yes, mammals are indeed shallow, possessing a lack of sentience, self awareness, and intelligence that allows one to challenge their nature for something more, it opens up the human capacity for more indepth long term experiences that aren't wholly self indulgent.
Nobody is saying sex is bad necessarily. Just people who obsess over it and pretend it's more than it is (or even that relevant, ever) are shallow. Simple. People will cry over this and cope with "b-but it's normal!" yeah and racism was normal, pretty sure there's a fallacy for this called...appeal to nature, and it's moronic.
Anyway I've made my point, and nobody will actually be able to challenge it, I'll either get adhoms, or just ignorance. Peace, this place isn't THAT worth conversation, if it's guaranteed to be shit.
Nothing about appealing to nature is a fallacy. You're an idiot. The manipulative homosexuals that control your mind just like to co-opt language morons like you think is authoritative. homosexuals are a perversion of premises rooted in nature that all organisms considered healthy agree on and base their cooperative enterprises on. You have no clue what a logical fallacy is and you'll work hard your entire life to avoid really learning anything about logic.
not sure if this guy even realizes that he hasn't actually made an argument against appeal to nature and is just whining about it...I didn't want to respond because it seemed pointless since if he's not making any argument and pretending like he's right in and of itself, then it's probably pointless but...I just had to point that out at the very least lol.
ironic that the people who tout having a "real" understanding of logic, really almost never employ it.
>You have no clue what a logical fallacy is and you'll work hard your entire life to avoid really learning anything about logic.
Like imagine thinking "You are wrong! Because you just are okay!?" in more words, is "logic".
And imagine appealing to "healthy organisms agreed upon" as "logic" when it's simultaneously begging the question and appealing to popularity...lol.
But never mind. If logic is just "what I think is right and agreed upon" then logic can be anything. kek
What would be the point of trying to explain anything? I gave you hints but like I predicted all you can do is work as hard as you can to avoid actually thinking for yourself because thinking would make you a heretic in the social circles you want to advance in. You don't think, you're not a real person, you're an animal so there's no explanation for anything you do except "appeals to nature". >And imagine appealing to
I can appeal to any fricking premise I want, that's how logic actually works, you give premises and work from them to explore their consequences. There's no magic "appeals" to certain premises that are more logical than others or less fallacious. You have no clue about anything, your mind is complete mush.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>What would be the point of trying to explain anything?
That's what an argument is.
>You don't think, you're not a real person, you're an animal so there's no explanation for anything you do except "appeals to nature".
Not an argument with any substantiation. Just an "opinion"
>I can appeal to any fricking premise I want, that's how logic actually works
No. That's how thought and "opinion" works. Just because you can appeal to something doesn't make it logically valid or relevant.
Logic isn't the same as thinking. You can think anything you want. Logic is concerned with truth (sound argument) or what can be true (in the case of validity).
>you give premises and work from them to explore their consequences.
This is a meaningless statement. Premises have to be proven for them to mean anything. Or else you could make up the a fantastical premise that has no relevance to reality:
P: A unicorn has a horn on its head
P: A horse can wear a plastic horn on its head.
C: Therefore Unicorns exist.
The premises presuppose to much and don't establish anything. What constitutes a horn or not. And most importantly, where a unicorn exists. It just takes advantage of language to create a madeuo category that has no basis in reality.
This is what premises allow. Made up categories and "realities" premises aren't inherently logic because they can either end up not leading to a conclusion, or having no reason to be considered true.
For another example:
P: When it rains the road is slippery
P: The road is slippery
C: Therefore it is raining.
This is a logical flaw, the premises dont necessarily follow the conclusion. The road can become slippery due to an oil spill or snow. But based on YOUR logic, you can just assert any premise and there's no such thing as logical flaw, error or fallacy because "premises is just how logic works!" No. You're moronic. If you premises aren't justified, there's no logic. And no meaning.
9 months ago
Anonymous
His opinions are right about you, you flaming firejuggling fricking homosexual.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Did you actually write this blog expecting anyone would read it? You have nothing to offer, you're mindless.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>Did you actually write this blog expecting anyone would read it? You have nothing to offer, you're mindless.
Lol. Good to know atleast that when somebody actually comes out with arguments and logic? You just reveal that your contentions were never honest in the first place or truly valuing of logic? and refer to adhoms.
