regards to this image. It's easy to tell based on minor details alone, like the face, the eyes, the shading, the hands, the hair blending with the clothes, and the lack of symmetry on the clothes. This isn't even an argument about being pro or anti AI, but this is obviously AI art.
Because the image is being generated by a soulless computer program. Despite how much people scream about soul or soulless here, there are also a lot of people who think you can't tell the difference almost instantly, which is pretty fricking sad. being able to tell if an image is AI generated is basically an IQ test.
square has too much leverage. the entire reason disney wanted KH in the first place was to get jap kids into disney so that they would go to tokyo disneyland. KH is literally the only jap made disney product now apart from a random ghibli project every now and then. disney would never rock the boat if it means risking their themeparks
>Mario: On top of being the mascot of Nintendo, is actually utilized for countless games across several genres, many of which are among the most popular and critically acclaimed for the console and sells more than any other Nintendo property by a large margin. Now also has an extremely successful movie and a big theme park attraction. People find the character charming for his happy attitude and adventurous personality, and his funny and iconic voice. >Mickey Mouse: Is just the face and logo of the company and very little else. No modern cartoons of worth, just some shows for toddlers hardly anyone knows exists. No modern movies. No noteworthy video games except Epic Mickey from 2010 which got decent praise but was nothing exceptional nor did it sell well. Mickey is outshined by countless other Disney franchises. Not many people care about the character of Mickey Mouse, he's not that great, he's just very recognizable and just the mascot.
Mickey Mouse is a loser.
With how worthless Mickey Mouse seems to be for Disney, it's as if they fricked with copyright laws beyond recognition not for the ip, but for the three circles logo that was inspired by the ip. It'd be funny if it wasn't one of the main reasons that we are stuck in today's cultureless hellscape
The last thing we need is to give the mouse the incentive to taint even more Japanese companies. This kind of crossover would have made more sense during the Gamecube or Wii eras when Disney actually still cared more about being the go to company for magic and wonder escapism rather than being some soulless hugbox for self righteous white women and their pets.
Why hasn't Disney made a Mario knock-off with Mickey mouse characters? Sounds like a million dollar idea since PS and Xbox don't have Mario type of series
Mostly agree with your post except when it comes to anime. Anime has the advantage of having a far wider range of ips, so it's not explicitly anti male at all tbh. Most shounen are basically set to glorify masculine values like diligence, strenght, ambition and such, and seinen usually treat their characters rather well in general. Sure, there are quite a few that shit all over men, but you are in no way forced to watch it unlike american media which is controlled almost entirely by explicitly anti male and anti white scum
>And anime is not saving anything been noticing too many emasculated male characters for a while now
This has been happening since before you were likely born.
[...]
Mostly agree with your post except when it comes to anime. Anime has the advantage of having a far wider range of ips, so it's not explicitly anti male at all tbh. Most shounen are basically set to glorify masculine values like diligence, strenght, ambition and such, and seinen usually treat their characters rather well in general. Sure, there are quite a few that shit all over men, but you are in no way forced to watch it unlike american media which is controlled almost entirely by explicitly anti male and anti white scum
>anti white scum >Goes on to support a medium that is created exclusively by Japanese for Japanese
And don't pull any of that honorary white bullshit.
You don't know what anti white means, moron. Nips creating media for nips is in no way equivalent to Hollywood scum making media with the explicit purpose of rudiculing and demonizing white people. Plus, when white people are depicted in nip media, they are treated with respect more often than not
>Nips creating media for nips is in no way equivalent to Hollywood scum making media with the explicit purpose of rudiculing and demonizing white people. >Proceeds to compare said media with Hollywood scum
White males need to create media for them, not tether on a medium that doesn't push propaganda just because a VN adaption doesn't have any black people present.
Sure, white males should create media for themselves and shouldn't tolerate media that has the explicit goal of deriding them, which is why I made sure to directly call out anti white and anti male companies like Disney instead of stating that all western media is anti white and anti male. That being true does not make the fact that nip media generally respects white males false. In other words, nip media can be appreciated for its own merit with far less concern for a subversive agenda
>That being true does not make the fact that nip media generally respects white males false. In other words, nip media can be appreciated for its own merit with far less concern for a subversive agenda
Translation: I'm so mindbroken by western media I have to latch onto eastern media instead of making my own.
it's funny that it took AI to make a nice simple detailed picture of mario and mickey mouse shaking hands. everyone has been so caught up in drawing their stupid OCs that it never occurred to them to do draw something like this
I feel like they have in some one-off commercial or whatever the frick somewhere in a semi-official manner, in an actual game, the closes we have is the Mickey chain in Sora's Keyblade in smash.
