4 is nice change of pace and fresh air. At least I've already played more than enough aoe2 in this life time.
I don't care for multiplayer stuff and aoe4 campaigns are pretty good. Better than aoe2 campaigns I think.
I was thinking of getting it but I can't get an answer if the campaigns are good.
I'm afraid I'll probably be too bad at aoe2 multiplayer when I try it out so might as well keep going through those campaigns
Is AoE4 any good if you like playing against bots and turtling? I loved doing it in 3, but there were limited defense options. And you needed a mod to build walls over train tracks.
Not really. Not many defensive options. The AI is also overly aggressive, but not very adaptable and has infinite resources, like all of Relic's games. So even on easy they'll be at feudal within a couple minutes and spamming a large group of units at you. If you manage to fight off the early attacks, you'll probably win because their attacks tend to slow down drastically after that. I despise their style of AI. It's unfun garbage in the Company of Heroes games too. Super hard to beat at first, but then way too easy once you figure it out. AoE2 DE's AI is significantly more fun.
No, not unless you're very, very fast to prevent the AI's early rushes. There's not much you can do to turtle in this game anyway, it's not a proper RTS with extensive defensive options and base building mechanics. It's moba-lite garbage like Company of Heroes 2 and Dawn of War 3.
Have they added more content? I liked the campaigns, but overall it's just less content than AoE2. It isn't just civs, it's things like map types and gameplay rulesets, too. I get it's almost absurd at how much content AoE2 has so it's hard to match, but I played AoE4 on release and it seemed that they just kept updating AoE2 instead of improving AoE4 so I just stopped myself.
It's not. It's a shitty attempt at cloning/rehashing AoE2 with a mix of AoE3 and Company of Heroes mechanics. It sucks ass. The AI cheats with infinite resources. The graphics are mobile game tier. It's shit and Relic is a terrible developer.
Because Microsoft are scum. They killed off Ensemble in 2009 after releasing Halo Wars and have been teabagging the corpse of Age of Empires ever since. Relic is basically the only RTS developer left besides Creative Assembly (if the Total War series even really counts) and Petroglyph who usually work with EA and are probably not a big studio anymore.
I agree that Relic's form of RTS are pretty fricking garbage though. I liked Homeworld, Impossible Creatures, CoH 1, and Dawn of War 1 and 2 but they were never really on par with AoE, CnC, and Starcraft. And some of their games are just outright awful like DoW 3 and AoE 4. CoH 3 might eventually be good but I doubt it.
Besides the aesthetics and storylines in the Dawn of War games, their games really do not have anything going for them.
>No base building >garbage overly aggressive AI that cheats >capture point mode instead of the proper RTS mode >low unit caps >automated economy >aggressive monetization
They basically just make moba's. Age of Empires 4 has no appeal to RTS or Age of Empires fans. It's basically as bad as Dawn of War 3.
>blatant lie >don't care, not a compstomper >sacred sites are one of 3 possible victory conditions in a match >200 pop cap just like 2 >outside of not having to reseed farms nothing about the economy is automated >the game has one DLC that adds 2 new factions (each one is more complex than any AoE2) faction and 4 variants of existing factions (each one is also more complex than any AoE2 civ)
Any post that praises Age of Empire 4 is an obvious marketer. Any post that disparages Age of Empires 2 in the process is an idiot on top of that who has no business even discussing this genre, or video games in general.
The frick you are on about?
They are great!
I can't be the only one who creates them in masses just to kill them in the most creative ways possible, haha.
Devs added Turks and Malians in a free patch, and Malians have access to a Dahomean infantry regiment made up of huntresses, who serve as their anti-armor unit.
He got his ass reamed by going for a M@A rush into them, and now he's venting here.
Yes. But only 3 is valid because it was still made by Ensemble. 4 is a dogshit imposter by Microsoft and Relic that poorly emulates the Age of Empires formula with way too many compromising Company of Heroes-esque mechanics like capture points and a lesser focus on base building.