For a moment? I was worried that I was stupid and didn't understand logic, but thankfully you guys are as stupid, predictable, and ignorant as I Initally thought. If my argument can't be challenged or debunked. Then there's no logical reason to think anything I'm saying is true. But I bet you'll somehow cook up an "opinion" that tells me I'm wrong (instead of actually showing it) and call it the "REAL" logic. kehehe, it's sad really, can't get a damn good conversation here no matter what...I almost had to think...
9 months ago
Anonymous
>for a moment I was worried I had to think for myself instead of getting aggressively defensive about my blatant moronation
I know, you're transparent and mindless. A completely predictable mass manufactured robot that repeats meme lines it doesn't understand. It's not just logic you don't understand, there is no thought process, you understand nothing.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>If my argument can't be challenged or debunked'
I just see you autisming hard about muh facts and logics DESTROYS FEMINIST like it's a 2015 youtube video spiel.
What is this sacred and unassailable argument that you think you have constructed when 90% of your text is below average rationalwiki moron shit?
9 months ago
Anonymous
>What is this sacred and unassailable argument that you think you have constructed when 90% of your text is below average rationalwiki moron shit?
How is this an argument? You're just characterizing what I said in the way you want. Whether you think it's below average rationalwiki shit doesn't change the point that it was a challenge to that anons abuse of "logic" and twisting it to his personal use. He implied "appeal to nature" and all logical fallacies somehow aren't actually "logical" and that I don't understand logic. I explained the basic tenets of logic therefore to him and gave examples of logical fallacies and explained why they were logically erroneous. It's that simple
If you can't engage with something honestly without having to mischaracterize it in your weird pet way of "it's JUST like this bad thing I don't respect so it's bad!" then just leave me be man. I'm just so tired of these retorts on this place it's all so meaningless and tiresome, why can't it actually just matter for something or someone to just be "right" for once, or even before that, to put effort into their post and show a willingness to respect and engage in discussion.
Whatever man. I'm tired.
9 months ago
Anonymous
You ignored what I said and tried to pretend reciting definitions means you understand something. You can't engage with anything because you have no mind, it's completely owned by demons.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>it's completely owned by demons.
lol, seriously can't tell if I'm being trolled by a schizophrenic lmao
if I am. Should I have known? Not that it can be helped. Being an honest interlocutor means being vulnerable and ppening yourself up to these kinda things *sigh*
9 months ago
Anonymous
>should I have known?
Yes part of why I called you out as the mindless cancer you are is is because you know nothing and have no interest in finding anything out.
You should be able to parse intention to some degree, attempt to relate to text you read and access subtext. Grasp what is tongue in cheek or referencing something you don't know about. How else would you operate at all within the limitations of this platform you chose to post on? Instead of trying to understand anything the method you've chosen to cope with the extremely poor decision of coming here is simply smugly dismissing anything that doesn't fit your conditioning.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>How is this an argument?
It wasn't, I was insulting you for being a dumb dumb because it's funny to me.
I also asked you for what your argument was. You still haven't told me. You've just given me an account of what you think transpired between the two of you.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>You've just given me an account of what you think transpired between the two of you.
You're so stupid it's unbelievable lmao. That IS an argument, if it's invalid it's your burden of proof to show that. If it's wrong it's your burden of proof to show that. Saying "I just don't agree with it so it isn't an argument" ...isn't an argument lmao. It's just an opinion with no substantiation, and therefore no falsifiability *sigh* it's worse when people don't have the humbleness or self awareness to realize how dumb they are...ugh, it's all so tiresome
9 months ago
Anonymous
this isn't a formal debate Black person and you're engaging in the very same behaviour that you criticize, making you a hypocrite. I hope you're under 21 because otherwise that would be very sad.
9 months ago
Anonymous
If you ask me why I want to live, the logical answer is based on my nature, as an organism I'm preconditioned with the want to live. I can't honestly justify my want based on any other premise, it's the logical cause in any decent model of my actions. This is an appeal to nature that's not fallacious.
If I say I should want to live because I'm an organism that wants to live that's circular and fallacious. I'm appealing to the premise to justify the premise.
But the premise is still a special case because it's shared by all living things and grounds all their actions. If I tell you I want to live a normal person doesn't reply to that with some reddit shit about how that's a fallacious le appeal to nature. It's a shared premise, a different thing from a fallacious appeal.
Now you made me type out a blog you won't understand a word of. Happy moron?
9 months ago
Anonymous
>This is an appeal to nature that's not fallacious.