>plenty of KH games on nintendo consoles
yeah I don't know it seems like an easy thing but I guess when square runs out of disney IPs they will beg nintendo
How come it's always possible to tell when something's AI even if there's no obvious errors?
Something about the way it's shaded just always gives it away, like they're covered in vaseline.
>How come it's always possible to tell when something's AI even if there's no obvious errors
It's too detailed, real artists will omit detail where it's not needed. Ai just fully details every element of a piece which looks fricking weird.
>Its too detailed
People like you are actual man-children, this looks perfect.
GOOD MORNING SIR
GOOD MORNING SIS
Also what the frick is that gaze Mario has, he looks psychotic.
>with no visible brush strokes
i don't know how you think 2d art is made but it's done on computers now
you can still see strokes on digital art moron
if you do, that's the way it was made to look
you can make shaded 2D art that resembles 3D models with no strokes
airbrush art is generally avoided because it looks like shit
>art is TOO detailed it MUST be a bot!
Sounds like bots are mogging real artists then, lazy fricking shits
the human brain omits details it deems unimportant on it's own already, which is why overly detailed art looks uncanny
>overly detailed
that just looks like shit. AI could do it better
You really have no fricking idea about art and how it's made, do you?
>It's too detailed, real artists will omit detail where it's not needed. Ai just fully details every element of a piece which looks fricking weird.
Yeah, just look at all the creases on the gloves, that shit's uncanny the more you look at it.
No one gives a shit about Mickey Mouse
Completely, completely accurate. Eventually there's going to be a Stable Diffusion interface that tells the machine what to focus detail on instead of trying to make everything look like it was the primary focus of the work
I don't hate AI art but anyone who defends it without accepting that it's in its infancy is a moron.
>The human eye can detect fake art just like it can a fake woman
AIslop is the trannies of art.
People have been trained to recognize certain aspects of AI art that effectively constitute an artstyle.
No sovl, like a perfect circle.
If you can’t tell:
>AI between normal art
>when someone is trying to do you harm
>when you need to see a doctor
Then you are a genetic dead end.
partially because it's an inane topic for a drawing/render that no sane artist would put the effort into portraying it so genuinely without being paid for it
>the way it's shaded just always gives it away, like they're covered in vaseline.
this is what the normal art looks like
No it isn't?
Awful saturation, for the most part.
Or is it because of the same resolution?
AI art, while impressive, is still lacking INTENT. That intent is what makes a piece of art so good.
blah blah blah, people've talked about this ad nauseum. Playing with the AI for a bit is fun too, but I worry about it spamming galleries
ai art has a sort of melted look to it
this is pretty much how i feel, always seems to have a melted or over-aliased look it annoys the shit outta me
lack of style
AI is nowhere near perfected yet for pictures, if this was made by AI there would be a ton of errors. There isn't. Stop with the AI this AI that.
And do you know the most common place it makes mistakes? The hands.
Look at the hands, moron.
The cartoonier things are, the better AI does. Mario and Mickey are pretty easy to get right with so little highly detailed particulars to get wrong
>characters aren't even looking each other in the eye
bruh look at Mickey's ears
because there are errors.
there's subtle little melty errors, proportion and perspective problems that you notice subconsciously.
>DOES ANYBODY ELSE THINK AI IS SO OBVIOUS IM SO QUIRKY AND RANDOM AND NOT LIKE THE OTHER GIRLS XD
someone post the SOVL ai bait and switch image
You can’t tell me this isn’t real.
srhiirp
Confirmation bias/obsession/psychosis
You've trained your brain to reward you when you spot an AI, because of some odd compulsion to prove to yourself that you can.
There's no confirmation bias in regards to this image. It's easy to tell based on minor details alone, like the face, the eyes, the shading, the hands, the hair blending with the clothes, and the lack of symmetry on the clothes. This isn't even an argument about being pro or anti AI, but this is obviously AI art.
Because the image is being generated by a soulless computer program. Despite how much people scream about soul or soulless here, there are also a lot of people who think you can't tell the difference almost instantly, which is pretty fricking sad. being able to tell if an image is AI generated is basically an IQ test.
If you think you can call out 100% of AI art, you're deluding yourself.
if you think hordes of normies can't notice, I've got a bridge to sell you
I'm still trying to understand why it seems to nail lighting
>any AI-generated futa art just has exactly the same copy-pasted dick for all of them
Wow, it's just like watching an actual nyl animation
You guys just suck at AI.