>way too many compromising Company of Heroes-esque mechanics like capture points and a lesser focus on base building
I love it when anons just lie blatantly and people will believe them because no one plays games on Ganker
>oh boy i can't wait to play vikings i want to use their berserk that sounds so cool >have to play crossbowman or lose >never get to use your unique unit
Because Age of Empires 2 fans will literally never talk about anything other than Age of Empires 2. There might as well not be other video games to them, so of course the fourth one will not get attention.
>He doesn't know how to play other comps >Blames the game
>It's inferior to AOE2 in every way
Wrong >Sheep automatically follow scouts >Sheep aren't hilariously slow >Scouts regenerate HP >Scouts yell to you when they spot an enemy >Farms don't deplete >Deep fish regenerate >No jank-ass boar kiting >No jank-ass deer herding >No jank-ass quick walling >No jank-ass scout battles >No more scuffed looking units (sprites and icons) >Landmarks >Influence mechanic >Much greater civ asymmetry, like night and day difference >Interesting, better civs >Variant civs >There's a civ for everyone >Civ specific music, progresses with each age >Farms fit around mill >Farms fit around town center >No more tetris mines >Berries aren't a meme >Resources on mini-map are represented by icons instead of tiny yellow, gray, and green dots >Buildings don't block >Units can go on walls >Can build TCs in Feudal offering more strategy and booming potential >Better unit balance, civ balance, and general game balance >All units and civs are viable >Houses give 10 population >Neutral trade posts >Trade is viable >Cool campaigns and challenges >Scouts different from light cavalry >Light cavalry isn't a useless 1-purpose unit >Isn't a 24 year old game and engine >Game flows smoother >3D >Animations >Base auto decorates >Score doesn't go down when aging up >Buildings not tanky >Units use torches instead of a unit stabbing a building 2400 times to destroy it >Wololo conversion is a giant circle with a count down instead of single target conversion clusterfrick, having to individually click each monk and target and hope RNG favors you >Brand new expansion
>Even all of the old big players like Viper went back to AOE2
I don't care about the smeleegays of the RTS community and neither should you
when i played, there was no "your base is under attack" audio alert, just a random sound effect whenever you were getting hit, regardless of wether it was a little tower off in the woods or your TC. little stuff like that all over relic games that just screams WE DONT PLAY OUR OWN GAME and yeah after coh3 i dont care how good aoe4 might be not a dollar more to relic
>It's inferior to AOE2 in every way
Wrong >Sheep automatically follow scouts >Sheep aren't hilariously slow >Scouts regenerate HP >Scouts yell to you when they spot an enemy >Farms don't deplete >Deep fish regenerate >No jank-ass boar kiting >No jank-ass deer herding >No jank-ass quick walling >No jank-ass scout battles >No more scuffed looking units (sprites and icons) >Landmarks >Influence mechanic >Much greater civ asymmetry, like night and day difference >Interesting, better civs >Variant civs >There's a civ for everyone >Civ specific music, progresses with each age >Farms fit around mill >Farms fit around town center >No more tetris mines >Berries aren't a meme >Resources on mini-map are represented by icons instead of tiny yellow, gray, and green dots >Buildings don't block >Units can go on walls >Can build TCs in Feudal offering more strategy and booming potential >Better unit balance, civ balance, and general game balance >All units and civs are viable >Houses give 10 population >Neutral trade posts >Trade is viable >Cool campaigns and challenges >Scouts different from light cavalry >Light cavalry isn't a useless 1-purpose unit >Isn't a 24 year old game and engine >Game flows smoother >3D >Animations >Base auto decorates >Score doesn't go down when aging up >Buildings not tanky >Units use torches instead of a unit stabbing a building 2400 times to destroy it >Wololo conversion is a giant circle with a count down instead of single target conversion clusterfrick, having to individually click each monk and target and hope RNG favors you >Brand new expansion
>Even all of the old big players like Viper went back to AOE2
I don't care about the smeleegays of the RTS community and neither should you
Age of Empires 4 should have been set in the early modern to the near future period. I don't give a shit about this soulless game riding on the coat tail of AoE2, it's just another game made by bloated studios that don't have an ounce of creativity left in them.