No, it's pretty fallacious because, suicide exists. And even ignoring that. That's not the point. Saying "because nature preconditions me to live, then life is valuable" is appealing to nature and fallacious. Saying "I want to live because nature says I do" Is meaningless statement that communicates nothing.
Again. You don't understand logic. I also don't know why you keep appealing to "it's a shared premise" as if that means anything. That doesn't justify the premise. It's a meaningless statement. You're just begging the question. I don't care.
You're not intelligent enough for this conversation and it's irritating me. You don't realize that you haven't said or established anything this entire conversation other than effectively saying "Truth means Truth because it's True, and we recognize true things as true. It's a shared premise that Truth is true." kys, I'm angry, and tired of this whole engagement. It's unbelievably obnoxious having to baby you through basic shit while you're also being disingenuous and throwing adhoms at me
9 months ago
Anonymous
>No, it's pretty fallacious because, suicide exists.
You're demonstrating the point that you have no clue about anything related to logic yet smugly post about how other people are using logical fallacies, a term you heard somewhere but don't understand even a little bit.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>That doesn't justify the premise.
Nothing does, yet we both operate based on it. That's a shared premise. If I know you also want to live I can argue using appeals to that shared premise.
Exactly like I predicted it doesn't even occur to you to simply stop and think, you'll work endlessly to avoid it no matter what I say and then you act offended because I don't keep spoonfeeding some mindless parody of a human that doesn't want to learn the most basic shit imaginable.
9 months ago
Anonymous
funny. I get characterized as "avoiding what I say" when I proposed actual arguments that could be engaged with while you responded with meaningless truisms with no relevance since they don't challenge any of my arguments. just affirm your beliefs. You really don't even have the self awareness to realize this, so I'll accept your concession until you can come up with an argument.
Halflings females are the thickest. Biggest breasts and asses by far and their heads are at wiener height. I summoned Brynna the bard hireling to be my longstrider buff bawd after long rest, and she just chills at camp in a thong with the fire casting shadows all over her curves. I don't care if it's Whithers inside, I absolutely would.
What does Asterion's underwear look like on other characters? I killed him and you can't loot underwear for some reason so you lose out on the unique ones if an origin character dies.
>Minthara explicit almost to the point of gratuitousness (gnome gets a minute long blowjob while he puts his legs up over her shoulders) >everyone else fades to black
I am unironically in love with this fictional character. I wish I was joking. I'm literally depriving myself of a big chunk of this game's content because I can't bring myself to make any of the decisions that would upset Shadowheart or swap her out of my party.
>I can't bring myself to make any of the decisions that would upset Shadowheart
Don't be a simp you can be contrarian with her and she still can like you, best way to romance her is playing a Selunite
That didn't really happen, it's a fake video. Canonically she's a nun now and too pure for sex with anyone. The last time she had sex was with me as a mindflayer.
My long rest cutscenes were all fricked so it skipped her sex scene. I had sex with mizora instead but i still got my ending with Shadowheart, she forgave me so its cool
Totally random but relevant, Gale's underware suggests its enchanted. The description acts incredulous, but if you can afford to enchant your underwear why wouldn't you? Also, if you could, what kind of enchantments would you want on your under garments, in game or in real life?
Apparently you have to be considered in an "exclusive" relationship with her according to the flags in the files whatever that means.
The fact that almost nobody has gotten her to say that besides that screenshot and a webm it leads me to believe they did actually remove it.
I prefer Blonde white women
>mfw people render my wife in 1080p
she's my wife, sorry
she wants to be surrounded by dogs like the prostitute she is
That's a man with long hair
>forcing his troon fetish on biological women
Would you homosexual shills frick OFF
ask halsin. his claws are good for scrubbing
>White hair Shadowheart
Objective aesthetic downgrade. It just doesn't fit her like the black hair does.
Wrong
I'll scratch her bush if she'll scratch mine.
You can make her go blonde.
I prefer good video games.
TPBP
she likes bear meat
Talk to me
also let me lick those cute ears of yours Shadowheart
pussy!
I love my wife Shadowheart so much...
That's a man who wants to frick bears btw.
Also is friends with trannies.
Everyone had her. You married her.
so this is why bg3 is rated a 10 masterpiece by IGN and Stanfield just a 7 huh?
sex really appeals to shallow people
>sex really appeals to shallow people
Any game that lets me roleplay as a blonde white woman is a masterpiece to me
you don't even get a real sex scene with Shadowheart it just cuts to black so your argument holds no water as far as fans of Shadowheart go
and that's a bad thing!