Kek this is shit too. Look at the monocle and the hat placement.
square has too much leverage. the entire reason disney wanted KH in the first place was to get jap kids into disney so that they would go to tokyo disneyland. KH is literally the only jap made disney product now apart from a random ghibli project every now and then. disney would never rock the boat if it means risking their themeparks
Just use a prompt to use a different kind of art style
mario would squash that puny little rat frick
>Mario: On top of being the mascot of Nintendo, is actually utilized for countless games across several genres, many of which are among the most popular and critically acclaimed for the console and sells more than any other Nintendo property by a large margin. Now also has an extremely successful movie and a big theme park attraction. People find the character charming for his happy attitude and adventurous personality, and his funny and iconic voice.
>Mickey Mouse: Is just the face and logo of the company and very little else. No modern cartoons of worth, just some shows for toddlers hardly anyone knows exists. No modern movies. No noteworthy video games except Epic Mickey from 2010 which got decent praise but was nothing exceptional nor did it sell well. Mickey is outshined by countless other Disney franchises. Not many people care about the character of Mickey Mouse, he's not that great, he's just very recognizable and just the mascot.
Mickey Mouse is a loser.
With how worthless Mickey Mouse seems to be for Disney, it's as if they fricked with copyright laws beyond recognition not for the ip, but for the three circles logo that was inspired by the ip. It'd be funny if it wasn't one of the main reasons that we are stuck in today's cultureless hellscape
I want Amy and Minnie to meet instead
Hopefully some AI Masters can them in the prompts
The last thing we need is to give the mouse the incentive to taint even more Japanese companies. This kind of crossover would have made more sense during the Gamecube or Wii eras when Disney actually still cared more about being the go to company for magic and wonder escapism rather than being some soulless hugbox for self righteous white women and their pets.
Why hasn't Disney made a Mario knock-off with Mickey mouse characters? Sounds like a million dollar idea since PS and Xbox don't have Mario type of series
Mario looks like he is ready to kill mickey the second he turns his back
He is
Mostly agree with your post except when it comes to anime. Anime has the advantage of having a far wider range of ips, so it's not explicitly anti male at all tbh. Most shounen are basically set to glorify masculine values like diligence, strenght, ambition and such, and seinen usually treat their characters rather well in general. Sure, there are quite a few that shit all over men, but you are in no way forced to watch it unlike american media which is controlled almost entirely by explicitly anti male and anti white scum
>Ninterd
holy kino
>And anime is not saving anything been noticing too many emasculated male characters for a while now
This has been happening since before you were likely born.
>anti white scum
>Goes on to support a medium that is created exclusively by Japanese for Japanese
And don't pull any of that honorary white bullshit.
You don't know what anti white means, moron. Nips creating media for nips is in no way equivalent to Hollywood scum making media with the explicit purpose of rudiculing and demonizing white people. Plus, when white people are depicted in nip media, they are treated with respect more often than not
>Nips creating media for nips is in no way equivalent to Hollywood scum making media with the explicit purpose of rudiculing and demonizing white people.
>Proceeds to compare said media with Hollywood scum
White males need to create media for them, not tether on a medium that doesn't push propaganda just because a VN adaption doesn't have any black people present.
Sure, white males should create media for themselves and shouldn't tolerate media that has the explicit goal of deriding them, which is why I made sure to directly call out anti white and anti male companies like Disney instead of stating that all western media is anti white and anti male. That being true does not make the fact that nip media generally respects white males false. In other words, nip media can be appreciated for its own merit with far less concern for a subversive agenda
>That being true does not make the fact that nip media generally respects white males false. In other words, nip media can be appreciated for its own merit with far less concern for a subversive agenda
Translation: I'm so mindbroken by western media I have to latch onto eastern media instead of making my own.
Mario met Sora so close enough
Got this Picture when asking for “Dragoon Hunter fighting dragon with the aid of another dragon”
looks like the cover art for some 5/10 ARPG
lmao it's just the boxart for dragon's dogma
Not needed. Disney is a decaying company, while Nintendo is taking the market space that Disney is vacating.
Why would they
Mario's bigger than Mickey ever was.
it's funny that it took AI to make a nice simple detailed picture of mario and mickey mouse shaking hands. everyone has been so caught up in drawing their stupid OCs that it never occurred to them to do draw something like this
I feel like they have in some one-off commercial or whatever the frick somewhere in a semi-official manner, in an actual game, the closes we have is the Mickey chain in Sora's Keyblade in smash.
Mario is racist
they are enemies now and wont ever meet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_animated_films
>plenty of KH games on nintendo consoles
yeah I don't know it seems like an easy thing but I guess when square runs out of disney IPs they will beg nintendo