Right, which is why the OP opens up by complaining about how there hasn't been a single aoe 4 thread on the board in a long time. It's "because it's a general".
Your complete lack of reading comprehension isn't surprising anymore. You shouldn't call anyone else an ESL.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>NO U!!!!
show me in the OP of another thread where he says "there is never an aoe4 thread up"
5 months ago
Anonymous
No one but you said that there has never been a single thread for the game on the entire board, you ESL Hispanic. Learn how to read. 4 threads are so dead on /vst/ that people try talking about it in threads for 2 DE. But I'll humor you; the one up right now where the OP complains about no one talking about the game on the board so much that he has to go to reddit to talk about the game instead. Look it up.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>No one but you said that there has never been a single thread for the game on the entire board, you ESL Hispanic.
no, not even i said this. nobody did.
5 months ago
Anonymous
That's what you said was stated by someone else, moron. Despite the fact hat no one but you typed out those words. Holy shit this is next level idiocy.
It's weird. Certainly not a bad game but the deckbuilding mechanic is really unnecessary and a lot of the asymmetry is false asymmetry (i.e. lots of minor statistical differences in the units between factions but functionally they're all used the same).
Fun. I've always liked it. It's not as good as 2, but it is leagues better than 4. It had some interesting ideas involving deck building with different unit and technology cards. If you like the colonial period style warfare, I think you'd get a kick out of it.
I dont really understand the hate this game gets, apparently it had a shit launch/bad first impression but its one of my fave rts the past few years, and yeah I like aoe1/2 as well, haven't played 3. The more unique civs and mechanics of 4 is what I like, and how all the spearmen from the different civs all look different, which is one thing I hated in the other games. Fricking european knights and hussars on non euro civs is moronic. i will agree with the other anon that the ui is indeed souless mobile shit, but I can overlook that for the gameplay. The little bit of woke shit is that some civs have rng women units, like the mongol horse archers can spawn as women. english are all men, french are all men except john dark. campaigns were okay enough but were like documentary style rather than a story, but I did like unlocking the history channel little videos, about culture, military tech, and medieval social life. The hate feels largely undeserved. Am not a Black person shill, just an rts fan.
It had a shit launch and took like a year to fix bugs on shit like basic tech not applying properly. That said the game is pretty fun, each civ has more of a focus on different economies and base building requirements.
But ive been getting into aoeIII lately. that game had some cool ideas. I still dont understand the counter system in the slightest but cards and exploration are neat.
I wish microshit would get off their ass and release the Age of mythology remake already, thats a great game but theres some serious jank in the unit control on it.
>I WANT TO PLAY RTS GAMES! THEY WERE MY FAVORITE GENRE!
>But only in single player. I don't want MP of any kind cuz it's stressing. >Also I want a good story like the epic Red Alert >Also I play in easy mode >Also I don't want to really learn the game, I just want to build my dudes for an hour and then stomp the easy AI >And turtle >And I want to build bases, houses and decorate them >And I don't actually want the tactics, build strats or think in the game cuz that's for tryhards. I want a relaxing game that is ACTUALLY strategy like turn based games. >I actually want a turn based game >I don't want to deal with other players >And le epic Warcraft story too! >Is Cities Skylines an RTS? >If you tell me to git gud I will call you a tryhard and a blowout
>What you mean RTS are dead then?
Every RTS thread. Why are so many guys like this? Why not play a tower defense then?
RTS is dead
it's a boomer genre that deserves to be buried but these Age of gays keep molesting it's corpse.
Just let it go man. It will never come back. There are far better genres now.
They ruined it with the woke bullshit
What is the point of this game when 2 DE exist?
4 is superior to AOE2
4 is nice change of pace and fresh air. At least I've already played more than enough aoe2 in this life time.
I don't care for multiplayer stuff and aoe4 campaigns are pretty good. Better than aoe2 campaigns I think.