I agree I'd kill for the most vanilla lovey dovey sex scene imaginable to be animated for her.
I dont remember that piece of dialogue.
Do you know where is it from?
it's when you give her a night orchid
Oh yeah true; she teases you that if you picked it by hand they are poisonous.
Ty anon
sex is more than LITERAL sex you know?
>everyone has a graphic sex scene but the white female
>Gale has three
You get a graphic sex scene with a squid too.
Sex appeals to functioning mammals
yes, mammals are indeed shallow, possessing a lack of sentience, self awareness, and intelligence that allows one to challenge their nature for something more, it opens up the human capacity for more indepth long term experiences that aren't wholly self indulgent.
Nobody is saying sex is bad necessarily. Just people who obsess over it and pretend it's more than it is (or even that relevant, ever) are shallow. Simple. People will cry over this and cope with "b-but it's normal!" yeah and racism was normal, pretty sure there's a fallacy for this called...appeal to nature, and it's moronic.
Anyway I've made my point, and nobody will actually be able to challenge it, I'll either get adhoms, or just ignorance. Peace, this place isn't THAT worth conversation, if it's guaranteed to be shit.
shadowheart isn't really coomer bait, she's sappy simp bait. fundamentally different. she appeals more to sentimentality
Bait being the keyword.
Normalize racism again.
Nothing about appealing to nature is a fallacy. You're an idiot. The manipulative homosexuals that control your mind just like to co-opt language morons like you think is authoritative. homosexuals are a perversion of premises rooted in nature that all organisms considered healthy agree on and base their cooperative enterprises on. You have no clue what a logical fallacy is and you'll work hard your entire life to avoid really learning anything about logic.
not sure if this guy even realizes that he hasn't actually made an argument against appeal to nature and is just whining about it...I didn't want to respond because it seemed pointless since if he's not making any argument and pretending like he's right in and of itself, then it's probably pointless but...I just had to point that out at the very least lol.
ironic that the people who tout having a "real" understanding of logic, really almost never employ it.
>You have no clue what a logical fallacy is and you'll work hard your entire life to avoid really learning anything about logic.
Like imagine thinking "You are wrong! Because you just are okay!?" in more words, is "logic".
And imagine appealing to "healthy organisms agreed upon" as "logic" when it's simultaneously begging the question and appealing to popularity...lol.
But never mind. If logic is just "what I think is right and agreed upon" then logic can be anything. kek
What would be the point of trying to explain anything? I gave you hints but like I predicted all you can do is work as hard as you can to avoid actually thinking for yourself because thinking would make you a heretic in the social circles you want to advance in. You don't think, you're not a real person, you're an animal so there's no explanation for anything you do except "appeals to nature".
>And imagine appealing to
I can appeal to any fricking premise I want, that's how logic actually works, you give premises and work from them to explore their consequences. There's no magic "appeals" to certain premises that are more logical than others or less fallacious. You have no clue about anything, your mind is complete mush.
>What would be the point of trying to explain anything?
That's what an argument is.
>You don't think, you're not a real person, you're an animal so there's no explanation for anything you do except "appeals to nature".
Not an argument with any substantiation. Just an "opinion"
>I can appeal to any fricking premise I want, that's how logic actually works
No. That's how thought and "opinion" works. Just because you can appeal to something doesn't make it logically valid or relevant.
Logic isn't the same as thinking. You can think anything you want. Logic is concerned with truth (sound argument) or what can be true (in the case of validity).
>you give premises and work from them to explore their consequences.
This is a meaningless statement. Premises have to be proven for them to mean anything. Or else you could make up the a fantastical premise that has no relevance to reality:
P: A unicorn has a horn on its head
P: A horse can wear a plastic horn on its head.
C: Therefore Unicorns exist.
The premises presuppose to much and don't establish anything. What constitutes a horn or not. And most importantly, where a unicorn exists. It just takes advantage of language to create a madeuo category that has no basis in reality.
This is what premises allow. Made up categories and "realities" premises aren't inherently logic because they can either end up not leading to a conclusion, or having no reason to be considered true.
For another example:
P: When it rains the road is slippery
P: The road is slippery
C: Therefore it is raining.
This is a logical flaw, the premises dont necessarily follow the conclusion. The road can become slippery due to an oil spill or snow. But based on YOUR logic, you can just assert any premise and there's no such thing as logical flaw, error or fallacy because "premises is just how logic works!" No. You're moronic. If you premises aren't justified, there's no logic. And no meaning.
His opinions are right about you, you flaming firejuggling fricking homosexual.
Did you actually write this blog expecting anyone would read it? You have nothing to offer, you're mindless.
>Did you actually write this blog expecting anyone would read it? You have nothing to offer, you're mindless.
Lol. Good to know atleast that when somebody actually comes out with arguments and logic? You just reveal that your contentions were never honest in the first place or truly valuing of logic? and refer to adhoms.
For a moment? I was worried that I was stupid and didn't understand logic, but thankfully you guys are as stupid, predictable, and ignorant as I Initally thought. If my argument can't be challenged or debunked. Then there's no logical reason to think anything I'm saying is true. But I bet you'll somehow cook up an "opinion" that tells me I'm wrong (instead of actually showing it) and call it the "REAL" logic. kehehe, it's sad really, can't get a damn good conversation here no matter what...I almost had to think...
>for a moment I was worried I had to think for myself instead of getting aggressively defensive about my blatant moronation
I know, you're transparent and mindless. A completely predictable mass manufactured robot that repeats meme lines it doesn't understand. It's not just logic you don't understand, there is no thought process, you understand nothing.
>If my argument can't be challenged or debunked'
I just see you autisming hard about muh facts and logics DESTROYS FEMINIST like it's a 2015 youtube video spiel.
What is this sacred and unassailable argument that you think you have constructed when 90% of your text is below average rationalwiki moron shit?
>What is this sacred and unassailable argument that you think you have constructed when 90% of your text is below average rationalwiki moron shit?
How is this an argument? You're just characterizing what I said in the way you want. Whether you think it's below average rationalwiki shit doesn't change the point that it was a challenge to that anons abuse of "logic" and twisting it to his personal use. He implied "appeal to nature" and all logical fallacies somehow aren't actually "logical" and that I don't understand logic. I explained the basic tenets of logic therefore to him and gave examples of logical fallacies and explained why they were logically erroneous. It's that simple
If you can't engage with something honestly without having to mischaracterize it in your weird pet way of "it's JUST like this bad thing I don't respect so it's bad!" then just leave me be man. I'm just so tired of these retorts on this place it's all so meaningless and tiresome, why can't it actually just matter for something or someone to just be "right" for once, or even before that, to put effort into their post and show a willingness to respect and engage in discussion.
Whatever man. I'm tired.
You ignored what I said and tried to pretend reciting definitions means you understand something. You can't engage with anything because you have no mind, it's completely owned by demons.
>it's completely owned by demons.
lol, seriously can't tell if I'm being trolled by a schizophrenic lmao
if I am. Should I have known? Not that it can be helped. Being an honest interlocutor means being vulnerable and ppening yourself up to these kinda things *sigh*
>should I have known?
Yes part of why I called you out as the mindless cancer you are is is because you know nothing and have no interest in finding anything out.
You should be able to parse intention to some degree, attempt to relate to text you read and access subtext. Grasp what is tongue in cheek or referencing something you don't know about. How else would you operate at all within the limitations of this platform you chose to post on? Instead of trying to understand anything the method you've chosen to cope with the extremely poor decision of coming here is simply smugly dismissing anything that doesn't fit your conditioning.
>How is this an argument?
It wasn't, I was insulting you for being a dumb dumb because it's funny to me.
I also asked you for what your argument was. You still haven't told me. You've just given me an account of what you think transpired between the two of you.
>You've just given me an account of what you think transpired between the two of you.
You're so stupid it's unbelievable lmao. That IS an argument, if it's invalid it's your burden of proof to show that. If it's wrong it's your burden of proof to show that. Saying "I just don't agree with it so it isn't an argument" ...isn't an argument lmao. It's just an opinion with no substantiation, and therefore no falsifiability *sigh* it's worse when people don't have the humbleness or self awareness to realize how dumb they are...ugh, it's all so tiresome
this isn't a formal debate Black person and you're engaging in the very same behaviour that you criticize, making you a hypocrite. I hope you're under 21 because otherwise that would be very sad.
If you ask me why I want to live, the logical answer is based on my nature, as an organism I'm preconditioned with the want to live. I can't honestly justify my want based on any other premise, it's the logical cause in any decent model of my actions. This is an appeal to nature that's not fallacious.