Playing the same game over and over for thousands of hours gets kinda stale
the procedural paths are sovl technology. also the audio is awesome.
I was thinking of getting it but I can't get an answer if the campaigns are good.
I'm afraid I'll probably be too bad at aoe2 multiplayer when I try it out so might as well keep going through those campaigns
I fricking hate the UI, I hate the esports graphics and UI
I hate the souless UI
Is AoE4 any good if you like playing against bots and turtling? I loved doing it in 3, but there were limited defense options. And you needed a mod to build walls over train tracks.
Not really. Not many defensive options. The AI is also overly aggressive, but not very adaptable and has infinite resources, like all of Relic's games. So even on easy they'll be at feudal within a couple minutes and spamming a large group of units at you. If you manage to fight off the early attacks, you'll probably win because their attacks tend to slow down drastically after that. I despise their style of AI. It's unfun garbage in the Company of Heroes games too. Super hard to beat at first, but then way too easy once you figure it out. AoE2 DE's AI is significantly more fun.
That sucks. Exactly the type of AI I hate playing against.
doesn't this mean a turtle beats them every time?
He's moronic. Turtling against the AI gets you skullfricked. Early aggro is always the bane against AI and player alike
I'm a beginner, and I've won every match so far by pushing early aggression with english longbows, spearmen, and man-at-arms. (five matches)
No, not unless you're very, very fast to prevent the AI's early rushes. There's not much you can do to turtle in this game anyway, it's not a proper RTS with extensive defensive options and base building mechanics. It's moba-lite garbage like Company of Heroes 2 and Dawn of War 3.
>he's still lying
lel
comparing CoH2 to DoW3 seems hyperbolic.
Yes
Have they added more content? I liked the campaigns, but overall it's just less content than AoE2. It isn't just civs, it's things like map types and gameplay rulesets, too. I get it's almost absurd at how much content AoE2 has so it's hard to match, but I played AoE4 on release and it seemed that they just kept updating AoE2 instead of improving AoE4 so I just stopped myself.
age1 can't be topped
age2 is arguably the same level
It's not. It's a shitty attempt at cloning/rehashing AoE2 with a mix of AoE3 and Company of Heroes mechanics. It sucks ass. The AI cheats with infinite resources. The graphics are mobile game tier. It's shit and Relic is a terrible developer.
how the frick did relic get hands on this ip in the first place, all the games they have made suck mad balls
good or bad they are the only rts developer remaining
>all the games they have made suck mad balls
Company of Heroes, Homeworld and Dawn of War are god-tier RTS and better than your favorite game.
lol
not lol but facts lol
He said Relic never made a good game
If he just said nu-Relic never made a good game then yeah I would probably agree.
the games you listed are either mediocre or outright bad
seethe more, CoH1 is the greatest RTS of all time
Anon, Homeworld came out 40 years ago. Not a single person involved in making it a good game works at Relic any more.
Because Microsoft are scum. They killed off Ensemble in 2009 after releasing Halo Wars and have been teabagging the corpse of Age of Empires ever since. Relic is basically the only RTS developer left besides Creative Assembly (if the Total War series even really counts) and Petroglyph who usually work with EA and are probably not a big studio anymore.
I agree that Relic's form of RTS are pretty fricking garbage though. I liked Homeworld, Impossible Creatures, CoH 1, and Dawn of War 1 and 2 but they were never really on par with AoE, CnC, and Starcraft. And some of their games are just outright awful like DoW 3 and AoE 4. CoH 3 might eventually be good but I doubt it.
Besides the aesthetics and storylines in the Dawn of War games, their games really do not have anything going for them.
>No base building
>garbage overly aggressive AI that cheats
>capture point mode instead of the proper RTS mode
>low unit caps
>automated economy
>aggressive monetization
They basically just make moba's. Age of Empires 4 has no appeal to RTS or Age of Empires fans. It's basically as bad as Dawn of War 3.
>blatant lie
>don't care, not a compstomper
>sacred sites are one of 3 possible victory conditions in a match
>200 pop cap just like 2
>outside of not having to reseed farms nothing about the economy is automated
>the game has one DLC that adds 2 new factions (each one is more complex than any AoE2) faction and 4 variants of existing factions (each one is also more complex than any AoE2 civ)
Anon...you weren't supposed to point that out.
Any post that praises Age of Empire 4 is an obvious marketer. Any post that disparages Age of Empires 2 in the process is an idiot on top of that who has no business even discussing this genre, or video games in general.
Post discarded.
>reddit spacing
Take a bath stinky
>in the end, he failed to respond to the post without sounding mad
It feels too manufactured.
Because it looks like souless goyslop
Because it's shit.
Woke retread of AoE2.
We already had Age of Empires 2. We didn't need Age of Empires 2 2: EGS Edition.
Can you anons explain what makes it woke? Haven't played and I'm curious what they added for this reaction.
Women warriors.
The frick you are on about?
They are great!
I can't be the only one who creates them in masses just to kill them in the most creative ways possible, haha.
women vills
That's it? I was expecting more than that if it's getting called woke.
well, the hi/v/emind will always spew its garbage
Devs added Turks and Malians in a free patch, and Malians have access to a Dahomean infantry regiment made up of huntresses, who serve as their anti-armor unit.
He got his ass reamed by going for a M@A rush into them, and now he's venting here.
How do walls work? I feel like any army can burn through wood and one battering ram can take down a stone wall. Is turtle not viable?
wait... there was an Age of Empires 3 and 4?
Yes and both of them are better and more fun than II
brother are you getting paid or something?
Yes. But only 3 is valid because it was still made by Ensemble. 4 is a dogshit imposter by Microsoft and Relic that poorly emulates the Age of Empires formula with way too many compromising Company of Heroes-esque mechanics like capture points and a lesser focus on base building.
>way too many compromising Company of Heroes-esque mechanics like capture points and a lesser focus on base building
I love it when anons just lie blatantly and people will believe them because no one plays games on Ganker
>/vt/ranny defending Age of Crossbowmen 2
>oh boy i can't wait to play vikings i want to use their berserk that sounds so cool
>have to play crossbowman or lose
>never get to use your unique unit
>he posted it again
Man when your mind gets stuck on something it really stays in that track huh?
It's pretty much true though. If you aren't building crossbows or knights you're playing the game wrong.
Especially if you build melee infantry.
It’s not true. Idk when you last played but the meta has shifted from that a while ago
Meanwhile AOE4 massing infantry (particularly as HRE) is extremely viable
I've never played AOE2, it's a shame it's basically AOE4 but old.
Broodwar is still the king babeeeeeeeeeeee
There are no capture points and base building is expanded over aoe2.
The UI is still shit and the cartoony arrows and spears ruin the soldiers
Because it's not Age of Empires 2.
Nobody cares about RTS except a few grandpas happy to play AoE2 and SCBW until they die
Because Age of Empires 2 fans will literally never talk about anything other than Age of Empires 2. There might as well not be other video games to them, so of course the fourth one will not get attention.
I like other games but as far as AoE goes it’s 2 or nothing so i guess you’re sorta right
It looks like a mobile knock off of AoE2 which is beautiful and timeless. I didn’t even bother to install it when I had gamepass
join
>AOE4
>do the same rush
>do the same build
Painfully boring
Huh?????? That's more like AOE2 because u have to go crossbow every m atch or lose
>He doesn't know how to play other comps
>Blames the game
>List changes
>"These are all improvements btw"
They really should have done something other than "like AoE2 but in 3D".
if they actually did aoe 2 but 3d it might have been a playable game instead of the boring dogshit it is, but they weren't even capable of that
Reminder that 2gays are the Meleegays of RTS games.
Take a bath stinky
>2 has more players on average
what did they mean by this
More thirdies play it which is why the peaks are lower but a lot longer.
The old AoE2 has 3000+ players not shown here
And those people are the most intelligent ones because they aren't playing the dogshit DE and its borked pathfinding.