If I say I should want to live because I'm an organism that wants to live that's circular and fallacious. I'm appealing to the premise to justify the premise.
But the premise is still a special case because it's shared by all living things and grounds all their actions. If I tell you I want to live a normal person doesn't reply to that with some reddit shit about how that's a fallacious le appeal to nature. It's a shared premise, a different thing from a fallacious appeal.
Now you made me type out a blog you won't understand a word of. Happy moron?
>This is an appeal to nature that's not fallacious.
No, it's pretty fallacious because, suicide exists. And even ignoring that. That's not the point. Saying "because nature preconditions me to live, then life is valuable" is appealing to nature and fallacious. Saying "I want to live because nature says I do" Is meaningless statement that communicates nothing.
Again. You don't understand logic. I also don't know why you keep appealing to "it's a shared premise" as if that means anything. That doesn't justify the premise. It's a meaningless statement. You're just begging the question. I don't care.
You're not intelligent enough for this conversation and it's irritating me. You don't realize that you haven't said or established anything this entire conversation other than effectively saying "Truth means Truth because it's True, and we recognize true things as true. It's a shared premise that Truth is true." kys, I'm angry, and tired of this whole engagement. It's unbelievably obnoxious having to baby you through basic shit while you're also being disingenuous and throwing adhoms at me
>No, it's pretty fallacious because, suicide exists.
You're demonstrating the point that you have no clue about anything related to logic yet smugly post about how other people are using logical fallacies, a term you heard somewhere but don't understand even a little bit.
>That doesn't justify the premise.
Nothing does, yet we both operate based on it. That's a shared premise. If I know you also want to live I can argue using appeals to that shared premise.
Exactly like I predicted it doesn't even occur to you to simply stop and think, you'll work endlessly to avoid it no matter what I say and then you act offended because I don't keep spoonfeeding some mindless parody of a human that doesn't want to learn the most basic shit imaginable.
funny. I get characterized as "avoiding what I say" when I proposed actual arguments that could be engaged with while you responded with meaningless truisms with no relevance since they don't challenge any of my arguments. just affirm your beliefs. You really don't even have the self awareness to realize this, so I'll accept your concession until you can come up with an argument.
>Peace, this place isn't THAT worth conversation
Don't come back.
So does rape and murder and stealing
Which are all just means of getting SEXO.
what do
walk over and take off her clothes instead
unzip dick
UHMMM HECKIN TERMINATOR REFERENCE AMIRITE GAMERS?
why are her eyebrows still black
looks stupid
White hair + black eyebrows + black pubes is a top tier combo
You wouldn’t get it
there should be a buttplug slot
thank you
now the peeking pit hair
My man, nice!
Can't you have made it a sharrite or selunite tattoo instead of your cuckshit
>Cuckshit
Anon please, clear your head a little. It's just a generic womb tattoo.
>literally the queen of spades
>"yeah bro it's just a generic one trust me"
What? There's no spade visible. The only symbol is the womb shape and a little heart.
Ach quatsch. You can still see the point of the spade poking out
I keep being surprised people don't put her in asterian underwear which looks even better on her.
i gave my femdwarf pc astarion's underwear
>that subtle tummy shadow with it
muh
Bro why are the dwarven women in BG3 such HONIES? They're cuter than the elves.
Halflings females are the thickest. Biggest breasts and asses by far and their heads are at wiener height. I summoned Brynna the bard hireling to be my longstrider buff bawd after long rest, and she just chills at camp in a thong with the fire casting shadows all over her curves. I don't care if it's Whithers inside, I absolutely would.
What does Asterion's underwear look like on other characters? I killed him and you can't loot underwear for some reason so you lose out on the unique ones if an origin character dies.
its the generic elf underwear. halsin also has it in another color.
On girls it gives panties that are almost like a thong.
pic related
that's more like it
perfection
attention prostitute who does not work out
PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP
Where is the bush you homosexual
She doesn't look anywhere near that good
Shadowheart only takes evards black tentacles anyways
>Minthara explicit almost to the point of gratuitousness (gnome gets a minute long blowjob while he puts his legs up over her shoulders)
>everyone else fades to black
lmao why
to sell you the sex scenes in the definitive edition for consoles
That scene was in EA/Act 1, aka the only part where effort was put in.
And here I tought the game was going to keep thinking I had killed Alfira forever
>Goldthroat
h-hot...
Why would you kill him over a lesbian? Are you moronic?