Old AoE2 pathfinding is even more borked. Go actually play it instead of talking shit on the internet
when i played, there was no "your base is under attack" audio alert, just a random sound effect whenever you were getting hit, regardless of wether it was a little tower off in the woods or your TC. little stuff like that all over relic games that just screams WE DONT PLAY OUR OWN GAME and yeah after coh3 i dont care how good aoe4 might be not a dollar more to relic
>why is woke shit that adds nothing meaningful not discussed here
No clue
cope
>post dow 3 Relic games
I want Spain already. Where's Supremacy?
Because it's complete and total trash. Dumb pajeet shill
It sucks. It's inferior to AOE2 in every way. Even all of the old big players like Viper went back to AOE2 after their contract with MS ran out on 4
>It's inferior to AOE2 in every way
Wrong
>Sheep automatically follow scouts
>Sheep aren't hilariously slow
>Scouts regenerate HP
>Scouts yell to you when they spot an enemy
>Farms don't deplete
>Deep fish regenerate
>No jank-ass boar kiting
>No jank-ass deer herding
>No jank-ass quick walling
>No jank-ass scout battles
>No more scuffed looking units (sprites and icons)
>Landmarks
>Influence mechanic
>Much greater civ asymmetry, like night and day difference
>Interesting, better civs
>Variant civs
>There's a civ for everyone
>Civ specific music, progresses with each age
>Farms fit around mill
>Farms fit around town center
>No more tetris mines
>Berries aren't a meme
>Resources on mini-map are represented by icons instead of tiny yellow, gray, and green dots
>Buildings don't block
>Units can go on walls
>Can build TCs in Feudal offering more strategy and booming potential
>Better unit balance, civ balance, and general game balance
>All units and civs are viable
>Houses give 10 population
>Neutral trade posts
>Trade is viable
>Cool campaigns and challenges
>Scouts different from light cavalry
>Light cavalry isn't a useless 1-purpose unit
>Isn't a 24 year old game and engine
>Game flows smoother
>3D
>Animations
>Base auto decorates
>Score doesn't go down when aging up
>Buildings not tanky
>Units use torches instead of a unit stabbing a building 2400 times to destroy it
>Wololo conversion is a giant circle with a count down instead of single target conversion clusterfrick, having to individually click each monk and target and hope RNG favors you
>Brand new expansion
>Even all of the old big players like Viper went back to AOE2
I don't care about the smeleegays of the RTS community and neither should you
>thirdie struggling to read
Obvious shill is obvious. Why is Microsoft trying so hard do to market this dead game all of the sudden? It's an abomination.
>in the end, he failed to respond to the post without sounding mad
Age of Empires 4 should have been set in the early modern to the near future period. I don't give a shit about this soulless game riding on the coat tail of AoE2, it's just another game made by bloated studios that don't have an ounce of creativity left in them.
>early modern
Frick yourself with a serrated knife
I love medieval go play AOE3
Fight me homosexual.
Ok wait *walls and booms*
>Age of Empires 4 should have been set in the early modern to the near future period
>morons still falling for that meme magazine page
Age of Empires 2 is a whole feel, a vibe. Age 4 looks like a modern gamey game that no one will be talking about in 5 years let alone 10 or 20
I haven't played it but from the looks of it I think the aoe4 devs thought "let's take ideas from starcraft 2 and go wild"
always has a thread up on /vst/
Lmao no, the one up now is the first I've seen in months.
works on my machine bro /shrug its basically a general
Right, which is why the OP opens up by complaining about how there hasn't been a single aoe 4 thread on the board in a long time. It's "because it's a general".
>no thread
>translates to never a thread
ESL.
Your complete lack of reading comprehension isn't surprising anymore. You shouldn't call anyone else an ESL.
>NO U!!!!
show me in the OP of another thread where he says "there is never an aoe4 thread up"
No one but you said that there has never been a single thread for the game on the entire board, you ESL Hispanic. Learn how to read. 4 threads are so dead on /vst/ that people try talking about it in threads for 2 DE. But I'll humor you; the one up right now where the OP complains about no one talking about the game on the board so much that he has to go to reddit to talk about the game instead. Look it up.
>No one but you said that there has never been a single thread for the game on the entire board, you ESL Hispanic.
no, not even i said this. nobody did.
That's what you said was stated by someone else, moron. Despite the fact hat no one but you typed out those words. Holy shit this is next level idiocy.
prove it.
Its just AoE2 remake with less content.
>t. plays against bots on easy
It's actually AoE2 with more interesting civs and unit balance
OK so how good is AOE3?
It's weird. Certainly not a bad game but the deckbuilding mechanic is really unnecessary and a lot of the asymmetry is false asymmetry (i.e. lots of minor statistical differences in the units between factions but functionally they're all used the same).
Fun. I've always liked it. It's not as good as 2, but it is leagues better than 4. It had some interesting ideas involving deck building with different unit and technology cards. If you like the colonial period style warfare, I think you'd get a kick out of it.
t.smeleegay
The best one so far at least you can use more units and not only crossbows.
aoe2gays are insufferable
I dont really understand the hate this game gets, apparently it had a shit launch/bad first impression but its one of my fave rts the past few years, and yeah I like aoe1/2 as well, haven't played 3. The more unique civs and mechanics of 4 is what I like, and how all the spearmen from the different civs all look different, which is one thing I hated in the other games. Fricking european knights and hussars on non euro civs is moronic. i will agree with the other anon that the ui is indeed souless mobile shit, but I can overlook that for the gameplay. The little bit of woke shit is that some civs have rng women units, like the mongol horse archers can spawn as women. english are all men, french are all men except john dark. campaigns were okay enough but were like documentary style rather than a story, but I did like unlocking the history channel little videos, about culture, military tech, and medieval social life. The hate feels largely undeserved. Am not a Black person shill, just an rts fan.
Vee doesnt play video games
It had a shit launch and took like a year to fix bugs on shit like basic tech not applying properly. That said the game is pretty fun, each civ has more of a focus on different economies and base building requirements.
But ive been getting into aoeIII lately. that game had some cool ideas. I still dont understand the counter system in the slightest but cards and exploration are neat.
I wish microshit would get off their ass and release the Age of mythology remake already, thats a great game but theres some serious jank in the unit control on it.
>I WANT TO PLAY RTS GAMES! THEY WERE MY FAVORITE GENRE!
>But only in single player. I don't want MP of any kind cuz it's stressing.
>Also I want a good story like the epic Red Alert
>Also I play in easy mode
>Also I don't want to really learn the game, I just want to build my dudes for an hour and then stomp the easy AI
>And turtle
>And I want to build bases, houses and decorate them
>And I don't actually want the tactics, build strats or think in the game cuz that's for tryhards. I want a relaxing game that is ACTUALLY strategy like turn based games.
>I actually want a turn based game
>I don't want to deal with other players
>And le epic Warcraft story too!
>Is Cities Skylines an RTS?
>If you tell me to git gud I will call you a tryhard and a blowout
>What you mean RTS are dead then?
Every RTS thread. Why are so many guys like this? Why not play a tower defense then?
why arent there more medieval non fantasy themed tower defences?
Seems like a good way to make bank. god devs are morons
Not this time, friend. This is just AoE4 shills being shills, not cowards.
I love AoE4 tho
I am the graetest
I believe in you anon youre the next big aoe pro keep grindan
it looks like shit and the UI is such a let down. It's clearly soulless compared to AoE2.
Not a bad game per se though.
What I hate the most about AoE 4 is the keybinds.
can you not just rebind them?
RTS is dead
it's a boomer genre that deserves to be buried but these Age of gays keep molesting it's corpse.
Just let it go man. It will never come back. There are far better genres now.
The female Japanese sound so cute
i last played aoe online
been more into company of heroes for my RTS fix these years
Give it to me straight
How much is AoE4 like Factorio?
I can only handle one type of autism.