>him
Also Alfira is cute
She is also a lesbian. I don't make the rules - I only enforce them.
Shadowheart is my waifu
I've never even played BG3
does the characters have any reaction if you make them go fully naked in public?
I am unironically in love with this fictional character. I wish I was joking. I'm literally depriving myself of a big chunk of this game's content because I can't bring myself to make any of the decisions that would upset Shadowheart or swap her out of my party.
Welcome to the club.
Like she's literally the only thing I've thought about for the last month.
You can save her 100% if you play correctly. Just want you to know that.
>I can't bring myself to make any of the decisions that would upset Shadowheart
Don't be a simp you can be contrarian with her and she still can like you, best way to romance her is playing a Selunite
I'm going to do a Selunite playthrough next. I want to argue about her dumb religion the entire game and ultimately love Jihad her into the light.
>right tit is sagging/resting
>left tit is round
another shitty artist shilling thread i see
That's kinda hot
you really can pay her voice actress to pretend to be Shadowheart for you
I considered it but I don't know what I would want her to say
>not paying for some horny talk as she jerks you off
I mean she can still decline it and I doubt she'd do something sexually explicit like that. Not that that is what I would want anyway.
She probably withholds the right to not say embarassing or uncomfortable things. Or things for the coomers, that's my guess.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/1060
install this
>
Adult content
This mod contains adult content. You can turn adult content on in your preference, if you wish
Is there a mod that does the opposite of this? Asking for a friend
No, install this instead.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/833
low test
Canonically she broke up with me because I became a mindflayer. She's now a nun and none of you can have her.
>Canonically she broke up with me because I became a mindflayer.
skill issue?
Skill issue
That didn't really happen, it's a fake video. Canonically she's a nun now and too pure for sex with anyone. The last time she had sex was with me as a mindflayer.
in my playthrough we had lots of sex and kisses until the end. karlach became the mindflayer.
>not raping her while she's a nun
Are you even trying to be a mindflayer you homosexual
My long rest cutscenes were all fricked so it skipped her sex scene. I had sex with mizora instead but i still got my ending with Shadowheart, she forgave me so its cool
There's like 8 skeletons fricking my wife rn.
you can't have sex with skeletons
Hey that's true!
This but wolves, that's how she gets over her fear of them
she's getting boned!
if her face wasn't so long I would get the appeal
every western game has this issue for some reason
Totally random but relevant, Gale's underware suggests its enchanted. The description acts incredulous, but if you can afford to enchant your underwear why wouldn't you? Also, if you could, what kind of enchantments would you want on your under garments, in game or in real life?
Pubes where
>a number of shadowheart porn are just AIslop
It's fricking over
thats how its been for all characters for well over a year now, you need to filter it out during all searches
he cute
nghhh
Who is she?
Shadowheart
why is all fanart of Shadowheart vastly better than her dumpy character model lmao?
It isn't? I much prefer in game shots of her to fanart.
play the game
Where the FRICK do I get that white robe/dress thing she wears in screenshots
In the dress shop in baldur's gate
Fricking ty anons. Time to goon
I found one in Cazador's palace in Act 3
dress shop near Baldur's Gate sigil or Cazador's house (manor level, on the sofa).
As someone with a meditation fetish i appreciate the devs
>meditation fetish
Huhh?
Cute/hot girl meditating is simply what gives me boners anon
I'm very much considering paying her voice actress to enact pregnancy farm ending. It just feels awkward because her voice actress is a lesbian.
Just use ai moron
we already went over this AI sucks ass it won't sound right and you have to make a script
When does this line play?
ending scene if you aren't a mind flayer and don't romance others
Apparently you have to be considered in an "exclusive" relationship with her according to the flags in the files whatever that means.
The fact that almost nobody has gotten her to say that besides that screenshot and a webm it leads me to believe they did actually remove it.
Women are only rebelliously lesbian, real lesbians do not exist. You can pregnancy farm any of them with enough patience (but why would you want to).
Now make it a paw print.
It needs to be bigger.
so kissable
>Mutt
Ugh.
bears always sex
and that's all this "game" is
but she's so boring.................... dull....... and mid.
WHY KS HER HAIR WHITE
Because of spoilers.
>tfw killed shadow heart on nautilus and took her camp clothes, forgot that I put it on wyll. Now wyll wears it proudly in my playthrough
Wheres her pubes?
She looks like she fricks druid men exclusively.